Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation Research Articles

Peripheral neuropathy prevalence and effect on mobility 12 months after prosthesis prescription among individuals with dysvascular lower extremity amputation.

To determine the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy (PN) and its effect on mobility in patients who were prescribed a lower limb prosthesis (LLP) after an incident dysvascular transtibial (TT) or transfemoral (TF) lower extremity amputation (LEA). We also sought to determine if the effect of PN on mobility was modified by amputation level or depression. Participants were identified retrospectively through the Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) from March 1, 2018, to November 30, 2020, then were contacted prospectively to obtain their self-reported mobility. Multiple logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders and identify potential effect modifiers. The VA CDW, the National Prosthetics Patient Database, participant mailings and phone calls. Three hundred fifty-seven individuals who underwent a TT or TF amputation due to diabetes and/or peripheral arterial disease and were fitted with a qualifying LLP. Not applicable. The Locomotor Capabilities Index basic and advanced mobility subscale scores. Two-hundred thirty seven participants (66%) had a diagnosis of PN prior to prosthesis prescription. The detrimental effect of PN on achieving basic and advanced mobility was significant after adjusting for potential confounding factors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.94; p = .03 and aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77; p = .005, respectively). The detrimental effect of PN was more pronounced in patients with depression, especially for advanced mobility (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.95; p = .04) versus no depression (aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27-1.0; p = .07). PN is common in patients who have undergone an LEA due to diabetes and/or vascular disease and patients with this diagnosis should be carefully evaluated. Targeted rehabilitation programs to mitigate its potential detrimental effects on mobility are important and should specifically include mental health assessment and treatment.

Racial disparities in prosthesis abandonment and mobility outcomes after lower limb amputation from a dysvascular etiology in a veteran population.

Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) individuals have higher rates of amputation and increased risk of a transfemoral amputation due to dysvascular disease than non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. However, it is unclear if NHB individuals have differences in prosthesis use or functional outcomes following an amputation. To determine if there are racial disparities in prosthesis abandonment and mobility outcomes in veterans who have undergone their first major unilateral lower extremity amputation (LEA) due to diabetes and/or peripheral artery disease. National cohort study that identified individuals retrospectively through the Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) from March 1, 2018, to November 30, 2020, then prospectively collected their self-reported prosthesis abandonment and mobility. Multiple logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders and identify potential effect modifiers. The VA CDW, participant mailings and phone calls. Three hundred fifty-seven individuals who underwent an incident transtibial or transfemoral amputation due to diabetes and/or peripheral arterial disease. Not applicable. (1) Self-reported prosthesis abandonment. (2) Level of mobility assessed using the Locomotor Capabilities Index. Rurally located NHB individuals without a major depressive disorder (MDD) had increased odds of abandoning their prosthesis (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.3-21.1]). This disparity was nearly three times as large for rurally located NHB individuals with MDD diagnosis, compared with other races from rural areas and with MDD (aOR = 15.8; 95% CI, 2.5-97.6). NHB individuals living in an urban area were significantly less likely to achieve advanced mobility, both with MDD (aOR=0.16; 95% CI: [0.04-7.0]) and without MDD (aOR = 0.26; 95% CI: [0.09-0.73]). This study demonstrated that health care disparities persist for NHB veterans following a dysvascular LEA, with increased prosthesis abandonment and worse mobility outcomes.

An Examination of Health-Utilities in People with Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation

An Examination of Health-Utilities in People with Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation

Health utility in community-dwelling adults with dysvascular lower limb loss.

Adults with dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA) experience a large number of secondary health conditions yet there is a gap in the literature on health utility scores for this population. A health utility score relates to a person's state of well-being, and is a single metric anchored at 0 (death) and 1 (perfect health).This study aimed to provide a descriptive account of health utility scores in community-dwelling adults with dysvascular LEA. Participants were adults with dysvascular LEA who were 3months post-amputation. Data collected included socio-demographic characteristics, the Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine (SIGAM)grades, the dysvascular conditions scale (DCS), which is a scale developed for this study, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). SF-6D health utility scores were derived from the SF-36 using a software algorithm. Participants were grouped into low-impact and high-impact groups based on self-reported severity of symptoms using the DCS. Health utility scores were compared between the low-impact and high-impact groups using independent t-tests. A total of 231 participants were enrolled in the study. The mean SF-6D health utility score was 0.689 (0.127). A significant association was found between health utility score and SIGAM grade (p < 0.001, η2 = .09). Health utility was positively associated with age (r = 0.137, p = 0.037) and months post-amputation (r = 0.141, p = 0.032), and negatively associated with DCS severity (r = -0.526, p < 0.001). Health utility scores were lower for participants in the DCS high-impact groups for conditions such as diabetes mellitus, phantom limb pain, musculoskeletal pain, back pain, psychological distress, depression, vision problems, and other pain. Cost-utility analyses rely on health utility estimates and our findings provide data for future economic evaluations that may assist policy makers in evidence informed allocation of healthcare resources for this population.

Examination of social disconnectedness and perceived social isolation on health and life satisfaction in community-dwelling adults with dysvascular lower limb loss.

People with physical disabilities are at risk for social isolation, which has been shown to negatively influence health and well-being. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of social disconnectedness and perceived social isolation (PSI) on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and life satisfaction in adults with dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA). Cross-sectional survey. Data were collected from community-dwelling adults with dysvascular major LEA (N = 231). The main outcome measures were the Short-Form 36 and the Life Satisfaction-11. Other measures were used to quantify comorbidities/secondary health conditions, PSI, social disconnectedness, self-efficacy, social support, and social engagement. Three hierarchical regression models were conducted to predict (1) physical HrQoL, (2) mental HrQoL, and (3) life satisfaction. Approximately one-third of the sample had high levels of social disconnectedness and PSI. The regression model predicting physical HrQoL accounted for 47% of the variance and only found that higher levels of mobility, lower perceived impact of comorbidities/conditions, and higher levels of social engagement and self-efficacy were associated with better physical HrQoL. A model predicting mental HrQoL accounted for 36% of the variance, with older age, lower PSI, and higher levels of self-efficacy being significant predictors. Finally, the model predicting life satisfaction accounted for 56% of the variance, with older age, lower perceived impact of comorbidities/conditions, and higher self-efficacy remaining as significant predictors. These findings highlight that one-third of our sample were at risk for being socially isolated and that PSI was influential on mental HrQoL and life satisfaction. There is a need for approaches to address social isolation for people with dysvascular LEA living in the community to optimize their long-term health and well-being.

Hemodialysis is Not Associated With Pre-prosthetic Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes After Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lower extremity amputation due to complications from peripheral vascular disease and/or diabetes are common and these patients often have multiple comorbidities. Patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis (ESRD/HD) are a particularly vulnerable group at risk for amputation. After lower extremity amputation (LEA) surgery, many patients undergo post-operative inpatient rehabilitation to improve their pre-prosthetic functional independence. Given the increased complexity of dysvascular patients living with ESRD/HD compared to those without ESRD/HD, the association of HD with pre-prosthetic inpatient functional outcomes warrants further study. The objective of this study was to compare the pre-prosthetic functional outcomes and Length of Stay (LOS) among patients with recent dysvascular LEA with and without ESRD/HD. A retrospective cohort design was used to analyze a group of 167 patients with unilateral, dysvascular limb loss who were admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 24 of these patients in the ESRD/HD group. Age, gender, amputation level, amputation side, length of stay (LOS), time since surgery, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores (admission and discharge), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were collected. There was no difference between patients with dysvascular amputation with and without ESRD/HD in the association of functional outcomes or LOS in this cohort and rehabilitation model. The CCI score was higher in the ESRD/HD group. Multivariate analysis indicated an inverse relationship with age and FIM scores, where increased age was associated with lower Total and Motor FIM at admission and discharge. There were no associations with FIM change. Age was positively associated with LOS. Being female was inversely associated to motor FIM scores at admission and discharge. Among patients with recent dysvascular LEA, ESRD/HD is not associated with different functional outcomes or LOS in the pre-prosthetic inpatient rehabilitation setting. This suggests that despite added comorbidity that patients with ESRD/HD may still benefit from inpatient rehabilitation to optimize pre-prosthetic function.

Healthcare Disparities in Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputations

Our goal is to provide a current review of health disparities in patients with dysvascular lower extremity amputation, so that we can better identify how disparities persist after an amputation and how to reduce these disparities. Health disparities in amputation risk, level, and outcomes exist in the USA based on race/ethnicity, gender, income, insurance, care provider, hospital, neighborhood, and US region. While health disparities exist for patients with dysvascular lower extremity amputation, little is known about differences in function, rehabilitation, and prosthesis prescriptions. Future research in this area is important, so that we can better identify how disparities persist after an amputation.

Comorbidity and Non-prosthetic Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes After Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation.

Dysvascular amputations arising from peripheral vascular disease and/or diabetes are common. Patients who undergo amputation often have additional comorbidities that may impact their recovery after surgery. Many individuals undergo post-operative inpatient rehabilitation to improve their non-prosthetic functional independence. Thus far, our characterization of comorbidity in this population and how it is associated with non-prosthetic inpatient functional recovery remains relatively unexplored. The objective of this study was to describe comorbidities, using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and to examine associations between comorbidity and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with dysvascular limb loss undergoing non-prosthetic inpatient rehabilitation. A retrospective cohort design was used to analyze a group of 143 patients with unilateral, dysvascular limb loss who were admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. Age, sex, amputation level, amputation side, length of stay (LOS), time since surgery, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores (Total and Motor at admission and discharge), and CCI scores were collected. The data showed that neither total or specific comorbidities were associated with functional outcomes or LOS in this cohort and rehabilitation model. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an inverse relationship with age and FIM scores, where increased age was associated with lower Total and Motor FIM at admission and discharge. Comorbidities were not associated with functional outcomes. Dementia was negatively associated with FIM scores, however this requires more study given the low number of patients with dementia in this cohort. These data suggest that regardless of burden of comorbidity or specific comorbidities that patients with dysvascular limb loss may derive similar functional benefit from post-operative non-prosthetic inpatient rehabilitation.

Falls After Dysvascular Transtibial Amputation: A Secondary Analysis of Falling Characteristics and Reduced Physical Performance.

Over half of all people with lower limb amputation (LLA) experience at least one fall annually. Furthermore, the majority of LLAs result from dysvascular health complications, contributing to balance deficits. However, fall-related research specific to dysvascular LLA remains limited. To characterize falls among adults with dysvascular LLA, using an existing Fall-Type Classification Framework and to describe the functional characteristics of participants across the framework categories. Secondary data analysis from two randomized controlled trials. Outpatient setting. People (n = 69) 6 months to 5 years from dysvascular lower extremity amputation, who were ≥50 years of age and independently ambulatory using a prosthesis. None. Descriptions of self-reported falls were collected on a weekly basis for 12 weeks, and analyzed using an existing Fall-Type Classification Framework. Fall frequencies, estimated count, and estimated proportions were compared across all framework categories, with 95% confidence intervals. Functional measures (Timed Up and Go, Two Minute Walk, Five Meter Walk, and average step count) were collected, and averages for each participant who experienced a fall were calculated. Thirty participants (43.5%) reported 42 falls within 12 weeks. A variety of fall types were described. Incidence of falls was highest for intrinsic destabilization sources, from incorrect weight shift patterns during transfer activities. Patients with dysvascular LLAs experience a variety of fall types. The high frequency of intrinsically sourced, incorrect weight-shift falls during transfer activities emphasizes the need to focus rehabilitation efforts on improving postural control in patients with dysvascular LLAs during activities such as reaching, turning, and transferring.

A Depiction of Rehabilitation Patients 65 Years and Younger With Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation.

The majority of lower limb amputations (LLA) in Canada are dysvascular due to complications of diabetes and/or vascular disease. Traditionally dysvascular amputations have occurred in the elderly. With younger onset of adult diabetes, amputations are now occurring in non-geriatric populations. An understanding of younger patients with dysvascular LLA is needed to determine their risk factors, and unique health and psychosocial challenges. To obtain a depiction of the key demographic and impairment characteristics of adults 65 years and younger with dysvascular LLA undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. A retrospective chart review was completed on inpatient adult amputation rehabilitation patients over a five year period. Data extracted included socio-demographics, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, comorbidities, and discharge outcomes. One hundred and forty-three patients who were 65 years and younger were included, which represented almost a quarter of all admissions. Most patients were male (79%) with an average age of 55 years old (SD=8). The majority (72%) were unemployed. The mean number of co-morbidities was 5.2 (SD=8.2). Individuals discharged home (n=122) had higher (p<0.05) FIM scores than those readmitted to acute care or discharged to long-term care (n=20). Similar to the literature on older dysvascular LLA patients, our study found high rates of disability and co-morbidities in younger patients with dysvascular LLA, which might impact their ability to work. Given these challenges, better amputation prevention strategies and targeted rehabilitation programming for this population are needed.

Quality of Relationships With Caregivers, Depression, and Life Satisfaction After Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation

ObjectiveTo describe the relationship between caregiver-specific support and conflict, and psychosocial outcomes among individuals experiencing their first dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA). DesignCross-sectional cohort study using self-report surveys. SettingDepartment of Veterans Affairs, academic medical center, and level I trauma center. ParticipantsIndividuals undergoing their first major LEA because of complications of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or diabetes who have a caregiver and completed measures of caregiver support and conflict (N=137; 94.9% men). InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to assess depression and the Satisfaction With Life Scale to assess life satisfaction. ResultsIn multiple regression analyses, controlling for global levels of perceived support, self-rated health, age, and mobility, caregiver-specific support was found to be associated with higher levels of life satisfaction and caregiver-specific conflict was found to be associated with lower levels of life satisfaction and higher levels of depressive symptoms. ConclusionsThe specific relationship between individuals with limb loss and their caregivers may be an important determinant of well-being. Conflict with caregivers, which has received little attention thus far in the limb loss literature, appears to play a particularly important role. Individuals with limb loss may benefit from interventions with their caregivers that both enhance support and reduce conflict.

A Longitudinal Study of Social Participation After Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation.

This study examined patterns of social participation among individuals experiencing their first dysvascular lower extremity amputation. We identified the types of social participation valued by this population and explored factors that were associated with individuals' levels of participation and their subjective satisfaction with participation. A prospective cohort was recruited from four Veterans Administration Medical Centers and followed for 1 yr after amputation. Social participation was measured with a modified version of the Community Integration Questionnaire. Potential correlates included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Modified Social Support Survey, Locomotor Capability Index 5, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, and self-rated health. At 1-yr postamputation, participants indicated that the most valued aspects of social participation were maintaining close friendships, visiting loved ones, and managing finances. Levels of social participation and satisfaction with participation were modest at 1-yr postamputation. Higher levels of social participation at 1 yr were related to better baseline mental status, better premorbid mobility, and lower amputation level. Higher satisfaction with participation was related to greater baseline social support. Individuals' social participation may be influenced by physical and cognitive factors, whereas their satisfaction with participation may be influenced by psychosocial factors. Rehabilitation specialists are encouraged to address both aspects of social participation when formulating and pursuing rehabilitation goals.

The development and validation of the AMPREDICT model for predicting mobility outcome after dysvascular lower extremity amputation

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was the development of AMPREDICT-Mobility, a tool to predict the probability of independence in either basic or advanced (iBASIC or iADVANCED) mobility 1 year after dysvascular major lower extremity amputation. MethodsTwo prospective cohort studies during consecutive 4-year periods (2005-2009 and 2010-2014) were conducted at seven medical centers. Multiple demographic and biopsychosocial predictors were collected in the periamputation period among individuals undergoing their first major amputation because of complications of peripheral arterial disease or diabetes. The primary outcomes were iBASIC and iADVANCED mobility, as measured by the Locomotor Capabilities Index. Combined data from both studies were used for model development and internal validation. Backwards stepwise logistic regression was used to develop the final prediction models. The discrimination and calibration of each model were assessed. Internal validity of each model was assessed with bootstrap sampling. ResultsTwelve-month follow-up was reached by 157 of 200 (79%) participants. Among these, 54 (34%) did not achieve iBASIC mobility, 103 (66%) achieved at least iBASIC mobility, and 51 (32%) also achieved iADVANCED mobility. Predictive factors associated with reduced odds of achieving iBASIC mobility were increasing age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dialysis, diabetes, prior history of treatment for depression or anxiety, and very poor to fair self-rated health. Those who were white, were married, and had at least a high-school degree had a higher probability of achieving iBASIC mobility. The odds of achieving iBASIC mobility increased with increasing body mass index up to 30 kg/m2 and decreased with increasing body mass index thereafter. The prediction model of iADVANCED mobility included the same predictors with the exception of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and education level. Both models showed strong discrimination with C statistics of 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. The mean difference in predicted probabilities for those who did and did not achieve iBASIC and iADVANCED mobility was 33% and 29%, respectively. Tests for calibration and observed vs predicted plots suggested good fit for both models; however, the precision of the estimates of the predicted probabilities was modest. Internal validation through bootstrapping demonstrated some overoptimism of the original model development, with the optimism-adjusted C statistic for iBASIC and iADVANCED mobility being 0.74 and 0.71, respectively, and the discrimination slope 19% and 16%, respectively. ConclusionsAMPREDICT-Mobility is a user-friendly prediction tool that can inform the patient undergoing a dysvascular amputation and the patient's provider about the probability of independence in either basic or advanced mobility at each major lower extremity amputation level.

Functional Outcomes After the Prosthetic Training Phase of Rehabilitation After Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation

ObjectiveTo describe physical function outcomes and modes of physical therapy intervention for a cohort of patients with dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA) during the prosthetic training phase of rehabilitation. DesignA retrospective cohort study. SettingPhysical rehabilitation clinics at a Veterans Affairs medical center and a university hospital. PatientsForty-two patients (38 men, 4 women, age 60.2 ± 8.4 years) who completed outpatient physical therapy rehabilitation with prosthetic training after dysvascular LEA. MethodsAll patients underwent a prosthetic training phase of rehabilitation, with standardized outcome measures performed at initiation and discharge. Main Outcome MeasuresPerformance-based physical function measures included Two-Minute Walk (2MW), Timed-Up and Go (TUG), and 5-meter gait speed. Self-report physical function measures included the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire–Mobility Section (PEQ-MS) and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale. Rehabilitation dose was tracked as total number of clinic visits, rehabilitation duration, and specific intervention modes. ResultsThere were significant improvements between initial and discharge values (mean ± SD) for the Two-Minute Walk (67.5 ± 29.9 m and 103.3 ± 45.8 m, respectively, P < .001), gait speed (0.58 ± 0.27 m/s and 0.88 ± 0.39 m/s, respectively, P < .001), TUG (34.8 ± 21.3 seconds and 18.6 ± 13.9 seconds, respectively, P < .001), PEQ-MS (2.2 ± 0.9 and 2.8 ± 0.8, respectively, P < .001), and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (3.2 ± 2.0 and 5.9 ± 2.3, respectively, P < .001). Performance-based (TUG) and self-report (PEQ-MS) changes in functional mobility from initial exam to discharge had low or no correlations with rehabilitation dose measures. The number of clinic visits was 12.7 ± 13.1 and rehabilitation duration was 13.7 ± 16.8 weeks. ConclusionsSignificant improvements in performance-based and self-report measures of physical function occurred during the prosthetic training phase of physical rehabilitation after dysvascular major LEA. Despite improvements in function, gait speed, and TUG outcomes remained below clinically important thresholds, indicating patients were limited in community ambulation and at risk for falls. Lack of moderate or greater correlation between rehabilitation dose and outcome measures may indicate the need for more specific rehabilitation dose measures.

The role of expectations in pain after dysvascular lower extremity amputation.

The objective was to determine the relationship between pain expectations assessed prior to surgery and satisfaction with pain 4 and 12 months after major dysvascular lower extremity amputation. The study included a prospective cohort of male (n = 19) veterans experiencing their first lower extremity amputation due to complications of diabetes mellitus or peripheral arterial disease. Measures included presurgical expectations of pain at 4 and 12 months postamputation, actual average pain and satisfaction with pain at 4 and 12 months postamputation, and agreement between expected and actual pain. Sixty-eight percent of participants expected to experience no or minimal pain at 4 months; 95% expected to experience no or minimal pain at 12 months. Thirty-two percent and 58% of participants had more pain than they expected at 4 and 12 months, respectively. Participants whose pain expectations were met reported higher satisfaction with their actual level of pain at 12 months postamputation, even after adjusting for current pain levels. The results underscore the potential value of fostering realistic expectations about the degree to which amputation may impact average pain.

The Effect of Rehabilitation in a Comprehensive Inpatient Rehabilitation Unit on Mobility Outcome After Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation

Czerniecki JM, Turner AP, Williams RM, Hakimi KN, Norvell DC. The effect of rehabilitation in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation unit on mobility outcome after dysvascular lower extremity amputation. ObjectivesTo (1) compare the total volume of rehabilitation therapy for patients ever attending a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation unit (CIRU) versus never during the 12 months after amputation; (2) determine whether rehabilitation in a CIRU at any time in the first year after amputation results in greater mobility success compared with other types of rehabilitation environments of care; and (3) determine for those patients treated in a CIRU, which specific patient characteristics were associated with improved mobility outcome. DesignProspective cohort study. SettingTwo Veterans Affairs medical centers. ParticipantsPatients (N=199) with peripheral vascular disease or diabetes undergoing a first unilateral major amputation were screened for participation between September 2005 and December 2008. Among these, 113 (57%) met study criteria; of these, 72 (64%) participated. InterventionEver attending a CIRU versus never attending a CIRU in first 12 months after amputation. Main Outcome MeasuresNumber of rehabilitation therapy visits, Locomotor Capability Index scores, and mobility success. ResultsThe mean number of all therapy visits for patients ever attending a CIRU was significantly greater than that for those never attending over a 12-month period (48.6 vs 22.6; P=.001). Mean total time per any rehabilitation visit was .83±.27 hours for those ever attending and .60±.20 hours for those never attending (P<.001). Patients who ever were treated in a CIRU were 17% more likely to achieve mobility success than those who were not, controlling for amputation level, major depressive episode, alcohol use, social support, total number of rehabilitation visits, and hospital site (risk difference=.17; 95% confidence interval, .09–.25; P<.001). ConclusionsRehabilitation in a CIRU resulted in improved mobility success for veterans undergoing major lower extremity amputation secondary to peripheral vascular disease or diabetes. Among those admitted to a CIRU, younger patients with greater social support, healthy weight, and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had the greatest probability of mobility success.