Assessment Of Dysphagia Research Articles

Intensive care unit-acquired dysphagia – change in feeding route after a standardized dysphagia assessment in neurocritical care patients

Background: Dysphagia is a frequent finding on intensive care units (ICUs) and is associated with increased reintubation rates, pneumonia, and prolonged ICU-stay. Only a limited numbers of ICUs have access to a Speech and Language Pathologist (SLP). Hence, it falls upon the critical care team to estimate dysphagia risk and define the safest feeding route. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate if the feeding route established by the ICU-team is changed after a standardized dysphagia assessment (DA) by an SLP. Furthermore, we tried to identify predictors for the need of a SLP assessment looking at the change in feeding route (CIFR) after DA. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients consecutively admitted for at least 48 h in 2018, to the ICU of the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery. Following variables were assessed: Referral to an SLP, feeding route before and after DA by an SLP, main diagnosis, and ventilation parameters. Results: From 497 included patients (65 years, IQR 51–77), 148 received a DA, confirming dysphagia in 125 subjects. DA by the SLP resulted in a significant CIFR, with 32 (21.6%) subjects receiving stricter diets, and in 29 (19.6%) cases a reduction of dietary recommendations. 50 patients lacked readiness for oral intake due to severely affected oral phase or reduced consciousness. Conclusion: Dysphagia is a frequent finding in the Neuro-ICU. Assessment of dysphagia-risk and safest feeding route differ significantly between the SLP and the critical care team. Besides implementation of standardized operating procedures for DA, the presence of ICU-specific trained SLP should be mandatory.

Autoimmune dysphagia.

Dysphagia is a complication of several autoimmune rheumatic diseases and otorhinolaryngologists are likely to be involved in the assessment and management of patients with such conditions. This review provides an update on rheumatic diseases that may cause swallowing impairment, with particular focus on the epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of dysphagia in these conditions. Dysphagia is a common complication of the following rheumatic diseases: idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, systemic sclerosis, Sjogren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. It may also be a complication of rarer autoimmune conditions such as Bechet's syndrome, sarcoidosis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. All three stages of swallowing (oral, pharyngeal and oesophageal) may be impaired in these conditions. Both medical therapy and surgical intervention play an important role in the management of autoimmune dysphagia. The investigation and management of autoimmune dysphagia requires close collaboration between rheumatologists and otorhinolaryngologists. There is a need for further research to establish standardised guidelines on the assessment and management of autoimmune dysphagia.

Research on Advances in Early Rehabilitation Intervention for Dysphagia

Dysphagia is a common clinical symptom caused by various factors, significantly affecting patients’ quality of life and prognosis. This paper aims to review recent advancements in early rehabilitation intervention for dysphagia, covering the significance of early rehabilitation, standards for functional assessment of dysphagia, timing for early rehabilitation training, psychological care, and rehabilitation training methods. The importance and latest research findings on early rehabilitation intervention for dysphagia are comprehensively discussed to provide a reference for clinical practice.

Head and Neck Cancer Survivors' Assessment of Mealtimes: Translation and Validation : Assessment and Rehabilitation of Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Dysphagia is a prevalent complication before, during and after treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Besides the medical and societal consequences, dysphagia has a negative impact on functioning, activity, participation and quality of life. These aspects are all affected by the environmental factors (EF). However, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) such as the Head-and-Neck Cancer Survivors' Assessment of Mealtimes (HNSAM), which thoroughly assess participation and EF in addition to function and activity, are rare. Therefore, this study aimed to translate and validate the HNSAM into Dutch (D-HNSAM). The HNSAM was translated according to the standardized procedure of translation & back-translation and according to the international cross-cultural adaptation process. A pilot study was then conducted with 10 HNC patients to assess the linguistic features and comprehensibility of the test items. Finally, the D-HNSAM was completed by 50 participants who were at least 6months post-treatment for HNC. The Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck cancer patients (PSS-HN)- subscales normalcy of diet and eating in public, the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI), the Functional Oral Intake scale (FOIS) and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) were used to examine the psychometric properties of the D-HNSAM. High correlations with related assessment tools and low correlations with unrelated assessment tools were expected. Internal consistency was found to be weak to good. Test-retest reliability, convergent validity and divergent validity were demonstrated except for the EF subscale. The D-HNSAM can detect differences in impact of dysphagia on daily functioning and quality of life. The D-HNSAM is a reliable and clinically valuable PROM for assessing the impact of dysphagia on daily functioning and quality of life in patients with HNC. The unique aspect of this PROM, the subscale EF, has unfortunately weak psychometric properties and requires further refinement.

A survey of dysphagia services practice in China.

Dysphagia services have only recently been formalised within Chinese health services. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia services practice in China. To provide a profile for the dysphagia practice in China by assessing various facets of dysphagia services. This is a survey study carried out from December 2022 to May 2023 online in China. One hundred fifty-nine respondents comprising doctors, nurses or therapists involved in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation completed a questionnaire via Sojump. The questionnaire included dichotomous (e.g., yes/no) and multiple-choice questions related to participants' general information and their provision of dysphagia management services. Results were analysed descriptively and the differences among different levels of hospitals were analysed. Approximately two-thirds of hospitals (67.9%) started dysphagia services within the last 5 years. A significant difference in the initiation of dysphagia rehabilitation was observed across different hospital levels (χ2=32.70;p<0.001). Routine dysphagia screening was a standard practice in most hospitals (71.7%), with the most frequently employed screening method being the water swallow test (95.6%). Clinical swallowing evaluation emerged as the preferred initial assessment method (80.5%) and the most utilised assessment method (91.8%). Video fluoroscopic swallow study and flexible endoscopic evaluation swallowing were used by 22.7% and 12.6% of respondents. A significant difference was observed in the choice of assessment methods across hospitals of different levels (χ2=43.397; p < 0.001). The majority of respondents (53.5%) primarily employed rehabilitation as the main intervention method (76%-100%). Most respondents indicated that they would reevaluate patients after treatment (74.8%) and reported routine follow-up with patients (60.4%). Despite the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. However, the use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes. There is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China. What is already known on this subject Assessment and treatment methods for dysphagia are various across different patients, medical facilities and settings. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia rehabilitation practice in China. What this study adds to existing knowledge The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China through an online survey. We found that the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, but the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. Variations in practice patterns between hospitals of different levels may be attributed to resource constraints and patient needs. Besides, while rehabilitation exercises are the primary intervention method for dysphagia in China, the assessment largely centres on clinical swallowing evaluation. The use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes. What are the clinical implications of this work? The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China, and the results indicate that the use of instrumental assessments needs to be improved and there is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.

Dysphagia assessment in patients with multiple sclerosis - an additional piece to disability burden.

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) might experience symptoms that are usually underestimated. Dysphagia should be evaluated within the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), but clinicians often do not assess it properly. The objectives of this study are as follows: To assess the prevalence of dysphagia in patients with MS utilizing the Swallowing Disturbance Questionnaire (SDQ); to examine the correlation with the EDSS; to investigate the relationship between dysphagia and clinico-demographic characteristics of MS. In total, 177 MS patients underwent evaluations with EDSS, SDQ, cognitive functions, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep quality tests. We compared clinico-demographic data of patients with and without dysphagia and native-EDSS to SDQ-EDSS. Out of the 177 MS patients, 56% of individuals were identified having dysphagia according to the SDQ with 41 patients exhibiting mild dysphagia, 31 showing moderate dysphagia and 27 patients having severe dysphagia. Only 6 patients had dysphagia recorded in the EDSS. SDQ-EDSS scores were significantly higher than native scores. Dysphagia was associated with depressive symptoms and sleep quality. Dysphagia affects up to 56% of MS patients. The SDQ questionnaire is useful for identifying dysphagia, which can help in capturing disease progression and preventing complications like aspiration pneumonia. The SDQ-EDSS was higher than the native-EDSS, reflecting the poor ability of the native-EDSS to evaluate certain symptoms such as dysphagia. The SDQ correlated with depressive symptoms, which are associated with a greater perception of MS symptoms, and poor sleep quality, which could be associated with the triggering of pathogenic mechanisms responsible for disease progression.

Amplifying Influence: Unveiling the Dynamic Role of Speech and Language Therapists within ICPOP Specialist Community Teams across Ireland

Abstract Background Integrated Care Programme for Older People (ICPOP) provide services for people with complex needs requiring specialist community multidisciplinary assessment and intervention. This national programme aims to shift care from hospitals, toward communities. As of October 2023, 23 of 30 planned ICPOP teams have been established (Butler, 2023). The Irish Association for Speech and Language Therapists, recommend speech and language therapists (SLT) be included on all frailty intervention teams across all service areas, ensuring equal access regardless of geographical area. Currently 10 ICPOP teams have an SLT in post. The contribution of SLT within these teams remains unstudied. Understanding the role of SLTs within ICPOP, exploring similarities and differences, is essential for informing professional clinical guidelines and practice. Methods This study utilised an anonymous, non-experimental, cross-sectional survey design. The survey design incorporated the Tailored Research Method to enhance response rates. Survey Monkey (http://www.surveymonkey. com) was used to create and disseminate the open survey. All SLTs working on ICPOP teams were invited to participate. Results Findings highlight the diverse roles and responsibilities of SLTs within ICPOP. While some commonalities were observed in services provided by SLTs, such as dysphagia assessment and communication support, variations existed based on team location, setting, and individual professional experience. The majority of SLTs participated in non SLT specific activities such as triaging, conducting assessments and administrative duties. Rural SLTs faced challenges related to resources and coordination of care. Urban SLTs had greater access to specialist instrumental assessments. Conclusion This study underscores the importance of recognising and addressing the varied roles of SLTs within ICPOP teams to guide professional guidelines and promote consistency. By understanding the unique challenges and opportunities faced by SLTs in different geographical and organisational contexts, policymakers and healthcare leaders can better support professionals to meet the diverse needs of older individuals across Ireland.

Clinical, Patient And Service Outcomes For Patients In A Rehabilitation Hospital With An Onsite Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation Of Swallowing Service

Abstract Background Dysphagia has been reported in almost half of hospital patients who are over 65 years.1 In 2023 a Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) service was introduced into the hospital. The purpose of this study was to profile the patients who were referred for FEES and determine the prevalence and severity of dysphagia. Methods Information on patient diagnosis, dysphagia related clinical outcome measures and waiting times when compared to Videofluoroscopy referral were collected from 30 patients who attended for FEES assessment in a rehabilitation hospital from August 2023 - May 2024. Results 97% of the patients who engaged in FEES were above the age of 65. Patients presented with a range of diagnoses including frailty (20%), progressive neurological conditions (18%), other (16.6%), stroke (13.3%), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (13.3%), Acquired Brain Injury (3%), Gastroenterology (3%), and surgical (3%). Dysphagia was identified in 97% of patients, with 60% presenting within the moderate to severe range on the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures. 33% of patients presented with silent aspiration, with a third of these patients presenting as clinically asymptomatic. Following FEES evaluation, 40% of patients were recommended a change in diet texture or fluid consistency, with 54% and 70% of these patients being recommended a downgrade in diet or fluids respectively. The service has allowed for more timely access to instrumental swallow assessment with completion of FEES within an average of 4 days compared to referral for Videofluoroscopy; 24 days average. Conclusion This study has enabled us to profile patients accessing FEES. FEES facilitates quicker access to instrumental swallow assessment and identification of aspiration. It has also enabled targeted person centered dysphagia rehab. Reference 1. Doan, T.N et al (2022) Prevalence and methods for assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(9), p.2605.

Reflux, eosinophilic esophagitis, and celiac disease - the blurred lines.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a commonly recognized cause of dysphagia. Conversely, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and celiac disease are rarer and often overlooked as dysphagia culprits. Overlap between these conditions complicates diagnosis and delays appropriate treatment. This review aims to clarify the distinctive dysphagia characteristics in each condition, explore potential overlaps, and offer guidance on differentiation. Recent studies have advanced our understanding of dysphagia mechanisms in GERD, EoE, and celiac disease, particularly in characterizing disordered motility and dysphagia's natural history. While upper endoscopy, biopsies, and manometry remain crucial in dysphagia assessment, novel diagnostic tools are emerging. New insights highlight the significance of cytokine-induced mucosal injury in all three conditions, revealing potential connections where mucosal damage in one disorder may contribute to the development of others. GERD, EoE, and celiac disease can coexist and present with similar symptoms. Distinguishing between them often entails upper endoscopy, esophageal biopsies, pH testing, and celiac serologies. EoE should be considered when GERD patients fail proton pump inhibitor therapy or when celiac patients have persistent esophageal symptoms despite a gluten-free diet. Consider celiac disease if dysphagia accompanies iron deficiency anemia, malabsorptive diarrhea, or osteoporosis. Recognizing the potential overlap between these conditions is crucial for guiding clinical evaluation and therapy.

Noninstrumental Dysphagia Assessment and Screening: A Proposed Checklist.

In the field of dysphagia research, there is a need to establish a framework for the critical appraisal of methodological reporting. A working group was formed to develop a tool to aid in such critical appraisal across various domains of dysphagia research (called the FRONTIERS [Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing] Framework). The goal of the current paper is to present and describe one domain of this tool: noninstrumental assessment and screening tools. Methods describing the development of the FRONTIERS Framework and the associated tool are detailed in the prologue of this series. A set of questions specific to the critical appraisal of transparency and rigor of research involving noninstrumental screening and assessment tools was developed. This included 13 "yes/no" questions, each of which is presented with a rationale for its inclusion and an example of its implementation. The use of this framework will serve researchers and those appraising the quality of research that uses noninstrumental dysphagia assessment and screening tools. More broadly, the FRONTIERS Framework will facilitate improved rigor and transparency across dysphagia research. Special considerations and future goals are discussed.

Evaluation of Psychometric Proprieties of Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) in Italian Language: A Cross-Sectional Study.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) in post-stroke individuals. The original MASA scale was translated and culturally adapted from English to Italian following the international guidelines. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the MASA-IT were assessed, and its concurrent validity was examined through Pearson correlation coefficients with the Italian versions of two established gold standard scales for dysphagia assessment: the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (DOSS) and the De Pippo Test-Three Oz Water Swallow. The MASA-IT was administered to 78 participants. The items demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.86 and 0.89. The interclass correlation coefficient was 0.98 for inter-rater reliability and 0.99 for intra-rater reliability, indicating high reproducibility. Regarding concurrent validity, the MASA-IT showed a strong direct correlation with the DOSS scale (r = 0.949, p = 0.01) and an inverse correlation with the De Pippo Test (r = -0.783, p = 0.01), confirming its good concurrent validity. The Italian version of the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA-IT) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing swallowing ability in post-stroke patients. Its strong psychometric properties make it well suited for clinical use in Italy.

Table-mounted Versus Self-retaining Retraction: An Assessment of Postoperative Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

Retrospective study. To determine whether there are significant differences in postoperative dysphagia when using table-mounted versus self-retaining retractor tools. Retraction of prevertebral structures during anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) is commonly associated with postoperative dysphagia or dysphonia. Retractors commonly used include nonfixed self-retaining retraction devices or fixed table-mounted retractor arms. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding differences in dysphagia between retractor types. Patients who underwent ACSS and adhered to a minimum of 6-month follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared between table-mounted and self-retaining retractor groups at the preoperative and final postoperative time points, including the SWAL-QOL survey for dysphagia. Categorical dysphagia was assessed using previously defined values for the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Overall, 117 and 75 patients received self-retaining or table-mounted retraction. Average follow-up was significantly longer in the self-retaining cohort (14.8±15.0mo) than in the table-mounted group (9.4±7.8, P=0.005). No differences were detected in swallowing function (P=0.918) or operative time (P=0.436), although 3-level procedures were significantly shortened with table-mounted retraction (P=0.005). Multivariate analysis trended toward worse swallow function with increased operative levels (P=0.072) and increased retraction time (P=0.054), although the retractor used did not predict swallowing function (P=0.759). However, categorical rates of postoperative dysphagia were lower with table-mounted retraction (13.3% vs. 27.4%, P=0.033). There was no significant difference observed in long-term swallowing dysfunction between patients who underwent ACSS with self-retaining and table-mounted retractors, although the rate of dysphagia was lower with table-mounted retraction. In addition, the greater number of operated levels per case in the table-mounted group at a similar time suggests improved efficiency.

Impact of Prehabilitation With Preoperative Swallowing Exercises on Postoperative Swallowing Morbidity in Oral Cavity Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Oral cancer surgery and the associated reconstructive procedures cause mechanical and neurological impairment of swallowing. Despite postoperative rehabilitation, functional impairment of swallowing remains a concern. This study is to investigate the potential benefits of prehabilitation with preoperative swallowing exercises to patients undergoing composite resections and compartmental tongue resections so that it results in better swallowing outcomes and improved quality of life after surgery. Sixty patients included in the study were randomized into an exercise and control group of 30 each. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity undergoing composite resection or compartmental tongue resections were included, and patients with severe trismus at presentation were excluded. Patients in the exercise group were instructed on a set of six active exercises to be followed strictly for a period of at least 1week before surgery. Preoperative swallowing exercises comprised of evidence-based exercises targeting the muscle groups involved in swallowing. Postoperative swallowing rehabilitation was the same as that of the control group. Patients were assessed after 6months of surgery. Outcomes were assessed both subjectively and objectively. Objective assessment was done by inexpensive, novel clinical methods of repetitive saliva swallow test (RSST), water swallow test (WST) and food swallow test (FST) to and graded using dysphagia severity scale (1-7). Average oral intake scale (1-Oral solids, 2-Oral semisolids/easy to chew foods, 3-Oral liquids only and 4-Non-oral, orogastric tube dependent) assessed subjectively was significantly lower in exercise arm, and the control arm had a significantly higher OIS score. Exercise arm had higher number of patients in DSS scores of 5, 6 and 7. The control arm had a higher number of patients in DSS scores of 3 and 4. The differences between the two groups were found to be statistically significant taking into consideration the confounding factors of radiation, wound morbidity and tongue resections. Preoperative swallowing exercises have shown a positive impact on postoperative swallowing ability. This is the first randomized trial to assess the effect of PSE in postoperative oral cancer patients. Our exercise protocol needs standardization, and clinical objective method of dysphagia assessment requires further validation. However, prehabilitation with PSE has the potential to improve the quality of life in oral cancer patients.

Narrative review of diagnosis, management and treatment of dysphagia and sialorrhea in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The degenerative motor neuron disorder amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) frequently leads bulbar symptoms like dysarthria, dysphagia, and sialorrhea, in approximately one-third of cases being the initial symptom. Throughout the disease, more than two-thirds of ALS patients experience dysphagia, regardless of the region of onset. In this review, we aimed to offer an updated overview of dysphagia and sialorrhea in ALS, covering its diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment in clinical practice. Regular assessment of dysphagia and sialorrhea during each patient visit is essential and should be a standard aspect of ALS care. Early discussion of potential treatments such as high-calorie diets or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is crucial. Furthermore, this review highlights and discusses potential areas for improvement in both clinical practice and research.

Assessment and management of dysphagia in the neonatal intensive care units in India: A survey report

BackgroundEvidence-based assessment and management of dysphagia in neonates, especially those in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), are limited. Understanding existing clinical practices may be the first step toward developing a consensus. The current study aimed to identify clinical practice patterns of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in India towards facilitating the development of feeding skills and assessment and management of dysphagia among neonates. MethodAn electronic survey questionnaire comprising 46 questions categorized into two main sections (demographics and a hypothetical case scenario) was emailed to 35 SLPs practicing in the NICU. The hypothetical clinical case was created to include considerations of assessment and management of dysphagia in the NICU, and the participants answered questions about clinical decision-making. ResultsAs many as 22 individuals completed the survey. The responses were analyzed descriptively to identify themes and trends in practice patterns. Our results revealed varied practice patterns in the clinical swallowing assessment and management approaches for neonatal dysphagia. ConclusionThere is a need to develop a consensus statement and standard guidelines for the assessment and intervention for dysphagia by the SLP in the NICU. Translation of current evidence-based research into clinical practice is critical to patient care.

Profile of oropharyngeal swallowing in healthy Brazilian adults and older adults

ObjectivesTo describe the findings of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES) in asymptomatic young and older adults, comparing results across different age groups. Additionally, this study aims to test the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) as an instrument to identify dysphagia risk. MethodsA prospective cross-sectional observational analysis was conducted on a sample of individuals aged 20 and above, asymptomatic for dysphagia, stratified by age groups. The EAT-10 questionnaire was completed, and the FEES was employed to assess oropharyngeal swallowing function. Various parameters, including salivary stasis, swallowing reflex trigger, swallowing sequence, residue, penetration, and aspiration were blindly analyzed by two otolaryngologists. ResultsA total of 184 participants were included, with a mean age of 44.7 ± 18.5 years. There was good to excellent agreement between examiners for FEES parameters. The EAT-10 score ≥3 suggested dysphagia risk in 7.6% (n = 14) of the sample, with no association with age or any FEES parameter. Individuals aged ≥80 years presented more residue (50%; n = 5/10) compared to younger individuals (11.5%; n = 20/174; p = 0.039). Salivary stasis was found exclusively in individuals aged ≥60 years (n = 5/39; 12.8%; p = 0.027). Age did not influence on the swallowing reflex trigger, swallowing sequence, penetration, and aspiration. Penetration was observed in 4.9% (n = 9) of subjects and aspiration occurred in 0.5% (n = 1) of subjects, with no statistical significance in age groups. ConclusionAge does not have a linear influence on swallowing in healthy adults and elderly people. However, individuals aged ≥80 years showed a higher prevalence of residue, and individuals aged ≥60 years showed a higher prevalence of salivary stasis, suggesting an increased risk or presence of dysphagia. Other FEES parameters were not influenced by age. These findings provide valuable insights into the nuanced dynamics of swallowing across different age groups, emphasizing the importance of age-specific considerations in dysphagia assessment. Level of evidence4.

Aspiration pneumonia in nursing literature-a mapping review.

Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is an infection of the lungs caused by inhalation of material. The reported incidences vary across literature and clinical populations and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management of AP is best carried out by a multidisciplinary team. This aim of this review was to collate and describe the available evidence on AP to develop a greater understanding of the concept of AP as it is represented in the nursing literature. As a collaborative team, we undertook the six stages of a systematic mapping review. We searched for the term aspiration pneumonia in 200 peer reviewed nursing journals across 10 databases, over a ten-year period (2013-2023). In this review, 293 papers were coded. Dysphagia, oral health and tube feeding emerged as the most frequent risk factors for AP, and the most reported factors for preventing this condition. Mortality was the most commonly described consequence of AP, followed by hospitalisations and morbidity. Multiple management approaches were reported including dysphagia assessment, risk evaluation, oral care and texture modification of food and fluids. The role of nurses and interprofessional collaborations were described. Despite limited evidence related to the topic of AP in the nursing literature, the complexity of the causes, prevention, management and consequences of AP emerged. Certain factors, such as dysphagia, oral health, and tube feeding, were described under prevention, cause and management of AP. The importance of multidisciplinary approach in the management and prevention of AP was presented.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Treatment for Gastric Tube Cancer After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

The long-term outcomes of gastric tube cancer (GTC) are unclear. This study therefore aimed to clarify clinicopathologic features and the long-term outcomes of patients with GTC. The 25 patients who were diagnosed with GTC between April 2003 and December 2022 at our hospital were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study, and this included 27 lesions. We retrospectively evaluated clinicopathologic factors based on hospital records. In our cohort, 88% of incidences of GTC were located in the middle or lower gastric tube. As the treatment of GTC, we used endoscopic submucosal dissection, gastrectomy, chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and best supportive care for 16 (59%), 6 (22%), 1 (4%), 1 (4%), and 3 (11%) lesions, respectively. Perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection was observed in 6 of the 16 lesions. Partial gastric tube resection was performed for 3 patients and total gastric tube resection was performed for 3 patients. One patient who underwent total gastric tube resection died due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. In survival analysis, the 3-year overall survival rate was 52% and the 3-year disease-specific survival rate was 74%. Five patients (20%) died of aspiration pneumonia, 2 patients (8%) of another disease, and 1 patient (4%) of another type of cancer. According to multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for overall survival were cN status (HR, 18.021; P =0.004) and complication of aspiration pneumonia (HR, 8.373; P =0.004). The occurrence of aspiration pneumonia and cN status were prognostic factors after the treatment for GTC. Assessment of dysphagia and surveillance after treatment for GTC are important to improve the prognosis.

PROFILE OF DYSPHAGIA IN ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS

Background: Stroke has been a leading cause of mortality and disability since 2013, and its incidence continues to rise. Dysphagia is a common complication following stroke, contributing to increased rates of aspiration, pneumonia, and prolonged hospital stays for stroke patients. Objective: This study aims to investigate the profile and distribution of acute stroke patients experiencing dysphagia who are admitted to RSUD dr. Saiful Anwar in East Java. Methods: The assessment was conducted on acute stroke patients with compos mentis consciousness in the Stroke Unit from July to September 2023, using the GUSS (Gugging Swallowing Screen) questionnaire. The assessment categories included no dysphagia (20), mild dysphagia (15-19), moderate dysphagia (10-14), and severe dysphagia (0-9). Results: Data collected during the period from July to September 2023 yielded a total of 35 samples. Based on gender, there were 22 male patients (62.9%) and 13 female patients (37.1%). Regarding age distribution, 15 patients fell into the productive age range (20 to 59 years), while 20 patients were over 60 years old. The majority of cases were ischemic strokes, with 25 patients, and 10 patients had hemorrhagic strokes. Dysphagia assessment using the GUSS method on the 35 samples revealed 2 samples with GUSS scores of 12 and 14 (moderate) and 1 sample with a score of 18 (mild). Conclusion: The profile and distribution of acute stroke patients experiencing dysphagia were identified, including gender, age, type of stroke, and GUSS scores in acute stroke patients in the stroke unit with Compos Mentis consciousness.

Awareness of Rehabilitation Services Related to Dysphagia among Speech-language Pathologist

Abstract Background: Feeding is the process which includes preparation of food in the mouth, sucking, munching, and swallowing. Dysphagia is a difficulty in swallowing. Speech-language pathologist (SLP) has an important role in the evaluation and rehabilitation of dysphagia. Objective: The objective of the study was to carry out the survey on awareness of rehabilitation services related to dysphagia among SLPs. Methodology: Fifty SLPs who have completed postgradation and have minimum 1 year of experience were selected for the study. A questionnaire having 10 closed-ended questions related to dysphagia was given to the participants. Responses were collected and analyzed. Results: SLPs were working in the different setups and have seen different types of cases. They have used a variety of instruments and techniques for the assessment and management of dysphagia. Conclusion: SLPs are there to help in dysphagia rehabilitation that addresses the requirement of dysphagia management. Management of dysphagia is a developing trend in states and SLPs accept this new trend and accountability of rehabilitation with this population.