AbstractAlthough intricate structural assemblies contribute to enhancing the activity of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction (ECR) to C2+ products, blindly coupling multiple design strategies may not yield the expected results, and even inhibit the activity of intrinsic catalytic sites. Therefore, elucidating the promoting or inhibitory effects of each design strategy on the CO2‐to‐C2+ conversion to clarify the real active sites and dynamic oxidation processes is of paramount importance. Here, commonly used grain boundaries (GBs), oxidation states, and alloying strategies are focused on, constructing four different types of catalysts structures: original Cu GBs, oxygen‐enriched grain boundary oxidation (GBO), Ag‐enriched GBO, and Cu/Ag GBs. Multiple operando characterizations reveal that GBs and GBO strengthen the resistance of the oxidative Cu species to the electrochemical reduction. The in situ generated strongly oxidative hydroxyl radicals alter the local reaction environment on the catalyst surface, inducing and stabilizing oxidative Cuδ+ species. Catalytic activity comparisons indicate that the oxidation state of Cu plays a decisive role in the CO2‐to‐C2+ conversion, and the nanoalloy effect tends to favor the CH4 production in intricate GBs assemblies. Theoretical calculations suggest that weak CO adsorption on GBO structures facilitates hydrogenation, promoting C–C coupling toward C2+ products.