Durotomy In Spine Surgery Research Articles

The hidden risk: Intracranial hemorrhage following durotomies in spine surgery

ObjectiveIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after durotomy in elective spine surgery, though rare, can pose a significant risk to patient outcomes. Spine surgeries bear a risk of dural tears (DT) with potential of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (PCSFL). Excessive PCSFL can precipitate a decrease in intracranial pressure, potentially leading to ICH. Literature on ICH as a postoperative complication is scarce. The aim was to assess the incidence and risk factors of ICH in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. MethodsUtilizing the 2020 National Impatient Sample (NIS) adults (>18 years) were selected by primary procedure category codes for spine fusion, discectomy, spinal cord decompression and cervicothoracic/lumbosacral nerve decompression. Exclusion criteria were trauma and malignancy. The primary outcome was occurrence of ICH. Comparative analysis and a multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent risk. ResultsIn total, 40,990 patients met our criteria with an incidence of ICH at 0.08%. The ICH-group showed an increased length of stay and higher mortality compared to the control group. Spinal cord decompression, DT and PCSFL were significantly more frequent in patients with ICH. Alcohol, drug abuse and hypertension were significantly more prevalent in patients with ICH. DT, alcohol abuse and hypertension were independent risk factors for ICH. ConclusionsThis study underscores the rarity and severity of ICHs following elective spine surgery, emphasizing awareness and looking for possible preventive measures. Our finding suggests that DT, as a complication of surgical techniques, as well as alcohol abuse and hypertension are significant predictors of ICH.

Incidence and risk factors for incidental durotomy in spine surgery for lumbar stenosis and herniated disc.

Incidental durotomy (ID) is one of the most common complications in degenerative surgery. Due to the negative consequences of ID, knowledge about incidence and risk factors is warranted. A total of 1,139 surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis (LS) and lumbar herniated disc (LDH) were included from the spine surgery database: DaneSpine. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed for the assessment of possible risk factors. ID occurred in 10.4% of the surgical procedures. A multivariate regression analysis revealed an increased relative risk of ID by 2% per year of age, 58% by revision surgery, and 55% by decompression on multiple levels. In our single-centre cohort study, one in ten patients experiences an ID. Increasing age, revision surgery and decompression of multiple levels are risk factors of ID in degenerative surgery of the lumbar spine.

Simulation of Dural Repair in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery With the Use of a Perfusion-Based Cadaveric Model.

In an era of curtailed work hours and concerns over achieving technical proficiency in the repertoire of procedures necessary for independent practice, many residencies have turned to model simulation as an educational adjunct. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair after inadvertent durotomy in spine surgery is a fundamental skillset for any spine surgeon. While primary closure with suture is not always necessary for small durotomies, larger defects, on the other hand, must be repaired. However, the dire consequences of inadequate repair dictate that it is generally performed by the most experienced surgeon. Few intraoperative opportunities, therefore, exist for CSF leak repair by trainees. To simulate dural repair in spine surgery using minimal-access techniques. A cohort of 8 neurosurgery residents was evaluated on their durotomy repair efforts in a perfusion-based cadaveric model. Study participants demonstrated consistent improvement across trials, with a significant reduction in closure times between their initial (12 min, 7 sec±4 min, 43 sec) and final attempts (7 min, 4 sec±2 min, 6 sec; P=.02). Moreover, all trainees-irrespective of postgraduate year-were able to accomplish robust dural closures resistant to simulated Valsalva maneuvers. Participants reported high degrees of model realism and exhibited significant increases in postprocedure confidence scores. Our results support use of perfusion-based simulation models as a complement to neurosurgery training, as it affords unrestricted opportunities for honing psychomotor skillsets when resident learning is increasingly being challenged by work-hour limitations and stricter oversight in the context of value-based healthcare.

The Economic Implications of an Incidental Durotomy.

Case-control. The aim of this study was to determine the economic impact of an incidental durotomy in spine surgery. An incidental durotomy during spine surgery does not affect long-term outcomes, but as reimbursement moves toward bundled payments, it may substantially affect the profitability of spine surgery. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected morbidity and mortality database identified all patients with an incidental durotomy between January 1, 2012, and January 11, 2013. Subjects with a dural tear were matched to controls (1 : 2) without a dural tear, and the total charges for one year were collected. Controls were required to meet the following criteria: Age ±5 years; Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ±1; Date of surgery ±2 years; Exact region of the spine, but not the exact level (i.e., lumbar → lumbar); Exact type of fusion (i.e., approach, instrumentation); Exact number of levels fused; Use of rhBMP-2; Number of levels decompressed ±1. Two controls without a dural tear could be identified for 57 patients who sustained an incidental durotomy. No difference in demographic data, emergency room visits, hospital readmissions, or revision surgeries between the groups was identified. Patients with an incidental durotomy had a longer operative time by 30.6 ± 8.5 minutes (P < 0.01), longer length of stay by 0.89 ± 0.27 days (P = 0.0001), and an increase in their average initial hospital charge by 18%. No increase in surgeon-based charges or hospital-based charges after the initial visit was identified. An incidental durotomy significantly increases the initial hospital charges for patients undergoing spine surgery; however, in this study it has no effect on surgeon-based charges or on hospital-based charges after discharge. 3.

Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Rates with Subfascial Epidural Drain Placement after Intentional Durotomy in Spine Surgery.

Study Design Retrospective chart review. Objective Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a known complication of intraoperative durotomy. Intraoperative placement of subfascial epidural drains following primary dural repair has been proposed as a potential management strategy to prevent formation of CSF cutaneous fistula and symptomatic pseudomeningocele. Here we describe our experience with subfascial drain after intentional durotomy. Methods Medical records of patients who underwent placement of subfascial epidural drains during spinal procedures with intentional intraoperative durotomies over a 4-year period at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative CSF cutaneous fistula or symptomatic pseudomeningocele formation. Results Twenty-five patients were included. Mean length of follow-up was 9.5 months. Twelve patients (48%) underwent simultaneous arthrodesis. The average duration of the drain was 5.3 days with average daily output of 126.5 mL. Subgroup analyses revealed that average drain duration for the arthrodesis group was 6.33 days, which is significantly greater than that of the nonfused group, which was 3.7 days (p = 0.016). Similarly, the average daily drain output for the arthrodesis subgroup at 153.1 mL was significantly higher than that of the nonfused subgroup (86.8 mL, p = 0.04). No patient developed postoperative CSF cutaneous fistula or symptomatic pseudomeningocele or had negative sequelae associated with overdrainage of CSF. One patient had a delayed wound infection. Conclusions The intraoperative placement of subfascial epidural drains was not associated with postoperative development of CSF cutaneous fistula, symptomatic pseudomeningocele, overdrainage, or subdural hematoma in the cases reviewed. Subfascial closed wound drain placement is a safe and efficacious management method after intentional spinal durotomies. It is particularly helpful in those who undergo simultaneous arthrodesis, as those patients have statistically higher daily drain output and longer drain durations.

Technical Note: Inlay-Onlay Sandwich Graft Technique for Repairing Durotomy in Spine Surgery for Fragile Dura

Incidental durotomy and cerebrospinal fluid leak in spine surgery is a common, well described complication encountered in spine surgery that can have good outcomes with prompt recognition and appropriate repair or management. Additional levels of technical challenge arise when the dura is very thin and fails to hold suture lines in primary repair. We present three lumbar-spine cases with dural opening, intended or unintended, in the setting of thin native dura providing poor suture substrate. In each case, inlay-onlay sandwich graft technique was used to achieve a successful lasting dural closure. Two of these cases initially involved delayed failure of primary suture repair or standard basic dural draft. Re-exploration in these two cases revealed widened suture defects due to fragile native dura, resulting in delayed post-operative CSF leak. We also report a case of inlay-onlay sandwich patch graft for initial dural closure in adult tethered cord release in the setting of thin native dura, in which simple primary closure was not feasible. We illustrate this inlayonlay graft operative technique, which can potentially be used for repairing dural openings involving thin native dura without intrinsic tissue strength to support primary suture repair. We envision that this technique can also be further extrapolated or adapted to other regions of dural repair as needed.

Technical Note: Inlay-Onlay Sandwich Graft Technique for Repairing Durotomy in Spine Surgery for Fragile Dura

Technical Note: Inlay-Onlay Sandwich Graft Technique for Repairing Durotomy in Spine Surgery for Fragile Dura

Incidental durotomy in spine surgery: first aid in ten steps.

Incidental durotomy (ID) is the most common complication of spine surgery. Revision procedures, ossification of the yellow ligament, or synovial cysts are well-known risk factors. The size, shape, and severity of ID are unpredictable, ranging from a pinpoint hole to a several centimeters large dural laceration with transected fibers following the slippage of a cutting burr. Furthermore, the occurrence of ID is always unexpected. Intra-operative management is often based on a steep learning curve rather than a structured scheme. To provide an intra-operative ten-step closure technique (10ST) for IDs of varying severity. A database of 4020 consecutive surgeries for lumbar degenerative disease over the past 4 years was searched for ID. The records of 176 patients were analyzed. Two dural repair techniques were compared: the "individual" technique (InT) and the 10ST. The overall prevalence of ID was 4.4%. The prevalence was lowest in virgin micro-discectomies (1.7%) and ranged from 3.6% in decompression for spinal canal stenosis up to 14.5% in revision procedures. All surgeries were performed with the aid of a microscope. Among 107 primary surgeries, the InT achieved a single-stage closure of the ID in 96 procedures (89.7%). Among 20 virgin surgeries, the 10ST was successful in all cases (P = 0.21). Among 42 re-do procedures following failed attempts to stop cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, the InT achieved single-stage closure in 36 procedures (85.7%). The 10ST was successful in all 26 cases (P = 0.03). The follow-up was 1 year. The 10ST should be considered for successful single-stage closure in primary repair of ID.

Cost analysis of incidental durotomy in spine surgery.

Retrospective database analysis. To characterize the consequences of an incidental durotomy with regard to perioperative complications and total hospital costs. There is a paucity of data regarding how an incidental durotomy and its associated complications may relate to total hospital costs. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried from 2008 to 2011. Patients who underwent cervical or lumbar decompression and/or fusion procedures were identified, stratified by approach, and separated into cohorts based on a documented intraoperative incidental durotomy. Patient demographics, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index), length of hospital stay, perioperative outcomes, and costs were assessed. Analysis of covariance and multivariate linear regression were used to assess the adjusted mean costs of hospitalization as a function of durotomy. The incidental durotomy rate in cervical and lumbar spine surgery is 0.4% and 2.9%, respectively. Patients with an incidental durotomy incurred a longer hospitalization and a greater incidence of perioperative complications including hematoma and neurological injury (P < 0.001). Regression analysis demonstrated that a cervical durotomy and its postoperative sequelae contributed an additional adjusted $7638 (95% confidence interval, 6489-8787; P < 0.001) to the total hospital costs. Similarly, lumbar durotomy contributed an additional adjusted $2412 (95% confidence interval, 1920-2902; P < 0.001) to the total hospital costs. The approach-specific procedural groups demonstrated similar discrepancies in the mean total hospital costs as a function of durotomy. This analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database demonstrates that incidental durotomies increase hospital resource utilization and costs. In addition, it seems that a cervical durotomy and its associated complications carry a greater financial burden than a lumbar durotomy. Further studies are warranted to investigate the long-term financial implications of incidental durotomies in spine surgery and to reduce the costs associated with this complication. 3.

Do surgeon credentials affect the rate of incidental durotomy during spine surgery

Incidental durotomy is a potential complication of spinal surgery which can cause a number of intra-operative and post-operative complications. The purpose of this study was to determine if the primary operator's credentials impacted on the incidence of durotomy intra-operatively. Prospectively collected data of operator credentials in relation to the incidence of durotomy were acquired from the International Eurospine Tango database. The significance of variability and risk factors between operators was measured using the Chi-squared test. Data from a total of 3,764 patients were captured from the Tango registry. Of these 162 (4.3%) had a durotomy. Of the total number of patients, the primary operator was neurosurgical in 1,369 (36.4%) cases; orthopaedic in 180 (4.8%) cases; other (pre-certification) in 236 (6.3%) cases; specialised spine surgeon in 1,741 (46.3%) cases; 6 cases had missing operator data. cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred in 57 (4.16%) of neurosurgeon-operated cases; 5 (2.78%) orthopaedic-operated cases; 19 (4.06%) of other surgeon-operated cases; and 81 (4.65%) in specialised spine surgeon-operated cases. Using Chi-squared test, the significance of the variation in incidence of CSF leak between primary operator groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.1405). From the data captured and analysed, the rate of durotomy ranged from 2.78 to 4.65% between operator groups with a mean rate of 4.3%. The primary operator credentials do not appear to significantly impact the rate of durotomy in spine surgery.

Incidence of Unintended Durotomy in Spine Surgery Based on 108 478 Cases

Unintended durotomy is a common complication of spinal surgery. However, the incidences reported in the literature vary widely and are based primarily on relatively small case numbers from a single surgeon or institution. To provide spine surgeons with a reliable incidence of unintended durotomy in spinal surgery and to assess various factors that may influence the risk of durotomy. We assessed 108,478 surgical cases prospectively submitted by members of the Scoliosis Research Society to a deidentified database from 2004 to 2007. Unintended durotomy occurred in 1.6% (1745 of 108 478) of all cases. The incidence of unintended durotomy ranged from 1.1% to 1.9% on the basis of preoperative diagnosis, with the highest incidence among patients treated for kyphosis (1.9%) or spondylolisthesis (1.9%) and the lowest incidence among patients treated for scoliosis (1.1%). The most common indication for spine surgery was degenerative spinal disorder, and among these patients, there was a lower incidence of durotomy for cervical (1.0%) vs thoracic (2.2%; P = .01) or lumbar (2.1%, P < .001) cases. Scoliosis procedures were further characterized by etiology, with the highest incidence of durotomy in the degenerative subgroup (2.2% vs 1.1%; P < .001). Durotomy was more common in revision compared with primary surgery (2.2% vs 1.5%; P < .001) and was significantly more common among elderly (> 80 years of age) patients (2.2% vs 1.6%; P = .006). There was a significant association between unintended durotomy and development of a new neurological deficit (P < .001). Unintended durotomy occurred in at least 1.6% of spinal surgeries, even among experienced surgeons. Our data provide general benchmarks of durotomy rates and serve as a basis for ongoing efforts to improve safety of care.

Incidental durotomy in spine surgery.

Retrospective review of a large series of patients who underwent spinal surgery at a single institution during a 10-year period. To further clarify the frequency of incidental durotomy during spine surgery, its treatment, associated complications, and results of long-term clinical follow-up. Incidental durotomy is a relatively common occurrence during spinal surgery. There remains significant concern about it despite reports of good associated clinical outcomes. There have been few large clinical series on the subject. A retrospective review was conducted of clinical and surgical records and radiographic data for consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery performed by the two senior surgeons from January 1989 through December 1998. A total of 2144 patients were reviewed, and 74 were found to have dural tears occurring during or before surgery. Incidental durotomy occurred at the time of surgery in 66 patients (3.1% overall incidence). Incidence varied according to the specific procedure performed but was highest in the group that underwent revision surgery. The incidence of clinically significant durotomies occurring during surgery but not identified at the time was 0.28%. All dural tears that occurred during surgery and were recognized (60 of 66) were repaired primarily. Pseudomeningoceles developed in five of the remaining six patients. All six patients had subsequent surgical repair of dural defects because of failure of conservative therapy. A mean follow-up of 22.4 months was available and showed good long-term clinical results for all patients. Incidental durotomy, if recognized and treated appropriately, does not lead to long-term sequelae.