Duration Of Longest Reflux Episode Research Articles

Feed thickener for infants up to six months of age with gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is common in infants, and feed thickeners are often used to manage it in infants as they are simple to use and perceived to be harmless. However, conflicting evidence exists to support the use of feed thickeners. To evaluate the use of feed thickeners in infants up to six months of age with GOR in terms of reduction in a) signs and symptoms of GOR, b) reflux episodes on pH probe monitoring or intraluminal impedance or a combination of both, or c) histological evidence of oesophagitis. We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 2), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 22 November 2016), Embase (1980 to 22 November 2016), and CINAHL (1982 to 22 November 2016). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials. We included randomised controlled trials if they examined the effects of feed thickeners as compared to unthickened feeds (no treatment or placebo) in treating GOR in term infants up to six months of age or six months of corrected gestational age for those born preterm. Two review authors independently identified eligible studies from the literature search. Two review authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessments of the eligible studies. Differences in opinion were resolved by discussion with a third review author, and consensus was reached among all three review authors. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. Eight trials recruiting a total of 637 infants met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. The infants included in the review were mainly formula-fed term infants. The trials were of variable methodological quality. Formula-fed term infants with GOR on feed thickeners had nearly two fewer episodes of regurgitation per day (mean difference -1.97 episodes per day, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.32 to -1.61; 6 studies, 442 infants, moderate-certainty evidence) and were 2.5 times more likely to be asymptomatic from regurgitation at the end of the intervention period (risk ratio 2.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.51; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome 5, 95% CI 4 to 13; 2 studies, 186 infants, low-certainty evidence) when compared to infants with GOR on unthickened feeds. No studies reported failure to thrive as an outcome. We found low-certainty evidence based on 2 studies recruiting 116 infants that use of feed thickeners improved the oesophageal pH probe parameters of reflux index (i.e. percentage of time pH < 4), number of reflux episodes lasting longer than 5 minutes, and duration of longest reflux episode. No major side effects were reported with the use of feed thickeners. Information was insufficient to conclude which type of feed thickener is superior. Gastro-oesophageal reflux is a physiological self resolving phenomenon in infants that does not necessarily require any treatment. However, we found moderate-certainty evidence that feed thickeners should be considered if regurgitation symptoms persist in term bottle-fed infants. The reduction of two episodes of regurgitation per day is likely to be of clinical significance to caregivers. Due to the limited information available, we were unable to assess the use of feed thickeners in infants who are breastfeeding or preterm nor could we conclude which type of feed thickener is superior.

Effect of anesthesia on gastroesophageal reflux in children: a study using BRAVO wireless pH study measurements.

Adult studies suggest conscious sedation increases gastroesophageal reflux (GER), but the role of anesthesia on GER in children is unclear. Our aim was to study the anesthesia effects on GER and pH study interpretation in children. Children undergoing BRAVO wireless pH capsule placement under anesthesia and study duration >36h were included. We evaluated the pH parameters (number of reflux episodes >5min, duration of longest reflux episode, time pH <4 and fraction time pH <4) at 1, 2, 6-h and total study duration blocks using 2 cutoff values (5.3% and 6%) for the worst day, average of both days, and 1st day alone. We compared time blocks to evaluate the effect of anesthesia on GER and the proportions of studies changing interpretation after excluding the 1st hour and 1st 2-h blocks to evaluate anesthesia effect on study interpretation. A total of 150 children were included. We found a significant increase on the pH parameters in the 1st hour compared to subsequent block times suggesting an effect of anesthesia on GER. We found no significant change in the proportion of studies interpreted as normal vs abnormal, however, excluding the initial 2h of the study would change the study interpretation from abnormal to normal in up to 5% of patients. We found an effect of anesthesia increasing the GER parameters mainly in the 1st hour and up to the first 6h of the study that may result in a change in the study interpretation.

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Gastroesophageal Reflux

The effect of surgically created gastroesophageal reflux on intrapleural pressures in dogs

The causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and respiratory disorders is not well understood. Previous experimental studies that investigated this relationship were performed in anesthetized animals and used artificial acidification of esophagus for simulation of GER. In this study, we investigated the impact of GER on intrapleural pressures (IPP) in conscious, unanesthetized dogs. After the induction of appropriate anesthesia, 5 purpose-bred mongrel dogs underwent reflux-creating surgery (partial cardiomyectomy). The presence of GER was confirmed by determining the reflux index (RI) and the duration of longest reflux episode (DLRE) after 24-h intraesophageal pH-metry. IP was monitored before and after cardiomyectomy using a subcutaneously placed telemetric implant with its pressure-sensor catheter tip inserted into the pleural space. Partial cardiomyectomy resulted in a significant increase in RI from a preoperative mean value of 0.38 +/- 0.21 to 7.52 +/- 2.56%, and DLRE from 1.22 +/- 1.12 to 36.80 +/- 12.71 min, as recorded by the proximal sensor of the pH probe. A similar trend was observed at the distal sensor. After cardiomyectomy, the negative inspiratory IPP significantly increased from 17.2 +/- 7.9 to 28.4 +/- 9.7 mm Hg. A similar effect was observed in the negative expiratory IPP. The negative inspiratory IPP had a significant correlation with both RI (R = 0.932) and DLRE (R = 0.899). Cardiomyectomy causes GER, the severity of which correlates with negative inspiratory IPP in a dog model. The suggested model allows for the investigation of the pathologic association of GER with respiratory disorders in conscious animals.

The effect of lumbar relief orthoses with abdominal compression on esophago-gastrointestinal motility

To investigate the effect of lumbar ortheses with abdominal compression on gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastrointestinal transit. In a prospective study 20 consecutive patients with lumbar syndrome treated with lumbar orthesis (10 female, 10 male, median age 54.6 years) were investigated for gastro-oesophageal reflux, mouth-to-cecum transit time (MCT), and whole-gut transit time. Gastro-oesophageal reflux was assessed performing an ambulatory pH metering of the distal oesophagus over a period of 10 h with and without ortheses on two separate study days. After positioning of the pH catheter patients ingested a liquid-solid test meal labelled with 10 g lactulose and 750 g indigocarmine to determine MCT with the hydrogen breath test and whole-gut transit by the first appearance of indigocarmine in the stool. Dyspepsia was assessed by using a standardized questionnaire. Lumbar ortheses induced a significant increase in reflux time (pH < 4) (8.1 vs 4.1%), total number of reflux episodes (102.5 vs 69.5) and duration of longest reflux episode (6.0 vs 3.7 min) (P < 0.05). 12 patients with ortheses revealed an increase in relative reflux time (2.1-24.5%, median: 8.2%) more than two standard deviations compared to previously obtained normal values. In these patients during ortheses dyspeptic symptoms correlated significantly with reflux time (r = 0.6; P < 0.05). In contrast, MCT and whole-gut transit time in patients with and without ortheses did not differ significantly (85 vs 85 min; 10.2 vs 9.6 h). Lumbar ortheses with abdominal compression, nowadays frequently used in the lumbar syndrome, produce gastro-oesophageal reflux associated with dyspepsia. Gastrointestinal transit time is not affected, though.

The influence of age on gastro-oesophageal reflux: a re-appraisal of the DeMeester scoring system.

The statistical evaluation of the influence of age on the pattern of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) identified by prolonged pH monitoring in asymptomatic subjects. Re-appraisal of the DeMeester scoring system for GOR. Prolonged pH monitoring was performed on 45 asymptomatic elderly adults with normal contrast oesophagogram, manometry and endoscopy. They included 36 males and nine females. The mean age was 66.6 years. The monitoring time ranged between 20 and 24 h, including one complete daily feeding cycle. GOR was defined as a reflux event with a pH of <4. The mean, standard deviation, kurtosis and skew were calculated for six parameters listed in the results. The mean values were compared with those of normal values determined by DeMeester et al. (in: Read NW, editor. Gastrointestinal motility: which test? 1989, pp. 43-52) from their study of 50 young healthy adults, and the t-test was applied to determine the statistical significance of differences. The 'null hypothesis' for each parameter was defined as 'the mean values of the elderly population are not statistically different from DeMeester's normal values'. The means (+/-SD) of six parameters studied in pH monitoring were as follows: supine reflux time as a percentage of total study time, 2.94+/-5.18%; upright reflux time as a percentage of total study time, 4.14+/-5.71%; total reflux time as a percentage of total study time, 3.5+/-4.38%; duration of longest reflux episode, 14.98+/-24.92 min; number of reflux episodes lasting >5 min, 1.76+/-2.75; total number of reflux episodes during study, 13.49+/-11.31. These results were significantly different from the normal values reported by DeMeester. In addition, the data for each individual parameter was grossly skewed, as well as kurtotic, which implied that the data did not represent a normally distributed population. Moreover, we believe that the equation used for calculation of the DeMeester score, is inappropriate. The null hypothesis is rejected as the mean values of these parameters in our group are significantly higher than those used as normal. This implies that the normal values defined by DeMeester would over-diagnose gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Moreover, we have found that the formula used to calculate the DeMeester's score is not according to the principle it is based on. DeMeester's system scoring is therefore inappropriate.

Simultaneous pH Recordings from Multiple Esophageal Sites in Children with and without Distal Gastroesophageal Reflux

SummaryWe made continuous, simultaneous recordings of esophageal pH from three sites in the esophageal body, for 18–24 h, in 11 children with normal prolonged distal esophageal pH studies (Group I) and in 14 children with abnormal distal esophageal pH recordings (Group II). A flexible catheter housing four antimony microelectrodes was used, and data were stored in a portable recorder. A computer allowed for evaluation of the percent of time esophageal pH was &lt;4.0, number of reflux episodes per hour, acid clearance time, and the duration of longest reflux episode. Recordings made while subjects were upright or recumbent could be distinguished and analyzed separately. In the recumbent position, comparison of pH recordings from distal, middle, and proximal esophageal pH electrodes in Group I showed significant decreases in the percent of time spent with pH &lt;4.0, reflux episodes per hour, acid clearance time, and duration of longest reflux episode in the proximal esophageal sites, with a near negligible total acid exposure in the most proximal electrode. In Group II subjects, however, comparison of recumbent recordings from distal, middle, and proximal esophagus indicates that the proximal esophagus is highly exposed to acid reflux and that the decrease in acid exposure from distal to proximal esophagus in reflux patients is not proportionally as great as that of Group I. The data suggest that in the recumbent position, the ability of the subjects with abnormal reflux scores to protect the upper esophagus is less than that of subjects with normal amounts of distal esophageal acid exposure.

Simultaneous pH recordings from multiple esophageal sites in children with and without distal gastroesophageal reflux.

We made continuous, simultaneous recordings of esophageal pH from three sites in the esophageal body, for 18-24 h, in 11 children with normal prolonged distal esophageal pH studies (Group I) and in 14 children with abnormal distal esophageal pH recordings (Group II). A flexible catheter housing four antimony microelectrodes was used, and data were stored in a portable recorder. A computer allowed for evaluation of the percent of time esophageal pH was less than 4.0, number of reflux episodes per hour, acid clearance time, and the duration of longest reflux episode. Recordings made while subjects were upright or recumbent could be distinguished and analyzed separately. In the recumbent position, comparison of pH recordings from distal, middle, and proximal esophageal pH electrodes in Group I showed significant decreases in the percent of time spent with pH less than 4.0, reflux episodes per hour, acid clearance time, and duration of longest reflux episode in the proximal esophageal sites, with a near negligible total acid exposure in the most proximal electrode. In Group II subjects, however, comparison of recumbent recordings from distal, middle, and proximal esophagus indicates that the proximal esophagus is highly exposed to acid reflux and that the decrease in acid exposure from distal to proximal esophagus in reflux patients is not proportionally as great as that of Group I. The data suggest that in the recumbent position, the ability of the subjects with abnormal reflux scores to protect the upper esophagus is less than that of subjects with normal amounts of distal esophageal acid exposure.