Duplex Arteriography Research Articles

Wide acquired arteriovenous fistula between main renal artery and interlobar vein treated with nephrectomy

AbstractA case of renal arteriovenous fistula between the main renal artery and interlobar vein diagnosed 25 years after percutaneous renal biopsy was presented. A 62-year-old female was referred to a urologist with dilatation of the left renal pyelocalyceal system diagnosed after abdominal ultrasonography, while intravenous urography did not confirm that finding. Historically, she underwent renal biopsy 25 years ago without any complication. Her hypertension was well controlled during the last 10 years, although three antihypertensive drugs with occasional additional diuretics were necessary during the last 6 months. Color Duplex Ultrasonography, arteriography and Multi-Slice Computed Tomography revealed the presence of renal arteriovenous fistula between the main renal artery and interlobar vein, as well as severe dilatation of all interlobar veins, renal, ovarian and adrenal vein on the left side. Urological and vascular surgeons operated to ligate the fistula and preserve the kidney. However, it was not possible to reach the fistula inside the kidney and nephrectomy was performed.

Limitations of and Lessons Learned from Clinical Experience of 1,020 Duplex Arteriography

Due to the inherent risks, deficiencies and cost associated with contrast arteriography (CA), our group has been utitilizing duplex arteriography (DA) for evaluating the arteries of the lower extremity for patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. In an effort to further explore the strengths and weaknesses of DA, we reviewed our evolving experience with DA from January 1, 1998, to January 1, 2005. The arterial segments starting from mid-abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries were studied in cross-sectional and longitudinal planes using a variety of scanheads of 7-4, 10-5, 12-5, 5-2 and 3-2 MHz extended operative frequency range to obtain high-quality B-mode, color and power Doppler images as well as velocity spectra. In 906 patients, 1,020 duplex arteriograms were obtained. The ages ranged from 30-98 years old with a mean of 73+/-11 (SD) years. Fifty percent of the patients were diabetics. Indications for the examination included: tissue loss (409), rest pain (221), claudication (310), acute ischemia (74), popliteal aneurysm (45), SFA aneurysm (2), abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) (10) and failing bypass (55). Prior procedures had been performed in 262. DA was performed by six technologists (4 of whom are MDs). In all, 207 DA were performed intraoperatively and the remainder, preoperatively. The resultant procedures based upon DA included: bypass to the popliteal artery (262) and bypass to an infrapopliteal artery (325), endovascular procedures (363), thrombectomy (11), embolectomy (9), inflow bypass procedures to the femoral arteries (46), débridment (4), amputation (8) and no intervention (75). The areas not visualized well included: iliac (73), femoral (26), popliteal (17), and infrapopliteal (221). Additional imaging after DA was deemed necessary in 102 cases to obtain enough information to plan lower extremity revascularization. Factors associated with increased need to obtain CA included: DM (p<.001), infrapopliteal calcification (p<.001), older age (p = .01) and limb threatening ischemia (p<.001). Factors not associated with the need to obtain CA included: which technologist performed the exam, whether the technologist has a medical degree and whether the patient underwent prior revascularization. In 90% of patients reviewed, DA is able to obtain the needed information to plan lower extremity revascularization. Severe tibial vessel calcification is the most common cause of an incomplete DA exam and determines when alternative imaging modalities need to be obtained.

Effect of Duplex Arteriography in the Management of Acute Limb-Threatening Ischemia From Thrombosed Popliteal Aneurysms.

The role of routine use of duplex arteriography to diagnose thrombosis of popliteal artery aneurysm as a cause of acute lower extremity ischemia is investigated. In all, 109 patients (group 1) from 1994 to 1997 and 201 patients from 1998 to 2001(group 2) presenting with acute limb-threatening ischemia were studied. None of the group 1 patients underwent preoperative duplex arteriography, and no diagnosis of acute popliteal artery aneurysm thrombosis was made. Ten patients with acute ischemia due to thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysm were identified in group 2 when preoperative duplex arteriography was routinely performed. Urgent revascularization was performed based on the results of duplex arteriography. Six patients had functioning bypasses with a mean follow-up of 15.6 months. There were 3 deaths, 2 within 30 days and 1 after 2(1/2) years with functioning grafts. One patient was lost to follow-up. Routine use of duplex arteriography may provide the diagnosis and may identify the available outflow vessels for popliteal artery aneurysm.

Recanalização espontânea tardia de carótida interna: relato de caso

A recanalização espontânea tardia da carótida interna é um evento incomum e pouco estudado. Os autores relatam o caso de paciente de 73 anos, masculino, hipertenso, com antecedente de acidente vascular cerebral há 3 anos, com seqüela motora e sensitiva em membro superior direito, apresentando ao mapeamento dúplex e arteriografia oclusão total da carótida interna. Evoluiu após 2 anos com novos episódios de ataques isquêmicos transitórios de repetição. Submetido a novos exames de imagem para avaliação da circulação cerebral extra e intracraniana, evidenciou-se recanalização do vaso, com estenose severa. Foi realizada endarterectomia de carótida esquerda, sem intercorrências. Paciente evoluiu sem novos episódios após 1 mês de seguimento. Considerando a raridade do caso e a parca literatura sobre recanalização tardia de carótida, passível de reparo cirúrgico, optamos pela apresentação do caso enfocando a importância do acompanhamento de oclusões carotídeas.

Duplex Arteriography for Lower Extremity Revascularization

Duplex arteriography may be a potential replacement of preoperative standard contrast arteriography for peripheral arterial imaging in lower extremity revascularization procedures. In patients with chronic or acute ischemia, a well-performed duplex arteriography offers several practical advantages over contrast arteriography: it is noninvasive; it does not require nephrotoxic agents; it is portable and can be done expeditiously; color flow and waveform analysis provide a better estimation of the hemodynamic significance of occlusive disease; it allows direct visualization of the entire artery and not only of the lumen thus enabling plaque characterization; with color flow and power Doppler techniques, it is possible to identify patent arteries subjected to very low flow states; and it can detect occluded arterial aneurysms thereby avoiding unnecessary attempts at thromboembolectomies. High-quality arterial ultrasonography performed by a highly skilled and well-trained vascular technologist may represent an alternative to conventional arteriography for patients in need of primary or secondary lower extremity revascularization.

Preprocedural Imaging: New Options to Reduce Need for Contrast Angiography

In vascular surgery, the gold standard for evaluation of the lower-extremity arterial tree has long been contrast arteriography (CA). Associated risks of CA are well-documented and include severe allergic reactions, arterial injury and/or hemorrhage, and contrast-induced nephropathy. Increasingly, less-invasive techniques, with fewer inherent risks for complication, are being explored as diagnostic alternatives. Magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography angiography, and duplex arteriography, each offer distinct advantages, though are not without limitation. This review explores the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of these newer technologies and provides a comparison to CA as a means for defining the anatomic features of patients undergoing lower-extremity revascularization. This data suggests that noninvasive imaging technologies may, in the future, play an increasingly important role in the surgical evaluation of the patient with lower-extremity ischemia.

Commentary on "Duplex Arteriography for Lower Extremity Revascularization"

Commentary on "Duplex Arteriography for Lower Extremity Revascularization"

Guidelines for the treatment of arterial insufficiency ulcers

1. Co-chaired panel 2. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 3. University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 4. Sinai Hospital/Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 5. GKT School of Medicine, King’s College, London, UK 6. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX 7. Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City, CA 8. Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 9. Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 10. Southampton University Hospitals Trust NHS, Southampton, UK 11. Penrose–St. Francis Health Services, Colorado Springs, CO 12. Beverly Surgical Associates, Beverly, MA 13. Saint Francis Memorial Hospital, San Francisco, CA 14. Northbay Center for Wound Care, Vacaville, CA, and 15. University of California, San Francisco, CA

Impact of Duplex Arteriography in the Evaluation of Acute Lower Limb Ischemia from Thrombosed Popliteal Aneurysms

Acute limb-threatening ischemia from thrombosis may be the initial presentation of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) and is associated with amputation rates of 20-30%. Since contrast angiography may miss the diagnosis, the authors suspect that thrombosis of PAA may be an underappreciated cause of acute ischemia. Routine use of duplex arteriography (DA) may aid in the diagnosis and may help identify the outflow vessels with improved results. One hundred and nine patients (group 1) from 1994 to 1997 and 201 patients from 1998 to 2001 (group 2) presenting with acute limb-threatening ischemia were studied. None of the group 1 patients underwent preoperative DA and no diagnosis of acute popliteal artery aneurysm thrombosis was made. Ten patients with acute ischemia due to thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysms were identified in group 2 when preoperative DA was routinely performed. Urgent revascularization based on the results from DA was performed with use of autogenous saphenous vein in all patients. Six patients had functioning bypasses with a mean follow-up of 15.6 months. There were 3 deaths, 2 within 30 days and 1 after 2(1/2) years with functioning grafts. One patient was lost to follow-up. No major amputations were performed. Incidence of thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysms as the cause of acute limb-threatening ischemia is probably underestimated. Routine use of DA may provide the diagnosis and identifies the available outflow vessels. Contrary to previously published reports, urgent revascularization of an acutely ischemic extremity from thrombosed popliteal aneurysm can provide excellent rates of limb salvage.

Duplex Arteriography Prior to Femoral-Popliteal Reconstruction in Claudicants: A Proposal for a New Shortened Protocol

Duplex Arteriography Prior to Femoral-Popliteal Reconstruction in Claudicants: A Proposal for a New Shortened Protocol

Das Kompressionssyndrom des Truncus coeliacus: Röntgenologisch-angiographisches Phänomen oder Ursache ischämischer abdomineller Beschwerden?

Compression of the celiac trunk commonly occurs in young men and women as well. Most of the patients suffering from this rare disease derive from a large pool of people having diffuse and chronic abdominal complaints including epigastric pain, postprandial abdominal pain and diarrhea leading to weight loss. Aim of the study was the finding of true criteria which can guarantee a successful operative procedure. A major issue in preoperative assessment is color flow Duplex imaging of the celiac axis. The most important finding aside from clinical symptoms is a peak flow in the celiac axis of more than 200 cm/s during inspiration and expiration position of the diaphragm. In addition arteriography of the celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) showing a steal phenomenon is essential. Because of the rareness of the disease "only" 15 patients were operated on including intraoperative balloon dilatation of the celiac trunk. 93 % had a long term follow up success. Normal values of peak flow velocity in the mesenteric arteries were determined in more than one hundred healthy persons and compared to findings in the literature which were nearly identical. As a result of the study it could be shown that a successful outcome of the operative procedure can be expected when certain essential criteria are observed: 1. peak flow velocity in the celiac trunk higher than 200 cm/s during in- and expiration 2. steal effect via pancreatic arcades from the superior mesenteric artery documented by Duplex ultrasound and arteriography 3. triad of symptoms: epigastric pain, postprandial pain and weight loss of more than 5 kg. Special emphasis is given to the possible occurrence of severe complications after liver transplantations and pancreatic surgery, if the diagnosis "median arcuate ligament compression" is not known.

Duplex Arteriography Prior to Femoral-Popliteal Reconstruction in Claudicants: A Proposal for a New Shortened Protocol

The standard preoperative duplex arteriography (DA) from the aorta to the pedal vessels is time consuming and may be unnecessary in patients presenting with calf claudication alone. The feasibility of a shortened protocol was evaluated. Of 286 femoral-popliteal reconstruction based on DA during the last 4A years, 79 (28%) were primary operations for calf claudication. Eliminating the aortoiliac portion of the test except for the distal external iliac artery and limiting the scanning of the infrapopliteal vessels to one or two arteries in the leg would significantly shorten the exam. To confirm the adequacy of the inflow tract, we relied on the common femoral artery Doppler waveform analysis and the intraoperative graft pressure upon completion of the bypass. Of the 79 primary femoral-popliteal bypasses, 53 (67%) had triphasic common femoral artery waveform and the remaining 26 had monophasic or biphasic waveforms. Three (6%) of the 53 femoral-popliteal bypasses in the former group had significant pressure gradients measured intraoperatively and were treated with iliac angioplasties and stents for unsuspected stenoses in 2 cases and a covered stent for a common iliac aneurysm in 1 case. Three, two, and one infrapopliteal vessel runoff was observed in 24 (45%), 16 (30%), and 9 (17%) extremities, respectively. Four patients (8%) had significant stenoses (>50%) or occlusion of all three infrapopliteal arteries. Eighty-one percent of the patients would have completed the short protocol had we scanned the peroneal artery initially. An additional 8% would have required scanning of a second vessel (anterior tibial) and only 11%, scanning of all three infrapopliteal vessels. The time interval for completion of short-protocol DA was significantly less than the time for the standard DA (16.2 A+/- 5.2A min vs. 35.1 A+/- 10.6 min) ( p < 0.01). We believe that the proposed short DA protocol combined with intraoperative graft pressure measurements can be used in 94% of the patients who have a patent popliteal artery (>/= 7 cm). It is a totally noninvasive approach that is particularly suitable for vascular technologists and surgeons who wish to start utilizing DA instead of contrast arteriography prior to infrainguinal reconstructions. However, the short protocol does not avert the need for completion arteriography of the inflow arteries and readiness to perform endovascular procedures to correct lesions not suspected by common femoral artery waveform analysis.

Role of Duplex Arteriography as the Sole Preoperative Imaging Modality Prior to Lower Extremity Revascularization Surgery in Diabetic and Renal Patients

The limitations and complications associated with contrast angiography (CA) prior to lower extremity revascularization have led to an increased interest in duplex arteriography (DA) as a potential replacement. We report our experience with DA in patients with diabetes and/or chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) that would particularly benefit from a noninvasive approach to preoperative evaluation of the arterial tree. From January 1998 to November 2000, DA was performed in 145 patients with diabetes mellitus and/or CRI prior to 180 arterial reconstructions. One hundred twenty-one procedures were performed on 91 patients with diabetes alone, 41 on 33 patients with diabetes and CRI, and 18 on 15 patients with CRI alone. Patient ages ranged from 36 to 98 years (mean 72 +/- 12 years). Indications for surgery were severe claudication in 33 (18%), rest pain in 37 (21%), nonhealing ischemic ulcers in 52 (29%), and limb gangrene in 58 (32%). Optimal inflow and outflow anastomotic sites were selected according to a diagram based on DA that included arterial tree imaging from mid-aorta to the pedal vessels. Preoperative contrast arteriography was performed in 16 cases (9%) because of extremely poor runoff based on DA and limited visualization of outflow vessels. The distal anastomosis was to the popliteal artery in 89 cases (49%) and to the tibial and pedal arteries in 91 (51%). Intraoperative findings confirmed the preoperative DA results with the exception of one (0.6%) where the distal anastomosis was placed proximal to a significant stenosis requiring an extension graft. The use of DA presents a safe and reliable option to prebypass CA for many patients with diabetes or CRI. The ease of use and favorable patient outcomes achieved by this imaging modality may rival the use of CA for these patients.

A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Contrast Arteriography, and Duplex Arteriography for Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization

The objective of this study was to compare magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), contrast arteriography (CA), and duplex arteriography (DA) for defining anatomic features relevant to performing lower extremity revascularizations. From March 1, 2001 to August 1, 2001, 33 consecutive inpatients with chronic lower extremity ischemia underwent CA, MRA, and DA before undergoing lower extremity revascularization procedures. The reports of these tests were compared prospectively and the differences in the aortoiliac segment, femoral-popliteal, and infrapopliteal segments were noted. The vessels were classified as mild disease (<50%), moderate disease (50-70%), severe disease (71-99%), and occluded. These studies and treatment plans based on these data were compared. During this time period, 11 patients were not able to undergo MRA and therefore were excluded from the study. Thirty-three patients were included in this study. These patients underwent 35 procedures, as 2 patients underwent bilateral procedures. The mean age of the 33 patients was 76+/-10 years (SD). Indications for the procedures included gangrene (20), ischemic ulcer (8), rest pain (4), and severe claudication (1). Patients' medical history included diabetes mellitus (25), hypertension (20), and end-stage renal disease (5). No differences were noted between intraoperative findings and CA in this series. Two of the three differences between DA and CA were felt to be clinically significant whereas 9 of the 12 differences between MRA and CA were felt to be clinically significant. On the basis of these data in this series, MRA does not yet seem to be able to obtain adequate data on infrapopliteal segments, at least not for this highly selected population. When severe tibial calcification or very low flow states are identified, CA may be necessary for patients undergoing DA.

Magnetic resonance angiography versus duplex arteriography in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization: which is the best replacement for contrast arteriography?

Objective In an effort to explore alternatives to contrast material–enhanced arteriography, we compared magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and duplex arteriography (DA) with contrast arteriography (CA) for defining anatomic features in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. Methods From August 1, 2001, to August 1, 2002, 61 consecutive inpatients (64 limbs) with chronic lower extremity ischemia underwent CA, MRA, and DA before undergoing lower extremity revascularization procedures. The reports of these tests and images were compared prospectively, and the differences in the iliac, femoropopliteal, and infrapopliteal segments were noted. The vessels were classified as mildly diseased (<50%), moderately diseased (50%-70%), severely diseased (71%-99%), or occluded. The studies and treatment plans based on these data were compared. Results Mean patient age was 76 ± 10 years (SD). Indications for the procedures included gangrene (43%), ischemic ulcer (28%), rest pain (19%), severe claudication (9%), and failing bypass (1%). During this period 35 patients were ineligible for the protocol, because they could not undergo MRA (n = 27) or angiography (n = 8). Of the total 192 segments in the 64 patients (iliac, femoropopliteal, tibial), 17% were not able to be fully assessed with DA, and 7% with MRA. Disagreements with CA and DA were found in the iliac, femoropopliteal, and tibial segments in 0%, 7%, and 14% of cases, respectively, and between CA and MRA in 10%, 26%, and 42% of cases, respectively. Two of 9 differences (22%) between DA and CA were thought to be clinically significant, and 28 of 45 differences (62%) between MRA and CA were thought to be clinically significant. Conclusions A review of the data obtained in this series indicates that MRA does not yet seem to yield adequate data, at least in this highly selected population at our institution. When severe calcification is identified, CA may be necessary in patients undergoing DA.

Early results of infragenicular revascularization based solely on duplex arteriography

Purpose: Recent reports have both advocated and questioned the utility of duplex arteriography (DA) as the sole preoperative imaging modality for planning infragenicular revascularization. This study compares the outcome of patients with critical limb ischemia who underwent infragenicular vein grafts on the basis of DA alone versus conventional preoperative contrast arteriography (CA). Methods: The study group is composed of 23 consecutive patients who underwent infragenicular vein bypass grafting solely on the basis of preoperative DA from 1998 to 1999. They were compared with 50 consecutive patients who underwent infragenicular vein bypass grafting after CA from 1996 to 1998. Peak systolic velocity and end-diastolic velocity of potential target arteries were recorded during DA studies. In situ saphenous vein grafts were used preferentially, and technical adequacy of all grafts was assessed with completion duplex or arteriography. Results: DA and CA groups were comparable on the basis of age and risk factors. In one limb (4%), the target artery selected by DA was abandoned because of dense calcification. No other revision in target or inflow artery was required on the basis of intraoperative completion studies. At 1 year, primary graft patency (78% vs 70%, P = .72) and limb salvage (70% vs 81%, P = .21) were comparable between the two groups. In the DA group, mean preoperative target artery peak systolic velocity in patent versus failed grafts was 49 ± 18 cm/s versus 31 ± 9 cm/s ( P = .04), whereas mean end-diastolic velocity was 22 ± 7 cm/s versus 14 ± 8 cm/s ( P = .08). Conclusion: Infragenicular revascularization directed by DA alone provides early graft patency and limb salvage rates comparable to similar procedures that are based on CA. Preoperative DA target artery velocities may predict outcome and improve target selection. These initial results justify further clinical testing of DA as the primary imaging modality for planning infragenicular vein grafts. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:1165-70.)

Duplex scanning for grading aortoiliac obstructive disease and guiding treatment

Standard assessment of aortoiliac obstructive disease (AIOD) includes arteriography preferably supplemented with femoral artery pressure (FAP) measurements. This study investigated the value of Duplex scanning in classifying AIOD and compared the outcome of Duplex scanning with clinical decision making. One-hundred-and-fifty-three aortoiliac segments of 87 patients were prospectively examined by Duplex scanning, arteriography, and FAP measurements to establish the presence or absence of significant AIOD. The results of these tests were compared to each other and to the subsequent vascular interventions and their success rates. Excellent agreement (kappa 0.82) was found between Duplex scanning and arteriography. The agreement between Duplex scanning and FAP measurements was much lower (kappa 0.52). The correlation between the performed treatment and the assessment of AIOD by Duplex scanning or arteriography was good, whereas the FAP results correlated only moderately with the performed treatment. Endovascular or operative treatment was actually performed in only 63% of the aortoiliac segments with an abnormal FAP test (success rate 80%). Aortoiliac segments with significant AIOD according to arteriography or Duplex scanning were treated invasively in 86% (success rate 81%) and 82% (success rate 80%), respectively. In conclusion, Duplex scanning can replace arteriography as a screening tool for the identification of treatable aortoiliac lesions whereas the value of FAP measurements in the decision making process is limited.

Duplex scanning alone before carotid endarterectomy: A 5-year experience

The role of duplex scanning and arteriography as a means of assessing patients for carotid endarterectomy has been reviewed for the period 1984 to 1988 when 98 carotid endarterectomies were performed. Of these 44 were selected for surgery on the basis of duplex assessment alone, 48 after carotid angiography and duplex scanning and six after angiography alone. No difference between the groups of patients was observed for either perioperative or follow-up complication rates, although all late deaths occurred in patients who had been examined by angiography. By the end of the study period angiography was requested for less than 30% of all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. It is argued that the change in our practice is safe provided that certain criteria are met. These include angiography in cases of suspected aortic arch or proximal vessel disease and in those symptomatic patients with a duplex diagnosis of complete occlusion.

Durability of vein graft revision: The outcome of secondary procedures

Occlusive lesions that reduced graft blood flow and ankle systolic pressure were identified in 83 femorodistal saphenous vein bypasses by use of duplex scanning or arteriography. Sites of stenosis included vein conduit (n = 41), anastomoses (n = 20), outflow arteries (n = 15), or inflow (n = 9) arteries. One hundred three secondary procedures consisting of vein-patch angioplasty (n = 31), sequential (n = 21) or interposition (n = 17) graft placement, percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (n = 17), or excision of the lesion and primary anastomosis (n = 16) were performed to correct primary (n = 85) or recurrent (n = 18) graft stenoses. Cumulative graft patency after reintervention was 96% at 1 year, and 85% at 5 years. Stenosis or occlusion of revision sites was less after excision (0 of 16) or replacement (1 of 17) of abnormal segments compared to vein-patch angioplasty (8 of 31) or balloon angioplasty (9 of 18). Sequential or jump grafts constructed to improve graft outflow impaired by either myointimal or atherosclerotic occlusive lesions were the least durable secondary procedures. Five of eight graft failures in this series resulted from sequential/jump graft occlusion. All categories of secondary procedures normalized graft and limb hemodynamics, although only one third of patients reported symptoms of limb ischemia before revision. Surveillance of infrainguinal vein bypasses for occlusive lesions is a valid concept to salvage patent but hemodynamically-failing grafts. Secondary procedures that excised the lesion, used autologous tissue reconstruction, and normalized hemodynamics at the revision site and in the vein bypass were associated with a low incidence of restenosis and prolonged graft patency.