Duodenum-preserving Pancreatic Head Resection Research Articles

Reflection on analyzing the long-term quality of life between duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pancreatoduodenectomy.

Reflection on analyzing the long-term quality of life between duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pancreatoduodenectomy.

Impact of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pancreatoduodenectomy on postoperative diarrhea: insights from trial sequential analysis.

Impact of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pancreatoduodenectomy on postoperative diarrhea: insights from trial sequential analysis.

Letter to the Editor ["Long-term quality of life between duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis"

Letter to the Editor ["Long-term quality of life between duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis"

Long-Term Oncologic Outcome following Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors, Cystic Neoplasms, and Neuroendocrine Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has a considerable surgical risk for complications and late metabolic morbidity. Parenchyma-sparing resection of benign tumors has the potential to cure patients associated with reduced procedure-related short- and long-term complications. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries were searched for studies reporting surgery-related complications following PD and duodenum-preserving total (DPPHRt) or partial (DPPHRp) pancreatic head resection for benign tumors. A total of 38 cohort studies that included data from 1262 patients were analyzed. In total, 729 patients underwent DPPHR and 533 PD. Concordance between preoperative diagnosis of benign tumors and final histopathology was 90.57% for DPPHR. Cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNETs) and periampullary tumors (PATs) were observed in 497, 89, and 31 patients, respectively. In total, 34 of 161 (21.1%) patients with intraepithelial papillar mucinous neoplasm exhibited severe dysplasia in the final histopathology. The meta-analysis, when comparing DPPHRt and PD, revealed in-hospital mortality of 1/362 (0.26%) and 8/547 (1.46%) patients, respectively [OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.15-1.58); p = 0.21], and frequency of reoperation of 3.26 % and 6.75%, respectively [OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.96); p = 0.04]. After a follow-up of 45.8 ± 26.6 months, 14/340 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms/mucinous cystic neoplasms (IPMN/MCN, 4.11%) and 2/89 patients with PNET (2.24%) exhibited tumor recurrence. Local recurrence at the resection margin and reoccurrence of tumor growth in the remnant pancreas was comparable after DPPHR or PD [OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.178-5.34); p = 0.96]. DPPHR for benign, premalignant neoplasms provides a cure for patients with low risk of tumor recurrence and significantly fewer early surgery-related complications compared with PD. DPPHR has the potential to replace PD for benign, premalignant cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Premalignant cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreatic head-Is the Kausch-Whipple resection an adequate treatment?

Currently, the most frequently used surgical treatment for symptomatic, benign, premalignant cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreatic head is the Whipple procedure or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). However, when performed for treatment of benign tumors, PD is amultiorgan resection involving loss of pancreatic and extrapancreatic tissue and functions. PD for benign neoplasm is associated with the risk of considerable early postoperative complications and an in-hospital mortality of up to 5%. Following the Whipple procedure anew onset of diabetes mellitus is observed in 14-20% and new exocrine insufficiency in 25-45%, leading to metabolic dysfunction and impairment of quality of life persisting after resection of benign tumors. Symptomatic neoplasms are indication for surgery. Patients with asymptomatic pancreatic tumors are treated according to the criteria of surveillance protocols. The goal of surgical treatment for asymptomatic patients is, according to the guideline criteria, interruption of the surveillance program before the development of an advanced stage cancer associated with the neoplasm. Tumor enucleation and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, either total or partial, are parenchyma-sparing resections for benign neoplasms of the pancreatic head. The first choice for small tumors is enucleation; however, enucleation is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic fistula B + C following pancreatic main duct injury. Duodenum-preserving total or partial pancreatic head resection has the advantage of low postoperative surgery-related complications, amortality of < 0.5% and maintenance of the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions. Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic head resections should replace classical Whipple procedures for neoplasms of the pancreatic head.

Quality of life after pancreatic surgery.

Pancreatic surgery is challenging owing to the anatomical characteristics of the pancreas. Increasing attention has been paid to changes in quality of life (QOL) after pancreatic surgery. To summarize and analyze current research results on QOL after pancreatic surgery. A systematic search of the literature available on PubMed and EMBASE was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies were identified by screening the references of retrieved articles. Studies on patients' QOL after pancreatic surgery published after January 1, 2012, were included. These included prospective and retrospective studies on patients' QOL after several types of pancreatic surgeries. The results of these primary studies were summarized inductively. A total of 45 articles were included in the study, of which 13 were related to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), seven to duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR), nine to distal pancreatectomy (DP), two to central pancreatectomy (CP), and 14 to total pancreatectomy (TP). Some studies showed that 3-6 months were needed for QOL recovery after PD, whereas others showed that 6-12 months was more accurate. Although TP and PD had similar influences on QOL, patients needed longer to recover to preoperative or baseline levels after TP. The QOL was better after DPPHR than PD. However, the superiority of the QOL between patients who underwent CP and PD remains controversial. The decrease in exocrine and endocrine functions postoperatively was the main factor affecting the QOL. Minimally invasive surgery could improve patients' QOL in the early stages after PD and DP; however, the long-term effect remains unclear. The procedure among PD, DP, CP, and TP with a superior postoperative QOL is controversial. The long-term benefits of minimally invasive versus open surgeries remain unclear. Further prospective trials are warranted.

Long-term quality of life between duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The authors aimed to compare the differences in quality of life (QOL) and overall survival (OS) between duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) during long-term follow-up. DPPHR and PD have been shown to be effective in alleviating symptoms and controlling malignancies, but there is ongoing debate over whether DPPHR has an advantage over PD in terms of long-term benefits. The authors searched the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies comparing DPPHR and PD published before 1 May 2023. This study was registered with PROSPERO. Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies were included. The Mantel-Haenszel model and inverse variance method were used as statistical approaches for data synthesis. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity of the results. The primary outcome was the global QOL score, measured using the QLQ-C30 system. The authors analysed ten studies involving 976 patients (456 DPPHR and 520 PD). The global QOL score did not differ significantly between the DPPHR and PD groups [standard mean difference (SMD) 0.21, 95% CI (-0.05, 0.46), P =0.109, I2 =70%]; however, the OS time of patients with DPPHR was significantly improved [hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI (0.44, 0.77), P <0.001, I2 =0%]. The follow-up length may be an important source of heterogeneity. Studies with follow-up length between two to seven years showed better global QOL for DPPHR than for PD [SMD 0.43, 95% CI (0.23, 0.64), P <0.001, I2 =0%]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the functional scales of the QLQ-C30 system (all P >0.05). On the symptom scale, patients in the DPPHR group had lower scores for fatigue, nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite, insomnia, and diarrhoea than those in the PD group (all P <0.05). There were no significant differences in global QOL scores between the two surgeries; however, DPPHR had advantages over PD in terms of safer perioperative outcomes, lower long-term symptom scores, and longer OS times. Therefore, DPPHR should be recommended over PD for the treatment of benign pancreatic diseases and low-grade malignant tumours.

ASO Author Reflections: Feasibility of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Technique in Robotic Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection.

ASO Author Reflections: Feasibility of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Technique in Robotic Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection.

Nationwide Outcome of Tailored Surgery for Symptomatic Chronic Pancreatitis based on Pancreatic Morphology

Objective: To determine the nationwide use and outcome of tailored surgical treatment for symptomatic chronic pancreatitis (CP) as advised by recent guidelines. Summary background data: Randomized trials have shown that surgery is superior to endoscopy in patients with symptomatic CP, although endoscopy remains popular Recent guidelines advice to “tailor surgery” based on pancreatic morphology meaning that the least extensive procedure should be selected based on pancreatic morphology. However, nationwide, and multicenter studies On tailored surgery for symptomatic CP are lacking. Methods: Nationwide multicenter retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for symptomatic CP in all seven Dutch university medical centers (2010-2020). Outcomes included volume trend, major complications, 90-day mortality, postoperative opioid use and clinically relevant pain relief. Surgical treatment was tailored based on the size of the main pancreatic duct and pancreatic head (e.g. surgical drainage for a dilated pancreatic duct, and normal size pancreatic head). Results: Overall, 381 patients underwent surgery for CP: 127 surgical drainage procedures ( 33%; mostly extended lateral pancreaticojejunostomy), 129 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections (DPPHR, 34%, mostly Frey), and 125 formal pancreatic resections (33%, mostly distal pancreatectomy). The annual surgical volume increased slightly (Pearson r=0.744). Mortality (90-day) occurred in 6 patients (2%), and was non-significantly lower after surgical drainage (0%, 3%, 2%; P=0.139). Major complications (12%, 24%, 26%; P=0.012), postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (0%, 3%, 22%; P=0.038), surgical reintervention (4%, 16%, 12%; P=0.006), and endocrine insufficiency ( 14%, 21%, 43%; P&lt;0.001) occurred less often after surgical drainage. After a median follow-up of 11 months [IQR 3-23] good rates of clinically relevant pain relief ( 83%, 69%, 80%; P=0.082) were observed and 81% of opioid users had stopped using (83%, 78%, 84%, P=0.496). Conclusion: The use of surgery for symptomatic CP increased over the study period. Drainage procedures were associated with the best safety profile and excellent functional outcome, highlighting the importance of tailoring surgery based on pancreatic morphology.

Real-time fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green during laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection

BackgroundLaparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) is a surgical method used to treat benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic head tumors. This study aimed to determine the protective effect of common bile duct in LDPPHR using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging. MethodsA retrospective analysis of 30 patients treated with LDPPHR at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2015 and November 2022 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on ICG use: ICG and non-ICG. ResultsThirty patients received LDPPHR, 11 males and 19 females, and the age was 50.50 (M (IQR)) years (range: 19–76 years). LDPPHR was successfully performed in 27 (90 %) patients, LPD was performed in 1 (3 %) patient, and laparotomy conversion was performed in 2 (7 %) patients. One patient (3 %) died 21 days after surgery. The incidence of intraoperative bile duct injury in the ICG group was lower than that in the non-ICG group (10 % vs 60 %, P = 0.009), and the operation time in the ICG group was shorter than that in the non-ICG group (311.9 ± 14.97 vs 338.05 ± 18.75 min, P < 0.05). Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 16 patients (53 %), including 10 with biochemical leakage (62.5 %), four with grade B (25 %), and two with grade C (12.5 %). Postoperative bile leakage occurred in four patients (13 %). ConclusionsThe ICG fluorescence imaging technology in LDPPHR helps protect the integrity of the common bile duct and reduce the occurrence of intraoperative bile duct injury, postoperative bile leakage, and bile duct stenosis.

Pancreatic Surgery in Children: Complex, Safe and Effective.

The aim of this study is to assess indications for and report outcomes of pancreatic surgery in pediatric patients. Indications for pancreatic surgery in children are rare and data on surgical outcomes after pediatric pancreatic surgery are scarce. All children who underwent pancreatic surgery at a tertiary hospital specializing in pancreatic surgery between 2003 and 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Indications, surgical procedures, and perioperative as well as long-term outcomes were analyzed. In total, 73 children with a mean age of 12.8 years (range: 4 months-18 years) underwent pancreatic surgery during the observation period. Indications included chronic pancreatitis (n=35), pancreatic tumors (n=27), and pancreatic trauma (n=11). Distal pancreatectomy was the most frequently performed procedure (n=23), followed by pancreatoduodenectomy (n=19), duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (n=10), segmental pancreatic resection (n=7), total pancreatectomy (n=3), and others (n=11). Postoperative morbidity occurred in 25 patients (34.2%), including 7 cases (9.6%) with major complications (Clavien-Dindo≥III). There was no postoperative (90-day) mortality. The 5-year overall survival was 90.5%. The 5-year event-free survival of patients with chronic pancreatitis was 85.7%, and 69.0% for patients with pancreatic tumors. This is the largest single-center study on pediatric pancreatic surgery in a Western population. Pediatric pancreatic surgery can be performed safely. Centralization in pancreatic centers with high expertise in surgery of adult and pediatric patients is important as it both affords the benefits of pancreatic surgery experience and ensures that surgical management is adapted to the specific needs of children.

Recent trends in organ-preserving pancreatectomy: Itsproblems and clinical advantages compared with other standard pancreatectomies.

In this review article, we focus on recent papers on organ-preserving pancreatectomy procedures published since 2010. When comparing central pancreatectomy (CP) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), most studies have concluded that the CP group exhibited significantly lower incidence of new-onset diabetes or diabetes exacerbation than the DP group postoperatively. However, because of increased incidence of morbidities such as pancreatic fistula, the surgeon faces a considerable trade-off between increased short-term morbidity and long-term preservation of endocrine function. When the outcomes of two types of spleen-preserving DP (Kimura and Warshaw procedures) are compared, most studies mentioned the low incidence of postoperative gastric varices and splenic infarction with the Kimura procedure. Although there are several reports regarding the effect of spleen preservation on prevention of postoperative infections, no report on the contribution of spleen preservation to the prevention of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection is seen. The advantages of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) concerning endocrine and exocrine functions continue to be subjects of discussion, mainly due to the limited number of institutions that have adopted this approach; however, DPPHR should be presented as an option for patients due to its low incidence of postoperative cholangitis. Organ-preserving pancreatectomy requires meticulous surgical techniques, and postoperative complications may increase with this surgery compared with standard pancreatectomy, which may be influenced by the surgeon's skill and the surgical facility where the procedure is performed. Nonetheless, this technique has significant long-term advantages in terms of endocrine and exocrine functions and its wider adoption in the future is expected.

Patient reported outcomes of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis: high effectivity is impaired by prolonged non-surgical management

BackgroundChronic pancreatitis (CP) causes suffering and socioeconomic burden. This study evaluated perioperative results and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in CP patients treated with duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). MethodsData were analyzed of CP patients undergoing DPPHR between 01/2001-10/2014. PROs were measured using a specifically designed questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30/PAN26. Associations between treatment variables and PROs were examined. ResultsOf 332 patients who received DPPHR, most (n = 251, 75.6%) underwent the Berne modification. Surgical morbidity was 21.5% (n = 71) and 90-day mortality 1.5% (n = 5). Median follow-up was 79.9 months, 5-year survival 90.5%, and 1.8% of patients developed pancreatic cancer. Of 283 patients alive, 178 (62.9%) returned questionnaires. Referral for surgery was self-initiated (38.0% of cases), by gastroenterologists (27.5%) and by general practitioners (21.1%). QoL improved in 78.7% of patients, remained stable in 12.1%, and worsened in 9.1%. Median Izbicki scores decreased from 90 to 5 points after surgery (p < 0.0001). Time from diagnosis to DPPHR was an independent, proportional predictor of a higher postoperative Izbicki score (p = 0.04). ConclusionDPPHR is an effective, safe treatment for CP. A delay in surgery decreases surgical effectivity, hence CP patients should be referred to surgery early to ensure satisfactory outcomes.

Study on the application value of fluorescent laparoscopy in pancreatic tumor surgery.

Fluorescent laparoscopy is rarely used in pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of fluorescent laparoscopy in pancreatic tumor surgery. A total of 19 patients with pancreatic tumors who were treated in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College from January 2021 to August 2022 were selected. Fluorescent laparoscopy was used intraoperatively, and the imaging characteristics of different tumors were recorded and analyzed. Among the 19 participants, postoperative pathology confirmed 12 cases of pancreatic cancer (8 cases of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 3 cases of moderately-poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and 1 case of acinar cell carcinoma), 4 cases of pancreatic cystic tumors (1 case of microcystic serous cystadenoma, 1 case of serous cystadenoma, 1 case of solid pseudopapillary tumor, and 1 case of solid-cystic pseudopapillary tumor), 1 case of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (G1 stage), and 2 cases of inflammatory lesions. There were 8 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy, 6 cases of distal pancreatectomy, 3 cases of middle pancreatectomy, 1 case of local pancreatectomy, and 1 case of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. One minute after intravenous injection of indocyanine green (ICG), 10 of the 12 patients with pancreatic cancer showed tumor peritumor imaging; 2 cases of pancreatic serous cystic tumors did not show imaging; 2 cases of solid pseudopapillary tumors had tumor body imaging; 1 case of neuroendocrine tumor had tumor body imaging, with complete fluorescence imaging after specimen dissection; there were 2 cases pathologically confirmed as inflammatory lesions, 1 case with tumor body imaging, and 1 case with capsule imaging. By reasonably controlling the administration time and dose of ICG during surgery, some pancreatic tumors can be fluorescently imaged, which is beneficial for intraoperative tumor localization and margin determination.

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection

BackgroundThe procedure of total duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHRt) has been reported frequently, but rare in minimally invasive procedure, especially robotic-assisted operation. Here we share our experience and analyze the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive DPPHRt in the treatment of benign lesions or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head in this study.Materials and methodsFrom October 2016 to January 2022, three patients received robot-assisted DPPHRt(RA-DPPHRt), and seventeen patients received laparoscopic DPPHRt(LDPPHRt). Data were retrospectively collected in terms of demographic characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, and pathological diagnosis), intraoperative variables (operative time, estimated blood loss), and post-operative variables (post-operative hospital stay, and complications).ResultsAll 20 patients received minimally invasive total duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection successfully without conversion, including 8 males and 12 females. Pathological diagnosis suggested 1 case of serous cystadenoma (SCA), 4 cases of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) ,5 cases of mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), 4 cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PNET), 2 cases of chronic pancreatitis (CP),4 case of solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT). The average operation time was (285.35 ± 95.13 min), ranging from 95 to 420 min. The average estimate blood loss was (196.50 ± 174.45ml) ,ranging from 10 to 600ml.The average post-operative hospital stay was(20.90 ± 14.44days),ranging from 8 to 54 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 10 patients (50%). A total of 5 patients (20%) suffered grade B or C pancreatic fistula. Two patients (10%) suffered from biliary fistula. Two patients (10%) suffered from delayed gastric emptying. One patient (5%) suffered from abdominal bleeding. The 90-day mortality was 0. No patient was observed tumor recurrence and new-onset diabetes but one developed diarrhea.ConclusionRA-DPPHRt or LDPPHRt provided a minimally invasive approach with good organ-preservation for patients with benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic head tumor. It is only recommended to be performed in high-volume pancreatic centers by experienced pancreatic surgeons.

Option of isolated pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis

The paper presents two clinical observations of successful duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection performed for chronic calcifying pancreatitis complicated by ductal hypertension. At the reconstructive stage, an isolated segment of jejunum, 20 cm from the ligament of Treitz, was used. It was placed behind the colon. The patients had pancreatojejunostomosis formed with the wound surface of the pancreatic head and duct, and duodenojejunostomosis with the lower horizontal part of the duodenum. The first patient had no complications in the postoperative period. After 6 months, the patient showed improvement in the external secretory function of the pancreas, with absence of pain syndrome. The second patient developed gastrointestinal bleeding on day 10 and underwent endoscopic hemostasis. In 1.5, the esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed patent anastomosis, without signs of inflammation. The applied variant of surgery enables pancreatic juice to be secreted as close to anatomical and physiological conditions as possible. Furthermore, the method allows endoscopic hemostasis to be performed in case of bleeding from the anastomosis zone. Further study is required on the long-term results of the proposed option of surgery.

Whipple Resection for Benign Tumors and Premalignant Neoplasms of the Pancreatic Head: Surgery-Associated Risk for Complications and Late Metabolic Morbidity Matters.

Benign and premalignant neoplasms of the pancreas are increasingly detected and recommended for surgical treatment. For tumors of the pancreatic head, the challenging decision is: multiorgan resection or local tumor extirpation? Compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection is associated with significantly fewer surgery-related serious and severe complications and lower in-hospital mortality. The decisive advantage of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection is the maintenance of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal tract functions.

How to implement minimally invasive duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection for patients with pancreatic head lesions: A retrospective study.

Laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) has been widely reported. However, due to the challenges involved in performing total pancreatic head resection during operation, there are few studies reporting it. Between November 2016 and October 2022, we performed laparoscopic duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection (LDPPHRt) on 64 patients in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Perioperative data of the patients such as age, gender, body mass index, operation time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were collected and analyzed. This study included 40 women and 24 men aged 41.4 ± 15.7 years. All patients completed the surgery, and none of the patients underwent laparotomy. The average operation time was 275 (255, 310) min. The average postoperative hospital stay was 12 (10, 16) days. The rate of occurrence of pancreatic fistula was 10.9% (7/64), and that of the biliary fistula was 9.4% (6/64). One of the patients underwent cholangiojejunostomy 3 months after the operation due to painless jaundice and bile duct dilatation. By dissecting the space between the pancreatic head and duodenum, the posterior pancreatic duodenal arterial arch and the surface vascular network of the common bile duct (CBD) can be preserved. This ensures the success of LDPPHRt and avoids postoperative complications in the absence of intraoperative image guidance.

Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection or pancreatoduodenectomy for the surgical treatment of paraduodenal pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study

Paraduodenal pancreatitis (PDP) is an uncommon yet well-described type of focal chronic pancreatitis. The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with PDP using pancreatoduodenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). A retrospective analysis of 153 consecutive patients with PDP was performed. Patients who were treated with either DPPHR or PD were enrolled. The primary endpoint of the study was pain control achieved at the time of follow-up. The secondary endpoints of the study were complication rate (Clavien-Dindo > 2), hospital length of stay, and 90-day mortality. All patients were followed up after discharge for the assessment of pain cessation for a minimal period of 10 months. The final study population consisted of 71 patients. A total of 14 patients (19.7%) underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, and 57 (80.3%) were managed with DPPHR. Complication rate was significantly lower in DPPHR group at χ2 = 4.2677, p < 0.05. Mean hospital length of stay was 9.3 days (range 3-29) in DPPHR group and 13.9 days (range 7-35) in PD group (p < 0.05). No postoperative mortality was recorded. The mean follow-up period of the patients after surgery was 41.8 ± 20.6 months (range 10-88). Pain scores at the time of operation were calculated as 50.9 ± 12.1 in DPPHR group and 56.1 ± 11.4 in PD group. At the time of follow-up, pain scores improved significantly in both groups and were 10.3 ± 8.8 and 10.9 ± 8.6, respectively. DPPHR achieves similar results in pain control as PD with a lower complication rate and shorter hospital LOS.

Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for the management of pancreatic-head cystic neoplasms

BackgroundIn this study, we aimed to investigate the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic-head resection (LDPPHR) for the management of pancreatic-head cystic neoplasms.MethodsThis retrospective study included 60 patients who were treated with pancreatic-head cystic neoplasms at the Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from December 2019 to July 2022.ResultsNo significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the baseline and pathological characteristics of patients (P > 0.05). The postoperative exhaust time was shorter in the LDPPHR group compared with the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) group (2 (2 and 4) vs. 4 (3 and 5) days; P = 0.003). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion, hemoglobin levels on the first postoperative day, total bilirubin before discharge, direct bilirubin before discharge, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, hemorrhage, peritoneal effusion, abdominal infection, delayed gastric emptying, interventional embolization hemostasis, reoperation, and 30-day readmission (P > 0.05). No conversion and 90-day mortality were found in the two groups. The LDPPHR group showed a higher 3-month postoperative PNI, 6-month postoperative TG and 6-month postoperative BMI than the LPD group (P < 0.05).ConclusionsCompared with LPD, LDPPHR can decrease the postoperative exhaust time of patients, improve the short-term postoperative nutritional status, and does not decrease the safety of the perioperative period.