Duodenal Tumors Research Articles

White-Light Imaging and Image-Enhanced Endoscopy With Magnifying Endoscopy for the Optical Diagnosis of Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Optical diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors using white-light imaging (WLI) and/or narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy (NBI-ME) is used to guide the treatment strategy and avoid biopsy-induced fibrosis. However, the effectiveness of this approach has not been elucidated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to investigate the diagnostic yield between Vienna classification category 3 (VCL C3) and categories 4 or 5 (VCL C4/C5) using biopsy, WLI, NBI-ME, and WLI + NBI-ME. A literature search identified studies on the diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors using biopsy, WLI, or NBI-ME. A bivariate random-effects model was utilized to analyze the summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity, as well as the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves for diagnosing VCL C4/C5. Ultimately, 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. For the diagnosis of VCL C4/C5, summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were for biopsy 47% (95% confidence interval: 37-58), 86% (79-91), and 0.745; for WLI 80% (65-89), 80% (70-87), and 0.859; for NBI-ME were 72% (61-81), 76% (68-85), and 0.811; and for WLI + NBI-ME 88% (67-96), 87% (51-98), and 0.929, respectively. WLI, NBI-ME, and WLI + NBI-ME showed high values for sensitivity and area under the curve. Biopsies can be replaced by WLI, NBI-ME, and WLI + NBI-ME for the preoperative diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. However, further accumulation of research findings is needed.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between conventional and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors are relatively rare subepithelial tumors that arise from cells of the neuroendocrine system. Small duodenal neuroendocrine tumors can be treated endoscopically because of their low potential for metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of conventional and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors. Between March 2009 and March 2023, 15 patients with duodenal neuroendocrine tumors resected using conventional (n = 7) and underwater (n = 8) endoscopic mucosal resections were retrospectively enrolled. The median specimen size and median tumor size were 1.0 cm (interquartile range: 0.8–1.2 cm) and 0.6 cm (interquartile range: 0.4–0.6 cm), respectively. More than half of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors were located in the duodenal bulb (9/15, 60%). The en bloc and complete resection rates of both conventional and underwater endoscopic mucosal resections were 100%. Only one perforation event occurred in the conventional endoscopic mucosal resection group (14.3%). The patient with the perforation was treated with endoscopic clipping. The median follow-up period was 39.5 months (interquartile range: 19.5–57.3 months). There was no local recurrence or distant metastasis during the follow-up period. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and effective treatment option for small duodenal neuroendocrine tumors and is the preferred treatment option for flat-type duodenal neuroendocrine tumors.

An additional gastrojejunostomy may reduce the incidence of moderate and severe delayed gastric emptying after distal segmental duodenectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BackgroundTo investigate whether an additional gastrojejunostomy reduces the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) following a distal segmental duodenectomy for duodenal and proximal jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).Materials and methodsThis retrospective review of the GIST database at Peking University Cancer Hospital included 50 patients who underwent distal segmental duodenectomies for primary GIST in the duodenum or proximal jejunum within 20 cm of Treitz’s ligament between January 2008 and December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: non-bypass (without gastrojejunostomy) and bypass (with gastrojejunostomy and Braun’s jejunojejunostomy). Perioperative characteristics and postoperative complications were analyzed.ResultsAmong the 50 patients, 27 underwent duodenojejunostomies without gastrojejunostomies and 23 with gastrojejunostomies and Braun’s jejunojejunostomies. The incidence of grade B-C DGE was significantly lower in the bypass group (43.5% vs. 74.1%, p = 0.028). In addition, non-bypass surgery was an independent risk factor for increased grade B-C DGE (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.07–12.64, p = 0.039). The bypass group showed a trend towards a shorter postoperative hospital stay (median: 14 days, range: 10–56) compared to the non-bypass group (median: 28 days, range: 6–75), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.070). Operative time (min) was significantly longer in the multi-visceral resection group (381.0 ± 108.8 vs. 227.3 ± 87.6, p < 0.001), for tumors ≥ 6.3 cm compared to < 6.3 cm (337.0 ± 116.4 vs. 228.3 ± 99.8, p = 0.002), and in patients with positive preoperative symptoms versus asymptomatic patients (319.9 ± 118.0 vs. 210.2 ± 90.3, p = 0.031).ConclusionThe addition of gastrojejunostomy and Braun’s jejunojejunostomy in distal segmental duodenectomy can reduce the incidence of grade B-C DGE, potentially facilitating timely adjuvant imatinib therapy. Future multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Novel endoscopic approach for safe and effective resection of duodenal neuroendocrine tumor.

Novel endoscopic approach for safe and effective resection of duodenal neuroendocrine tumor.

Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection including papilla (with video).

Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is a low-invasive treatment for duodenal tumors including papilla. The limit of lesion size and local recurrence have been issues in EP. We developed endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the duodenal tumors including papilla (ESDIP: ESD including papilla) to overcome the problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ESDIP. We included the patients who underwent ESDIP from August 2010 to January 2024 in this study. We evaluated the retrospective characteristics of patients and lesions, clinical results of ESDIP and of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as prevention for delayed adverse events, and pathological findings. We also calculated the cumulative recurrence rate and overall survival rate at 12 months after ESDIP. Fifty-four patients were included in this study. The mean lesion size was 39 mm. The third-quarter cases revealed a less than half-circumferential lesion, and the one case with a full-circumferential lesion. Resection was accomplished in 96% (n = 52), and also the en-bloc resection rate was 96%. Of the cases in accomplished resection, 98% of patients were intubated with a pancreaticobiliary drainage tube by ERCP. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in eight cases. Delayed bleeding occurred in 10 cases. Delayed perforation was seen only in one case. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 25%. Cumulative local recurrence rate and the overall survival rate were 15% and 96%, respectively. ESDIP may be feasible for duodenal tumors including papilla, and is a potential alternative option to avoid pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Underwater Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Diving into the Depths

The endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract lesions embraces different types of techniques, ranging from conventional polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to the field of third-space endoscopy, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), full-thickness resection and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Parallelly, the advent of underwater techniques has served as an add-on for both basic and advanced procedures, since its first report in 2012. We aimed to provide a comprehensive update on the state of the art about the feasibility of underwater basic and advanced techniques for GI endoscopy. Underwater EMR (U-EMR) has proved effective and safe in treating &gt; 10 mm sessile or flat or all-size recurrent colonic lesions. Conversely, although data show good effectiveness and safety for &lt;10 mm lesions, it is preferred when high-grade dysplasia is suspected, favouring cold snare polypectomy for all other cases. Moreover, promising data are emerging regarding the feasibility of U-ESD for difficult-to-resect colonic lesions. U-EMR represents a standard of care for treating &lt; 25 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumours. Data regarding oesophageal, gastric and ampullary lesions remains limited to small cohorts. Finally, using water immersion for POEM has shown a reduction in procedure time compared to the CO2 insufflation technique for vessel coagulation, albeit in a single-centre experience. Based on these results, U-EMR has become a standard for treating intermediate-size colonic and non-ampullary duodenal lesions, as highlighted also in the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. Promising results have been shown in third-space endoscopy studies, even though further prospective studies are awaited to standardise the technique for both ESD and POEM.

Colorectal tumor comorbidity is common in patients with duodenal tumors: Exploratory cross-sectional study.

Background and study aims The duodenum and colorectum are target organs for familial colorectal adenomatous polyposis, however, the association of duodenal epithelial tumors (DETs) and colorectal tumors is still controversial. The aim of our study was to elucidate the association between DET and colorectal tumor. Patients and methods This was an exploratory cross-sectional study of patients with DETs treated by endoscopic resection at our hospital, between November 2018 and October 2022. Individuals who underwent colonoscopy as part of the health screening comprised the reference control group for comparison. In both groups, lesions suspected of being tumors were resected. The main outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Other outcomes were the detection rate for advanced neoplasia (AN) and risk factors for colorectal adenoma and AN, evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses. Results Analyses were based on data from 163 individuals in the DET group and 177 in the control group. ADR was higher in the DET (63.2%) than in the control (23.6%) group ( P < 0.001). AN and invasive cancer rates were also significantly higher in the DET than in the control group (AN: 20.9% vs 3.4%, respectively, P < 0.001; invasive cancer: 3.1% vs 0%, respectively, P < 0.001). On logistic regression analysis, DET was found to be associated with a 5-fold increase in the detection rate of adenoma and 6-fold increase in AN detection. Conclusions The study revealed significant association between DET and high ADR and a higher frequency of AN and invasive cancer. Screening colonoscopy is suggested for patients with DETs.

A method of “Noninjecting Resection using Bipolar Soft coagulation mode; NIRBS” for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor: a pilot study

BackgroundComplete endoscopic resection of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is technically difficult, especially with an extremely high risk of adverse event (AE), although various endoscopic resection methods including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), underwater EMR (UEMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been tried for SNADETs. Accordingly, a novel simple resection method that can completely resect tumors with a low risk of AEs should be developed.AimsA resection method of Noninjecting Resection using Bipolar Soft coagulation mode (NIRBS) which has been reported to be effective and safe for colorectal lesions is adapted for SNADETs. In this study we evaluated its effectiveness, safety, and simplicity for SNADETs measuring ≤ 20 mm.ResultsThis study included 13 patients with resected lesions with a mean size of 7.8 (range: 3–15) mm. The pathological distributions of the lesions were as follows: adenomas, 77% (n = 10) and benign and non-adenomatous lesions, 23% (n = 3). The en bloc and R0 resection rate was 100% (n = 13). The median procedure duration was 68 s (32–105). None of the patients presented with major AEs including bleeding and perforation.ConclusionsLarge studies such as prospective, randomized, and controlled trials should be conducted for the purpose of validating effectiveness, safety, and simplicity of the NIRBS for SNADETs measuring ≤ 20 mm suggested in this study.

S4872 Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor Presenting as Gastric Outlet Obstruction

S4872 Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor Presenting as Gastric Outlet Obstruction

S4049 Duodenal Neoplasm Causing Severe Gastric Outlet Obstruction Treated with Unique Endoscopic Stenting

S4049 Duodenal Neoplasm Causing Severe Gastric Outlet Obstruction Treated with Unique Endoscopic Stenting

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy after open Roux-en-Y biliary-enteric anastomosis: Technical insights (with video)

TechniqueRobotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) presents a formidable surgical challenge for patients with a prior history of bilioenteric anastomosis. However, there are no reports in the literature of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy after open bilioenteric anastomosis. This article offers a detailed description of the surgical technique employed in performing RPD on a patient who previously underwent open Roux-en-Y biliary–enteric anastomosis, aiming to treat a duodenal tumor. ResultsThe patient underwent a successful surgery with a total operation time of 320 min and an estimated blood loss of approximately 150 ml. Following the procedure, the patient experienced an uncomplicated recovery and was discharged from the hospital after a 14-day hospitalization period. Postoperative pathology revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the duodenum invading the entire layer of the bowel wall. ConclusionsRPD is a safe and viable option for patients with a history of complex abdominal surgery.

The value of a nomogram model based on CT imaging features in differentiating duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors from pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors

The value of a nomogram model based on CT imaging features in differentiating duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors from pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors

Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.

An increasing number of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) have been detected recently owing to the development of endoscopic imaging technology and increased awareness of this disease. Endoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for SNADETs, with methods including cold snare polypectomy (CSP), conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (cEMR), underwater EMR (uEMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Here, we review the current status and recent advances in endoscopic resection for SNADETs. Endoscopic resection in the duodenum is more difficult and has a higher risk of adverse events than that in other organs owing to specific anatomical disadvantages. SNADETs ≤10 mm in size are candidates for CSP, cEMR, and uEMR. Among these lesions, suspected carcinoma lesions should not be treated using CSP because of their low curability. cEMR or uEMR is considered for lesions sized 10 to 20 mm, whereas piecemeal EMR or ESD is considered for tumors >20 mm in size. In particular, ESD or surgical resection should be considered for suspected carcinoma lesions >30 mm in size. The treatment plan should be selected on a case-to-case basis, considering the balance between the risk of adverse events and the necessity of en bloc resection.

Jejunal sarcomatoid carcinoma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Sarcomatoid carcinoma (SCA) of the jejunum is a rare and aggressive neoplasm affecting the smooth muscle cells of the jejunum. This study presents a recent case of jejunal SCA, detailing its diagnosis and treatment, thereby providing a reference for clinical practice. CASE SUMMARY A 65-year-old male presented to Yichang Central People's Hospital with a chief complaint of hemorrhoids. A computed tomography (CT) scan incidentally revealed multiple abnormal signals in the liver. Subsequent positron emission tomography/CT at Wuhan Union Hospital indicated malignant tumor progression, with a primary duodenal tumor and multiple metastases in the upper left abdomen. Intraoperatively, a large tumor was identified on the omentum. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses of the resected specimen confirmed the diagnosis of jejunal SCA. The patient received a combination therapy of sintilimab, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, and anlotinib. Follow-up imaging demonstrated significant reduction of hepatic and peritoneal lesions. The patient has remained stable for over one year postoperatively. CONCLUSION This case suggests that chemotherapy, immunotherapy, plus targeted therapy may represent an optimal treatment for intestinal SCA, meriting further investigation.

Distinctive duodenal microbiomes and bile acid profiles in duodenal tumor patients revealed by prospective observational study

The incidence of duodenal tumors (DTs) is increasing. However, the mechanisms underlying its development remain unclear. Environmental factors, including the microbiome and bile acids (BAs), are believed to influence tumor development. Therefore, we conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study to investigate the potential differences between patients with DTs and healthy controls (HCs) based on these factors. In addition, the BAs in the duodenal fluid were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We recruited 41 patients and performed 16S rRNA-seq. There was no difference in the observed ASVs or PCoA plot of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between the DTs and HCs. The lithocholic acid concentration was significantly lower in the DT group than in the control group. The ratio of CDCA to LCA was significantly higher in patients with DTs. No significant differences in microbiota were observed between DTs and HCs. In patients with DTs, the lithocholic acid concentration in duodenal was significantly lower than in HCs.

Endoscopic versus surgical resection of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms between 10 and 20 mm: A multi-centered retrospective cohort study

IntroductionRecommendations for resection technique of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (D-NEN) with a size between 10 and 20 mm are lacking. The primary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after endoscopic resection (ER) with surgical resection (SR). The secondary aim was to assess the incidence and clinical variables correlated with OS. MethodsData of patients with D-NENs between 2008 and 2018 were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank. ResultsA total of 259 patients were identified, of which 138 were included: 98 (68 %) underwent ER and 44 patients (32 %) underwent SR. Of these, 38 patients had D-NENs sized between 10 and 20 mm. ER Patients were more frequently male and had a lower T-stage and tumour size than SR patients (all P < 0.05). Positive resection margins were observed more frequently after ER compared to SR (71 % vs 15 %, P < 0.005). No patients with tumours between 10 and 20 mm died after ER or SR (median follow-up 71.8 vs. 52.0 months). PFS rates were not significantly different after ER compared to SR (P = 0.672). Recurrence rates were 13 % for ER and 7 % for SR (P = 0.604). ConclusionBetween 2008 and 2018, the incidence increased from 0.06 to 0.11 per 100,000 patients per year. OS after ER or SR did not differ for D-NEN between 10 and 20 mm. Recurrence and PFS rates were not significantly different. These results suggest that D-NENs sized between 10 and 20 mm could potentially be treated first with ER. Future studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Two-stage cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection and papillectomy for duodenal papillary tumors with lateral growth.

Two-stage cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection and papillectomy for duodenal papillary tumors with lateral growth.

Incidental Visualization of Gallbladder on Post-therapy [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Scintigraphy Mimicking a Liver Metastasis in a Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor

AbstractWe present a rare case of physiological uptake of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in the gallbladder, observed post-therapy, in a 47-year-old man with grade I duodenal neuroendocrine tumor (NET), despite no uptake being observed pre-therapy in the somatostatin receptor-positron emission tomography. On planar scintigraphy, the gallbladder uptake could have been misidentified as liver metastasis. By utilizing single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging, we were able to precisely localize the tracer and obtain anatomical morphological characteristics, thereby averting the potential for misinterpretation of liver metastasis resulting from the gallbladder's physiological uptake of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in NET patients.

Treatment outcomes of endoscopic resection for nonampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors.

The incidence rate of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors has been increasing in recent years. Endoscopic resection [ER; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)] is recommended for nonampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NAD-NETs) ≤10 mm in diameter that are confined to the submucosal layer and without lymph node or distant metastasis. However, the efficacy and safety of and indications for EMR/ESD remain unclear. Between November 2011 and April 2021, 12 NAD-NETs in 12 patients who underwent either EMR or ESD were analyzed retrospectively. The rates of en bloc resection, complete resection, pathologic complete resection, margin involvement, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, complications and prognosis were determined during follow-up (median observation period 53.0 months). EMR was performed for two tumors, and ESD was performed for ten tumors. En bloc resection was performed for both tumors (100%) in the EMR group, and complete resection was achieved in one case (50%). Pathological complete resection was achieved in one case (50%), while in the ESD group, these three rates were 90% (9/10), 80% (8/10), and 80% (8/10), respectively. Intraoperative perforation occurred in one patient (10%) during ESD treatment, with no intraoperative or delayed bleeding in either group. Recurrence and distant metastasis were not observed during the mean follow-up period of 53.0 months (range, 18-131 months). For NAD-NETs that measure ≤10 mm in size, are confined to the submucosal layer and have neither suspicious lymph nodes nor distant metastasis, ER (EMR and ESD) may be a safe, effective, and feasible endoscopic technique for removing them.

Особливості виникнення поширеного перитоніту та вплив поліморфізму гена 5,10-метилентетрагідрофолатредуктази

It is relevant in modern surgery to clarify the risk factors of widespread peritonitis and to improve the treatment and diagnostic algorithms for the management of such patients. Aim - to establish the features of the occurrence of widespread peritonitis and the influence of MTHFR gene polymorphisms on the risk of its occurrence. Materials and methods. The study included 100 patients who underwent surgical interventions for acute abdominal diseases complicated by peritonitis: acute appendicitis (48%), acute cholecystitis (32%), perforated ulcer of the stomach or duodenum (8%), tumor perforation (3%), injuries of the abdominal cavity (3%), pinched hernia (2%) and intestinal obstruction (4%). Genotypes of MTHFR gene polymorphisms rs1801131 and rs1801133 were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mathematical processing of the research results was carried out using the Statistica 10 program. Results. The risk of disseminated peritonitis was increased with perforated gastric or duodenal ulcer, tumor perforation, abdominal trauma, herniated hernia, or intestinal obstruction compared with acute appendicitis and cholecystitis. The risk of disseminated peritonitis was lower in II blood group carriers compared and was associated with temperature at hospitalization and pulse rate. Conclusions. The factors determining the risk of disseminated peritonitis in the multivariate regression model were the diagnosis, heart rate, and the rs1801131 genotype of the MTHFR gene. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. No conflict of interests was declared by the authors.