Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors Research Articles

Endoscopic muscularis dissection with over-the-scope clip: Novel resection technique for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors.

Watch a video of this article.

False-Negative Neuroendocrine Tumor Identified With 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT: A Case of Well-Differentiated Somatostatinoma.

We report the case of a 25-year-old man who was undergoing follow-up for neurofibromatosis type 1. The man underwent 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT for a suspected well-differentiated duodenal neuroendocrine tumor. This examination did not reveal any significant uptake, whereas complementary 18F-FDG PET/CT showed moderate 18F-FDG uptake in the primary tumor as well as the adenopathy. Histology, a well-differentiated duodenal neuroendocrine tumor was confirmed, consistent with the diagnosis of somatostatinoma. Although rare, this well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor should be kept in mind as a possible source of false-negative somatostatin receptor PET/CT findings.

Clinical Outcome of Patients with Gastric, Duodenal, or Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors after Incomplete Endoscopic Resection.

Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the clinical outcome of patients with well-differentiated gastric, duodenal, and rectal neuroendocrine tumors after treatment with incomplete endoscopic resection due to the finding of microscopic positive resection margins (R1). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with type 1 gastric, non-ampullary non-functioning duodenal, or rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms with positive R1 margins after endoscopic resection. The rate of tumor recurrence and progression-free survival were considered to be the study's main endpoints. Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc® v.17 software and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. A Cox proportional-hazard regression was performed to identify risk factors for disease recurrence/progression. Results: After evaluating 110 patients, a total of 58 patients were included in the final analysis (15 gastric NENs, 12 duodenal NENs, and 31 rectal NENs). After evidence of endoscopic R1 resection had been gathered, 26 patients (44.8%) underwent an endoscopic/surgical extension of the previous resection. Tumor progression (all local recurrences) occurred in five out of fifty-eight patients (8.6%) with a median PFS of 36 months. There were no tumor-related deaths. G2 grading and the gastric primary tumor site were the only features significantly associated with the risk of recurrence of the disease (HR: 11.97 [95% CI: 1.22-116.99], HR: 12.54 [95% CI: 1.28-122.24], respectively). Conclusions: Tumor progression rarely occurs in patients with microscopic positive margin excision (R1) after endoscopic resection and does not seem to affect patients' clinical outcomes.

Factors Associated with Gastric and Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor Development

Factors Associated with Gastric and Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor Development

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor successfully removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection with adaptative traction device.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor successfully removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection with adaptative traction device.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of duodenal neuroendocrine tumours: A comparative study of ampullary and nonampullary regions.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (DNETs) are rare neoplasms. However, the incidence of DNETs has been increasing in recent years, especially as an incidental finding during endoscopic studies. Regrettably, there is no consensus regarding the ideal treatment of DNETs. Even there are few studies on the clinical features and survival analysis of DNETs. To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with duodenal neuroendocrine tumours. The clinical data of DNETs diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University from June 2011 to July 2022 were collected. Neuroendocrine tumours located in the ampulla area of the duodenum were divided into the ampullary region group; neuroendocrine tumours in any part of the duodenum outside the ampullary area were divided into the nonampullary region group. Using a retrospective study, the clinical characteristics of the two groups and risk factors affecting the survival of DNET patients were analysed. Twenty-nine DNET patients were screened. The male to female ratio was 1:1.9, and females comprised the majority. The ampullary region group accounted for 24.1% (7/29), while the nonampullary region group accounted for 75.9% (22/29). When diagnosed, the clinical symptoms of the ampullary region group were mainly abdominal pain (85.7%), while those of the nonampullary region groups were mainly abdominal distension (59.1%). There were differences in the composition of staging of tumours between the two groups (Fisher's exact probability method, P = 0.001), with nonampullary stage II tumours (68.2%) being the main stage (P < 0.05). After the diagnosis of DNETs, the survival rate of the ampullary region group was 14.3% (1/7), which was lower than that of 72.7% (16/22) in the nonampullary region group (Fisher's exact probability method, P = 0.011). The survival time of the ampullary region group was shorter than that of the nonampullary region group (P < 0.000). The median survival time of the ampullary region group was 10.0 months and that of the nonampullary region group was 451.0 months. Multivariate analysis showed that tumours in the ampulla region and no surgical treatment after diagnosis were independent risk factors for the survival of DNET patients (HR = 0.029, 95%CI 0.004-0.199, P < 0.000; HR = 12.609, 95%CI: 2.889-55.037, P = 0.001). Further analysis of nonampullary DNET patients showed that the survival time of patients with a tumour diameter < 2 cm was longer than that of patients with a tumour diameter ≥ 2 cm (t = 7.243, P = 0.048). As of follow-up, 6 patients who died of nonampullary DNETs had a tumour diameter that was ≥ 2 cm, and 3 patients in stage IV had liver metastasis. Patients with a tumour diameter < 2 cm underwent surgical treatment, and all survived after surgery. Surgical treatment is a protective factor for prolonging the survival of DNET patients. Compared to DNETs in the ampullary region, patients in the nonampullary region group had a longer survival period. The liver is the organ most susceptible to distant metastasis of nonampullary DNETs.

Endoscopic Resection for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms between 10 and 20 mm-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background. The optimal management of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNENs) sized 10-20 mm remains controversial and although endoscopic resection is increasingly performed instead of surgery, the therapeutic approach in this setting is not fully standardized. We performed a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis to clarify the outcomes of endoscopic resection for 10-20 mm dNENs in terms of efficacy (i.e., recurrence rate) and safety. Methods. A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify pertinent articles published until January 2023. Results. Seven retrospective studies were included in this systematic review. The overall recurrence rate was 14.6% (95%CI 5.4-27.4) in 65 patients analyzed, without significant heterogeneity. When considering studies specifically focused on endoscopic mucosal resection, the recurrence rate was 20.5% (95%CI 10.7-32.4), without significant heterogeneity. The ability to obtain the free margin after endoscopic resection ranged between 36% and 100%. No complications were observed in the four studies reporting this information. Conclusions. Endoscopic resection could be the first treatment option in patients with dNENs sized 10-20 mm and without evidence of metastatic disease. Further studies are needed to draw more solid conclusions, particularly in terms of superiority among the available endoscopic techniques.

A Clinicopathological Appraisal of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors at a Racially Diverse Safety Net Hospital.

Significant knowledge gaps exist regarding clinicopathological profiling as well as treatment, surveillance, and survival of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (dNETs). We clinicopathologically characterized and identified racial differences among patients with dNETs at a large safety net hospital. Tumor grades were updated based on the World Health Organization 2019 NET classification, and overall survival was determined. We identified 17 dNETs and found no differences in clinicopathologic characteristics across racial groups. Pathological diagnosis was upgraded in 35% of dNETs, and age >65 years significantly shortened overall survival. Larger-scale studies are needed to determine the significance of these findings.

Factors associated with gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: A multicenter case-control study

Background and AimsThe incidence of gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (GNET and DNET, respectively) is increasing, however associated factors of these diseases are not well known. Here, we investigated the factors associated with GNET and DNET. MethodsPatients with GNET and DNET presenting at eight tertiary referral centers between 2001 and 2020 were included and compared with healthy controls who underwent upper endoscopic screening. Clinical factors and laboratory data were analyzed to determine associated factors of GNET and DNET. ResultsOverall, 396 patients with GNET and 193 patients with DNET were included and compared with 1725 healthy controls. Multivariate analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR] 0.98), diabetes (OR 1.72), hypertension (OR 1.97), low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (OR 2.54), and past/present H. pylori infection (OR 1.46) were significantly associated with GNET. In contrast, DNET was significantly associated with diabetes (OR 1.80), hypertension (OR 1.68), low serum HDL-C levels (OR 2.29), and past/present H. pylori infection (OR 5.42). In the sex-based subgroup analysis in GNET, current smoking was strongly associated in women (OR 9.85), but not in men. ConclusionsThis study identified several common metabolic factors associated with GNET and DNET. Additionally, some factors had sex-specific associations.

Beyond MEN1, when to think about MEN4? Retrospective study on 5600 patients in the French population & literature review.

Germline CDKN1B variants predispose patients to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4), a rare MEN1-like syndrome, with <100 reported cases since its discovery in 2006. Although CDKN1B mutations are frequently suggested to explain cases of genetically-negative MEN1, the prevalence and phenotype of MEN4 patients is poorly known, and genetic counseling is unclear. To evaluate the prevalence of MEN4 in MEN1-suspected patients and characterize the phenotype of MEN4 patients. Retrospective observational nationwide study. Narrative review of literature and variant class reassessment. We included all adult patients with class 3/4/5 CDKN1B variants identified by the laboratories from the French TENGEN network between 2015 and 2022 through germline genetic testing for MEN1 suspicion. After class reassessment, we compared the phenotype of symptomatic patients with class 4/5 CDKN1B variants, i.e. with genetically-confirmed MEN4 diagnosis, in our series and in literature with 66 matched MEN1 patients from the UMD-MEN1 database. From 5600 MEN1-suspected patients analyzed, four patients with class 4/5 CDKN1B variant were found (0.07%). They presented with multiple duodenal NET, PHPT and adrenal nodule, isolated PHPT, PHPT and pNET. We listed 29 patients with CDKN1B class 4/5 variants from literature. Compared to matched MEN1 patients, MEN4 patients presented lower NET incidence and older age at PHPT diagnosis. The prevalence of MEN4 is low. PHPT and PA represent the main associated lesions, NETs are rare. Our results suggest a milder and later phenotype than in MEN1. Our observations will help to improve genetic counseling and management of MEN4 families.

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumor after bilateral breast cancer with type 1 neurofibromatosis: a case report

BackgroundYoung women with NF1 are at a high risk of developing breast cancer. Although they are at risk for abdominal tumors, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors and neuroendocrine tumors, follow-up strategies for other tumors after breast cancer have not yet been established. Here, we present a case of duodenal neuroendocrine tumor found during follow-up after bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer with type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1), for which pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and lymphadenectomy were performed.Case presentationA 46-year-old woman with NF1 was referred to our hospital for treatment of a duodenal submucosal tumor. Her previous operative history included bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer: right total mastectomy and left partial mastectomy performed 9 and 5 years ago, respectively. Her daughter was confirmed to have NF1, but her parents were unclear. Although she had no recurrence or symptoms during the follow-up for her breast cancer, she wished to undergo 18-fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography (FDG–PET) for systemic screening. FDG–PET demonstrated FDG accumulation in the duodenal tumor with a maximum standardized uptake value of 5.78. Endoscopy revealed a 20-mm-diameter tumor in the second duodenal portion, and endoscopic biopsy suggested a NET G1. We performed PD and lymphadenectomy for complete. She was doing well without recurrence and was followed up with PET tomography–computed tomography.ConclusionsEarly detection of gastrointestinal tumors is difficult, because most of them are asymptomatic. Gastrointestinal screening is important for patients with NF1, and PD with lymphadenectomy is feasible for managing duodenal neuroendocrine tumors, depending on their size.

Spatial profiling reveals tissue-specific neuro-immune interactions in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are heterogeneous malignancies that arise from complex cellular interactions within the tissue microenvironment. Here, we sought to decipher tumor-derived signals from the surrounding microenvironment by applying digital spatial profiling (DSP) to hormone-secreting and non-functional GEP-NETs. By combining this approach with in vitro studies of human-derived organoids, we demonstrated the convergence of cell autonomous immune and pro-inflammatory proteins that suggests their role in neuroendocrine differentiation and tumorigenesis. DSP was used to evaluate the expression of 40 neural- and immune-related proteins in surgically resected duodenal and pancreatic NETs (n = 20) primarily consisting of gastrinomas (18/20). A total of 279 regions of interest were examined between tumors, adjacent normal and abnormal-appearing epithelium, and the surrounding stroma. The results were stratified by tissue type and multiple endocrine neoplasia I (MEN1) status, whereas protein expression was validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). A tumor immune cell autonomous inflammatory signature was further evaluated by IHC and RNAscope, while functional pro-inflammatory signaling was confirmed using patient-derived duodenal organoids. Gastrin-secreting and non-functional pancreatic NETs showed a higher abundance of immune cell markers and immune infiltrate compared with duodenal gastrinomas. Compared with non-MEN1 tumors, MEN1 gastrinomas and preneoplastic lesions showed strong immune exclusion and upregulated expression of neuropathological proteins. Despite a paucity of immune cells, duodenal gastrinomas expressed the pro-inflammatory and pro-neural factor IL-17B. Treatment of human duodenal organoids with IL-17B activated NF-κB and STAT3 signaling and induced the expression of neuroendocrine markers. In conclusion, multiplexed spatial protein analysis identified tissue-specific neuro-immune signatures in GEP-NETs. Duodenal gastrinomas are characterized by an immunologically cold microenvironment that permits cellular reprogramming and neoplastic transformation of the preneoplastic epithelium. Moreover, duodenal gastrinomas cell autonomously express immune and pro-inflammatory factors, including tumor-derived IL-17B, that stimulate the neuroendocrine phenotype. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection with reopenable clip-over-the-line method for a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor.

Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection with reopenable clip-over-the-line method for a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor.

A case of primary duodenal NET that recurred 17 years later as multiple liver metastases and obstructive jaundice

A case of primary duodenal NET that recurred 17 years later as multiple liver metastases and obstructive jaundice

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors: Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection performed in the Western setting.

Background and study aims Endoscopic resection (ER) is recommended for the management of duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (D-NETs) confined to the submucosal layer, without lymph node or distant metastasis. While this is accepted practice for lesions < 10 mm, consensus for larger lesions remains unclear. Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed as the preferred ER technique for DNETs ≥10 mm, there are limited data on efficacy and safety, particularly in the Western setting. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with D-NETs who underwent ESD between 2012 and 2022 in three tertiary referral centers in Australia, France, and Belgium. Results Fourteen patients with 15 D-NETs were evaluated. Median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-70 years). All D-NETs were confined to the duodenal bulb. Median D-NET size was 10 mm (IQR 7-12 mm) and specimen size was 15 mm (IQR 15-20 mm). Median procedure time was 60 minutes (IQR 25-90 minutes). The rate of en bloc resection was 100%. Intra-procedural perforation occurred in four patients (26.7%), with all closed endoscopically without long-term sequelae. There were no episodes of clinically significant bleeding. No local recurrence, lymph node or distant metastasis was observed at a median follow-up of 19.9 months (IQR 10.3-49.3 months). Conclusions In experienced hands, ESD for D-NETs can achieve a 100% en bloc resection rate. There were no cases of local recurrence or distant metastatic spread, indicating that ESD may be a viable option for patients with D-NETs 10 to 15 mm that are not surgical candidates.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (d-NETs) ≤ 10 mm in size, confined to the submucosal layer, without lymph node or distant metastasis, can be treated safely and effectively by endoscopic management. However, most results are based on limited data and short follow-up outcomes. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for d-NETs. We retrospectively analyzed 63 patients with 68 d-NETs who had undergone endoscopic resection at two hospitals between January 2009 and December 2021. En-bloc resection, endoscopically complete resection, and histopathologically complete resection rates were evaluated as short-term outcomes. Furthermore, long-term outcomes were analyzed in 46 patients with 50 d-NETs with a follow-up period of > 1 year. The overall en-bloc, endoscopically complete, and histopathologically complete resection rates were 92.6% (63/68), 100% (68/68), and 69.1% (47/68), respectively. Tumor size (> 5 mm) was the only predictive factor for histopathologically incomplete resection (p = 0.015). The procedure-related bleeding and perforation rates were 0% and 5.9%, respectively. No recurrences were observed in patients with histopathologically complete resection and those with histopathologically incomplete resection at a median follow-up period of 48 months (range 12–132 months). Endoscopic resection for d-NETs ≤ 10 mm in size, limited to the submucosal layer, and without lymph node or distant metastasis provides favorable long-term outcomes when endoscopically complete resection is achieved.

Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms on enhanced CT: establishing a diagnostic model with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the non-ampullary area and analyzing the value of predicting prognosis

ObjectiveTo identify CT features and establish a diagnostic model for distinguishing non-ampullary duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNENs) from non-ampullary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (dGISTs) and to analyze overall survival outcomes of all dNENs patients.Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 98 patients with pathologically confirmed dNENs (n = 44) and dGISTs (n = 54). Clinical data and CT characteristics were collected. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors and establish a diagnostic model between non-ampullary dNENs (n = 22) and dGISTs (n = 54). The ROC curve was created to determine diagnostic ability. Cox proportional hazards models were created and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed for survival analysis of dNENs (n = 44).ResultsThree CT features were identified as independent predictors of non-ampullary dNENs, including intraluminal growth pattern (OR 0.450; 95% CI 0.206–0.983), absence of intratumoral vessels (OR 0.207; 95% CI 0.053–0.807) and unenhanced lesion > 40.76 HU (OR 5.720; 95% CI 1.575–20.774). The AUC was 0.866 (95% CI 0.765–0.968), with a sensitivity of 90.91% (95% CI 70.8–98.9%), specificity of 77.78% (95% CI 64.4–88.0%), and total accuracy rate of 81.58%. Lymph node metastases (HR: 21.60), obstructive biliary and/or pancreatic duct dilation (HR: 5.82) and portal lesion enhancement ≤ 99.79 HU (HR: 3.02) were independent prognostic factors related to poor outcomes.ConclusionWe established a diagnostic model to differentiate non-ampullary dNENs from dGISTs. Besides, we found that imaging features on enhanced CT can predict OS of patients with dNENs.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) G1-G3.

The aim of the present guidance paper was to update the previous ENETS guidelines on well-differentiated gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), providing practical guidance for specialists in the diagnosis and management of gastroduodenal NETs. Type II gastric NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and functioning duodenal NETs are not covered, since they will be discussed in other ENETS guidance papers.

Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery for the duodenal neuroendocrine tumor: a single-center case series (How I Do It).

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (D-NETs) are uncommon. The surgical treatment for D-NETs was in debate. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a promising approach for treating gastrointestinal tumors. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LECS for D-NETs. Meanwhile, the authors described the details of the LECS technique. All patients diagnosed with D-NETs underwent LECS between September 2018 and April 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The endoscopic procedures were performed with endoscopic full-thickness resection. The defect was manually closed under the surveillance of the laparoscopy. A total of seven patients were enrolled, including three men and four women. The median age was 58 years (ranging from 39-65). Four tumors were located in the bulb and three in the second portion. All cases were diagnosed as NET with grade G1. The tumor depth was pT1 in two cases and pT2 in five cases. The median specimen size and the tumor size were 22mm (ranging from 10-30) and 8.0mm (ranging from 2.3-13.0), respectively. En-bloc resection and curative resection rates are 100 and 85.7%, respectively. There were no severe complications. Until 1 June 2022, there was no recurrence. The median follow-up was 9.5 months (range, 1.4-45.1). LECS with endoscopic full-thickness resection is a reliable surgical procedure. The minimally invasive advantages of LECS enable more individualized treatment options for a specific group. Limited by the length of observation, the long-term performance of LECS for D-NETs requires additional investigation.

A-140 MANAGEMENT OF NON-METASTATIC DUODENAL NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS

Abstract Background The management of duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (NET) between 1 and 2 cm is not codified. Currently, depending on the centre, endoscopic (ER) or surgical (SR) resection is offered. The main objective of our study was to describe the management of non-metastatic duodenal NETs in France. Methods A study was conducted on 153 patients with non-metastatic duodenal NET diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 in 14 French centres by the GTE group (Endocrine Tumors Group). Results 58 (37.9%) patients treated with ER and 95 (62.1%) patients treated with SR were found. Surgery allowed significantly more complete resection than endoscopy (p &amp;lt; 0.001). ER margins were significantly less well-defined than SR margins (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Among the 51 patients with positive lymph node dissection, tumour size was ≤ 1 cm in 25 cases, between 1 and 2 cm in 14 cases and ≥ 2 cm in 12 patients. No difference in survival was demonstrated regardless of type of treatment. Surgical complications were more numerous than endoscopic complications (p = 0.001). Regardless of the type of incomplete resection, there was no significant difference between the two groups according to the criteria of location, size, grade, or adenopathy. In the subgroup analysis of duodenal NETs between 11 and 19 mm, the tumour stages were equivalent in pre-procedure between the two groups. In contrast, there was a difference in post-procedure after anatomopathological analysis (p = 0.001). Conclusion Based on the study results, the type of endoscopic or surgical resection of duodenal NETs has no impact on the long-term results. Lymph node invasion is independent of tumour size.