Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Microinvasion Patients Research Articles

Meta-analysis on axillary lymph node metastasis rate in ductal carcinoma insitu with microinvasion.

To address the question of axillary lymph node staging in ductal carcinoma insitu with microinvasion (DCIS-MI), we retrospectively evaluated axillary lymph nodes metastasis (ALNM) rate in a cohort of postsurgical DCIS-MI patients. By analyzing these data, we aimed to generate clinically relevant insights to inform treatment decision-making for this patient population. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database, Wipe, and China Biomedical Literature Database to identify relevant publications in any language. All the analyses were performed using Stata 16.0 software. Among the 28 studies involving 8279 patients, the pooled analysis revealed an ALNM rate of 8% (95% CI, 7% to 10%) in patients with DCIS-MI. Furthermore, the rates of axillary lymph node macrometastasis, micrometastasis, and ITC in patients with DCIS-MI were 2% (95% CI, 2% to 3%), 3% (95% CI, 2% to 4%), and 2% (95% CI, 1% to 3%), respectively. Moreover, 13 studies investigated the non-sentinel lymph node (Non-SLN) metastasis rate, encompassing a total of 1236 DCIS-MI cases. The pooled analysis identified a Non-SLN metastasis rate of 33% (95% CI, 14% to 55%) in patients with DCIS-MI. The SLNB for patients with DCIS-MI is justifiable and could provide a novel therapeutic basis for systemic treatment decisions.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Microinvasion

A retrospective study on 90 eligible HER2+ ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS-MI) patients was performed with a median follow-up time of 57 months. The baseline was consistent between the 4-cycle and 6-cycle chemotherapy groups. There were more patients with multiple foci of micrometastasis in the target therapy group in the two groups with or without target therapy (p < 0.01). Postoperative chemotherapy with a 4-cycle regimen can achieve the expected therapeutic effect in patients with HER2+ DCIS-MI, but the role of target therapy in HER2+ DCIS-MI patients has not been confirmed.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: A SEER population-based study.

Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS-MI) is a special type of breast cancer. It is an invasive lesion less than 1.0 mm in size related to simple ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in DCIS-MI often indicates a poor prognosis. Therefore, the management of lymph nodes plays a vital role in the treatment strategy of DCIS-MI. Since DCIS-MI is often diagnosed by postoperative paraffin section and immunohistochemical detection, to obtain the best clinical benefits for such patients, we aim to establish and verify a nomogram to predict the possibility of lymph node metastasis in DCIS-MI patients and help preoperative or intraoperative clinical decision-making. A retrospective analysis of patients with DCIS-MI in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2019 was performed. The study cohort was randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. The risk factors were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses in the training cohort, and a nomogram was constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the nomogram in the training set and validation set. An independent data cohort was obtained from the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Breast Cancer Database (SJTU-BCDB) for external validation. This study included 3951 female patients from SEER with DCIS-MI, including 244 patients with regional lymph node metastasis, accounting for 6.18% of the total. An independent test set of 323 patients from SJTU-BCDB was used for external validation. According to the multifactorial logistic regression analysis results, age at diagnosis, ethnicity, grade, and surgical modality were included in the prediction model. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were 0.739 (95% CI: 0.702~0.775), 0.732 (95% CI: 0.675~0.788), and 0.707 (95%CI: 0.607-0.807) in the training, validation and external test groups, suggesting that the column line graphs had excellent differentiation. The calibration curves slope was close to 1, and the model's predicted values were in good agreement with the actual values. The DCA curves showed good clinical utility. In this study, we constructed accurate and practical columnar maps with some clinical benefit to predict the likelihood of lymph node metastasis in patients with postoperatively diagnosed DCIS-MI and provide a reference value for specifying treatment strategies.

KRT15 in early breast cancer screening and correlation with HER2 positivity, pathological gradeand N stage.

Objective: This study was designed to explore KRT15 dysregulation and its correlation with clinical characteristics among ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-MI)and invasive breast cancer (IBC) patients. Methods: KRT15 from lesion samples of 50 DCIS patients, 48 DCIS-MI patientsand 50 IBC patients was detected by immunohistochemistry. Results: KRT15 discriminated IBC patients from DCIS patients (area under the curve [AUC] =0.895; 95% CI=0.836-0.954) and DCIS-MI patients (AUC=0.707; 95% CI=0.606-0.808). In DCIS patients, KRT15 was negatively correlated with pathological grade (p=0.015). In DCIS-MI patients, KRT15 was positively related to estrogen receptor positivity but negatively associated with Ki-67 (both p<0.05). In IBC patients, KRT15 was negativelylinked to HER2 positivity, histological grade, N stageand tumor node metastasis stage (all p<0.05). Conclusion: KRT15 assessmentmay help with early breast cancer screening.

Survival outcomes after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS-MI) is a subtype of breast cancer with a good prognosis, for which both breast conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (BCS + RT) and mastectomy are feasible surgical methods, but no clear conclusion has been made on the choice of these treatments. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database to extract 5432 DCIS-MI patients. Participants were divided into the BCS + RT group and the mastectomy group. We compared the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of the two groups using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regressions before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Before PSM, both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that BCS + RT group had significantly higher OS and BCSS compared with patients in the mastectomy group (P < 0.001). After PSM, the multivariate analysis showed that compared with mastectomy, the BCS + RT showed significantly higher OS and BCSS (HR = 0.676, 95% CI = 0.540–0.847, P < 0.001; HR = 0.565,95% CI = 0.354–0.903, P = 0.017). In addition, the subgroup analysis showed that BCS + RT is at least equivalent to mastectomy with respect to OS and BCSS in any subgroup. For patients with DCIS-MI, the prognosis of BCS + RT was superior to mastectomy.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-Mi) of the breast

ObjectiveOur purpose is to evaluate the correlation of TILs with clinicopathological characteristics and disease free survival (DFS) in DCIS and DCIS-Mi breast cancer (BC) patients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 360 DCIS patients and 125 DCIS-Mi patients treated by a single institution from 2016 to 2019. TILs are regarded as continuous variables and are divided into low (≤ 5%), medium (5–40%) and high (≥ 40%) for statistical analysis.ResultsIn DCIS and DCIS-Mi patients, larger tumor size, higher nuclear grade, hormone receptor (HR) negativity and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2) overexpression are all related to high TILs (P < 0.05). In addition, compared with DCIS, DCIS-Mi patients were significantly associated with high TILs (P < 0.001). Based on the different results of the subtypes, we further studied the correlation between TILs and DFS in 279 cases of HER2+ patients (204 of DCIS; 75 of DCIS-Mi). In HER2+ group, DCIS-Mi was significantly associated with HR negativity (P = 0.015) and high TILs (P = 0.002) compared with DCIS patients. In the survival analysis, we found that TILs had no effect on the DFS of DCIS (P = 0.938), DCIS-Mi (P = 0.807), and HER2+ (P = 0.379) BC patients. In the univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis, the correlation between TILs and the prognosis of DFS has not been confirmed in the three BC groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionTILs have played an non-negligible role in the progress of DCIS to DCIS-Mi, especially in HER2+ BC. The predictive and prognostic value of TILs still needs further research to confirm.

Prognostic Factors and a Nomogram Predicting Survival in Patients with Breast Ductal Carcinoma in situ with Microinvasion: A Population-Based Study.

PurposeDuctal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) can be challenging to balance the risks of overtreatment versus undertreatment. We aim to identify prognostic factors in patients with DCISM and construct a nomogram to predict breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).Materials and MethodsA retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with DCISM from 1988 to 2015 who were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Clinical variables and tumor characteristics were evaluated, and Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed. A nomogram was constructed from the multivariate logistic regression to combine all the prognostic factors to predict the prognosis of DCISM patients at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years.ResultsWe identified 5438 total eligible breast cancer patients with a median and max survival time of 78 and 227 months, respectively. Here, patients with poorer survival outcomes were those diagnosed between 1988 and 2001, African-American race, under 40 years of age, higher tumor N stage, progesterone receptor-negative tumor, and received no surgery. The nomogram was constructed by the seven variables and passed the calibration and validation steps. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of both the training set and the validating set (5-year AUC: 0.77 and 0.88, 10-year AUC: 0.75 and 0.73, 15-year AUC: 0.72 and 0.65). Receiving chemotherapy was associated with a better BCSS (hazard ratio, HR=0.45, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 0.23–0.89), especially in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) negative, progesterone receptor (PR) negative (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13–0.97) and ER+PR-/ER-PR+ DCISM (HR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01–0.59).ConclusionOur current study is the first to construct nomograms of patients with DCISM which could help physicians identify breast cancer patients that more likely to benefit from more intensive treatment and follow-up. Chemotherapy might benefit patients with ER-PR- and ER+PR-/ER-PR+ DCISM.

Characteristics, prognosis, risk factors, and management of recently diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion.

BackgroundDuctal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) represents ~1% of all breast cancer cases and is arguably a more aggressive subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Lacking studies with a large population, the survival outcomes of DCISM are still poorly understood and the treatment recommendations remain controversial. This study aims to investigate the long‐term outcome of patients with DCISM, potential risk factors for their prognosis, and the difference of survival between patients treated with breast‐conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (BCT + RT) and mastectomy only.MethodsIn total, 1299 patients from 2008 to 2019 with DCISM were retrospectively retrieved. Clinicopathological features were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was conducted between patients who underwent BCT + RT and mastectomy only. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. Differences of survival between two groups were compared using the log‐rank test.ResultsTotally, 1286 patients had follow‐up information, the median follow‐up is 54.57 months, the 5‐year local–regional‐free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were 98.6%, 97.1%, and 99.4%, respectively, two deaths were due to breast cancer. Multivariate analysis identified age <40 (p = 0.028) and close margin (≤2 mm) as independent negative prognostic factors for LRFS. No prognostic factors were identified for DMFS and OS. The 5‐year LRFS, DMFS, and OS of patients who had DCIS component ≥5 cm and underwent mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy were 100%, 98.4%, and 98.4%, respectively. After propensity score matching (PSM), no survival difference was observed between patients treated with BCT + RT or mastectomy only.ConclusionsDCISM patients had a good survival, even those with DCIS component ≥5 cm. Patients aged <40 or with close margin (≤2 mm) had a poorer LRFS, but not DMFS or OS. BCT + RT is a feasible choice for DCISM patients.

Clinical and imaging characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion.

BackgroundWe analyzed the clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) and breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).MethodsWe analyzed the records of 40 patients diagnosed with DCISM and 61 patients with DCIS who were hospitalized at Shengjing Hospital (Shenyang, China) from January 2009 to June 2016. The size, hardness, and degree of calcification of tumors were determined by mammography and ultrasonography.ResultsIn all, 37 DCISM patients and 45 DCIS patients showed clinical palpable masses (92.5% vs 73.77%, P = 0.018). Mammography showed that the mean size of tumor was larger in DCISM patients than that of DCIS patients (3.13 ± 1.51 vs 2.68 ± 1.77, P = 0.030). Ultrasound examination revealed calcification shadows in the solid tumor mass in 17 DCISM cases and 11 DCIS patients (42.5 vs 18.03%, P = 0.007). Furthermore, estrogen receptor positivity and progesterone receptor positivity were more common in DCIS patients (32.5% vs 54.10%, P = 0.033; 22.5% vs 45.90%, P = 0.017), and the percentage of menopausal patients were higher in DCISM patients than that of DCIS patients (70.00% vs 47.54%, P = 0.026).ConclusionClinically palpable and calcified tumor masses on sonography are more commonly encountered in DCISM lesions.

Clinical comparison between ductal carcinoma in situ and ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

Objective To analyze the differences in the treatment patterns, clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes and prognostic factors between breast cancer patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS-MI). Methods Clinical data of 866 female patients including 631 DCIS cases and 235 DCIS-MI cases treated in our institution between 1999 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The prognostic factors were identified by Log-rank test. Results Similar LC, DFS and OS rates were obtained between two groups (all P>0.05). The univariate analysis demonstrated that Her-2-positive patients had worse OS and DFS than Her-2-negative counterparts. Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy had lower LC and DFS rates compared with those receiving radical mastectomy. Conclusions DCIS and DCIS-MI patients have similar clinical prognosis in terms of OS, LC and DFS. Her-2 positive is an unfavorable prognostic factor for DFS and OS. The LC and DFS rates in the breast-conserving surgery alone group are worse than those in the mastectomy group. Key words: Breast ductal carcinoma in situ; Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion; Breast neoplasm/radiotherapy; Breast neoplasm/surgery; Prognosis

Values of 5mC, 5hmC, and TET2 for identifying the presence and progression of breast precancerous lesion.

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the correlations of 5‐methylcytosine (5mC), 5‐hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), and ten‐eleven translocation enzyme 2 (TET2) expressions in lesion tissue with histological classification of breast precancerous lesion.MethodsEighty‐three patients with breast ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN), 20 patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS‐MI), and 10 patients with invasive breast cancer were included. Histological classification of the DIN patients was classified as DIN1A, DIN1B, DIN1C, DIN2, and DIN3. 5mC, 5hmC, and TET2 expressions in lesion tissues from biopsy were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay.Results5hmC and TET2 were negatively associated with histological classification as validated by both IHC score and IHC semi‐quantification expression grades in total patients (all P < .05); however, no correlation of 5mC with histological classification was found (all P > .05). 5mC (P = .004) was negatively but 5hmC (P < .001) was positively correlated with TET2, while no association of 5mC with 5hmC was discovered in total patients (P = .078). In addition, 5mC was positively associated with ER expression in total patients (P = .040). In subgroups, 5mC was negatively correlated with 5hmC in DIN1C patients (P = .023) and invasive cancer patients (P = .044), and 5mC was negatively associated with TET2 in DIN1B patients (P = .004) as well as DCIS‐MI patients (P = .003).Conclusion5hmC and TET2 have the potentials to serve as biomarkers that could assist in the identification of presence and progression of breast precancerous lesion.

DCIS with Microinvasion: Is It In Situ or Invasive Disease?

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with microinvasion (DCISM) can be challenging in balancing the risks of overtreatment versus undertreatment. We compared DCISM, pure DCIS, and small volume (T1a) invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) as related to histopathology, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes. Women ages 18-90years who underwent breast surgery for DCIS, DCISM, or T1a IDC were selected from the SEER Database (2004-2015). Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of diagnosis with treatment and survival, respectively. A total of 134,569 women were identified: 3.2% DCISM, 70.9% DCIS, and 25.9% with T1a IDC. Compared with invasive disease, DCISM was less likely to be ER+ or PR+ and more likely to be HER2+. After adjustment, DCIS and invasive patients were less likely to undergo mastectomy than DCISM patients (DCIS: OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.49-0.56; invasive: OR 0.86, CI 0.81-0.92). For those undergoing lumpectomy, the likelihood of receiving radiation was similar for DCISM and invasive patients but lower for DCIS patients (OR 0.57, CI 0.52-0.63). After adjustment, breast-cancer-specific survival was significantly different between DCISM and the other two groups (DCIS: HR 0.59, CI 0.43-0.8; invasive: HR 1.43, CI 1.04-1.96). However, overall survival was not significantly different between DCISM and invasive disease, whereas patients with DCIS had improved OS (HR 0.83, CI 0.75-0.93). Although DCISM is a distinct entity, current treatment patterns and prognosis are comparable to those with small volume IDC. These findings may help providers counsel patients and determine appropriate treatment plans.

Ductal carcinoma in situ and ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: correlation of FDG uptake with histological and biological prognostic factors.

Several studies investigated the correlation between the intensity of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and some histological and biological characteristics in breast cancer. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is generally thought to be a precursor lesion of invasive breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between FDG uptake values on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with histological and biological prognostic factors in DCIS and ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS-Mi). PET/CT images for initial staging of confirmed DCIS and DCIS-Mi patients, taken between July 2004 and December 2009, were reviewed retrospectively. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and tumor background count density ratio on PET/CT were compared with tumor characteristics. Histological and biological prognostic factors included tumor size, nuclear grade, Van Nuys Prognostic Index, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, and Ki-67 index. In total, 87 lesions from 83 patients (all females; mean age 51±9years) were studied. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index group was 1 in 25 lesions, 2 in 36, and 3 in 26. On statistical analysis, significant differences in SUVmax and tumor background count density ratio were seen between the Van Nuys Prognostic Index groups and according to tumor size and HER2. The correlation between SUVmax and Ki-67 was significant. However, the correlation between tumor background count density ratio and Ki-67 was not statistically significant. In DCIS and DCIS-Mi cases, significant correlations were found between increased FDG uptake and several histological and biological factors for poor prognosis (tumor size, Van Nuys Prognostic Index, and HER2).

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Chinese experiences.

The axillary treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the roles of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with breast DCIS. A database containing the data from 262 patients diagnosed with breast DCIS and 100 patients diagnosed with DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) who received SLNB between January 2002 and July 2014 was retrospectively analyzed. Of the 262 patients with DCIS, 9 presented with SLN metastases (3 macrometastases and 6 micrometastases). Patients with large tumors diagnosed by ultrasound or with tumors of high histological grade had a higher positive rate of SLNs than those without (P=0.037 and P<0.0001, respectively). Of the 100 patients with DCISM, 11 presented with metastases. Younger patients had a higher positive rate of SLNs (P=0.028). According to the results of this study and the systematic review of recent studies, the indications of SLNB for patients with DCIS are as follows: SLNB should be performed in all DCISM patients and in those DCIS patients who received mastectomy, and could be avoided in those who received breast-conserving surgery. However, SLNB should be recommended to patients who have high risks of harboring invasive components. The risk factors include a large, palpable tumor, a mammographic mass or a high histological grade.

The sentinel lymph node procedure for patients with preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: risk factors for unsuspected invasive disease and for metastatic sentinel lymph nodes

Occult invasive disease could be found at definitive histology in patients initially diagnosed with large ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a reliable and minimally invasive procedure providing axillary information and avoiding a second operation in this particular group of patients. The aim of our study was to assess the value of SLN biopsy in patients with large DCIS who are at highest risk for being upstaged to invasive carcinoma. The study included 195 patients diagnosed with DCIS upon initial core biopsy and undergoing SLN biopsy. Many features were correlated with the presence of unsuspected invasive disease and positive SLN biopsy using univariate and multivariate analyses. Of the 110 patients with pure DCIS, seven patients (6%) had a metastatic lymph node; 31 patients (16%) were found to have invasive disease upon final histology. Univariate analysis of predictors of unsuspected invasive carcinoma showed that patients having a preoperative biopsy that indicated DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) or large DCIS were at a higher risk of invasive carcinoma after histological examination of the operative specimen. Of the 31 patients who were upstaged to invasive carcinoma at final histology, seven patients (22%) had a positive SLN biopsy. The analysis of predictors of positive SLN in our study shows that diffuse DCIS requiring mastectomy is the main risk factor for SLN metastasis. There are no real predictive factors for invasive disease in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM. Our study supports the value of SLN biopsy in patients with a preoperative DCISM biopsy or patients with a large pure DCIS biopsy requiring mastectomy.

Sentinel lymph node metastasis from mammary ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) of the breast was controversial, because of the relevant morbidity incurred by the procedure and the low incidence of axillary involvement. The introduction of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy as a minimally invasive procedure for axillary staging has prompted new interest in this issue. However, as DCISM is a rare type of cancer, data on the incidence of SLN metastasis are scarce. The aim of the present paper was therefore to assess the prevalence of SLN metastasis in a multi-institutional series of DCISM patients, in order to ascertain whether SLN biopsy might be justified as a standard procedure in the presence of microinvasive cancer. Between 1999 and 2004, 43 patients with a diagnosis of DCISM underwent SLN biopsy. Microinvasion was defined as one or more foci of invasion beyond the basal membrane, none exceeding 1mm. SLNs were examined following haematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining. SLN metastases were found in four out of 43 cases (9.3%). In one patient, SLN contained only micrometastasis. All four patients with positive SLN underwent complete ALND and in all these cases further metastatic axillary nodes were found. In conclusion, given the relevant incidence of nodal metastases and the low morbidity of the procedure, we believe that SLN biopsy should be considered in all patients with a diagnosis of DCISM. In cases of SLN involvement, even if micrometastatic, our policy is to perform a complete ALND.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Intraductal Carcinoma of the Breast with Microinvasion

Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is a separate clinical and pathological entity, distinct from pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), with a low but well-known metastatic potential. Due to the low rate of axillary metastases in DCISM, there is controversy regarding the indication for complete axillary dissection (CAD) to stage the axilla. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) could be routinely proposed to accurately stage the axilla avoiding the morbidity of a CAD. From March 1996 to December 2002, out of 4602 SLNBs performed for invasive carcinoma of the breast, 41 patients with DCISM in the definitive diagnosis were selected. Metastasis in the SLN were detected in 4 of 41 (9.7%) patients. Two of the 4 patients had only micrometastasis in the SLN. In three of these patients, the SLN was the only positive node after CAD. SLN biopsy should be considered as a standard procedure in DCISM patients. Complete AD may not be mandatory if only the SLN contains micrometastatic disease.

Sentinel lymph node metastasis in microinvasive breast cancer.

Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is a separate pathological entity, distinct from pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). DCISM is a true invasive breast carcinoma with a well-known metastatic potential. Currently, there is controversy regarding the indication for complete axillary dissection (CAD) to stage the axilla in patients with DCISM. The role of CAD is questioned given its morbidity and reported low incidence of axillary involvement. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may obviate the need for CAD in these patients without compromising the staging of the axilla and the important prognostic information. From March 1996 to December 2002, 4602 consecutive patients with invasive breast carcinoma underwent SLN biopsy. Of these, 41 patients with DCISM were selected. Metastasis in the SLN were detected in 4 of 41 (9.7%) patients. Two of the 4 patients had only micrometastasis in the SLN. In three patients, the SLN was the only positive node after CAD. SLN biopsy should be considered as a standard procedure in DCISM patients. SLNB can detect nodal micrometastasis and accurately stage the axilla avoiding the morbidity of a CAD. Complete AD may not be mandatory if only the SLN contains micrometastatic disease. Informed consent is very important in the decision not to undergo CAD.