Newborn Screening For Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Research Articles

Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A two-year pilot study.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked disorder resulting in progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, cardiomyopathy, and in late stages, cardiorespiratory impairment, and death. As treatments for DMD have expanded, a DMD newborn screening (NBS) pilot study was conducted in New York State to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of NBS for DMD and to provide an early pre-symptomatic diagnosis. At participating hospitals, newborns were recruited to the pilot study, and consent was obtained to screen the newborn for DMD. The first-tier screen measured creatine kinase-MM (CK-MM) in dried blood spot specimens submitted for routine NBS. Newborns with elevated CK-MM were referred for genetic counseling and genetic testing. The latter included deletion/duplication analysis and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the DMD gene followed by NGS for a panel of neuromuscular conditions if no pathogenic variants were detected in the DMD gene. In the two-year pilot study, 36,781 newborns were screened with CK-MM. Forty-two newborns (25 male and 17 female) were screen positive and referred for genetic testing. Deletions or duplications in the DMD gene were detected in four male infants consistent with DMD or Becker muscular dystrophy. One female DMD carrier was identified. This study demonstrated that the state NBS program infrastructure and screening technologies we used are feasible to perform NBS for DMD. With an increasing number of treatment options, the clinical utility of early identification for affected newborns and their families lends support for NBS for this severe disease.

Newborn Screening for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

A pilot newborn screening (NBS) program for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) study proposes to assess the feasibility of the screening procedure, temporal course of the various steps of screening, and the public acceptability of the program. This is particularly vital to ascertain as DMD is considered a 'non-treatable' disease and thus does not fit the traditional criteria for newborn screening. However, modern perspectives of NBS for DMD are changing and point to possible net benefits for children and their families undertaking NBS for DMD. The aim of this workshop was to establish pathways for the successful implementation and evaluation of a pilot NBS for DMD program in Australia. Consensus was reached as to the rationale for, potential benefits, risks, barriers and facilitators of screening, alongside the establishment of screening protocols and clinical referral pathways.

A pilot study of newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Guangzhou

BackgroundTo estimate the overall situation of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) screening in newborns in Guangzhou, China. MethodA total of 62553 newborns including 44268 males and 18285 females were screened for DMD by measuring muscle specific creatine kinase isoform (CK-MM) concentrations using the GSP® Neonatal CK-MM kit based on time-resolved immunofluorescence. We recalled positive cases and recollected dried blood spots (DBS) for retest of CK-MM. The newborns with retest positive result were recalled again for serum creatine kinase (CK) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) test. Whole exon sequencing was performed when MLPA test was negative. ResultsFour males were diagnosed with DMD. The incidence of males was 1/11067. No DMD patient was found in female. There were significant differences of CK-MM concentration between male and female newborns. Among gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW) and age at sampling, linear regression analysis showed that CK-MM concentration was much more closely correlated with GA and age at sampling. ConclusionsCK-MM concentration is affected by gender, GA, BW and age at sampling. The efficiency of DMD screening might be improved by adjusting a multitier cut-off value according to GA and age at sampling. DMD newborn screening should be male priority.

Implementation of Hospital-Based Supplemental Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening (sDMDNBS): A Pathway to Broadening Adoption.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is not currently part of mandatory newborn screening, despite the availability of a test since 1975. In the absence of screening, a DMD diagnosis is often not established in patients until 3–6 years of age. During this time, irreversible muscle degeneration takes place, and clinicians agree that the earlier therapy is initiated, the better the long-term outcome. With recent availability of FDA-approved DMD therapies, interest has renewed for adoption by state public health programs, but such implementation is a multiyear process. To speed access to approved therapies, we implemented a unique, hospital-based program offering parents of newborns an optional, supplemental DMD newborn screen (NBS) via a two-tiered approach: utilizing a creatine kinase (CK) enzyme assay coupled with rapid targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for the DMD gene (using a Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) assay). The tNGS/WES assay integrates the ability to detect both point mutations and large deletion/duplication events. This tiered newborn screening approach allows for the opportunity to improve treatment and outcomes, avoid the diagnostic delays, and diminish healthcare disparities. To implement this screening algorithm through hospitals in a way that would ultimately be acceptable to public health laboratories, we chose an FDA-approved CK-MM immunoassay to avoid the risks of false-negative/-positive results. Because newborn CK values can be affected due to non-DMD-related causes such as birth trauma, a confirmatory repeat CK assay on a later dried blood spot (DBS) collection has been proposed. Difficulties associated with non-routine repeat DBS collection, including the tracking and recall of families, and the potential creation of parental anxiety associated with false-positive results, can be avoided with this algorithm. Whereas a DMD diagnosis is essentially ruled out by the absence of detected DMD sequence abnormalities, a subsequent CK would still be warranted to confirm resolution of the initial elevation, and thus the absence of non-DMD muscular dystrophy or other pathologies. To date, we have screened over 1500 newborns (uptake rate of ~80%) by a CK-MM assay, and reflexed DMD tNGS in 29 of those babies. We expect the experience from this screening effort will serve as a model that will allow further expansion to other hospital systems until a universal public health screening is established.

Progress in treatment and newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy.

Advances in treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) hold promise for children with these disorders. Accurate genetic diagnosis, early in the disease process, will allow these treatments to be most effective. Newborn screening (NBS) for SMA has been recommended in the United States, and a pilot DMD NBS program is underway in Hangzhou, China. A PubMed search, limited to the past 5years, was conducted to identify: (1) therapeutic advancements for DMD/SMA approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicine Agency and (2) The status of NBS for DMD/SMA. We review the current state of approved treatments for DMD/SMA. We present recommendations regarding the future of NBS for these diseases, with a focus on the outcomes and challenges of SMA NBS in New York, USA, and the DMD NBS pilot program in Hangzhou, China. Approved treatments for DMD and SMA may change the natural history of these diseases. Long-term studies of these treatments are underway. To avoid the known diagnostic delay associated with these disorders and provide optimal effectiveness of these treatments, early identification of patients through NBS will be necessary. Establishing comprehensive follow-up plans for positively identified patients will need to be in place for NBS programs to be successful.

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening, a Case Study for Examining Ethical and Legal Issues for Pilots for Emerging Disorders: Considerations and Recommendations.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD/Duchenne) is one of the ten most severe and common pediatric genetic diseases and affects an estimated 1 in every 5000 male births. While Duchenne is a 100% fatal disease, the clinical community has demonstrated that immediate identification and early clinical interventions can add years, even decades to an individual’s life span. In anticipation of the changing therapeutic landscape for the Duchenne community, Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy established a newborn screening (NBS) initiative. This initiative included a Bioethics and Legal Issues Workgroup to consider the bioethics and legal issues of NBS for Duchenne. The workgroup’s discussion focused only on Duchenne NBS and met through conference calls over a one-year period of time seeking consensus on various identified issues. This article reports on the findings and recommendations from that workgroup.

Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy in China: follow-up diagnosis and subsequent treatment.

Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is currently being initiated in Zhejiang Province, China and is under consideration in other countries, including the United States. As China begins to implement DMD newborn screening (DMD-NBS), there is ongoing discussion regarding the steps forward for follow up care of positively identified patients as well as false positive and false negative results. Relevant papers related to DMD-NBS, and NBS in China were reviewed in PubMed. The current state of DMD-NBS is discussed, along with the steps needed to effectively screen infants for this disease in China, recommendations for establishment of follow up care in patients with positive and negative screens, and measurement of patient outcomes. Zhejiang Province, China is ready to implement DMD-NBS. Future challenges that exist for this program, and other countries, include the ability to track patients, assist with access to care, and ensure adequate follow-up care according to evidence-based guidelines. In addition, China's large rural population, lack of specialty providers, and difficulty in educating patients regarding the benefits of treatment create challenges that will need to be addressed.

A Roadmap to Newborn Screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common childhood form of muscular dystrophy, with an estimated frequency of 1:5000 live births. The impact of the disease presents as early as infancy with significant developmental delays, and ultimately loss of ambulation and respiratory insufficiency. Glucocorticoids are the only pharmacological agents known to alter the natural progression of the disease by prolonging ambulation, reducing scoliosis, and assisted ventilation. Introduction of therapy at an early age may halt the muscle pathology in DMD. In anticipation of the potentially disease-modifying products that are reaching regulatory review, Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy (PPMD) formally initiated a national Duchenne Newborn Screening (DNBS) effort in December 2014 to build public health infrastructure for newborn screening (NBS) for Duchenne in the United States. The effort includes a formalized national Duchenne Newborn Screening Steering Committee, six related Working Groups, a Duchenne Screening Test Development Project led by PerkinElmer, a program with the American College of Medical Genetic and Genomics’ Newborn Screening Translation Research Network (NBSTRN), and collaborations with other Duchenne partners and federal agencies involved in NBS. We herein review the organization and effort of the U.S. DNBS program to develop the evidence supporting the implementation of NBS for DMD.

Clinical Follow-Up for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening: A Proposal.

New developments in the rapid diagnosis and treatment of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) have led to growing enthusiasm for instituting DMD newborn screening (NBS) in the United States. Our group has been interested in developing clinical guidance to be implemented consistently in specialty care clinics charged with the care of presymptomatically identified newborns referred after DMD-NBS. We reviewed the existing literature covering patient-centered clinical follow-up after NBS, educational material from public health and advocacy sites, and federal recommendations on effective NBS follow-up. We discussed the review as a group and added our own experience to develop materials suitable for initial parent and primary care provider education. These materials and a series of templates for subspecialist encounters could be used to provide consistent care across centers and serve as the basis for ongoing quality improvement. Muscle Nerve 54: 186-191, 2016.

Identifying Non-Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy-Positive and False Negative Results in Prior Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening Programs: A Review.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a candidate for the recommended universal screening panel based on evidence that early corticosteroid treatment improves outcomes and on new genetic therapies that require early diagnosis for effectiveness. Elevated creatine kinase levels in the neonatal period are the initial screening marker in DMD newborn screening programs but is found in inherited muscle disorders other than DMD. Data are needed to inform protocols for future screening and follow-up testing and care in these patients. To review non-DMD muscle disorders identified by prior DMD screening programs and to investigate whether these programs failed to identify patients later diagnosed as having DMD (false-negative findings). Since 1975, 10 DMD newborn screening programs have provided opportunities to study screening protocols, outcomes, and parental responses. These programs used elevated creatine kinase levels in dried blood spots for the initial screening, with the diagnosis of DMD based on findings of clinical follow-up, muscle biopsy, or direct mutational testing of the DMD gene. Literature regarding these prior programs was reviewed in PubMed, and the programs were discussed directly with the directors when possible to identify diagnoses of non-DMD disorders and false negative results from 1975 to July 12, 2015. Data were collected from screening programs, which were active between 1975 and December 2011. Data were analyzed from March 26, 2015, to August 24, 2015. The 10 screening programs screened more than 1.8 million newborns between 1975 and 2011, and 344 were diagnosed with DMD. Of those screened, the majority were boys. Across all programs, 80 patients had positive results for non-DMD disorders, including Becker muscular dystrophy and forms of limb-girdle and congenital muscular dystrophies, and 21 patients had false-negative findings for DMD. Screening for DMD will result in identification of other muscle diseases. Future screening protocols should include infants of both sexes and include follow-up testing algorithms to evaluate patients who do not have DMD gene mutations but may have another muscle disorder associated with elevated neonatal creatine kinase levels. These programs will need to be aware that false-negative results are a possibility.

Twenty-year follow-up of newborn screening for patients with muscular dystrophy.

An opt-out newborn screening (NBS) program for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) was implemented at 2 hospitals in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, between 1987 and 1995. For patients and their parents in families who received a diagnosis of DMD or BMD, either by NBS or by traditional diagnostics after symptom onset, attitudes toward NBS for DMD and BMD were assessed. All patients and most parents supported NBS for DMD and BMD. In contrast to the NBS parent cohort, the non-NBS cohort felt that diagnosis by NBS would cause anxiety. There was strong support of NBS for DMD and BMD in both patients and their parents in families who received a diagnosis through NBS or through traditional diagnostics. No negative psychosocial impacts of NBS were identified among those families who received a diagnosis through NBS.

Cystic fibrosis newborn screening: a model for neuromuscular disease screening?

Congenital neuromuscular disorders, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and Pompe disease (acid maltase deficiency [AMD]), are candidates for universal newborn screening (NBS). In this article, we discuss the future path of NBS for these disorders with particular emphasis on DMD NBS, because of the likely approval of new gene-modifying treatments, the possible benefits of earlier treatment with corticosteroids, and the recently demonstrated feasibility of a 2-tiered approach to NBS with screening by creatine kinase (CK) levels in dried blood spots followed by mutation detection in those with elevated CK. The cystic fibrosis (CF) NBS program is a successful model for NBS. CF outcomes have consistently improved into adulthood following introduction of CF NBS because considerable resources have been devoted to practices that include: attention to improving laboratory screening, consistent confirmatory testing and immediate referral of all newly diagnosed infants to designated CF care centers that follow established practice guidelines, and ongoing evaluation of CF care centers via a centralized clinical database. Like CF, DMD, SMA, and infantile AMD are inexorably debilitating and require lifetime multidisciplinary clinical management. NBS would address the delays in diagnosis that prevent patients from receiving timely treatments. Standardized care following early diagnosis would reduce disparities in clinical care and outcomes. NBS in these neuromuscular disorders should be implemented, utilizing lessons learned from the past 20 years of CF NBS: standardized protocols for all patients identified by DMD NBS, longitudinal follow-up in multidisciplinary clinics, and coordinated oversight of these clinics.

Parental attitudes toward newborn screening for Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy

Disease inclusion in the newborn screening (NBS) panel should consider the opinions of those most affected by the outcome of screening. We assessed the level and factors that affect parent attitudes regarding NBS panel inclusion of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The attitudes toward NBS for DMD, BMD, and SMA were surveyed and compared for 2 categories of parents, those with children affected with DMD, BMD, or SMA and expectant parents unselected for known family medical history. The level of support for NBS for DMD, BMD, and SMA was 95.9% among parents of children with DMD, BMD, or SMA and 92.6% among expectant parents. There was strong support for NBS for DMD, BMD, and SMA in both groups of parents. Given advances in diagnostics and promising therapeutic approaches, discussion of inclusion in NBS should continue.

D.O.1 A two-tiered approach to newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) using dried blood spots for sequential CK and DNA analysis

Historically, newborn screening for DMD has been challenging in part due to elevations in serum CK related to birth trauma, resulting in false-positive results when used as a screening test. Nevertheless, the rationale for newborn screening is supported by several lines of argument. One is that new techniques for molecular diagnostics hold promise for improved rapid mutational analysis from small amounts of starting material. Another is that new potential therapeutics are entering clinical trials, and these or future therapies may significantly impact disease course if offered in infancy. A complementary argument regards clinical trial readiness; studies addressing efficacy in children of this age cannot be performed if a reliable method of early detection is unavailable. We have established and validated a two-tier system of screening and molecular diagnosis that uses a dried blood spot obtained within the first 48h to first assess CK via a fluorometric assay as the first step. Preliminary studies established a population-based range of CK in newborns using 30,547 deidentified anonymous dried blood spot samples. Mutation analysis used genomic DNA extracted from the dried blood spot for whole genome amplification followed by MLPA and/or direct sequencing methods. DMD gene mutations (all exonic deletions) were found in 6 of 37,649 newborn males, all of whom had CK levels >2000U/l. In three newborns with CK >2000U/l in whom DMD gene abnormalities were not found, we identified limb-girdle muscular dystrophy gene mutations affecting the DYSF, SGCB, and FKRP genes. This data is currently in press elsewhere, but here we will review this path for screening that fits the US health care system, minimizes false-positive testing, and uses predetermined levels of CK on dried blood spots to predict DMD gene mutations, and we will discuss prospects and challenges for widespread utilization.

Screening for conditions that do not meet the Wilson and Jungner criteria: The case of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

In this manuscript, I examine four overlapping policy and ethical issues regarding screening newborns (and infants) for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). First, what are the risks and benefits of expanding newborn screening (NBS) to include DMD? Second, if NBS were to expand to include DMD, should it require informed consent? Third, should NBS for DMD be limited to boys? Why or why not? Fourth, when is the ideal timing for screening (prenatal, newborn, or later in infancy) and what factors influence this determination? I argue that decisions about when, how, and whom to test reflect a tension between maximizing uptake and diagnosis versus maximizing autonomy and choice with respect to genetic information. I conclude that screening for DMD is a valid moral option, but not as part of the mandatory NBS population program. Rather, I propose that screening for DMD should be offered only on a voluntary basis beyond the newborn period. I support offering this screening to families of young boys and girls to ensure that all children and their families can benefit from early diagnosis and its reproductive implications. A rigorous consent process will be necessary to ensure that the decision whether or not to test is a voluntary and informed choice.