Dual Therapy Group Research Articles

Regorafenib Combination Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: With or Without Transarterial Chemoembolization.

The effectiveness and tolerability of triple therapy, which combines regorafenib, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), were compared to dual therapy consisting of regorafenib and a PD-1 inhibitor in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with advanced HCC who underwent second-line therapy from March 2019 to June 2022 at multiple centers. Patients were stratified into two groups: dual therapy (comprising regorafenib and a PD-1 inhibitor) and triple therapy (consisting of regorafenib, a PD-1 inhibitor, and TACE). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for potential confounding variables. After PSM, 112 eligible patients were included, with 56 in the triple therapy group and 56 in the dual therapy group. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the triple therapy group (15.4 vs. 8.9 months, p < 0.001), as was median progression-free survival (PFS) (6.8 vs. 3.3 months, p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) (37.5% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.001) and disease control rate (DCR) (73.2% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the triple therapy group compared to the dual therapy group. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between the two groups. Triple therapy demonstrated superior survival benefits compared to dual therapy in patients with advanced HCC. Additionally, the safety profiles of the two treatment regimens were comparable.

The effect of adding pancreatin to standard otilinium bromide and simethicone treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

This study aimed to assess the impact of adding pancreatin (a pancreatic enzyme derivative) to standard treatment on patients diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). IBS and T2DM frequently coexist, leading to significant gastrointestinal symptoms and a decrease in quality of life. Gastrointestinal symptoms arising in T2DM patients present challenges in management for both clinicians and patients. Standard treatments may not fully address these symptoms. Recent studies suggest that pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy may offer additional benefits. This study investigates whether adding pancreatin to standard treatment can improve gastrointestinal outcomes in this patient population. Conducted as a prospective observational study, the research involved patients diagnosed with IBS according to Rome IV criteria and having concomitant T2DM. The patients were divided into two groups: one receiving standard dual treatment (otilinium bromide + simethicone) and the other receiving a triple therapy including a pancreatin derivative in addition to the standard treatment. Various clinical scores and measurements, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Bristol Stool Chart (BSC), Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS), and Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Instrument (IBS-QOL), were assessed before and after treatment. The study comprised 121 patients, with a median age of 41 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38-48), of whom approximately 70.2% were female. Fifty-eight patients (47.9%) received dual therapy, while sixty-three patients (52.1%) received triple therapy. Before treatment, both groups exhibited similar pre-treatment Bristol stool scale results: normal (39.7% and 49.2%) and constipation (37.9% and 31.7%) in the dual and triple therapy subgroups, respectively (p > 0.05). Post-treatment, the triple therapy group showed a significantly higher proportion of normal cases on the Bristol stool scale (82.5%) compared to the dual therapy group (44.8%) (p < 0.001). After treatment, the triple therapy group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in VAS score (p < 0.001), IBS-SSS (p < 0.001), and IBS-QOL (p < 0.001) compared to the dual therapy group. There were no significant differences between groups in BMI, HbA1c levels, duration of diabetes, or diabetes treatment at baseline (p > 0.05 for all parameters). The findings suggest that adding pancreatin to standard therapies significantly enhanced the quality of life for patients with both IBS and T2DM, demonstrating improvements across various symptom measurements and indicating the potential benefits of this supplementary therapy in managing gastrointestinal symptoms in this population. Further studies are warranted to explore its broader clinical implications and mechanisms of action.

Eradication rate and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized controlled trial

Background Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), prevalent in developing regions, is a key factor in gastrointestinal diseases. Despite the common use of bismuth-based quadruple therapy, its drawbacks have prompted the search for alternatives. Recently, vonoprazan, a novel acid suppressant, has shown promise in combination with antibiotics as a dual therapy for H. pylori eradication. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic outcomes and adverse events of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy compared to quadruple therapy. Methods A randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled H. pylori-infected patients at Zhejiang Hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to dual and quadruple therapy groups. The primary endpoints were H. pylori eradication and adverse events. Results Of the 400 patients studied from April 2022 to June 2023, In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the eradication rates of H. pylori in vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy group and quadruple therapy group were 94.0% and 87.0%, respectively, p = 0.017. In the per-protocol (PP) analysis were 97.9% and 93.0%, p = 0.022. Additionally, the dual therapy group had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events (19%) compared to the quadruple therapy group (53%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy demonstrates superior eradication efficacy and reduced adverse events compared to quadruple therapy in H. pylori-infected patients, suggesting its potential for clinical application and promotion.

Early dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis

ObjectivesMinor stroke is defined by a score of 5 or less on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Prior trials have shown efficacy of short term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke, but no randomized clinical trials have studied this benefit after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Our aim was to investigate the safety of DAPT within 90 days after IVT in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke. Patients and methodsWe reviewed medical records of patients older than 18 years that received IVT between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients had a diagnosis of acute minor stroke or averted stroke (complete recovery and negative image on follow-up). Single or dual antiplatelet treatment was started 24 hours after thrombolysis according to the physician's judgment. Patients were divided in two groups: single and dual antiplatelet therapy. We assessed clinical outcome using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality at 90 days. ResultsFifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, 68% men aged 64±16,5 years. Seventy five percent had an ischemic stroke and 25% had an averted stroke. Median door-to-needle time was 50 minutes. Fifty one percent were in the single antiplatelet group and 49% in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. There were no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. The 90-day mRS did not show significant difference between groups. No patients had SICH nor died during follow-up. One patient in the single antiplatelet group had stroke recurrence. ConclusionsDual antiplatelet therapy after IVT with rtPA for acute minor ischemic stroke appears not to increase the risk of bleeding and mortality compared to single antiplatelet therapy in the first three months after the event. This is the first study to assess this subject in a Latin American population.

Rivaroxaban and Aspirin in Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundAfter drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment of the femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR), a certain proportion of patients also experience target lesion restenosis. The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin in the treatment of ISR after DCB intervention. MethodsPatients who underwent DCB treatment for ISR after femoropopliteal artery intervention at our center from March 2017 to February 2022 were included consecutively. According to the drug treatment after DCB intervention of ISR, the patients were divided into rivaroxaban and aspirin group (RA Group) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group. The outcomes of two groups during the 12-month follow-up after DCB intervention were compared. ResultsA total of 92 patients were included in final analysis, with 43 in RA group and 49 in DAPT group. During 12-month follow-up, a total of 15 cases of recurrent ISR were detected, and the recurrence rate of ISR and clinically driven TLR in the RA group were lower than those in the DAPT group (P<0.05). The vascular patency rate in the RA group was higher than that in the DAPT group at 6 and 12 months of follow-up (P<0.05). During the follow-up, there were no adverse events such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, amputation, or major bleeding, and only a total of 5 cases of minor bleeding occurred. ConclusionCompared with the standard DAPT regimen, rivaroxaban combined with aspirin can safely improve the follow-up outcome after DCB for femoropopliteal ISR.

Hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with high-risk: A propensity score matching study.

To ascertain the therapeutic efficacy and safety of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin)-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors (PD-1 inhibitors) (triple therapy), as a first-line treatment in high-risk advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC with Vp4 portal vein invasion or/and tumor diameter ≥ 10cm). This retrospective multicenter study included 466 high-risk aHCC patients treated with either triple therapy (n = 245) or dual therapy (TKI and PD-1 inhibitors, n = 221). The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias between the two groups. After PSM (1:1), 194 patients in each group were analyzed. The triple-therapy group showed a longer median OS (24.6 months vs. 11.9 months; HR = 0.43, P < 0.001) and a longer median PFS (10.0 months vs. 7.7 months; HR = 0.68, P = 0.002) than the dual-therapy group. The survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 94.2%, 71.0%, and 50.8% for triple therapy and 75.9%, 49.9%, and 26.8% for dual therapy. The ORR in the triple-therapy group was significantly higher (57.7% vs. 28.9%, P < 0.001). In the triple-therapy group, more patients converted to non-high-risk (68.0% vs. 36.6%, P < 0.001) and received salvage liver resection or ablation after downstaging conversion (16.5% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.033). The grade 3/4 adverse events were 59.2% and 47.4% in the triple-therapy group and dual-therapy group, respectively (P = 0.022). FOLFOX-based HAIC plus TKI and PD-1 inhibitors significantly improve survival prognosis compared with TKI plus PD-1 inhibitors. This is a potential first-line treatment for high-risk aHCC, with a relatively controlled safety profile.

Preclinical Direct Endoluminal Assessment of Endothelialization After Flow Diversion With Microangioscopy

Background Direct endoluminal imaging, such as with our previously described microangioscope, is an emerging adjunct in endovascular cerebral aneurysm management that enables clinicians to delineate between thrombi and visualize neoepithelialization after stent placement with high resolution. The present study sought to study flow diversion in vivo under direct endoluminal imaging, and to validate our findings with histopathology. Methods In a rabbit model, we implanted each left common carotid artery with a shielded flow diverter (FD) (Medtronic Pipeline Vantage) and nonshielded FD (Medtronic Pipeline Flex) in the right common carotid artery. We studied 9 animals in 3 groups: (1) no periprocedural antiplatelet therapy, (2) aspirin 81 mg daily, and (3) aspirin 81 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg daily. FD thrombosis, stenosis, malapposition, and neoepithelialization were all evaluated by diagnostic cerebral angiography and microangioscopy after 30 days. Diagnostic cerebral angiography and angioscopic video were analyzed by independent evaluators and compared with histopathologic analysis. Results In the aspirin and dual antiplatelet therapy groups, there were no significant observed differences in stent thrombosis, stenosis, malapposition, or neoepithelialization between the shielded and non‐shielded FD groups. There was significantly more thrombus formation in Group 1. Neointimal thickness as measured by the microangioscope was highly correlated with histology (r = 0.72; P = 0.016). Interrater agreement of microangioscope videos was highest for FD thrombosis and stenosis. Conclusion In‐stent thrombosis, stenosis, malapposition, and neopithelialization demonstrated no significant difference between shielded and non‐shielded FDs. Microangioscopy measurements for neointimal thickness were highly correlated with pathology and may be a helpful adjunct to diagnostic cerebral angiography in FD follow‐up.

Risk Factors, Antithrombotic Management, and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Patients receiving endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) face varying risks and benefits with antithrombotic management. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and long-term effects of antithrombotic strategies, identify the populations that would benefit, and explore the predictive factors affecting the long-term outcomes. UIA patients undergoing endovascular treatment including stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion between June 2019 and June 2022 were enrolled. We compared perioperative and long-term complications between tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy groups. Optimal candidates for each antithrombotic treatment were identified using multivariate logistic regression. Nomograms were developed to determine the significant predictors for thromboembolic complications during follow-up. Among 181 propensity-score matched pairs, the tirofiban group showed a trend toward a lower rate of thromboembolic complications than the DAPT group without elevating major bleeding risk in either period. Homocysteine (Hcy) level ≥10 μmol/L was a significant independent factor associated with thromboembolic complication in both periods. Subgroup analysis highlighted that in patients with high Hcy levels, tirofiban and sustained antiplatelet treatment for ≥12 months were protective factors, while a history of stroke was an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events in follow-up. Four variables were selected to construct a prognostic nomogram, history of hypertension, prior stroke, Hcy level, and the duration of antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative low-dose tirofiban and extended antiplatelet therapy demonstrated a favorable trend in long-term outcomes for UIA patients with preoperative Hcy levels ≥10 μmol/L undergoing endovascular treatment. The prognostic model offers reliable risk prediction and guides antithrombotic strategy decisions.

Optimal antiplatelet therapy after revascularization of left subclavian artery during TEVAR

BackgroundThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive technique used to treat type B aortic dissections. Left subclavian artery (LSA) reconstruction is required when treating patients with involvement of LSA. The best antiplatelet therapy after LSA reconstruction is presently uncertain.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 245 type B aortic dissection patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularization during TEVAR. Out of 245 patients, 159 (64.9%) were in the single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) group, receiving only aspirin, and 86 (35.1%) were in the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group, receiving aspirin combined with clopidogrel. During the 6-month follow-up, primary endpoints included hemorrhagic events (general bleeding and hemorrhagic strokes), while secondary endpoints comprised ischemic events (left upper limb ischemia, ischemic stroke, and thrombotic events), as well as death and leakage events. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on hemorrhagic and ischemic events, with the Kaplan-Meier method used to generate the survival curve.ResultsDuring the six-month follow-up, the incidence of hemorrhagic events in the DAPT group was higher (8.2% vs. 30.2%, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in ischemic events, death, or leakage events among the different antiplatelet treatment schemes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that DAPT (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07–4.60, P = 0.032) and previous chronic conditions (HR:3.88, 95% CI: 1.24–12.14, P = 0.020) significantly affected the occurrence of hemorrhagic events. Chronic conditions in this study encompassed depression, vitiligo, and cholecystolithiasis. Carotid subclavian bypass (CSB) group (HR:0.29, 95% CI: 0.12–0.68, P = 0.004) and single-branched stent graft (SBSG) group (HR:0.26, 95% CI: 0.13–0.50, P < 0.001) had a lower rate of ischemic events than fenestration TEVAR (F-TEVAR). Survival analysis over 6 months revealed a lower risk of bleeding associated with SAPT during hemorrhagic events (P = 0.043).ConclusionsIn type B aortic dissection patients undergoing LSA blood flow reconstruction after synchronous TEVAR, the bleeding risk significantly decreases with the SAPT regimen, and there is no apparent ischemic compensation within 6 months. Patients with previous chronic conditions have a higher risk of bleeding. The CSB group and SBSG group have less ischemic risk compared to F-TEVAR group.

Antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery: five year follow-up of randomised DACAB trial

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of different antiplatelet strategies on clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.DesignFive year follow-up of randomised Different Antiplatelet Therapy Strategy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (DACAB)...

Dual Antithrombotic Therapy versus Anticoagulant Monotherapy for Major Adverse Limb Events in Patients with Concomitant Lower Extremity Arterial Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Score Weighted Analysis

Patients with symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) are recommended to receive antiplatelet therapy, while direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are standard for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For patients with concomitant LEAD and AF, data comparing dual antithrombotic therapy (an antiplatelet agent used in conjunction with a DOAC) vs. DOAC monotherapy are scarce. This retrospective cohort study, based on data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these antithrombotic strategies. Patients with AF who underwent revascularisation for LEAD between 2012 - 2020 and received any DOAC within 30 days of discharge were included. Patients were grouped by antiplatelet agent exposure into the dual antithrombotic therapy and DOAC monotherapy groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to mitigate selection bias. Major adverse limb events (MALEs), ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism, and bleeding outcomes were compared. Patients were followed until the occurrence of any study outcome, death, or up to two years. A total of 1 470 patients were identified, with 736 in the dual antithrombotic therapy group and 734 in the DOAC monotherapy group. Among them, 1 346 patients received endovascular therapy as the index revascularisation procedure and 124 underwent bypass surgery. At two years, dual antithrombotic therapy was associated with a higher risk of MALEs than DOAC monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 - 1.56), primarily driven by increased repeat revascularisation. Dual antithrombotic therapy was also associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.94) and gastrointestinal bleeding (SHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.42 - 3.33) than DOAC monotherapy. In patients with concomitant LEAD and AF who underwent peripheral revascularisation, DOAC monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of MALEs and bleeding events than dual antithrombotic therapy.

Interventional therapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors as initial treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundInterventional therapy, in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has shown promising outcomes for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). With the advent of immunotherapy, the combined use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has attracted great attention due to their potential effectiveness in advanced HCC. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy regimen (Interventional therapy, TKIs and ICIs, IT-TKI-ICI) with a dual therapy regimen (Interventional therapy and TKIs, IT-TKI) in the treatment of HCC and PVTT (HCC-PVTT).MethodsA comprehensive search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases. Primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included tumor response rate, adverse event incidence as well as downstaging surgery rate. Statistical analysis was conducted using Revman 5.4 software.ResultsThe meta-analysis finally included 6 cohort studies. The triple therapy group demonstrated significantly prolonged OS and PFS compared to the dual therapy group. Meanwhile, the former exhibited significantly higher rates of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and better downstaging effects with a higher salvage surgery rate without significantly increasing adverse events.ConclusionIn comparison to dual therapy, the triple therapy with interventional therapy, TKIs, and ICIs demonstrates superior efficacy and equivalent safety for HCC-PVTT.

The impact of various antiplatelet strategies on the incidence of gouty arthritis in hospitalized patients with acute cerebral infarction

Objectives1.To explore the incidence of concurrent gouty arthritis (GA) during hospitalization in patients with different subtypes of acute stroke.2.To investigate disparities in acute cerebral infarction patients with coexisting GA undergoing various antiplatelet strategies. Materials and methodsData from acute stroke patients admitted to the Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, from January 2019 to December 2021, underwent screening. The incidence of GA in acute stroke patients of various subtypes were analyzed. Subsequently, we divided cerebral infarction cases into three cohorts based on distinct antiplatelet therapies: the aspirin group, the dual antiplatelet therapy group (DAPT，aspirin plus clopidogrel), and the clopidogrel group. Investigate disparities in acute cerebral infarction patients with coexisting GA undergoing various antiplatelet strategies. ResultsA total of 12,381 patients with acute stroke were screened in this study. The incidence of GA in various subtypes of acute stroke was as follows: cerebral infarction (3.56 %, n = 9890), TIA (1.81 %, n = 443), cerebral hemorrhag (0.64 %, n = 1713), and SAH (0.30 %, n = 335). The incidence of GA in patients with ischemic stroke is higher than that of hemorrhagic stroke (χ2 = 49.258, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of GA among three different antiplatelet therapy groups. But there was marginal statistical difference in the incidence of GA between the aspirin group and the DAPT group (P = 0.051), as well as between the clopidogrel group and the DAPT group (P = 0.059). ConclusionsThe incidence of GA in patients with ischemic stroke is higher than that of hemorrhagic stroke. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of GA in acute cerebral infarction across various antiplatelet Strategies. The marginal statistical difference in the incidence of GA between the single antiplatelet group and the DAPT group requires further investigation.

P2Y12 monotherapy versus standard dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the recommended therapy for lowering the ischemic risk among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the increased incidence of bleeding is a major concern. Monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor after short-term DAPT to reduce adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding rates has not been fully established and remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to determine the effectiveness of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term DAPT in reducing cardiovascular and bleeding events. Methods A comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the use of short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy in patients with ACS who underwent PCI was conducted. Outcome measures for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and bleeding rates were analyzed using a random-effects model via Review Manager V5.4. Results A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 36,724 subjects were analyzed. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.78-1.02], I² = 0%, p = 0.10) and myocardial infarction (RR 1.00 [95% CI: 0.88-1.14], I² = 0%, p = 0.72) between the P2Y12 inhibitor group and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group. There was a lower rate of major bleeding in the P2Y12 group compared to the DAPT group (RR 0.65 [95% CI: 0.49-0.88], I² = 76%, p = 0.002). The major sources of substantial heterogeneity are due to different intervals of de-escalation and baseline risk factors prior to PCI in each study. Conclusion P2Y12 monotherapy has similar rates of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. However, early de-escalation leads to a lower incidence of bleeding. P2Y12 monotherapy showed a 35% decreased risk of bleeding compared to the DAPT strategy. This suggests that P2Y12 monotherapy is a preferable antiplatelet strategy in patients undergoing PCI, especially in the high-risk bleeding population.

DOSE-RESPONSE EFFECT OF SODIUM REDUCTION ON BLOOD PRSSURE IN TREATED HYPERTENSIVES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE META-ANALYSIS

Objective: To evaluate the dose-response effects of a reduction in dietary sodium intake on blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive individuals who were on antihypertensive treatments. The impact of antihypertensive-drug class was also examined. Design and method: We searched Medline (via Ovid), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and reference lists of relevant articles up to 12 November 2023. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect on BP between different levels of dietary sodium intake in adults who were diagnosed as primary hypertension and treated with constant antihypertensive medications during the study period. We excluded RCTs with duration &lt; 2 weeks. Dietary sodium intake was measured using 24-hour urinary sodium excretion. Instrumental variable meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the dose-response effects of sodium reduction on BP. Subgroup analysis and multivariate meta-regression analysis were performed to examine the impact of antihypertensive-drug class. Results: 35 studies with 2885 participants were included. The pooled estimates of mean reduction in 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were 68.74 (95% confidence interval: 62.30-75.19) mmol, 4.33 (3.37-5.29) mmHg, 2.60 mm Hg (2.04-3.17), and 3.19 (2.50-3.87), respectively. For every 100 mmol reduction in 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, SBP, DBP, and MAP decreased by 6.81 (4.96-8.66) mmHg, 3.85 (2.26-5.43) mmHg, and 4.83 (3.22-6.44) mmHg, respectively (Fig 1). The observed dose-response effects differed across class of antihypertensive medication (P-diff = 0.084 for SBP, and P-diff&lt;0.05 for DBP and MAP). In Beta-blockers, Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) inhibitors, and dual therapy groups, significant dose-response effects of sodium on SBP, DBP and MAP were observed. In Calcium Chanel Blockers (CCB) group, the dose-response relationship was only found for SBP. No dose-response effect on BP was observed in diuretics monotherapy group. Conclusions: Pooled evidence of RCTs suggests a dose-response relationship between sodium reduction and BP in treated hypertensives, which is impacted by class of antihypertensive medications.

Synergism of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and OnabotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine: A Real-World Retrospective Chart Review.

Many patients with chronic migraine do not achieve clinically meaningful improvement in their headache frequency with monotherapy. The burden associated with chronic migraine calls for a multifaceted treatment approach targeting multiple aspects of migraine pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of concurrent anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onabot) treatment on median monthly migraine days (MMD) in patients with chronic migraine, through a retrospective study. The electronic medical records of Cleveland Clinic patients either concurrently (dual therapy) or consecutively (monotherapy) treated with anti-CGRP mAbs and onabot between June 2018 and November 2021 were extracted. Only adult patients (≥ 18years of age) were included in this study. MMDs for 194 concurrently treated (86.6% female and a median [interquartile range] age of 51 [41-61] years) and 229 consecutively treated (88.2% female and median age of 47 [IQR 39-57] years) patients were examined at baseline, after first therapy of either anti-CGRP mAb or onabot, and following dual therapy for 3 consecutive months. The reduction of MMDs for each treatment group were compared. The same approach was utilized to compare consecutive monotherapy at separate times (n = 229) and dual-therapy groups. The initial treatment of the dual-therapy group reduced the median (IQR) MMDs from 30 (30-30) to 15 (12-30) [p < 0.0001]. After initiation of dual therapy, the median MMDs was further decreased from 15 (12-30) to 8 (3-22) [p < 0.0001]. A majority [132/194 (68.0%)] of the dual-therapy patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MMD and 90/194 (46.4%) reported a ≥ 75% reduction. For the consecutive monotherapy group, median MMDs changed from a baseline of 30 (25-30) to 15 (8-25) from onabot monotherapy and decreased from 25 (15-30) to 12 (4-25) after anti-CGRP mAb monotherapy. Almost half (113/229 [49.3%] from onabot, and 104/229 [45.4%] from anti-CGRP mAb) of these patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs and a minority (38/229 [16.6%] from onabot, and 45/229 [19.7%] from anti-CGRP mAb) achieved a reduction of ≥ 75%. Additionally, dual therapy showed significant improvement in MMDs compared with monotherapy of either treatment (p < 0.0001). Dual therapy of anti-CGRP mAbs and onabot may be more efficacious than monotherapy, possibly due to their synergistic mechanisms of action.

Assessment of Aspirin and Clopidogrel Resistance in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study

We aimed to investigate antiplatelet drug resistance utilizing light transmission-lumiaggregometry (LT-LA) and the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. The study included 60 patients diagnosed with stable coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular diseases that required surgery. Participants were divided into three groups: patients receiving aspirin (ASA) (n=21), patients receiving clopidogrel (CLO) (n=19), and patients receiving dual therapy (ASA+CLO) (n=20). Aggregation and secretion tests by LT-LA and closure time by the PFA-100 were used to measure antiplatelet drug resistance. Based on the adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation test, 43% of patients were resistant to ASA, 22% to CLO, and 15% to dual therapy. Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were the most commonly identified comorbid disorders. In patients with comorbid risk factors, the median value of platelet aggregation response to ADP was significantly higher in the ASA group than in the CLO and dual therapy groups (p=0.0001). In patients receiving ASA monotherapy, the maximum amplitude of aggregation response to platelet agonists was ≥70% in 43% of patients for ADP and 28% for collagen by LT-LA. Elevated ADP (≥0.29 nmol) and collagen (≥0.41 nmol)-induced adenosine triphosphate release were found by LT-LA in 66% of patients utilizing an ADP agonist and 80% of patients using a collagen agonist undergoing ASA therapy. Closure times obtained with the PFA-100 were normal in 28% of patients using collagen-ADP cartridges and 62% of patients using collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) cartridges who received ASA. Recurrent thrombosis and bleeding were observed in 12 (20%) patients with cardiovascular disease. Three of these individuals (25%) showed ASA resistance with normal responses to ADP-induced aggregation (≥70%) and secretion (≥0.29 nmol), as well as normal CEPI closure times. Our findings suggest that antiplatelet drug monitoring by LT-LA and PFA-100 may be useful for high-risk and complicated cardiovascular patients.

Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin vs Aspirin Alone in Patients With Acute Mild to Moderate Stroke

Dual antiplatelet therapy has been demonstrated to be superior to single antiplatelet in reducing recurrent stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack or minor stroke, but robust evidence for its effect in patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke is lacking. To evaluate whether dual antiplatelet therapy is superior to single antiplatelet among patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke. This was a multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, randomized clinical trial conducted at 66 hospitals in China from December 20, 2016, through August 9, 2022. The date of final follow-up was October 30, 2022. The analysis was reported on March 12, 2023. Of 3065 patients with ischemic stroke, 3000 patients with acute mild to moderate stroke within 48 hours of symptom onset were enrolled, after excluding 65 patients who did not meet eligibility criteria or had no randomization outcome. Within 48 hours after symptom onset, patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 1541) or aspirin alone (n = 1459) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as an increase of 2 or more points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, but not as a result of cerebral hemorrhage, compared with baseline. The superiority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was assessed based on a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomized participants with at least 1 efficacy evaluation regardless of treatment allocation. Bleeding events were safety end points. Of the 3000 randomized patients, 1942 (64.6%) were men, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (10.6) years, median (IQR) NIHSS score at admission was 5 (4-6), and 1830 (61.0%) had a stroke of undetermined cause. A total of 2915 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Early neurologic deterioration occurred in 72 of 1502 (4.8%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group vs 95 of 1413 (6.7%) in the aspirin alone group (risk difference -1.9%; 95% CI, -3.6 to -0.2; P = .03). Similar bleeding events were found between 2 groups. Among Chinese patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke, clopidogrel plus aspirin was superior to aspirin alone with regard to reducing early neurologic deterioration at 7 days with similar safety profile. These findings indicate that dual antiplatelet therapy may be a superior choice to aspirin alone in treating patients with acute mild to moderate stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869009.

The effect of argatroban on early neurological deterioration and outcomes in minor ischemic stroke: preliminary findings.

Minor ischemic stroke (MIS) is associated with early neurological deterioration (END) and poor prognosis. Here, we investigated whether argatroban administration can mitigate MIS-associated END and improve functional outcomes by monitoring activated partial thrombin time (APTT). Data were collected for patients with MIS admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022. Patients were divided into a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group (aspirin + clopidogrel) and an argatroban group (aspirin + argatroban). Those in the latter group who achieved a target APTT of 1.5-3-fold that of baseline and <100 s at 2 h after argatroban infusion were included in the argatroban subgroup. The primary outcome was the END rate of the DAPT group versus that of the argatroban group or the argatroban subgroup. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 7 and 90 days. In addition, baseline date were compared between patients with and without END in the argatroban group. 363 patients were included in the DAPT group and 270 in the argatroban group. There were no significant differences in any above outcome between them. 207 pairs were included in the DAPT group and the argatroban subgroup after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Significant differences were observed in the proportion of END (OR, 2.337; 95% CI, 1.200-4.550, p = 0.011) and mRS 0-2 at 7 days (OR, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.415-0.939, p = 0.023), but not in mRS 0-2 at 90 days or the hemorrhagic events between the two groups. In the argatroban group, univariate analysis showed that the rate of diabetes (OR, 2.316; 95% CI, 1.107-4.482, p = 0.023), initial random blood glucose (OR, 1.235; 95% CI, 1.070-1.425, p = 0.004), drinking history (OR, 0.445; 95% CI, 0.210-0.940, p = 0.031) or those reaching the target APTT (OR, 0.418; 95% CI, 0.184-0.949, p = 0.033) was significantly different among patients with and without END. However, there were no statistical differences in these parameters between them following multivariate analysis. In patients with MIS, argatroban administration and reaching the target APTT can reduce the incidence of END and improve short-term functional prognosis.

Prasugrel Single Antiplatelet Therapy versus Aspirin and Clopidogrel Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Flow Diverter Treatment for Cerebral Aneurysms: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

The optimal antiplatelet regimen after flow diverter treatment of cerebral aneurysms is still a matter of debate. A single antiplatelet therapy might be advantageous in determined clinical scenarios. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin and clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy. We performed a post hoc analysis of 4 retrospective multicenter studies including ruptured and unruptured aneurysms treated with flow diversion using either prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy or dual antiplatelet therapy. Primary end points were the occurrence of any kind of procedure- or device-related thromboembolic complications and complete aneurysm occlusion at the latest radiologic follow-up (mean, 18 months). Dichotomized comparisons of outcomes were performed between single antiplatelet therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, the influence of various patient- and aneurysm-related variables on the occurrence of thromboembolic complications was investigated using multivariable backward logistic regression. A total of 222 patients with 251 aneurysms were included, 90 (40.5%) in the single antiplatelet therapy and 132 (59.5%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. The primary outcome-procedure- or device-related thromboembolic complications-occurred in 6 patients (6.6%) of the single antiplatelet therapy and in 12 patients (9.0%) of the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .62; OR, 0.712; 95% CI, 0.260-1.930). The primary treatment efficacy end point was reached in 82 patients (80.4%) of the single antiplatelet therapy and in 115 patients (78.2%) of the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .752; OR, 1.141; 95% CI, 0.599-2.101). Logistic regression showed that non-surface-modified flow diverters (P = .014) and fusiform aneurysm morphology (P = .004) significantly increased the probability of thromboembolic complications. Prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy after flow diverter treatment may be as safe and effective as dual antiplatelet therapy and could, therefore, be a valid alternative in selected patients. Further prospective comparative studies are required to validate our findings.