Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

Investigation of cardiotoxicity with concomitant use of anthracyclines and checkpoint inhibitors.

e24022 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment and currently are the standard of care for early stage triple negative breast cancer in combination with anthracyclines (AC). It is known that both ICI and AC carry risk of cardiotoxicity. Studies have also shown that there is increased risk of cardiotoxicity with dual ICI. However no studies have evaluated the risk with concomitant use of ICI and AC. Here we investigated if there is increased cardiotoxicity risk with this combination regimen in a retrospective study. Methods: We did a retrospective analysis of patients with stage II and stage III triple negative breast cancer treated with combined AC and ICI at University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute Mobile, AL from January 2020 until June 2023. Data included demographics, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and treatment. CV risk factors were detailed from 2022 ASCO guidelines. Echocardiograms were used to evaluate left ventricular ejection (LVEF). Therapy related cardiovascular toxicity was defined by ESC guidelines 2022 as any new decrease in LVEF to < 40% or any decrease in LVEF < 50% and 10 percentage points decrease from baseline. Adverse events (AE) and risk analysis were calculated. Results: Of the total 49 patients, all were female with a mean age of 53 years old (30-82). 55% of patients had less than 2 CV risk factors (n = 27) and 45% had more than 2 (n = 22). 84% completed all 4 cycles of neoadjuvant AC course without dose adjustment. The median number of cycles of Pembrolizumab was 12 with a range of 7 to 17 cycles including adjuvant Pembrolizumab. All patients had a baseline echo with LVEF > 55%. Two patients (0.04%) developed cardiotoxicity. One patient had LVEF that decreased to EF 45-50% while on surveillance. Another patient developed myocarditis during treatment with EF 25-30% and died from cardiogenic shock. Both patients had 2 CV risk factors and were African American. Only 24% (n = 12) had surveillance echocardiograms completed one year post treatment. Conclusions: Our study results showed that cardiotoxicity risk was lower compared to that in the Keynote-522 trial. The outcomes are limited as a majority (76%) of the patients did not have surveillance echos completed. While the risk of cardiotoxicity with ICI and AC have been studied independently, there have been mouse models that showed that AC therapy may make heart vulnerable to toxicity from ICI therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate cardiotoxicity in patients who received concomitant AC and ICI treatment. Our study highlights the importance of prospective studies and long term follow up to monitor cardiotoxicity in these patients as early detection is key to prevent future morbidity. [Table: see text]

Characteristics of hospital admission during checkpoint-inhibition therapy.

e14510 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have enriched the therapeutic armamentarium in outpatient oncology care; however, data on necessity of hospitalizations associated with immune-related adverse event (irAEs) are scarce. Here, we retrospectively characterize hospitalizations of patients (pts) undergoing ICI. Methods: Between 12/2019 and 06/2022, 237 pts were included. Clinical data and characteristics of ICI were collected during a 6-month observation period after the initiation of therapy. Descriptive Statistics and Kaplan-Meier statistics were administered. Results: 30 out of 237 pts were hospitalized (HA+). Most common underlying tumor entities in the overall cohort were malignant melanoma (59.5%), renal cell carcinoma (13.1%), and non-small cell lung carcinoma (12.7%). Hospitalized pts exhibited an increased rate of pulmonary and cerebral metastases. We observed a significantly higher hospitalization rate during dual ICI with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab. The predominant irAEs for hospitalization were colitis (26.7), followed by hypophysitis (13.3%), leading to a median hospitalization of 7 days (range 1-34). Most pts were treated on the general ward (76.7%). Interdisciplinary consultations were frequent, especially to gastroenterology (46.7%) and neurology (26.7%). Although a trend towards an overall survival in the HA+ subgroup was identified, no statistically significant difference was found among the subgroups. Conclusions: The hospitalization rate of 12.6% is comparable to the literature. There was a disproportionate admission of patients with immune-related colitis and hypophysitis compared to the prevalence described under ICI. We observed a high need for interdisciplinary consults in line with the heterogeneity of immune-mediated side effects. When compared to non-hospitalized pts, there was no survival disadvantage in the cohort of hospitalized patients.

Survival Impact of Glucocorticoid Administration for Adverse Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The impact of glucocorticoid administration for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs, on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown. To clarify the prognostic impact of glucocorticoid use for AEs during first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. We retrospectively evaluated data from 194 patients who received dual ICI combination therapy [i.e., immunotherapy (IO)-IO] or combinations of ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the history of glucocorticoid administration in each treatment group. Survival based on glucocorticoid administration was assessed. A total of 101 (52.0%) and 93 (48.0%) patients received IO-IO and IO-TKI combination therapy, respectively. Glucocorticoids were administered to 46 (46%) and 22 (24%) patients in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, respectively. In the IO-IO group, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients with glucocorticoid administration than in those without administration (median PFS: 14.4 versus 3.45 months, p = 0.0005; median OS: 77.6 versus 33.9 months, p = 0.0025). Multivariable analysis showed that glucocorticoid administration was an independent predictor of longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.43, p = 0.0005) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.35, p = 0.0067) after adjustment for covariates. In the IO-TKI group, neither PFS nor OS significantly differed between patients treated with and without glucocorticoid administration (PFS: p = 0.0872, OS: p = 0.216). Glucocorticoid administration did not negatively impact the effectiveness of ICI combination therapy for RCC, prompting glucocorticoid treatment use when AEs develop.

Janus kinase inhibitor overcomes resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer in C57BL/6J mice.

Cancer immunotherapy aims to unleash the immune system's potential against cancer cells, providing sustained relief for tumors responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While promising in gastric cancer (GC) trials, the efficacy of ICIs diminishes in the context of peritoneal dissemination. Our objective is to identify strategies to enhance the impact of ICI treatment specifically for cases involving peritoneal dissemination in GC. The therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD1, CTLA4 treatment alone, or in combination was assessed using the YTN16 peritoneal dissemination tumor model. Peritoneum and peritoneal exudate cells were collected for subsequent analysis. Immunohistochemical staining, flow cytometry, and bulk RNA-sequence analyses were conducted to evaluate the tumor microenvironment (TME). A Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was introduced based on the pathway analysis results. Anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 combination treatment (dual ICI treatment) demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in certain mice, primarily mediated by CD8 + T cells. However, in mice resistant to dual ICI treatment, even with CD8 + T cell infiltration, most of the T cells exhibited anexhaustion phenotype. Notably, resistant tumors displayed abnormal activation of the Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway compared to the untreated group, with observed infiltration of macrophages, neutrophils, and Tregs in the TME. The concurrent administration of JAKi rescued CD8 + T cells function and reshaped the immunosuppressive TME, resulting in enhanced efficacy of the dual ICI treatment. Dual ICI treatment exerts its anti-tumor effects by increasing tumor-specific CD8 + T cell infiltration, and the addition of JAKi further improves ICI resistance by reshaping the immunosuppressive TME.

Single-cell transcriptomic analyses reveal distinct immune cell contributions to epithelial barrier dysfunction in checkpoint inhibitor colitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized oncology, but treatments are limited by immune-related adverse events, including checkpoint inhibitor colitis (irColitis). Little is understood about the pathogenic mechanisms driving irColitis, which does not readily occur in model organisms, such as mice. To define molecular drivers of irColitis, we used single-cell multi-omics to profile approximately 300,000 cells from the colon mucosa and blood of 13 patients with cancer who developed irColitis (nine on anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy and four on dual ICI therapy; most patients had skin or lung cancer), eight controls on ICI therapy and eight healthy controls. Patients with irColitis showed expanded mucosal Tregs, ITGAEHi CD8 tissue-resident memory T cells expressing CXCL13 and Th17 gene programs and recirculating ITGB2Hi CD8 T cells. Cytotoxic GNLYHi CD4 T cells, recirculating ITGB2Hi CD8 T cells and endothelial cells expressing hypoxia gene programs were further expanded in colitis associated with anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy compared to anti-PD-1 therapy. Luminal epithelial cells in patients with irColitis expressed PCSK9, PD-L1 and interferon-induced signatures associated with apoptosis, increased cell turnover and malabsorption. Together, these data suggest roles for circulating T cells and epithelial-immune crosstalk critical to PD-1/CTLA-4-dependent tolerance and barrier function and identify potential therapeutic targets for irColitis.

Impact of smoking status on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens.

Current tobacco smoking is independently associated with decreased overall survival (OS) among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with targeted monotherapy (VEGF-TKI). Herein, we assess the influence of smoking status on the outcomes of patients with mRCC treated with the current first-line standard of care of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens. Real-world data from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) were collected retrospectively. Patients with mRCC who received either dual ICI therapy or ICI with VEGF-TKI in the first-line setting were included and were categorized as current, former, or nonsmokers. The primary outcomes were OS, time to treatment failure (TTF), and objective response rate (ORR). OS and TTF were compared between groups using the log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression models. ORR was assessed between the 3 groups using a multivariable logistic regression model. A total of 989 eligible patients were included in the analysis, with 438 (44.3%) nonsmokers, 415 (42%) former, and 136 (13.7%) current smokers. Former smokers were older and included more males, while other baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Median follow-up for OS was 21.2 months. In the univariate analysis, a significant difference between groups was observed for OS (P = .027) but not for TTF (P = .9), with current smokers having the worse 2-year OS rate (62.8% vs 70.8% and 73.1% in never and former smokers, respectively). After adjusting for potential confounders, no significant differences in OS or TTF were observed among the 3 groups. However, former smokers demonstrated a higher ORR compared to never smokers (OR 1.45, P = .02). Smoking status does not appear to independently influence the clinical outcomes to first-line ICI-based regimens in patients with mRCC. Nonetheless, patient counseling on tobacco cessation remains a crucial aspect of managing patients with mRCC, as it significantly reduces all-cause mortality.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis

Several studies have evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic uveal melanoma; however, the efficacy of ICIs in the previous studies varied greatly. In this systematic review, we searched for prospective or retrospective studies on single or dual-ICIs for metastatic uveal melanoma treatment. A random-effect model meta-analysis with generic inverse-variance was conducted, and 36 articles representing 41 cohorts of 1414 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were included. The pooled outcomes were as follows: objective response rate (ORR) was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 3.7–7.5%; I2, 36%), disease control rate (DCR) was 32.5% (95% CI 27.2–37.7%; I2, 73%), median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.7–2.9 months; I2, 26%), and median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months (95% CI 9.6–13.2 months; I2, 74%). Compared to single-agent ICI, dual ICI led to better ORR (single-agent: 3.4% [95% CI 1.8–5.1]; dual-agent: 12.4% [95% CI 8.0–16.9]; P < 0.001), DCR (single-agent: 29.3%, [95% CI 23.4–35.2]; dual-agent: 44.3% [95% CI 31.7–56.8]; P = 0.03), and OS (single-agent: 9.8 months [95% CI 8.0–12.2]; dual-agent: 16.3 months [95% CI 13.5–19.7]; P < 0.001). Our analysis provided treatment outcomes as described above. Dual-ICIs appear better than single-agent ICIs for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.

Targeted DNA Sequencing of Cutaneous Melanoma Identifies Prognostic and Predictive Alterations.

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) can be molecularly classified into four groups: BRAF mutant, NRAS mutant, NF1 mutant and triple wild-type (TWT) tumors lacking any of these three alterations. In the era of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and targeted molecular therapy, the clinical significance of these groups remains unclear. Here, we integrate targeted DNA sequencing with comprehensive clinical follow-up in CM patients. This was a retrospective cohort study that assessed clinical and molecular features from patients with localized or metastatic CM who underwent targeted next-generation sequencing as part of routine clinical care. A total of 254 patients with CM who had a CLIA-certified targeted sequencing assay performed on their tumor tissue were included. Of the 254 patients with cutaneous melanoma, 77 were BRAF mutant (30.3%), 77 were NRAS mutant (30.3%), 47 were NF1 mutant (18.5%), 33 were TWT (13.0%) and the remaining 20 (7.9%) carried mutations in multiple driver genes (BRAF/NRAS/NF1 co-mutated). The majority of this co-mutation group carried mutations in NF1 (n = 19 or 90%) with co-occurring mutations in BRAF or NRAS, often with a weaker oncogenic variant. Consistently, NF1 mutant tumors harbored numerous significantly co-altered genes compared to BRAF or NRAS mutant tumors. The majority of TWT tumors (n = 29, 87.9%) harbor a pathogenic mutation within a known Ras/MAPK signaling pathway component. Of the 154 cases with available TMB data, the median TMB was 20 (range 0.7-266 mutations/Mb). A total of 14 cases (9.1%) were classified as having a low TMB (≤5 mutations/Mb), 64 of 154 (41.6%) had an intermediate TMB (>5 and ≤20 mutations/Mb), 40 of 154 (26.0%) had a high TMB (>20 and ≤50 mutations/Mb) and 36 of 154 (23.4%) were classified as having a very high TMB (>50 mutations/Mb). NRAS mutant melanoma demonstrated significantly decreased overall survival on multivariable analysis (HR for death 2.95, 95% CI 1.13-7.69, p = 0.027, log-rank test) compared with other TCGA molecular subgroups. Of the 116 patients in our cohort with available treatment data, 36 received a combination of dual ICI with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 inhibition as first-line therapy. Elevated TMB was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival following dual-agent ICI (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.90, p = 0.033, log-rank test). NRAS mutation in CMs correlated with significantly worse overall survival. Elevated TMB was associated with increased progression-free survival for patients treated with a combination of dual ICI, supporting the potential utility of TMB as a predictive biomarker for ICI response in melanoma.

Abstract 700: Impact of heterogeneity for mismatch repair activity on colon tumor development and therapeutic response

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancers (CRC) that are deficient for DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) proteins have high levels of genetic instability and consequently high mutational burden, creating numerous neoantigens that can elicit an immune response. Therefore, dMMR CRC are the best candidates for immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) compared to proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) CRC. Early clinical trials revealed that only 30-55% metastatic dMMR CRC responded to ICI. Recent studies utilizing allograft models have demonstrated that tumor immune landscape can be primed with radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Although early results have been quite promising, allograft models often fail to accurately predict efficacy for many reasons, but most often are due to a lack of heterogeneity. Methods: To better understand how heterogenous MMR expression impacts tumor development and response to ICI alone or in combination with RPT, we developed a new mouse model that develops three tumor types: (1) homotypic dMMR tumors that express green fluorescent protein, (2) homotypic pMMR tumors that express red fluorescent protein, and (3) heterotypic tumors with a mixture of dMMR and pMMR cells. Surveillance bright field and fluorescent colonoscopies allow us to assess treatment response by measuring tumor size and proportion of dMMR and pMMR tumor cells in real-time. These outcomes are verified through ex vivo imaging and histological analysis. Results: Tumor response to anti-PD-L1 ICI was dependent on MMR status. Homotypic dMMR tumors exhibited the strongest response: significantly smaller in treated mice than controls, exhibited areas of vascular congestion and increased CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells infiltration. Response of heterotypic MMR tumors varied depending on percentage of dMMR cells; tumors with a high percentage of dMMR cells remained small, whereas tumors with a low percentage of dMMR had an outgrowth of pMMR cells. Treated and untreated homotypic pMMR tumors were indistinguishable. To enhance the response of all three tumor types, mice were treated with dual ICI treatment, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4, or RPT. Animals administered the tri-therapy (dual ICI + RPT) survived significantly longer with fewer tumors than animals treated with either dual ICI or RPT alone. Conclusions: Our innovative mouse model allows for the highly detailed characterization of tumor response to therapies. Simplistic allograft models may not adequately account for the dynamic effects that neighboring cell death may have on radio-resistant cells, on tumor vascular perfusion and oxygenation, or on tumor immune infiltration and adaptive immune recognition of remaining cells. We begin to fill these critical gaps in knowledge and therefore the results from our studies will help guide the translation and integrated use of ICIs and RPTs in clinic. Citation Format: Santina M. Snow, Dawn Albrecht, Paul A. Clark, Caroline P. Kerr, Joseph J. Grudzinski, Justin J. Jeffery, Hansel Comas Rojas, Reinier Hernandez, Kristina A. Matkowskyj, Jamey P. Weichert, Zachary S. Morris, Richard B. Halberg. Impact of heterogeneity for mismatch repair activity on colon tumor development and therapeutic response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 700.

Abstract 1366: Dual immune checkpoint inhibition enhances the anti-tumor activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan in preclinical models

Abstract Background Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Recent clinical trials such as BEGONIA have highlighted the potential therapeutic benefit in combining T-DXd with immuno-oncology (IO) agents such as the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab. Here, we report preclinical findings demonstrating enhanced anti-tumor activity when T-DXd is combined with dual immune checkpoint inhibition. Methods HER2-expressing human cancer cell lines were treated in vitro with T-DXd and assessed for induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD) markers and expression of NK cell-activating ligands. Human macrophages and T cells were incubated with supernatants from treated cancer cells, and their activation status evaluated via flow cytometry. In vivo, the effects of T-DXd in combination with inhibitors of PD-L1, CTLA-4, and a monovalent bispecific anti-PD-1/TIGIT antibody - a murine surrogate of rilvegostomig - on tumor growth were evaluated in BALB/c mice bearing human HER2-low EMT6 murine mammary tumors. The anti-tumor activity of T-DXd in combination with volrustomig, a monovalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, was also assessed in hu-CD34+ NSG mice bearing HER2-low Caki-1 renal cell carcinoma tumors. Results In vitro, T-DXd induced ICD via DXd-mediated extracellular release of inflammatory mediators ATP and HMGB1, and cell surface exposure of calreticulin. This was associated with a greater than 2-fold increase in expression of NK cell-activating ligands, and activation of both macrophages and T cells. In immunocompetent mice bearing human HER2 expressing EMT6 tumors, T-DXd treatment drove tumor growth inhibition (53%, P &amp;lt;0.001) that was associated with an increase in tumoral T cells (2.6-fold, P &amp;lt;0.05) and increased CD8+ T cell expression of the immune checkpoints PD-1, TIGIT, and TIM-3. Tumor growth inhibition relative to vehicle-treated mice was enhanced when T-DXd was combined with inhibitors of PD-L1 (108%, P &amp;lt;0.001), PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 (172%, P &amp;lt;0.001), or a bispecific PD-1/TIGIT inhibitor (181%, P &amp;lt;0.001). Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed how the combination of T-DXd and PD-1/TIGIT inhibition increased tumoral NK cells (3.2-fold, P &amp;lt;0.001) and CD8+ T cells (3.8-fold, P &amp;lt;0.001) relative to vehicle. Consistent with findings in syngeneic models, the combination of T-DXd with a bispecific PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitor also enhanced tumor growth inhibition in a humanised Caki-1 model (121%) compared to T-DXd alone (72%) (P &amp;lt;0.001). Conclusions These data provide insight into the clinical activity observed with T-DXd and provide scientific rationale for combination strategies with novel, bispecific IO agents targeting CTLA-4 or TIGIT in addition to the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Citation Format: Liam Jenkins, Laura Kazlauskas, Matt Wilson, Scott A. Hammond, Theresa Proia, Jerome Mettetal. Dual immune checkpoint inhibition enhances the anti-tumor activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan in preclinical models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1366.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has demonstrated beneficial outcomes in various cancer types; however, standardized protocols for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are currently lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the reliability of neoadjuvant immunotherapy's efficacy and safety in the context of HCC. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and conference proceedings to identify clinical trials involving resectable HCC and neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Single-arm meta-analyses were employed to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity analysis, data quality assessment, and subgroup analyses based on the type of immunotherapy drugs and combination therapies were performed. This meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (identifier CRD42023474276). This meta-analysis included 255 patients from 11 studies. Among resectable HCC patients, neoadjuvant immunotherapy exhibited an overall major pathological response (MPR) rate of 0.47 (95% CI 0.31-0.70) and a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 0.22 (95% CI 0.14-0.36). The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 0.37 (95% CI 0.20-0.69), with a grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) incidence rate of 0.35 (95% CI 0.24-0.51). Furthermore, the combined surgical resection rate was 3.08 (95% CI 1.66-5.72). Subgroup analysis shows no significant differences in the efficacy and safety of different single-agent immunotherapies; the efficacy of dual ICIs (Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors) combination therapy is superior to targeted combined immunotherapy and monotherapy, while the reverse is observed in terms of safety. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy presents beneficial outcomes in the treatment of resectable HCC. However, large-scale, high-quality experiments are warranted in the future to provide robust data support.

Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

To indirectly compare the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) by network meta-analysis (NMA). Through August 1, 2023, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ICI-based treatment for R/M HNSCC. Outcomes of interest included overall and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Addis 16.5 software was used to perform NMA. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) was used to assess confidence in the evidence. Nine RCTs were included in this NMA, involving a total of 4016 patients. The general safety of ICI-based treatments in descending order was as follows: Durvalumab + Tremelimumab, Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy, Durvalumab, Toripalimab + Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab, Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy, Nivolumab, Tremelimumab. There were differences in the toxicity profile among Toripalimab + Chemotherapy (dermatologic irAEs), Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy (hypothyroidism), Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis), Pembrolizumab (nephrotoxicity), Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (colitis). ICI-based treatment increased the incidence of endocrine irAEs (hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism) and pneumonitis compared to conventional therapy. Besides, the combination of dual ICIs resulted in a greater occurrence of irAEs compared to the use of a single ICI. The safety ranking of treatments based on ICIs is significantly influenced by specific irAEs. These irAEs, which vary in type and severity, play a crucial role in determining the overall safety profile of each ICI regimen. PROSPERO CRD42023460267.

First-line dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies versus combination therapies comprising immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a comparative analysis of the effectiveness using real-world data.

There are few comparative studies on dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e., IO-IO) and combination therapies comprising ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (i.e., IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in real-world settings. We retrospectively evaluated data of 175 patients with IMDC intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC; as first-line therapy, 103 received IO-IO, and 72 received IO-TKI. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to balance patients' backgrounds in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups. Based on the IPTW analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (median: 15.6 vs. 8.3months; p = 0.0386). In contrast, overall survival was not different between groups (median: 46.7 vs. 49.0months; p = 0.465). Although the IPTW-adjusted objective response rate was not significantly different (51.2% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.359), the progressive disease rate as the best overall response was lower in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (3.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.0001). Regarding the safety profile, the treatment interruption rate was higher in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (70.3% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.005). In contrast, the IO-IO group had a higher corticosteroid administration rate (43.3% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001). IO-TKI therapy exhibited superior effectiveness over IO-IO therapy in terms of PFS improvement and immediate disease progression prevention and was associated with a higher risk of treatment interruption and a lower risk of needing corticosteroids.

Evaluating intermediate endpoints (IE) for overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): An IMDC study.

400 Background: In Ph3 trials, assessment for primary endpoint of OS necessitates extended follow-up (f/u) periods, larger pool of events, and higher associated costs. We sought to determine if shorter IEs like Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) and Time to Next Therapy (TTNT) are associated with OS in patients (pts) receiving ICI-based trt. Methods: We included all International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) pts who received contemporary approved first line(1L) ICI from 2013 to 2023. IEs were defined from ICI start until drug cessation or death for TTF, and initiation of next line or death for TTNT, or censored at date of last f/u. Associations of OS with TTF and TTNT status at 6-mo landmark were assessed using Cox regression adjusting for IMDC risk groups, metastatic sites, histology, age, and prior nephrectomy, stratified by treatment (trt) and yrs of ICI start. Endpoint associations across all f/u time were evaluated using Kendall’s Tau (KT) correlation by Clayton copula. A KT &gt;0.49 indicates a strong correlation ( Wicklin R., 2023). Results: The cohort consisted of 1667 pts with a median f/u of 15.4 mo (IQR: 7.1-28.6). Median age at 1L start was 63 yrs (IQR: 56-70), with 73% being male and 65% undergoing nephrectomy before starting 1L. 1132 patients received dual ICI, while 535 received an ICI+TKI combination. Pts who discontinued their 1L regimen within the 6-mo landmark demonstrated poor OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.74 (95% CI: 2.15-3.49). Additionally, those who transitioned to a 2L therapy within the first 6 mo showed worse OS, reflected by an HR of 2.82 (2.22-3.59). KT correlation with OS across all follow up was 0.49 (0.45, 0.52) for TTF and 0.67 (0.64, 0.69) for TTNT. Consistent results were seen across all subgroups with the strongest association in the ICI+TKI group (Table). Conclusions: TTNT demonstrated the strongest association with OS, particularly in the ICI+TKI subgroup, making it a potentially clinically meaningful intermediate endpoint for evaluating efficacy in ICI-based regimens.[Table: see text]

Combination nivolumab and ipilimumab with and without camu camu in first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

TPS491 Background: Combination immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) is an established first-line treatment for patients (pts) with intermediate and poor-risk mRCC. CheckMate214 demonstrated a survival advantage with ipi/nivo over sunitinib; unfortunately, 20% of cases developed primary progression to immunotherapy. Recent data suggest that the gut microbiome is key in modulating clinical responses and immune-related toxicities. Therefore, modulating the gut microbiome is a novel adjunct strategy to dual ICI in mRCC. Our group has previously proven that the addition of a live bacterial product (CBM588) enhances clinical responses in pts with mRCC treated with ICI, and the combination of ICI (Dizman et al., 2022) or with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Ebrahimi et al., 2023). Camu camu ( Myrciaria dubia) is a comestible berry characterized by a polyphenol-rich nutritional profile. In extract form, it is rich in castalagin, which appears to have probiotic properties. In mouse tumor models, camu camu increased the abundance of fecal Ruminococcus spp. when combined with ICI (Messaoudene et al., 2022). This shift in the gut microbiome composition was associated with stronger CD8+ T-cell and CD4+ Th1-dependent antitumor responses. Camu camu and ICI reestablished the efficacy of anti-PD1 therapy, reducing tumor size compared to ICI alone. This pilot study aims to identify the biological effect of camu camu with ipi/nivo in pts with mRCC. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, single-center trial comparing camu camu with ipi/nivo versus ipi/nivo alone in pts with treatment-naïve mRCC. Eligibility criteria include pts ≥ 18 year old, PS 0-1, histological confirmation of clear-cell RCC with or without a sarcomatoid component, intermediate or poor risk per IMDC, no prior systemic treatment and measurable disease,. 30 pts will be enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 fashion, favoring the study arm. Pts will be treated with camu camu at 1500 mg PO daily, in with ipi/nivo at standard dosing. Pts will be followed monthly. Treatment will be continued until progression (RECIST v1.1) or toxicity. The primary endpoint is change in the abundance of Ruminococcus spp. in the stool from baseline to week 12 of therapy. We have 80% power to detect a 1 SD difference between the mean change detected in the two groups using a two-group T-test with a one-sided type I error of 0.05. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, progression-free survival, safety, effect on gut microbiome diversity and function, comparison of the proportion of circulating cytokines and chemokines from baseline to week 12, and changes in the abundance of metabolic pathways and fungal microbiome profile. Response will be assessed by CT after the first 12 weeks of therapy and every 12 weeks, thereafter. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT06049576 .

Phase 1/2 trial of vesicular stomatitis virus expressing human interferon-β and NIS (VSV-IFNβ-NIS), with ipilimumab and nivolumab, in patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma.

TPS602 Background: Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is an aggressive malignancy comprising both pulmonary and extrapulmonary primary sites. NEC includes both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), as well as other neuroendocrine carcinomas arising from any primary organ. A substantial portion (~40%) of NEC arises from gastrointestinal primary sites. The optimal systemic therapy beyond first line platinum and etoposide is not established. There is a critical need to improve upon the median survival in the second line, as most patients do not survive more than 6 months. The efficacy of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) therapy in NEC shows some promise, but most tumors do not respond. One possible explanation for this is that the tumor microenvironment in NEC is non-inflamed. VSV-IFNβ-NIS is a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-based oncolytic virus being tested in multiple early phase clinical trials. Preliminary studies of immune responses in patients receiving VSV-IFNβ-NIS therapy suggest some patients develop T cell responses to viral antigens and known tumor antigens. We hypothesize that VSV-IFNβ-NIS therapy may convert a non-inflamed or immune-excluded phenotype in NEC to a highly inflamed phenotype that sensitizes the tumor to ICIs. Methods: This is a phase 1-2 safety run-in study designed to determine the safety and efficacy of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in combination with dual ICI therapy, ipilimumab and nivolumab, followed by dose expansion in patients with refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or NEC. After a safety run-in, we will be testing the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in an expansion cohort of patients with SCLC or NEC of any primary site. Patients must have previously progressed on at least one line of systemic therapy. Prior treatment with checkpoint inhibitors is permitted. Patients are treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab on day 1, followed by one RP2D of 1.0x10^11 TCID50 VSV-IFNβ-NIS on day 4, followed by nivolumab every 3 weeks and ipilimumab every 6 weeks until progression, up to 2 years. The primary objective is to estimate the response rate by RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include estimation of disease-control rate, duration or response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety signals. The NEC expansion cohort will seek to enroll 10 patients. If at least one objective response is observed, and safety is confirmed, the regimen will be considered for future study. Clinical trial information: NCT03647163 .

Single agent vs combination immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a review of the evidence.

The aim of this review is to outline the current landscape of advanced melanoma treatment options, provide insights on selecting combination therapies within different clinical scenarios, capture clinical relevance of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy, and explore the unmet needs with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) in advanced melanoma. ICI based treatment consisted of single agent ICI or dual combination ICI-ICI is the standard of care of front-line treatment of metastatic or unresectable melanoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab) improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors (Ipilimumab and Tremelimumab). The dual ICI combination (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) provided profound and durable responses better than monotherapy, and the longest overall survival ever achieved in advanced disease, including in patients with murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF)-mutated disease, but at the cost of a high risk of severe toxicity. The new dual blockage of LAG-3 and PD-1 (Nivolumab-Relatlimab) emerges as a valid option with promising efficacy outcomes and a favourable toxicity profile. Mature survival data is still needed to capture the real benefit. These new plethora of options pose new challenges not only for optimal treatment sequencing strategies but especially for management of adverse effects, endorsing the need to integrate a holistic and personalized approach for patient care.

Endocrine toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a network meta-analysis of the current evidence

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment but pose a challenge of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), particularly endocrine toxicity, that can severely compromise patient well-being. Existing research has often been limited in scope and has not provided comprehensive safety profiles across the diverse range of ICI therapies. We addressed this gap by performing a network meta-analysis on 55 randomized controlled trials involving 32,522 patients. Using STATA to calculate the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, we ranked the safety of various ICI monotherapies and combination therapies. ICIs were found to increase the risk of endocrine toxicities, such as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, hypophysitis, thyroiditis, and adrenal insufficiency; this risk was greater with dual ICI regimens. Specifically, cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, such as ipilimumab, are closely associated with hypophysitis, whereas programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, notably pembrolizumab and nivolumab, predispose patients to thyroid-related dysfunction, such as hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and thyroiditis. Interestingly, nivolumab showed no elevated risk of adrenal dysfunction, in contrast to the elevated risk observed with other ICI treatments. This study provides critical evidence-based insights for optimizing the risk-benefit balance of ICI therapies in clinical practice.

Long-Term Intracranial Outcomes With Combination Dual Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

The intracranial benefit of offering dual immune-checkpoint inhibition (D-ICPI) with ipilimumab and nivolumab to patients with melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BMs) is unknown. We hypothesized that D-ICPI improves local control compared with SRS alone. Patients with melanoma or NSCLC treated with SRS from 2014 to 2022 were evaluated. Patients were stratified by treatment with D-ICPI, single ICPI (S-ICPI), or SRS alone. Local recurrence, intracranial progression (IP), and overall survival were estimated using competing risk and Kaplan-Meier analyses. IP included both local and distant intracranial recurrence. Two hundred eighty-eight patients (44% melanoma, 56% NSCLC) with 1,704 BMs were included. Fifty-three percent of patients had symptomatic BMs. The median follow-up was 58.8 months. Twelve-month local control rates with D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone were 94.73% (95% CI, 91.11%-96.90%), 91.74% (95% CI, 89.30%-93.64%), and 88.26% (95% CI, 84.07%-91.41%). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, only D-ICPI was significantly associated with reduced local recurrence (P = .0032). On multivariate Cox regression, D-ICPI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4003; 95% CI, 0.1781-0.8728; P = .0239) and planning target volume (HR, 1.022; 95% CI, 1.004-1.035; P = .0059) correlated with local control. One hundred seventy-three (60%) patients developed IP. The 12-month cumulative incidence of IP was 41.27% (95% CI, 30.27%-51.92%), 51.86% (95% CI, 42.78%-60.19%), and 57.15% (95% CI, 44.98%-67.59%) after D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone. On competing risk analysis, only D-ICPI was significantly associated with reduced IP (P = .0408). On multivariate Cox regression, D-ICPI (HR, 0.595; 95% CI, 0.373-0.951; P = .0300) and presentation with >10 BMs (HR, 2.492; 95% CI, 1.668-3.725; P < .0001) remained significantly correlated with IP. The median overall survival after D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone was 26.1 (95% CI, 15.5-40.7), 21.5 (16.5-29.6), and 17.5 (11.3-23.8) months. S-ICPI, fractionation, and histology were not associated with clinical outcomes. There was no difference in hospitalizations or neurologic adverse events between cohorts. The addition of D-ICPI for patients with melanoma and NSCLC undergoing SRS is associated with improved local and intracranial control. This appears to be an effective strategy, including for patients with symptomatic or multiple BMs.

Selenium-Containing Nanocomplexes Achieve Dual Immune Checkpoint Blockade for NK Cell Reinvigoration.

The blockade of immune checkpoints has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapy. However, most of the current approaches focus on T cells, leaving natural killer (NK) cell-mediated therapeutic strategies rarely explored. Here, a selenium-containing nanocomplex is developed that acts as a dual immune checkpoint inhibitor to reinvigorate NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy. The Se nanocomplex can deliver and release siRNA that targets programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in tumor cells, thereby silencing the checkpoint receptor PD-L1. The intracellular reactive oxygen species generated by porphyrin derivatives in the nanocomplexes can oxidize the diselenide bond into seleninic acid, which blocks the expression of another checkpoint receptor, human leukocyte antigen E. The blockade of dual immune checkpoints shows synergistic effects on promoting NK cell-mediated antitumoral activity. This study provides a new strategy to reinvigorate NK cell immunity for the development of combined cancer immunotherapy.