Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score Research Articles

Predicting Individual Treatment Effects to Determine Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Stent Implantation.

After coronary stent implantation, prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) increases bleeding risk, requiring personalization of DAPT duration. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model to predict optimal DAPT duration after contemporary drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease. The One-Month DAPT, RESET (Real Safety and Efficacy of 3-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation), and IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesion) trials provided a derivation cohort (n=6568). Using the X-learner approach, an individualized DAPT score was developed to determine the therapeutic benefit of abbreviated (1-6 months) versus standard (12-month) DAPT using various predictors. The primary outcome was major bleeding; the secondary outcomes included 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and 1-year net adverse clinical events. The risk reduction with abbreviated DAPT (3 months) in the individualized DAPT-determined higher predicted benefit group was validated in the TICO (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial (n=3056), which enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor. The validation cohort comprised 1527 abbreviated and 1529 standard DAPT cases. Major bleeding occurred in 25 (1.7%) and 45 (3.0%) patients in the abbreviated and standard DAPT groups, respectively. The individualized DAPT score identified 2582 (84.5%) participants who would benefit from abbreviated DAPT, which was significantly associated with a lower major bleeding risk (absolute risk difference [ARD], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.15-2.36]) and net adverse clinical events (ARD, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.07-3.10]) but not major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ARD, 0.63 [95% CI, -0.34 to 1.61]), compared with standard DAPT in the higher predicted benefit group. Abbreviated DAPT had no significant difference in clinical outcomes of major bleeding (ARD, 1.49 [95% CI, -1.74 to 4.72]), net adverse clinical events (ARD, 2.57 [95% CI, -1.85 to 6.99]), or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (ARD, 1.54 [95% CI, -1.26 to 4.34]), compared with standard DAPT in the individualized DAPT-determined lower predicted benefit group. Machine learning using the X-learner approach identifies patients with acute coronary syndrome who may benefit from abbreviated DAPT after drug-eluting stent implantation, laying the groundwork for personalized antiplatelet therapy.

Associations Between Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score and Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis of More Than 27,000 Patients

BackgroundThe dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score was developed to identify patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are likely to derive benefit (score ≥ 2) or harm (score < 2) from extended DAPT beyond 1 year after PCI in terms of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. We examined the associations between DAPT score at index PCI and long-term mortality from an all-comers PCI registry in patients receiving DAPT according to the standard of care. MethodsWe retrospectively examined prospectively collected data from the Melbourne Interventional Group PCI database (2005-2018) and grouped patients as having DAPT score ≥ 2 or < 2. Long-term mortality was assessed from the Australian National Death Index linkage. The primary end point was long-term mortality as determined using survival analysis. Secondary end points included in-hospital events and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation. ResultsOf 27,740 study patients, 9402 (33.9%) had DAPT score ≥ 2. Patients with DAPT score ≥ 2 were younger, included more women, and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with DAPT score ≥ 2 had higher in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs 1.0%), major bleeding (2.3% vs 1.6%), 30-day MACE (7.1% vs 3.1%), and long-term mortality at a median follow-up of 5.17 years (21.9% vs 16.5%) P < 0.001 for all. ConclusionsOne-third of all-comer patients undergoing PCI had a DAPT score ≥ 2 with greater short-term ischemic and bleeding risk, and higher long-term mortality. Risk assessment with the DAPT score may guide the duration and intensity of DAPT beyond the early post-PCI period.

Abbreviated Versus Standard Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Times After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With High Bleeding Risk With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the SWEDEHEART Registry.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces ischemic events but increases bleeding risk, especially in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR). This study aimed to compare outcomes of abbreviated versus standard DAPT strategies in patients with HBR with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Bare in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry with at least 1 HBR criterion who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome were identified and included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their planned DAPT time at discharge: 12-month DAPT or an abbreviated DAPT strategy and matched according to their prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor at discharge. The primary outcome assessed was time to net adverse clinical events at 1 year, which encompassed cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or clinically significant bleeding. Time to major adverse cardiovascular events and the individual components of net adverse clinical events were considered secondary end points. A total of 4583 patients were included in each group. The most frequently met HBR criteria was age older than 75 years (65.6%) and Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy score ≥25 (44.6%) in the standard DAPT group and oral anticoagulant therapy (79.6%) and age 75 years and older (55.2%) in the abbreviated DAPT group. There was no statistically significant difference in net adverse clinical events (12.9% versus 13.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.88-1.11], P=0.83), major adverse cardiovascular events (8.6% versus 7.9%; HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.94-1.25]), or their components between groups. The results were consistent among all of the investigated subgroups. In patients with HBR undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention due to acute coronary syndrome, abbreviated DAPT was associated with comparable rates of net adverse clinical events and major adverse cardiovascular events to a DAPT duration of 12 months.

DISCONTINUING DAPT: NOT JUST A MATTER OF SCORES BUT OF INTEGRATED EVALUATION? A KEY ROLE OF IMAGING IN A COMPLEX SCENARIO

Abstract The duration of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a widely debated topic within the scientific community. The latest guidelines on acute coronary syndromes have supported the possibility of different therapeutic approaches tailored to patient characteristics. However, the clinical cardiologist‘s decisions are not always based on certain principles. The following case report is a practical example. Discussion: A 31–years–old man came to our attention after a resuscitated cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation during a motorcycle race. His history was characterized by a previous acute myocardial infarction at the age of thirteen due to a traumatic dissection of the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and ascending aorta treated conservatively, with residual transmural necrosis of the mid and subendocardial anterior wall on cardiac MRI. At the admission, ECG showed ST–segment elevation in the anterior leads. Coronary angiography revealed occlusion of the proximal LAD coronary artery, treated with drug–eluting stent (ONYX 5.0 mm), with evidence of dissection and aneurysmal wall of that segment. The patient started a DAPT with aspirin and prasugrel. At discharge, echocardiogram evidenced a moderate left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 34%) with signs of anterior and apical necrosis. Later, the patient was admitted for a subcutaneous defibrillator implantation, due to persistent moderate ventricular dysfunction. One year after revascularization, a lifelong DAPT strategy with downgrading to clopidogrel was considered the best choice for the following considerations: the young age of the patient, the low bleeding risk (PRECISE DAPT score 8), a not elevated DAPT score (value 2), the revascularization in the aneurysmal segment without an appropriate stent apposition (due to absence of a right sizing) and the previous dissection with sign of partial thrombosis at coronary CT. Conclusions: The anatomical complexity of angioplasty procedures and the delicate balance between ischemic and thrombotic risks have led to continuously evolving therapeutic strategies. The clinical scores currently available cannot often account for complex coronary anatomy. Thus, it‘s essential to consider a personalized approach, individualized on clinical and imaging characteristics, that encompasses ischemic and bleeding risk and procedural data for the appropriate treatment for each patient.

Parsimonious versus extensive score: can we simplify bleeding risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention without losing specificity?

Abstract Background/Introduction Prediction of bleeding risk in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been repeatedly attempted and resulted in multiple risk models. To promote the adoption and use of risk stratification among clinicians, a consortium in the South East of the Netherlands, the "ZON-HR", has created a simple binary variant of the existing logistic models. This model includes commonly available factors which can be incorporated into the PCI report to generate stratification. In this "parsimonious" model, high bleeding risk (HBR) is stratified according to: history of intracranial haemorrhage, previous spontaneous bleeding, Hb &amp;lt; 11 g/dL, eGFR&amp;lt; 30. Purpose We aimed to perform an external validation of our model for bleeding risk and to demonstrate its discriminative value in comparison with the PRECISE DAPT score, an acknowledged risk score. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, a multicenter randomized trial, comparing ticagrelor monotherapy after one month of DAPT with standard DAPT after PCI. We stratified the patients for HBR according to the ZON-HR or a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 25. Bleeding events one year after PCI were compared in the entire population and in subgroups for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), Ticagrelor monotherapy and DAPT. Results Of the 15968 patients included in GLOBAL LEADERS, 1059 patients were excluded due to missing variables required for either model. Among the 14909 patients, 17% had HBR according to the PRECISE DAPT score, 4% according to ZON-HR and 3% according to both. Bleeding events occurred in 8.5% and 13% of HBR defined by PRECISE DAPT or ZON-HR respectively. Patients with HBR according to both models showed 13% bleedings as opposed to 5% in non-HBR. Table 1 presents the sensitivity and specificity. Regression analysis (figure 1) demonstrated that patients with HBR according to either model have significantly more bleedings. This was also significant in all subgroups except for ACS patients receiving standard DAPT when the ZON-HR model was used. Conclusion The ZON-HR model is more conservative compared to the PRECISE DAPT score as depicted by the sensitivity and specificity. This can be explained by the larger number of risk factors used in the PRECISE DAPT score that cumulatively contributes to the sensitivity as opposed to the binary ZON-HR model which is more specific. However, the survival curves and hazard ratios showed good predictive value of both models for bleeding risk in the overall population.Table 1.Figure 1.

Comparison of Antiplatelet Monotherapies After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Clinical, Ischemic, and Bleeding Risks

BackgroundClopidogrel was superior to aspirin monotherapy in secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of clopidogrel across high-risk subgroups MethodsThis was a post hoc analysis of the HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases-EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) trial that randomly assigned patients who were event free for 6 to 18 months post-PCI on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy. Two clinical risk scores were used for risk stratification: the DAPT score and the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) (the sum of age ≥75 years, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, peripheral artery disease, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart failure, and renal dysfunction). The primary composite endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission because of acute coronary syndrome, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥3) at 2 years after randomization. ResultsAmong 5,403 patients, clopidogrel monotherapy showed a lower rate of the primary composite endpoint than aspirin monotherapy (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90). The benefit of clopidogrel over aspirin was consistent regardless of TRS 2°P (high TRS 2°P [≥3] group: HR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.44-0.96]; and low TRS 2°P [<3] group: HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.60-0.99]) (P for interaction = 0.454) and regardless of DAPT score (high DAPT score [≥2] group: HR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.46-1.00]; and low DAPT score [<2] group: HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59-0.96]) (P for interaction = 0.662). The association was similar for the individual outcomes. ConclusionsThe beneficial effect of clopidogrel over aspirin monotherapy was consistent regardless of clinical risk or relative ischemic and bleeding risks compared with aspirin monotherapy. (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis- EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy [HOST-EXAM]; NCT02044250)

TCT-354 The Clinical Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score Combined With P2Y12 Reactivity Unit on East Asian Patients Who Received Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: PTRG-DES Consortium

TCT-354 The Clinical Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score Combined With P2Y12 Reactivity Unit on East Asian Patients Who Received Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: PTRG-DES Consortium

Rationale and design of the PARTHENOPE trial: A two-by-two factorial comparison of polymer-free vs biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents and personalized vs standard duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in all-comers undergoing PCI

BackgroundOver the past few decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone significant advancements as a result of the combination of device-based and drug-based therapies. These iterations have led to the development of polymer-free drug-eluting stents. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding their clinical performance. Furthermore, while various risk scores have been proposed to determine the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), none of them have undergone prospective validation within the context of randomized trials. DesignThe PARTHENOPE trial is a phase IV, prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated, assessor-blind study being conducted at 14 centers in Italy (NCT04135989). It includes 2,107 all-comers patients with minimal exclusion criteria, randomly assigned in a 2-by-2 design to receive either the Cre8 amphilimus-eluting stent or the SYNERGY everolimus-eluting stent, along with either a personalized or standard duration of DAPT. Personalized DAPT duration is determined by the DAPT score, which accounts for both bleeding and ischemic risks. Patients with a DAPT score <2 (indicating higher bleeding than ischemic risk) receive DAPT for 3 or 6 months for chronic or acute coronary syndrome, respectively, while patients with a DAPT score ≥2 (indicating higher ischemic than bleeding risk) receive DAPT for 24 months. Patients in the standard DAPT group receive DAPT for 12 months. The trial aims to establish the noninferiority between stents with respect to a device-oriented composite end point of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically-driven target-lesion revascularization at 12 months after PCI. Additionally, the trial aims to demonstrate the superiority of personalized DAPT compared to a standard approach with respect to a net clinical composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or type 2 to 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria at 24-months after PCI. SummaryThe PARTHENOPE trial is the largest randomized trial investigating the efficacy and safety of a polymer-free DES with a reservoir technology for drug-release and the first trial evaluating a personalized duration of DAPT based on the DAPT score. The study results will provide novel insights into the optimizing the use of drug-eluting stents and DAPT in patients undergoing PCI.

Five-Year Prognostic Value of DAPT Score in Older Patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Large-Sample Study in the Real World.

The dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score is recommended for predicting the risk of ischemia and bleeding for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognostic value of the DAPT score in older PCI patients. This study enrolled 10,724 consecutive patients who underwent PCI from January 2013 to December 2013 in Fu Wai hospital, among whom 2,981 (27.8%) were aged ≥ 65 years. The ischemic endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and stroke). The bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. After a 5-year follow-up, 256 (12.0%) MACCEs and 53 (2.5%) BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding occurred. The patients were divided into two groups according to the DAPT score: the low-score (＜2, n=1,646) and high-score (≥ 2, n=485) group. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that the risk of MACCE was similar between the two groups [hazard ratio (HR): 1.214, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.916-1.609, P=0.178], whereas the risk of bleeding was significantly higher in the high-score group than in the low-score group (HR: 2.447, 95% CI: 1.407-4.257, P=0.002). The DAPT score did not show prognostic value in MACCE [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), 0.534; 95% CI: 0.496-0.572, P=0.079]; however, it demonstrated a certain prognostic value in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (AUROC, 0.646; 95% CI: 0.573-0.719, P＜0.001). This study suggested that in older PCI patients, the DAPT score did not show predictive value for MACCE; however, it had a certain predictive value for 5-year BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding.

Performance of DAPT Score and ESC Criteria for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

The values of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score in the stratification of ischemic risk were assessed in this study. A total of 489 patients with acute coronary syndrome who received DAPT at discharge between June 2020 and August 2020 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which included recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization, all-cause death, or ischemic stroke during a 27-month follow-up period. Patients with ESC-defined high-risk showed a significantly higher risk of MACE (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.78-4.25), all-cause death (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.14-5.43), and recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.57-4.99) than those with ESC-defined low/medium-risk during follow-up. The results of landmark analysis showed that patients in the high-risk group had a significantly higher risk of MACE (HR 2.80,95 CI% 1.57-4.97), recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization (HR 3.19,95 CI% 1.47-6.93) within one year, and a higher risk of MACE (HR 2.69,95 CI% 1.38-5.23) after one year. There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between patients with a DAPT score ≥2 and a DAPT score <2. The C-indices of ESC criteria and DAPT score for prediction of MACE were 0.63 (95% CI 0.57-0.70) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.48-0.61), respectively. The predictive value of ESC criteria for MACE was better than the DAPT score according to the DeLong test (z-statistic=2.30, P=0.020). Patients with ESC-defined high-risk had a higher risk of MACE compared to those with ESC-defined low/medium-risk. The discriminant ability of the ESC criteria was better than the DAPT score for MACE. The ESC criteria demonstrated moderate discriminatory capacity of MACE in ACS patients treated with DAPT.

Prediction of Bleeding by the PRECISE-DAPT Score in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenting

The predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and the subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score predicts the risk of bleeding in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Patients with carotid artery stenting (CAS) are also treated with DAPT. In this study, we aimed to investigate the performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score in predicting bleeding in patients with CAS. Patients who had CAS between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The PRECISE-DAPT score was calculated for each patient. The patients were divided into two groups based on their PRECISE-DAPT score: low < 25 and high ≥ 25. Bleeding and ischemia complications and laboratory data among the two groups were compared. A total of 120 patients with a mean age of 67.3 ± 9.7years were included. Forty-three patients had high PRECISE-DAPT scores, and 77 patients had low PRECISE-DAPT scores. Six patients developed bleeding events during the six-month follow-up, and five of them were in the PRECISE DAPT score ≥ 25 group. The difference between the two groups regarding bleeding events at six months was significant (P = 0.022). The PRECISE-DAPT score might be used for predicting the bleeding risk in patients with CAS, and the bleeding rate was significantly higher in patients with a PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 25.

Is the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) excessive in post-angioplasty in chronic coronary syndrome? Data from the France-PCI registry (2014-2019).

while the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following coronary angioplasty for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) recommended by the European Society of Cardiology has decreased over the last decade, little is known about the adherence to those guidelines in clinical practice in France. To analyze the real duration of DAPT post coronary angioplasty in CCS, as well as the factors affecting this duration. Between 2014 and 2019, 8.836 percutaneous coronary interventions for CCS from the France-PCI registry were evaluated, with 1 year follow up, after exclusion of patients receiving oral anticoagulants, procedures performed within one year of an acute coronary syndrome, and repeat angioplasty. Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) DAPT duration was > 12 months for 53.1% of patients treated for CCS; 30.5% had a DAPT between 7 and 12 months, and 16.4% a DAPT ≤ 6 months. Patients with L-DAPT (>12 months) were at higher ischemic risk [25.0% of DAPT score ≥2 vs. 18.8% DAPT score ≥2 in S&I-DAPT group (≤12 months)]. The most commonly used P2Y12 inhibitor was clopidogrel (82.2%). The prescription of ticagrelor increased over the period. post-PCI DAPT duration in CCS was higher than international recommendations in the France PCI registry between 2014 and 2019. More than half of the angioplasty performed for CCS are followed by a DAPT > 12 months. Ischemic risk assessment influences the duration of DAPT. This risk is probably overestimated nowadays, leading to a prolongation of DAPT beyond the recommended durations, thus increasing the bleeding risk.

746 DAL COMPASS AI DATI DI REAL LIFE: UNO STUDIO CASO-CONTROLLO

Abstract Background The COMPASS trial showed that rivaroxaban plus aspirin was associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular events, but more major bleeding events, as compared with aspirin alone in patients with chronic vascular disease. The clinical benefit was particularly favorable in high-risk subgroups, who are frequently undertreated because of the fear of severe bleeding events. Purpose Our aim is to evaluate objective effects of anticoagulation strategies with rivaroxaban among patients with stable cardiovascular disease. Methods We considered a population of patients with stable cardiovascular disease (coronary and/or peripheral artery disease) which has had dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 1 year. Between them we selected 65 patients (52 males and 13 females, mean age 59±7 years) with high risk of ischemic events and low bleeding risk. We used DAPT Score and HAS BLED Score to enroll patients. We stopped them DAPT and starting a dual therapy combining rivaroxaban 2,5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg. We excluded patients with high bleeding risk and heart failure with less than 35% ejection fraction. At baseline they underwent blood tests, transthoracic echocardiography, six minutes walking test (6MWT), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Score, evaluation of carotid– femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and ankle brachial index (ABI). We established 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Results At 3 months follow-up we evaluated 41 patients (the study is going on) repeating those exams and comparing them with the baseline ones. We observed that 35% of population had reduction of cf-PWV values and in 40% of population ABI increased. 15% of patients had also improvement of more than 100 meters in 6MWT. Particularly, reduction of cf-PWV and improvement of ABI values suggest that rivaroxaban 2,5 mg twice daily may have effects on vascular protection and arterial stiffness through different mechanisms such as improvement of endothelial functionality and fibrinolytic activity at endothelium, anti-inflammatory properties and platelet-dependent thrombin generation. Nevertheless none of the patients experienced subjective clinical improvement and the KCCQ Score was unmodified. This element indicates that patients at 3 months follow-up have imperceptible changes that can be documented only by diagnostic imaging evaluation and not by anamnestic data. Finally, an important evidence was that none of the patients at 3 months follow-up reported major bleeding events. Conclusion Preliminary data suggest that the addiction of rivaroxaban 2,5 mg to aspirin exerts vascular protection and its effects can be primarly documented by evaluation of cf-PWV and ABI. The 6MWT seems to play a minor role at 3 months assessment. The KCCQ may not be useful to fill in at 3 months follow-up because patients seem not to perceive subjective clinical improvement in this phase. If confirmed on a large cohort these results may give rivaroxaban a higher relevance not only for the power but also for the immediacy of its effects. Anyway, we are continuing our check to give our data more statistical significance and to test any role of the other parameters at 6 and 12 months follow-up.

Associations between DAPT score and long-term mortality post PCI

Abstract Introduction The dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score was developed to identify patients more likely to derive benefit (score ≥2) or harm (score &amp;lt;2) from DAPT beyond 1-year post PCI. There is no study which looked at the DAPT score and long term outcomes post PCI in Australia. Purpose We sought to examine long-term mortality after PCI by the DAPT score in patients treated with DAPT per local guidelines. Methods We examined data from the MIG PCI database from 2005 to 2018 in whom the DAPT score could be derived and grouped them as score ≥2 or &amp;lt;2. Long-term mortality was assessed from National Death Index linkage. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality examined using survival analysis. Secondary endpoints included 30-day ischaemic outcomes and in-hospital major bleeding. Results Out of 27,740 patients in the study, 9,401 (33.9%) had DAPT score ≥2. They were younger and included more females and higher prevalence of renal impairment. DAPT score ≥2 patients had higher in-hospital major bleeding, 30-day mortality, MI and target vessel revascularisation. DAPT score ≥2 patients had lower long-term survival to 12 years (p&amp;lt;0.001 for all). Conclusion A third of all-comer PCI patients had DAPT score ≥2 with greater short-term risk of ischaemic and bleeding outcomes, as well as long-term mortality. Theoretically, those with DAPT score ≥2 would benefit from longer duration of DAPT as ischaemic risk outweighs bleeding risk. However, given our finding of increased short-term bleeding risk and long-term mortality, dynamic bleeding risk assessment should be undertaken to guide pharmacotherapy strategies. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

The Clinical Value of the Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score in Predicting Long-Term Major Adverse Cardiovascular And Cerebrovascular Events and Major Bleeding in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The PRECISE-DAPT (predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy) score is recommended for predicting out-of-hospital bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its long-term prediction remains unclear. We investigated the performance of this score in predicting long-term outcomes in patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We divided retrospectively enrolled patients (n = 1071) into two groups according to their PRECISE-DAPT scores: low < 25 and high ≥ 25. Bleeding was assessed using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. The ischemic endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). During follow-up (median 7.3 years), MACCE (55 vs 35%, P<.001) and major bleeding (9 vs 4%, P = .002) rates were greater in the high score group. The PRECISE-DAPT score was an independent predictor of MACCE in multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.028, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.016-1.039, P < .001). Also, the PRECISE-DAPT score predicted all-cause mortality (HR: 2.115, 95% CI: 1.508-2.965, P < .001) at long-term follow-up. The PRECISE-DAPT score may be useful for predicting MACCE at long-term follow-up in addition to the risk of bleeding.

Performance of PRECISE-DAPT and Age-Bleeding-Organ Dysfunction Score for Predicting Bleeding Complication During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Chinese Elderly Patients.

BackgroundRecently, the Age–Bleeding–Organ Dysfunction (ABO) algorithm was recommended by the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Consensus as a binary approach to evaluate bleeding risk. This analysis made comparison of the predictive performances between the PRECISE-DAPT and ABO bleeding score in identifying the risk of 12-months major bleeding in Chinese elderly patients over 65 years old patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during dual-antiplatelet therapy period.MethodsA total of 2,037 elderly coronary artery disease (CAD) patients (≥65 years) receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI were enrolled in the study. The predictive accuracy of the two bleeding risk scores (PRECISE-DAPT and ABO) was compared for identifying the risk of bleeding during the dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients who underwent PCI. Major clinically relevant bleeding events were defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.ResultsThe PRECISE-DAPT score in the no bleeding, BARC = 1 bleeding, BARC ≥ 2 bleeding patients was 23.55 ± 10.46, 23.23 ± 10.03, and 33.54 ± 14.33 (p < 0.001), respectively. Meanwhile, the ABO score in the three groups was 0.72 ± 0.80, 0.69 ± 0.81, and 1.49 ± 0.99 (p < 0.001), respectively. The C-statistic of the PRECISE-DAPT model for prediction of BARC ≥ 2 bleeding in overall patients was 0.717 (95% CI, 0.656–0.777) and 0.720 (95% CI, 0.656–0.784) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Similar discriminatory capacity was demonstrated in the ABO risk score [overall, patients, AUC: 0.712 (95% CI, 0.650–0.774); ACS patients, AUC: 0.703 (95% CI, 0.634–0.772)]. No differences were observed when the ABO model was in comparison with the PRECISE-DAPT model, regardless in overall patients (z = −0.199, p = 0.842) or ACS patients (z = −0.605, p = 0.545). The calibration for BARC ≥ 2 bleeding of the PRECISE-DAPT and ABO score were acceptable, regardless in overall patients [goodness-of-fit (GOF) Chi-square = 0.432 and 0.001, respectively; p-value = 0.806 and 0.999, respectively] or ACS patients (GOF Chi-square = 0.008 and 0.580, respectively; p-value = 0.996 and 0.748, respectively).ConclusionNo matter of clinical presentation in Asian 65-years older patients with DAPT, the PRECISE-DAPT, and ABO scores had the similar discriminative ability for 12-months BARC ≥ 2 bleeding. Considering the simplicity and reliability, the PRECISE-DAPT score might be more clinically applicable in the overall population and ACS patients in bleeding prediction.

Prospective application of a bleeding and ischemic risks-adjusted antithrombotic protocol in elderly patients revascularized with everolimus-eluting stents: EPIC05-Sierra75 study.

OBJECTIVESElderly patients show a higher incidence of ischemic and bleeding events after percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to investigate outcomes in elderly patients treated with antithrombotic strategy guided by bleeding and ischemic risks after revascularization with last generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES).METHODSProspective multicenter registry including patients over 75 years revascularized with EES and antithrombotic therapy guided by clinical presentation, PCI complexity and PRECISE DAPT score. Co-primary safety endpoints were: (1) composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis and; (2) bleeding (BARC 2-5). Primary efficacy endpoint was target lesion revascularization. A matched group of patients revascularized with current drug-eluting stents and no such tailored antithrombotic therapy was used as control.RESULTSFinally, 1064 patients were included in SIERRA-75 cohort, 80.8 ± 4.2 years, 36.6% women, 71% acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and 53.6% complex PCI. Co-primary safety endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events was met in 6.2%, co-primary safety endpoint of bleeding in 7.8% and primary efficacy endpoint of TKLR in 1.5%. The multivariable adjusted model showed no significant association of the prescribed short/long dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) durations with any endpoint suggesting a well tailored therapy. No stent thrombosis reported in the subgroup with 1-3 months DAPT duration. As compared to control group, bleeding BARC 2-5 was significantly lower in SIERRA-75 group (7.4% vs. 10.2%, P = 0.04) as well as the net safety-efficacy endpoint (14.3% vs. 18.5%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONSIn elderly population, the application of this risks-adjusted antithrombotic protocol after revascularization with last generation EES seems to be associated with an improved prognosis in terms of ischemic and bleeding outcomes.

Incorporation of Laboratory Test Biomarkers Into Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score Improves Prediction of Ischemic and Bleeding Events in Post-percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients.

This study aimed to examine the performance of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score in two retrospective cohorts of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients and to explore whether incorporating additional biomarkers could further improve the predictive power of the DAPT score. In a retrospective derivation cohort of 4,798 PCI patients, the validity of DAPT score for stratifying ischemic/bleeding risks was explored. Then, the association between the baseline status of 54 laboratory test biomarkers and ischemic/bleeding events was revealed while adjusting for the DAPT score. Combinations of individual laboratory test biomarkers that were significantly associated with ischemic/bleeding events were explored to identify the ones that improved discrimination of ischemic and bleeding events when incorporated into DAPT score. Finally, the impact of the combination of biomarkers with DAPT score was validated in an independent retrospective validation cohort of 1,916 PCI patients. Patients with a high DAPT score (DAPT score ≥ 2) had significantly higher risk of ischemic events and significantly lower risk of bleeding than patients with a low DAPT score (DAPT score < 2). Moreover, the addition of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and red cell distribution width CV (RDW-CV) into the DAPT score further improved discrimination of ischemia and bleeding. Furthermore, the incremental predictive value of AST + RDW-CV maintained with measurements was updated at post-baseline time points. DAPT score successfully stratified the risks of ischemia/bleeding post PCI in the current cohorts. Incorporation of AST + RDW-CV into the DAPT score further improved prediction for both ischemic and bleeding events.

Untangling the difficult interplay between ischemic and hemorrhagic risk: The role of risk scores.

BACKGROUNDBleedings are an independent risk factor for subsequent mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This represents a hazard equivalent to or greater than that for recurrent ACS. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) represents the cornerstone in the secondary prevention of thrombotic events, but the benefit of such therapy is counteracted by the increased hemorrhagic complications. Therefore, an early and individualized patient risk stratification can help to identify high-risk patients who could benefit the most from intensive medical therapies while minimizing unnecessary treatment complications in low-risk patients. AIMTo review existing literature and gain better understanding of the role of ischemic and hemorrhagic risk scores in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). METHODSWe used a combination of terms potentially used in literature describing the most common ischemic and hemorrhagic risk scores to search in PubMed as well as references of full-length articles.RESULTSIn this review we briefly describe the most important ischemic and bleeding scores that can be adopted in patients with IHD, focusing on GRACE, CHA2DS2-Vasc, PARIS CTE, DAPT, CRUSADE, ACUITY, HAS-BLED, PARIS MB and PRECISE-DAPT score. In the second part of this review, we try to define a possible approach to the IHD patient, using the most suitable scores to stratify patient risk and decide the most appropriate patient treatment. CONCLUSIONIt becomes evident that risk scores by themselves can’t be the solution to balance the ischemic/bleeding risk of an IHD patient. Instead, some risk factors that are commonly associated with an elevated risk profile and that are already included in risk scores should be the focus of the clinician while he/she is taking care of a patient affected by IHD.

Impact of the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Score on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy.

BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score is used to stratify ischemic and bleeding risk for antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study assessed the association between the DAPT score and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who were treated with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.MethodsA total of 498 ACS patients, with early aspirin discontinuation for various reasons and who received P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after PCI, were enrolled during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. The efficacy and safety between those with low (<2) and high (≥2) DAPT scores were compared during a 12-month follow-up after PCI. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the covariates between the two groups. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization, and stroke within 12 months. The safety endpoint was major bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding.ResultsThe primary composite endpoint occurred in 11.56 and 14.38% of the low and high DAPT score groups, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the primary composite endpoint between the two groups in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, the risk of recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization was significantly higher in the high DAPT score group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.900, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.095–3.295). The safety outcome for BARC 3 or 5 bleeding was similar between the two groups.ConclusionsOur results indicate that ACS patients receiving P2Y12 monotherapy with high DAPT score had an increased risk of recurrent ACS or unplanned revascularization.