Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Group Research Articles

Ticagrelor monotherapy for acute coronary syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis of TICO and T-PASS trials.

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a potent P2Y12 inhibitor is recommended for 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Monotherapy with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor after short-term DAPT is an attractive option to better balance the risks of ischaemia and bleeding. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term DAPT, especially in patients with ACS. Electronic databases were searched from inception to 11 November 2023, and for the primary analysis, individual patient data were pooled from the relevant randomized clinical trials comparing ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term (≤3 months) DAPT with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT, exclusively in ACS patients undergoing DES implantation. The co-primary endpoints were ischaemic endpoint (composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and bleeding endpoint [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding] at 1 year. Individual patient data from two randomized clinical trials including 5906 ACS patients were analysed. At 1 year, the primary ischaemic endpoint did not differ between the ticagrelor monotherapy and ticagrelor-based DAPT groups [1.9% vs. 2.5%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.13; P = .194]. The incidence of the primary bleeding endpoint was lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy group (2.4% vs. 4.5%; adjusted HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.40-0.72; P < .001). The results were consistent in a secondary aggregate data meta-analysis including the ACS subgroup of additional randomized clinical trials which enrolled patients with ACS as well as chronic coronary syndrome. In ACS patients undergoing DES implantation, ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term DAPT was associated with less major bleeding without a concomitant increase in ischaemic events compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT. PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023476470).

P2Y12 monotherapy versus standard dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the recommended therapy for lowering the ischemic risk among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the increased incidence of bleeding is a major concern. Monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor after short-term DAPT to reduce adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding rates has not been fully established and remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to determine the effectiveness of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term DAPT in reducing cardiovascular and bleeding events. Methods A comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the use of short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy in patients with ACS who underwent PCI was conducted. Outcome measures for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and bleeding rates were analyzed using a random-effects model via Review Manager V5.4. Results A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 36,724 subjects were analyzed. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.78-1.02], I² = 0%, p = 0.10) and myocardial infarction (RR 1.00 [95% CI: 0.88-1.14], I² = 0%, p = 0.72) between the P2Y12 inhibitor group and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group. There was a lower rate of major bleeding in the P2Y12 group compared to the DAPT group (RR 0.65 [95% CI: 0.49-0.88], I² = 76%, p = 0.002). The major sources of substantial heterogeneity are due to different intervals of de-escalation and baseline risk factors prior to PCI in each study. Conclusion P2Y12 monotherapy has similar rates of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. However, early de-escalation leads to a lower incidence of bleeding. P2Y12 monotherapy showed a 35% decreased risk of bleeding compared to the DAPT strategy. This suggests that P2Y12 monotherapy is a preferable antiplatelet strategy in patients undergoing PCI, especially in the high-risk bleeding population.

Tracheostomy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Respiratory Failure.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by respiratory failure require antiplatelet regimens which often cannot be stopped and may increase bleeding from tracheostomy. However, there is limited available data on both the proportion of patients undergoing tracheostomy and the impact on antiplatelet regimens on outcomes. Utilizing the Vizient® Clinical Data Base, we identified patients ≥18 years admitted from 2015 to 2019 with a primary diagnosis of AMI and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We assessed for the incidence of patients undergoing tracheostomy, outcomes stratified by the timing of tracheostomy (≤10 vs >10 days), and the association between dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use and in-hospital mortality. We identified 26 435 patients presenting with AMI requiring IMV. The mean (SD) age was 66.8 (12.3) years and 33.4% were women. The incidence of tracheostomy was 6.0% (n = 1573), and the median IMV time to tracheostomy was 12 days, 55.6% of which underwent percutaneous and 44.4% underwent open tracheostomy. Over 90% (n = 1424) underwent tracheostomy (>10 days) and had a similar mortality when compared to early (≤10 days) tracheostomy (22.5% vs 22.8%, P = 0.94). On the day of tracheostomy, only 24.7% were given DAPT, which was associated with a lower mortality than those not on DAPT (17.4% vs 23.7%, P = 0.01). After multivariable adjustment, DAPT use on the day of tracheostomy remained associated with lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.94, P = 0.02). Tracheostomy complications were not different between groups (P > 0.05), but more patients in the DAPT group required post-tracheostomy blood transfusions (5.6% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Approximately 1 in 20 intubated AMI patients requires tracheostomy. The lack of DAPT interruption on the day of tracheostomy but not the timing of tracheostomy was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality. Our results suggest that DAPT should not be a barrier to tracheostomy for patients with AMI.

Comparison of Dual Antiplatelet Therapies for Minor, Nondisabling, Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) appears to be an effective treatment option for minor (nondisabling) acute ischemic stroke. This conclusion is based on trials that include both transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke; however, these 2 conditions may differ. To compare DAPT regimens specifically for minor stroke. PubMed was searched for randomized clinical trials published up to November 4, 2023. Search terms strategy included TIA, transient ischemic attack, minor stroke, or moderate stroke, with the filter randomized controlled trial. Unpublished data on minor stroke were sourced from authors and/or institutions. Trials testing DAPT within the first 24 hours of a minor stroke (defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5) were included by consensus. Of 1508 studies screened, 6 (0.3%) initially met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The study was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines by multiple observers. Bayesian fixed-effect network meta-analysis was conducted. Secondary analysis performed for high-risk TIA alone. Treatments were ranked using a probability measure called surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA). The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included major hemorrhage, mortality, and hemorrhagic stroke. The number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) were obtained. Five trials were included that described 28 148 patients, of whom 22 203 (78.9%) had a minor stroke. Of these, 13 995 (63.0%) were in DAPT groups and 8208 (37.0%) in aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) groups. Aspirin and ticagrelor had a 94% probability of being the superior treatment for minor stroke (SUCRA, 0.94) for the primary outcome. Both aspirin and ticagrelor (NNT, 40; 95% CI, 31-64) and aspirin and clopidogrel (NNT, 58; 95% CI, 39-136) were superior to aspirin alone in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke at 90 days. Both treatments had higher rates of major hemorrhage than aspirin alone (NNH for aspirin and ticagrelor, 284; 95% CI, 108-1715 vs NNH for aspirin and clopidogrel, 330; 95% CI, 118-3430), but neither had increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke or death. For high-risk TIA, ticagrelor and aspirin had a 60% probability (SUCRA, 0.60) and clopidogrel and aspirin had a 40% probability (SUCRA 0.40) of being a superior treatment; neither was optimum, but both were superior to aspirin alone for the primary outcome. These findings suggest that DAPT with aspirin and ticagrelor has higher probability of being the superior treatment among patients with minor stroke when presence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles has not been excluded. For patients with TIA, the superiority of aspirin and ticagrelor vs aspirin and clopidogrel was not demonstrated.

The impact of various antiplatelet strategies on the incidence of gouty arthritis in hospitalized patients with acute cerebral infarction

Objectives：1.To explore the incidence of concurrent gouty arthritis (GA) during hospitalization in patients with different subtypes of acute stroke.2.To investigate disparities in acute cerebral infarction patients with coexisting GA undergoing various antiplatelet strategies. Materials and methodsData from acute stroke patients admitted to the Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, from January 2019 to December 2021, underwent screening. The incidence of GA in acute stroke patients of various subtypes were analyzed. Subsequently, we divided cerebral infarction cases into three cohorts based on distinct antiplatelet therapies: the aspirin group, the dual antiplatelet therapy group (DAPT，aspirin plus clopidogrel), and the clopidogrel group. Investigate disparities in acute cerebral infarction patients with coexisting GA undergoing various antiplatelet strategies. ResultsA total of 12,381 patients with acute stroke were screened in this study. The incidence of GA in various subtypes of acute stroke was as follows: cerebral infarction (3.56%, n=9890), TIA (1.81%, n=443), cerebral haemorrhag (0.64%, n=1713), and SAH (0.30%, n=335). The incidence of GA in patients with ischemic stroke is higher than that of hemorrhagic stroke (χ2 =49.258, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of GA among three different antiplatelet therapy groups. But there was marginal statistical difference in the incidence of GA between the aspirin group and the DAPT group (P=0.051), as well as between the clopidogrel group and the DAPT group (P=0.059). ConclusionsThe incidence of GA in patients with ischemic stroke is higher than that of hemorrhagic stroke. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of GA in acute cerebral infarction across various antiplatelet Strategies. The marginal statistical difference in the incidence of GA between the single antiplatelet group and the DAPT group requires further investigation.

Single versus dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous left atrial appendage closure-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

In the last few years, percutaneous LAA occlusion (LAAO) has become a plausible alternative in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with contraindications to anticoagulation therapy. Nevertheless, the optimal antiplatelet strategy following percutaneous LAAO remains to be defined. Studies comparing single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following LAAO were systematically searched and screened. The outcomes of interest were ischemic stroke, device-related thrombus (DRT) and major bleeding. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed comparing outcomes in both groups. The moderator effect of baseline characteristics on outcomes was evaluated by univariate meta-regression analyses. Sixteen observational studies with 3255 patients treated with antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, n = 1033; DAPT, n = 2222) after LAAO were included. Mean age was 74.5 ± 8.3 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.3 ± 1.5 and 3.2 ± 1.0, respectively. At a weighted mean follow-up of 12.7 months, the occurrence of stroke (RR 1.33; 95% CI 0.64-2.77; p =.44), DRT (RR 1.52; 95% CI 0.90-2.58; p =.12), and the composite of stroke and DRT (RR 1.26; 95% CI 0.67-2.37; p =.47) did not differ significantly between SAPT and DAPT groups. The rate of major bleedings was also not different between groups (RR 1.41; 95% CI 0.64-3.12; p =.39). Among AF patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous LAAO, a post-procedural minimalistic antiplatelet strategy with SAPT did not significantly differ from DAPT regimens regarding the rate of stroke, DRT and major bleeding.

Dual antiplatelet therapy versus intravenous tissue plasminogen activator with acute minor ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy

ObjectivesTo compare the safety and efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) and Intravenous (IV) Tissue Plasminogen Activator (t-PA) in minor Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS). Materials and MethodsFollowing Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed observational studies and clinical trials comparing DAPT and IV t-PA in patients with minor AIS. Databases included PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Data extraction included study characteristics, patient demographics, and analyzed outcomes. RevMan 5.3 and OpenMetaAnalyst 2021 were used to analyze the data and assess heterogeneity, respectively. The risk of bias was determined using RoB 2.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. ResultsThis meta-analysis included five studies with 3,978 DAPT-treated patients and 2,224 IV t-PA-treated patients. We found no significant differences in achieving modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 0-1 (OR 1.11, 95 % CI: 0.79, 1.55, p = 0.56) and 0-2 (OR 0.90, 95 % CI: 0.61, 1.31, p = 0.57), as well as combined mRS scores (OR 1.05, 95 % CI: 0.82, 1.34, p = 0.72). Similarly, there were no significant disparities between the two treatment groups in NIHSS score change from baseline (MD 0.32, 95 % CI: -0.35, 0.98, p = 0.35) and in mortality rates (OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.26, 2.93, p = 0.83). Notably, in comparison to the IV t-PA group, the DAPT group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of bleeding (OR 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.14, 0.69, p = 0.004) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (OR 0.10, 95 % CI: 0.04, 0.26, p < 0.00001). ConclusionsOur meta-analysis found no significant differences in efficacy between DAPT and IV t-PA. However, DAPT demonstrated a significantly lower risk of sICH and bleeding compared with IV t-PA.

Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin vs Aspirin Alone in Patients With Acute Mild to Moderate Stroke

Dual antiplatelet therapy has been demonstrated to be superior to single antiplatelet in reducing recurrent stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack or minor stroke, but robust evidence for its effect in patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke is lacking. To evaluate whether dual antiplatelet therapy is superior to single antiplatelet among patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke. This was a multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, randomized clinical trial conducted at 66 hospitals in China from December 20, 2016, through August 9, 2022. The date of final follow-up was October 30, 2022. The analysis was reported on March 12, 2023. Of 3065 patients with ischemic stroke, 3000 patients with acute mild to moderate stroke within 48 hours of symptom onset were enrolled, after excluding 65 patients who did not meet eligibility criteria or had no randomization outcome. Within 48 hours after symptom onset, patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 1541) or aspirin alone (n = 1459) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as an increase of 2 or more points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, but not as a result of cerebral hemorrhage, compared with baseline. The superiority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was assessed based on a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomized participants with at least 1 efficacy evaluation regardless of treatment allocation. Bleeding events were safety end points. Of the 3000 randomized patients, 1942 (64.6%) were men, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (10.6) years, median (IQR) NIHSS score at admission was 5 (4-6), and 1830 (61.0%) had a stroke of undetermined cause. A total of 2915 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Early neurologic deterioration occurred in 72 of 1502 (4.8%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group vs 95 of 1413 (6.7%) in the aspirin alone group (risk difference -1.9%; 95% CI, -3.6 to -0.2; P = .03). Similar bleeding events were found between 2 groups. Among Chinese patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke, clopidogrel plus aspirin was superior to aspirin alone with regard to reducing early neurologic deterioration at 7 days with similar safety profile. These findings indicate that dual antiplatelet therapy may be a superior choice to aspirin alone in treating patients with acute mild to moderate stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869009.

The effect of argatroban on early neurological deterioration and outcomes in minor ischemic stroke: preliminary findings.

Minor ischemic stroke (MIS) is associated with early neurological deterioration (END) and poor prognosis. Here, we investigated whether argatroban administration can mitigate MIS-associated END and improve functional outcomes by monitoring activated partial thrombin time (APTT). Data were collected for patients with MIS admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022. Patients were divided into a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group (aspirin + clopidogrel) and an argatroban group (aspirin + argatroban). Those in the latter group who achieved a target APTT of 1.5-3-fold that of baseline and <100 s at 2 h after argatroban infusion were included in the argatroban subgroup. The primary outcome was the END rate of the DAPT group versus that of the argatroban group or the argatroban subgroup. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 7 and 90 days. In addition, baseline date were compared between patients with and without END in the argatroban group. 363 patients were included in the DAPT group and 270 in the argatroban group. There were no significant differences in any above outcome between them. 207 pairs were included in the DAPT group and the argatroban subgroup after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Significant differences were observed in the proportion of END (OR, 2.337; 95% CI, 1.200-4.550, p = 0.011) and mRS 0-2 at 7 days (OR, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.415-0.939, p = 0.023), but not in mRS 0-2 at 90 days or the hemorrhagic events between the two groups. In the argatroban group, univariate analysis showed that the rate of diabetes (OR, 2.316; 95% CI, 1.107-4.482, p = 0.023), initial random blood glucose (OR, 1.235; 95% CI, 1.070-1.425, p = 0.004), drinking history (OR, 0.445; 95% CI, 0.210-0.940, p = 0.031) or those reaching the target APTT (OR, 0.418; 95% CI, 0.184-0.949, p = 0.033) was significantly different among patients with and without END. However, there were no statistical differences in these parameters between them following multivariate analysis. In patients with MIS, argatroban administration and reaching the target APTT can reduce the incidence of END and improve short-term functional prognosis.

Prasugrel Single Antiplatelet Therapy versus Aspirin and Clopidogrel Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Flow Diverter Treatment for Cerebral Aneurysms: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

The optimal antiplatelet regimen after flow diverter treatment of cerebral aneurysms is still a matter of debate. A single antiplatelet therapy might be advantageous in determined clinical scenarios. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin and clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy. We performed a post hoc analysis of 4 retrospective multicenter studies including ruptured and unruptured aneurysms treated with flow diversion using either prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy or dual antiplatelet therapy. Primary end points were the occurrence of any kind of procedure- or device-related thromboembolic complications and complete aneurysm occlusion at the latest radiologic follow-up (mean, 18 months). Dichotomized comparisons of outcomes were performed between single antiplatelet therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, the influence of various patient- and aneurysm-related variables on the occurrence of thromboembolic complications was investigated using multivariable backward logistic regression. A total of 222 patients with 251 aneurysms were included, 90 (40.5%) in the single antiplatelet therapy and 132 (59.5%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. The primary outcome-procedure- or device-related thromboembolic complications-occurred in 6 patients (6.6%) of the single antiplatelet therapy and in 12 patients (9.0%) of the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .62; OR, 0.712; 95% CI, 0.260-1.930). The primary treatment efficacy end point was reached in 82 patients (80.4%) of the single antiplatelet therapy and in 115 patients (78.2%) of the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .752; OR, 1.141; 95% CI, 0.599-2.101). Logistic regression showed that non-surface-modified flow diverters (P = .014) and fusiform aneurysm morphology (P = .004) significantly increased the probability of thromboembolic complications. Prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy after flow diverter treatment may be as safe and effective as dual antiplatelet therapy and could, therefore, be a valid alternative in selected patients. Further prospective comparative studies are required to validate our findings.

Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Without Revascularization: China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Study

At least 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is one of the standards of care following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, study on prolonged DAPT for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients without revascularization is limited. We studied 1744 AMI patients without revascularization from the China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry between January 2013 and September 2014. These patients were on DAPT and did not experience AMI, stroke, or bleeding events at 12-month follow-up. We divided them into two groups: 12-month DAPT group (DAPT for at least 12 months but less than 18 months) and 18-month DAPT group (DAPT for at least 18 months). The primary outcome is 24-month all-cause death. Overall, 1221 (70.0%) patients took DAPT for ≥12 months but <18 months, while 523 (30.0%) patients took DAPT for ≥18 months. The two groups had comparable proportions with high ischemic risk (27.0% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.5418), as well as high bleeding risk (29.0% vs. 28.5%, P = 0.8316). At 24 months, the all-cause mortality rate of 18-month DAPT group was significantly lower than that for 12-month DAPT group (3.7% vs 5.9%, P = 0.0471). Adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause death also showed statistical significance (0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-0.99, P = 0.0444). In conclusion, DAPT for at least 18 months appears to be associated with lower 24-month mortality for non-revascularization AMI patients without events within 12 months after onset.

Perioperative complications of arteriovenous tirofiban administration versus oral dual antiplatelet therapy for stent-assisted embolization treated aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective, controlled cohort analysis.

Major perioperative complications of stent-assisted embolization treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients include the formation of thromboembolic events (TEs) and hemorrhagic events (HEs), for which antiplatelet protocols play a key role. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to compare the differences between arteriovenous tirofiban administration with traditional oral dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). A total of 417 consecutive patients were enrolled. General clinical characteristics, as well as the perioperative ischemic and hemorrhagic events, were retracted in digital documents. Logistic regression was conducted to identify both risk and protective factors of perioperative TEs and HEs. Perioperative TEs occurred in 21 patients, with an overall perioperative TEs rate of approximately 5.04%; among these patients, the incidence of perioperative TEs in the tirofiban group was less than that in the DAPT group. Additionally, 66 patients developed perioperative HEs, with an incidence of approximately 15.83%; among these patients, the incidence of perioperative HEs was less than that in the DAPT group. No significant differences were seen between the two groups in terms of the mRS score at the time of discharge. This study indicated that an improved perioperative antiplatelet drug tirofiban was an independent protective factor for perioperative TEs in stent-assisted embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms, but it did not impart an elevated risk of perioperative HEs and had no significant effects on the near-term prognosis of the patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is a standard therapy in patients with ischemic vascular diseases (IVD) including coronary artery, cerebrovascular and peripheral arterial diseases, although the optimal duration of this treatment is still debated. Previous meta-analyses reported conflicting results about the effects of long-term and short-term as well as non-DAPT use in various clinical settings. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of different durations of DAPT. We reviewed relevant articles and references from database, which were published prior to April 2023. Data from prospective studies were processed using RevMan5.0 software, provided by Cochrane Collaboration and transformed using relevant formulas. The inclusion criteria involved randomization to long-term versus short-term or no DAPT; the endpoints included at least one of total or cardiovascular (CV) mortalities, IVD recurrence, and bleeding. A total of 34 randomized studies involving 141 455 patients were finally included. In comparison with no or short-term DAPT, long-term DAPT reduced MI and stroke, but did not reduce the total and CV mortalities. Meanwhile, bleeding events were increased, even though intracranial and fatal bleedings were not affected. Besides, the reduction of MI and stroke recurrence showed no statistical significance between long-term and short-term DAPT groups. Long-term DAPT may not reduce the mortality of IVD besides increasing bleeding events, although reduced the incidences of MI and stroke early recurrence to a certain extent and did not increase the risk of fatal intracranial bleeding.

Cilostazol addition to aspirin may worsen the short-term outcome in patients with large artery disease: ADS subanalysis

Our previous acute dual study (ADS) reported that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol and aspirin did not reduce the rate of neurological deterioration in non-cardioembolic stroke patients. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated whether the impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may depend on neurological severity, as represented by large artery disease. Neurological deterioration was defined as neurological progression with an increment of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥2. NIHSS score subgroups were divided into that of 0-1, 2-4, 5-10, and >10. Among 1014 patients, 203 (20%) had the large artery disease, and 811 (80%) did not. In the total cohort, the rate of neurological deterioration was 10.8% in the DAPT group and 8.3% in the aspirin group (P=0.197). When we focused on the large artery disease group, DAPT group had a higher rate of neurological deterioration as 18.3% compared to 8.2% in the aspirin group (P=0.036). Among patients with NIHSS score of 0-1 and 2-4, the rates of neurological deterioration were not different between the two group (both, P=1.000). However, when NIHSS score elevated to 5-10, 45% in the DAPT group and 9.1% in the aspirin group deteriorated (P=0.013). Among the patients with NIHSS score of >10, 60% in the DAPT group and none (0%) in the aspirin group had the neurological deterioration (P=0.045). DAPT with aspirin and cilostazol was associated with higher rate of neurological deterioration when patients have large artery disease and not mild neurological deficits.

Low- or standard-dose edoxaban versus antiplatelet therapy for leaflet thrombus and cerebral thromboembolism after TAVR: A prespecified analysis of randomized ADAPT-TAVR trial

The risks of leaflet thrombosis and the associated cerebral thromboembolism are unknown according to different anticoagulation dosing after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim was to evaluate the incidence of leaflet thrombosis and cerebral thromboembolism between low-dose (30 mg) or standard-dose (60 mg) edoxaban and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after TAVR. In this prespecified subgroup analysis of the ADAPT-TAVR trial, the primary endpoint was the incidence of leaflet thrombosis on 4-dimensional computed tomography at 6-months. Key secondary endpoints were new cerebral lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging and neurological and neurocognitive dysfunction. Of 229 patients enrolled in this study, 118 patients were DAPT group and 111 were edoxaban group (43 [39.1%] 60 mg vs 68 [61.3%] 30 mg). There was a significantly lower incidence of leaflet thrombosis in the standard-dose edoxaban group than in the DAPT group (2.4% vs 18.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.55; P=.03). However, no significant difference was observed between low-dose edoxaban and DAPT (15.0% vs 18.3%; OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.32-1.81; P=.58). Irrespective of different antithrombotic regiments, the percentages of patients with new cerebral lesions on brain MRI and worsening neurological or neurocognitive function were not significantly different. In patients without an indication for anticoagulation after TAVR, the incidence of leaflet thrombosis was significantly lower with standard-dose edoxaban but not with low-dose edoxaban, as compared with DAPT. However, this differential effect of edoxaban on leaflet thrombosis was not associated with a reduction of new cerebral thromboembolism and neurological dysfunction.

Efficiency and safety of dual pathway inhibition for the prevention of femoropopliteal artery restenosis in repeated endovascular interventions

ObjectiveThere is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal strategy for evaluating the efficiency and safety of dual-pathway inhibition (DPI) in preventing femoropopliteal restenosis in patients undergoing repeated endovascular interventions. Despite several therapeutic interventions available for preventing femoropopliteal restenosis post repeated endovascular interventions, the ideal strategy, particularly evaluating the efficacy and safety of DPI, remains a matter of debate. MethodsFrom January 2015 to September 2021, patients who underwent repeated endovascular interventions for femoropopliteal restenosis were compared with those who underwent DPI or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after surgery using a propensity score-matched analysis. The primary outcome was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The principal safety outcome was a composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. To further enhance the rigor, Kaplan-Meier plots, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and sensitivity analyses, as well as subgroup analyses were employed, reducing potential confounders. ResultsA total of 441 patients were included in our study, of whom 294 (66.7%) received DAPT and 147 (33.1%) received DPI, with 114 matched pairs (mean age, 72.21 years; 84.2% male). Cumulative probability of CD-TLR at 36 months in the DPI group (17%) trended lower than that in the DAPT group (32%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.78; P =.004). The cumulative probability of freedom from CD-TLR at 36 months in the DPI group was 83%. No significant difference was observed in the composite outcome of major or CRNM bleeding between the DPI and DAPT groups (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.34 to 4.69; P = .730). The DPI group was associated with significantly lower rates of CD-TLR in the main subgroup analyses of diabetes (P = .001), previous smoking history (P = .008), longer lesion length (>10 cm) (P = .003), and treatment with debulking strategy (P = .003). ConclusionsIn our investigation focused on CD-TLR, we found that DPI exhibited a significant reduction in the risk of reintervention compared with other treatment modalities. This underscores the potential of DPI as a viable therapeutic strategy in preventing reinterventions. Moreover, our assessment of safety outcomes revealed that the bleeding risks associated with DPI were on par with DAPT, thereby not compromising patient safety. These findings pave the way for potential broader clinical implications, emphasizing the effectiveness and safety of DPI in the context of reducing reintervention risks.

Dual pathway inhibitor therapy switched from dual antiplatelet therapy reduces risk of recurrent in-stent occlusion after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal in-stent occlusion

Abstract Background Femoropopliteal (FP) in-stent occlusion (ISO), which increases the risk of repetition of reintervention and worsens the limb prognosis, is substantially encountered in clinical setting.1,2 Although previous study demonstrated that dual pathway inhibitor therapy (DPIT) reduced major adverse cardiovascular and limb events, whether this would be effective as anti-thrombotic therapy after endovascular therapy (EVT) for FP-ISO.3 Purpose To investigate whether DPIT reduces a risk of recurrent ISO after EVT for FP-ISO. Methods We retrospectively studied 117 limbs (chronic limb-threatening ischemia: 52%, chronic total occlusion: 74%) in 110 symptomatic patients with lower extremity arterial disease (male: 55%, diabetes mellitus: 49%) due to FP-ISO between August 2012 and October 2021. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who were switched from dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to DPIT with those who continued DAPT (DPIT group: 25 limbs in 25 patients, DAPT group: 92 limbs in 85 patients) after FP-ISO revascularization. The outcome measures were recurrent ISO and bleeding complications defined as the bleeding academic research criteria (BARC) and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify prognostic factor of recurrent ISO. Results The 1-year cumulative incidence of recurrent ISO was significantly lower in DPIT group. (24.0±9.4% vs. 54.1±5.8%, p=0.037, Figure 1). The 1-year cumulative incidence of bleeding complications were similar between two groups (BRAC 3 or 5 bleeding: 4.2% vs. 2.4%, p=0.63), ISTH major bleeding: 12.6% vs. 11.4%, p=0.86) (Figure 2). Multivariate analysis revealed that DPIT group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.13-0.86, P=0.004) significantly associated with a reduced risk of recurrent ISO, whereas higher age (HR: 1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.09, P=0.006) and poor BTK run-off (HR: 4.77, 95%CI 1.76-12.91, P=0.002) were significantly associated with an increased risk. Conclusion Switching from DAPT to DPIT after EVT for FP-ISO reduced the risk of recurrent ISO without increasing the risk of bleeding, while higher age and poor BTK run-off increased the risk of recurrent ISO.Figure 1Figure 2

Abstract 13589: Prophylactic Anticoagulation to Prevent Left Ventricular Thrombus Following Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) complicates an estimated 12% of anterior STEMI. The current standard of care for STEMI patients includes primary PCI and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Guidelines from the American Heart Association recommend consideration of prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent LVT in select high-risk patients following STEMI. These guidelines have a low certainty of evidence (level C), with most studies published prior to the current era of primary PCI and DAPT. Therefore, an updated review is needed in this area. Methods: Electronic databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL were systematically searched from January 2012 to June 2022. We included primary studies that used PCI as the lone revascularization strategy for STEMI. Studies were included if they compared the incidence of LVT in patients receiving prophylactic anticoagulation and DAPT with those receiving DAPT alone. Results: 7,378 studies were screened, with 4 studies eventually included in this review. One study was a randomized control trial and three were retrospective cohort studies. Pooled analysis using a fixed-effects model showed LVT was significantly less common in the triple therapy (TT) group compared to the DAPT group (OR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.17-0.86; p = 0.02). However, using a random-effects model, there was no significant difference in LVT between the TT and DAPT group (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.04-4.67; p = 0.33). Conclusions: Based on the current state of knowledge, there is no compelling evidence to either support or oppose prophylactic anticoagulation in STEMI. An appropriately powered clinical trial is warranted due to the need for more robust data in this area.

Aortic arch atheroma and stroke recurrence in mild stroke patients: ADS post-hoc analysis

BackgroundAortic arch atheroma is one of the embolic sources in patients with ischemic stroke. Although transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is the golden standard to evaluate the aortic arch atheroma, it is invasive and may be limited to patients with suspected embolism. Present post-hoc analysis evaluated the acute dual study data on mild stroke patients who had aortic arch atheroma proven by TEE and evaluate whether combined cilostazol and aspirin therapy might reduce the rate of stroke recurrence comparing aspirin therapy. MethodsAortic arch atheroma was defined as aortic arch plaque with a maximal intima-medial thickness of ≥4.0 mm. Stroke recurrence included new diffusion-weighted image (DWI) lesions within 14 days. ResultAmong 316 (227 [72%] men; median, 66 [interquartile, 60–76] years old) patients, TEE found that 93 patients (29%) had the aortic arch atheroma, and 223 (71%) did not had it. The aortic arch atheroma group was older (P = 0.001) and accompanied with diabetes mellitus (P = 0.003), dyslipidemia (P = 0.046), smoking (P = 0.034), and had previous ischemic stroke history (P = 0.042) and multiple infarcts (P = 0.024) on admission. During hospitalization, new DWI lesion was frequently observed in the aortic arch atheroma group compared to the group without it (14.1% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.049). The rates of new DWI lesion were not different between dual antiplatelet therapy group and aspirin group (14.9% vs. 13.3%, P = 1.000). ConclusionAortic arch atheroma was the representative of systematic arteriosclerosis associated with new DWI lesion in short-term. Combined antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol did not prevent new DWI appearance comparing aspirin therapy in this cohort.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration After Multivessel Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

There is a scarcity of data evaluating contemporary real-world dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and Results: In the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort enrolling 982 patients undergoing multivessel PCI, including left anterior descending coronary artery using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), we conducted 90-day landmark analyses to compare shorter and longer DAPT. DAPT discontinuation was defined as withdrawal of P2Y12inhibitors or aspirin for at least 2 months. The prevalence of acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium were 14.2% and 52.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of DAPT discontinuation was 22.6% at 90 days, and 68.8% at 1 year. In the 90-day landmark analyses, there were no differences in the incidences of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization (5.9% vs. 9.2%, log-rank P=0.12; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-1.08; P=0.09) and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding (1.4% vs. 1.9%, log-rank P=0.62) between the off- and on-DAPT groups at 90 days. The adoption of short DAPT duration was still low in this trial conducted after the release of the STOPDAPT-2 trial results. The 1-year incidence of cardiovascular events was not different between the shorter and longer DAPT groups, suggesting no apparent benefit of prolonged DAPT in reducing cardiovascular events even in patients who undergo multivessel PCI.