Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation Research Articles

Falta de adherencia a ticagrelor frente a clopidogrel y riesgo de eventos en pacientes con SCA. Resultados del registro CREA-ARIAM

Introduction and objectivesPrior studies have not determined whether the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation on the subsequent risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) varies by the choice of P2Y12-inhibitor after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). MethodsWe performed a prespecified subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective registry of ACS patients discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel between 2015 and2019. Nonadherence to DAPT was categorized as physician-guided discontinuation and disruption due to adverse effects, nonadherence, or bleeding. The association between DAPT cessation and 1-year MACE was analyzed using multivariate time-updated Cox models with inverse probability of censoring weighted estimators. ResultsOut of 2180 patients, 174 (8.3%) prematurely discontinued DAPT (physician-guided, n=126; disruption, n=48). Nonadherent patients were older and had more comorbidities than those on DAPT. Compared with physician-guided discontinuation, disruption occurred earlier after discharge and was more frequent with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel. In time-varying analysis, DAPT cessation was associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR, 1.32, 95%CI, 1.10-1.76), largely driven by disruption (adjusted HR, 1.47, 95%CI, 1.22-1.73). There was an exponential increase in MACE risk after DAPT cessation within 90 days after ACS, especially after disruption of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (Pinteraction<.001). After adjustment for DAPT duration, this interaction was not statistically significant on the additive scale (relative excess risk due to interaction 0.12, 95%CI,−0.99-1.24). ConclusionsIn this all-comers registry, 1 in 12 patients prematurely discontinued DAPT within 1 year after ACS. Compared with physician-recommended discontinuation, disruption resulted in a significantly higher risk of MACE. After adjustment for DAPT duration, this association was not moderated by the choice of P2Y12-inhibitor.Clinical trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02500290)

Nonadherence to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel and clinical outcomes in patients with ACS. Results from the CREA-ARIAM registry

Introduction and objectivesPrior studies have not determined whether the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation on the subsequent risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) varies by the choice of P2Y12-inhibitor after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). MethodsWe performed a prespecified subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective registry of ACS patients discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel between 2015 and2019. Nonadherence to DAPT was categorized as physician-guided discontinuation and disruption due to adverse effects, nonadherence, or bleeding. The association between DAPT cessation and 1-year MACE was analyzed using multivariate time-updated Cox models with inverse probability of censoring weighted estimators. ResultsOut of 2180 patients, 174 (8.3%) prematurely discontinued DAPT (physician-guided, n=126; disruption, n=48). Nonadherent patients were older and had more comorbidities than those on DAPT. Compared with physician-guided discontinuation, disruption occurred earlier after discharge and was more frequent with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel. In time-varying analysis, DAPT cessation was associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR, 1.32, 95%CI, 1.10-1.76), largely driven by disruption (adjusted HR, 1.47, 95%CI, 1.22-1.73). There was an exponential increase in MACE risk after DAPT cessation within 90 days after ACS, especially after disruption of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (Pinteraction<.001). After adjustment for DAPT duration, this interaction was not statistically significant on the additive scale (relative excess risk due to interaction 0.12, 95%CI,−0.99-1.24). ConclusionsIn this all-comers registry, 1 in 12 patients prematurely discontinued DAPT within 1 year after ACS. Compared with physician-recommended discontinuation, disruption resulted in a significantly higher risk of MACE. After adjustment for DAPT duration, this association was not moderated by the choice of P2Y12-inhibitor.Clinical trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02500290)

Platelet P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Emerging Option for Antiplatelet Therapy De-escalation

Antiplatelet therapy is considered essential for secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease. After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), temporary dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), a combination consisting of aspirin and an oral P2Y12 receptor blocker, is recommended. In the long term, this strategy results in more bleeding than antiplatelet therapy with aspirin alone. Therefore, to reduce bleeding, an increasing trend has been to keep DAPT as short as clinically acceptable, after which aspirin monotherapy is continued. Another option to diminish bleeding is to discontinue aspirin at the moment of DAPT cessation after PCI, and to continue on P2Y12 blocker monotherapy. This survey reviews the evidence on P2Y12 blocker monotherapy. Some clinical guidance will be provided on when and in whom P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy may be applied after DAPT cessation following PCI.

Safety and efficacy of interrupting dual antiplatelet therapy one month following percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Very short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has recently attracted a lot of attention with the introduction of newer generations stents. This is appealing, especially in patients at high bleeding risk. However, none of the trials were powered for the individual ischemic and bleeding endpoints. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating one-month versus routine duration of DAPT in patients undergoing PCI and reporting outcomes from the time of cessation of DAPT (1 month) to 1 year were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with the random-effects model using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Four RCTs involving 26,576 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Cessation of DAPT after 1 month was associated with significantly less major bleeding [RR 0.70, 95%CI (0.51–0.95), P = 0.02, heterogeneity (I2) = 42%]. There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality [RR 0.84 (95%CI 0.69–1.03), P = 0.10, I2 = 0%] and stroke [RR 0.71 (95%CI 0.45–1.13), P = 0.15, I2 = 42%] when compared to routine duration of DAPT. There was also no difference in myocardial infarction (MI) [RR 1.12 (95%CI 0.91–1.39), P = 0.28, I2 = 0%], and definite or probable stent thrombosis [RR 1.49 (95%CI 0.92–2.41), P = 0.11, I2 = 0%] with cessation of DAPT after 1 month. Cessation of DAPT 1 month after PCI was associated with significantly less major bleeding, but there was no difference in the rate of all-cause mortality, stroke, MI and stent thrombosis.

Prognosis impact of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel based DAPT discontinuation after acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the multicenter CREA ARIAM Andalucia registry

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): The study project was financially supported by a non-conditional grant by Astrazeneca. Background/Introduction Premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) Purpose To assess the relationship between premature DAPT discontinuation versus therapy continuation and outcomes in ACS patients discharged on ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Methods Prospective, observational, multicentre all-comers registry of ACS patients who were intended to receive 12-month DAPT with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Adherence was defined by the medication possession ratio metric (MPA, proportion of days of medication supply within a time interval). Categories for DAPT cessation included: physician-recommended discontinuation, brief interruption (invasive procedures), or disruption due to non-compliance or because of bleeding. Fully-adjusted Cox models with time-varying covariates to account for informative censoring, were used to examine the effect of DAPT cessation on MACE (a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or target-lesion revascularization). Moderation analysis was also performed to assess for potential exposure-adherence interaction. Results Among 2070 patients included (mean age 63 years, 73% men), 150 (7.3%) prematurely discontinued DAPT, median (IQR) 214 (101-236) days. Significantly more clopidogrel than ticagrelor users discontinued medication (9.5% vs 5%, respectively; P = .001), though timing of cessation was similar in both groups. At 1 year, MPR was slightly higher, but not significantly different, in the clopidogrel group than in the ticagrelor group (70±30 vs 64±29; P = .06). Overall, physician-guided discontinuation and bleeding were the main reasons for DAPT cessation. These were observed with a similar rate in both groups, while non-compliant disruption was more common among ticagrelor- than clopidogrel-treated patients (8% vs 2%, respectively; P for trend .04). After adjustments, DAPT cessation was associated with significantly increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR 2.94; 95% CI 1.82 – 4.74; P &amp;lt; .0001), regardless of the P2Y12 inhibitor (P interaction = 0.665). Non-compliance related cessation resulted in higher risk of MACE (HR 6.04, 95%CI 2.15 – 16.95; P = .001). Conclusion(s) Overall, approximately 7% of patients discontinued DAPT. Early cessation of either ticagrelor- or clopidogrel-based DAPT portended to a near 3-fold increased risk of MACE. Disruption due to non-compliance resulted in higher risk for ischemic events. These data warrant efforts to focus on patient education in subgroups at high risk of non-compliance.

Evaluation of the duration of dual‐antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective audit on the compliance with guidelines or cardiologist recommendation

AbstractIntroductionClinical guidelines define 12 months or less of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as standard therapy post‐percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients taking DAPT post‐PCI for the appropriate duration recommended by guidelines or the treating cardiologist at a large tertiary hospital in Brisbane.MethodsA total of 105 patients, who were first admitted to Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH) for PCI and were subsequently readmitted at least 12 months later, were audited. The appropriateness of continuation or cessation of DAPT was determined by comparing actual duration with the duration planned by the cardiologist and the duration recommended by clinical guidelines.ResultsSixty‐six percent (n = 70) of patients were found to be still taking DAPT on readmission. DAPT duration for 32% (n = 34) patients was compliant with the recommendations of guidelines or treating cardiologist, with 10% (n = 11) and 57% (n = 60) being shorter and longer than recommendations of guidelines or treating cardiologist respectively.ConclusionUnwarranted extended use of DAPT is highly prevalent at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, and places patients at risk of bleeding complications.

Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patient Undergoing Pericardiostomy due to Large Pericardial Effusion: A Case Report

Background : Stent thrombosis is a serious complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to avoid it. Surgery, on the other hand, is a common cause for stopping DAPT. Because patients were exposed to the possibility of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) when DAPT was stopped, this circumstance poses a clinical dilemma. Objective : This case report aimed to describe the management of antithrombotic therapy in post PCI patient requiring DAPT who underwent pericardiostomy. Case : A 69-year-old woman with large pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade, breast cancer on chemo- therapy, heart failure stage C NYHA functional class II, chronic coronary syndrome post-DES implantation at proximal-mid LAD, and hypertension. The patient underwent pericardiotomy procedures five days after DAPT discontinuation. For the bridging therapy, continuous UFH administration was initiated at a dose of 18 IU/kg/hour after the cessation of DAPT. The UFH dose was adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) 1.5 to 2.0 times the control value. The UFH was discontinued 6 hours before surgery. After surgery, UFH infusion was restarted 6 hours after the confirmation of hemostasis. The administration of UFH then continued until three days after DAPT was restarted. No complications were found during and after the pericar- diostomy. Conclusion : We reported an antithrombotic treatment strategy in a post PCI patient undergoing pericardiostomy with discontinuation of DAPT, which was successfully treated with UFH without any complication. The UFH has been widely used in perioperative settings as a bridging therapy during the interruption of DAPT and may be considered in this condition.

Abstract MP19: New Insight Into The Optimal Duration Of DAPT Following PCI In High-risk Twilight-like Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Introduction: Recent emphasis on shorter DAPT regimen after PCI irrespective of indication for PCI may fail to account for the substantial residual risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in ACS patients. We aim to determine the association of extended-term (&gt;12-month) vs. short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ischemic and hemorrhagic events in high-risk "TWILIGHT-like" patients undergoing PCI for ACS in clinical practice. Methods: All consecutive patients fulfilling the "TWILIGHT-like" criteria undergoing PCI were identified from the prospective Fuwai PCI Registry. High-risk patients (n=5,404) were defined by at least 1 clinical and 1 angiographic feature based on TWILIGHT trial selection criteria. The primary ischemic endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 months, composed of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke while BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was key secondary outcome. Results: The proportion of patients with 1-3, 4-5, or 6-9 risk factors was 19.7%, 58.6%, and 21.6%, respectively. Cessation of DAPT was less frequent in patients with ACS at 12 months (31.6% versus 68.4%), with 22.7% of ACS patients still on DAPT beyond 24 months. Of 4,875 high-risk ACS patients who remained event-free at 12 months after PCI, DAPT&gt;12-month compared with shorter DAPT reduced the primary ischemic endpoint by 63% (1.5% vs. 3.8%; HRadj: 0.374, 95% CI: 0.256 to 0.548; HRmatched: 0.361, 95% CI: 0.221-0.590). The HR for cardiovascular death was 0.049 (0.007 to 0.362) and that for MI 0.45 (0.153 to 1.320) and definite/probable stent thrombosis 0.296 (0.080-1.095) in propensity-matched analyses. Rates of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (0.9% vs. 1.3%; HRadj: 0.668 [0.379 to 1.178]; HRmatched: 0.721 [0.369-1.410]) did not differ significantly between two groups. Conclusions: Among high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI, long-term DAPT, compared with shorter DAPT, reduced ischemic events without a concomitant increase in clinically meaning bleeding events, suggesting that long-term DAPT can be considered in patients with ACS following PCI who are carefully assessed to be at low bleeding risk and heightened ischemic risk, and have tolerated antiplatelet therapy without a major bleeding during 1 year of DAPT.

Clinical Outcomes After Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation at One Month Among Troponin-Negative Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subanalysis of the Recre8 Trial

Clinical Outcomes After Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation at One Month Among Troponin-Negative Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subanalysis of the Recre8 Trial

Impact of dual antiplatelet non-adherence after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with or without history of myocardial infarction

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf PARIS (patterns of non-adherence to antiplatelet regimen in stented patients) INTRODUCTION In patients with myocardial infarction (MI) predisposition to atherothrombosis may persist for years, and prolonged DAPT could be beneficial in these high-risk group. Similarly, premature dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation seems to increase the risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). If DAPT non-adherence could have an enhanced impact on prognosis in patients with prior MI is still an uncharted territory. METHODS in this prospective, observational, multicentre registry we enrolled all patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation in 15 clinical sites in USA and Europe and discharged with DAPT. Prespecified categories for DAPT cessation included physician recommended discontinuation, brief interruption (for surgery), or disruption (non-compliance or because of bleeding). Using Cox models with time-varying covariates, we examined the effect of DAPT cessation on major adverse cardiac events (MACE, primary endpoint, composite of cardiac death, definite or probable stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization), its single components, and if patients with prior MI had different rate of DAPT cessation or MACE. RESULTS patients with prior MI (n = 1214; 24.2%) presented more often with cardiovascular risk factors compared to patients without prior MI (n = 3804, 75.8%). Interruption rate was similar among the two groups. Patients with prior MI had lower rate of any DAPT discontinuation and disruption compared to patients without prior MI. This notwithstanding, patients with prior MI had increased 2-year rates of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.20 - 1.67) and its single components (with the exception of definite or probable stent thrombosis), irrespective of DAPT non-adherence (p interaction= 0.983). CONCLUSION in this real world cohort of patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation, patients with prior MI, despite lower rate of DAPT non-adherence, had worse prognosis than patients without prior MI. New antithrombotic strategies are needed to improve the bleeding/ischemic trade-off in patients with prior MI and their outcome after PCI.

Prolonged antithrombotic therapy in patients after acute coronary syndrome: A critical appraisal of current European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

The increased risk of non-cardiovascular death in patients receiving clopidogrel or prasugrel in comparison with the placebo group in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) trial in contrast to the decreased risk of cardiovascular death and all-cause death seen in patients treated with low-dose ticagrelor in the EU label population of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial, resulted in inclusion in the 2020 ESC NSTE-ACS guidelines the recommendation for use of clopidogrel or prasugrel only if the patient is not eligible for treatment with ticagrelor. The prevalence of the primary outcome composed of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction was lower in the low-dose rivaroxaban and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) group than in the ASA-alone group in the COMPASS trial. Moreover, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates were lower in the rivaroxaban-plus-ASA group. Comparison of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 and COMPASS trial patient characteristics clearly shows that each of these treatment strategies should be addressed at different groups of patients. A greater benefit in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with a high risk of ischemic events and without high bleeding risk may be expected with ASA and ticagrelor 60 mg b.i.d. when the therapy is continued without interruption or with short interruption only after ACS. On the other hand, ASA and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. seems to be a better option when indications for dual antithrombotic therapy (DATT) appear after a longer time from ACS (more than 2 years) and/or from cessation of DAPT (more than 1 year) and in patients with multiple vascular bed atherosclerosis. Thus, both options of DATTs complement each other rather than compete, as can be presumed from the recommendations. However, a direct comparison between these strategies should be tested in future clinical trials.

Recovery of platelet reactivity following cessation of either aspirin or ticagrelor in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a GLOBAL LEADERS substudy

Cessation of one component of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with increased risk of ischemic events but it is uncertain whether discontinuation of aspirin is preferable to discontinuation of the oral P2Y12 inhibitor. The GLOBAL LEADERS study compared two antiplatelet strategies following PCI, cessation of aspirin at 1 month with continued ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months versus standard DAPT for 12 months followed by aspirin monotherapy for a further 12 months. We assessed recovery of platelet reactivity after withdrawal of either aspirin or ticagrelor at 1 month and 12 months, respectively, in this study. Platelet aggregation (PA) was assessed before cessation of DAPT (‘baseline’) and after 2, 7, and 14 days post-cessation using Multiplate whole-blood aggregometry with collagen, thrombin-receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA) as agonists. Following cessation of aspirin at 1 month, there was marked recovery of PA induced by AA (baseline [mean ± SD]: 11.1 ± 7.4 U vs. 14 days: 64.9 ± 19.6 U, p < .0001) and collagen (37.4 ± 22.9 U vs. 79.8 ± 13.8 U, p < .0001), whereas PA induced by ADP (18.6 ± 6.6 vs. 69.1 ± 20.5, p < .0001) and collagen (34.4 ± 18.7 U vs. 43.0 ± 21.0, p = .0018) recovered following cessation of ticagrelor at 12 months. There were no significant changes in TRAP-induced PA in either group. In conclusion, cessation of either component of DAPT leads to substantial increase in platelet reactivity with differential effects on different pathways of platelet activation when aspirin or the P2Y12 inhibitor is stopped. Further work is required to determine which patients receive net benefit from long-term continuation of DAPT.

Prolonged antithrombotic therapy in patients after acute coronary syndrome: A critical appraisal of current European Society of Cardiology guidelines

The increased risk of non-cardiovascular death in patients receiving clopidogrel or prasugrel in comparison with the placebo group in the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial in contrast to the decreased risk of cardiovascular death and all-cause death seen in patients treated with low-dose ticagrelor in the EU label population of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial, resulted in inclusion in the 2020 ESC NSTE-ACS guidelines the recommendation for use of clopidogrel or prasugrel only if the patient is not eligible for treatment with ticagrelor. The prevalence of the primary outcome composed of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction was lower in the low-dose rivaroxaban and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) group than in the ASA-alone group in the COMPASS trial. Moreover, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates were lower in the rivaroxaban-plus-ASA group. Comparison of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 and COMPASS trial patient characteristics clearly shows that each of these treatment strategies should be addressed at different groups of patients. A greater benefit in postacute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with a high risk of ischemic events and without high bleeding risk may be expected with ASA and ticagrelor 60 mg b.i.d. when the therapy is continued without interruption or with short interruption only after ACS. On the other hand, ASA and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. seems to be a better option when indications for dual antithrombotic treatment (DATT) appear after a longer time from ACS (more than two years) and/or from cessation of DAPT (more than one year) and in patients with multiple vascular bed atherosclerosis. Thus, both options of DATTs complement each other rather than compete, as can be presumed from the recommendations. However, a direct comparison between these strategies should be tested in future clinical trials.

1-Year COMBO stent outcomes stratified by the PARIS bleeding prediction score: From the MASCOT registry.

BackgroundThe COMBO stent is a biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with endothelial progenitor cell capture technology for faster endothelialization.ObjectiveWe analyzed COMBO stent outcomes in relation to bleeding risk using the PARIS bleeding score.MethodsMASCOT was an international registry of all-comers undergoing attempted COMBO stent implantation. We stratified patients as low bleeding-risk (LBR) for PARIS score ≤ 3 and intermediate-to-high (IHBR) for score > 3 based on baseline age, body mass index, anemia, current smoking, chronic kidney disease and need for triple therapy. Primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) not clearly attributed to a non-target vessel or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Bleeding was adjudicated using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation was independently adjudicated.ResultsThe study included 56% (n = 1270) LBR and 44% (n = 1009) IHBR patients. Incidence of 1-year TLF was higher in IHBR patients (4.1% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.047) driven by cardiac death (1.7% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.029) with similar rates of MI (1.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.17), TLR (1.5% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.89) and definite/ probable stent thrombosis (1.2% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.16). Incidence of 1-year major BARC 3 or 5 bleeding was significantly higher in IHBR patients (2.3% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.0094), as was the incidence of DAPT cessation (29.3% vs. 22.8%, p < 0.01), driven by physician-guided discontinuation.ConclusionsPatients with intermediate-to-high PARIS bleeding risk in the MASCOT registry experienced greater incidence of 1-year TLF, major bleeding and DAPT cessation than LBR patients, without significant differences in stent thrombosis.

Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management.

Perioperative cardiovascular complications are important causes of morbidity and mortality associated with non-cardiac surgery, particularly in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although preoperative cardiac risk assessment can facilitate the identification of vulnerable patients and implementation of adequate preventive measures, excessive evaluation might lead to undue resource utilization and surgical delay. Owing to conflicting data, there remains some uncertainty regarding the most beneficial perioperative strategy for patients with CAD. Antithrombotic agents are the cornerstone of secondary prevention of ischaemic events but substantially increase the risk of bleeding. Given that 5-25% of patients undergoing coronary stent implantation require non-cardiac surgery within 2 years, surgery is the most common reason for premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy, which necessitates concomitant evaluation of the individual thrombotic and bleeding risks related to both clinical and procedural factors, poses a recurring dilemma in clinical practice. Current guidelines do not provide detailed recommendations on this topic, and the optimal approach in these patients is yet to be determined. This Review summarizes the current data guiding preoperative risk stratification as well as periprocedural management of patients with CAD undergoing non-cardiac surgery, including those treated with stents.

Point-of-Care Platelet Function Monitoring: Implications for Patients With Platelet Inhibitors in Cardiac Surgery

Although most physicians are comfortable managing the limited anticoagulant effect of aspirin, the recent administration of potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains a dilemma. Guidelines recommend discontinuation of potent P2Y12 inhibitors 5- to- 7 days before surgery to reduce the risk of postoperative hemorrhage. Such a strategy might not be feasible before urgent surgery, due to ongoing myocardial ischemia or in patients at high risk for thromboembolic events. Recently, different point-of-care devices to assess functional platelet quality have become available for clinical use. The aim of this narrative review was to evaluate the implications and potential benefits of platelet function monitoring in guiding perioperative management and therapeutic options in patients treated with antiplatelets, including aspirin or P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, undergoing cardiac surgery. No objective superiority of one point-of-care device over another was found in a large meta-analysis. Their accuracy and reliability are generally limited in the perioperative period. In particular, preoperative platelet function testing has been used to assess platelet contribution to bleeding after cardiac surgery. However, predictive values for postoperative hemorrhage and transfusion requirements are low, and there is a significant variability between and within these tests. Further, platelet function monitoring has been used to optimize the preoperative waiting period after cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy before urgent cardiac surgery. Furthermore, studies assessing their value in therapeutic decisions in bleeding patients after cardiac surgery are scarce. A general and liberal use of perioperative platelet function testing is not yet recommended.

Comparison of One-Year Outcomes in Patients >75 Versus ≤75 Years With Coronary Artery Disease Treated With COMBO Stents (From The MASCOT Registry)

Older patients who undergo coronary interventions are at greater risk of ischemic events and less likely to tolerate prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) due to bleeding risk. The COMBO biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent promotes rapid endothelialization through endothelial progenitor cell capture technology which may be advantageous in elderly patients. We compared 1-year clinical outcomes and DAPT cessation events in patients >75 versus ≤75 years from the MASCOT registry. MASCOT was a prospective, multicenter cohort study of all-comers undergoing attempted COMBO stenting. The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF), composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) not clearly attributed to a nontarget vessel or clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Bleeding was adjudicated using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Adjusted outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression methods. The study included 18% (n = 479) patients >75 years and 72% (n = 2,135) patients ≤75 years. One-year TLF occurred in 4.6% patients >75 years versus 3.1% patients ≤75years of age, p = 0.10; adj hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence intervals 0.77 to 2.38, p = 0.29. There were no significant differences in cardiac death (1.7% vs 1.3%, p = 0.55), MI (2.1% vs 1.2%, p = 0.14), target lesion revascularization (1.7% vs 1.4%, p = 0.60) and definite stent thrombosis (0.8% vs 0.4%, p = 0.19). Major Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3,5 bleeding (3.1% vs 1.5%, p = 0.01) and DAPT cessation rates (32.4% vs 23.0%, p <0.001) were significantly higher in elderly patients. In conclusion, elderly patients >75 years treated with COMBO stents had similar TLF but significantly greater incidence of bleeding than younger patients and DAPT cessation in one-third of patients over 1 year.

Drug-coated Balloons or Drug-eluting Stents - Determining an Optimum Strategy for Patients with High Bleeding Risk.

he management of patients who require percutaneous coronary intervention and are at high risk of bleeding continues to be challenging; balancing thrombotic risk versus bleeding risk to determine the safest duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). With recent efforts to determine the safety of 1 month of DAPT after implantation of a drug-eluting stent, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have also been explored, as both have been shown superior to bare-metal stents, which have historically been used for patients with high bleeding risk. We sought to review the literature surrounding the safety profile and bleeding events with both DCBs and drug-eluting stents, and conclude that while both offer safety of cessation of DAPT after 1 month, DCBs offer lower major adverse cardiovascular events.

Massive, Spontaneous Ruptured Renal Subcapsular Haematoma Following Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: Thrombolytic therapy remains widely used in majority of developing countries, where delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a challenge. Unfortunately, complications following such therapy remains prominent, predominantly bleeding-related problems. We present a rare case of massive renal subcapsular haemorrhage and hematoma following thrombolytic therapy. Case Report: A 61-year old gentleman presented following an episode of chest pain due to acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Due to potential delays in obtaining PCI, the patient was counselled for thrombolysis using streptokinase which he had consented to. Unfortunately, within 36 hours of admission, he developed abdominal pain, haematuria, hypotension and altered mental status, associated with acute drops in haemoglobin levels. Following initial resuscitation efforts, a Computed Tomography scan of the abdomen was performed revealing a massive renal subcapsular hematoma, likely secondary to previous thrombolysis. Discussion: Renal subcapsular hematoma can either be spontaneous or iatrogenic, the latter often due to coexisting renal-based neoplasm or vasculitidies. Iatrogenic causes include trauma, following renal biopsies or anticoagulation therapy amongst a few others. Iatrogenic renal subcapsular haemorrhage and hematoma formation are rare following thrombolysis. Our literature search revealed only one other similar case, although this was following administration of recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in a case of acute ischaemic cerebrovascular accident. Conclusion: This case highlights the complexity in management, following the findings in terms of need for cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy and timing for PCI and stent selection.

Incidence of Adverse Events at 3 Months Versus at 12 Months After Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation in Patients Treated With Thin Stents With Unprotected Left Main or Coronary Bifurcations

Incidence and predictors of adverse events after dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation in patients treated with thin stents (<100 microns) in unprotected left main (ULM) or coronary bifurcation remain undefined. All consecutive patients presenting with a critical lesion of an ULM or involving a main coronary bifurcation who were treated with very thin strut stents were included. MACE (a composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction [MI], target lesion revascularization [TLR], and stent thrombosis [ST]) was the primary endpoint, whereas target vessel revascularization (TVR) was the secondary endpoint, with particular attention to type and occurrence of ST and occurrence of ST, CV death, and MI during DAPT or after DAPT discontinuation. All analyses were performed according to length of DAPT dividing the patients in 3 groups: Short DAPT (3-months), intermediate DAPT (3 to 12 months), and long DAPT (12-months). A total of 117 patients were discharged with an indication for DAPT ≤3 months (median 1: 1 to 2.5), 200 for DAPT between 3 and 12 months (median 8: 7 to 10), and 1,958 with 12 months DAPT. After 12.8 months (8 to 20), MACE was significantly higher in the 3-month group compared with 3 to 12 and 12-month groups (9.4% vs 4.0% vs 7.2%, p ≤0.001), mainly driven by MI (4.4% vs 1.5% vs 3%, p ≤0.001) and overall ST (4.3% vs 1.5% vs 1.8%, p ≤0.001). Independent predictors of MACE were low GFR and a 2 stent strategy. Independent predictors of ST were DAPT duration <3 months and the use of a 2-stent strategy. In conclusion, even stents with very thin strut when implanted in real-life ULM or coronary bifurcation patients discharged with short DAPT have a relevant risk of ST, which remains high although not significant after DAPT cessation.