Osteoporosis Drug Research Articles

Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation for a randomised controlled trial to improve shared decision-making about, and uptake of, osteoporosis medicines: the iFraP study

Background High quality shared decision-making (SDM) conversations involve people with or at risk of osteoporosis and clinicians working together to decide, where appropriate, which evidence-based medicines best fit the person’s life, beliefs, and values. The improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug treatments (iFraP) intervention comprises a computerised Decision Support Tool (DST), clinician training package and information resources, designed for use in UK Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) consultations. The iFraP intervention will be tested in a pragmatic, parallel-group, individual randomised controlled trial in patients referred to four FLSs in England. This mixed methods process evaluation aims to assess which components of iFraP were delivered and how (fidelity), whether iFraP results in a change in osteoporosis drug treatment initiation rates and how, and how context affects implementation of iFraP and outcomes. Methods We will collect quantitative data using (1) Case Report Forms completed by FLS clinicians; (2) self-reported questionnaires completed by patient participants; and (3) DST analytic data. We will collect qualitative data using (1) semi-structured interviews with patients who receive the iFraP intervention in their FLS appointment, FLS clinicians delivering iFraP appointments, and primary care clinicians that have consulted with a patient following their iFraP FLS appointment; and (2) FLS consultation recordings. A triangulation protocol will be used to integrate the quantitative and qualitative findings to generate novel insights about the intervention under evaluation. Discussion The process evaluation, alongside the trial, will help to understand what elements of the iFraP intervention were delivered and how, the mechanisms of impact and how context affected implementation and outcomes, and intervention acceptability. Mixed methods interpretation will lead to further insights about the implementation of SDM and DSTs in-practice. Trial registration ISRCTN: 10606407, 21/11/2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10606407

Multi-omics Data Integration Analysis Identified Therapeutic Targets and Potential Reuse Drugs for Osteoporosis.

To facilitate drug discovery and development for the treatment of osteoporosis. With global aging, osteoporosis has become a common problem threatening the health of the elderly. It is of important clinical value to explore new targets for drug intervention and develop promising drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis. To understand the major molecules that mediate the communication between the cell populations of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis patients and identify potential reusable drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data of BM-MSCs in GSE147287 dataset were classified using the Seurat package. CellChat was devoted to analyzing the ligand-receptor pairs (LR pairs) contributing to the communication between BM-MSCs subsets. The LR pairs that were differentially expressed between osteoporosis samples and control samples and significantly correlated with immune score were screened in the GSE35959 dataset, and the differentially expressed gene in both GSE35959 and GSE13850 data sets were identified as targets from a single ligand or receptor. The therapeutic drugs for osteoporosis were screened by network proximity method, and the top-ranked drugs were selected for molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation with the target targets. Twelve subsets of BM-MSCs were identified, of which CD45-BM-MSCS_4, CD45-BM- MSCS_5, and CD45+ BM-MSCs_5 subsets showed significantly different distributions between osteoporosis samples and osteoarthritis samples. Six LR pairs were identified in the bidirectional communication between these three BM-MSCs subsets and other BM-MSCs subsets. Among them, MIF-CD74 and ITGB2-ICAM2 were significantly correlated with the immune score. CD74 was identified as the target, and a total of 48 drugs targeting CD47 protein were identified. Among them, DB01940 had the lowest free energy binding score with CD74 protein and the binding state was very stable. This study provided a new network-based framework for drug reuse and identified initial insights into therapeutic agents targeting CD74 in osteoporosis, which may be meaningful for promoting the development of osteoporosis treatment.

Geriatric traumatological management of osteoporosis : "Let the first fracture be the last"

In Germany more than 800,000 osteoporotic fractures occur every year, with severe medical, social and health economic consequences. Nevertheless, as in many other countries there is alarge gap in care. Fractures frequently occur in older geriatric patients, who are increasingly being (or should be) treated in geriatric trauma centers. This multidisciplinary approach offers the opportunity not only to restore the patient's mobility and independence but also to set the course for preventing further fractures. Diagnosing osteoporosis and initiating treatment early after afracture is particularly important as there is an imminently high risk of further fractures in the months and years following afracture. This review article describes apragmatic, guideline-based approach to osteoporosis management for geriatric trauma patients. It discusses fracture risk assessment, current treatment thresholds and treatment strategies as well as the individual osteoporosis drugs, the indications and contraindications. This review aims to show that the treatment of osteoporosis within the framework of ageriatric traumatology team is feasible in the majority of cases. It is suggested that atreatment decision can be systematically made based on afew questions or aflow chart.

7740 Adult-Onset Hypophosphatasia Presenting As Low Alkaline Phosphatase Level Following Denosumab Use For Osteoporosis

Abstract Disclosure: J. Ocampo Mascaro: None. P. Wax: None. M. Al Mukaddam: Grant Recipient; Self; Ipsen, Incyte Research Funding. Background: Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a genetic disease characterized by low activity of the tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase. It has a broad range of clinical phenotypes, with adults usually presenting with an incidental low alkaline phosphatase (ALP) finding. Differentiating this from other causes of low ALP is challenging, especially when treating osteoporosis, as antiresorptive therapy such as denosumab and bisphosphonates may cause low ALP and carry the potential of increasing risk of atypical femoral fractures in patients with undiagnosed HPP. Clinical Case: A 64-year-old woman with history of nephrolithiasis, hypercalciuria, and osteoporosis (screening DXA lowest T-score -3.3 in femoral neck (FN)) but no prior fractures or dental issues was seen in clinic. Initial bloodwork showed normal range calcium, 25-OH vitamin D, and intact PTH. Pre-treatment ALP was 42 IU/L (N 39-117). Work up for secondary causes of osteoporosis was negative. Three yearly doses of IV zoledronic acid resulted in +4.2% BMD increase in lumbar spine (LS) but no changes in FN. She had no side effects but was found to have a decrease in ALP to 33 IU/L. This normalized back to 42 IU/L during a three-year drug holiday. Follow up DXA noted significant decline in BMD, hence denosumab was initiated. ALP decreased back to the 30-35 IU/L range. Fasting Vitamin B6 level (off B6 supplements for 1 week) was 23.4 ng/ml (N 2.1-21). Urine phosphoethanolamine was mildly elevated at 5 mmol/mol creatinine (N ≤4). Genetic testing evidenced a pathogenic ALPL variant (Exon 6, c.575T>C (p.Met192Thr), heterozygous) compatible with HPP. She had tolerated three doses of denosumab by then with BMD improvement of 5.0% in LS but no changes in FN and no atypical femoral fracture. Denosumab was stopped. Abaloparatide was started for osteoporosis with close monitoring for worsening hypercalciuria. Conclusion: This case demonstrates that adult HPP patients may present with subtle findings and lower range of normal ALP and may tolerate short courses of antiresorptive agents. There is a need for better screening and diagnostic criteria for adult HPP patients whose ALP levels may not be initially low before initiating antiresorptive drugs for osteoporosis. The risk of adverse effects from therapy will likely vary significantly based on the clinical severity/presentation of HPP as some adults with lower ALP ranges might be more susceptible to developing atypical femur fractures (1). Balancing atypical femur fracture risk with the benefits of antiresorptive treatment in decreasing risk of osteoporotic fractures highlights the need for better risk stratification to prevent undertreatment of osteoporosis. Reference: 1. Warren AM, Ebeling PR, Grill V, Seeman E, Sztal-Mazer S. Bilateral atypical femoral fractures during denosumab therapy in a patient with adult-onset hypophosphatasia. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2021 Sep 1;2021:21-0096. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Influence of Osteoporosis on the Course of Apical Periodontitis.

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by disruption of the bone microarchitecture. It is observed in both sexes, but to a greater extent in women. It affects the whole body, including the jaws. The main indicator of the presence of osteoporosis accepted by the World Health Organization is bone mineral density. The aim of this article is to find data on the influence of osteoporosis on apical periodontitis, to investigate how the intake of osteoporosis drugs affects apical periodontitis, and to establish various data that may be of benefit to the dental practitioner when treating patients with osteoporosis and apical periodontitis. Open-access publications are included. The presence of osteoporosis is important to the dentist. Apical periodontitis in these patients has a faster progression. They are characterized by inflammation and destruction of the tissues located around the tooth root. Osteoporosis has a destructive effect on bone tissue through different mechanisms: nuclear factor-κβ ligand and NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β cascade. It is also associated with low estrogen levels. Various medications such as corticosteroids, bisphosphonates (alendronate, zoledronate (Zoledronic acid), calcitonin, raloxifene, and strontium used to treat osteoporosis can affect the course of apical periodontitis. When treating patients with periapical lesions, the dentist must take a proper medical history and general medical history. In cases of osteoporosis or taking bisphosphonates and other medications, consideration should be given to whether consultation with a specialist is necessary, what treatment approach would be most appropriate, and what the prognosis will be. Chronic diseases affect both the general state of the body and dental health. It has been found that in patients with osteoporosis, inflammation of the apical periodontium develops with faster bone resorption. Before starting dental treatment, it is important to specify the etiology of osteoporosis, the bone density of each patient, as well as the medications they are taking.

Physician-dentist dual referral model concept for coordinated bone anabolic therapy

BackgroundBone anabolic drugs used for the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis have the potential to enhance alveolar bone regeneration to improve implant success. There are no US Food and Drug Administration–approved drugs indicated to improve oral bone density around teeth or implants. MethodsThe authors summarized expert opinions on a novel coordinated treatment approach leveraging the effects of systemic bone anabolic drugs to enhance dental implant therapy in patients with osteoporosis and a dual referral model for physicians and dentists to address the clinical needs of patients with osteoporosis from a comprehensive perspective of oral-systemic health. Interviews of key opinion leaders were conducted with a bone health specialist group consisting of specialists in orthopedic surgery, internal medicine, geriatrics, endocrinology, and clinical densitometry and a surgical dental specialist group consisting of periodontists and oral surgeons. ResultsOverall, both groups shared positive feedback on the idea of strategically timing administration of anabolic osteoporosis drugs with dental treatment. Both groups expressed interest in the dual referral model. ConclusionsThe feedback of key opinion leaders supported the coordinated bone anabolic therapy concept and identified a need for improved interdisciplinary collaboration, education, and communication to realize the synergies of physician-dentist clinical cooperation. Practical ImplicationsStrategic timing of osteoporosis therapy could improve skeletal bone health and reduce fracture risk while offering adjunctive dental benefits.

Identification of novel RANKL inhibitors through in silico analysis

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) is considered the principal regulator of osteoclast differentiation. Therefore, strategies interfering with the RANKL-RANK signaling pathway may effectively inhibit osteoclast differentiation and mitigate bone resorption. Consequently, RANKL has become a promising target for new drug design strategies. Despite extensive research on specific drugs and antibodies, only a few have shown efficacy in treating osteoporosis. To address this challenge, we aimed to explore new approaches for designing drugs for osteoporosis. In this study, a 3D quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) pharmacophore model was built for RANKL with reference to known inhibitor IC50 values. The optimal pharmacophore model was then employed as a 3D query to screen databases for novel lead compounds. The obtained compounds were subjected to ADMET and TOPKAT analyses to predict drug pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Molecular docking and de novo evolution approaches were applied to verify the docking binding affinities of the compounds. Five candidate compounds were subjected to further in vitro analyses to assess their anti-osteoporotic effects, among which compound 4 demonstrated significant inhibitory activity, achieving an inhibitory rate of 92.6 % on osteoclastogenesis at a concentration of 10 μM. Subsequent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to assess the stability and behavior of compound 4 and its evolved variant, ZINC00059014397_Evo, within the RANKL binding site revealed that the variant is a potential therapeutic agent for targeting osteoclasts. This study offers valuable insights for developing next generation RANKL inhibitors for osteoporosis treatments.

Potential drug targets for osteoporosis identified: A Mendelian randomization study

BackgroundOsteoporosis is a prevalent global health condition, primarily affecting the aging population, and several therapies for osteoporosis have been widely used. However, available drugs for osteoporosis are far from satisfactory because they cannot alleviate disease progression. This study aimed to explore potential drug targets for osteoporosis through Mendelian randomization analysis. MethodsUsing cis-expression quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTL) data of druggable genes and two genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets related to osteoporosis (UK Biobank and FinnGen cohorts), we employed mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to identify the druggable genes with causal relationships with osteoporosis. Subsequently, a series of follow-up analyses were conducted, such as colocalization analysis, cell-type specificity analysis, and correlation analysis with risk factors. The association between potential drug targets and osteoporosis was validated by qRT-PCR. ResultsSix druggable genes with causal relationships with osteoporosis were identified and successfully replicated, including ACPP, DNASE1L3, IL32, PPOX, ST6GAL1, and TGM3. Cell-type specificity analysis revealed that PPOX and ST6GAL1 were expressed in all cell types in the bone samples, while IL32, ACPP, DNASE1L3, and TGM3 were expressed in specific cell types. The GWAS data showed there were seven risk factors for osteoporosis, including vitamin D deficiency, COPD, physical activity, BMI, MMP-9, ALP and PTH. Furthermore, ACPP was associated with vitamin D deficiency and COPD; DNASE1L3 was linked to physical activity; IL32 correlated with BMI and MMP-9; and ST6GAL1 was related to ALP, physical activity, and MMP-9. Among these risk factors, only MMP-9 had a high genetic correlation with osteoporosis. The results of qRT-PCR demonstrated that IL32 was upregulated while ST6GAL1 was downregulated in peripheral blood of osteoporosis patients. ConclusionOur findings suggested that those six druggable genes offer potential drug targets for osteoporosis and require further clinical investigation, especially IL32 and ST6GAL1.

Drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Comparison table: Some drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Comparison table: Some drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Role of ubiquitination in the occurrence and development of osteoporosis (Review).

The ubiquitin (Ub)‑proteasome system (UPS) plays a pivotal role in maintaining protein homeostasis and function to modulate various cellular processes including skeletal cell differentiation and bone homeostasis. The Ub ligase E3 promotes the transfer of Ub to the target protein, especially transcription factors, to regulate the proliferation, differentiation and survival of bone cells, as well as bone formation. In turn, the deubiquitinating enzyme removes Ub from modified substrate proteins to orchestrate bone remodeling. As a result of abnormal regulation of ubiquitination, bone cell differentiation exhibits disorder and then bone homeostasis is affected, consequently leading to osteoporosis. The present review discussed the role and mechanism of UPS in bone remodeling. However, the specific mechanism of UPS in the process of bone remodeling is still not fully understood and further research is required. The study of the mechanism of action of UPS can provide new ideas and methods for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In addition, the most commonly used osteoporosis drugs that target ubiquitination processes in the clinic are discussed in the current review.

The Current Status of Sequential Therapy with Commonly Used Anti-Osteoporosis Drugs

As the trend of population aging intensifies, the incidence of osteoporosis is rising correspondingly. Osteoporotic fractures are one of the primary causes of disability and death in elderly patients, placing a great burden on both families and society in terms of medical care resources. The monotherapy of osteoporosis drugs has certain limitations and sequential drug treatment should be considered under the following circumstances: (i) when bone resorption inhibitors fail to work, have been used for too long, or cause adverse reactions; (ii) when the recommended treatment course of bone formation promoters (such as parathyroid hormone analogues) has ended but the patient's fracture risk remains high and requires continued treatment; (iii) when short-acting drugs such as teriparatide or denosumab need to maintain treatment effects after discontinuation. The sequential therapy of osteoporosis drugs can be categorized according to the mechanism of action into the following schemes: (i) bone formation promoters followed by bone resorption inhibitors; (ii) bone resorption inhibitors followed by bone formation promoters; (iii) different types of bone resorption inhibitors used sequentially; (iv) other sequential drug treatments. Osteoporosis is a progressive disease, and the ageing of the human population cannot be reversed. Therefore, single-drug treatment is unlikely to achieve the goal of long-term disease prevention and control, making the exploration of long-term treatment plans for existing drugs a key aspect of osteoporosis drug treatment.

Is denosumab an efficient and safe drug for osteoporosis in dialysis patients? Considerations and state of the art about its use in this setting.

In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), renal osteodystrophy may be associated with a progressive bone mass loss that increases fracture risk. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting osteoclast activity, is an antiresorptive medication used for the treatment osteoporosis. Its efficacy and safety were initially established in the FREEDOM study, showing a significant reduction in incident fractures in osteoporotic women treated with denosumab. Subsequent post hoc analyses showed its efficacy in patients stratified by kidney function, but these analyses did not include patients with advanced stages of CKD. The capability of denosumab in improving bone mineral density in uremic patients was evaluated in 12 studies including 461 dialysis patients with low bone mineral density. The improvement of bone mineral density was the final end point in these studies assessed during a follow-up of 6-60months. Nine of these studies did not have hyperparathyroidism among criteria for patient inclusion and their participants may have low-turnover bone disease. Despite current recommendations, no patients underwent bone biopsy before denosumab therapy. Overall, findings in these studies suggest that denosumab is a viable option for promoting bone mass recovery in patients with advanced stages of CKD having either high or low serum levels of PTH. However, the increase of bone mineral density was lower in patients with low serum markers of bone turnover at baseline. These studies also highlighted the need for calcium and vitamin D supplementation to prevent hypocalcemia that remains a serious concern. Denosumab emerges as a potentially safe and effective option for enhancing bone health in CKD patients.

Pharmacist-initiated interventions to test quantitative bone mineral density and prescribe osteoporosis medications to prevent steroid-induced osteoporosis.

Fragility fractures associated with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) can markedly impair quality of life. However, only 20% of patients are treated in compliance with the relevant management guidelines, and bone mineral density analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is only rarely performed. We report the intervention methods suggested by pharmacists and describe their efficacy. Patients who visited the outpatient clinic of the General Medicine Department of Ogaki Municipal Hospital and received steroids were enrolled. The rates of DXA implementation and compliance with GIO pharmacotherapy guidelines before and after pharmacist to physician-suggested interventions were compared. Guideline compliance was defined as prescription of osteoporosis drugs to patients with a score of ≥3. Administered prophylaxes and bone mineral density were subsequently assessed. The before and after intervention DXA rates were 1% (1/100 patients) and 96.0% (96/100 patients; P<0.01), respectively. Overall, 96.9% (93/96) of the patients met the GIO criteria for pharmacotherapy initiation (score ≥3), and the guideline compliance rates before and after the intervention were 39.8% (37/93) and 93.5% (87/93; P<0.01), respectively. Of the 56 patients who did not receive prophylaxis, 52 were recommended treatment, yielding an acceptance rate of 82.7% (43/52). Among the 37 patients receiving prophylaxis, 20 (54.1%) had a DXA-related young adult mean of ≤70%, of whom 11 (55.0%) agreed to drug therapy. The acceptance rate of pharmacotherapy recommendations for patients not receiving prophylaxis was higher than that for those receiving prophylaxis (P=0.03). Pharmacist-initiated interventions for GIO facilitates the administration of appropriate pharmacotherapy.

Alendronate carbon dots targeting bone immune microenvironment for the treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are some of the most widely used drugs in osteoporosis (OP) treatment, but they can cause severe side effects such as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), causing great pain in patients. It is necessary to develop a novel drug for treating OP with fewer side effects. In this study, novel carbon dots, ALEN-CDs, derived from polyethylene glycol (PEG) and alendronate (ALEN) are developed. ALEN-CDs have good biocompatibility, photoluminescence (PL) properties, and bone-targeting ability. They can inhibit the differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts, play an immunoregulatory role by inhibiting macrophage polarization to the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, and promote polarization to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. It is worth noting that compared with ALEN, high-dose applications of ALEN-CDs do not lead to BRONJ, which may be related to the regulatory effect on M2 macrophage polarization. Moreover, in vivo studies show that ALEN-CDs significantly reduce bone loss and improve OP in ovariectomized mice (OVX). And a proteomic analysis suggestes that ALEN-CDs regulate the bone immune microenvironment by affecting mitochondrial metabolism, especially oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). In conclusion, ALEN-CDs could directly inhibit osteoclast differentiation and regulate the bone immune microenvironment and may be a promising drug for OP treatment.

Pre-treatment bone mineral density and the benefit of pharmacologic treatment on fracture risk and BMD change: analysis from the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project.

Some osteoporosis drug trials have suggested that treatment is more effective in those with low BMD measured by DXA. This study used data from a large set of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of treatments differs according to baseline BMD. We used individual patient data from 25 RCTs (103 086 subjects) of osteoporosis medications collected as part of the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project. Participants were stratified into FN BMD T-score subgroups (≤-2.5, > -2.5). We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate treatment effect for clinical fracture outcomes and logistic regression for the radiographic vertebral fracture outcome. We also performed analyses based on BMD quintiles. Overall, 42% had a FN BMD T-score ≤ -2.5. Treatment with anti-osteoporosis drugs led to significant reductions in fractures in both T-score ≤ -2.5 and > -2.5 subgroups. Compared to those with FN BMD T-score > -2.5, the risk reduction for each fracture outcome was greater in those with T-score ≤ -2.5, but only the all-fracture outcome reached statistical significance (interaction P = .001). Results were similar when limited to bisphosphonate trials. In the quintile analysis, there was significant anti-fracture efficacy across all quintiles for vertebral fractures and with greater effects on fracture risk reduction for non-vertebral, all, and all clinical fractures in the lower BMD quintiles (all interaction P ≤ .03). In summary, anti-osteoporotic medications reduced the risk of fractures regardless of baseline BMD. Significant fracture risk reduction with treatment for 4 of the 5 fracture endpoints was seen in participants with T-scores above -2.5, though effects tended to be larger and more significant in those with baseline T-scores <-2.5.

Osteoporosis treatments for intervertebral disc degeneration and back pain: a perspective.

Low back pain derived from intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a debilitating spinal condition that, despite its prevalence, does not have any intermediary guidelines for pharmacological treatment between palliative care and invasive surgery. The development of treatments for the IVD is complicated by the variety of resident cell types needed to maintain the regionally distinct structural properties of the IVD that permit the safe, complex motions of the spine. Osteoporosis of the spine increases the risk of vertebral bone fracture that can increase the incidence of back pain. Fortunately, there are a variety of pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis that target osteoblasts, osteoclasts and/or osteocytes to build bone and prevent vertebral fracture. Of particular note, clinical and preclinical studies suggest that commonly prescribed osteoporosis drugs like bisphosphonates, intermittent parathyroid hormone, anti-sclerostin antibody, selective estrogen receptor modulators and anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand inhibitor denosumab may also relieve back pain. Here, we cite clinical and preclinical studies and include unpublished data to support the argument that a subset of these therapeutics for osteoporosis may alleviate low back pain by also targeting the IVD.

Deprescribing bisphosphonates in the osteoporosis treatment in older people

The term deprescribing (de-prescribe) means the abolition of appointments. In the modern researches, deprescribing is presented as a planned and controlled process of dose reduction or drug cessation, which can potentially harm the patient and/or does not benefit the patient. The target population for deprescribing is the older people, as old age and limited life expectancy are themselves reasons to try to reduce and optimize the drug load. Frailty syndrome or dementia, decreased kidney function and comorbidity are expected to coexist with polypragmasy and inconsistent appointments of different specialists. In foreign and domestic scientific studies there are manuals and recommendations on deprescribing of various groups of drugs for the elderly and seniors: proton pump inhibitors, sugary drugs, psychotropic drugs and others. However, with regard to osteoporosis drug therapy, the concept of deprescribing is debated rather sparingly, despite the possible serious side effects of osteoporosis treatment in the older age group.The review presents data from small clinical studies and systematic reviews describing deprescribing antiosteoporotic drugs from the bisphosphonate group, the reasons for their withdrawal and its consequences for the elderly and seniors with osteoporosis, as well as the analysis of tools for optimizing pharmacotherapy in elderly and seniors with respect to deprescribing of bisphosphonates.

On-time denosumab dosing recovered rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet remains suboptimal.

Timely administration of denosumab every 6mo is critical in osteoporosis treatment to avoid multiple vertebral fracture risk upon denosumab discontinuation or delay. This study aimed to estimate the immediate and prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the timing of denosumab doses. We identified older adults (≥66yr) residing in the community who were due to receive denosumab between January 2016 and December 2020 using Ontario Drug Benefit data. We completed an interrupted time-series analysis to estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) on the monthly proportion of on-time denosumab doses (183 +/-30d). Analyses were stratified by user type: patients due for their second dose (novice users), third or fourth dose (intermediate users), or≥5th dose (established users). In additional analyses, we considered patients living in nursing homes, switching to other osteoporosis drugs, and reported trends until February 2022. We studied 148 554 patients (90.9% female, mean [SD] age 79.6 [8.0] yr) receiving 648 221 denosumab doses. The average pre-pandemic proportion of on-time therapy was steady in the community, yet differed by user type: 64.9% novice users, 72.3% intermediate users, and 78.0% established users. We identified an immediate overall decline in the proportion of on-time doses across all user types at the start of the pandemic: -17.8% (95% CI, -19.6, -16.0). In nursing homes, the pre-pandemic proportion of on-time therapy was similar across user types (average 83.5%), with a small decline at the start of the pandemic: -3.2% (95% CI, -5.0, -1.2). On-time therapy returned to pre-pandemic levels by October 2020 and was not impacted by therapy switching. Although on-time dosing remains stable as of February 2022, approximately one-fourth of patients in the community do not receive denosumab on-time. In conclusion, although pandemic disruptions to denosumab dosing were temporary, levels of on-time therapy remain suboptimal.

Risk Factors for Residual Back Pain After Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a method for the management of osteoporotic vertebral body fracture (OVF). However, improvement in back pain (BP) is poor in some patients, also previous reports have not elucidated the exact incidence and risk factors for residual BP after BKP. We clarified the characteristics of residual BP after BKP in patients with OVF. In this study, we hypothesize that some risk factors may exist for residual BP 2years after the treatment of OVF with BKP. A multicenter cohort study was performed where patients who received BKP within 2months of OVF injury were followed-up for 2years. BP at 6months after surgery and final observation was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Patients with a score of 40mm or more were allocated to the residual BP group, and comparisons between the residual back pain group and the improved group were made for bone density, kyphosis, mobility of the fractured vertebral body, total spinal column alignment, and fracture type (fracture of the posterior element, pedicle fracture, presence or absence of posterior wall damage, etc.). Also, Short Form 36 (SF-36) for physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) at the final follow-up was evaluated in each radiological finding. Of 116 cases, 79 (68%) were followed-up for 2years. Two years after the BKP, 26 patients (33%) experienced residual BP. Neither age nor sex differed between the groups. In addition, there was no difference in bone mineral density, BKP intervention period (period from onset to BKP), and osteoporosis drug use. However, the preoperative height ratio of the vertebral body was significantly worse in the residual BP group (39.8% vs. 52.1%; p = 0.007). Two years after the operation, the vertebral body wedge angle was significantly greater in the residual BP group (15.7° vs. 11.9°; p = 0.042). In the multiple logistic regression model with a preoperative vertebral body height ratio of 50% or less [calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve], the adjusted odds ratio for residual BP was 6.58 (95% confidence interval 1.64-26.30; p = 0.007); similarly, patients with vertebral body height ratio less than 50% had a lower score of SF-36 PCS 24.6 vs. 32.2 p = 0.08. The incidence of residual BP 2years after BKP was 33% in the current study. The risk factor for residual BP after BKP was a preoperative vertebral body height ratio of 50% or less, which should be attentively assessed for the selection of a proper treatment scheme and to provide adequate stabilization. III.