Drug-eluting Stents Research Articles

Correlation between the Atherogenic Index of Plasma and Progression of Non-target Lesion Vascular Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention using Drug-eluting Stents.

To examine the correlation between Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) levels and the progression of non-target lesion vascular disease following the deployment of Drug-eluting Stents (DES). We retrospectively enrolled patients who had undergone successful treatment for CAD with DES and subsequently underwent a coronary angiography follow-up at the Cardiology Department of Tianjin Third Central Hospital from January 2017 to July 2022. The annual change in Gensini Score (GS) was calculated according to two angiographic evaluations in order to assess the progression of non-target lesion vascular disease; a change greater than 1 indicated progression, while a change of 1 or less indicated stability. AIP was calculated according to serum lipid parameters. Multivariate Logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between AIP level and progression of non-target coronary artery lesions. The ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of AIP for coronary artery non-target lesion vascular disease progression. Out of the 344 patients who were monitored over a median duration of 1.2 years, 113 exhibited progression of non-target lesion vascular disease. Initially, baseline AIP levels were notably higher in the progression group compared to the non-progression group (0.30 [0.14, 0.43] vs. 0.11 [-0.06, 0.31]), and this difference remained significant during the follow-up period (0.19 [0.06, 0.34] vs. 0.11 [-0.06, 0.22]). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that AIP is an independent predictor for the progression of non-target lesion vascular disease following DES treatment. Individuals in the highest tertile of AIP faced a considerably elevated risk compared to those in the lowest tertile (OR = 4.88, 95% CI: 2.12-11.21, P < 0.001). Moreover, utilizing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a 0.15 AIP level cut-off was determined for diagnosing disease progression, with a sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 56.7%, and an area under the curve of 0.672 (95% CI: 0.613-0.731, P < 0.01). AIP significantly correlates with the progression of non-target lesion vascular disease among patients with coronary artery disease who have undergone DES treatment, establishing itself as an independent risk factor in addition to conventional predictors.

Non-target lesion progression: Unveiling critical predictors and outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis

BackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the primary treatment for coronary artery disease. However, while PCI effectively addresses severe stenosis or occlusive lesions in target vessels, the progression of non-target vessel plaque remains a critical determinant of long-term patient prognosis. AimsThe purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of non-target vascular plaque progression on prognosis after PCI for ISR. MethodsThis study included 195 patients diagnosed with ISR and multivessel disease who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement, along with intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of the culprit stent. Subsequent rechecked coronary angiography categorized eligible patients into non-target lesion progression (N-TLP) and no-N-TLP groups. We evaluated the baseline morphological characteristics of N-TLP by OCT and investigated the relationship between N-TLP, non-culprit vessel-related major adverse cardiovascular events (NCV-MACE), and pan-vascular disease-related clinical events (PVD-CE) incidence. ResultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (OR 3.616, 95% CI: 1.735–7.537; P = 0.001), uric acid level (OR 1.005, 95% CI: 1.001–1.009; P = 0.006), in-stent neoatherosclerosis (ISNA) (OR 1.334, 95% CI: 1.114–1.985; P = 0.047) and heterogeneous neointima morphology (OR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.18–5.43; P = 0.019) were independent predictors for N-TLP. Furthermore, N-TLP was associated with a high incidence of NCV-MACE (19.4% vs 6.9%, P = 0.009) and PVD-CE (83.9% [95% CI: 79.7%–88.3%] vs 93.1% [95% CI: 88.4%–98.0%], P = 0.038) after PCI in ISR patients. ConclusionDiabetes, uric acid levels, ISNA, and heterogeneous neointima are predictive factors for subsequent rapid plaque progression, with N-TLP exacerbating the incidence of NCV-MACE and PVD-CE after PCI.

Abstract 4137019: Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Despite the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) in preventing restenosis, many patients still experience DES restenosis. Neointimal hyperplasia and neoatherosclerosis can develop within these stents, leading to recurrent coronary syndromes. Hypothesis: Repeated stenting with DES is limited by additional metal layers, the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, and heightened risks of stent thrombosis. Locally acting drugs with sustained efficacy may prevent this progression. Paclitaxel delivery via contrast medium or drug-coated balloon catheters could exert antiproliferative effects, reducing neointimal proliferation. Aims: To synthesize existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons versus Uncoated Balloons in coronary in-stent restenosis. Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science) to identify eligible studies reported up to March 23, 2024. Using R version 4.4.0, we reported outcomes as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MD) and confidence intervals (CIs). This review has been registered and published in PROSPERO (CRD42024527412). Results: The meta-analysis included a total of six trials with 1,541 patients. PCB significantly reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction (RR 0.65, 95% CI [0.42, 1.00], p = 0.052), stent thrombosis (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08, to 0.83], p = 0.023), major adverse cardiac events (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.25, to 0.42], P &lt; 0.001), target lesion revascularization (RR 0.34, 95% CI [0.14, 0.84], p &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were observed between PCB and UCB regarding cardiac-related mortality, target vessel revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention, all-cause death, Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, and target vessel failure. Conclusion: PCB for ISR significantly reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction, MACE, and stent thrombosis compared to UCB.

Abstract 4137895: Serum High-density Lipoprotein-Associated Paraoxonase-1 Levels Predict Recurrent Cardiovascular Events after Stent Implantation in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris

Background: Poor clinical outcomes for patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation have been reported. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is well-established as a negative risk factor for coronary artery disease, and its anti-oxidant property has been attributed mainly to the HDL-bound enzyme paraoxonase-1 (PON-1). Myeloperoxidase (MPO), a pro-oxidant enzyme released from activated neutrophils, has been shown to alter the atheroprotective function of HDL to a dysfunctional form. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between plasma MPO and serum PON-1 levels after implantation of DES in patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) with and without HD. Methods: Serum PON-1 concentrations and PON-arylesterase activity were measured in 183 patients with SAP after DES implantation (HD group, n=37; non-HD group, n=146) with a sandwich ELISA method. Cardiovascular events were defined as sudden cardiac death, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction and other non-fatal events including unstable angina pectoris or coronary revascularization. Results: Serum PON-1 concentrations and PON-arylesterase activity were significantly lower in the HD group than in the non-HD group (PON-1 concentrations, P&lt;0.0001; PON-arylesterase activity, P&lt;0.0001). In addition, plasma MPO in patients undergoing HD were significantly higher than in patients not undergoing HD (P&lt;0.0001). Moreover, plasma MPO showed a significant inverse correlation with serum PON-1 concentrations and PON-arylesterase activity (concentration: R= -0.24, P=0.0013; arylesterase-activity: R=-0.24, P=0.0014). Cardiovascular event rates were significantly higher in the HD group than in the non-HD group (67.6% vs. 43.8%, P&lt;0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the low-PON-1 group (&lt;58.0 mg/mL, median) had a significantly worse outcome than the high-PON-1 group ( P =0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that a low serum PON-1 concentration was the only independent predictor of cardiovascular events (odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 3.40, P =0.024). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that plasma MPO have a significant inverse correlation with PON-1 in patients undergoing HD and suggest that an imbalance between pro-oxidants and anti-oxidants may contribute to the progression and destabilization of human coronary atherosclerotic lesions in patients with SAP who undergo HD following DES implantation.

Abstract 4121530: Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred revascularization strategy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Drug-eluting stents (DES) are linked to higher risks of stent restenosis and stent thrombosis when implanted for AMI. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) provide a high concentration of anti-proliferative drugs over the target lesion without using the polymeric stent structures. The current literature comparing DCB to DES for AMI PCI is limited. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on the major electronic databases for studies comparing DCB to DES for AMI PCI. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were pooled using a random-effects model, and a p-value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 8 studies with 1401 AMI patients were included (545: DCB and 856: DES). The pooled analysis demonstrated that DCB was associated with significantly lower mean lumen diameter on follow-up [MD: -0.26; 95% CI: -0.47, -0.05; p=0.02] compared to DES. However, there was no statistically significant difference in mean in-stent late lumen loss [MD: 0.07; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.18], cardiovascular mortality [OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.35, 2.34], all-cause mortality [OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.25, 2.63], myocardial infarction [OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.36, 2.45], major adverse cardiovascular events [OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.47, 2.00], target lesion revascularization [OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 0.52, 4.87], and stent thrombosis [OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.05, 4.94]. Conclusion: In patients with AMI, PCI using DCB leads to a significant reduction in the minimum lumen diameter on follow-up compared to DES. No statistically significant difference was noted in mean in-stent late lumen loss, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Further trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Abstract 4120583: Long term Safety and Efficacy of Ultrathin Bioabsorbable polymer sirolimus eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable polymer everolimus eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A systematic review and meta analysis

Background: First generation drug eluting stents (DES) with thick polymers may contribute to local vascular inflammation and late stent thrombosis. Thinner-strut DES (ultrathin), particularly those with biodegradable polymers, aim to reduce this risk by minimizing flow disturbance and vascular injury. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of ultrathin biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting stents (BP-SES) compared to durable polymer everolimus eluting stents (DP-EES) are still uncertain. Thus, we performed a meta analysis to compare outcomes of these two stents. Methods: Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials comparing ultrathin BP SES and thin DP EES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with long term follow-up of at least 3 years. We excluded cohort studies, case reports, editorials, conference abstracts, and animal studies. Primary outcomes were target lesion failure (TLF), cardiac death (CD), target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR). We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus. Cochrane’s ROB 2.0 tool assessed trial quality, and RevMan software (5.4) performed the meta-analysis. Results: Our analysis included ten RCTs, totaling 16,216 patients, with 9,108 in the BP SES group and 7,108 in the DP EES group. TLF occurred in 905 patients (9.94%) in the BP-SES group and 821 patients (11.55%) in the DP-EES group, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.01, p = 0.08). Additionally, there were no significant differences in cardiac death (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.19, p = 1.00), TV-MI (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.05, p = 0.19), and CI-TLR (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.01, p = 0.06) between the two groups. Conclusion: The use of BP-SES did not result in higher rates of TLF, CD, TV-MI, or CI-TLR compared to DP-DES. These findings suggest that both BP-SES and DP-DES are viable options for PCI procedures, with comparable long-term safety profiles. However, some trials used strut thicknesses exceeding 70µm in cases requiring wider diameters, similar to the strut thickness in the DP-EES group. This makes it challenging to assess whether, in addition to biodegradable polymers, lower strut thickness contributes to reducing target lesion-related events. Further research may be needed to explore other relevant outcomes and to confirm these findings in diverse patient populations.

Abstract 4124070: Dual-action Nanomatrix Coated Stent for Improving Endothelialization while Suppressing Restenosis and Inflammation

Introduction: The most common cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is atherosclerosis. The progression of atherosclerosis is characterized by endothelial cell dysfunction, proliferation of smooth muscle cell proliferation, and plaques which lead to progressive arterial stenosis. Bare metal stents (BMS) were developed to hinder stenosis, but re-stenosis has been observed following deployment. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been developed to mitigate this, by releasing anti-proliferative drugs to suppress smooth muscle cell proliferation. However, these drugs also suppress endothelial growth. To address this, we are developing and evaluating a dual action nanomatrix coated stent comprised of a nitric oxide (NO) releasing peptide amphiphile (PA) and everolimus-encapsulated liposomes to improve endothelial proliferation and suppressing smooth muscle cell proliferation and inflammation. Materials and Methods: The nanomatrix coating contains a PA generated via solid phase peptide synthesis consisting of a nitric oxide donor and a cell adhesive ligand. The everolimus-encapsulated liposomes were prepared with DPPC, DOTAP, DSPE-PEG, and cholesterol via thin film rehydration, followed by encapsulation with everolimus. TEM was performed on liposomes to assess their stability. The release kinetics were evaluated via UV-vis of samples containing released everolimus. To evaluate the dual effect of the nanomatrix coating on metabolism, NO and everolimus were used to treat endothelial and smooth muscle cells, and an MTT assay was done. Results and Discussion: TEM showed that liposomes maintained stability over time. It was found that 60% of everolimus was released by day 30. The MTT assay showed that NO with everolimus increased endothelial cell metabolic activity and maintained or lowered smooth muscle cell activity compared to everolimus alone. Conclusions: Everolimus-encapsulated liposomes have potential as an effective delivery method of everolimus. NO and everolimus have a synergistic effect of improving endothelial function and suppressing smooth muscle cells.

Abstract 4114293: Impact of stent length on long-term clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents

Background: Stent length has been considered an important predictor of adverse events in stable patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there are few data in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients treated with very long drug-eluting stents (DES). We conducted this study to evaluate the impact of stent length on the long-term clinical outcomes. Method: The study included a total of 9,021 AMI patients who underwent PCI with 2 nd generation DESs. The patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the stent length: group A (&lt;38mm, n=6821), group B (38 – 59mm, n=1735) and group C (≥60mm, n=465) and compared using the inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) method. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) up to 3years. Results: After adjustment for baseline differences, stent length was still significantly associated with higher cumulative rates of MACE [Odd ration(OR) :1.15 for 38 -59mm group, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.26, p= 0.001, OR 1.23 for ≧ 60mm group, 95% CI: 1.13 -1.34, p&lt; 0.001], especially, non-target vessel revascularization (TVR), not TVR, (table). In subgroup analysis, 3-year TVR according to stent length, Biolimus A9 stent was associated with TVR in patient with more than 38-59mm stent (OR 6.50, 95% CI: 2.60 to 16.26, p 〈 0.001). Conclusion: Even in the 2 nd generation DES era, stent length was associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes in patients with AMI. Interestingly, long stent implantation did not affect target vessel failure but non-TVR.

Abstract 4123480: Navigating Aspirin Allergy With Rapid Desensitization In A Patient Requiring Urgent Coronary Intervention

Introduction: Aspirin (ASA) hypersensitivity is a challenge in determining the appropriate, cost-effective therapy in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various ASA desensitization protocols were studied and showed favorable outcomes. In this case, we highlight the use of rapid ASA desensitization protocols for patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post urgent PCI. Case: A 52-year-old male presented with severe left-sided chest pain associated with diaphoresis. He had a history of allergic reaction to ASA at the age of 18 years with swelling of the face and throat without shortness of breath or hypotension. Physical examination was unremarkable except for tachycardia. Workup showed no ECG abnormalities but significantly elevated, uptrending high sensitivity troponin. Medical management included clopidogrel load, heparin drip, and nitropaste for persistent pain. Urgent coronary angiography showed a severe bifurcating lesion in the LCx and OM1 arteries, successfully treated with the T stent technique using a drug-eluting stent. He received cilostazol and prasugrel, overlapped with a tirofiban drip post PCI. ASA desensitization was performed with oral ASA every 90 minutes for four doses (Figure). Vital signs were monitored every 30, 60, and 90 minutes after each dose. He was discharged home with no reported symptoms on follow up. Discussion: DAPT with ASA and oral P2Y12 inhibitors is recommended for patients with PCI. ASA desensitization could be considered for patients who are intolerant to ASA. Major clinical ASA desensitization protocols, like in ADAPTED and SCRIPPS studies, showed good outcomes in major adverse cardiovascular events. However, one limitation of these widely used protocols is the prolonged time required to achieve desensitization. The rapid protocol used in our patient who did not have ASA exacerbated respiratory disease showed effectiveness with shorter hospital stay. Conclusion: ASA desensitization is an appropriate option for patients with a history of ASA allergy requiring DAPT. Rapid desensitization protocols are associated with shorter hospitalization courses, and future efforts should evaluate their effectiveness in randomized controlled trials.

Abstract 4142793: Development of an Angiography-Based Multimodal AI Model for Predicting the risk of In-Stent Restenosis

Background: Despite advances in Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), 5-10% of patients still experience in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which generates significant financial burden and elevates the risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and rehospitalization. Thus, early identification of patients at high risk for ISR is crucial for guiding clinical stratification and early intervention. Aims: To develop and validate a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) model based on coronary angiography images for predicting ISR risk in patients post-DES implantation. Methods: To establish an accurate predictive model, our approach begins with the pre-training on 100,000 angiographic images to enhance the model’s capability in recognizing image features. Subsequently, we employ the DenseNet architecture as the primary deep learning model, incorporating angiographic images from 2,000 cases of DES-treated de novo lesions—1,000 from patients who did not experience ISR within two years and 1,000 from those who did. A multivariate logistic regression analysis, including radiomic features, clinical baselines, and functional information, constructs the predictive model. Additionally, a separate prospective cohort of 300 cases was assembled for validation to simulate real-world application and to verify the model's reliability and accuracy. Results: Our study successfully developed an AI prediction model for ISR, utilizing a large cohort of coronary angiography images, which effectively predicts ISR with high accuracy. Leveraging the DenseNet architecture and finely tuned machine learning algorithms, the model achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 90% in the validation cohort. The ROC curve from the test phase demonstrated an AUC above 0.90, underscoring the model’s exceptional diagnostic capabilities. Furthermore, the implementation of this model in a prospective cohort confirmed its reliability and practical utility in real-world clinical settings. Conclusions: This study introduces the first multimodal AI model using angiographic imaging to predict ISR. By demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy and reliability in real-world settings, this model serves as an essential tool for early ISR detection and intervention, ultimately helping to reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and mortality.

Abstract 4119470: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction as a Complication of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

Description of Case: A 19-year-old female with history of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) presented to the emergency department after a syncopal episode at a concert. She reported a prodrome of feeling hot and dizzy prior to the event, followed by epigastric discomfort, nausea, and vomiting after regaining consciousness. She had been diagnosed with GPA one year prior to presentation based on serology and biopsy results. Because her disease was felt to be well-controlled on azathioprine, she had been tapered off of prednisone one month prior to presentation. Initial vitals included blood pressure of 90/60 mmHg, and heart rate of 94 bpm. A 12-lead EKG revealed ST segment elevation in leads I, II and aVF with T wave inversions in the lateral leads ( Figure 1 ). Initial bloodwork was notable for troponin I of 0.11ng/mL (upper limit of normal 0.034 ng/mL). A diagnosis of inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction was made. She was treated with oral aspirin and prasugrel load as well as intravenous heparin and taken urgently to the catheterization laboratory. Diagnostic coronary angiography was significant for single vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) of the right coronary artery (RCA), with acute complete occlusion of the mid-RCA ( Figure 2A-B ). She was treated successfully with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and implant of two overlapping drug eluting stents in the mid-RCA ( Figure 2C ). Discussion: GPA is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) that predominantly affects small to medium sized vessels in the respiratory tract and kidneys. Cardiovascular manifestations in GPA are uncommon, but include pericarditis, myocarditis, and coronary arteritis. GPA can affect the coronary arteries either primarily through inflammatory changes in the arterial wall or via systemic inflammation leading to accelerated atherosclerosis. No standardized criteria exist to establish the diagnosis of coronary arteritis and to differentiate it from accelerated atherosclerosis. Long-term treatment of vasculitis patients with coronary involvement is also poorly supported by evidence. Optimization of cardiovascular risk factors is advocated as per standard of care, and vasculitis control may slow disease progression. This case not only raises awareness of cardiac complications in GPA, but highlights the current lack of evidence surrounding secondary prevention in young patients with vasculitis and cardiac complications.

Abstract 4124335: Ticagrelor monotherapy the way forward after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions : An updated meta-analysis

Background: With the advent of newer generation drug eluting stents, the chorus for shortening the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is getting louder and louder. Ticagrelor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT has been studied in a few randomized controlled trials with promising results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the ticagrelor monotherapy with DAPT after short duration DAPT in patients undergoing PCIs. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for RCTs comparing ticagrelor monotherapy to DAPT after PCI and reported the outcomes of Major Adverse Cardiac Events including death, myocardial infarction or stroke (MACE); Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis or target vessel revascularization (MACCE); Major bleeding; Death from any cause; CV death; Stent thrombosis and Target vessel revascularization (TVR). Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager Web (Cochrane Collaboration). Heterogeneity was examined with I 2 test. Results: Out of 3208 database results, 5 RCTs with 32,393 patients were included; 16,188 (50%) received Ticagrelor monotherapy. Studies had mean follow-up ranging from 12 months to 24 months. Baseline characteristics are as per Table 1. Safety endpoints of major bleeding (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.38-0.66; p &lt; 0.0001; I 2 = 23 %; Figure 1A), was significantly less with ticagrelor monotherapy. Efficacy endpoints of MACE, MACCE, Death from any cause, CV Death, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stent thrombosis were not significantly different between ticagrelor and DAPT (Figure 1 and 2). Conclusion: Ticagrelor monotherapy reduces major bleeding as compared to continued DAPT for 12 months after PCI. Major ischemic outcomes were similar in both groups. Ticagrelor monotherapy may be the way forward after short duration of DAPT in patients undergoing PCI.

Abstract 4138792: A Case of Right Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion in a Transplanted Heart: To Stent or Not to Stent?

Background: Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) is commonly seen in transplanted hearts. Due to the absence of innervation, many transplanted patients have no symptoms despite extensive disease. This poses a challenge in deciding when to perform coronary interventions. We present a case of significant CAV on surveillance angiogram that posed a challenge in management. Case: A 67-year-old female presented for her fifth surveillance coronary angiography nine and a half years after her heart transplant. The angiogram revealed ostial right coronary artery (RCA) chronic total occlusion (CTO) with left-to-right collaterals as well as diffuse irregularities in the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex arteries. The patient was asymptomatic and two years prior to that, her angiogram revealed no significant disease. Biopsies for the past nine years showed no evidence of allograft rejection. She was subsequently referred for coronary intervention. Due to concern of CTO being a sign of rapidly progressing CAV, it was decided to undergo revascularization of the RCA. Antegrade approach was performed with guidance from contralateral injections. Three overlapping drug-eluting stents were deployed proximally-distally using intravascular ultrasound guidance. Surveillance angiography nine months later showed patent RCA stents with no significant disease otherwise. Eighteen months later, angiography demonstrated CTO of the mid LAD and patent RCA stents with mild in-stent restenosis in the most distal RCA stent. The patient remained asymptomatic. Discussion: CAV develops in fifty percent of transplanted hearts within 10 years and requires close surveillance. In this case, revascularization of the RCA CTO resulted in maintaining graft function for at least two additional years as the development of LAD CTO may have resulted in graft failure had the RCA CTO not been intervened upon. CTO revascularization in CAV has the potential to prolong graft viability and delay the need for re-transplantation. Further studies related to CTO revascularization, especially in asymptomatic transplanted patients, are needed to understand the impact on morbidity and mortality in this patient population.

A U-shaped relationship between the atherogenic index of plasma and repeated target vessel revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective study

BackgroundAtherogenic index of plasma (AIP) has been recognized as a novel and practical marker for the assessment of cardiometabolic risk, but the relevance of AIP as a prognostic biomarker in coronary artery disease (CAD) remains debated. This study investigated the association between AIP and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in CAD patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES).MethodsA total of 2,250 patients undergoing PCI with DES were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was MACCEs, encompassing acute myocardial infarction, repeat target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and all-cause mortality. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Restricted cubic splines were applied to explore the dose–response associations. And subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate potential relationship between AIP and MACCEs across different subgroups.ResultsDuring a medium follow-up of 29.8 (25.6–34.0) months, 106 (4.7%) patients experienced TVR. After adjusting for confounders, AIP (per 1 SD increase) was positively associated with TVR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–1.58, P = 0.042). In females, there was a significant association (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.40–3.98, P = 0.002), but no significant association was observed in males. There was an interaction between AIP and gender (P = 0.017). Restricted cubic spline analysis depicted a U-shaped relationship between AIP and TVR (Pnonlinear = 0.016), with an elevated risk evident from an AIP of 0.20.ConclusionAIP showed a U-shaped relationship with TVR in PCI patients with DES, particularly pronounced among females. We suggested that the AIP should be used as a plasma marker of key interest for preventing TVR after DES implantation in patients with CAD.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer-Coated Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Real-World Post-Marketing Study.

Long-term clinical data on biodegradable-polymer (BP) drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the BP-DES SYNERGY compared to XIENCE V, a durable-polymer (DP)-DES. We compared patients treated with BP-DES or DP-DES at our center from 2008 to 2020. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, Q-wave MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST). A total of 4255 patients underwent propensity-score matching, and 380 patients from each cohort were matched. There was no significant difference between BP-DES and DP-DES concerning MACE (5-year estimates: 21.6% vs. 26.6%, log-rank p = 0.259). Furthermore, there was no difference in the TLR rate (5-year estimates: 7.3% vs. 8.6%, log-rank p = 0.781). All-cause death (5-year estimates: 13.6% vs. 12.9%, log-rank p = 0.72) and Q-wave MI (5-year estimates: 0.53% vs. 1.7%, log-rank p = 0.427) were also comparable between the two groups. Of note, the rate of very late ST was very low and similar between the groups (5-year estimates: 0.26% vs. 0.64%, log-rank p = 0.698). BP-DES and DP-DES demonstrate similar safety and efficacy at 5-year follow-up. Both can be used for the effective treatment of coronary artery disease.

Outcome of Coronary Edge In-stent Restenosis Management by Restenting Versus Drug-Eluting Balloon

Abstract Background: The optimal therapeutic strategy for coronary intervention in edge in-stent restenosis (edge ISR) remains less well-defined. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess 12-month outcomes of re-stenting using drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus using drug-eluting balloon (DEB) for managing coronary edge ISR. Patients and Methods: One hundred and four patients with edge ISR were randomly assigned to either DES or DEB. The primary endpoint was stent failure at 12-month follow-up. Results: Significantly lower target vessel revascularization among the DEB group compared to restenting group, (7.7% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.04). Likewise, target vessel-related myocardial infarction rate was significantly lower among the DEB group than restenting (5.7% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.04). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the rates of deaths or restenosis between the two groups. Conclusion: The DEB is superior to the DES with better both safety and efficacy.

Complete versus culprit-only coronary revascularization in patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis.

Recently, the FFR-Guidance for Complete Nonculprit Revascularization (FULL REVASC) trial in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multiple vessel disease (MVD) did not show differences in the composite endpoint of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization than culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at 4.8 years, although complete revascularization is a recommendation IA in current guidelines. We want to determine through an updated meta-analysis whether complete revascularization is associated with decreased mortality and hard clinical endpoints compared to culprit lesion only PCI. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from January 1990 to April 2024 using the terms "percutaneous coronary intervention" combined with "non culprit lesions" or "culprit lesion" or "complete revascularization" or "incomplete revascularization." Additionally, a "snowball search" was conducted. Only randomized clinical trials (RCT) reporting mortality, re-infarction or new revascularization after at least 12 months and using predominantly drug eluting stents were included. The summary effect of different revascularization strategies on cardiovascular endpoints was estimated and measures of effect size were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Eight RCT involving 9515 patients were included, with a follow-up range between 12 months and 4.8 years. Main findings show that culprit lesion revascularization was associated with an increased risk of MI (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.81, I2 42%) and ischemia-guided revascularization (OR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.86 to 4.26, I2 80%) compared to complete revascularization, without differences in overall mortality (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.36, I2 2%). In patients with STEMI and MVD without cardiogenic shock, our metanalysis showed that complete revascularization with PCI significantly reduced the risk of non-fatal myocardial reinfarction and ischemic-driven revascularization compared to culprit vessel-only revascularization, without differences in overall mortality.

Features of acute coronary syndrome after a COVID-19 in the aspect of pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND: After recovery from COVID-19 patients may develop new risk factors that lead to changes in cardiopulmonary interactions, i.e. an increase in the afterload on the right ventricle due to increased pressure in the pulmonary artery and change in pulmonary vascular resistance. It can be assumed that the presence of such a spectrum of problems can influence the severity of dyspnea and the development of pathogenetic events (pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular failure, subendocardial ischemia), which in turn can determine the outcome. AIM: To identify the characteristics of acute coronary syndrome after a COVID-19, taking into account angiographic data on coronary artery lesions and hemodynamic manifestations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative analysis of the clinical and hemodynamic consequences of the COVID-19 and the development of acute coronary syndrome in 157 patients was carried out. The group 1 included 69 patients who had had COVID-19 (vaccinated — 24.6%) during the 6 months preceding acute coronary syndrome; group 2 — 88 patients without a history of COVID-19 (vaccinated — 42%). The 12-lead electrocardiogram has been used in the diagnosis of subendocardial ischemia in acute coronary syndrome. The ST segment displacement in lead aVR was analyzed. RESULTS: After COVID-19, dispnoe occurred in 52% of the patients and in 14.8% without previous infection. Echocardiographic signs of right ventricular overload were present in 42% of the patients in group 1 and 10.2% in group 2. The mean pressure in the pulmonary artery was increased after COVID-19 in 58% of the patients in group 1 and in 10.2% of group 2 in the range from 20 to 24 mm Hg and in the range from 25 to 36 mm Hg in 29% of the patients in group 1 and 2.3% of the patients in group 2. The average value of left ventricular ejection fraction in the patients who had had COVID-19 was 55.9 ± 14%, which was less than in the patients in the control group (63.2 ± 5.5%; p 0.001). ST segment elevation in lead aVr indicated high incidence of subendocardial ischemia. 40.6% in group 1, and 11.4% in group 2 (χ2 = 17.9; p 0.001); in group 1 vaccinated — 17.6%, and not vaccinated — 48.1% (χ2 = 4.9; p = 0.027), in group 2 vaccinated — 8.1%, and not vaccinated — 13.7% (χ2 = 0.7; p = 0.41). All the patients had drug-eluting stents implanted in the infarct-related artery. After stenting, no recurrence of pain or further increase in chest pain was observed. CONCLUSIONS: After coronavirus infection COVID-19, 58% of patients have increased mean pressure in the pulmonary artery in the range from 20 to 24 mm Hg and in the range from 25 to 36 mm Hg in 29%. Atherothrombosis is the main mechanism of acute coronary syndrome after COVID-19 coronavirus infection. The main feature of acute coronary syndrome after a coronavirus infection COVID-19 is increased pressure in the pulmonary artery after a lung injury, which must be taken into account when planning surgical treatment tactics and management tactics in the postoperative period.

Impact of a Chronic Total Occlusion on Outcomes After FFR-Guided PCI or Coronary Bypass Surgery: A FAME 3 Substudy.

The clinical impact of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease undergoing fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with current-generation drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unclear. The FAME 3 trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 3) compared fractional flow reserve-guided PCI with CABG in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 1 year. In this substudy, the 3-year outcomes were analyzed in patients with or without a CTO. Of the patients randomized to PCI or CABG in the FAME 3 trial, 305 (21%) had a CTO. In the PCI arm, revascularization of the CTO was attempted in 61% with a procedural success rate of 88%. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 3 years was not significantly different between those with or without a CTO in both the PCI (15.2% versus 20.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.38-1.03]; P=0.07) and the CABG (13.0% versus 12.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.55-1.66]; P=0.88) arms. In those without a CTO, PCI was associated with a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events compared with CABG (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.20-2.17]; P<0.01) but not in those with a CTO (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.64-2.28]; P=0.56; Pinteraction=0.31). The presence of a CTO did not significantly impact the treatment effect of PCI versus CABG at 3 years in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02100722.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in symptomatic intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis: a meta-analysis

ObjectivesThis study aims to present the first comprehensive meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in treating intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis.MethodsA comprehensive examination was undertaken to compare the effectiveness and safety of DES and BMS in individuals experiencing symptomatic stenosis in the intracranial and vertebral arteries through an in-depth analysis of clinical research. We conducted an extensive search across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2024. The emphasis of our investigation was on various outcomes including rates of in-stent restenosis, symptomatic occurrences of in-stent restenosis, incidence of stroke, procedural success, mortality rates, complications associated with the procedure, and any adverse events.ResultsOur analysis included 12 studies with a total of 1,243 patients (562 in the DES group and 681 in the BMS group). The findings demonstrated a significantly lower rate of in-stent restenosis in the DES group for both intracranial [odds ratio (OR): 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13 to 0.41; p &amp;lt; 0.00001] and vertebral artery stenosis (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.72; p = 0.003) compared to the BMS group. Additionally, the DES group showed a significantly reduced rate of postoperative strokes in vertebral artery stenosis cases (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.90; p = 0.03), with no significant differences noted in the intracranial artery stenosis comparison (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.95; p = 0.42). The study also revealed no significant disparities in symptomatic in-stent restenosis, procedural success, mortality, adverse effects, and perioperative complications between the two groups across the conditions studied.ConclusionThe comparison indicates that DES significantly reduces the risk of in-stent restenosis and postoperative strokes in patients with vertebral artery stenosis, compared to BMS. For both intracranial and vertebral artery stenosis, DES and BMS exhibit comparable safety profiles.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=439967.