Drug-eluting Beads Research Articles

Gemcitabine-Loaded Microbeads for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Rabbit Renal Tumor Monitored by 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/X-Ray Computed Tomography Imaging

Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop the gemcitabine-loaded drug-eluting beads (G-DEBs) for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in rabbit renal tumors and to evaluate their antitumor effect using 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/X-ray computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Methods: DEBs were prepared by polyvinyl alcohol-based macromer crosslinked with N-acryl tyrosine and N,N′-methylenebis(acrylamide). Gemcitabine was loaded through ion change to obtain G-DEBs. Their particle size and drug release profile were characterized. VX2 tumors were implanted in the right kidney of rabbits to establish the renal tumor model. The tumor-bearing rabbits received pre-scan by 18F-FDG PET/CT, followed by targeted transarterial injection of G-DEBs under digital subtraction angiography (DSA) guidance. The rabbits received another 18F-FDG PET/CT scan 10 or 14 days after the treatment. The therapeutic effect was further validated by histopathological analysis of the dissected tumors. Results: The average particle size of the microspheres was 58.06 ± 0.50 µm, and the polydisperse index was 0.26 ± 0.002. The maximum loading rate of G-DEBs was 18.09 ± 0.35%, with almost 100% encapsulation efficiency. Within 24 h, GEM was eluted from G-DEBs rapidly and completely, and more than 20% was released in different media. DSA illustrated that G-DEBs were delivered to rabbit renal tumors. Compared with the untreated control group with increased tumor volume and intense 18F -FDG uptake, the G-DEBs group showed significant reductions in tumor volume and maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) 10 or 14 days after the treatment. Histopathological analysis confirmed that the proliferating area of tumor cells was significantly reduced in the G-DEBs group. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that G-DEBs are effective in TACE treatment of rabbit VX2 renal tumors, and 18F-FDG PET/CT provides a non-invasive imaging modality to monitor the antitumor effects of TACE in renal tumors.

Complete contrast staining of hepatocellular carcinoma during drug-eluting bead chemoembolization predicts a favorable response.

The objective of this study was to evaluate complete contrast staining (CCS) of HCC during drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEBTACE) first session for response prediction. Forty-one patients with solitary HCC who underwent DEBTACE were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups based on contrast staining of HCC using two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy during the first session of DEBTACE. Both groups underwent one or two sessions of DEBTACE to achieve a complete response. Responses were evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A comparison of the complete response between the CCS and non-CCS groups was performed, and the prediction value was studied. CCS in 2D fluoroscopy during the first session of drug-eluting bead chemoembolization was observed in 22 (53.7%) patients. Well-defined HCC and super-selective chemoembolization were significantly associated with CCS. Complete response was observed in 54.54%, 90%, and 95.45% of CCS patient groups after the first session, second session, and cumulative sessions of TACE, respectively. Complete responses were 10.52%, 29.41%, and 36.84% in the non-CCS group after the first, second, and cumulative sessions of TACE, respectively. CCS of HCC using 2D fluoroscopy during DEBTACE is a predictor of a favorable response after two sessions of treatment.

Clinical study of different interventional treatments for primary hepatocellular carcinoma based on propensity-score matching

BACKGROUND Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the main treatment for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC) who miss the opportunity to undergo surgery. Conventional TACE (c-TACE) uses iodized oil as an embolic agent, which is easily washed by blood and affects its efficacy. Drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) can sustainably release chemotherapeutic drugs and has a long embolization time. However, the clinical characteristics of patients before the two types of interventional therapies may differ, possibly affecting the conclusion. Only a few studies have compared these two interventions using propensity-score matching (PSM). AIM To analyze the clinical effects of DEB-TACE and c-TACE on patients with PHC based on PSM. METHODS Patients with PHC admitted to Dangyang People’s Hospital (March 2020 to March 2024) were retrospectively enrolled and categorized into groups A (DEB-TACE, n = 125) and B (c-TACE, n = 106). Sex, age, Child-Pugh grade, tumor-node-metastasis stage, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score were selected for 1:1 PSM. Eighty-six patients each were included post-matching. Clinical efficacy, liver function indices (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and albumin), tumor serum markers, and adverse reactions were compared between the groups. RESULTS The objective response and disease control rates were significantly higher in group A (80.23% and 97.67%, respectively) than in group B (60.47% and 87.21%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Post-treatment levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were lower in group A than in group B (P < 0.05), whereas post-treatment levels of albumin in group A were comparable to those in group B (P > 0.05). Post-treatment levels of tumor serum markers were significantly lower in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). Patients in groups A and B had mild-to-moderate fever and vomiting symptoms, which improved with conservative treatment. The total incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in group B (22.09%) than in group A (6.97%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION DEB-TACE has obvious therapeutic effects on patients with PHC. It can improve liver function indices and tumor markers of patients without increasing the rate of liver toxicity or adverse reactions.

Drug-eluting beads chemoembolization combined with programmed cell death 1 inhibitor and lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinoma.

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor has been widely used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has achieved promising results. However, there are few studies comparing whether drug-eluting beads TACE (D-TACE) can bring more survival benefits to patients with large HCC compared to conventional TACE (C-TACE) in this triplet therapy. To compare the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of triple therapy comprising D-TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib (D-TACE-P-L) and C-TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib (C-TACE-P-L) in patients with large HCC (maximum diameter ≥ 5 cm), and analyze the prognostic factors. Following a comprehensive review of our hospital's medical records, this retrospective study included 104 patients: 50 received D-TACE-P-L, and 54 received C-TACE-P-L. We employed Kaplan-Meier estimation to assess the median progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups, utilized Cox multivariate regression analysis to identify prognostic factors, and applied the χ 2 test to evaluate AEs. The objective response rate (ORR) and median PFS were significantly higher in the D-TACE-P-L group compared to the C-TACE-P-L group (ORR: 66.0% vs 44.4%, P = 0.027; median PFS: 6.8 months vs 5.0 months, P = 0.041). Cox regression analysis identified treatment option, portal vein tumor thrombus, and hepatic vein invasion as protective factors for PFS. AEs were comparable between the two groups. D-TACE-P-L may have significantly better PFS and ORR for large HCC, while exhibiting similar AEs to C-TACE-P-L.

Comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial

This randomized, prospective, multicenter (12 centers in China) phase III trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry #ChiCTR2000041170) compared drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with apatinib and DEB-TACE monotherapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS), mRECIST-based objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were secondary endpoints. Totally 243 cases were randomized, with 122 and 121 in the DEB-TACE + apatinib and DEB-TACE groups, respectively. Cases administered DEB-TACE + apatinib displayed markedly improved median PFS (7.1 months [95%CI 6.6–8.3] vs. 5.2 months [95%CI 5.0–5.9]) and OS (23.3 months [95%CI 20.7–29.6] vs. 18.9 months [95%CI 17.9–20.1] compared with those treated with DEB-TACE (both p < 0.001). Additionally, patients administered DEB-TACE + apatinib had elevated ORR (56.6% vs. 38.8%) and DCR (89.3% vs. 80.2%) versus the DEB-TACE group (both p < 0.001). Majority of TRAEs were mild and manageable. Regarding DEB-TACE-related TRAEs, the rates of hepatic artery thinning and spasms were elevated during the second DEB-TACE in cases administered DEB-TACE + apatinib vs. DEB-TACE. The commonest apatinib-related TRAEs in the DEB-TACE + apatinib group included hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, and diarrhea. In conclusion, DEB-TACE plus apatinib demonstrates superior PFS versus DEB-TACE monotherapy in uHCC cases, maintaining a favorable safety profile with similar occurrences of AEs.

Clinical outcomes of modified transarterial chemoembolization vs. drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as initial treatment for single hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Background & aims Optimizing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can enhance treatment efficacy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study compares modified TACE (M-TACE), which combines a lipiodol-based emulsion and drug-eluting beads, with drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) as initial therapies for solitary HCC. Methods In this retrospective study, 185 patients undergoing M-TACE or DEB-TACE were evaluated. Propensity score matching was used to create 69 balanced pairs. Initial tumor response, repeated treatments within six months, local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Results M-TACE exhibited significantly higher initial complete response (CR) rates (39.1% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.043) and fewer repeated treatments within six months (1.7 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7; p = 0.033) compared to DEB-TACE. LTP rates were notably lower with M-TACE at 12 months (39.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.002), and median time to LTP was prolonged with M-TACE (13.3 vs. 8.2 months, p = 0.038). Stratified analysis revealed a significantly longer OS in individuals achieving a CR after the initial M-TACE (50.5 vs. 33.4 months, p = 0.043). However, the overall study population did not exhibit a significant difference in OS between the two groups. Comparable AEs (all p > 0.05) were observed. Conclusions M-TACE showed higher initial CR rates, lower LTP rates, and extended time to LTP compared to DEB-TACE, indicating its potential to enhance TACE effectiveness for solitary HCC.

Conventional and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for patients with inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

Conventional and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for patients with inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

5-Fluorouracil combined with CalliSphere drug-eluting beads or conventional transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score weighting analysis

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) combined with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) compared to 5-Fu combined with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) using CalliSpheres for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using propensity score weighting methods. This retrospective analysis included 131 patients with HCC treated with 5-Fu combined with cTACE (5-Fu-cTACE group, n = 65) or DEB-TACE (5-Fu-DEB-TACE group, n = 66) at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2019 to December 2022. Based on the baseline data and laboratory indicators, propensity score weighting was used to reduce confounding bias. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) were used to evaluate clinical efficacy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). PFS was assessed using Kaplan‒Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. The ORRs at 1 month (M1) after treatment in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group and 5-Fu-cTACE group were 90.9% and 76.9%, respectively (P = 0.029), while at this time, the DCRs were 93.9% in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group and 90.8% in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (P = 0.494). At 3 months (M3) after treatment, the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group had a higher ORR (84.8% vs. 56.9%, P < 0.001) and DCR (84.8% vs. 72.3%, P = 0.08). The ORR at 6 months (M6) was also higher in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group than in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (72.7% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.01). The median PFS after treatment with 5-Fu-DEB-TACE was longer than that after treatment with 5-Fu-cTACE (11 months vs. 6 months) (P = 0.004). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that 5-Fu-DEB-TACE (HR = 0.590, P = 0.044), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) intermediate risk (HR = 2.470, P = 0.010), BCLC stage B (HR = 2.303, P = 0.036), BCLC stage C (HR = 3.354, P = 0.002) and ascitic fluid (HR = 2.004, P = 0.046) were independent predictors of PFS. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. The 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group had a greater incidence of abdominal pain (72.7% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.003). However, the incidence of postoperative elevated transaminase levels was higher in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (83.1% vs. 66.6%, P = 0.031). Subgroups analysis showed patients receiving 5-Fu-DEB-TACE have better PFS compared to those receiving 5-Fu-cTACE in the BCLC stage A group (P = 0.0093), BCLC stage B group (P = 0.0096), multifocal group (P = 0.0056), Child-Pugh stage A group (P<0.001), non- extrahepatic metastasis group (P = 0.022), non-vascular invasion group (P = 0.0093), and the group with a largest tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.0048). At M1, M3, and M6, patients with preserved liver function and in some cases of low tumor burden had higher Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) (P < 0.05). Compared with 5-Fu-cTACE, 5-Fu-DEB-TACE has superior therapeutic efficacy, prolongs PFS, and reduces hepatotoxicity. However, it is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative abdominal pain.

An Evaluation of the Most Convenient and Effective Procedure for Reducing the Loading Time of Epirubicin Into the Drug-Eluting Bead M1 (DC Bead M1™).

Background and objective Drug-eluting beads (DEB) have been highly useful in the current treatment strategies for multiple and large hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) with or without systemic therapy.Recently, smaller beads have become available in Japan. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the most convenient and effective way to reduce the loading time of epirubicin into the drug-eluting beads M1 (DC Bead M1TM; 70-150 µm). Methods To reduce the loading time of epirubicin intoDC Bead M1, we used a method that involved mixing the drug and then agitating the solution using vortexing: Group A: agitated for 15 sec; Group B: agitated for 20 sec; Group C: agitated for 30 sec; and Group D: left at room temperature as the control group. After the loading of epirubicin by each method, the supernatant concentration of epirubicin was assayed at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, and 120 min. Results Epirubicin loading rates for DC Bead M1 at five minwere 99.7% in Group A, 98.7% in Group B, 99.6% in Group C, and 99.5% in Group D. The four groups reached an equilibrium between five and 120 min. Surprisingly, Group D (left at room temperature for five min) showed the same level of epirubicin loading rate compared to that of Groups A, B, and Cat five min (p=0.566). Morphological analysis showed that there were no significant morphological changes for each agitated time up to 30 seccompared with that observed for the beads left at room temperature. Conclusions The most convenient and effective way for reducing the loading time of epirubicin into DC Bead M1 was observed in Group D (left at room temperature for five min).

Safety and efficacy of DEB-TACE in combination with lenvatinib and camrelizumab for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): a two-centre retrospective study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab (DEB-TACE-Len-C) and DEB-TACE-Len for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This retrospective study consecutively included uHCC patients who underwent DEB-TACE-Len-C or DEB-TACE-Len treatment at our hospital and Qujing Second People's Hospital from April 2020 to April 2022. In total, 85 patients were enrolled. There were 42 patients in the DEB-TACE-Len-C group and 43 patients in the DEB-TACE-Len group. The disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups, and the factors influencing OS and PFS were analysed. The ORR, DCR, PFS and OS were significantly greater in the DEB-TACE-Len-C group than in the DEB-TACE-Len group (ORR: 76.2% vs. 46.5%, P = 0.005; DCR: 88.1% vs. 67.8%, P = 0.039; PFS: 10 months vs. 6 months, P <0.0001; OS: 24 months vs. 16 months, P = 0.0038). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that portal tumour thrombus (PVTT) and therapeutic approach were independent factors affecting PFS and OS. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of AEs between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with DEB-TACE-Len, DEB-TACE-Len-C is an effective treatment option that can improve the tumour therapeutic response and prolong the OS and PFS in uHCC patients.

Clinical evaluation of oxaliplatin-loaded drug-eluting callispheres beads transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma

BackgroundA majority of esophageal carcinoma patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and are no longer suitable for surgical resection. Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with oxaliplatin-loaded CalliSpheres beads (CB) have been used for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer, but they have not been reported for the treatment of unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma.MethodsDEB-TACE was performed on 22 patients with unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma between March 2019 and May 2022. The clinical outcomes, complications, and efficacy were retrospectively recorded and analyzed.ResultsA total of 39 sessions of DEB-TACE were performed in 22 patients, with a technical success rate of 92.3% and clinical success rate of 65.0%. No severe complications such as procedure-related death, esophageal rupture or paraplegia were observed. Complete response, partial response, and stable disease were observed in 14.3% (2/14), 42.9% (6/14), and 21.4% (3/14) of patients 6 months after DEB-TACE, respectively. The objective response rates were 62.5%, 42.9% and 57.1% respectively at 1-, 3-, and 6-month after DEB-TACE. Subsequent interventional treatments were administered to 12 patients, including DEB-TACE for hepatic metastasis in 3 (13.6%), esophageal stenting in 5 (22.7%), and airway stent placement in 5 (22.7%). Two patients were lost to follow up. A total of 9 patients died due to tumor progression (n = 5), pneumatic infection (n = 1), and tumor-related massive esophageal hemorrhage (n = 3). The median overall survivals were 13.9 months and 26.5 months from the first session of DEB-TACE and the diagnosis of esophageal carcinoma, respectively.ConclusionsDEB-TACE with oxaliplatin-loaded CB is suggested as a safe and effective treatment of unresectable or recurrent esophageal carcinoma, and more studies are required to confirm its efficacy and safety.

Is DEB-TACE as locoregional therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma effective?

BackgroundThe objectives were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as locoregional therapy (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) beyond Hangzhou criteria (HC) and to analyze the prognostic factors.MethodsForty patients with HCC beyond HC who received DEB-TACE only before LT were retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and December 2022. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment response, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with RFS and OS.ResultsAll patients successfully underwent LT following DEB-TACE with a mean interval of 2.3 months. The objective response rates (ORRs) for these patients following DEB-TACE was 82.5%. The primary AE was post-embolization syndrome (PES), with affected patients experiencing grades I and II. The median RFS and OS were 12.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-30.1) and 52.0 months (95%CI: 11.8–92.2) over the follow-up period until December 2022. The 2-year RFS and OS rates were 42.5%, and 67.5%. Multivariate analyses revealed Child-Pugh classification (HR = 6.24; 95%CI,1.83–21.24; P = 0.01) and macrovascular invasion (MAV) (HR = 3.89; 95%CI,1.07–14.15; P = 0.04) were both significant independent predictors of OS.ConclusionsDEB-TACE can serve as a safe and effective LRT in HCC patients beyond HC before LT, and can improve the prognosis of patients, especially without MAV. The higher Child–Pugh classification and MAV are independent prognostic factors after LT.

FOLFOX-Based Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Sequential Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

For patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the effectiveness of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains suboptimal, which necessitates the administration of substantial volumes of chemotherapy drugs and lipiodol, thereby increasing the risk of liver failure and other chemotherapy-related complications. Therefore, we devised a strategy of initial hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) followed by sequential drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE). In our treatment design, a lower tumor burden after HAIC facilitated complete embolization of tumor vasculature, and the use of less amount of embolic agents reduced the incidence of liver failure and embolization syndromes. This retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with unresectable large HCC with a maximum tumor diameter of ≥7 cm who received FOLFOX-HAIC combined with sequential DEB-TACE from April 2019 to February 2024. Efficacy was evaluated using the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS); and safety was assessed using the frequency of key adverse events (AEs). Among the 76 patients included, the median maximum tumor diameter was 12.4 cm (range, 7.0-23.4 cm). The overall ORRs based on mRECIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 94.1% and 51.5%, respectively. The median OS was 28.1 months (95% CI, 22.7-33.4), and the median PFS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.8). All patients experienced AEs, but only 18.4% experienced grade 3 or 4 AEs, there was no treatment-related mortality. In this single-center, retrospective study, our results suggested that FOLFOX-HAIC with sequential DEB-TACE demonstrated promising efficacy and safety for patients with unresectable HCC with a maximum tumor diameter of ≥7 cm.

Survival rate comparisons of angioembolization and neoadjuvant targeted therapy on unresectable renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review.

Renal cell cancer (RCC) is the most typical form of kidney cancer in adults, which accounts for 80% to 85% of all primary renal neoplasms. RCC develops inside the renal cortex. This study aimed to systematically review the survival rate of patients treated with targeted therapy and/or RC. Surgery is the standard therapy for RCC, even though after surgery, 20%-40% of patients with localized RCC would experience distant metastases. Metastases or large RCC are not amenable to surgery. Unresectable RCC can be treated palliatively with angioembolization or neoadjuvant therapy. This study aims to review the survival rate comparisons of angioembolization and neoadjuvant targeted therapy on unresectable renal cell carcinoma. A thorough search across databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest was conducted for articles published from 2018 to 2023. To uphold research integrity, duplicates, reviews, and incomplete articles were excluded, ensuring only pertinent and original research findings for subsequent analysis. Database search yielded 247 articles, which were systematically eliminated, leaving 6 relevant articles. Analyzed articles showed the overall survival of patients treated with angioembolization and neoadjuvant agents. Unresectable RCC can be treated palliatively with angioembolization. Angioembolization may improve clinical effectiveness and lessen side effects by boosting local concentrations of drugs. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization is a novel embolization option that can embolize the arteries that feed the tumor and cutoff the blood supply to the tumor. Sunitinib, the most studied medicinal agent, was found to have higher effectiveness when combined with angioembolization.

A Study on Overcoming Post-TACE Drug Resistance in HCC Based on Controllable Oxygen Release-Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy.

Drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) is one of the first-line treatment for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the dual hypoxia microenvironment, due to inherent tumor hypoxia and TACE-induced hypoxia, triggers drug resistance in HCC. To address this challenge, the study develops multicavitary microspheres capable of encapsulating oxygen and harnessing magnetic hyperthermia to enhance oxygen permeability. The novel multicavitary oxygen-encapsulated magnetothermal drug-eluting microspheres (OTD-Ms) effectively reduce hypoxia-related proteins (HIF-1α, VEGF-A) and drug resistance (P-gp) both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, these microspheres demonstrate improved TACE efficacy and enhance survival rates in a rabbit VX-2 tumor model, suggesting their potential for HCC treatment.

Microbubbles bound to drug-eluting beads enable ultrasound imaging and enhanced delivery of therapeutics

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an image-guided minimally invasive treatment for liver cancer which involves delivery of chemotherapy and embolic material into tumor-supplying arteries to block blood flow to a liver tumor and to deliver chemotherapy directly to the tumor. However, the released drug diffuses only less than a millimeter away from the beads. To enhance the efficacy of TACE, the development of microbubbles electrostatically bound to the surface of drug-eluting beads loaded with different amounts of doxorubicin (0–37.5 mg of Dox/mL of beads) is reported. Up to 400 microbubbles were bound to Dox-loaded beads (70–150 microns). This facilitated ultrasound imaging of the beads and increased the release rate of Dox upon exposure to high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Furthermore, ultrasound exposure (1 MPa peak negative pressure) increased the distance at which Dox could be detected from beads embedded in a tissue-mimicking phantom, compared with a no ultrasound control.

Comparison of drug-eluting bead with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a randomized clinical trial.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has shown efficacy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). However, whether DEB-TACE is superior to conventional TACE (cTACE) remains unclear. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE versus cTACE in treating HCC with PVTT. The study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Southeast China. HCC patients with PVTT were randomized at a 1:1 ratio into the DEB-TACE or cTACE groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). An independent review committee assessed the radiologic response according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). AEs were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Systemic therapies were not restricted. Between September 2018 and July 2020, 163 patients were randomized to undergo DEB-TACE ( n =82) or cTACE ( n =81). Nine patients were excluded, and 154 patients were included in the final analysis; the median age was 55 years (range, 24-78years), and 140 (90.9%) were male. The median PFS in the DEB-TACE group was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-10.0) versus 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.0) in the cTACE group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P =0.027). The DEB-TACE group showed a higher response rate [51 (66.2%) vs. 36 (46.8%); P =0.0015] and a longer median OS [12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-16.0) vs. 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.0-11.0), P =0.039] than the cTACE group. Multivariate analysis showed that the treatment group, ALBI score, distant metastasis and additional TKIs were the four independent prognostic factors correlated with PFS. In addition, the treatment group, PVTT group and combination with surgery were independently associated with OS. AEs were similar in the two groups, and postembolization syndrome was the most frequent AE. DEB-TACE is superior to cTACE in treating HCC patients with PVTT, demonstrating improved PFS and OS with an acceptable safety profile, and may thus emerge as a promising treatment strategy for HCC patients with PVTT. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800018035.

975P Lenvatinib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with or without hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (> 7 cm) with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

975P Lenvatinib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with or without hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (> 7 cm) with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

1336P Clinical outcomes, toxic effect, and changes of immune microenvironment of drug-eluting beads bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) combined with immunotherapy in the treatment of elder patients with non-small cell lung cancer

1336P Clinical outcomes, toxic effect, and changes of immune microenvironment of drug-eluting beads bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) combined with immunotherapy in the treatment of elder patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib/camrelizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic arterioportal shunts.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) combined with apatinib/camrelizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic arterioportal shunts (APSs). From January 2021 to December 2022, the consecutive medical records of patients with advanced HCC and APS receiving D-TACE combined with apatinib/camrelizumab were reviewed for eligibility. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumour response, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. A total of 23 patients were included in this study, with a median follow-up of 11 months (range, 2-26 months). Eight patients (34.8%) achieved partial response; 13 (56.5%), stable disease; and 2 (8.7%), progressive disease. The objective response and disease control rates were 34.8% and 91.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS rates were 11 and 7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that the tumour number was an independent prognostic factor for PFS. AEs occurred in 19 patients after oral apatinib treatment and in 8 patients after camrelizumab treatment. No treatment-related death occurred during the study period. D-TACE combined with apatinib/camrelizumab showed meaningful efficacy and controllable AEs in these patients, making it a promising treatment option. (1) We investigated a new treatment strategy for patients with advanced HCC and hepatic APS and (2) D-TACE combined with apatinib/camrelizumab demonstrated meaningful efficacy and manageable AEs, making it a promising treatment option.