MLR, 105.2, 2010 533 discussion of Clarissas personal style' unpicks themeanings of Clarissas various outfits, identifying the minutiae of individual sartorial choices as symbolic of a natural' dress sense, contrasted to the artificial types constructed by Lovelace's use of dress-as-disguise. This part also incorporates a chapter on masquerade, where the denizens of the Sinclair brothel are read as enacting a 'reversemasquerade' as members of theHarlowe family (p. 128). Many of the ideas here are hardly new, but the satisfyinglywell-observed readings allow foruseful nuances and perspectives. The final section, Part iv, treats of Grandison. Highlights here include a prob ing reading ofHarriet's 'Arcadian' masquerade costume as an echo not of Sidney's Pamela, but ofhis transvestite Pyrocles/Zelmane, connoting gendered disorder. The analysis of Harriet's passive virtue' in agreeing towear this outfit of her friends' procurement provides a balanced consideration of the slippery gender politics of Richardson's last novel, as it seeks, inOliver's reading, to 'stabilise' meaning and gendered distinctions (p. 167). In this respect, the book contributes to recent re conceptions ofGrandison s apparently conservative cultural politics. Although one might demur from assertions about Sir Charles's unproblematic 'selflessness' and 'democratic' bent (pp. 143-44), this reading of the novel provides a good addition to burgeoning discussion of the text. The narrow focus of this study (candidly acknowledged by the author) means that itwill be of interest largely to teachers or scholars of Richardson. For them, however, this informative and thoughtful book is at least worth perusal for its valuably historicized and accessible accounts of a constant thread inhis work. University of Leeds Bonnie Latimer Women sWar Drama inEngland in theSeventeenth Century. By Brenda Josephine Liddy. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press. 2008. xi+317 pp. ?64.95. ISBN 978 1-60497-523-9. 'Women everywhere ought to lay flowers on their tombs'/ (p. 284)?the refer ence being toMargaret Cavendish, Elizabeth Brackley, JaneCavendish, Katherine Philips, and Aphra Behn. This is the concluding sentence of Brenda Josephine Liddy's book, which presents original and instructive insights on how these fe male authors depicted dramatically the profound transformation which the Civil War, Interregnum, and Restoration generated in the lives ofwomen in England. The plays which Liddy has included in her study ofwomen's war drama are: The Concealed Fancies, The Sociable Companions, The Rover, The Feigned Courtesans, The Loves Adventures, Bell inCampo, The Young King, TheWidow Ranter, Pompey and Horace, The Roundheads, and The City Heiress. Although the settings of these dramas cover a large span of time, from the Civil War up to the 1670s, Liddy's approach is thematic rather than chronological. This enables her to foreground from her chosen corpus threemajor themes: the female communities inwar, the representation of women warriors, and women as peacemakers. The conception that Liddy puts forward regarding the ways in which civil conflicts reproduce themselves in the representation of gender relations and rein 534 Reviews vention of self supports her analysis of the plays throughout the book. This idea is furtherdeveloped by applying a feminist historicist approach to the texts.Dramat ization of the community ofwomen inwar and post-war settings presents women as creative agents who could utilize the sorrow and grief caused bywar as ameans to reinvent themselves. Instead of trapping their self inside, female characters in the plays began to challenge the traditional norms of society to the extent that they could become communal agencies in strategic problem-solving, the role they played in rebuilding their society. Liddy argues thatdrama was ameans to promote the royal cause, thewriters in sisting that the Interregnum represented an inversion of reality.Performance of the play could engender loyalty to theKing and bolster thedemand for self-fashioning and power implicit in thework ofwriters contributing to that cause. Notions such as that of a female general presented through the character of Lady Victoria in Bell inCampo even suggested the possibility of female military leadership, which, the Lady claimed, could 'bring emotional intelligence to the battlefield and assist them [soldiers] in the combat' (p. 145). This is far from the depiction of female characters such as Desdemona in Shakespeare's plays, which had remained the stereotype ofwomen. The writer...
Read full abstract