Doublet Chemotherapy In Patients Research Articles

Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab versus platinum doublet chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

There is no consensus on whether platinum doublet chemotherapy or lenvatinib and pembrolizumab (LEN/PEM) is superior for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Thus, this study aimed to compare the prognosis and adverse events in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer treated with platinum doublet chemotherapy or LEN/PEM. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who received platinum doublet chemotherapy or LEN/PEM at our institution for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and had a history of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2013 and August 2023. During the study period, 11 regimens were identified in the platinum doublet chemotherapy group, and 11 regimens were identified in the LEN/PEM group. The objective response rates of the platinum doublet chemotherapy and LEN/PEM groups were 36.4% and 54.5% (P=0.67), respectively. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates of the platinum doublet chemotherapy and LEN/PEM groups were 27.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.8-40.7%) and 70.0% (95% CI, 55.5-84.5%), respectively. The differences were significant between the two groups. Multivariate analyses of histology, prior lines of chemotherapy, platinum-free intervals, and regimens revealed that the LEN/PEM group had significantly better PFS rates. Treatment with LEN/PEM resulted in significantly longer PFS than that of treatment with platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. However, further large-scale studies are required to validate these findings.

Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: study protocol for cohort C of the open-label, phase 2, randomized controlled multicenter OPAL trial

BackgroundMaintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib’s efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination–deficient tumors.MethodsOPAL is an ongoing global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. In OPAL-C, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive three 21-day cycles of either neoadjuvant niraparib or platinum-taxane doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy per standard of care. Patients with a complete or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) will then undergo interval debulking surgery; patients with stable disease may proceed to interval debulking surgery or alternative therapy at the investigator’s discretion. Patients with disease progression will exit the study treatment and proceed to alternative therapy at the investigator’s discretion. After interval debulking surgery, all patients will receive up to three 21-day cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy for up to 36 months. Adult patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer eligible to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery may be enrolled. Patients must have tumors that are homologous recombination–deficient. The primary endpoint is the pre–interval debulking surgery unconfirmed overall response rate, defined as the investigator-assessed percentage of patients with unconfirmed complete or partial response on study treatment before interval debulking surgery per RECIST v1.1.DiscussionOPAL-C explores the use of niraparib in the neoadjuvant setting as an alternative to neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy to improve postsurgical residual disease outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer with homologous recombination–deficient tumors. Positive findings from this approach could significantly impact preoperative ovarian cancer therapy, particularly for patients who are ineligible for primary debulking surgery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574779. Registered on February 28, 2022.

The role of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy after failure of nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Adding nivolumab to fluoropyrimidines and platinum agents has been considered a new standard first-line treatment in previously untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, there were few data on the role of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line treatment after failure of nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy. Herein, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of second-line ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in AGC patients refractory to nivolumab plus chemotherapy. This analysis included AGC patients with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy after failing to respond to nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy [capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) or 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)] at Samsung Medical Center, Korea. Twenty patients who progressed on nivolumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy were treated with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel between December 2021 and September 2022. The median age was 56 (range, 24-76) years, and 13 (65.0%) were men. Of the 20 patients, 15 (75.0%) patients received nivolumab plus capecitabine, and oxaliplatin, while 5 (25.0%) patients received nivolumab plus 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. Two showed a partial response (PR) to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel, a response rate of 10%. Patients with stable disease (SD) accounted for a disease control rate (DCR) of 55.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel was 2.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-3.7]. Subgroup analysis showed that responders (n=7) to first-line therapy had a PFS of 6.9 months compared to 2.3 months in non-responders (n=13) to first-line therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.5-8.3), representing 6.9 months (95% CI: not calculated) in responders and 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.7-8.9) in non-responders (P=0.401). This analysis suggested that ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy might be further studied in AGC patients after failure of nivolumab plus chemotherapy. A new second-line therapy is needed in AGC patients after nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Patients With Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations.

The LUX-Lung 3 study investigated the efficacy of chemotherapy compared with afatinib, a selective, orally bioavailable ErbB family blocker that irreversibly blocks signaling from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ErbB2), and ErbB4 and has wide-spectrum preclinical activity against EGFR mutations. A phase II study of afatinib in EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma demonstrated high response rates and progression-free survival (PFS). In this phase III study, eligible patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma were screened for EGFR mutations. Mutation-positive patients were stratified by mutation type (exon 19 deletion, L858R, or other) and race (Asian or non-Asian) before two-to-one random assignment to 40 mg afatinib per day or up to six cycles of cisplatin plus pemetrexed chemotherapy at standard doses every 21 days. The primary end point was PFS by independent review. Secondary end points included tumor response, overall survival, adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). A total of 1,269 patients were screened, and 345 were randomly assigned to treatment. Median PFS was 11.1 months for afatinib and 6.9 months for chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.78; P = .001). Median PFS among those with exon 19 deletions and L858R EGFR mutations (n = 308) was 13.6 months for afatinib and 6.9 months for chemotherapy (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65; P = .001). The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, rash/acne, and stomatitis for afatinib and nausea, fatigue, and decreased appetite for chemotherapy. PROs favored afatinib, with better control of cough, dyspnea, and pain. Afatinib is associated with prolongation of PFS when compared with standard doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutations.

EP14.01-006 CeLEBrATE: Phase II trial of CarbopLatin, Etoposide, Bevacizumab and Atezolizumab in Patients with exTEnsive-Stage SCLC-GOIRC-01-2019

The addition of programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition with atezolizumab or durvalumab to platinum-doublet chemotherapy is the new standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) as it improved survival in phase III trials, raising overall survival rate at 1 year (1-year OS) from 35% to about 50%. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) sustains angiogenesis and has immunosuppressive effects. The phase II SALUTE and the phase III FARM6PMFJM trial, the latter lead by our GOIRC group, have shown safety and provided signals of activity of bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic agent, added to platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC.

1026P Treatment switching adjustment of overall survival in the CheckMate 227 clinical trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

CheckMate 227 is a phase III clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated for advanced disease. Some patients in the chemotherapy arm subsequently switched to an immunotherapy due to toxicity or progressive disease. We update overall survival estimates by adjusting for potential biases introduced by treatment switching from chemotherapy to subsequent immunotherapy. The Inverse Probability of Censoring Weights (IPCW) method that adjusts the treatment effect estimates in the presence of informative censoring was applied to adjust OS for treatment switching in the ITT population as a post hoc analysis based on 3-year follow up data. The IPCW method, being well recognized by health authorities, was considered as the base case. Other treatment switching adjustment methods were explored as sensitivity analysis. Exploratory analyses were also conducted in select subgroups. In part 1 of the trial, a total of 1166 patients (583 each arm) were included in the analysis. 235 (40.3%) patients in the chemotherapy arm switched to an immunotherapy. Median OS was 17.1 months (95% CI: 15.5 to 20.0) for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm and 14.0 months (95% CI: 12.6-15.4 months) for the chemotherapy arm. After adjustment for treatment switching, the median OS for the chemotherapy arm was 10.8 months (95% CI: 9.2 -12.8). The hazard ratio (HR) of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.85), which after adjustment reduced to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53 to 0.73). Based on 3-year follow up data from CheckMate 227, adjusting for treatment switching biases in the chemotherapy arm resulted in a numerically greater estimated relative OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy in previously untreated patients, with advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK aberrations than in the unadjusted analysis.

OA15.03 Avelumab vs Chemotherapy for First-line Treatment of Advanced PD-L1+ NSCLC: Primary Analysis from JAVELIN Lung 100

Avelumab is an anti-PD-L1 antibody that has shown antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report results from the phase 3 JAVELIN Lung 100 trial, which compared first-line (1L) avelumab monotherapy (2 dose schedules) vs platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC.

Veliparib and nivolumab in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase 1 dose escalation study

ObjectivesBoth combinations of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus platinum doublet chemotherapy (CT), and the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor nivolumab plus CT have demonstrated encouraging efficacy for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 1 dose-escalation study (NCT02944396) evaluated the quadruple combination of veliparib with nivolumab and doublet CT in patients with unresectable advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Materials and methodsPatients were enrolled into five dosing cohorts: patients received veliparib 120 mg twice daily (BID) combined with nivolumab 360 mg, carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL∙min, and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (C/PAC) or veliparib 80/120/200/240 mg BID in combination with nivolumab 360 mg, carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL∙min, and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (C/PEM). Primary objective was to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of veliparib + nivolumab + CT. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of this combination were also assessed. ResultsTwenty-five patients were enrolled: 6 patients received veliparib 120 mg BID + nivolumab + C/PAC and 19 received veliparib (80–240 mg BID) + nivolumab + C/PEM. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported, and the RP2Ds were veliparib 120 mg BID + nivolumab + C/PAC, and veliparib 240 mg BID + nivolumab + C/PEM. The most common any-grade adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (56%), nausea (52%), and anemia (48%). Grade 3/4 AEs included anemia (32%) and neutropenia (24%), and the most frequent serious AE was malignant neoplasm progression (12%). Veliparib exhibited approximately dose proportional kinetics in the dose range 80–240 mg BID combined with nivolumab and C/PEM, with no effects on pemetrexed pharmacokinetics. Overall, the confirmed objective response rate was 40%, and best overall response was 64%. ConclusionVeliparib combined with nivolumab and platinum doublet CT was tolerated in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, and no evidence of drug–drug interaction was observed. Although preliminary, this quadruple therapy may have promising antitumor activity.

CTONG1103: Final overall survival analysis of the randomized phase 2 trial of erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer.

8502 Background: Median Overall survival (mOS) of stage IIIA resected NSCLC was 59.4 months (m) in CTONG 1104 adj gefitinib and 26.2m in SAKK neoadjuvant chemo trial. EMERGING-CTONG1103 showed neo-adjuvant/adjuvant erlotinib treatment significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs standard doublet chemotherapy in patients (pts) with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation-positive resectable stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) results from the study. Methods: This was a multicenter (17 centers in China) phase II randomized controlled trial of erlotinib（E）versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in pts with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with EGFR mutations in exon 19 or 21. From Dec 2011 to Dec. 2017, 386 pts sites were screened and 72 pts were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant/adjuvant E arm (N = 37) or GC arm(N = 35). Patients received erlotinib 150 mg/d (neoadjuvant therapy, 42 days; adjuvant therapy, up to 12 months) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (neoadjuvant therapy, two cycles; adjuvant therapy, up to two cycles). Assessments were performed at 6 weeks and every 3 months postoperative. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; secondary end points were pathologic complete response, downstaging rates of pathological lymph nodes, PFS, OS, safety, and tolerability. Data cut-off date was January, 29 2021. Results: With a median follow-up of 62.5 months, the median OS was 42.2months based on 47 (65.3%) events in ITT whole population. The mOS was 42.2m in E and 36.9m in GC (HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.47-1.47, p = 0.513). The 3-,5-year OS rate were 58.6%, 40.8% in E and 55.9%, 27.6% in GC respectively (p3-y = 0.819, p5-y = 0.252). All predefined subgroups including age, gender, EGFR mutation type had no significant difference in statistics between two arms. Subsequent treatments (ST) especially targeted therapy contributed most to OS (HR = 0.35,95% CI 0.18- 0.70). Median OS of pts receiving ST was 45.8m (n = 38), 34.6m in other treatment (n = 12), 24.6m in without ST (n = 15). For E mOS were 46.4 (n = 15; target therapy), 42.2m (n = 8; other) and 24.6m (n = 9; without, p = 0.021), for GC 42.6 (n = 23; target therapy), 30.1m (n = 4;other) and 24.6m(n = 6; without, p = 0.130). The RR was 53.3%, DCR 93.3%, mPFS 10.9m and mPPS 21.9m for patients with rechallenged EGFR TKI in E arm (n = 15). No novel unexpected SAE was observed during follow up. Conclusion: Erlotinib as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy for resected N2 NSCLC was feasibility and had a promising OS. The PFS survival advantage of E did not translate to OS difference in EMERGING trial (NCT01407822). Clinical trial information: NCT01407822.

Impact of tumor location on effectiveness of first-line 5-FU-based palliative doublet chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer.

240 Background: While gastroesophageal cancers with different primary tumor locations can have distinct molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes, the efficacy of palliative chemotherapy in tumors with different locations is unknown. Using primary tumor location as a surrogate for molecular subtype, we investigated the differential efficacy of first-line doublet chemotherapy in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who received first-line palliative chemotherapy at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and the Dallas County Safety Net Parkland Hospital diagnosed between 2011-2019. Cases were identified using cancer registries. We categorized the tumor location as proximal or distal based on endoscopy and imaging studies. Disease response was assessed on the first staging scan and classified as ‘disease shrinkage, stability, or progression.’ Overall and progression-free survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. Results: 99 patients were identified; 58.6% had proximal tumors. Patients with proximal tumors were more likely to be white (38% vs. 13%, p = 0.008) and older with age ≥ 50 years (71% vs. 51%, p = 0.04) and less likely to have peritoneal metastasis (48% vs. 78%, p = 0.003) than distal tumors. Patients with proximal tumors had a higher disease shrinkage than patients with distal tumors (53% vs. 21%, p = 0.004). Patients with proximal tumors also had better overall survival (median 12.5 vs. 8.7 months) and progression-free survival in response to 5-FU based chemotherapy (median 5 vs. 4 months) compared to patients with distal tumors, but this was not statistically significant. On multivariable analysis, tumor location was not independently predictive of progression-free survival after adjusting for age, gender, presence of signet rings, diffuse, intestinal histology, and peritoneal metastasis (HR 1.22 95% CI 0.74-2.00), but pretreatment albumin was (HR 0.63 95% CI 0.43-0.94). Conclusions: Proximal gastroesophageal cancers have a better clinical response to first-line 5FU containing chemotherapy than distal cancers. Currently, there is no platform to determine molecular subgroups that is commercially available. Until testing for this becomes available, differences in response rates to palliative chemotherapy in gastroesophageal cancers with different anatomical locations should be recognized and studied further.

Differential Efficacy of Pembrolizumab According to Metastatic Sites in Patients With PD-L1 Strongly Positive (TPS ≥ 50%) NSCLC

BackgroundPembrolizumab has shown significantly better efficacy than platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) strongly positive (tumor proportion score ≥ 50%) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the predictors of response to pembrolizumab have not yet been fully elucidated for patients with PD-L1 strongly positive NSCLC. Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 145 patients who had been treated with pembrolizumab for PD-L1 strongly positive (TPS ≥ 50%) NSCLC without an EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutation or ALK rearrangement from February 2017 to March 2020. Various clinical characteristics, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, treatment line, PD-L1 expression, C-reactive protein level, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and metastatic sites, and the clinical outcome of pembrolizumab treatment were examined. ResultsPatients with higher PD-L1 expression (≥ 75%; n = 90) had a higher objective response rate (ORR) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those with lower expression (50%-74%; n = 55; ORR, 51% vs. 33%; P = .0305; median PFS, 13.9 months vs. 5.2 months; P = .0111). In addition, 15 patients with liver metastasis (LM) had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS than the 130 patients without LM (ORR, 20% vs. 47%; P = .0468; median PFS, 3.4 months vs. 9.4 months; P = .0018). A multivariate analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression and LM were significant predictors of PFS after pembrolizumab treatment (higher PD-L1 expression: hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.91; P = .0183; presence of LM: hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.82; P = .0420). ConclusionPD-L1 expression and LM status were predictors of the efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 strongly positive NSCLC.

CTONG1104: Adjuvant gefitinib versus chemotherapy for resected N1-N2 NSCLC with EGFR mutation—Final overall survival analysis of the randomized phase III trial 1 analysis of the randomized phase III trial.

9005 Background: ADJUVANT-CTONG1104, a randomized phase 3 trial showed adjuvant gefitinib treatment significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) vs standard doublet chemotherapy in patients (pts) with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation-positive resected stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 5-year survival rate of N1N2 were 38%-50% in IASLC staging system. Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) results from the study. Methods: From Sep 2011 to April 2014, 222 patients, aged 18-75 years, with EGFR activating mutation through completely resection and diagnosed as stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) NSCLC pathologically from 27 sites were enrolled. The enrolled patients were 1:1 randomized to receive adjuvant gefitinib (250 mg once per day) for 24 months (G, n=111) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m2, d1 and d8) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2, d1) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (C, n=111). The primary endpoint was DFS in the ITT population. Secondary endpoints included OS, 3 and 5-year DFS rate, 5-year OS rate. The subsequent therapy data were collected, including crossover from C to G, re-challenge TKI and other treatment. Data cut-off date was Jan. 13, 2020. Results: A median follow-up was 76.9 months. The median OS (mOS) was 75.5 months based on 95 (42.8%) events in ITT whole population. The mOS was 75.5m in G arm and 79.2m in C arm (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.64-1.43, p=0.823). The 3, 5-year OS rate were 68.6%, 53.8% in G and 67.5%, 52.4% in C respectively. DFS in 3, 5-y were 40.3%, 23.4% in G and 33.2%, 23.7% in C, respectively (P3-y=0.395, P5-y=891). All predefined subgroups including age, gender, lymph node, EGFR mutation type had no significant difference in statistics but in favor of G arm in trend. Subsequent treatment especially targeted therapy contributed most to OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 – 0.83). Median OS of patients receiving subsequent target therapy was75.5m (n=35), 36.4m in other treatment (n=33; (P<0.001). For G mOS were 75.5 (n=15; target therapy) and 35.0 (n=18; other, p<0.001), for C 62.8m (n=20) and 46.8m (n=15; p=0.251). The RR was 26.7%, DCR 66.7%, mPFS 14.1m and mOS 19.6m for patients with rechallenged EGFR TKI in G arm (n=15). No novel unexpected SAE was observed during follow up. Conclusion The DFS survival advantage did not translate to OS difference in ADJUVANT trial. The OS with 75.5m was the best one of survival in completely resected N1N2 NSCLC comparing with historical data and sequent TKI treatment contribute to overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01405079.

A comparison between triplet and doublet chemotherapy in improving the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundChemotherapy can improve the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, whether triplet chemotherapy can further improve the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with doublet chemotherapy remains controversial. This study reviewed and updated all published and eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy, prognosis, and toxicity of triplet chemotherapy with doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.MethodsRCTs on first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and all abstracts from the annual meetings of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences up to October 2018 were searched. The primary outcome was overall survival, while the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), time to progress (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity.ResultsOur analysis included 23 RCTs involving 4540 patients and 8 types of triplet and doublet chemotherapy regimens, and systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that triplet chemotherapy was superior compared with doublet chemotherapy in terms of improving median OS (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86–0.98; P = 0.02) and PFS (HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69–0.97; P = 0.02) and TTP (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86–0.98; P = 0.02) and ORR (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12–1.31; P < 0.0001) among overall populations. Compared with doublet chemotherapy, subgroup analysis indicated that OS improved with fluoropyrimidine-based (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66–0.96; P = 0.02), platinum-based (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57–0.99; P = 0.04), and other drug-based triplet (HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69–0.90; P = 0.0006) chemotherapies while not with anthracycline-based (HR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42–1.15; P = 0.16), mitomycin-based (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.47–1.39; P = 0.44), taxane-based (HR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81–1.01; P = 0.07), and irinotecan-based triplet (HR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.82–1.24; P = 0.94) chemotherapies. For different patients, compared with doublet chemotherapy, triplet chemotherapy improved OS (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81–0.99; P = 0.03) among Western patients but did not improve (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86–1.07; P = 0.47) that among Asian patients.ConclusionsCompared with doublet chemotherapy, triplet chemotherapy improved OS, PFS, TTP, and ORR in patients with advanced gastric cancer in the population overall, and improved OS in Western but not in Asian patients.

The efficacy and safety of extended use of endostatin plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: An analysis of a 10-year retrospective study.

e20523 Background: Endostatin is a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis developed and approved in China. We aimed to evaluated the efficacy and safety of extended use of endostatin with platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in this study. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of chemotherapy-naïve patient with stage IIIB-IV or recurrent NSCLC who had been treated with first-line chemotherapy plus endostatin between January 2008 and June 2018. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic importance of risk factors (age, gender, smoking status, ECOG performance status, stage, histology, EGFR gene status and endostatin cycles). Results: A total of 105 patients were eligible for analysis. The median (range) cycles of chemotherapy with endostatin were 4 (2-19). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 45.1% and 87.3%, respectively. Under multivariate analysis, non-smoking status and extended use of endostatin (≥4 cycles) were significantly correlated with better PFS, and squamous cell cancer and extended use of endostatin (≥4 cycles) were significantly correlated with better OS. The median (95% CI) PFS and OS for patients with extended use of endostatin (≥4 cycles) or not were 8.2 (5.6-12.7) vs. 5.3 (2.8-7.3) months, HR = 0.63, p= 0.014, and 21.2 (6.8-37.7) vs. 11.9 (4.1-23.9) months, HR = 0.77, p= 0.028, respectively. Patients with squamous cell cancers significantly benefited from the extended use of endostatin (≥4 cycles) (n = 55, p= 0.043) but not adenocarcinoma (n = 46, p= 0.089). Hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities occurred more frequently in patients who received extended use of endostatin (≥4 cycles), but no statistically significant difference was detected in those who did not. Conclusions: In patients with advanced/recurrent NSCLC, extended use of endostatin (≥4 cycles) could provide additional survival benefits and satisfactory toxicity profiles, especially for those with squamous cell cancer, which merits further evaluation in a larger prospective study.

Long-term survival follow-up of atezolizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundBefore the availability of immunotherapy, chemotherapy was standard first-line therapy for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking actionable gene alterations. Preclinical evidence suggests chemotherapy is immunomodulatory, supporting chemotherapy/immunotherapy combinations. Atezolizumab, anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, blocks programmed cell death protein-1 and B7.1 interaction with PD-L1. GP28328 (NCT01633970) assessed atezolizumab with chemotherapy in multiple tumours; we report results for advanced, treatment-naïve NSCLC. MethodsPatients received atezolizumab plus carboplatin with paclitaxel (Arm C: atezo/cb/pac), pemetrexed (Arm D: atezo/cb/pem, maintenance pemetrexed permitted), or nab-paclitaxel (Arm E: atezo/cb/nab-pac), four–six cycles, then atezolizumab maintenance. Primary end-point was safety; secondary end-points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ResultsSeventy-six NSCLC patients were enrolled (n = 25, 25 and 26 for Arms C, D and E, respectively). Common treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events were neutropenia (36% atezo/cb/pac, 36% atezo/cb/pem, 42% atezo/cb/nab-pac) and anaemia (16% atezo/cb/pac, 16% atezo/cb/pem, 31% atezo/cb/nab-pac). Confirmed ORRs were 36% atezo/cb/pac, 68% atezo/cb/pem (one complete response [CR]) and 46% atezo/cb/nab-pac (four CRs). Median PFS was 7.1 months, (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.2–8.3), 8.4 months (95% CI: 4.7–11) and 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.4–14.8), respectively. Median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI: 8.8–21.3), 18.9 months (95% CI: 9.9–27.4) and 17.0 months (95% CI: 12.7–not evaluable), respectively. ConclusionAtezolizumab with chemotherapy was well tolerated with encouraging efficacy, though the analysis was limited by small numbers. NSCLC chemotherapy combination studies are ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT01633970.

Abstract CT082: Impact of tumor mutation burden on the efficacy of first-line nivolumab in stage iv or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: An exploratory analysis of CheckMate 026

Abstract Background: CheckMate 026 is a randomized trial of nivolumab monotherapy versus platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with untreated stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ≥1% programmed death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor expression. Nivolumab was not associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy in patients with ≥5% PD-L1 expression, however, nivolumab had a favorable safety profile compared with chemotherapy and overall survival (OS) was similar between treatment arms. In an exploratory analysis, we assessed whether patients with high tumor mutation burden (TMB) may derive enhanced benefit from nivolumab compared with platinum doublet chemotherapy. Methods: TMB scores for missense, somatic mutations were determined in patients with sufficient samples for whole exome sequencing of tumor and matched whole blood DNA. For the initial analyses, patients were equally divided into groups based on TMB tertile distribution. Patients in the low, medium, and high TMB tertiles had 0-99, 100-242, and ≥243 mutations, respectively. Results: Of 541 randomized patients, 312 (57.7%) had evaluable data to determine TMB. The percentage of patients with high TMB was lower in the nivolumab arm than in the chemotherapy arm (29.7% vs 39.0%). Baseline characteristics, PFS, and OS in patients evaluable for TMB were similar to all randomized patients. In patients with high TMB, PFS was improved (median PFS of 9.7 vs. 5.8 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.00) and objective response rate was higher with nivolumab versus chemotherapy (46.8% vs 28.3%). OS in patients with high TMB was similar between the 2 treatment arms, which may be attributable in part to a 65% crossover rate to nivolumab in the chemotherapy arm for this subgroup. Conclusions: This is the first pivotal randomized phase 3 trial to incorporate an analysis evaluating TMB and clinical benefit with programmed death-1 inhibitor therapy. The findings of this exploratory retrospective analysis suggest that nivolumab improves ORR and PFS compared with platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with high TMB. Citation Format: Solange Peters, Benjamin Creelan, Matthew D. Hellmann, Mark A. Socinski, Martin Reck, Prabhu Bhagavatheeswaran, Han Chang, William J. Geese, Luis Paz-Ares, David P. Carbone. Impact of tumor mutation burden on the efficacy of first-line nivolumab in stage iv or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: An exploratory analysis of CheckMate 026 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT082. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT082

1246P - Adjusted indirect comparison using propensity score matching of osimertinib to doublet chemotherapy in patients with EGFRm T790M NSCLC who have progressed after EGFR-TKI

In the absence of randomized data comparing osimertinib to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (PBDC) in patients (pts) with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRm) T790M non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed after EGFR-TKI, an adjusted indirect comparison can offer a robust estimate of treatment effect. The IMPRESS study placebo arm (PBDC) (data cut-off [DCO] 2014 May) included a subgroup of pts with the T790M mutation and disease progression following response to EGFR-TKI. Pts had similar demographic and disease characteristics as those in AURA extension (NCT01802632) and AURA2 (NCT02094261) trials of osimertinib (DCO May 2015), and therefore represent a valid comparator to demonstrate differences in outcomes. The efficacy of osimertinib relative to PBDC was assessed using an adjusted indirect comparison of two non-randomized data sets comprising pts with a confirmed T790M mutation (by tissue or plasma ctDNA respectively): AURA (N = 405) and IMPRESS placebo arm (N = 60). A propensity score (PS) approach was used to adjust for differences in baseline demographics and disease characteristics. Baseline characteristics of both groups were compared using statistical tests. The PS model included 22 variables with P < 0.2. Only pts within the PS distributions of both treatment groups were included in the final analyses. To adjust for remaining differences between the groups, PS was incorporated as a covariate in the treatment comparison of osimertinib relative to PBDC for each endpoint. Following estimation of PS for each pt and balancing across the groups (osimertinib N = 287, PBDC N = 51) osimertinib demonstrated: A statistically significant improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.19–0.42, P < 0.0001) An improvement in objective response rate (ORR) of 64.6% vs 34.8% (OR 4.76, 95% CI 2.21–10.26, P < 0.001). In this indirect comparison, a statistically significant improvement in PFS and ORR was demonstrated for osimertinib compared to PBDC. AURA3 will provide a randomized comparison of osimertinib and PBDC.

Abstract A1-55: Combination of a three-microRNA signature and TP53 genotype predicts responses to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract Platinum-based doublet, i.e., a combination of a platinum agent and another agent, is a standard regimen to treat non-small cell lung cancer, since molecular target therapy using tyrosine kinase inhibitors is effective only in a subset of patients with tumors with druggable oncogene mutations. Therefore, to identify biomarkers that can discriminate responders who received platinum-based chemotherapy before treatment is important to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. We found that a SNP in TP53 tumor suppressor gene, TP53-Arg72Pro is associated with response to the platinum-based doublet therapy (Shiraishi et al, JCO, 2010). We recently assessed intra-tumor micro (mi)RNA expression as a biomarker for predicting responses to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent lung adenocarcinoma. Microarray-based screening of 904 miRNAs followed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR-based verification in 40 test cohort samples, including 16 (40.0%) responders, was performed to identify miRNAs that are differentially expressed in chemotherapy responders and non-responders. Differential expression was confirmed in a validation cohort (n = 63 samples), including 18 (28.6%) responders. A signature comprising three miRNAs (miR1290, miR196b, and miR135a*) enabled the prediction of a chemotherapeutic response (rather than progression-free and overall survival) with high accuracy in both the test and validation cohorts (82.5% and 77.8%). Examination of the latter was performed using miRNAs extracted from archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Genotype data for the TP53-Arg72Pro polymorphism, which is associated with responses to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, were subsequently incorporated into the prediction analysis. Finally, combining this miRNA signature with the TP53-Arg72Pro polymorphism genotype marginally improved the predictive power (Saito et al., Clin. Cancer Res. 2014). Citation Format: Kouya Shiraishi, Motonobu Saito, Takashi Kohno. Combination of a three-microRNA signature and TP53 genotype predicts responses to platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Translation of the Cancer Genome; Feb 7-9, 2015; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(22 Suppl 1):Abstract nr A1-55.

MMP-9/ANC score as a predictive biomarker for efficacy of bevacizumab plus platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is a key regulator of tumor angiogenesis. To evaluate biomarkers to predict the benefit of paclitaxel and carboplatin plus bevacizumab (PCB) therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Among 21 patients treated with PCB, 10 were included in the good responder group and 11 in the non-responder group. Serum VEGF, MMP-2 and MMP-9 were measured using ELISA. There were no significant differences in these markers levels between groups. However, the good responder group showed a significantly higher pre-treatment MMP-9/ absolute neutrophil count (ANC) score than the non-responder group before the treatment (p= 0.014), and there was a positive correlation between the score and the tumor reduction rate (r= 0.57, p= 0.016). Furthermore, by dividing patients into a high scoring group (MMP-9/ANC ≥ median, n= 11) and a low scoring group (MMP-9/ANC < median, n= 10), former group showed a significant improvement in the median progression-free survival compared with latter group (636 vs. 196 days, p = 0.032). MMP-9/ANC score before PCB treatment may be a suitable biomarker to assess the anti-tumor effects of PCB therapy.

Safety and efficacy of MPDL3280A (anti-PDL1) in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8030 Background: MPDL3280A, which preserves the PD-L2/PD-1 interaction to potentially diminish autoimmune lung toxicity, has promising activity in advanced NSCLC. Platinum-based doublet chemotherap...