Double-row Suture Bridge Research Articles

Modified double-row suture bridge technique for anterior colliculus fractures combined with deltoid ligament injury: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe management of anterior colliculus fractures in combination with deltoid ligament injuries is a topic of debate, and there is a need to improve surgical outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to describe the application of a modified double-row suture bridge technique and evaluate its early clinical outcomes in the management of anterior colliculus fracture combined with deltoid ligament injury.MethodsFrom 2020 to 2022, 12 patients with anterior colliculus fracture combined with deltoid ligament injury were treated using a modified double-row suture bridge technique. For clinical outcome evaluation, objective data are presented through clinical examination findings; radiographic assessments, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT); and follow-up analysis utilizing American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle‒hindfoot (AOFAS) scores, Olerud Molander Ankle Scores (OMAS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Preoperative and follow-up scores were compared with Student’s t test. (p < .05).ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 52.67 ± 9.42 years (range: 39–74). The mean duration of follow-up was 14.42 ± 1.51 months (range: 12–17). At the final follow-up, the mean AOFAS score (P < 0.001) improved to 91.50 ± 2.65 points (range: 87–96), the mean OMAS (P < 0.001) improved to 77.08 ± 3.97 points (range: 70–85), and the mean VAS score (P < 0.001) improved to 0.25 ± 0.45 points (range: 0–1). Nine patients achieved excellent outcomes, and three achieved good outcomes according to the AOFAS score. Follow-up imaging evaluation indicated satisfactory alignment of the fracture and complete healing. Clinical examination suggested good mobility of the ankle. At the last follow-up, ankle dorsiflexion mobility was 14–18 degrees, plantar flexion mobility was 42–45 degrees, inversion mobility was 27–32 degrees, and eversion mobility was 22–25 degrees.ConclusionsThe modified double-row suture bridge technique is effective for achieving anatomic reduction of anterior colliculus fractures, and the technique also provides substantial benefit to the injured deltoid ligament. With this technique, the clinical outcomes can be significant and encouraging, indicating a new stage in its application and development.

Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic reduction and double row-suture bridge for large-sized greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus.

Currently, there is limited information on the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for large greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for these fractures, hypothesizing that arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation is a safe, effective and minimally invasive treatment for large greater tuberosity fractures. This retrospective study analysed patients with large greater tuberosity fractures (fracture fragment ≥30 mm in diameter) who underwent arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation and had a follow-up period exceeding 2 years. The anatomic reduction was confirmed by assessing the step-off on radiographs immediately after surgery, and the radiologic union time was recorded. At the final follow-up, range of motion and functional outcome scores were evaluated. Additionally, any surgery-related complications were evaluated. Fifteen patients with a mean follow-up of 57.7 ± 23.1 months were included in the study. The mean fracture fragment size was 32.5 ± 2.4 mm, with a mean displacement of 5.1 ± 1.6 mm. Immediately postsurgery, 13 of 15 patients (86.7%) had a fracture step-off of <3 mm, with an average union time of 3 months. At the final follow-up, patients demonstrated excellent outcomes, with an average forward flexion of 167 ± 9.7° and external rotation of 70 ± 16.3. Functional outcome scores showed significant improvement compared with preoperative scores (p < 0.001). No major surgery-related complications were reported. Arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for large-sized greater tuberosity fractures is safe and shows good fracture reduction and excellent clinical outcomes. Therefore, this surgical method can be considered an alternative to open reduction for large greater tuberosity fractures. Level IV.

The Use of a Suture Bridge Technique for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Under 40 Years of Age Resulted in Successful Tendon Healing, Pain Relief, Improved Shoulder Function, and High Patient Satisfaction at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and imaging outcomes after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tear (RCT) using a suture bridge technique in patients under 40 years of age. MethodA consecutive series of patients who were treated arthroscopically for RCT by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Both full thickness tears and partial tears were included. Arthroscopic cuff repair employed a knotless double-row suture bridge technique, utilizing braided suture tapes. To assess clinical outcomes, we employed the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), a strength score, and a visual analog scale (VAS). Tendon healing was evaluated at 12 months using the Sugaya MRI classification. ResultsA total of 63 patients were included in the study. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 33.6 years (range, 21 to 40) and minimum follow up duration was 5 years. Thirty-nine patients reported occasional sports, eight were professional athletes, while sixteen reported no sportive activity prior to first symptoms. Mean follow-up duration was 66.8 months (range, 62.4 to 88.6 months). A significant improvement was observed in both the Constant score and ASES score. The mean Constant score increased significantly from 39.8 (range, 29 to 52) points to 88.9 (range, 34 to 100) points postoperatively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the ASES score improved significantly from 41.8 (range, 30 to 64) to 90.2 (range, 35 to 100, p < 0.001). Anterior flexion mean improved from 86° (range: 60° to 110°) to 137° (range, 90° to 180°, p < 0.001). Pain significantly decreased after the surgery, VAS descending from 6.3 (range, 3 to 10) to 1.3 (range, 0 to 9) postoperatively. The overall rate of return to previous activities in the cohort was 84% at an average of 10.1 months (range, 6 to 12 months) after surgery. Among the included patients, 85% engaging in occasional sports activities and 67% of elite athletes similarly returned to their pre-injury sports levels after 9.8 (range, 6 to 12) months and 10.7 months (range, 6 to 12) respectively. Two patients (3%) experienced cuff re-rupture, and tendon non-healing (Sugaya stage 3 and stage 4) was observed in five (7%) patients. At the final follow-up, 95% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with their functional results. ConclusionThe use of a suture bridge technique in arthroscopic RCT repair for patients under 40 years of age resulted in excellent long-term outcomes, including successful tendon healing, pain relief, improved shoulder function, and high patient satisfaction.

Rotator Cuff Repairs Using Double-Row Modified Mason-Allen Stitches Resulted in Superior Clinical Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up Compared to the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique: A Case-Control Matching Study

Rotator Cuff Repairs Using Double-Row Modified Mason-Allen Stitches Resulted in Superior Clinical Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up Compared to the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique: A Case-Control Matching Study

Effect of Preoperative Lipidemic Control on Retear Rates After Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients With Hyperlipidemia

Background: In patients with hyperlipidemia, the risk of retear increases after rotator cuff repair (RCR). In particular, it has been reported that preoperative low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level affects cuff integrity. However, there are no studies assessing whether lipidemic control affects cuff healing. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of preoperative lipidemic control on cuff integrity after arthroscopic RCR across cardiovascular disease risk groups in patients with hyperlipidemia. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with hyperlipidemia who underwent arthroscopic double-row suture bridge RCR between 2014 and 2019. The included patients had LDL-C tested within 1 month before surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging was conducted 6 months after surgery to evaluate the integrity of the repaired cuff tendon. Patients were divided into groups of low, moderate, high, and very high risk according to the 4th Korean Dyslipidemia Guidelines. On the basis of the target LDL-C set in each risk group, patients were categorized into 2 groups: group C (controlled hyperlipidemia, less than target LDL-C) and group U (uncontrolled hyperlipidemia, target LDL-C or greater). The correlation between serum lipid profile, lipidemic control, and post-RCR integrity was evaluated. Results: A total of 148 patients were analyzed, 51 in group U and 97 in group C. The retear rate was significantly higher in group U than in group C (23/51 [45.1%] vs 18/97 [18.6%], respectively; P = .001). The proportion of group U was significantly higher in the retear group than in the healing group (56.1% vs 26.2%; P = .001). In addition, the proportions of patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) (19.5% vs 3.7%; P = .002) and mediolateral (2.6 ± 1.2 cm vs 1.7 ± 1.1 cm; P < .001) and anteroposterior (2.2 ± 1.1 cm vs 1.6 ± 0.8 cm; P = .003) tear sizes were significantly different between the retear and healing groups, respectively. No significant difference in serum lipid profile, including LDL-C level (119.6 ± 31.3 vs 116.7 ± 37.2; P = .650), was observed between the retear and healing groups. Multivariate regression analysis identified uncontrolled hyperlipidemia (OR, 4.005; P = .001), uncontrolled DM (OR, 5.096; P = .022), and mediolateral tear size (OR, 1.764; P = .002) as independent risk factors for retear. The 2.0-cm mediolateral size cutoff and the 3 independent risk factors had significant associations with retear. Conclusion: Poor preoperative lipidemic control was significantly associated with poor healing after RCR. In addition to large mediolateral tear size, uncontrolled hyperlipidemia and DM were significant risk factors for retear. Moreover, poor lipidemic control compared with the recommended target level before surgery was more correlated with an increased retear rate than a preoperative LDL-C level.

The Relationship Between All-Suture and Solid Medial-Row Anchors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Double-Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair.

The use of all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair is increasing. Potential benefits include decreased bone loss and decreased damage to the chondral surface. Minimal evidence exists comparing outcomes among medial-row anchor fixation methods in double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair. To compare the clinical outcomes between all-suture and solid medial-row anchors in double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. A total of 352 patients (mean age at surgery, 60.3 years) underwent double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair at our institution. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on whether they underwent all-suture (n = 280) or solid (n = 72) anchor fixation for the medial row. Outcomes data were collected via an ongoing longitudinal data repository or through telephone calls (minimum follow-up time, 2.0 years; mean follow-up time, 3.0 years). Outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) standardized shoulder assessment form and the visual analog scale (VAS). The same rehabilitation protocol was administered to all patients. The proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were calculated for the outcome measures, and outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds between groups were compared using linear and logistic regression, respectively. The groups did not differ in terms of age at surgery, sex distribution, rotator cuff tear size, or number of medial-row anchors used. The solid anchor group had a longer follow-up time compared with the all-suture anchor group (3.6 ± 0.7 vs 2.8 ± 0.8 years, respectively; P < .01). After controlling for follow-up time, the solid and all-suture anchor groups did not differ in ASES scores (89.6 ± 17.8 vs 88.8 ± 16.7, respectively; P = .44) or VAS scores (1.1 ± 2.1 vs 1.2 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .37). Similarly, after controlling for follow-up time, the solid and all-suture anchor groups did not differ in the proportions of patients meeting PASS cutoffs for the ASES (84.7% vs 80.7%, respectively; P = .44) or the VAS (80.6% vs 75.0%, respectively; P = .83). Double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors for medial-row fixation demonstrated similar excellent clinical outcomes to rotator cuff repair using solid medial-row anchors.

Arthroscopic suture bridge fixation for acute bony Bankart with anterior glenohumeral instability: a case report and narrative review.

Anterior shoulder dislocations can result in acute glenoid rim fractures that compromise the bony stability of the glenohumeral joint. Adequate fixation of these fractures is required to restore stability, decrease shoulder pain, and facilitate return to activity. The double-row suture bridge is a relatively novel fixation technique, first described in 2009, that accomplishes internal fixation with sufficient stability using an all-arthroscopic technique to restore the glenoid footprint. A 40-year-old female with recurrent anterior shoulder instability in the setting of seizure disorder was found to have a bony Bankart lesion of 25% to 30% with a concomitant superior labral tear. The patient was treated with a double-row bony Bankart bridge and labral repair. At six months follow-up, she has progressed to a full recovery with no recurrence. A search was conducted in May 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL with the search terms bony Bankart, bone Bankart, osseous Bankart, acute, bridge, suture bridge, double row. Double-row suture bridge repairs result in improvement in shoulder function as determined by ASES (93.5), QuickDASH (4.5), SANE (95.9), and SF-12 (55.6). The overall recurrence rate of anterior instability after a bony Bankart bridge repair is 8%. When examining the return to prior level of function, 81.4% of patients were able to do so with only 7.9% of patients reporting significant modifications to their activity level. In mid-term results, double row suture bridge demonstrates similar outcomes to other all-arthroscopic fixation methods of bony Bankart injuries. Importantly, bony Bankart bridge remains a viable option for critical glenoid lesions over the 20% cutoff used in other all arthroscopic techniques. Biomechanically, the double-row suture bridge offers distinct benefits over its single-row counterpart including increased compression, reduced displacement, and reduced step-off. Although there is limited data, the studies discussed and the demonstrative case show the potential benefit of all-arthroscopic double-row suture bridge fixation including increased compression, decreased displacement, and a lower complication rate in patients with large bony Bankart lesions traditionally requiring bony augmentation. However, more robust studies are necessary to determine the long-term success of the double-row suture bridge.

Semi–Bone Tunnel Technique Using Double-Row Suture Bridge Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma Hydrogel for Rotator Cuff Repair in a Rabbit Model

Background: The approach to managing the footprint area and reconstructing the tendon-bone interface (TBI) is critical for optimal healing. Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of the semi–bone tunnel (SBT) technique using a double-row suture bridge combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) hydrogel for rotator cuff repair in a rabbit model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 48 New Zealand White rabbits were divided into 4 groups. The supraspinatus tendons were severed at the footprint to create a rotator cuff tear model in the surgical groups. Rabbits were treated with the traditional onto-surface repair (control group), SBT technique (SBT group), and SBT technique combined with PRP hydrogel implantation (SBT+PRP group). The rabbits without surgery were the normal group. At 8 weeks after surgery, macroscopic observation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and micro–computed tomography (μCT) examinations, histological evaluations, and biomechanical tests were performed to assess the curative effects of the given treatments. Results: The MRI results showed that the repaired supraspinatus tendon presented a uniform signal, minimal inflammatory response, and the lowest signal-to-noise quotient value in the SBT+PRP group. The μCT results suggested that the SBT technique did not reduce the local bone mineral density in the TBI area compared with the onto-surface repair technique. The histological staining results showed that the regenerated TBI in the SBT+PRP group had a 4-layer structure similar to the natural tissue. The highest values for biomechanical properties were observed in the SBT+PRP group, and there was no significant difference between the SBT+PRP group and normal group. Conclusion: The SBT technique presented a better tendon-bone healing effect for rotator cuff tear in the rabbit model compared with the traditional onto-surface repair technique. The specimens in the SBT+PRP group had a similar TBI structure and biomechanical properties to the natural tissue. Clinical Relevance: The SBT technique can be an alternative surgical approach for rotator cuff repair, especially for moderate to large tears and cases requiring scaffold implantation.

Biomechanical comparison of suture bridge rotator cuff repair with and without dermal allograft pledgets

BackgroundOne method to augment rotator cuff repair is to pass dermal allograft pledgets along the sutures that bridge from the medial to the lateral row. It remains unclear whether this augmentation method alters repair biomechanics. MethodsThis was a controlled laboratory study. After an a priori power analysis, nine pairs of rotator cuffs underwent double row suture bridge rotator cuff repair, half randomized to augmentation with dermal allograft pledgets passed along the suture bridge sutures. Repairs were then mounted on a material testing system and loaded cyclically 500 cycles to mesure applied force and displacement. Repairs then underwent ultimate failure testing and stiffness, ultimate failure force, and ultimate failure displacement were measured. Paired t-tests were performed to compare between groups. ResultsThere were no differences between groups in construct gapping with cyclic loading after 500 cycles (p = 0.885). There no differences between the augmented and control groups in yield force (103.5 ± 5.0 vs. 101.4 ± 5.9 N, respectively, p=0.183), stiffness (94.2 ± 13.9 vs. 90.9 ± 13.8, p=0.585), or ultimate failure force (255.3 ± 65.8 vs. 285.3 ± 83.2, p=0.315). There were no differences between groups in failure modes, with most specimens failing by cuff tissue tearing within or medial to the construct. ConclusionThe addition of dermal allograft pledgets does not positively or negatively influence the time-zero biomechanical characteristics of double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair.

Arthroscopic Stabilization of Osteochondral Fracture of the Anterior-Inferior Glenoid Using Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique

Osteochondral fracture of the glenoid can be caused by traumatic damage in the shoulder, and addressing this injury can be challenging due to the complexity of the condition and the various treatment options. Left untreated, this injury can lead to post-traumatic arthritis and shoulder instability. There have been different surgical techniques for addressing osteochondral fracture, including open and arthroscopic methods, such as debridement, screw fixation, and bone graft, but there is a lack of a universally accepted treatment guidelines. In this technical note, the authors introduce a simple stabilization method for an osteochondral fracture of anterior-inferior glenoid using double-row suture bridge technique through trans-subscapularis portal created by an “inside-out” technique.

Arthroscopic transosseous anchorless rotator cuff repair reduces bone defects related to peri-implant cyst formation: a comparison with conventional suture anchors using propensity score matching.

The transosseous anchorless repair (ToR) technique was recently introduced to avoid suture anchor-related problems. While favorable outcomes of the ToR technique have been reported, no previous studies on peri-implant cyst formation with the ToR technique exist. Therefore, this study compared the clinical outcomes and prevalence of peri-implant cyst formation between the ToR technique and the conventional transosseous equivalent technique using suture anchors (SA). Cases with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) between 2016 and 2018 treated with the double-row suture bridge technique were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into ToR and SA groups. To compare clinical outcomes, 19 ToR and 57 SA cases without intraoperative implant failure were selected using propensity score matching (PSM). While intraoperative implant failure rate was analyzed before PSM, retear rate, peri-implant cyst formation rate, and functional outcomes were compared after PSM. The intraoperative implant failure rate (ToR, 8% vs. SA, 15.3%) and retear rate (ToR, 5.3% vs. SA, 19.3%) did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05). However, peri-implant cysts were not observed in the ToR group, while they were observed in 16.7% of the SA group (P=0.008). Postoperative functional outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). The ToR technique produced comparable clinical outcomes to conventional techniques. Considering the possibility of additional surgeries, the absence of peri-implant cyst formation might be an advantage of ToR. Furthermore, ToR might reduce the medical costs related to suture anchors and, thereby, could be a useful option for ARCR.

Outcomes of Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Novel All-Suture Soft Anchor Medial Row.

Few studies have examined the short-term clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) with all-suture anchors for medial row anchor fixation. To evaluate clinical outcomes of double-row suture bridge RCR using a novel all-suture medial row anchor. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. We enrolled 179 patients before double-row suture bridge RCR (mean age at surgery, 60.0 years; 63% male patients) at a single institution. All patients underwent RCR with all-suture anchor fixation for the medial row and solid anchor fixation for the lateral row. Preoperative (baseline) and follow-up (minimum follow-up time of 2 years; mean, 2.5 years) clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and a 10-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). We calculated the proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the ASES (≥78.0) and NPRS (≤1.7). We further compared baseline and follow-up outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds using paired t tests and McNemar tests, respectively, and calculated effect size to quantify the magnitude of change from baseline to follow-up. Values significantly improved from baseline to follow-up for ASES (from 45.3 ± 19.8 to 87.3 ± 17.1) and NPRS (from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 1.4 ± 2.1). The proportion of patients meeting PASS thresholds also significantly improved for the ASES (from 6% to 77%) and the NPRS (from 7% to 72%). The magnitude of baseline to follow-up change for all measures was large (all effect sizes ≥1.5). Our study demonstrated excellent short-term clinical outcomes and substantial improvements for patients undergoing double-row suture bridge RCR with all-suture anchors for medial row fixation.

Poster 195: Retrospective Outcomes of Primary Rotator Cuff Repairs Involving Two or More Tendons

Poster 195: Retrospective Outcomes of Primary Rotator Cuff Repairs Involving Two or More Tendons

Rotator cuff repairs with all-suture tape anchors: no difference in outcomes between with or without all-suture tape anchors.

This study aimed at comparing the outcomes of medium- to large-sized rotator cuff repairs performed using the suture bridge technique either with or without tape-like sutures, and single row techniques with conventional sutures. A total of 135 eligible patients with medium to large rotator cuff tears were identified and analyzed retrospectively, from 2017 to 2019. Only repairs using all-suture anchors were included in the study. Patients were divided into the following three groups: single-row (SR) repair (N = 50), standard double-row suture bridge (DRSB) repair with conventional sutures (N = 35), and DRSB with tape-like sutures (N = 50). The average postoperative follow-up period was 26.3 ± 9.8months (range, 18-37). DRSB with tapes had the highest re-tear rate of 16% (8/50), but there was no significant difference with the re-tear rates observed in SR (8%, 4/50) and DRSB with conventional sutures (11.4%, 4/35) (n.s.). DRSB with tapes demonstrated higher rate of type 2 re-tears (10%) compared to type 1 re-tears (6%), but the other two groups showed either similar or higher rates of type 1 re-tears compared to that of type 2. Post-operative functional scores of the three groups improved significantly (all p < 0.05), but the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. No clinical difference in functional outcomes and re-tear rates were observed in DRSB with tapes when compared with SR and DRSB using the conventional sutures. Tape-like DRSB suture which was expected to be superior by its biomechanical advantage was clinically non-superior to conventional DRSB suture. There were no significant differences in VAS scores and UCLA scores. Level III.

Effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic single/double-row suture techniques in repairing of moderate rotator cuff tears

To compare the early effectiveness of arthroscopic repair of moderate rotator cuff tears with single-row modified Mason-Allen technique and double-row suture bridge technique. The clinical data of 40 patients with moderate rotator cuff tears who met the selection criteria between January 2021 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 20 cases were repaired with single-row modified Mason-Allen suture technique (single-row group) and 20 cases with double-row suture bridge technique (double-row group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, rotator cuff tear size, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant-Murley score, and T2* value between the two groups ( P>0.05). The VAS score, Constant-Murley score (including subjective influence, pain, flexion, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and muscle strength score) were compared between the two groups before operation and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. Functional MRI and ultrashort-echo-time (UTE)-T2* technique were performed to calculate T2* value and quantitatively evaluate the healing of rotator cuff tissue; and the healing of rotator cuff was evaluated by Sugaya classification at 12 months after operation. Patients in both groups were followed up 1 year. There was no complication such as muscle atrophy, joint stiffness, or postoperative rotator cuff tear. The intra-group comparison showed that the scores of pain, subjective influence, flexion, abduction, and muscle strength in Constant-Murley scores at each time point after operation in the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation, while VAS scores were significantly lower than those before operation ( P<0.05). Internal rotation, external rotation, and total score of Constant-Murley score in the two groups were lower at 6 weeks due to abduction immobilization within 6 weeks after operation, and gradually increased at 6 months after operation, with significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation when compared with those before operation and at 6 weeks after operation ( P<0.05). The T2* values of the two groups showed a downward trend over time, and there were significant differences between the two groups at other time points ( P<0.05), except that there was no significant difference between at 6 and 12 months after operation in the single-row group and between at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation in the double-row group ( P>0.05). The comparison between groups showed that the VAS score and T2* values of the double-row group were significantly lower than those of the single-row group at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation ( P<0.05). The scores of subjective influence, flexion, abduction, and internal rotation in the double-row group were significantly better than those in the single-row group at 6 weeks and 3 months after operation ( P<0.05), and the external rotation score and total score in the double-row group were significantly better than those in the single-row group at 3 months after operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference at 6 and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in muscle strength and pain scores between the two groups at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the results of Sugaya classification between the two groups at 12 months after operation ( Z=1.060, P=0.289). The effectiveness of arthroscopic repair of moderate rotator cuff tears with modified Mason-Allen technique and double-row suture bridge technique is satisfactory, but suture bridge technique is helpful to the early rehabilitation training of shoulder joint and the recovery of motor function of patients.

Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair Technique: A Technical Note

Introduction: Labrum is a static stabilitator of the glenohumeral joint. Tear to this fibrocartilaginous structure could cause shoulder instability. Lately, anterior detachment of labrum is known as a contributor to recurrent anterior instability. Anterior labrum detachments are the classic Bankart lesion. Bankart lesion involving avulsion fracture is known as bony Bankart lesion. Management for this lesion is done operatively by doing antomical repair to return rigidity to its original state. Bankart repairs were originally done openly with coracoid osteotomy and subscapularis tenotomy. Currently, arthroscopic Bankart repair is often used as the preferred surgical management. Variations of portal placements, suture placements, suture technique and other components of Bankart repair can be found today, giving options for surgeons to achieve optimal results. Surgical Technique: In athletes, bony Bankart lesion, as an intraarticular lesion with displaced labrum and avulsion causing instability, is an absolute indication for surgical intervention to ensure function return. Nonoperative treatments have been reported on small bony Bankart lesions, but outcome on follow-up showed 25% recurrent instability. We performed arthroscopic bony Brankart repair by implementing labral repair, intraosesus tunneling and double-row suture bridge techniques. First, landmarks of incisions and portals were made. Incisions for visualisation were then done. Anterior portal and posterior portal were established before identifying bony Bankart lesion. A 5 o’ clock, trans subscapularis portal was then created. We released the bony Bankart and curatage the margin. A 6 o’clock stitch was anchored through rigid suture passage (drilled bone tunnel) in 5 o’clock direction. A 4.30 o’clock stitch was anchored in a 4 o’clock suture passage. The last stitch was a 3 o’clock stitch anchored through a 3 o’clock passage. Soft tissue release was conducted until subscapularis fibers were exposed. In the remodelling process, we performed overcorrection repair. Modifications done to the Bankart repair in this paper were done to achieve excellent post-op anterior stabilization.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of simple double-row suture bridge technique and double-row suture bridge technique combined with type Ⅱ "Chinese way" in the treatment of huge rotator cuff injury

Objective: To compare the postoperative efficacy of simple double-row suture bridge technique and double-row suture bridge technique combined with type Ⅱ "Chinese way" in treating huge massive rotator cuff injury. Methods: The clinical data of 74 patients with unilateral massive rotator cuff injury admitted to Department of Orthopedic, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January 2019 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 39 males and 35 females, aged (60.2±7.8) years (range: 42 to 77 years). During operation, 44 patients were treated with single double-row suture bridge technique (the simple group), and 30 patients were treated with double-row suture bridge technique combined with type Ⅱ "Chinese way" treatment (the combined group). In the simple group, only internal and external row anchors were used to fix the fractured rotator cuff, while in the combined group, the biceps long head tendon was first transposed to the footprint area and fixed with an internal row anchor tail thread, and then the remaining rotator cuff fracture was repaired with double-row suture bridge technique. The operation conditions were recorded. The range of motion of shoulder joint, visual analogue scale (VAS), American Society for Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Constant-Murley shoulder joint score before operation, 6 months after operation and at the last follow-up were compared between the two groups. Postoperative complications and imaging results were recorded. The difference values of each observation index before and after operation were calculated. The repeated measures analysis of variance was used for repeated measurement data, and LSD multiple comparison method was used for the data at different time points in the two groups. Results: All the patients successfully completed the operation, and no serious complications occurred during or after operation. The patients were followed up for (14.6±5.4) months (range: 6 to 24 months). In all patients, the shoulder range of motion, VAS, ASES score, UCLA score and Constant-Murley shoulder score at 6 months after operation and at the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before operation (all P<0.01), and the results at the last follow-up were also better than those at 6 months after operation (all P<0.01). The results of the combined group at 6 months after operation and at the last follow-up (all P<0.01) were better than those of the single group. At 6 months after operation and at the last follow-up, the anteroposternal X-ray showed no significant progress in the degeneration of shoulder joint. Of the 27 patients who completed MRI during follow-up, 14 patients re-injured of reconstructed rotator cuff tissue (type Ⅳ and type Ⅴ) was found in 14 cases, the incidence was 22.7% (10/44) in the simple group and 13.3%(4/30) in the combined group. There was no significant difference between the two groups(χ2=1.026, P=0.311). Conclusion: Compared with the simple double-row suture bridge technique, the method of double-row suture bridge technique combined with type Ⅱ "Chinese way" for repairing massive rotator cuff injury has better effect on improving the short-term pain symptoms, joint range of motion, restoring joint function, and has lower incidence of complications.

Increased HbA1c Levels in Diabetics During the Postoperative 3-6 Months After Rotator Cuff Repair Correlated With Increased Retear Rates

To evaluate whether glycemic control affects the integrity of the repaired rotator cuff during the postoperative healing period after arthroscopic double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair (RCR) METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent arthroscopic double-row suture bridge RCR at our institution between March 2016 and November 2019. We included the patients who evaluated for serum glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels within 1 month before and 3-6 months after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging was conducted 6 months after surgery to evaluate the integrity of the repaired cuff tendon. Patients were categorized into two groups based on comparison between preoperative and postoperative HbA1c values: Group I (increased postoperative HbA1c) and Group D (same or decreased postoperative HbA1c). The correlation between preoperative/postoperative HbA1c, HbA1c increase/same or decrease (during the healing period), and post-RCR integrity was evaluated, including various demographic and radiologic factors. A total of 103 patients were analyzed, group I was 47, and group D was 56, respectively. The retear rate of 51.1% (24/47) in Group I was significantly higher than 14.3% (8/56) in Group D (P < .001). HbA1c levels measured 3-6 months after surgery (mean: 6.9; 95% CI: 6.6-7.3 vs mean: 6.5; 95% CI: 6.3-6.7, P= .034), and the proportion of group I and group D were significantly different (75%/25% vs 32.4%/67.6%, P < .001) between the retear and healing groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified increased HbA1c as an independent risk factor for retear (odds ratio: 5.402; 95% CI: 2.072-14.086; P < .001). The glycemic control within 3-6 months after surgery when the healing process of the tendon was in progress had a significant effect on retear rate. In particular, the retear rate was higher when the HbA1c level increased at postoperative 3-6 months compared to before surgery. Retrospective case-control comparative study, Level III.

Knotless Tendoscopic Peroneal Retinaculum Repair Technique for Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Peroneal tendon dislocation (PTD) is sometimes diagnosed as a sports-related injury, of which many cases lead to recurrent PTD (RPTD). Superior retinaculum repair is the major operative treatment of RPTD. The technique described herein comprises 8 steps: (1) Standard tendoscopic examination, (2) debridement of the pseudo-pouch base, (3) first anchor insertion, (4) suture relay, (5) second anchor insertion and suture relay, (6) third anchor insertion and suture relay, (7) suture tightening, and (8) suture bridge. Although this tendoscopic peroneal retinaculum repair technique is complicated, expensive, and requires a longer operation time, it incorporates a double-row suture bridge. Therefore, it has a wider contact surface between the superior retinaculum repair and fibula bone and tighter fixation than does a single-row technique. Moreover, our technique is knotless and thereby avoids knot-related complications. Tendoscopy has additional advantages in terms of less postoperative pain, fewer complications, and better cosmesis. In conclusion, this knotless tendoscopic peroneal retinaculum repair technique for RPTD is a patient-friendly surgery compared with previous procedures.

Clinical outcomes following surgical management of insertional Achilles tendinopathy using a double-row suture bridge technique with mean two-year follow-up.

The clinical outcomes following surgical management of insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) vary depending on the surgical technique used to reattach the Achilles tendon following debridement. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with IAT who underwent surgical management with a double-row suture bridge technique used to reattach the Achilles tendon. A retrospective review of consecutive patients diagnosed with IAT, who underwent surgical management utilising a double-row suture bridge technique (Arthex Speedbridge), and a minimum of 3-month follow-up were included. The primary outcome was the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) Index score which is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM). Secondary outcomes included EuroQol EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life PROM and complication rates. Between July 2013 and June 2020, 50 consecutive patients (23 male; 27 female) were included. The mean age (± standard deviation) was 52.3 ± 11.3 (range 29.0-84.3). Pre- and post-operative PROM data were available for all cases. The mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.9years. The MOXFQ Index score improved from 48.5 to 12.4 (p < 0.01), EQ-5D-5L improved from 2.7 ± 0.46 to 1.2 ± 0.37 (p < 0.01), and EQ-VAS improved from 48.0 ± 18.4 to 84.1 ± 12.6 (p < 0.01). Four patients had complications which were of minimal clinical relevance and caused no deviation from routine recovery. There were no cases of tendon rupture. This study has demonstrated that surgical management of IAT is safe and effective with clinical improvement in both clinical and general health-related quality of life outcome PROMs. IV.