Double-row Suture Research Articles

Modified double-row suture bridge technique for anterior colliculus fractures combined with deltoid ligament injury: a retrospective study.

The management of anterior colliculus fractures in combination with deltoid ligament injuries is a topic of debate, and there is a need to improve surgical outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to describe the application of a modified double-row suture bridge technique and evaluate its early clinical outcomes in the management of anterior colliculus fracture combined with deltoid ligament injury. From 2020 to 2022, 12 patients with anterior colliculus fracture combined with deltoid ligament injury were treated using a modified double-row suture bridge technique. For clinical outcome evaluation, objective data are presented through clinical examination findings; radiographic assessments, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT); and follow-up analysis utilizing American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle‒hindfoot (AOFAS) scores, Olerud Molander Ankle Scores (OMAS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Preoperative and follow-up scores were compared with Student's t test. (p < .05). The mean age of the patients was 52.67 ± 9.42 years (range: 39-74). The mean duration of follow-up was 14.42 ± 1.51 months (range: 12-17). At the final follow-up, the mean AOFAS score (P < 0.001) improved to 91.50 ± 2.65 points (range: 87-96), the mean OMAS (P < 0.001) improved to 77.08 ± 3.97 points (range: 70-85), and the mean VAS score (P < 0.001) improved to 0.25 ± 0.45 points (range: 0-1). Nine patients achieved excellent outcomes, and three achieved good outcomes according to the AOFAS score. Follow-up imaging evaluation indicated satisfactory alignment of the fracture and complete healing. Clinical examination suggested good mobility of the ankle. At the last follow-up, ankle dorsiflexion mobility was 14-18 degrees, plantar flexion mobility was 42-45 degrees, inversion mobility was 27-32 degrees, and eversion mobility was 22-25 degrees. The modified double-row suture bridge technique is effective for achieving anatomic reduction of anterior colliculus fractures, and the technique also provides substantial benefit to the injured deltoid ligament. With this technique, the clinical outcomes can be significant and encouraging, indicating a new stage in its application and development.

Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic reduction and double row-suture bridge for large-sized greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus.

Currently, there is limited information on the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for large greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for these fractures, hypothesizing that arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation is a safe, effective and minimally invasive treatment for large greater tuberosity fractures. This retrospective study analysed patients with large greater tuberosity fractures (fracture fragment ≥30 mm in diameter) who underwent arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation and had a follow-up period exceeding 2 years. The anatomic reduction was confirmed by assessing the step-off on radiographs immediately after surgery, and the radiologic union time was recorded. At the final follow-up, range of motion and functional outcome scores were evaluated. Additionally, any surgery-related complications were evaluated. Fifteen patients with a mean follow-up of 57.7 ± 23.1 months were included in the study. The mean fracture fragment size was 32.5 ± 2.4 mm, with a mean displacement of 5.1 ± 1.6 mm. Immediately postsurgery, 13 of 15 patients (86.7%) had a fracture step-off of <3 mm, with an average union time of 3 months. At the final follow-up, patients demonstrated excellent outcomes, with an average forward flexion of 167 ± 9.7° and external rotation of 70 ± 16.3. Functional outcome scores showed significant improvement compared with preoperative scores (p < 0.001). No major surgery-related complications were reported. Arthroscopic reduction and double-row suture bridge fixation for large-sized greater tuberosity fractures is safe and shows good fracture reduction and excellent clinical outcomes. Therefore, this surgical method can be considered an alternative to open reduction for large greater tuberosity fractures. Level IV.

Double Row Hip Abductor Reconstruction with Fasciae Latae Transfer for Severe Trendelenburg after Hip Arthroplasty

Background/Objectives: Tendinopathy of the gluteus medius and minimus tendons is a primary source of lateral hip pain, ranging from interstitial and partial-thickness tears to complete tears. Treatments include muscle transfers, Achilles tendon allograft procedures, and primary repairs with allografts. This study evaluated the one-year outcomes of gluteus medius and minimus reconstruction using an open double-row technique with a partial tensor fasciae latae transfer for severe Trendelenburg post-total hip arthroplasty. Methods: A prospective study involving eight patients who underwent surgery from April to December 2023 was conducted. The surgery involved an open technique with double-row suture reinforcement and tensor fasciae latae autograft. Outcomes were measured using strength, the Harris Hip Score (HHS), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Hip Outcome Tool (HOT), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Follow-ups occurred at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: At an average follow-up of 7.17 months, significant improvements in both hip function and quality of life were observed. The SF-12 quality of life score increased from 27 preoperatively to 34 by month 12. Hip functionality, as measured by the HHS, showed a marked improvement from 48 to 94 points, particularly after six months. The HOT score for hip functionality rose by 23 points by the third month, reaching an average of 86 points. Similarly, the iHOT score increased from 20 to 83 points starting at month 3, reflecting substantial improvements in hip function. Statistically significant improvements were noted at as early as month 3 (p = 0.02), with highly significant gains by month 6 (p &lt; 0.01), which remained stable through month 12 (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: Reconstruction of the gluteus medius and minimus tendons using an open double-row technique with a partial tensor fasciae latae transfer significantly enhances hip function and quality of life. Over an average follow-up period of 7.17 months, patients experienced notable improvements. This technique is an effective option for treating lateral hip pain due to tendinopathy.

H-Loop Knotless Double-Row Repair Versus Krackow Repair for Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Biomechanical Study in a Cadaveric Model.

Surgery is widely recognized as an effective treatment for Achilles tendon rupture; however, there remains debate regarding the optimal surgical approach. To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 techniques, the H-loop knotless double-row (HLDR) suture repair and the Krackow suture repair, for Achilles tendon rupture in a cadaveric model. Controlled laboratory study. Ten matched Achilles tendon specimens from 5 male and 5 female donors were obtained. Each specimen from a matched pair was randomly distributed to 1 of 2 repair groups, the HLDR group or the Krackow group. Tendon elongation was recorded after exposure to 10, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 load cycles. The gap distance after application of a 100-N force, the force needed to produce a 2-mm gap, and the load to failure were measured. All biomechanical properties were compared between the HLDR and Krackow groups using the paired t test. The HLDR group consistently exhibited significantly less elongation than the Krackow group after exposure to the 7 load cycles (P < .01 for all). In addition, the HLDR group exhibited a significantly smaller gap distance after applying a 100-N force (0.30 ± 0.02 vs 8.10 ± 0.46 mm for Krackow group), required significantly more force to generate a 2-mm gap (419.68 ± 39.48 vs 22.29 ± 3.40 N for the Krackow group), and had a significantly higher ultimate failure load (519.91 ± 57.29 vs 220.30 ± 19.27 N for the Krackow group) (P < .01 for all). The study findings demonstrated that the HLDR technique had more advantages compared with the Krackow technique with regard to elongation after different cyclic loadings, gap distance after a 100-N load, force needed to produce a 2-mm gap, and load to failure in a cadaveric model. The HLDR technique could be a viable option for Achilles tendon rupture repair.

Does Functional Rehabilitation Improve Outcomes After Double-row Suture Anchor Repair For Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy?

Does Functional Rehabilitation Improve Outcomes After Double-row Suture Anchor Repair For Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy?

The Use of a Suture Bridge Technique for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Under 40 Years of Age Resulted in Successful Tendon Healing, Pain Relief, Improved Shoulder Function, and High Patient Satisfaction at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and imaging outcomes after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tear (RCT) using a suture bridge technique in patients under 40 years of age. MethodA consecutive series of patients who were treated arthroscopically for RCT by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Both full thickness tears and partial tears were included. Arthroscopic cuff repair employed a knotless double-row suture bridge technique, utilizing braided suture tapes. To assess clinical outcomes, we employed the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), a strength score, and a visual analog scale (VAS). Tendon healing was evaluated at 12 months using the Sugaya MRI classification. ResultsA total of 63 patients were included in the study. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 33.6 years (range, 21 to 40) and minimum follow up duration was 5 years. Thirty-nine patients reported occasional sports, eight were professional athletes, while sixteen reported no sportive activity prior to first symptoms. Mean follow-up duration was 66.8 months (range, 62.4 to 88.6 months). A significant improvement was observed in both the Constant score and ASES score. The mean Constant score increased significantly from 39.8 (range, 29 to 52) points to 88.9 (range, 34 to 100) points postoperatively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the ASES score improved significantly from 41.8 (range, 30 to 64) to 90.2 (range, 35 to 100, p < 0.001). Anterior flexion mean improved from 86° (range: 60° to 110°) to 137° (range, 90° to 180°, p < 0.001). Pain significantly decreased after the surgery, VAS descending from 6.3 (range, 3 to 10) to 1.3 (range, 0 to 9) postoperatively. The overall rate of return to previous activities in the cohort was 84% at an average of 10.1 months (range, 6 to 12 months) after surgery. Among the included patients, 85% engaging in occasional sports activities and 67% of elite athletes similarly returned to their pre-injury sports levels after 9.8 (range, 6 to 12) months and 10.7 months (range, 6 to 12) respectively. Two patients (3%) experienced cuff re-rupture, and tendon non-healing (Sugaya stage 3 and stage 4) was observed in five (7%) patients. At the final follow-up, 95% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with their functional results. ConclusionThe use of a suture bridge technique in arthroscopic RCT repair for patients under 40 years of age resulted in excellent long-term outcomes, including successful tendon healing, pain relief, improved shoulder function, and high patient satisfaction.

Effect of Preoperative Lipidemic Control on Retear Rates After Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients With Hyperlipidemia

Background: In patients with hyperlipidemia, the risk of retear increases after rotator cuff repair (RCR). In particular, it has been reported that preoperative low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level affects cuff integrity. However, there are no studies assessing whether lipidemic control affects cuff healing. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of preoperative lipidemic control on cuff integrity after arthroscopic RCR across cardiovascular disease risk groups in patients with hyperlipidemia. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with hyperlipidemia who underwent arthroscopic double-row suture bridge RCR between 2014 and 2019. The included patients had LDL-C tested within 1 month before surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging was conducted 6 months after surgery to evaluate the integrity of the repaired cuff tendon. Patients were divided into groups of low, moderate, high, and very high risk according to the 4th Korean Dyslipidemia Guidelines. On the basis of the target LDL-C set in each risk group, patients were categorized into 2 groups: group C (controlled hyperlipidemia, less than target LDL-C) and group U (uncontrolled hyperlipidemia, target LDL-C or greater). The correlation between serum lipid profile, lipidemic control, and post-RCR integrity was evaluated. Results: A total of 148 patients were analyzed, 51 in group U and 97 in group C. The retear rate was significantly higher in group U than in group C (23/51 [45.1%] vs 18/97 [18.6%], respectively; P = .001). The proportion of group U was significantly higher in the retear group than in the healing group (56.1% vs 26.2%; P = .001). In addition, the proportions of patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) (19.5% vs 3.7%; P = .002) and mediolateral (2.6 ± 1.2 cm vs 1.7 ± 1.1 cm; P < .001) and anteroposterior (2.2 ± 1.1 cm vs 1.6 ± 0.8 cm; P = .003) tear sizes were significantly different between the retear and healing groups, respectively. No significant difference in serum lipid profile, including LDL-C level (119.6 ± 31.3 vs 116.7 ± 37.2; P = .650), was observed between the retear and healing groups. Multivariate regression analysis identified uncontrolled hyperlipidemia (OR, 4.005; P = .001), uncontrolled DM (OR, 5.096; P = .022), and mediolateral tear size (OR, 1.764; P = .002) as independent risk factors for retear. The 2.0-cm mediolateral size cutoff and the 3 independent risk factors had significant associations with retear. Conclusion: Poor preoperative lipidemic control was significantly associated with poor healing after RCR. In addition to large mediolateral tear size, uncontrolled hyperlipidemia and DM were significant risk factors for retear. Moreover, poor lipidemic control compared with the recommended target level before surgery was more correlated with an increased retear rate than a preoperative LDL-C level.

The Relationship Between All-Suture and Solid Medial-Row Anchors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Double-Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair.

The use of all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair is increasing. Potential benefits include decreased bone loss and decreased damage to the chondral surface. Minimal evidence exists comparing outcomes among medial-row anchor fixation methods in double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair. To compare the clinical outcomes between all-suture and solid medial-row anchors in double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. A total of 352 patients (mean age at surgery, 60.3 years) underwent double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair at our institution. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on whether they underwent all-suture (n = 280) or solid (n = 72) anchor fixation for the medial row. Outcomes data were collected via an ongoing longitudinal data repository or through telephone calls (minimum follow-up time, 2.0 years; mean follow-up time, 3.0 years). Outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) standardized shoulder assessment form and the visual analog scale (VAS). The same rehabilitation protocol was administered to all patients. The proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were calculated for the outcome measures, and outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds between groups were compared using linear and logistic regression, respectively. The groups did not differ in terms of age at surgery, sex distribution, rotator cuff tear size, or number of medial-row anchors used. The solid anchor group had a longer follow-up time compared with the all-suture anchor group (3.6 ± 0.7 vs 2.8 ± 0.8 years, respectively; P < .01). After controlling for follow-up time, the solid and all-suture anchor groups did not differ in ASES scores (89.6 ± 17.8 vs 88.8 ± 16.7, respectively; P = .44) or VAS scores (1.1 ± 2.1 vs 1.2 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .37). Similarly, after controlling for follow-up time, the solid and all-suture anchor groups did not differ in the proportions of patients meeting PASS cutoffs for the ASES (84.7% vs 80.7%, respectively; P = .44) or the VAS (80.6% vs 75.0%, respectively; P = .83). Double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors for medial-row fixation demonstrated similar excellent clinical outcomes to rotator cuff repair using solid medial-row anchors.

Arthroscopic suture bridge fixation for acute bony Bankart with anterior glenohumeral instability: a case report and narrative review.

Anterior shoulder dislocations can result in acute glenoid rim fractures that compromise the bony stability of the glenohumeral joint. Adequate fixation of these fractures is required to restore stability, decrease shoulder pain, and facilitate return to activity. The double-row suture bridge is a relatively novel fixation technique, first described in 2009, that accomplishes internal fixation with sufficient stability using an all-arthroscopic technique to restore the glenoid footprint. A 40-year-old female with recurrent anterior shoulder instability in the setting of seizure disorder was found to have a bony Bankart lesion of 25% to 30% with a concomitant superior labral tear. The patient was treated with a double-row bony Bankart bridge and labral repair. At six months follow-up, she has progressed to a full recovery with no recurrence. A search was conducted in May 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL with the search terms bony Bankart, bone Bankart, osseous Bankart, acute, bridge, suture bridge, double row. Double-row suture bridge repairs result in improvement in shoulder function as determined by ASES (93.5), QuickDASH (4.5), SANE (95.9), and SF-12 (55.6). The overall recurrence rate of anterior instability after a bony Bankart bridge repair is 8%. When examining the return to prior level of function, 81.4% of patients were able to do so with only 7.9% of patients reporting significant modifications to their activity level. In mid-term results, double row suture bridge demonstrates similar outcomes to other all-arthroscopic fixation methods of bony Bankart injuries. Importantly, bony Bankart bridge remains a viable option for critical glenoid lesions over the 20% cutoff used in other all arthroscopic techniques. Biomechanically, the double-row suture bridge offers distinct benefits over its single-row counterpart including increased compression, reduced displacement, and reduced step-off. Although there is limited data, the studies discussed and the demonstrative case show the potential benefit of all-arthroscopic double-row suture bridge fixation including increased compression, decreased displacement, and a lower complication rate in patients with large bony Bankart lesions traditionally requiring bony augmentation. However, more robust studies are necessary to determine the long-term success of the double-row suture bridge.

Semi–Bone Tunnel Technique Using Double-Row Suture Bridge Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma Hydrogel for Rotator Cuff Repair in a Rabbit Model

Background: The approach to managing the footprint area and reconstructing the tendon-bone interface (TBI) is critical for optimal healing. Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of the semi–bone tunnel (SBT) technique using a double-row suture bridge combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) hydrogel for rotator cuff repair in a rabbit model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 48 New Zealand White rabbits were divided into 4 groups. The supraspinatus tendons were severed at the footprint to create a rotator cuff tear model in the surgical groups. Rabbits were treated with the traditional onto-surface repair (control group), SBT technique (SBT group), and SBT technique combined with PRP hydrogel implantation (SBT+PRP group). The rabbits without surgery were the normal group. At 8 weeks after surgery, macroscopic observation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and micro–computed tomography (μCT) examinations, histological evaluations, and biomechanical tests were performed to assess the curative effects of the given treatments. Results: The MRI results showed that the repaired supraspinatus tendon presented a uniform signal, minimal inflammatory response, and the lowest signal-to-noise quotient value in the SBT+PRP group. The μCT results suggested that the SBT technique did not reduce the local bone mineral density in the TBI area compared with the onto-surface repair technique. The histological staining results showed that the regenerated TBI in the SBT+PRP group had a 4-layer structure similar to the natural tissue. The highest values for biomechanical properties were observed in the SBT+PRP group, and there was no significant difference between the SBT+PRP group and normal group. Conclusion: The SBT technique presented a better tendon-bone healing effect for rotator cuff tear in the rabbit model compared with the traditional onto-surface repair technique. The specimens in the SBT+PRP group had a similar TBI structure and biomechanical properties to the natural tissue. Clinical Relevance: The SBT technique can be an alternative surgical approach for rotator cuff repair, especially for moderate to large tears and cases requiring scaffold implantation.

The New Double-row Bankart Repair Recovered Shoulder Stability without Excessive Motion Limitation: A Case-Control Study with Single-row Bankart Repair.

Bankart lesion is one of the most common lesions of the glenohumeral joint. Several double-row suture methods were reported for Bankart repair, which could provide more stability, yet more motion limitation and complications. Therefore, we introduced a new double-row Bankart repair technique, key point double-row suture which used one anchor in the medial line. The purpose of this article is to investigate the clinical outcomes of this new method and to compare it with single-row suture. Seventy-eight patients receiving key point double-row suture or single-row suture from October 2010 to June 2014 were collected retrospectively. The basic information including gender, age, dominant arm, and number of episodes of instability was collected. Before surgery, the glenoid bone loss was measured from the CT scan. The visual analogue scale, American shoulder and elbow surgeons, the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder scale, and subjective shoulder value were valued before surgery and at the last follow-up. Forty-four patients (24 patients receiving single-row suture and 20 patients receiving key point double-row suture) were followed up successfully. The follow-up period was 9.2 ± 1.1 years (range, 7.8-11.4 years). At the last follow-up, no significant differences were detected for any of the clinical scores. The recurrence rate was 12.5% for the single-row group and 10% for the double-row group, respectively (p = 0.795) 14 patients (31.8%) in the single-row group and nine patients (26.5%) in the double-row group were tested for active range of motion. A statistically significant difference was found only for the internal rotation at 90° abduction (48.9° for single-row and 76.7° for key point double-row, p = 0.033). The key point double-row sutures for Bankart lesions could achieve similar long-term outcomes compared with single-row suture, and one medial anchor did not result in a limited range of motion. The low recurrence rate and previous biomechanical results also indicate the key point double-row suture is a reliable method.

УЛЬТРАСОНОГРАФИЧЕСКАЯ ОЦЕНКА ВОССТАНОВЛЕНИЯ ФУНКЦИИ МОЧЕВОГО ПУЗЫРЯ ПОСЛЕ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ «БЕСШОВНОГО» ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЦИСТОТОМНОЙ РАНЫ У КОШЕК

The purpose of reseaech is to study the features of wound scar formation with “sutureless” and traditional (double-row suture) methods of closing a cystotomy wound, as well as to identify functional deviations of the operated organ through ultrasonographic studies in the early postoperative period. The study was carried out as part of the work of the Educational and Scientific Center of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the Altai State Agrarian University. Surgical interventions and ultrasonographic studies were performed at the Department of Morphology, Surgery and Obstetrics in cats of British, Persian and outbred breeds (n = 19) admitted for clinical visits. In 8 animals, a “sutureless” connection of the edges of the surgical wound of the bladder was used, and in 11 cats, according to clinical indications, the traditional me¬thod of suturing was used. To determine the functionality of the operated bladder in the early postoperative period, all animals used in the experiment underwent ultrasound diagnostics on an HTI PU-2200 Vet apparatus with a 7Mz linear sensor. The use of an adhesive suture ensures correct reposition of the dissected layers of the bladder without entrapment of the mucous membrane, respectively, its subsequent necrobiosis, which ensures high biological tightness and rapid fusion of the edges of the surgical wound, resulting in the formation of a full-fledged elastic wound scar. The method of “sutureless” connection of the edges of a cystotomy wound cannot be used for degenerative changes in the tissues of the bladder. The use of a traditional double-row suture reduces the bladder cavity due to the massive tissue shaft that forms when the cystotomy wound is closed, leading to the formation of a massive postoperative scar and a decrease in the contractility of the operated organ. The choice of method for closing a surgical wound of the bladder depends on the morphofunctional state of the organ, the clinical status of the patient and the severity of the disease at the time of surgery.

Complications following surgical management of Haglund's triad: A retrospective, single-center analysis

BackgroundHaglund's triad consists of Haglund's deformity, insertional Achilles tendinosis, and retrocalcaneal bursitis and is most commonly managed surgically through Haglund's resection, bursectomy, and Achilles tendon detachment-reattachment using a central tendon-splitting approach stabilized with a double row suture construct. This procedure has demonstrated consistently good outcomes; however, we have anecdotally identified a higher complication rate performing this surgery compared with the published literature. Accordingly, we sought to evaluate this further. MethodsWe performed a retrospective electronic medical record review of 44 consecutive patients (10 men, 34 women) who underwent surgical correction of Haglund's triad. Patient age, gender, laterality, body mass index, follow-up duration, complications encountered, and revision surgery performed were analyzed. ResultsSignificant differences were identified for gender and incidence of complications (p = 0.01424), with women having a greater incidence of complications than men and duration of follow-up (p = 0.0432) where women endured a longer follow-up period. No other significant differences for complications were identified for age (p = 0.192), laterality (p = 0.5535), or body mass index (p = 0.9532) irrespective of gender. Complications occurred in 50 % of patients with most complications persisting at the final follow-up. ConclusionWe identified a significantly greater incidence of complications for women compared to men for operative management of Haglund's triad regardless of age, laterality, or body mass index. Further analysis of the effect gender has on operative management of Haglund's triad seems warranted so that measures to mitigate complications can be developed, especially since complications persisted for those patients who encountered them which negatively affected their outcomes. Level of EvidenceIII-Therapeutic study: Retrospective comparative analysis at a single institution CategoryRearfoot and Ankle Reconstruction

Biomechanical comparison of suture bridge rotator cuff repair with and without dermal allograft pledgets

BackgroundOne method to augment rotator cuff repair is to pass dermal allograft pledgets along the sutures that bridge from the medial to the lateral row. It remains unclear whether this augmentation method alters repair biomechanics. MethodsThis was a controlled laboratory study. After an a priori power analysis, nine pairs of rotator cuffs underwent double row suture bridge rotator cuff repair, half randomized to augmentation with dermal allograft pledgets passed along the suture bridge sutures. Repairs were then mounted on a material testing system and loaded cyclically 500 cycles to mesure applied force and displacement. Repairs then underwent ultimate failure testing and stiffness, ultimate failure force, and ultimate failure displacement were measured. Paired t-tests were performed to compare between groups. ResultsThere were no differences between groups in construct gapping with cyclic loading after 500 cycles (p = 0.885). There no differences between the augmented and control groups in yield force (103.5 ± 5.0 vs. 101.4 ± 5.9 N, respectively, p=0.183), stiffness (94.2 ± 13.9 vs. 90.9 ± 13.8, p=0.585), or ultimate failure force (255.3 ± 65.8 vs. 285.3 ± 83.2, p=0.315). There were no differences between groups in failure modes, with most specimens failing by cuff tissue tearing within or medial to the construct. ConclusionThe addition of dermal allograft pledgets does not positively or negatively influence the time-zero biomechanical characteristics of double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair.

A biomechanical comparison of the double-row suture fixation and compression screw techniques in the treatment of lateral malleolar avulsion fracture

BackgroundAvulsion fractures of fibula occur with ankle sprains. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of double-row suture versus compression screw techniques in treatment of lateral malleolar avulsion fracturelarger than 10 mm in size, which is typically not associated with an anterior talofibular ligament injury. MethodsWe simulated lateral malleolus avulsion fractures in six matched pairs of 12 human cadaveric ankles. These were then randomly divided into two groups: a double-row fixation group and a compression screw group. Biomechanical testing was performed after surgical fixation. The foot was rotated from the neutral position toward inversion at a rate of 1°/s until 12.5 N-m or structural failure was reached. The final rotation torque, rotation angle, stiffness, and displacement of the ossicles were recorded. ResultsNo significant difference was found in the final rotation torque (7.60 ± 3.70 vs 7.23 ± 2.06 N-m, p = 0.87), rotation angle (43.61 ± 14.77° vs 40.93 ± 10.94°, p = 0.56), stiffness (0.19 ± 0.08 vs 0.13 ± 0.07, p = 0.33), or displacement (6.11 ± 5.23 vs 7.09 ± 5.93 mm, p = 0.77) between the two groups. Conclusions: The stability of the double-row suture fixation was equivalent to compression screw fixation in treating a lateral malleolar avulsion fracture larger than 10 mm in size with ligament injury, as determined by our biomechanical testing.

Clinical case of treatment of complications of the use of plate dental implants on the maxilla

Relevance. According to the conclusion of the European Federation of Periodontology, late complications of dental implantation include inflammation of the tissues in the reimplantation zone after the completion of osseointegration in the form of periimplantation mucositis and reimplantitis. According to many authors, in the first two months after dental implantation, in the case of initial insufficiency of soft tissue thickness in the operation area, when a minimum volume of biological width (3 mm on average) is formed, bone tissue loss is provoked, this property is especially pronounced when using lamellar dental implants. In the maxilla, overimplantation of a massive plate implant can lead to the development of inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. The most traditional options for mucosal augmentation in the area of implantation in the maxilla are grafting with local tissues or autotransplantation of a free flap from a donor site. Also used are resorbable collagen matrices (Resorbable Collagen Matrix – RCM) or membranes that protect the underlying tissues from external influences, completely close the surgical wound, prevent pathological scarring and allow you to control the epithelialization process.The purpose of the study. To increase the effectiveness of complex treatment of complicated reimplantitis in the maxilla, sinusoethmoiditis, by sanitation and the use of a collagen membrane for the combined closure of the oro-antral fistula.Material and methods. The article is devoted to the clinical case of complications of the use of a lamellar dental implant in the maxilla, diagnosis and treatment by an interdisciplinary surgical team of the City Clinical Hospital N.I. Pirogov of the Department of Healthcare of Moscow. A staged surgical intervention for the removal of a detailed laminar implant, unilateral ethmoidotomy and maxillary sinusectomy, and combined closure of the oro-antral communication with the use of local tissue plasty with a flap from the cheek and the installation of a collagen membrane are described.Results. To close a large bone defect in the area of the alveolar part of the maxilla, the bioPLATE Contur membrane was used, which is characterized by increased extensibility up to 50% of the original dimensions and elasticity. The mucoperiosteal flap was laid without tension over the collagen membrane and fixed with two-row interrupted sutures. The sutures were removed on the 14th postoperative day, the wound was epithelialized throughout, without signs of inflammation.Conclusions. Complications of dental implantation in the maxilla are manifested in the form of a loss of bone volume and a defect in the alveolar margin of the maxilla, the development of inflammatory complications of adjacent tissues and anatomical structures. This requires a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosis and surgical treatment with a comprehensive planning of patient rehabilitation. The use of a combined method of closing a bone defect with a collagen resorbable membrane and a buccal mucoperiosteal flap with suturing with a double-row suture makes it possible to achieve a satisfactory course of the postoperative period, avoid recurrence of the oro-antral fistula, and prepare the patient for further dental rehabilitation.

Rip-Stop Fixation Constructs for Rotator Cuff Repair

In arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, poor tendon quality, medially based tears, lateral tendon loss, or limited tendon mobility can all preclude the use of double-row suture constructs, presenting a challenge in achieving secure fixation and tendon-to-bone healing. Rip-stop suture configurations can be used in these settings to improve resistance to tissue cutout and provide enhanced biomechanical characteristics compared with standard single-row repairs. The load-sharing rip-stop technique uses 2 double-loaded medial suture anchors, which are placed adjacent to the articular margin, and 1 rip-stop suture tape, which is independently secured to bone with 2 lateral knotless anchors. The load-sharing rip-stop technique has been shown to improve ultimate load to failure by 1.7 times compared with a single-row repair. Clinically, this technique has been associated with a 53% healing rate of large and massive rotator cuff tears, compared with only 11% healing when using single-row repair. A completely knotless variation rip-stop configuration also has been described and shown to be biomechanically equivalent to a single-row repair with triple-loaded anchors. For surgeons desiring a single-row repair only, the knotless rip-stop therefore presents an advantage by eliminating the need for knot-tying and decreasing operative time.

Arthroscopic Stabilization of Osteochondral Fracture of the Anterior-Inferior Glenoid Using Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique

Osteochondral fracture of the glenoid can be caused by traumatic damage in the shoulder, and addressing this injury can be challenging due to the complexity of the condition and the various treatment options. Left untreated, this injury can lead to post-traumatic arthritis and shoulder instability. There have been different surgical techniques for addressing osteochondral fracture, including open and arthroscopic methods, such as debridement, screw fixation, and bone graft, but there is a lack of a universally accepted treatment guidelines. In this technical note, the authors introduce a simple stabilization method for an osteochondral fracture of anterior-inferior glenoid using double-row suture bridge technique through trans-subscapularis portal created by an “inside-out” technique.

Arthroscopic transosseous anchorless rotator cuff repair reduces bone defects related to peri-implant cyst formation: a comparison with conventional suture anchors using propensity score matching.

The transosseous anchorless repair (ToR) technique was recently introduced to avoid suture anchor-related problems. While favorable outcomes of the ToR technique have been reported, no previous studies on peri-implant cyst formation with the ToR technique exist. Therefore, this study compared the clinical outcomes and prevalence of peri-implant cyst formation between the ToR technique and the conventional transosseous equivalent technique using suture anchors (SA). Cases with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) between 2016 and 2018 treated with the double-row suture bridge technique were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into ToR and SA groups. To compare clinical outcomes, 19 ToR and 57 SA cases without intraoperative implant failure were selected using propensity score matching (PSM). While intraoperative implant failure rate was analyzed before PSM, retear rate, peri-implant cyst formation rate, and functional outcomes were compared after PSM. The intraoperative implant failure rate (ToR, 8% vs. SA, 15.3%) and retear rate (ToR, 5.3% vs. SA, 19.3%) did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05). However, peri-implant cysts were not observed in the ToR group, while they were observed in 16.7% of the SA group (P=0.008). Postoperative functional outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). The ToR technique produced comparable clinical outcomes to conventional techniques. Considering the possibility of additional surgeries, the absence of peri-implant cyst formation might be an advantage of ToR. Furthermore, ToR might reduce the medical costs related to suture anchors and, thereby, could be a useful option for ARCR.

Outcomes of Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Novel All-Suture Soft Anchor Medial Row.

Few studies have examined the short-term clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) with all-suture anchors for medial row anchor fixation. To evaluate clinical outcomes of double-row suture bridge RCR using a novel all-suture medial row anchor. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. We enrolled 179 patients before double-row suture bridge RCR (mean age at surgery, 60.0 years; 63% male patients) at a single institution. All patients underwent RCR with all-suture anchor fixation for the medial row and solid anchor fixation for the lateral row. Preoperative (baseline) and follow-up (minimum follow-up time of 2 years; mean, 2.5 years) clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and a 10-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). We calculated the proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the ASES (≥78.0) and NPRS (≤1.7). We further compared baseline and follow-up outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds using paired t tests and McNemar tests, respectively, and calculated effect size to quantify the magnitude of change from baseline to follow-up. Values significantly improved from baseline to follow-up for ASES (from 45.3 ± 19.8 to 87.3 ± 17.1) and NPRS (from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 1.4 ± 2.1). The proportion of patients meeting PASS thresholds also significantly improved for the ASES (from 6% to 77%) and the NPRS (from 7% to 72%). The magnitude of baseline to follow-up change for all measures was large (all effect sizes ≥1.5). Our study demonstrated excellent short-term clinical outcomes and substantial improvements for patients undergoing double-row suture bridge RCR with all-suture anchors for medial row fixation.