Double-row Rotator Cuff Repair Research Articles

All-arthroscopic versus mini-open double row rotator cuff repair – A prospective randomised control study based on functional and radiological outcomes

PurposeIn an era where arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is dominant in the United States (77.9 % preference) compared to open surgery (53.33 %), a shift towards minimally invasive All-Arthroscopic (AA) techniques over classical Mini-Open (MO) repair is emerging. This study explores current trends in shoulder procedures in India and compares functional outcomes and radiological repair integrity between AA and MO techniques, which are understudied in the Indian context. MethodologyIn this prospective study, 60 patients (30 in the AA group and 30 in the MO group) with rotator cuff tears underwent assessment. Pre/post-operative clinical evaluations and 12-month follow-ups using UCLA and Oxford Shoulder Score, along with preoperative MRI and postoperative USG, were conducted. ResultsAt one-year follow-up, the AA group showed better functional outcomes (53.3 % excellent/good vs. 30.0 % in MO). No significant radiological differences (Sugaya grading) were found. Tear size was comparable with no association with functional/radiological outcomes. ConclusionThe AA group demonstrated favourable functional outcomes, matched to MO group findings, which is in accordance with global studies. Despite higher costs, the increasing popularity of AA in India is justified by enhanced results and reduced postoperative discomfort.

Short-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without augmentation with an interpositional nanofiber scaffold

Background The rate of retear after primary rotator cuff failure remains unacceptably high (up to 36% for small- to medium-sized tears). Augmentation of the repair with an interpositional scaffold has been reported to improve healing. Purpose To compare the short-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without augmentation with an interpositional nanofiber scaffold. Methods We prospectively enrolled patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears into a multicenter study with institutional review board approval. All patients had a minimum of one year clinical and radiographic follow-up. A single fellowship trained shoulder surgeon performed all procedures. Patients were blinded and randomized at the time of surgery into either a treatment group consisting of double row rotator cuff repair augmented with an interpositional nanofiber scaffold or a control group in which a standard double-row repair without augmentation was performed. Range of motion, muscle dynamometer strength testing (Lafayette Instruments), and clinical outcomes according to visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores were assessed preoperatively and at routine follow-up intervals. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at a minimum of 4 months (range 4.5-14) on all patients and assessed according to the Sugaya classification with failure noted as grade 4 or higher. Patients without initial failure were then assessed at a minimum of one year (range 12-24 months) by ultrasound examination or MRI to assess for late failure of the repair and clinical outcomes. Results Thirty patients with a mean age of 64.6 years were statistically analyzed. Fourteen patients were treated with the nanofiber scaffold and 16 patients were non-augmented and made up the control. At an average of 6.8 months, all patients underwent MRI and early failure occurred in 7.1% of the nanofiber scaffold patients compared to 18.8% in the control group (p=.602). At an average time of 17 months postoperatively, all remaining patients with intact repairs underwent MRI (2) or ultrasound (28) and 9 more patients demonstrated Sugaya tear progression with five progressing to failure. All late failures and Sugaya tear progressions occurred in the control group. Cumulative treatment failure occurred significantly less often in patients who received the nanofiber scaffold (7.1%) compared to those who did not receive the bioresorbable scaffold (50%) (p=.017). Conclusion The present prospective study demonstrates a statistically significant difference in rotator cuff healing with use of an interpositional nanofiber scaffold. While future studies and larger series are warranted, the current data is promising in further advancing the outcomes of rotator cuff repairs.

Novel all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis technique incorporated into rotator cuff repair—two hundred cases with minimum 2-year follow-up

Biceps tendon pathology is a common source of pain in the shoulder. It is frequently seen in conjunction with symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Biceps tendon management during arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs can be achieved via tenodesis with various techniques or tenotomy. Tenodesis of the biceps generally results in less deformity and reduced exertion-related cramping. However, most techniques require the addition of some type of hardware to provide fixation for the biceps tendon, which adds cost, time, and complexity. This study presents a technique for an all-arthroscopic bicep tenodesis performed in conjunction with a double-row rotator cuff repair, requiring no additional hardware. This study is a retrospective review of data that were prospectively collected for 200 consecutive patients for whom the procedure was performed. Patients were seen postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 4 months, and 6 months and in addition massive rotator cuff repairs were seen at 8 months. Additionally all patients were contacted at a minimum 2-year follow-up to access for the presence deformity, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and SANE score. Descriptive statistics and comparisons to known minimal clinical important differences (MCIDs) for the patient recorded outcome measures were recorded. Two hundred patients were included in the study and 152 responded to the telephone interviews. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 65.3 year old (standard deviation ± 9.1, range of 46-84), and the mean postoperative phone interview was 3.2 years postsurgery (standard deviation of ± 1.0, range of 2-5 years). The average ASES score improved from 52.6 to 94.6, which is 3 times greater than the minimal clinical important difference. The average postoperative SANE score was 94. Seven procedures out of the 200 were labeled as failures due to 1 patient's nonsatisfaction with the procedure and 3 for a Popeye deformity and 3 that had a revision RCR. The described method of an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis performed with a rotator cuff repair uses no extra hardware, requires minimal additional operative time, and is clinically effective. At a minimum 2-year follow-up, the all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in conjunction with a double-row rotator cuff repair resulted in a marked improvement in their ASES score with a 3.5% failure rate. The all-arthroscopic bicep tenodesis performed in conjunction with a double-row rotator cuff repair demonstrated improved clinical outcome, without requiring any additional hardware to tenodese the biceps, at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Outcomes of Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Novel All-Suture Soft Anchor Medial Row.

Few studies have examined the short-term clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) with all-suture anchors for medial row anchor fixation. To evaluate clinical outcomes of double-row suture bridge RCR using a novel all-suture medial row anchor. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. We enrolled 179 patients before double-row suture bridge RCR (mean age at surgery, 60.0 years; 63% male patients) at a single institution. All patients underwent RCR with all-suture anchor fixation for the medial row and solid anchor fixation for the lateral row. Preoperative (baseline) and follow-up (minimum follow-up time of 2 years; mean, 2.5 years) clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and a 10-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). We calculated the proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the ASES (≥78.0) and NPRS (≤1.7). We further compared baseline and follow-up outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds using paired t tests and McNemar tests, respectively, and calculated effect size to quantify the magnitude of change from baseline to follow-up. Values significantly improved from baseline to follow-up for ASES (from 45.3 ± 19.8 to 87.3 ± 17.1) and NPRS (from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 1.4 ± 2.1). The proportion of patients meeting PASS thresholds also significantly improved for the ASES (from 6% to 77%) and the NPRS (from 7% to 72%). The magnitude of baseline to follow-up change for all measures was large (all effect sizes ≥1.5). Our study demonstrated excellent short-term clinical outcomes and substantial improvements for patients undergoing double-row suture bridge RCR with all-suture anchors for medial row fixation.

Rotator Cuff Repair with Knotless All-Suture Medial Row Anchors and Biceps Autograft Augmentation

Incomplete healing and/or functional failure following rotator cuff tear repair remains a challenging problem for both patients and surgeons. Augmentation strategies are growing to increase healing through biologic and mechanical mechanisms to improve functional results after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The majority of currently described augmentation techniques use allograft tissue. An alternative, low-cost, autograft option for augmentation is the use of the long head of biceps tendon autograft as a free functional graft. Here, we describe the use of autograft biceps tendon as a viable option for augmentation of double-row rotator cuff repair with knotless all-suture suture anchors.

Clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with subacromial bursa reimplantation: a retrospective cohort study

The subacromial bursa has been found to be a rich, local, source of mesenchymal stem cells but is removed for visualization during rotator cuff repair. Reimplantation of this tissue may improve rotator cuff healing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with and without subacromial bursa reimplantation. Patients aged 37-77 with a full-thickness or near full-thickness supraspinatus tears underwent arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent double row rotator cuff repair. In patients prior to July 2019, the subacromial bursa was resected for visualization, and discarded. In patients after July 2019, the subacromial bursa was collected using a filtration device connected to an arthroscopic shaver and reapplied to the bursal surface of the tendon at the completion of the rotator cuff repair. Rotator cuff integrity was evaluated via magnetic resonance imaging on bursa patients at 6 months postoperatively. Minimum 18-month clinical outcomes (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, patient satisfaction) were compared between bursa and nonbursa cohorts. A total of 136 patients were included in the study (control n=110, bursa n=26). Preoperative demographics and tear characteristics were not different between groups. Average follow-up was significantly longer in the control group (control: 3.2±0.7 years; bursa: 1.8±0.3 years; P<.001). The control group showed a significantly higher Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (control: 87.9±15.8, bursa: 83.6±15.1, P=.037) that did not meet minimum clinically important difference. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and patient satisfaction scores were similar between the groups. Symptomatic retears were not significantly different between groups (control: 9.1%, bursa 7.7%, P=.86). Seven patients in the control group underwent reoperation (6.4%), compared to 0 patients in the bursa group (0%, P=.2). Six-month postoperative magnetic resonance images obtained on bursa patients demonstrated 85% rotator cuff continuity (n=17/20) as defined via Sugaya classification. Augmentation of rotator cuff repair with bursal tissue does not appear to have negative effects, and given the accessibility and ease of harvest of this tissue, further research should be performed to evaluate its potential for improved tendon healing or clinical outcomes.

Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair With Box Configuration

Background: Arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent (TOE) techniques may offer additional advantages, including a more efficient surgery with a self-reinforcing construct with equivalent clinical results to medial knotted TOE repair for rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Indications: An arthroscopic knotless double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) using FiberTak RC anchors for medial row fixation with box configuration may be an appropriate construct for operatively indicated small-to-moderate full-thickness RCTs. Technique: Our modified technique uses TOE repair principles to address RCTs too small for traditional 4.75-mm anchors using medial row fixation and too large to apply a single medial to lateral anchor repair. The patient is placed in a beach chair position. In addition to standard anterior and posterior portals, a lower lateral working portal and a higher posterolateral viewing portal are made. Subsequent to supraspinatus footprint visualization/preparation, two 2.6-mm FiberTak RC anchors each loaded with 1 LabralTape and 1 FiberWire are placed medially. The 4 sets of sutures for one anchor are placed through the rotator cuff tendon together in 1 spot and the process is repeated for the second anchor. One FiberWire from each anchor is then tied extracorporeally and then a double pulley technique is used to compress the medial aspect of the repair at the footprint in a box configuration. Finally, 1 limb of LabralTape from each of the medial anchors along with the corresponding FiberWire is secured through 2 lateral-row 4.75-mm anchors anteriorly and posteriorly to restore the lateral footprint and secure the rotator cuff in TOE box configuration. This modified technique can provide anatomical compression of the rotator cuff tendon at the footprint with additional medial compression achieved by the box configuration while taking advantage of knotless fixation. Results: Postoperatively, a sling is worn for 4 weeks, passive range of motion (ROM) is initiated at 2 weeks, active ROM is begun at 6 weeks, and strengthening at 3 months. Patients may return to full unrestricted activities around 5 to 6 months. Discussion/Conclusion: A modified arthroscopic DR RCR with box configuration is an excellent treatment option for patients with small-to-moderate full-thickness RCT who fail conservative treatment. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Does arthroscopic knotless double-row rotator cuff repair yield better patient-reported outcome measures than knotted double-row repair? A prospective comparative interventional study

Does arthroscopic knotless double-row rotator cuff repair yield better patient-reported outcome measures than knotted double-row repair? A prospective comparative interventional study

Rates of medial and lateral row failure and risk factors for Re-tear in arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair

A common postoperative complication after rotator cuff repair is re-tear requiring a secondary procedure. Double row and trans-osseous equivalent repair techniques have become increasingly popular in recent years, however repair failure remains a relatively common complication after primary rotator cuff repair. A retrospective observational study of 389 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair from February 1, 2014 to March 31, 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities, and tear characteristics between patients who experienced re-tear and those who did not. Repair failures were confirmed by plain MRI or intraoperatively during repeat surgical treatment. A subgroup analysis of patients who experienced re-tear due to medial row failure was conducted. The overall re-tear rate was 8.2% (32 patients). Six patients (1.5%) experienced medial row failure, while 26 patients (6.7%) experienced lateral row failure. The average time to re-tear was 279.3 ± 291.2 days. On multivariate analysis, patients with Goutallier Classification ≥3 (OR: 4.274, p = 0.046) and 3 anchor repair (OR: 5.387, p = 0.027) were at significantly increased risk for any re-tear after controlling for other tear characteristics. No statistically significant independent risk factors for medial row failure were identified after controlling for confounding variables. Goutallier classification greater than 3 and a primary repair with 3 anchors are significant risk factors for re-tear after double row rotator cuff repair, however they are not associated with increased occurrence of medial row failure. Further evaluation of risk factors for medial row failure is required to avoid this rare but serious re-tear pattern.

Is biceps tenodesis necessary when performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients older than 55 years?

In patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, tenotomy and tenodesis are the most performed surgical procedures for the biceps long head (BLH) pathologies. Controversy continues as to which surgical procedure provides better results. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of tenotomy and tenodesis applied to the biceps long head in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In our study, the clinical results of 706 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with tenotomy or tenodesis on the long biceps head were evaluated retrospectively. Rotator cuff repair patients were divided into two groups as single-row and double-row repair patients. The clinical results of patients who underwent tenotomy and tenodesis in single-row (n = 383) and double-row (n = 323) repair groups were compared. The clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent tenotomy and tenodesis without distinction between double/single-row repair were also compared. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations of the patients were made with Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and visual pain scale (VAS). The presence of the Popeye sign in the arm, tenderness in the bicipital groove, and cramping in the biceps muscle in the postoperative period was evaluated and compared among groups. Preoperative and postoperative clinical results of the patients were compared within the groups. A total of 706 patients with a mean age of 61.78 ± 20.94years and a mean follow-up period of 29.15 ± 14.28months were evaluated. The mean age of the tenodesis group (58.13 ± 8.47) was significantly lower than the tenotomy group (61.52 ± 22.58) (p < 0.05). The mean CSS and VAS mean postoperatively in the tenotomy group (n = 587) were 76.84 ± 12.74 and 2.29 ± 2.78. The postoperative mean CSS and VAS in the tenodesis group (n = 119) were 77.56 ± 11.23 and 2.64 ± 2.70. There was no statistically significant difference between the postoperative clinical scores of patients who underwent tenotomy and patients who underwent tenodesis (p > 0.05). There was no difference between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups regarding Popeye deformity (p = 0.980). Bicipital groove tenderness and cramping in the biceps muscle were significantly higher in the tenodesis group (p < 0.001, < 0.001). Tenodesis was performed in 68, and tenotomy was performed in 315 out of 383 patients who underwent single-row rotator cuff repair. Tenodesis was performed in 51, and tenotomy was performed in 272 of 334 patients who underwent double-row rotator cuff repair. When singe versus double-row groups was compared, there was no significant difference in VAS, CSS, Popeye sing, bicipital groove tenderness, or biceps muscle cramping. When tenotomy versus tenodesis was compared within single- and double-row repair groups, there was no significant difference in VAS or CSS. There was no difference between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups regarding Popeye deformity, but bicipital groove tenderness and muscle cramping were more in tenodesis groups regardless of the repair rows. The effect of tenodesis versus tenotomy for BHL pathologies in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was not significant for clinical scores, but bicipital groove tenderness and biceps muscle cramping were significantly higher in the tenodesis group.

Statistical Fragility of Single-Row Versus Double-Row Anchoring for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.

Background:Comparative studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often use the P (probability) value to convey the statistical significance of their findings. P values are an imperfect measure, however, and are vulnerable to a small number of outcome reversals to alter statistical significance. The inclusion of a fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) may aid in the interpretation of a study’s statistical strength.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to examine the statistical stability of studies comparing single-row to double-row rotator cuff repair. It was hypothesized that the findings of these studies would be vulnerable to a small number of outcome event reversals, often fewer than the number of patients lost to follow-up.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:We analyzed comparative studies and RCTs on primary single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair that were published between 2000 and 2021 in 10 leading orthopaedic journals. Statistical significance was defined as a P < .05. The FI for each outcome was determined by the number of event reversals necessary to alter significance. The FQ was calculated by dividing the FI by the respective sample size.Results:Of 4896 studies screened, 22 comparative studies, 10 of which were RCTs, were ultimately included for analysis. A total of 74 outcomes were examined. Overall, the median FI was 2 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-3), and the median FQ was 0.035 (IQR, 0.020-0.057). The mean FI was 2.55 ± 1.29, and the mean FQ was 0.043 ± 0.027. In 64% of outcomes, the FI was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up.) Additionally, 81% of significant outcomes needed just a single outcome reversal to lose their significance.Conclusion:Over half of the studies currently used to guide clinical practice have a number of patients lost to follow-up greater than their FI. The results of these studies should be interpreted within the context of these limitations. Future analyses may benefit from the inclusion of the FI and the FQ in their statistical analyses.

Knotted Versus Knotless Medial-Row Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs Have Similar Clinical and Functional Outcomes

PurposeTo retrospectively investigate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent knotted medial-row rotator cuff repair (KT-RCR) compared with patients who underwent knotless medial-row rotator cuff repair (KL-RCR).MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients who underwent double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair in 2016 was performed at a single institution with 2-year follow-up. Information regarding demographic characteristics, preoperative tear size (magnetic resonance imaging), surgical variables (including method of suture stabilization), preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and all complications (e.g., cuff failure, adhesive capsulitis, and persistent pain) was compiled.ResultsA total of 189 patients met the inclusion criteria: 72 in the KL-RCR group and 117 in the KT-RCR group. No significant difference in preoperative ASES scores was found between the KL-RCR and KT-RCR groups (48.3 vs 45.4, P = .327). Postoperative ASES scores did not differ between the groups (82.4 for KL-RCR vs 78.8 for KT-RCR, P = .579). We found no significant difference in cuff failure rates after 2 years, determined by magnetic resonance imaging (5.6% for KL-RCR vs 6.1% for KT-RCR, P > .999), or complication rates (11.1% for KL-RCR vs 8.6% for KT-RCR, P = .743).ConclusionsThe knotted approach and knotless approach to double-row rotator cuff repair showed similar outcome scores, cuff failure rates, and complication rates at minimum 2-year follow-up.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective therapeutic comparative trial.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Is healing enough?

Hypothesis/backgroundArthroscopic rotator cuff repair most commonly results in good clinical outcomes, however understanding of predictive factors influencing the final clinical outcome is limited. AimThe purpose of our study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with healed supraspinatus tendon after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and to identify its pre- and peri-operative predictive factors of good clinical results. MethodsA multi-center prospective study followed up 188 patients, who had a healed tendon after an arthroscopic repair of isolated supraspinatus tear. Inclusion criteria were: age under 70 years old, isolated supraspinatus tear, stage 0 or I of fatty infiltration, healed supraspinatus tendon at one year postoperatively and the same arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair used in all patients. Clinical assessment used Constant Murley Score (CMS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Ultrasound (US) control checked tendon repair quality based on Sugaya classification. Types I-II-III were considered as healed. ResultsThe average age of our cohort was 57.57 (range; 41 to 70) years and the female to male ratio was 1.14 (range; 100 to 87). The average preoperative CMS was 53.75±13.50 (mean±SD; range; 16 to 83). At final follow up, the average postoperative CMS was 79.95±12.05 (mean±SD; range; 28 to 100). 12.22% (23/188) of patients, who had a CMS score below 70, had a clinically significant difference compared to the average CMS, due to the fact that the minimal clinically significant difference (MCID) in CMS is 10. A statistical analysis has shown that in patients with lower scores there was only a significant dominance of females (p-value=0.001). No difference was found in regards to age, preoperative CMS, fatty degeneration and other factors. ConclusionOur study showed that despite all patients had a healed repair of supraspinatus, not all of them experienced a good final clinical outcome. The only factor negatively influencing the final clinical outcome was a female gender. No other structural factors seemed to influence the final clinical results. Futures studies should focus more on analyzing which personality traits and other psychosocial factors play an important role in determining the final outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Level of evidenceIII; retrospective cohort study.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repairs Using All-Suture Anchors as Medial Row Anchors.

The aim of our study is to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of prospectively enrolled patients who have had double-row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repairs, where all-suture anchors were used as medial-row anchors, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Twenty-two consecutive patients underwent arthroscopic transosseous equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors as medial-row anchors. Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant Score and Visual Analogue Scale pain score, together with shoulder range of motion, were used preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months and final follow-up. Radiological evaluation was performed with magnetic resonance imaging at one-year post surgery to assess the structural integrity of the repair and the rate of cyst formation in greater tuberosity. The patient mean age was 61 years (range 46-75). Minimum follow-up was 1 year, and the mean final follow-up was 15 months (range 12-24). Healing failure in our patients was less than 5% (1/22 patients). There were significant improvements in shoulder function outcome scores at final follow-up. The Constant and Oxford scores were 78 and 44 at final follow-up respectively. There were similar magnitudes of improvement in range of motion (combined abduction and rotation), pain score and supraspinatus strength at final follow up. The improvements in outcome scores were already statistically significant at 3 months (P<.001). Using Kim's classification for cyst formation on T2-weighted MRI images, we observed no fluid or minimal fluid collection in 85% of the patients (17/22 patients). There were no correlations between the grade of bone changes and the clinical outcomes. It is safe to use all-suture anchors as medial-row anchors when performing double-row anchor transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repairs. The purported advantages of all-suture anchors may outweigh their perceived disadvantages in rotator cuff repair surgery.

Suture Slippage After Arthroscopic Cuff Repair: Medial Displacement of Suture Knots on Follow-up Ultrasonography

Background:Compared with the single-row technique, the double-row rotator cuff repair technique is known to have a higher load to failure and a lower frequency of gap formation, leading to a lower retear rate. There are some patients with poor clinical outcomes or poor muscle strength without radiologic retear.Purpose/Hypothesis:To assess the postoperative position of suture knots via serial ultrasonography in patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture-bridge technique. Our hypothesis was that the suture would pull out of the lateral anchor (suture slippage), changing the positions of the medial suture knots during healing.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:This study included 53 patients (55 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic suture-bridge repair and were evaluated for a minimum of 24 months. On serial ultrasonography, a straight line was drawn between the top of the greater tuberosity and the medial cortex of the anchor hole. The distances between the knots of the medial rows and the perpendicular line through the center of the anchor hole were measured in longitudinal plane images of the supraspinatus. Follow-up ultrasonography was performed at 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively as well as at the final visit. The visual analog scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Constant score, and the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score were recorded preoperatively and on the final follow-up.Results:Of the 55 shoulders, 6 developed retears at repaired sites. The mean follow-up duration was 37.5 months (range, 24-65 months). Slippage distance increased significantly over time (P < .001). The slippage at the final visit did not differ between patients with retear and no retear (13.4 mm for retear group; 10.6 mm for no retear group [P = .096]).Conclusion:Suture knots of the medial row migrated medially via a suture pullout from the lateral row anchor of suture-bridge technique. Suture slippage distance did not differ significantly between retear and no retear groups.

Comparing the Predictors of Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Modified Frailty Index, Clinical Frailty Scale, and Charlson Comorbidity Index

Background:The incidence of rotator cuff tears increases with age, and operative management is usually required in patients with persistent symptoms. Although several studies have analyzed the effect of age and comorbidities on outcomes after rotator cuff repair, no study has specifically examined the consequence of frailty.Purpose:To determine the best frailty/comorbidity index for predicting functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of 340 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between April 2016 and April 2018. All patients had undergone arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with subacromial decompression by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon. Patient frailty was measured using the Modified Frailty Index (MFI), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), calculated through retrospective chart review based on case notes made just before surgery; patient age and sex were also noted preoperatively. Functional outcomes using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score, and visual analog scale for pain were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.Results:The MFI was a consistent significant predictor in all functional outcome scores up to 24 months postoperatively (P < .05), unlike the CFS and CCI. Sex was also a significant predictor of postoperative OSS, CSS, and UCLA Shoulder Score, with male sex being associated with better functional outcomes. Patients with higher MFI scores had slower functional improvement postoperatively, but they eventually attained functional outcome scores comparable with those of their counterparts with lower MFI scores at 24 months postoperatively.Conclusion:The MFI was found to be a better tool for predicting postoperative function than was the CFS or CCI in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The study findings suggest that a multidimensional assessment of frailty (including both functional status and comorbidities) is important in determining functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes of Primary Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

Background: Modern rotator cuff repair techniques demonstrate favorable early and midterm outcomes, but long-term results have yet to be reported. Purpose: To determine 10-year outcomes and survivorship after arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence 4. Methods: The primary TOE rotator cuff repair procedure was performed using either a knotted suture bridge or knotless tape bridge technique on a series of patients with 1 to 3 tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus. Only patients who were 10 years postsurgery were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected pre- and postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Failure was defined as progression to revision surgery. Results: A total of 91 shoulders (56 men, 31 women) were included between October 2005 and December 2009. Mean follow-up was 11.5 years (range, 10.0-14.1 years). Of 91 shoulders, 5 (5.5%) failed and required revision surgery. Patient-reported outcomes for patients who survived were known for 80% (69/86). Outcomes scores at final follow-up were as follows: ASES, 93.1 ± 10.8; SANE, 87.5 ± 14.2; QuickDASH, 11.1 ± 13.5; and SF-12 physical component summary (PCS), 49.2 ± 10.1. There were statistically significant declines in ASES, SANE, and SF-12 PCS from the 5-year to 10-year follow-up, but none of these changes met the minimally clinically important difference threshold. Median satisfaction at final follow-up was 10 (range, 3-10). From this cohort, Kaplan-Meier survivorship demonstrated a 94.4% survival rate at a minimum of 10 years. Conclusion: Arthroscopic TOE rotator cuff repair demonstrates high patient satisfaction and low revision rates at a mean follow-up of 11.5 years. This information may be directly utilized in surgical decision making and preoperative patient counseling regarding the longevity of modern double-row rotator cuff repair.

Protocol for a Retrospective Comparative Study to Determine the Effect of Two Different Biocomposite Suture Anchors on the Occurrence of Bony Ingrowth and Implant Reabsorption Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Introduction:Surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears commonly entails reattachment of the ruptured tendon to its bony insertion using suture anchors. Suture anchor design has evolved from solid metal anchors to vented biocomposite anchors with potentially biologic consequences. Few studies have investigated the differences between different modern anchor design and materials, making it difficult to justify their use or cost.Objective:To compare the rate of bony ingrowth and implant resorption between a coil-type open-architecture biocomposite suture anchor and a vented screw-type biocomposite suture anchor, used for arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair.Methods and analysis:In this retrospective comparative study, a consecutive series of patients who undergo a double row rotator cuff repair using a coil-type open architecture biocomposite suture anchor in the medial row and a vented screw-type biocomposite suture anchor in the lateral row will be included. A sample size calculation demonstrated that 16 participants are required in each group. Primary outcome measures will be bony ingrowth and reabsorption of the suture anchor as measured on computed tomography (CT). Secondary outcomes will include patient reported outcome measures (The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff questionnaire), range of motion, postoperative tendon integrity, and cyst formation.HighlightsOpen-architecture suture anchors facilitate the release of marrow constituents.The rate of bony ingrowth for coil- and screw-type anchors will be assessed.The difference in functional outcome between the two anchors will be assessed.

Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Enhanced With Platelet-Rich Therapy Reduces Retear Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PurposeTo assess retear rates in arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair (double-row RCR) with and without platelet-rich therapy (PRT). MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for RCTs involving use of PRT exclusively in arthroscopic double-row RCR. A random-effects model and the generic inverse variance method were used for quantitative data synthesis. Heterogeneity was tested with the I2 statistic index. ResultsThe 9 RCTs included in the meta-analysis demonstrated a risk reduction of 49% for retears in patients receiving PRT (risk ratio [RR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35 to 0.76; P = .0008; I2 = 0%). Divided by tear sizes, retear risk reduction of 47% (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.95; P = .03; I2 = 0%) was found in small to medium tears and 51% (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.84; P = .009; I2 = 0%) in large to massive tears. Linked double-row RCR resulted in risk reduction of 51% for retears in comparison with nonlinked repairs. ConclusionDouble-row RCR plus PRT significantly reduced retear rates in all sizes of rotator cuff tears. Linked double-row RCR and applying the PRT during the surgical procedure and in the tendon–bone interface reproduced the best outcomes. Clinically, all patients improved, and no statistically significant difference was seen in clinical and functional scores between the intervention groups. All patients achieved optimal values for patient-reported outcomes measures. Level of EvidenceI, systematic review and meta-analysis of level I studies.

Increased preoperative greater tuberosity angle does not affect patient-reported outcomes postarthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BackgroundThe greater tuberosity angle (GTA) is a newly described radiological parameter identified in a 2018 study by Cunningham et al that sought to investigate the effect of GT morphology on cuff tears. Increased GTA has been conceptualized to affect rotator cuff pathology through both extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms. GTA > 70° was highly predictive of a degenerative rotator cuff tear. This study seeks to examine if increased GTA predicts for worse functional outcomes 2 years postoperatively after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.MethodsBetween May 2010 and December 2016, 169 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with subacromial decompression were included in this study. GTA was measured on preoperative radiographs. These patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Outcomes were assessed with the Visual Analog Scale Pain score, Constant Shoulder Score, and the Oxford Shoulder Score. Power analysis was performed based on the minimal clinically important difference of the Constant Shoulder Score. Statistical analysis was performed by dividing patients into two groups based on GTA: 1) ≤ 70 (control GTA); and 2) >70 (increased GTA) and comparisons were made between the 2 groups.ResultsThe patients’ demographics were comparable between both groups. All 169 patients had statistically significant improvements in all functional scores at 2 years postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients in Visual Analog Scale and functional scores at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 year postoperatively. The changes in functional scores from their preoperative baseline were also tabulated, and there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Finally, there was no significant correlation between GTA with CSS or Oxford Shoulder Score at 2 years follow-up.ConclusionThis study represents the largest single series available investigating the influence of GTA on midterm functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Although GTA remains a reliable radiographic predictor of rotator cuff tears, the authors conclude that increased GTA does not negatively influence midterm functional outcomes. As there is also no statistical significance between increased GTA vs. control in relative functional gain 2 years postoperatively, corrective tuberoplasty may not be mandatory during arthroscopic repair of cuff tears. Standard arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with subacromial decompression can still be offered as a suitable treatment option.