Double-pigtail Plastic Stents Research Articles

What We Know So Far About ECG for Pancreatic Pseudocysts

Background: Endoscopic cysto-gastrostomy (ECG) has become the treatment of choice for pancreatic pseudocysts (PPCs). Endoscopic drainage of PPCs requires the creation of an anastomosis between the lumen of the PPCs and the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract. Various types of stents are used for this purpose. The aim of the study is to compare the indications, quantity, and results of using double pigtail plastic stents (DPPSs) and lumen-apposing fully covered metal stents (LAMSs) in ECG. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 39 patients (24 men, 15 women) treated for PPCs in the Department of Digestive Tract Surgery and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology between October 2018 and February 2023. The mean age of patients was 51.13 (28–77). Data about etiology, cyst diameter, type, and complications of the stents were collected. Results: DPPSs were placed in smaller cysts (108 vs. 140 millimeters, p = 0.04) and were maintained for a longer duration compared to LAMSs (106 vs. 34 days, p = 0.001). Cyst recurrence was reported less frequently in patients with a LAMS (0 (0%) vs. 4 (19.05%), p = 0.05) and the therapeutic success was non-significantly higher in the LAMS group compared to the DPPS group (100% vs. 85.71%), p = 0.095. Conclusions: Both DPPSs and LAMSs are characterized by high therapeutic success and low complication rates in patients undergoing ECG for PPCs.

A novel puzzle ring replacement technique of a lumen-apposing metal stent with a double-pigtail plastic stent to prevent walled-off necrosis recurrence (with video).

Replacing a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) with a double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) after treatment for walled-off necrosis contributes to the prevention of recurrence. However, the success rate is not very high. To overcome this issue, we devised a novel stent-replacement technique. In the final treatment procedure, a 7-F DPS was placed in the lumen of the LAMS. Subsequently, the walled-off necrosisshrank, and granulation formed over the pigtail portion, which fixed the DPS. The LAMS alone was removed with grasping forceps, leaving the DPS in the lumen of the LAMS (i.e., a puzzle-ring technique; direct or rotary removal technique). Between August 2021 and August 2023, 18 patients were evaluated for recurrence prevention using this novel technique (median duration of LAMS placement, 37 days). In 17 patients (94.4%), the LAMS was successfully replaced with a 7-F DPS (direct technique 14, rotary technique 3; median removal procedure time, 3 min). No recurrence was observed during the median observation period of 385 days. Before using this technique (April 2012 to August 2022), the technical success rate of replacement of LAMS with 7-F DPS was significantly lower (61.8% [42/68, p = 0.02]). Recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection occurred in 15.3% (4/26) of the patients who could not undergo replacement with a 7-F DPS. The novel puzzle ring technique, which improves the success rate of LAMS for DPS replacement, may be useful in reducing recurrence after walled-off necrosistreatment.

Optimizing EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy with lumen-apposing metal stents for primary drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction (SCORPION-IIp): a prospective pilot study

Background and AimsBiliary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) in patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction (MBO) is frequently associated with complications, such as pancreatitis, hampering patient outcome. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a promising alternative in patients with MBO but is associated with a worrisome risk of stent dysfunction. Placement of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) through the LAMS, thereby changing the axis of biliary drainage towards the descending duodenum, may decrease the risk of stent dysfunction while maintaining high technical success and low adverse event rates. MethodsProspective single center pilot study in patients with a pathology confirmed MBO without gastric-outlet obstruction. Primary outcome was stent dysfunction, defined as recurrent jaundice after initial clinical success, ongoing jaundice in combination with persistent bile duct dilatation, or cholangitis. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (registry number NCT05595122). ResultsOverall, 27 consecutive patients eligible for EUS-CDS were enrolled. The placement of a LAMS was successful in 24/27 patients (89%), and placement of FCSEMS through the LAMS was successful in 20/24 (83%), in the remaining 4 patients a coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent was placed. In 2 of these 20 patients there was persistent jaundice requiring stent revision (10%), leading to a clinical success rate of 90%. No patients developed stent dysfunction after initial clinical success. ConclusionsThis study showed a stent dysfunction rate of 10% following technically successful EUS-CDS with placement of a FCSEMS through the LAMS. Improving the design of LAMS may further reduce the rate of stent dysfunction.

S148 The Utility of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Combined With Coaxial Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections

S148 The Utility of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents Combined With Coaxial Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections

S1577 Are Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents Beneficial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gallbladder Drainage with Lumen Apposing Metal Stents?

S1577 Are Double-Pigtail Plastic Stents Beneficial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gallbladder Drainage with Lumen Apposing Metal Stents?

Coaxial plastic stent placement within lumen-apposing metal stents for the management of pancreatic fluid collections: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs). Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480). Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.

The role of MRCP for preventing pancreatic fluid collection recurrence after EUS-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) may recur after initial successful endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON), most commonly due to disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS). The primary aim of this study was to assess the role of MRCP for identifying DPDS to guide appropriate management and prevent PFC recurrence. Patients with WON undergoing lumen-apposing metal stent drainage of a PFC were retrospectively identified and categorized as those with MRCP versus those without MRCP before removal of transmural stents. Data on patient demographic characteristics, procedural details, cross-sectional imaging, and recurrence rates were collected through chart review. A total of 121 patients with WON were identified, of whom 44 (36.4%) had an MRCP before transmural stent removal. In patients without MRCP, 13 (16.8%) of 77 had PFC recurrence versus 0 of 44 (0%; P= .003) in those with MRCP. MRCP identified DPDS in 12 (27.2%) patients, all of whom were managed with indefinite drainage with double-pigtail plastic stents without recurrence. In the group without MRCP, PFCs recurred at a median interval of 284 days (interquartile range, 182-618 days) after transmural stent removal. Among the 13 patients with PFC recurrence, 11 (85%) had undiagnosed DPDS detected on subsequent imaging, of whom 9 were subsequently managed with indefinite double-pigtail plastic stents, with no further PFC recurrence. Patients with WON who underwent MRCP before transmural stent removal had a lower rate of PFC recurrence largely due to the identification of DPDS with appropriate endoscopic management.

Revolutionizing outcomes: endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage using innovative electrocautery enhanced-lumen apposing metal stents for high-risk surgical patients

This study retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (AC). Between January 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022, 58 high-risk surgical patients with AC underwent EUS-GBD with the novel electrocautery-enhanced LAMS. The technical success rate was 94.8% (55/58), with one case of duodenal perforation requiring surgery with complete stent migration and two of partial stent migration into the gallbladder. However, the clinical success rate was 100% (55/55). Recurrent AC occurred in 3.6% of the cases (2/55), managed with double pigtail plastic stents through the LAMS. Early AEs observed in 1.8% (1/55) due to stent obstruction. Late AEs occurred in 5.4% (3/55), including two cases of cholangitis and one of stent obstruction. For 33 patients followed over 6 months, LAMS maintenance was sustained in 30 cases. Two patients underwent double-pigtail plastic stent replacement after LAMS removal, and one underwent LAMS removal during surgery following tumor stage regression after chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma. The novel electrocautery-enhanced LAMS demonstrated high technical and clinical success rates in high-risk surgical patients with AC, maintaining effective gallbladder drainage with minimal AEs during long-term follow-up, thus highlighting its efficacy and safety in challenging patients.

Conservative Management of Duodenal Intraperitoneal Contained Perforation Due to Neglected Double-pigtail Plastic Biliary Stent

Management of neglected biliary plastic stent complications can be challenging in high-risk individuals. Most cases of duodenal perforation are managed either surgically or with endotherapy. We present a rare case of neglected double-pigtail plastic biliary stent presenting with duodenal perforation, postpandemic, which was managed conservatively.

EUS-guided gallbladder drainage using a bicolored double-pigtail plastic stent facilitates appropriate stent positioning.

EUS-guided gallbladder drainage using a bicolored double-pigtail plastic stent facilitates appropriate stent positioning.

Multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents for the internal drainage of pancreatic fluid collections

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) including pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) and walled-off necrosis (WON) are complications after acute pancreatitis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) placement to manage PFCs. Between June 2019 and May 2023, patients with symptomatic PFCs who underwent EUS-guided electrocautery-enhanced LAMS drainage were enrolled retrospectively from eight tertiary centers in Taiwan. In total, 33 [14 (42.42%) PP and 19 (57.58%) WON] patients were enrolled. Gallstones (27.27%) and abdominal pain (72.73%) were the most common etiology and indication for drainage. The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 96.97%, respectively, and the mean procedure time was 30.55 (± 16.17) min. Complications included one (3.03%) case of self-limited bleeding; there were no cases of mortality. Seven (21.21%) patients had recurrence. Patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) had a higher recurrence rate than those without (71.43% vs. 38.46%, p = 0.05). After replacing LAMSs with transmural double-pigtail plastic stents (DPSs) in the DPDS patients, the DPS migration rate was higher in the patients with recurrence (100% vs. 33.33%, p = 0.04). In conclusion, drainage of symptomatic PFCs with EUS-guided electrocautery-enhanced LAMS appears to be efficient and safe. Replacing LAMSs with DPSs in DPDS patients was associated with a lower recurrence rate.

Equivalent efficacy and safety of plastic stents and lumen-apposing metal stents in the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections: a prospective cohort study.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage using double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) has been routine for the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections (PFC). Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have since their introduction been the preferred choice; however, their superiority has not been proven. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of DPPS and LAMS. This was a single-center, prospective study that included consecutive patients undergoing EUS-guided drainage between January 2010 and December 2020. The primary endpoints were technical success, clinical success and adverse event rate, while the secondary endpoints included symptomatic relief, length of hospital stay, and need for adjunct drainage. A subgroup analysis of walled-off necrosis (WON) was performed. A total of 89 patients (median age 56 years) underwent EUS-guided transmural drainage (DPPS: n=53; LAMS: n=36) because of a pseudocyst (n=37) or a WON (n=52). Both DPPS and LAMS had a 100% technical success rate and a comparable adverse event rate (4% vs. 6%, P=0.24). An equivalent efficacy was recorded for the drainage of PFC comparing DPPS and LAMS, and no significant statistical difference was recorded in clinical success (DPPS 60% vs. LAMS 61%, P=0.94) or the need for reintervention (DPPS 11% vs. LAMS 13%, P=0.72). In this large, prospective study of EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, LAMS and DPPS showed equivalent safety, technical success, clinical success and hospital stay. Both techniques were associated with a comparable need for complementary necrosectomy.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided lumen-apposing metal stent with or without coaxial plastic stent for pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing safety and efficacy.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are preferred for draining symptomatic large pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A concurrent coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) is proposed to reduce adverse events associated with LAMS. We aimed to perform a comparative outcome analysis of LAMS with or without DPPS for PFCs. Electronic databases from January 2005 through July 2023 were searched for studies comparing the use of LAMS with or without DPPS for PFCs. Pooled proportions were calculated using fixed (inverse variance) and random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models. After reviewing 1780 studies, we extracted data from 6 studies comprising 348 patients. The weighted odds of overall technical success, using LAMS plus DPPS compared to LAMS alone, were 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-1.83), and the odds of clinical success were 1.10 (95%CI 0.59-2.05). The weighted odds of total adverse events with LAMS compared to LAMS plus DPPS were 2.21 (95%CI 1.37-3.59). Analysis of individual adverse events showed that the odds of stent occlusion when LAMS alone was used compared to LAMS plus DPPS was 2.36 (95%CI 1.12-4.98). The odds of bleeding were 1.84 (95%CI 0.77-4.38), and the odds of stent migration 0.95 (95%CI 0.40-2.23). EUS-guided LAMS placement is the current standard of care for managing symptomatic large PFCs. Concurrent use of coaxial DPPS can mitigate the overall adverse events observed with LAMS, while maintaining similar technical and clinical success.

Two forgotten guests: biliary and pancreatic stents retained after 14 years.

We present a 54-year-old man with a previous complicated choledocholithiasis 14 years ago, treated with sphincterotomy and biliary and pancreatic stents placement by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The patient didn't attend the follow-up. On this occasion, seeks medical attention at this medical center for abdominal pain, jaundice, and fever. Laboratory tests report leukocytosis with neutrophilia, elevated C reactive protein, and hyperbilirubinemia with cholestasis. An ERCP was performed and showed inflammatory ampullary tissue with a previous pancreatic and biliary stent in situ, both were removed succesfully with cold snare. Cholangiogram revealed a dilated bile duct and filling defects compatible with large stones. Due to the soft consistency of the stones, some of them were removed by balloon catheter without complete extraction, therefore a double pig-tail plastic stent was placed (Figure 2) and new ERCP in 4 weeks. The patient received antibiotic therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam with a favorable evolution. During follow-up, a new ERCP was performed with extraction of stones and removal of the stent; there was no evidence of secondary biliary cirrhosis.

Large Single-center Experience with Long-term Outcomes of EUS-guided Transmural Gallbladder Drainage.

To describe the long-term outcomes of patients after EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), including those who underwent standardized stent exchanges for permanent plastic stents. EUS-GBD has become one of the first-line alternatives for gallbladder decompression, with outcomes and safety profiles comparable to that of percutaneous gallbladder drainage. However, the long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD are not well-described. We report our single-center experience of a large cohort who underwent EUS-GBD. Patients who underwent EUS-GBD from August 2014 to December 2022 were included in the study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedure details were recorded. Patients were followed until complete stent removal, end of study period, or death. Short and long-term outcomes include technical and clinical success, stent patency, recurrent cholecystitis, cholecystectomy, and death. During the study period, 128 patients were included. One hundred and one patients had benign indications for EUS-GBD, including cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis. Of those with malignant indications, 23 of 27 had distal malignant biliary obstruction. Technical and clinical successes were 95.3% and 95.1%, respectively. Stents were exchanged for 2 permanent double pigtail plastic stents in 43.0%. The mean stent patency was 421 days (488 d among those still alive) without any recurrent cholecystitis. EUS-GBD demonstrates prolonged stent patency and minimal long-term adverse events, particularly among patients who underwent stent exchanges for permanent plastic stents. EUS-GBD is also promising for patients presenting with choledocholithiasis and biliary colic who are not surgical candidates.

A technique for leaving long-term indwelling double-pigtail plastic stents after resolution of pancreatic fluid collections

Video 1Demonstration of the endoscopic technique of leaving long-term indwelling plastic stent(s) when a lumen-apposing metal stent is removed after pancreatic fluid collection resolution.

Lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stent placement for the management of pancreatic fluid collections

Coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) placement is often performed within lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) to prevent adverse events (AEs) such as stent occlusion and bleeding. This study compares the safety and outcomes of LAMSs alone versus LAMSs with coaxial DPPSs for PFC management. Patients undergoing drainage of a PFC with LAMSs were retrospectively identified and categorized as LAMS or LAMS/DPPS based on initial drainage strategy. The AE rate, AE type, and clinical success were extracted by chart review. One hundred eighty-five individuals (83 LAMS, 102 LAMS/DPPS) were identified. No significant differences were found in rates of clinical success (75.9% LAMS vs 69.6% LAMS/DDPS, P= .34) or overall AEs (15.7% LAMS vs 15.7% LAMS/DPPS, P= .825). In this comparative single-center study, placement of a coaxial DPPS for drainage of PFCs with LAMSs did not affect rates of AEs or clinical success.

Simple endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder aspiration/irrigation using a double-pigtail plastic stent system.

Simple endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder aspiration/irrigation using a double-pigtail plastic stent system.

EUS-guided transluminal drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stents for treatment of walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective bicentric randomized controlled trial.

Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have proven to be effective for drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), although associated adverse events (AEs) have been reported. Anchoring coaxial double-pigtail plastic stents (DPSs) within LAMSs have been proposed to prevent LAMS-related AEs but have not been assessed in prospective studies. We aimed to evaluate the utility of such measures with a randomized controlled trial. We randomly assigned consecutive patients with WON indications for drainage to EUS-guided transluminal drainage using LAMSs with (group A) or without (group B) DPSs. All LAMSs were to be removed after 3 weeks had elapsed from the index procedure with a preceding CT to decide whether additional steps needed to be taken (eg, transluminal necrosectomy or placing transluminal plastic stents in patients with incomplete resolution of WON). The main outcomes were failure of the index method, defined as necessity of reintervention (endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical) before LAMS removal because of LAMS-related AEs and/or clinical deterioration; AE rates; and mortality with LAMS in place. Variables were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, or Fisher exact test as appropriate. P< .05 was considered significant. Sixty-seven patients (37.3% women; mean age, 54 ± 14.4 years) underwent LAMS placement with (n= 34) or without (n= 33) DPS placement in 2 tertiary centers. Baseline characteristics including demographics, etiology, comorbidity, and clinical presentation (sterile vs infected necrosis) were comparable between both groups. The technical success rate in placing LAMSs and DPSs was 100%. The global rate of AEs was significantly lower in group A versus group B (20.7% vs 51.5%, respectively; P= .008). Stent occlusion was the most frequently observed AE (14.7% vs 36.3%, P= .042). Failure of the index method was lower in group A versus group B (29.4% vs 48.5%, respectively; P= .109); however, the difference did not achieve statistical significance. The same applied to the mortality rate with LAMSs in place (2.9% vs 12.1%, P= .197). The addition of a coaxial DPS within a LAMS was associated with a significantly lower global rate of AEs and stent occlusion rate in EUS-guided drainage of WON. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03923686.).

EUS Kılavuzluğundaki Hepatikojejunostomi Sırasında Öngörülemeyen Olay

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage is a therapeutic alternative method in patients with cholestasis where the ampulla of Vater cannot be reached because several reasons. An unfortunate complication during EUS-guided biliary drainage was presented in this report. A 53-year-old male patient presented with jaundice and pruritus. He had a history of total gastrectomy due to gastric cancer. An abdominal tomography scan detected a tumoral mass in the common bile duct due to the recurrence of gastric cancer. We decided to perform EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy because biliary drainage cannot be obtained by conventional methods and percutaneous drainage impairs patient comfort. A double pigtail plastic stent was placed from the jejunum into the segment-3 bile duct towards the hilus. After that echoduodenoscope was removed to the outside gently. We noticed that the stent was stuck in the echoduedonoscope elevator. We reached into the bile duct again and placed a double-pigtail plastic stent successfully.