Urate-lowering Therapy Dose Research Articles

P085 Implementing treat-to-target urate-lowering therapy during hospitalisations for gout flares: a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background/Aims Hospitalisations for gout flares have doubled in England during the last 15 years. Despite this, no studies have evaluated strategies designed to increase the uptake of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in people hospitalised for gout flares. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in people hospitalised for gout flares. We designed and evaluated an intervention package that consisted of an optimal, in-hospital management pathway based upon BSR, EULAR and ACR guidelines, which encouraged ULT initiation prior to discharge, followed by a nurse-led, post-discharge review. Outcomes including: i) ULT initiation; ii) serum urate target attainment, and iii) re-hospitalisation rates were compared between patients hospitalised for flares in the 12 months post-implementation vs. a retrospective cohort of hospitalised patients from 12 months pre-implementation. Results 119 and 108 patients, respectively, were hospitalised for gout flares in the 12 months before and after the intervention was launched. For patients with six-month follow-up data available (n = 94 and n = 97, respectively), the proportion of patients who were newly initiated on ULT increased to 92% post-implementation, from 49% pre-implementation (age and sex-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 11.5; 95% CI 4.36-30.5; p < 0.001). More patients achieved a serum urate ≤360 micromol/L within six months of discharge (27% post-implementation vs. 11% pre-implementation; aOR 3.04; 95% CI 1.36-6.78; p = 0.007). The proportion of patients who were re-hospitalised for flares was 9% post-implementation vs. 15% pre-implementation (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.32; p = 0.18). Conclusion Following implementation of a strategy designed to optimise care during gout hospitalisations, more than 90% of ULT-naïve patients were initiated on ULT - nearly double the pre-implementation baseline. Despite greater initiation of ULT in the acute flare setting, recurrent hospitalisations did not increase following implementation; supporting the use of ULT in this setting. Improvements were seen in urate target attainment post-discharge; however, focused approaches to optimise ULT dose escalation to achieve target urate levels are required. Disclosure M.D. Russell: Honoraria; AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Menarini. Grants/research support; Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB. L. Ameyaw-Kyeremeh: None. F. Dell'Accio: None. H. Lapham: None. N. Head: None. C. Stovin: None. V. Patel: None. B. Clarke: None. D. Nagra: None. E. Alveyn: None. M.A. Adas: None. K. Bechman: Grants/research support; Versus Arthritis/Pfizer. M.A. de la Puente: None. B. Ellis: None. C. Byrne: None. R. Patel: None. A.I. Rutherford: Other; Educational support from Eli Lilly, UCB. F. Cantle: None. S. Norton: None. E. Roddy: None. J. Hudson: None. A.P. Cope: Honoraria; BMS, AbbVie, GSK/Galvini. Grants/research support; BMS. J.B. Galloway: Honoraria; Abbvie, Biovitrum, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, UCB.

Factors associated with achieving target serum uric acid level and occurrence of gouty arthritis: A retrospective observational study of Japanese health insurance claims data.

PurposeThis study assessed factors associated with achieving target serum uric acid (sUA) level and occurrence of gouty arthritis in Japanese clinical practice.MethodsJapanese health insurance claims and medical check‐up data from October 2015 to March 2017 were analyzed to assess factors associated with target sUA achievement in gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia and gouty arthritis in gout. Target sUA was further assessed by subgroup analysis of urate‐lowering therapy (ULT) prescriptions and outcomes, stratified by renal function.ResultsPatients achieving target sUA tended toward older, female, higher ULT dose, higher adherence, more comorbidities, and/or antidiabetic drugs prescribed. Renal dysfunction and/or diuretic prescriptions were associated with reduced achievement of target sUA. Severe renal dysfunction was particularly influential (odds ratio [OR] = 0.22 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10‐0.48] for <15, 0.15 [0.10‐0.23] for ≥15 to <30, compared with eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Across all renal function categories, mean prescribed ULT dose was low (febuxostat 17.0‐21.0 mg/day, allopurinol 123.1‐139.6 mg/day), and target sUA achievement was reduced among renal dysfunction patients. Gouty arthritis was more likely in patients with a prior history of such occurrences, and less likely for higher ULT adherence, sUA monitored regularly at medical facilities, and/or more comorbidities.ConclusionIn a real‐world setting, severe renal dysfunction is the most important risk factor for failure to achieve the target sUA, suggesting suboptimal disease management in patients with gout or hyperuricemia complicated by this condition. Findings associated with gouty arthritis suggest that these occurrences could be successfully managed by regular monitoring of sUA and closer adherence to ULT.

AB0932 FACTORS IN ACHIEVING TARGET SERUM URIC ACID LEVELS IN OUTPATIENT GOUT MANAGEMENT IN A MALAYSIAN TERTIARY RHEUMATOLOGY CENTRE

Background:Gout is one of the most common inflammatory arthropathies. A target serum uric acid of less than 300µmol/l is recommended when tophi are present, and less than 360µmol/l for non-tophaceous gout. Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) should be titrated until the target is achieved and long-term maintenance of the target concentration is recommended. Although ULT has been proven to reduce the uric acid level, less than half of treated patients achieved the target serum uric acid (sUA) in real-world clinical practice.Objectives:To assess the mean treat-to-target achievement in outpatient management of gout by the tertiary rheumatology centre and to identify factors influencing the success rate.Methods:Retrospective cross-sectional study of all patients with gout attending out-patient clinics in a rheumatology referral centre from 1stJanuary 2018 until 31stDecember 2018. Electronic medical records were reviewed. The successful target achievement is defined as mean of all available sUA in 2018 which is ≤360 and ≤300µmol/l for non-tophaceous and tophaceous gout respectively. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as glomerular filtration rate of less than 60ml/min.Results:There were 251 patients analysed with mean age of 56.3±13.8 years and disease duration of 10.5±9.2 years. Majority were males (215, 85.7%) and 133 (53%) patients had tophaceous gout. The rate of success achieving the target SUA level of ≤360 and ≤300µmol/l were 33.9% (40) and 15.8% (21) in non-tophaceous and tophaceous gout respectively. However, in patients who are compliant, the target sUA achieved is 52.4% (33) and 31.7% (19) in non-tophaceous and tophaceous gout respectively. Characteristics of patients who achieved the targeted sUA were patients of more than 50 years old (48, 78.7%), without family history of gout (29, 65.9%), were prescribed colchicine prophylaxis upon initiating ULT (46, 76.7%), with absence of joint erosions (34, 73.9%) and those with normal creatinine clearance (40, 65.5%). There were 120 (48.4%) patients who were compliant to ULT. In 42 compliant patients who achieved target sUA, the mean allopurinol dose is 289.66mg±101.2 and 369.23mg±175 in non-tophaceous and tophaceous gout respectively. Sub-analysis in 31 compliant CKD patients, revealed no difference in allopurinol dose between those who achieved versus non-achieved target sUA (mean 243mg versus 263mg respectively). However, we noted that 11 (61%) CKD patients with tophi did not achieved target sUA at dose less than 300mg allopurinol. Lower achievement of target sUA was significantly associated with presence of tophi (p=0.001), poor compliance (p= 0.000) and presence of more than one comorbidity (p=0.041).Conclusion:There are several challenges in achieving target uric acid level contributed by both patient and clinician factors such as compliance, presence of comorbidity and ULT dose. Our study suggests that higher dosage of allopurinol is required in patients with tophaceous gout, with or without renal impairment. However, the limitation of this study is, the small number of subjects which therefore needsfurtherinvestigation.

2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout.

To provide guidance for the management of gout, including indications for and optimal use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT), treatment of gout flares, and lifestyle and other medication recommendations. Fifty-seven population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions were developed, followed by a systematic literature review, including network meta-analyses with ratings of the available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, and patient input. A group consensus process was used to compose the final recommendations and grade their strength as strong or conditional. Forty-two recommendations (including 16 strong recommendations) were generated. Strong recommendations included initiation of ULT for all patients with tophaceous gout, radiographic damage due to gout, or frequent gout flares; allopurinol as the preferred first-line ULT, including for those with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD; stage >3); using a low starting dose of allopurinol (≤100 mg/day, and lower in CKD) or febuxostat (<40 mg/day); and a treat-to-target management strategy with ULT dose titration guided by serial serum urate (SU) measurements, with an SU target of <6 mg/dl. When initiating ULT, concomitant antiinflammatory prophylaxis therapy for a duration of at least 3-6 months was strongly recommended. For management of gout flares, colchicine, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or glucocorticoids (oral, intraarticular, or intramuscular) were strongly recommended. Using GRADE methodology and informed by a consensus process based on evidence from the current literature and patient preferences, this guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients making decisions on the management of gout.

Spectrum and dosing of urate-lowering drugs in a large cohort of chronic kidney disease patients and their effect on serum urate levels: a cross-sectional analysis from the German Chronic Kidney Disease study.

BackgroundDespite a plethora of studies on the effect of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), current guidelines on the treatment of hyperuricaemia and gout vary, especially concerning the need for dose adjustment of allopurinol, whose main metabolite is accumulating with declining renal function. Data on allopurinol dosing and its relationship to renal function, co-medication and sex and the resulting urate level in large cohorts are missing.MethodsWe studied a subgroup of 2378 patients of the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study to determine prescription patterns of ULT among CKD patients under nephrological care and the relationship of ULT dose to urate levels. Prescription and dosing of ULT were manually abstracted from the patient’s paper charts at the baseline visit, in which all currently used medications and their dosing were recorded.ResultsIn this cohort, 39.6% were women, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 51.3 ± 19.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the mean age was 59.0 ± 12.4 years. Of the 2378 examined patients, 666 (28.0%) received ULT. The dose of ULT was available for 572 patients. The main ULT agent was allopurinol (94.4%), followed by febuxostat (2.9%) and benzbromarone (2.6%). Of the 540 patients who used allopurinol with a reported daily dose, 480 had an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 320 had an eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, 31.5% of the latter (n = 101) received a dose >150 mg/day, the recommended maximal dose for this level of eGFR. The prescribed dose was not related to eGFR: the median eGFR for patients taking 100, 150 and 300 mg/day was 40 [interquartile range (IQR) 32–49], 43 (34–52) and 42 (35–54) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Patients with lower doses of allopurinol had higher serum urate levels than patients with higher (than recommended) allopurinol doses. Sex, alcohol intake, eGFR, use of diuretics and treatment with allopurinol were independent determinants of serum urate levels in multivariate regression analysis.ConclusionsThe most frequently used drug to lower serum urate levels in this CKD cohort was allopurinol. Even in patients regularly seen by nephrologists, the dose of allopurinol is often not adjusted to the current eGFR. Patients with higher ULT doses achieved better control of their serum urate levels. Lowering of serum urate in CKD patients requires balancing potential adverse effects of allopurinol with suboptimal control of serum urate levels.

Comorbidity in gout at the time of first diagnosis: sex differences that may have implications for dosing of urate lowering therapy

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to examine the occurrence of comorbidities at the time of first diagnosis of gout compared with matched population controls, overall and by sex, as well as to examine the crude and age-standardized prevalence of these comorbidities in men and women with gout at first diagnosis.MethodsA population-based study used data from Swedish national and regional registers, including 14,113 gout patients aged ≥ 20 years, with a first recorded diagnosis of gout between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012, and 65,782 population controls, matched by age, sex and county. Prevalence ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing gout cases and controls were calculated, overall and by sex. Crude and age-standardized prevalence (95% confidence interval) of all comorbidities in gout patients were calculated, to show differences between sexes, taking also the higher age at diagnosis in women into account.ResultsAll examined comorbidities were 1.2–2.5-fold more common in gout patients at diagnosis than in population controls in both sexes. Women with gout were on average 6 years older than men at first gout diagnosis and most comorbidities, including obesity and diuretic use, were or tended to be more frequent in women than in men. When standardizing for age, women had a higher prevalence of thromboembolism (6.6% vs 5.2%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.1% vs 2.4%). Men, on the other hand, had a higher prevalence of coronary heart disease (9.4% vs 6.4%), atrial fibrillation (9.0% vs 6.0%), congestive heart failure (7.7% vs 6.6%) and stroke (4.1% vs 3.3%).ConclusionsThe occurrence of most comorbidities was significantly increased at first diagnosis of gout in both sexes. Women were older at diagnosis and had higher occurrence of most comorbidities, including obesity and diuretic use, factors that increase serum urate, and this needs to be taken into account when starting and optimizing urate lowering therapy. These sex differences were attenuated when standardizing for age and the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases was actually higher in men.

Design and Rationale for the Veterans Affairs “Cooperative Study Program 594 Comparative Effectiveness in Gout: Allopurinol vs. Febuxostat” Trial

BackgroundGout patients do not routinely achieve optimal outcomes related in part to suboptimal administration of urate lowering therapy (ULT) including first-line xanthine oxidase inhibitors allopurinol or febuxostat. Studies leading to the approval of febuxostat compared this agent to allopurinol in inappropriately low, fixed doses. We will compare allopurinol with febuxostat in gout using appropriately titrated doses of both agents and a “treat-to-target” strategy congruent with specialty guidelines. MethodsWe have planned and initiated the Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Study Program (CSP) 594, Comparative Effectiveness in Gout: Allopurinol vs Febuxostat study. This large double-blind, non-inferiority trial will enroll 950 gout patients randomized to receive allopurinol or febuxostat. Patients will be followed for a total of 72 weeks encompassing 3 distinct 24-week study phases. During Phase I (0–24 weeks), participants will undergo gradual dose titration of ULT until achievement of serum uric acid (sUA) <6.0 mg/dL or <5.0 mg/dL if tophi are present. Dose escalation will not be allowed during final three study visits of Phase 2 (24–48 weeks) and during Phase 3 (48–72 weeks). The primary study outcome is the proportion of participants experiencing at least one gout flare during Phase 3. Subsequent to the 72-week study, participants will be followed passively for up to 10 years after the study to assess long-term health outcomes. ConclusionWith its completion, the VA Comparative Effectiveness in Gout: Allopurinol vs Febuxostat study will demonstrate the central role of gradual ULT dose escalation and a treat-to-target strategy in gout management.

A survey of the assessment and management of gout in general practitioners and medical officers within the Illawarra Network, Australia.

To review the assessment and management of gout by general practitioners (GPs) and medical officers (MOs) within the Illawarra Network, Australia. A survey was sent to GPs and MOs within the Illawarra Network. Of 110 GPs, 45 responded. Of 129 MOs, 42 responded. The overall response was 32.6%. On analysis, 65.1% felt their knowledge of gout to be adequate and 61.6% thought they had been educated well. In acute assessment, 59.1% of GPs responded that the diagnosis of gout best be confirmed with a joint aspiration and 36.4% clinical suspicion. Differing, 85.7% of MOs chose a joint aspiration. In acute management, if colchicine were used, 59.1% of GPs would give 1 mg followed by 0.5 mg an hour later, then 0.5 mg twice daily, compared to 9.5% of MOs, while 20.5% of GPs would use 1 mg twice daily. Chronic management was answered poorly. After an acute attack, urate lowering therapy (ULT) would be started 14 days after by 47.7% of GPs, compared to 69.0% of MOs. GPs were more likely to start ULT within 7 days (52.3% vs. 31.0%). With dosing of ULT, 45.3% would treat to target, while 46.5% would dose to the creatinine clearance. Prophylactic therapy with ULT would be started by 81.8%, although only 17.4% would continue it for 3-6 months. There is poor adherence to recommended practice for dosing of colchicine in acute gout. Also in the management of chronic gout, in particular, the timing of starting ULT and the use of prophylaxis when initiating ULT.

Effect of Urate Lowering Therapy on Renal Disease Progression in Hyperuricemic Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

To determine whether urate lowering therapy (ULT) could delay renal disease progression in hyperuricemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We performed a retrospective review of hyperuricemic patients with stage 3 CKD followed from September 2005 to July 2014 in Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea. A total of 158 eligible patients were identified and 65 of them were treated with ULT in addition to the usual CKD management. We divided the patients according to the use of ULT and compared the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change from baseline value and the proportion of renal disease progression (decline of eGFR > 30% of the baseline value, initiation of dialysis or eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m(2)) at the time of last followup. Risk factors for renal disease progression were identified by logistic regression analysis. After a median followup of 118.5 weeks (minimum 25, maximum 465), the ULT group showed better outcomes compared to the non-ULT group in terms of eGFR change from baseline (-1.19 ± 12.07 vs -7.37 ± 11.17 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p = 0.001) and the proportion of renal disease progression (12.3% vs 27.9%, p = 0.01). Goal-directed ULT showed better clinical outcomes compared to maintaining the initial ULT dose. Actual (area under the SUA-time curve adjusted by total observation time period) serum uric acid was significantly associated with the risk of renal disease progression (p for trend = 0.04) and actual serum uric acid level < 7 mg/dl reduced the risk of renal disease progression by 69.4%. ULT significantly delayed renal disease progression in hyperuricemic patients with CKD. Goal-directed ULT seems to be better than continuing the initial ULT prescription.

Patient and clinical characteristics associated with gout flares in an integrated healthcare system.

Gout flares have been challenging to identify in retrospective databases due to gout flares not being well documented by diagnosis codes, making it difficult to conduct accurate database studies. Previous studies have used different algorithms, and in this study, we used a computer-based method to identify gout flares. The objectives of this study were to identify gout flares in gout patients newly initiated on urate-lowering therapy and evaluate factors associated with a patient experiencing gout flares after starting drug treatment. This was a retrospective cohort study identifying gout patients newly initiated on a urate-lowering therapy (ULT) during the study time period of January 1, 2007–December 31, 2010. The index date was the first dispensed ULT prescription during the study time period. Patients had to be ≥18 years of age on index date, have no history of prior ULT prescription during 12 months before index date, and were required to have 12 months of continuous membership with drug benefit during pre-/post-index. Electronic chart notes were reviewed to identify gout flares; these reviews helped create a validated computer-based method to further identify patients with gout flares and were categorized into 0 gout flares, 1–2 gout flares, and ≥3 gout flares during the 12 months post-index period. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine patient and clinical factors associated with gout flares during the 12-month follow-up period. There were 8905 patients identified as the final cohort and 68 % of these patients had one or more gout flares during the 12-month follow-up: 2797 patients (31 %) had 0 gout flares, 4836 (54 %) had 1–2 gout flares, and 1272 patients (14 %) had ≥3 gout flares. Using a multivariate regression analyses, factors independently associated with 1–2 gout flares and ≥3 gout flares versus no gout flares were similar, however, with slight differences, such as younger patients were more likely to have 1–2 gout flares and patients ≥65 years of age had ≥3 gout flares. Factors such as male gender, not attaining sUA goal, having ≥3 comorbidities, diuretics use, no changes in initial ULT dose, and not adhering to ULT all were associated with gout flares versus no gout flares. Using a new method to identify gout flares, we had the opportunity to compare our findings with the previous studies. Our study findings echo other previous studies where older patients, male, diuretics, having a greater number of comorbidities, and non-adherence are more likely to have more gout flares during the first year of newly initiating ULT. There is an unmet need for patients with gout to be educated and managed more closely, especially during the first year.

FRI0397 Adherence to EULAR recommendations for the treatment of GOUT

BackgroundGout is a relatively common condition with low adherence to urate-lowering therapy (ULT) which leads to frequent flares and disability. To improve patient care the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)...

Prescription and dosing of urate-lowering therapy, rather than patient behaviours, are the key modifiable factors associated with targeting serum urate in gout

BackgroundLong term serum urate (SU) lowering to a target of <0.36 mmol/l (6 mg/dl) is recommended for effective gout management. However, many studies have reported low achievement of SU targets. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the clinical and psychological factors associated with SU targets in patients with gout.MethodsPatients with gout for <10 years were recruited from primary and secondary care settings. SU target was defined as SU concentration <0.36 mmol/L at the time of the study visit. Both clinical and psychological factors associated with SU target were analysed. The relationship between SU target and measures of gout activity such as flare frequency, tophi, work absences, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-II was also analysed.ResultsOf the 273 patients enrolled into the study, 89 (32.6%) had SU concentration <0.36 mmol/L. Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) use was strongly associated with SU target (p < 0.001). In those patients prescribed ULT (n = 181), allopurinol dose, patient confidence to keep SU under control, female sex, and ethnicity were independently associated with SU target. Other patient psychological measures and health-related behaviours, including adherence scores, were not independently associated with SU target in those taking ULT. Creatinine clearance, diuretic use, age, and body mass index were not associated with SU target. Patients at SU target reported lower gout flare frequency, compared with those not at target (p = 0.03).ConclusionsULT prescription and dosing are key modifiable factors associated with achieving SU target. These data support interventions focusing on improved use of ULT to optimise outcomes in patients with gout.

CaseBook Consults: Improving Outcomes in Gout (Multimedia Activity)

Gout is a chronic, potentially debilitating condition characterized by an inflammatory process in the joints or periarticular tissues that results from the deposition of monosodium urate crystals. Underdiagnosis and undertreatment can lead to the development of tophi and chronic arthropathy. A presumptive diagnosis of gout can be made on the basis of the clinical presentation as well as risk factors such as metabolic syndrome. Key conditions to rule out in the differential diagnosis are septic arthritis, calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (pseudogout), fracture, and rheumatoid arthritis. Acute flares of gout should be managed with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine, or corticosteroids. With a diagnosis of gout, if urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is required, prophylaxis should be considered with low-dose colchicine or an NSAID, followed by the addition of ULT. The goal of ULT is to reach a serum uric acid (SUA) level ≤6.0 mg/dL. Measurements of SUA should be obtained after resolution of an acute attack, then periodically to facilitate titration of the ULT dose to achieve the target SUA level. Studies have confirmed significant reductions in gout attacks among patients who have attained SUA levels ≤6.0 mg/dL with ULT. Patient education concerning the disease and its treatment is essential to ensure close adherence with recommended therapies. Patients should also understand that ULT is intended as long-term, and for most patients, lifelong therapy to maximize the prospects for control of the disease. Clinicians should feel confident in making a presumptive diagnosis and choosing a therapeutic regimen for gout while effectively communicating with and educating patients about their disease.