e16212 Background: No established risk factors or toxicity biomarkers exist for HCCs treated with ICI, even though they are commonly used in clinical practice. The outcomes in real-world practice are worse than those reported in clinical trials. This retrospective review aims to identify HCC patients at high risk of failing ICI therapy. Methods: HCC patients who received at least one ICI dose between 1/1/2017 and 5/30/2023 (before tremelimumab/durvalumab approval) at the Ohio State University were included in this study. The patient's baseline (BL) characteristics (at the first dose of ICI) were extracted with immune-related adverse event (irAE) details and survival outcomes. We examined BL characteristics significantly different in poor (progression-free survival (PFS) ≤ median (m)) and worst (PFS ≤ 25% percentile) responders, and poor (overall survival (OS) ≤ m) and worst (OS ≤ 25% percentile) survivors. Chi-square test and logistic regression were performed using JMP Pro 17 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results: Our cohort included 53 HCC patients. The median age was 66 years (range 40-86), with 81% male and 85% White (13% African American and 2% other). The median OS and PFS were 19 months (m) (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-26) and 5m (95% CI, 2-9), respectively. The poor responders (PFS ≤5m, N = 30) had patients with significantly higher alcohol history (AHx, 90% vs. 70%) and mean alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, 44, 155 vs. 811 ng/mL) levels, a higher proportion of Child-Pugh (CP) C (A/B/C %, 53/27/20 vs. 53/47/0), and negligible bevacizumab (bev, 77 vs. 24) use, all (p < 0.05). The worst response group (PFS ≤2m, N = 16), furthermore, had significantly (p < 0.05) higher Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade (G) 3 patients (50% vs. 16%), higher mean total bilirubin (2 vs. 1,2 ng/mL), lower tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI, 7% vs. 46%), and lower mean albumin (Ab, 3 vs. 3.4) levels. A significantly (p < 0.05) higher fraction (fx) of poor survivors (OS ≤19m, N = 33) got ICI In the first or second line (85% vs. 45%) and did not receive any locoregional therapy (LRT, 66% vs. 35%). The worst survivors (OS ≤8m, N = 14) got ICI in the first line (100% vs. 59%, p = 0.04, and significantly (p < 0.05) lower Alb (3 vs. 3,4) and higher AFP (90620 vs. 3104) levels. The irAE group (N = 10, 19%) had higher AFP (115289 vs. 3482, p = 0.01) and a lower distant metastasis rate (20% vs. 58%, p = 0.02), and none of them received bev (0% vs. 30, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Response to ICI depends on BL liver function (AHx, ALBI, CP, Alb) and combination therapy (bev). Survival depends on HCC management up to the administration of ICI (LRT and TKI).
Read full abstract