Dose Rounding Research Articles

Reducing Cancer Drug Cost: 3-Year Analysis of Automated Dose Rounding in Electronic Health Records.

Globally, cancer drug expenditure exceeds $185 in US dollars (USD) billion, with the United States contributing $75 (USD) billion. Many cancer drug doses are calculated on the basis of body weight or body surface area, which often results in leftover drug in partially used single-dose vials (SDVs). The cost of wasted drug is a huge financial burden on the US health care system. We evaluated the cost savings resulting from the reduction of SDV wastage, achieved through the implementation of automated dose rounding rules in electronic health records (EHRs). Mayo Clinic implemented automated dose rounding rules within the EHR. These rules were designed to round calculated doses to the nearest SDV if the vial size closely matched the original calculated dose, within a 10% threshold. We assessed doses administered between January 2019 and December 2021, and computed cost-savings, waste reduction, and cost of waste for chemotherapy drugs. In 3 years, 36.1% of doses were rounded down, 35.8% were rounded up, and 28.1% were exact doses. By rounding doses down to a vial size, we achieved cost-savings of $39.75 (USD) million and prevented 62,065 SDV of cancer drugs from going to waste. By rounding doses up, we avoided wasting $9.95 (USD) million worth of drugs. However, there were still instances where the rounding fell outside of the 10%, resulting in wasted drugs worth $25 (USD) million. The substantial burden imposed on patients and the US health care system because of cancer drug wastage is of significant concern. Although the automated dose rounding system represents a partial solution for this issue, a comprehensive approach involves the imperative development of policy and legislative solutions to effectively mitigate the challenges associated with cancer drug waste.

Oncology stewardship practice in the United States: A Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association national survey.

The treatment of cancer is associated with high risk for toxicity and high cost. Strategies to enhance the value, quality, and safety of cancer care are often managed independently of one another. Oncology stewardship is a potential framework to unify these efforts and enhance outcomes. This landscape survey establishes baseline information on oncology stewardship in the United States. The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) distributed a 38-item survey composed of demographic, institutional, clinical decision-making, support staff, metrics, and technology sections to 675 HOPA members between 9 September 2022 and 9 October 2022. Most organizations (78%) have adopted general pharmacy stewardship practices; however, only 31% reported having established a formalized oncology stewardship team. More than 70% of respondents reported implementation of biosimilars, formulary management, and dose rounding as oncology stewardship initiatives in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Frequently cited barriers to oncology stewardship included lack of clinical pharmacist availability (74%), lack of oncology stewardship training (62%), lack of physician/provider buy-in (32%), and lack of cost-saving metrics (33%). Only 6.6% of survey respondents reported their organization had defined "value in oncology." Lack of a formalized stewardship program was most often cited (77%) as the rationale for not defining value. Less than one-third of respondents have established oncology stewardship programs; however, most are providing oncology stewardship practices. This manuscript serves as a call to action for stakeholders to work together to formalize oncology stewardship programs that optimize value, quality, and safety for patients with cancer.

Impact of preparation and execution of strategy to mitigate the platinum shortage within a network of community oncology practices.

e13572 Background: The US Oncology Network (USON) is made up of over 600 sites of care and treats 1,400,000 patients annually. Drug shortages have a massive impact on patient outcomes, particularly with limited source oncology medications. Proactive mitigation strategies by the national USON Pharmacy & Therapeutics (P&T) committee are examined to assess impact on cisplatin and carboplatin (cis/carbo) shortages, where a phased approach extended supply for patients. Methods: P&T began implementing gradual reductions in cis/carbo allocations in mid-April 2023. This included stewardship to reserve use in patients with limited alternatives, dose rounding, reducing dose/cycle, and extending cycle interval, when clinically appropriate. As supply depletion became imminent, P&T implemented a novel drug ordering process that restricted cis/carbo use criteria to curative intent without alternative treatment options, requiring case-by-case approval. Comprehensive clinical guidance was developed to provide recommendations for alternative therapies. Alternative regimen templates were built into the centrally managed EHR. To evaluate the impact, drug utilization patterns were tracked during the 6-month shortage (April - September 2023) and compared to historical data. Results: Pronounced impacts were seen during acute supply constraints: cisplatin administrations (admins) and mg decreased to 53% and 48% of baseline, carboplatin admins and mg decreased to 84% and 78%. Compared to the prior 6 months, patients receiving cis/carbo was similar pre-shortage (15,368) vs. during (15,296).Mitigation strategies resulted in preservation of cis/carbo admins for diseases with limited alternatives (NSCLC, head & neck, ovarian/uterine); other cancers with alternatives had a decrease in admins (see table). Dose conservation guidance led to a decrease in average mg administered by 5.1% for cisplatin (72.2 vs. 68.5), and 6.2% for carboplatin (385.5 vs. 361.7). New admins of oxaliplatin increased by 11% (4,230 vs 4,714), primarily in GI malignancies. Conclusions: The rigors of stewardship with a phased approach allowed USON to sustain new patients while conserving cis/carbo for those with limited alternatives. Frequent communication about supply status and conservation guidance was critical for transition to alternative treatment strategies. This experience tested USON organizational readiness for future shortages. [Table: see text]

Projected environmental and public health benefits of extended-interval dosing: an analysis of pembrolizumab use in a US national health system

Health care is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, leading to climate change and public health harms. Changes are needed to improve the environmental sustainability of health-care practices, but such changes should not sacrifice patient outcomes or financial sustainability. Alternative dosing strategies that reduce the frequency with which specialty drugs are administered, without sacrificing patient outcomes, are an attractive possibility for improving environmental sustainability. We sought to inform environmentally sustainable cancer care by estimating and comparing the environmental and financial effects of alternative, clinically equivalent strategies for pembrolizumab administration. We conducted a retrospective analysis using a cohort of patients from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in the USA who received one or more pembrolizumab doses between May 1, 2020, and Sept 30, 2022. Using baseline, real-world administration of pembrolizumab, we generated simulated pembrolizumab use data under three near-equivalent counterfactual pembrolizumab administration strategies defined by combinations of weight-based dosing, pharmacy-level vial sharing and dose rounding, and extended-interval dosing (ie, every 6 weeks). For each counterfactual dosing strategy, we estimated greenhouse gas emissions related to pembrolizumab use across the VHA cohort using a deterministic environmental impact model that estimated greenhouse gas emissions due to patient travel, drug manufacture, and medical waste as the primary outcome measure. We identified 7813 veterans who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab-containing therapy in the VHA during the study period. 59 140 pembrolizumab administrations occurred in the study period, of which 46 255 (78·2%) were dosed at 200 mg every 3 weeks, 12 885 (21·8%) at 400 mg every 6 weeks, and 14 955 (25·3%) were coadministered with infusional chemotherapies. Adoption of weight-based, extended-interval pembrolizumab dosing (4 mg/kg every 6 weeks) and pharmacy-level stewardship strategies (ie, dose rounding and vial sharing) for all pembrolizumab infusions would have resulted in 24·7% fewer administration events than baseline dosing (44 533 events vs 59 140 events) and an estimated 200 metric tons less CO2 emitted per year as a result of pembrolizumab use within the VHA (650 tons vs 850 tons of CO2, a relative reduction of 24%), largely due to reductions in distance travelled by patients to receive treatment. Similar results were observed when weight-based and extended-interval dosing were applied only to pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab in combination with oral therapies. Alternative pembrolizumab administration strategies might have environmental advantages over the current dosing and compounding paradigms. Specialty medication dosing can be optimised for health-care spending and environmental sustainability without sacrificing clinical outcomes. None.

Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in the emergency department

Study objectivesRabies is a zoonotic single-stranded RNA lyssavirus that can cause acute infections of the central nervous system (CNS) including encephalomyelitis, encephalitis, and meningoencephalitis that is progressively fatal. Rabies is more common in developing countries, but approximately 23,000 people in the United States (US) are estimated to have been exposed or to have received post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) yearly. Nebraska Medicine follows the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines for the vaccination series, as well as the 20 units/kg administration of immunoglobulin (RIG).Nebraska Medicine Medical Center (NMC) and Bellevue Medical Center (BMC) treat the scheduling of the complete rabies vaccine series differently. At both campuses, patients receive their immunoglobulin and first vaccine in the Emergency Department (ED). At NMC, patients are scheduled to receive the remainder of their vaccination series at the outpatient infusion center by the ED pharmacist. At BMC, the subsequent vaccinations are given as “Nurse Only” return visits to the ED. The objective of this study was to compare patient compliance of two different processes for follow-up rabies vaccine series completion. This project's primary aim was to determine the rate of patient compliance for follow up rabies vaccine doses. The secondary aims of this project were to determine if there was a difference in patient follow-up compliance between the two campuses, patient specific factors that impact compliance, and potential cost savings if a dose rounding protocol for RIG was utilized. MethodsThis retrospective chart review was completed as a quality improvement project. Data from patients who had received either rabies immunoglobulin and/or a rabies vaccine, were >18 years of age, and were not admitted were collected for a 3-year period from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022. Data were abstracted from the patient's EMR (electronic medical records) using a SQL (Structured query language) query of pre-identified data elements. When unable to abstract with SQL query, data elements were manually abstracted. All data abstracted was collated and descriptive analysis performed. ResultsA total of 723 individual encounters were identified during the study period. After combining rabies series for each individual patient, 173 unique patients remained. After exclusions were applied, 143 patients were included: 104 patients from NMC, and 39 from BMC. For the primary outcome, appropriate completion between the two campuses was 78.3%. When comparing the two campuses, completion rates were higher at NMC (82% vs. 69%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Appropriate completion of vaccine series was statistically significant for both payor and exposure type. Application of a dose rounding policy with those >45 kg, rounding to the nearest vial, as well as rounding down if at the midpoint interval, 56 fewer vials would have been used between the two campuses. This would have resulted in a potential cost savings of $57,928.64 over the study period.

Dose Rounding and Cost Reduction of Anticancer Agents at King Fahad Medical City, Saudi Arabia: A 1-Year Feasibility Study

Introduction: The exponential increase in the price of anticancer drugs has warranted looking for a cost-saving measure to counter their price rise. We aim to study the impact of dose rounding of biological and anticancer agents within a range of 10% of the ordered dose. Method: The study involved patients treated with anticancer agents between January 2018 and December 2018 at King Fahad Medical City’s (KFMC) comprehensive cancer center. An anticancer medication database was created for data collection and processing. All the eligible orders were processed by hematology and oncology physicians. A performance improvement methodology was used. The dose rounding was based on the patient’s preprinted order and the nearest available vial size. The potential impact on cost was measured in Saudi Riyals (SAR). Descriptive statistics were applied for data analysis and interpretation of the results. Results: A total of 26 anticancer medications were used for treating cancer patients, and 208 prescriptions were found to be eligible for dose rounding. Brentuximab was among the drugs, showing the highest cost saving at an estimated 20,600 SAR. In addition to reducing wastage and cost of medications, 7 min were saved per preparation episode in the post-intervention period. Conclusion: Data reflected that dose rounding of chemotherapy and biological agents up to a limit of 10% is a feasible approach and could potentially save extra cost and wastage of medications in the comprehensive cancer center of KFMC.

Evaluating cost savings in cytotoxic leftover management: A prospective study of vial sharing and dose rounding techniques in the Moroccan National Institute of Oncology.

Most intravenous anticancer drugs are administered in a dose per unit area or body weight, if not promptly administered to another patient cytotoxic leftover would be destroyed. To contain wastage, low-cost measures are highly desirable to contain and reduce expenditures without impairing the quality of care. The objective of the study is to evaluate the cost saved through the use of the two cytotoxic waste management techniques implemented in National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit, vial sharing and dose rounding. A 6-month prospective single centre study from 1 February to 1 August 2023 at the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat in Morocco. The number of prepared preparations and amount of drug saved by both vial sharing and dose rounding was collected using the centralized chemotherapy preparation unit's 'leftover tracking file', the corresponding cost saved were calculated and then compared for each technique and with 2018 results. In total, 18,218 preparations were considered in the 6-month study. With the vial sharing technique 636,524.5 mg were saved corresponding to 246,031.4 (USD) saved cost, against 212,838.4 mg by dose rounding corresponding to 75,598.5 (USD) saved cost. This saving corresponded to a total of 321,629.4 (USD). Compared to the 2018 results leftovers costs saved by vial sharing corresponded to 289,972.05 (USD) by vial sharing technique for 1-year extrapolated period, and this study shows a saved cost of 321,629.9 (USD) by both vial sharing and dose rounding techniques. Dose rounding technique combined with vial sharing allowed National Institute of Oncology's centralized chemotherapy preparation unit to limit expensive cytotoxic cost wastage, highlighting these technique benefits.

Vincristine-Induced Neuropathy in Patients Diagnosed with Solid and Hematological Malignancies: The Role of Dose Rounding.

Vincristine is a vital constituent of chemotherapeutic regimens. Vincristine-induced neuropathy is a challenging adverse effect that impacts quality of life and treatment course. The dose rounding of chemotherapies is a strategy that is commonly used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the frequency of developed neuropathy in vincristine first-time users and the potential association with dose rounding remains elusive. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients administered vincristine for the first time between 2016 and 2022 using the King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) database. Patients were stratified into pediatric and adult groups. Neuropathy frequency, its association with demographic and clinical parameters, and the Impact of dose rounding were assessed using SPSS software version 28. Approximately 34.6% of patients were diagnosed with neuropathy after vincristine administration. Autonomic neuropathy was common among affected adults and pediatric patients (55.1% and 56.1%, respectively), while cranial neuropathy was more frequent in pediatric patients. Higher BSA (p = 0.038) and Scr (p = 0.044) in the pediatric group, the presence of respiratory comorbidities (p = 0.044), and the use of azole antifungals (p < 0.001) in the adult group were significantly associated with neuropathy episodes. The rounding-up of vincristine doses was significantly associated with increased neuropathy occurrence (p < 0.001), while dose rounding-down was significantly associated with a decrease in neuropathy in both groups of patients (p < 0.001). Our findings demonstrate that autonomic neuropathy is the most common vincristine-related neuropathy, regardless of the patient's age. Dose rounding is a significant determinant of vincristine-induced neuropathy in both groups. Further studies are needed to evaluate the variables that exacerbate or prevent neuropathy associated with the first-time use of vincristine.

Dose rounding bevacizumab and its biosimilars to reduce drug waste in the oncology care model in a community oncology network.

1529 Background: The Oncology Care Model (OCM) was a 6-year long Medicare value-based care (VBC) program that rewarded practices for decreasing TCOC compared to a benchmark price, while maintaining high-quality cancer care. Drug waste from partially used single dose vials (SDV) of expensive anti-neoplastic agents is a leading contributor to avoidable Total Cost of Care (TCOC) expenditures for payers. Dose rounding (DR) of biological anti-neoplastic agents, using recommendations (https://www.nccn.org/docs/default-source/clinical/order-templates/hopa.pdf?sfvrsn=3af91118_6) from the Hematology Oncology Pharmacists Association (HOPA) and endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), is a standard approach to mitigate the impact of drug waste. Many of the practices in The US Oncology Network (The Network) adopted a DR program for biologic agents in 2018 as a strategy to reduce drug waste and TCOC. We studied the impact of a DR initiative targeting bevacizumab and its biosimilars (B+B) on TCOC and drug waste expenditures for The Network practices participating in the OCM. Methods: Claims data for 14 practices in The Network participating in the OCM were assessed. Drug administration data for B+B was used to evaluate drug waste, total dose, TCOC, DR and the financial impact of drug waste reduction on TCOC from 2017 to 2021. Results: In 2017, prior to implementing DR, an average of 5.3% (range 4.6% to 5.5%) of the total dose of B+B was wasted, with ~25% of B+B administrations having waste in excess of 10% of the total dose. Implementation of the initiative led to a reduction of waste on 30% of the total administrations of B+B across 14 OCM participant practices in The Network. As a result of DR, B+B drug waste decreased by 55% to an average of 2.5% (range - 2.3% to 2.7%) of the total dose in 2021. Decreasing drug waste resulted in TCOC reduction of approximately $100 per member episode per month (0.97% of TCOC) for episodes with B+B administrations in the OCM. The highest waste reduction was seen with B+B administered for treatment of gastrointestinal cancers (colon, rectal, anal, gastroesophageal, or pancreatic cancers) compared to other cancer types (lung, brain, ovarian, etc.), and for B+B administrations where drug waste was greater than 10% of the total dose (~50% reduction). Conclusions: Drug waste contributes avoidable expenditures to the TCOC. Implementing strategies such as DR can offset the impact of drug waste and offer meaningful TCOC savings for VBC programs such as the OCM. A similar DR approach may be adopted for other high-cost biologic agents where drug waste results from partial use of SDVs.

The clinical and financial impact of remote clinical oncology pharmacist engagement in community-based practices within The US Oncology Network.

The integration of clinical oncology pharmacists into multidisciplinary healthcare teams is not well-described in the community practice setting. This study aims to analyze the clinical and financial impact of a remote-based clinical oncology pharmacist in four community oncology practices within The US Oncology Network. Oncology-trained clinical pharmacists electronically reviewed chemotherapy orders for clinical optimization and financial stewardship within four community oncology practices. Each pharmacist was appointed at 0.5 full-time equivalents per practice. Financial, clinical, and workload metrics were tracked to monitor the impact of pharmacist engagement. Over 12 months, 5716 order reviews were completed with an intervention rate of 57%. The most common interventions identified by the pharmacists were interventions with clinical impact on the patient (36%), followed by dose rounding (35%) and therapeutic interchange (30%). Overall, interventions improved the cumulative practice margins by $1,455,033 and reduced total medication costs by $5,962,551. The average program return on investment was 415% (range 100-915%). Community oncology practices seek to provide high-value care in a lean, resource-constrained model. An oncology clinical pharmacist is a cost-effective and clinically invaluable care team member in community oncology practice. Pharmacists in this setting identified opportunities to improve medication safety and regimen optimization and demonstrated a significant tremendous financial impact on small-scale budgets in community oncology.

Oncology drugs need stewardship, too.

Donald C. Moore Dose rounding, expanding the use of biosimilars, and administering high-cost medications in outpatient settings are all strategies to bring the benefits of medication stewardship to cancer care, says Donald C. Moore, clinical oncology pharmacy manager at the Levine Cancer Institute in Charlotte, NC. Moore was the lead speaker at the December 4 session Not Just for Antimicrobials: Integrating Oncology Stewardship into Practice at the 2022 Midyear Clinical Meeting & Exhibition in Las Vegas, NV. “There is a growing sense in the general healthcare world and in pharmacy of stewardship outside the context of just... antimicrobials,” Moore said. “We’re really trying to optimize care while also trying to decrease the overall cost of care.” Moore said dose rounding, or defaulting to the nearest product vial size that’s within an acceptable percentage of the prescribed dose, can be appropriate for medications packaged in preservative-free, single-use vials. Clinical studies support the safety of dose rounding for monoclonal antibody therapies because they have wide therapeutic dose ranges.

Interventions to reduce waste and improve billing compliance with medications in single-dose vials.

The purpose of this process improvement project was to implement features in the electronic health record to help reduce inappropriate drug waste and Medicare billing noncompliance for injectable drugs in single-dose vials in outpatient settings. The pharmacy department mapped processes from order entry to dose administration and claims processing. They used the process map to identify gaps that could lead to inappropriate drug waste. The organization then chose 3 drugs they believed to be at high risk of excess waste and possible billing noncompliance after cross-referencing drug cost, volume of use, and previous Medicare audits in outpatient settings. They tested a grouper and dose rounding on these drugs and compared 3 months of claims before and after implementation to assess the impact on waste and billing compliance. This study evaluated 826 claims before implementation and 1,075 claims after implementation. A total of 455 of 826 (55.1%) preimplementation claims included drug waste compared to 224 of 1,075 (20.8%) postimplementation claims. Twenty-three claims before implementation included an amount of waste exceeding the smallest vial size, putting the institution at risk of billing noncompliance. No claims had excess waste in the postimplementation period. The approximate cost of total drug waste before implementation was $1,397,437, with approximately $23,730 from inappropriate carfilzomib claims. The approximate cost of waste after implementation was $569,041. This equated to a reduction in drug waste of approximately $828,396 for bevacizumab-bvzr, carfilzomib, and ipilimumab. Using a grouper and implementing dose rounding, the institution reduced drug waste, saved money, and reduced the incidence of claims noncompliant with Medicare Part B billing requirements.

Comparative cost savings of biosimilar and dose rounding utilization in oncology care.

The exponential rise in cancer costs has led many centers to utilize dose rounding to the nearest vial size when the difference in dose is ≤10% to decrease costs. The recent approval of several biosimilar products has presented another opportunity to mitigate the rising costs of oncology care. Scarce information exists about the expected cost savings of combining dose rounding strategies (DRS) with biosimilar use (BU). We therefore assessed the cost savings of combining DRS and BU. Electronic health record data for two health systems in Rhode Island were used to identify patients who received ≥1 of trastuzumab, trastuzumab-anns, bevacizumab, or bevacizumab-awwb from October 1, 2015 to September 1, 2020. Costs were estimated using Medicare drug pricing. Multivariable generalized estimating equations adjusting for age, gender, presence of metastases, dosing weight, and dose administered were used to compare costs per dose between the four exposure groups: DRS + BU, DRS only, BU only, and neither DRS or BU. A total of 1156 patients were administered 15,145 doses of drug. After covariate adjustment, average savings per dose was greatest in the DRS + BU group (vs. the neither DRS nor BU group); $331 for trastuzumab and $497 for bevacizumab. Combining dose rounding with biosimilar substitution for trastuzumab and bevacizumab resulted in significant cost savings per dose and should be implemented by healthcare systems.

Using real-world data to quantify chemotherapy waste at Mayo Clinic.

8 Background: At Mayo Clinic, the implementation of an automated chemotherapy dose rounding program has resulted in significant cost savings when doses are rounded down to a vial size, however, the cost burden from drug waste continues to be a significant issue when rounding to a vial size is not within our 10% rounding allowance. The mismatch between drug doses and the marketed vial sizes, along with the limitations to the use of single dose vials is a recognized problem, resulting in billions of dollars of wasted drugs in the United States.The goal of our study was to quantify the cost of the wasted amount of chemotherapy and biologic drugs after the implementation of an automated dose rounding program. Methods: Using the electronic health record (EHR), data was collected for biologic and oncolytic agents administered from 1/1/2019 through 12/31/2021. Drugs with waste documented during preparation and that were administered to cancer patients were selected for analysis. The % of doses with waste documented was calculated based upon the total number of all doses given. The total cost of the drug administered along with the cost of the amount of drug wasted were calculated based upon costs listed in the EHR at the time of administration. Results: For the 3-year period, 446,832 doses were dispensed with 47,626 (10.7%) of those doses having waste documented. The total cost of the drugs with documented waste was $114,323,203 with 21.9% ($25,086,608) accounting sole for wasted drug. Five drugs accounted for 59% of the total cost of the drug waste (Table). When examining individual drugs with a high % of doses with documented waste, methoxsalen, epirubicin, eribulin, topotecan, &amp; bortezomib each had &gt; 70% of doses with a documented wasted amount. Conclusions: Despite having an aggressive institutional dose rounding policy, drug waste still results in considerable and significant costs to the Mayo Clinic System. Our data likely underestimates the total cost of drugs waste given that waste documentation requires manual entry into the EHR at the time of preparation. Our results support the need to create and develop solutions that could lead to reduced waste costs which include re-examining the weight based dosing of drugs, mandating pharmaceutical companies to have vial sizes that more appropriately meet the range of standard dosing, developing more multi-dose vials that can be shared across multiple patients, utilizing closed-system transfer devices to extend beyond-use-dating time, or requiring pharmaceutical companies to reimburse payers and patients for the cost of the amount wasted. Drug waste is still a considerable issue and one that needs to be addressed at a policy level.[Table: see text]

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Pediatric Dose Rounding Protocol.

Medication errors are 3 times more likely to occur in pediatric populations due to calculation and rounding errors. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a pharmacist-driven pediatric dose rounding protocol on the dose rounding of medications, measurable volumes of inpatient and discharge prescriptions, and potential cost savings. This single center, quasi-experimental study evaluated patients younger than or equal to 18 years of age prescribed intravenous or enteral liquid medications during an inpatient, observation, or emergency department encounter. The primary outcome of rate of measurable dose volumes was evaluated pre- and post-implementation of the protocol. Secondary outcomes, including the number of discharge prescriptions affected by pharmacist dose rounding, an evaluation of protocol effect, and prescriptions dose rounded to limit the number of packages per dose, were evaluated using a cross-sectional analysis of the post-group. Four hundred seventy-seven patients and 1060 medications were evaluated in a 1-month period. The rate of measurable volumes increased from 72% to 93% in the post-group (p = 0.0001). In the post-group, 197 patients had 313 medications dose rounded by pharmacists per protocol. Of the 55 discharge medications in the post-group, 21 prescriptions (38%) matched inpatient orders that had been dose rounded by pharmacists. Twenty-four medications were rounded down to a whole package size resulting in an estimated cost savings of $117 (approximately $1400 per year). Implementation of a pharmacist-driven dose rounding protocol significantly increased the rate of measurable volumes administered to pediatric patients at our institution.

Assessment of rabies immune globulin dose rounding at a university health system

PurposeDescribe a dose rounding strategy for rabies immune globulin (RIG) administration. MethodsMulticenter, retrospective, observational review of patients that received RIG following an exposure from an animal with potential to transmit rabies infection in one health-system from March 2011 through December 2021. The primary outcome was to describe the RIG dose rounding strategy and population of patients that received RIG rounded to the nearest vial size compared to those that did not. Secondary outcomes evaluated additional costs and RIG international units (IU) wasted that could have occurred (rounded group) or did occur (not rounded group), re-presentation to the ED or primary care provider (PCP) within 7 days due to RIG related complaint, and occurrence of rabies infection. Data collection included patient demographics, exposure information, and RIG dose administered. Descriptive data and univariate analyses are reported. Cost and RIG IU wasted were calculated for the dosing strategies. Results426 patients were included; 373 (88%) had RIG rounded to the nearest vial size and 53 (12%) did not (mean age 36.1 years ±20.5, 51.6% male, most common exposures were bats [50%], type was bite [58%], and category III exposures [92%]). Those that had RIG rounded were younger and had lower total RIG doses, but similar IU/kg doses to those not rounded. A cost savings of $144,815 and prevention of 40,572 RIG IU wasted was calculated from those patients that had RIG rounded. There was no difference in the rate of re-presentation within 7 days and no cases of human rabies infection in the region during the study period. ConclusionsRIG dose rounding to the nearest vial size is associated with cost savings and prevention of wasting RIG IU. There was no association with re-presentation to the ED or PCP with RIG related issues within 7 days from administration.

Decreasing drug waste, reducing drug costs, and improving workflow efficiency through the implementation of automated chemotherapy dose rounding rules in the electronic health record system.

To decrease drug waste and cost by implementing automated chemotherapy dose rounding rules in the electronic health record (EHR). Dose rounding of chemotherapy is a recognized method for reducing drug waste, and professional organizations have published guidelines recommending dose rounding when possible. On the basis of current literature and guideline recommendations, Mayo Clinic developed system-wide consensus to allow dose rounding for biologic and chemotherapy agents to the nearest vial size if rounding resulted in the dose being within 10% of the originally calculated dose or to a convenient measurable volume, based on concentration of the drug, if rounding to the nearest vial size resulted in the dose being outside the 10% range. Oncology pharmacists reviewed and analyzed all drugs listed in the EHR used in injectable form for the treatment of cancer and developed dose rounding rules. The rules were implemented and applied at the dose calculation stage before provider signature. From January to June 2019, approximately 40,000 cancer treatment doses were administered. The rounding rules saved a total of 9,814 vials of drug, of which 5,329 were for biologic agents and 4,485 were for oncolytic drugs. This resulted in a total 6-month cost savings of $7,284,796 (in 2019 dollars; biologics, $5,727,402; oncolytics, $1,557,394). Systematic implementation of dose rounding rules utilizing the EHR can result in significant reduction of drug waste and realization of savings.

Strategies for Implementing Pediatric Dose Standardization: Considerations From the Vizient University Health System Consortium Pharmacy Network Pediatric Pharmacy Committee.

Pediatric patients are at a heightened risk for medication errors due to variability in medication ordering and administration. Dose rounding and standardization have been 2 practices historically used to reduce variability and improve medication safety. This article will describe strategies for implementing pediatric dose standardization. Local practice often dictates the operational decisions made at an institutional level, leading to a lack of a standard methodology. Vizient survey results demonstrate there is wide variation in dose standardization and ready-to-use (RTU) practices although most responding institutions have attempted to limit bedside manipulation to reduce medication error. There are many barriers to consider before pursuing dose standardization at an institution. These include selecting medications to standardize, calculating appropriate standardized doses, preparing RTU products, and supplying the products to the patient. Strategies to overcome implementation issues are described as well as identification of knowledge gaps related to the preparation and use of RTU products in the pediatric population. There is opportunity to enhance an institution's ability to provide RTU medications. Although there are several barriers, those that have had successful implementation have leveraged their information technology systems, garnered multidisciplinary support, and customized their practice to meet their operational demands.

161. Flucytosine Utilization and Dosing Practices at an Academic Medical Center

BackgroundThe typical dose of flucytosine is 25 mg/kg/dose every 6 hours for severe infections due to Candida and Cryptococcus. Many hospital protocols use ideal body weight (IBW) for initial dosing to achieve a goal peak serum concentration of 30-80 mcg/mL, but this is supported by very limited data. Our objective was to evaluate flucytosine dosing strategies, describe safety concerns, and explore financial benefits associated with using IBW.MethodsAll inpatient flucytosine orders for adults from 1/1/2015 through 10/31/2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Doses, weight used, flucytosine levels, adverse events, and potential cost savings associated with IBW dosing were characterized.ResultsDuring this period, 35 patients received flucytosine. The most common indications were cryptococcal meningitis (73%), pulmonary cryptococcosis (14%), and candidiasis (11%). Most patients were receiving concurrent liposomal amphotericin B (92%). Based on body mass index, most patients were overweight or obese (60%). Actual body weight was used for initial dosing in most cases (81%). Flucytosine peak monitoring was performed in 51% of cases. Initial peak levels were supratherapeutic in 10/19 cases (53%). Of those 10 patients, 70% were overweight/obese, and 60% would have received a lower initial dose if IBW had been used with dose rounding to the nearest 500mg capsule. Adverse events for all patients included new onset cytopenias, hepatic and renal dysfunction, occurring in 20%, 11%, and 60% respectively. Those with supratherapeutic levels had higher rates of new onset hepatic and renal dysfunction, 30% and 90% respectively. In 32% of cases, using IBW would have resulted in a lower daily dose, with an average dose reduction of 1888 mg, resulting in a mean cost savings per patient of &640/day using average wholesale price.ConclusionMost flucytosine orders were not dosed using IBW, which may have led to supratherapeutic levels. Using IBW for dosing in overweight patients may lead to reduced toxicity and potential cost savings. The default dosing weight for flucytosine in our electronic medical record will be set to IBW to encourage change.Disclosures Trevor C. Van Schooneveld, MD, FACP, BioFire (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator; Insmed (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator; Rebiotix (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator Bryan Alexander, PharmD, Astellas Pharma (Advisor or Review Panel member) Scott J. Bergman, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, BCPS, BCIDP, Merck & Co., Inc (Grant/Research Support) Scott J. Bergman, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, BCPS, BCIDP, Merck & Co., Inc (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support

Financial Impact of an Automated Oncology Dose-Rounding Initiative: One-Year Analysis.

Infusion drugs are regarded as one of the high-cost health care expenditures. One approach to decrease drug expenditures is by dose-rounding biologics and cytotoxic agents. The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association recommends that biologic and cytotoxic agents are rounded to the nearest vial size if they are within 10% of the ordered dose. The purpose of this initiative is to determine the impact of an automated dose-rounding algorithm on drug expenses. The dose-rounding algorithm was developed and integrated into the computerized physician order entry system for automated dose rounding to minimize impact on current workflow and to reduce medication errors. Twenty-four medications were preselected for dose rounding and included in the analysis. Ordered doses were automatically rounded to the nearest vial size if the dose was within 10% of the original dose. Prescribers then either reviewed and signed the rounded dose or manually entered the nonrounded dose. Cost savings were calculated as drug expense savings from doses rounded down. From July 2018 to June 2019, 10,206 doses of the selected medications were administered. Dose rounding occurred in 5,069 doses (49.7%). All 24 medications within the initiative were administered within the time of analysis. Of the rounded doses administered, 2,516 (49.6%) were rounded down to a commercially available vial size. Using wholesale acquisition cost pricing, the drug expense savings was approximately $3.6 million US dollars (USD). The medications with the highest savings were trastuzumab and ipilimumab, with annual savings of $756,780 USD and $494,517 USD, respectively. The automated dose-rounding algorithm at Michigan Medicine reduced drug expenditures substantially, and its integration within the computerized physician order entry system had minimal impact on current workflow.