Sorafenib Dose Reduction Research Articles

Real World Experience of FLT3-Inhibitor Post-Transplant Maintenance with Sorafenib Demonstrating Superior Overall- and Relapse Free Survival Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in FLT3-ITD Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) is known to have a significantly high risk of relapse even with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT), for which post-transplant maintenance therapy with FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) has been applied. Although there is a randomized trial comparing Sorafenib maintenance vs no treatment, real world experience is still limited. Despite the increased use of FTL3i maintenance in clinical practice, the optimal dose and duration of post-transplant Sorafenib maintenance remains uncertain. Accordingly, we performed a retrospective chart review to analyze the survival benefit with Sorafenib maintenance, dose tolerability and the impact of FLT3-ITD allele frequency (AF) at initial diagnosis of AML on treatment outcomes in the context of post-HCT Sorafenib maintenance. Patients and method We conducted a retrospective study including 69 patients who received an allogeneic HCT from 2019 to 2023 for AML with FLT3-ITD, of which 24 patients received Sorafenib as post-HCT maintenance therapy. Primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The use of Sorafenib maintenance treatment was treated as a time-dependent covariate and Mantel-Byar test (MBT) was conducted to compare outcomes between Sorafenib maintenance group vs others, which will avoid immortal bias. FLT3-ITD allele frequency (AF) was assessed by molecular PCR test, and the cutoff was determined using a binary recursive partitioning method with AF of 54.6% as a cutoff. Results Out of 69 patients, 61 (88%) were in CR1 vs 8 (12%) in CR2 prior to HCT. Sorafenib was started in 24 patients (35%) at a median of 95 days post-HCT with a dose of 200mg every other day (n=2), 200mg once daily (n=17) or 200mg twice daily (n=5). The most common maintenance dose was 200mg once daily (n=9), followed by 200mg twice daily (n=6), 200mg every other day (n=5), and 400mg twice daily (n=1). The median Sorafenib maintenance duration was 15 months (1-53 months) at the last follow-up. There were no relapses in the patients who completed 2 years of Sorafenib maintenance. Sorafenib was discontinued in 6 patients, due to relapse (n=2), death of unrelated cause (n=1), GVHD (n=1), pneumonitis (n=1) and recurrent hypoglycemia (n=1). Adverse events requiring Sorafenib dose reduction included, GI intolerance (n=7), skin rash (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=4), transaminitis (n=3), neuropathy (n=3), GVHD (n=2) and pneumonitis (n=2). The median follow-up duration for all the patients was 27 months (5-51) following HCT, or 13 months (1.3-48) following Sorafenib maintenance. Using Kaplan-Meier test, the 2-year RFS in patients on Sorafenib maintenance was 84.5% vs 40.5% for no Sorafenib (p=0.00049). The 2-year OS was 88.2% vs 53.9% (p=0.0043), respectively. The CIR was 9.8% vs 39.9% (p=0.00634), while the NRM was 5.6% vs 19.7% (p =0.122), respectively. In the MBT, Sorafenib maintenance was found to reduce the mortality risk by 62.5% (HR 0.375 (0.109-1.29], p=0.120) and reduced the relapse/mortality risk by 71.2% (HR 0.288 [0.084-0.984], p=0.047). With respect to FLT3-ITD AF, the group with higher AF showed extremely higher HR for RFS compared to those with lower FLT-ITD (HR 29.37 [3.007-286.8], p=0.0036). When evaluating RFS and OS with combined risk incorporating the use of Sorafenib and FLT3-ITD AF, we have 4 subgroups (figure 1). In patients with a lower AF, the RFS was 87.7% vs 56.8% in the Sorafenib (n=20), vs no Sorafenib group (n=31), respectively. In patients with a higher AF, the RFS was 66.7% vs 0.0% in the Sorafenib (n=3), vs no Sorafenib group (n=8; p=0.0009), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, we confirmed the 2-year RFS for patients who had a high FLT3-ITD and received Sorafenib maintenance was statistically significant when compared to no Sorafenib maintenance. Conclusion Sorafenib maintenance post-transplant in FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients significantly improves the OS and RFS. Sorafenib maintenance is tolerable with 200mg twice daily or lower in most patients. Reduced doses of Sorafenib improve tolerability, with no significant impact on increased risk of relapse. Higher AF group of FLT3-ITD at initial diagnosis defined by ≥54.6% using PCR, was associated with significantly increased risk of relapse even after HCT. Sorafenib maintenance seems to provide survival benefit in terms of RFS, particularly in the patients with higher AF FLT3-ITD.

Gossypol synergises antiproliferative effect of sorafenib in metastatic lung cancer cells following Chou-Talalay algorithm

Combination therapy has been proposed as a promising approach for lung cancer treatment, as it can enhance anticancer efficacy, and reduce dosages and adverse effects. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic potential of gossypol, a natural polyphenolic compound with sorafenib for treating lung cancer cells and elucidating its mechanism of action. The MTT assay was utilized to determine the IC50 of sorafenib and gossypol against A549 and NCI H460 cell lines. The Chou-Talaly algorithm was employed to determine the combination index (CI). A sub-effective concentration of sorafenib and gossypol was chosen to investigate the possibility of cytotoxic synergy. Autophagy biomarkers were identified using Western blotting, and the function of autophagy was determined using ATG5 siRNA. Results show that IC50 of sorafenib significantly reduced in A549 and NCI H460 cells when co-treated with gossypol. The combination treatment showed a synergistic cytotoxic effect against tested cell lines. The Chou-Talaly algorithm confirmed sorafenib's dose reduction index (DRI) up to 3.86. In A549 cells, combination treatment down-regulated p62 and up-regulated LC3-II, indicating the initiation of autophagy-dependent cytotoxicity. This was further confirmed by siRNA ATG5 knockdown. Additionally, the combination treatment exclusively targeted G0/G1 phase cancer cells. In conclusion, the combination of gossypol and sorafenib shows a synergistic increase in the cytotoxic effect by promoting autophagy and apoptosis.

Sorafenib-Induced Spiny Follicular Hyperkeratosis: A Case Report with Review of Literature

AbstractSorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor used in the treatment of various solid tumors. Mucocutaneous adverse events are experienced by 70 to 90% of the patients receiving sorafenib, underscoring the importance of awareness among oncologists and dermatologists. Spiny follicular hyperkeratosis (SFH) is a benign and rarely reported skin reaction linked to sorafenib. It is characterized by flesh-colored or white, follicular hyperkeratotic spicules, preferentially involving the face, scalp, upper trunk, and upper arms. Besides being acknowledged as a paraneoplastic cutaneous manifestation of multiple myeloma, SFH has also been linked to a few diseases and drugs, other than sorafenib. However, the precise etiopathogenesis remains to be elucidated. We report an interesting case of SFH in a 14-year-old child, 1 week following the initiation of sorafenib. Trichodysplasia spinulosa, multiple minute digitate hyperkeratosis, keratosis pilaris, filiform warts, and pityriasis rubra pilaris are morphologically similar conditions that were excluded by clinicopathological correlation. A complete resolution of skin rash following sorafenib dose reduction further reinforced our diagnosis. Our patient also developed hand-foot skin reaction, facial erythema, and eruptive nevi during treatment. The regrowth of curly hair following chemotherapy-induced anagen effluvium was an interesting development in our case. We report this case to familiarize clinicians with this rare entity.

Bevacizumab, With Sorafenib and Cyclophosphamide Provides Clinical Benefit for Recurrent or Refractory Osseous Sarcomas in Children and Young Adults.

ObjectiveChildren and adolescents with recurrent and metastatic solid tumors have a poor outcome. A previous phase 1 study (ANGIO1) targeting angiogenesis with bevacizumab, sorafenib, and cyclophosphamide, demonstrated a signal of activity in a subset of patients. Here we report the results of a cohort of pediatric and young adult patients treated at the recommended phase 2 doses.MethodsElectronic medical records of patients with refractory or recurrent solid tumors who received ANGIO1 therapy were reviewed. Treatment cycles lasted 21 days and included bevacizumab, sorafenib, and cyclophosphamide. Toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v5.0. Responses were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1).ResultsThirty-nine patients (22 male, 17 female; median age 15 years; range 1-22 years) received the treatment regimen. The most common diagnoses included bone sarcomas (n=21; 14 Ewing sarcoma, 7 osteosarcoma) and soft tissue sarcomas (n=9; 2 rhabdomyosarcoma, 3 synovial sarcoma, 2 desmoplastic small round cell tumors, and 2 high-grade sarcoma). The most common Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included hypertension (2, 5.4%) and hematuria (2, 5.4%). Five patients (13.5%) had a pneumothorax (3 at progressive disease, 1 post lung biopsy, and 1 spontaneous). Common Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were lymphopenia (19, 51%) and leukopenia (13, 35%). Sixteen patients (43.2%) developed palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia Grade 2 or less. A total of 297 cycles were administered. Twenty-three patients required a dose reduction of cyclophosphamide, sorafenib or bevacizumab during therapy, all of whom continued to have clinical benefit following dose modification. One patient (Ewing sarcoma) achieved a complete response after 11 cycles; 2 patients (Ewing sarcoma, high grade sarcoma) achieved a partial response following cycles 2 and 4, respectively and 20 patients had stable disease as a best response.ConclusionsIntravenous bevacizumab combined with oral sorafenib and metronomic cyclophosphamide was tolerated and required minimal supportive care or additional clinic visits. Disease stabilization for prolonged time periods was observed in greater than half of the treated patients. Patients with bone sarcoma demonstrated a signal of activity suggesting possible benefit from incorporation of the therapy as a maintenance regimen in upfront setting, or as a palliative regimen.

Sorafenib-related generalized eruptive keratoacanthomas (Grzybowski syndrome): a\xa0case report

BackgroundSorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets Raf serine/threonine receptor tyrosine kinases and inhibits tumor cell growth and angiogenesis. Cutaneous toxicities of sorafenib are common, including cutaneous eruptions (such as truncal erythema and seborrheic-dermatitis-like changes) and hand–foot syndrome. Keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas have been reported previously; however, we report a case of multiple eruptive keratoacanthomas in the form of Grzybowski syndrome after initiation of sorafenib.Case presentationWe report a 63-year-old Caucasian male who developed multiple cutaneous eruptive keratoacanthomas after starting sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. He had a known history of hepatitis-C-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, and previously had actinic keratosis and skin squamous cell carcinoma excision. Approximately two and a half months after starting sorafenib, the patient initially developed two lesions, one on each forearm, and after excision, these lesions demonstrated histological features of squamous cell carcinoma. One month later, the patient presented with approximately 48 new skin lesions of varying size on the back, bilateral upper limbs, and face requiring excisional biopsy of a large number of these lesions. Histopathology showed eruptive invasive keratoacanthomas (Grzybowski syndrome). Sorafenib was temporarily stopped and subsequently restarted at a lower dose. Acitretin 25 mg daily was commenced after few weeks, and no further keratoacanthomas developed during his treatment.ConclusionsWe report a unique case of sorafenib-associated Grzybowski syndrome. Temporary interruption and dose reduction of sorafenib and use of acitretin appeared to prevent further development of keratoacanthomas.

Effectiveness of sorafenib dose modifications on treatment outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis in real‐life settings

Controlling adverse events (AEs) through dose reduction can enhance drug adherence and treatment response. Currently, there is no guide for sorafenib dosing. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sorafenib dosing could affect treatment outcomes. A total of 782 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with sorafenib were evaluated for sorafenib dosing and its modifications via medical records at baseline and regular follow-up. Study outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), sorafenib duration, cumulative dose, AEs and drug discontinuation. The median patient survival was 7.7 months. Overall, 242 (30.9%) patients underwent dose reduction and 121 (17.5%) discontinued sorafenib due to AEs. In multivariate analysis, dose reduction was identified to be independently predictive of PFS and OS. The 800-to-400 mg/day group provided significantly better PFS than the 800 mg/day-maintained group or the 800-to-600 mg/day group. Likewise, the 800-to-400 mg/day group resulted in a significantly better OS than other dosing. However, dose reduction to 200 mg/day led to significantly worse PFS and OS. Hand-foot skin reaction and drug discontinuation due to AEs were higher in the 800-to-600 mg/day group than the 800-to-400 mg/day group. The 800-to-400 mg/day group had significantly longer treatment duration and higher cumulative dose than the 800 mg/day-maintained group. Sorafenib dose reduction can improve HCC survival and increase patient tolerance and adherence coupled with longer duration and higher cumulative dose. Dose reduction from 800 to 400 mg/day than to 600 mg/day is recommended when clinically warranted. However, dose reduction to 200 mg/day is not recommendable.

Alternative splicing in human cancer cells is modulated by the amiloride derivative 3,5-diamino-6-chloro-N-(N-(2,6-dichlorobenzoyl)carbamimidoyl)pyrazine-2-carboxide.

Alternative splicing (AS) is a process that enables the generation of multiple protein isoforms with different biological properties from a single mRNA. Cancer cells often use the maneuverability conferred by AS to produce proteins that contribute to growth and survival. In our previous studies, we identified that amiloride modulates AS in cancer cells. However, the effective concentration of amiloride required to modulate AS is too high for use in cancer treatment. In this study, we used computational algorithms to screen potential amiloride derivatives for their ability to regulate AS in cancer cells. We found that 3,5‐diamino‐6‐chloro‐N‐(N‐(2,6‐dichlorobenzoyl)carbamimidoyl)pyrazine‐2‐carboxamide (BS008) can regulate AS of apoptotic gene transcripts, including HIPK3, SMAC, and BCL‐X, at a lower concentration than amiloride. This splicing regulation involved various splicing factors, and it was accompanied by a change in the phosphorylation state of serine/arginine‐rich proteins (SR proteins). RNA sequencing was performed to reveal that AS of many other apoptotic gene transcripts, such as AATF, ATM, AIFM1, NFKB1, and API5, was also modulated by BS008. In vivo experiments further indicated that treatment of tumor‐bearing mice with BS008 resulted in a marked decrease in tumor size. BS008 also had inhibitory effects in vitro, either alone or in a synergistic combination with the cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents sorafenib and nilotinib. BS008 enabled sorafenib dose reduction without compromising antitumor activity. These findings suggest that BS008 may possess therapeutic potential for cancer treatment.

Initial and maintenance dose of sorafenib in female patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma should be modified to maximize therapeutic effect.

497 Background: Sorafenib is the only approved first-line agent in patients with advanced HCC and patients who showed progressive disease after sorafenib therapy have an opportunity to receive regorafeib as 2nd-line agent. Therefore, it is very important to maintain sorafenib therapy until sorafenib resistance occurs. We retrospectively analyzed initial and maintenance dose especially in female patients. Methods: A total of 232 patients with advanced HCC who received sorafenib in our institution from July, 2009 until May, 2017 were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), radiological response evaluated by modified RECIST criteria and dose of sorafenib were analyzed. Results: The 232 patients included 179 males and 53 females, with a mean age of 71 ± 9 years. The majority of patients (N = 131, 56.4%) were HCV Ab positive and HBs Ag was positive in 29 patients. Eighty-six patients had extrahepatic metastasis and 50 patients showed major portal invasion defined as VP3 or VP4 by Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The overall survival rates of the 232 patients at 6, 12 and 18 were 72.4%, 53.6% and 41.9%, and MST was 14 months. In all patients no existence of major portal invasion, serum Albumin level ≧3.5g/dl before administration of sorafenib, and post-sorafenib anticancer therapy were independently associated with OS. The mean age of female patients was 75 years and mean body weight was 49kg. In female patients only 5 patients (9.4%) showed over 60kg. The dose reduction of sorafenib was necessary in all female patients and 26 female patients could receive post-sorafenib anticancer therapy including regorafenib. The muscle mass calculated by direct segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis method was associated with duration of sorafenib therapy, dose reduction of sorafenib and possibility of post-sorafenib anticancer therapy. Conclusions: The modification of sorafenib dose according to sex and muscle mass is clinically important to improve overall survival in patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib. It is associated with duration of sorafenib therapy and the possibility for induction of other therapies after sorafenib failure.

Prognostic factors of sorafenib therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with failure of transarterial chemoembolization.

There is no approved therapy for patients with failed transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and prognostic factors in patients with TACE failure who received sorafenib rescue therapy. We investigated 54 patients who met the criteria of TACE failure as defined by the international guidelines of Europe and Japan. Sorafenib was used as a rescue therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods, and multivariate analysis was performed to find prognostic factors. The patients were followed for a median 5.5months, and the median duration of sorafenib administration was 3.3months. The presence of main (or lobar) portal vein invasion (PVI) (3.7 versus 8.4months, p=0.004), dose reduction of sorafenib (4.0 versus 8.8months, p=0.002) and Child-Pugh class B (5.3 versus 8.9months, p=0.004) were associated with shorter OS compared to the presence of segmental PVI (or absence of macroscopic vascular invasion, MVI), full dosage of sorafenib and Child-Pugh class A, respectively. The presence of main (or lobar) PVI was associated with poorer PFS compared to the presence of segmental PVI (or absence of MVI) (2.1 versus 3.8months p=0.010). Sorafenib is a potential rescue therapy in patients with TACE failure. However, the clinical benefits need to be further evaluated for patients with main (or lobar) PVI or those treated with reduced doses of sorafenib.

The analysis of the long-term outcomes of sorafenib therapy in routine practice in imatinib and sunitinib resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

Aim of the studywas to analyze the outcome of treatment and factors predicting results of sorafenib therapy in inoperable/metastatic CD117-positive GIST patients after failure on imatinib and sunitinib.Material and methodsWe identified 60 consecutive patients (40 men, 20 women) with advanced inoperable/metastatic GIST after failure on at least imatinib and sunitinib treated in one sarcoma center with sorafenib at initial dose 2 × 400 mg daily in 2007–2015 (in 56 cases it was 3rd line therapy). Median follow-up time was 39 months.ResultsOne year progression-free survival (PFS; calculated from the date of the start of sorafenib to disease progression) rate was 23% and median PFS = 7.7 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.5 months calculated from sorafenib start (1-year OS rate = 57%) and 7 years from imatinib start. Three patients (5%) had objective partial responses to therapy, 31 patients (52%) had stabilization of disease > 4 months. Primary tumor mutational status was known in 43 cases (73%), but we have not identified the differences in PFS between tumors carrying different KIT/PDGFRA mutations. The most common adverse events were: diarrhoea, hand and foot syndrome, fatigue, loss of weight and skin reactions; grade 3–5 toxicity occurred in 35% of patients. 23 patients required sorafenib dose reductions due to AEs.ConclusionsWe confirmed that many advanced GIST patients benefit from sorafenib therapy after imatinib/sunitinib failure with OS > 1 year.

Inducing tolerability of adverse events increases sorafenib exposure and optimizes patient's outcome in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Various grades of adverse events are associated with sorafenib and have recently been considered as a surrogate of response in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this prospective study was to measure the efficacy of a sorafenib dose reduction regimen, adjusted on patient's tolerability, and aimed at increasing the exposure to the drug. A total of 73/140 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib developed relevant adverse events (grade ≥2) and were managed with a tolerable-adverse-event-protocol consisting of a drug stepwise dose reduction adjusted on patient's tolerability. The remaining 67 patients with toxicity grade 0-1 (minor adverse event group) were managed conventionally with just symptomatic treatment. Median follow-up was 7 months. By adopting the tolerable-adverse-event-protocol, 48% of patients meant to transiently or definitively interrupt the drug were kept on treatment. Macrovascular invasion with/out extra-hepatic spread (HR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.8; P = 0.001) and sorafenib exposure <2 months (HR = 4, 95% CI: 2.5-6.4; P < 0.0001) were independently related to a worse survival. Overall disease control rate, time to progression and survival were: 63.5%, 6 and 9.1 months respectively. The tolerable-adverse-event-protocol group experienced a more favourable outcome with respect to the minor adverse event group as for disease control rate (78% vs. 48%: P < 0.0001), time to progression (9.5 vs. 3 months; HR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2-0.5, P < 0.0001) and survival (12.5 vs. 5.7 months; HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3-0.6; P < 0.0001). In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, sorafenib dose adjustments based on inducing tolerability of relevant adverse events prolong drug exposure and maximize survival.

2402 Sorafenib (SOR) dose reduction attenuates its immunosuppressive effects and delays hepatocellular cancer (HCC) development in the woodchuck model of hepatitis B related HCC

2402 Sorafenib (SOR) dose reduction attenuates its immunosuppressive effects and delays hepatocellular cancer (HCC) development in the woodchuck model of hepatitis B related HCC

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in the prevention and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrences after liver transplantation

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in the prevention and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relapse after liver transplantation. A retrospective cohort study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib for HCC. Forty-four patients who underwent liver transplant for HCC beyond Milan criteria form July 2007 to May 2010 were included study group (sorafenib, n = 22) and control group (without sorafenib, n = 22). The primary endpoints of the study were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included the rates of acute rejection and graft survival. The clinical data of 44 patients were completely collected. There were significantly differences between sorafenib group and control group in 1-year DFS (81.8% (n = 18) vs 63.6% (n = 14), P < 0.05) and OS (90.9% (n = 20) vs 72.7% (n = 16), P < 0.05) respectively. The acute rejection rates in Sorafenib were 13.6% (3/22), compared with 18.2% (4/22) in control group (P = 0.524) and 1-year graft survival in Sorafenib group were 86.4% (19/22), compared with 72.7% (16/22) in control group (P = 0.086). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 68.1% (n = 15) in sorafenib group and 31.8% (n = 7) in the control group (P < 0.01). Adverse events that were reported for patients receiving sorafenib were predominantly grade 1 or 2 in severity including diarrhea (45.5%, n = 10), liver dysfunction (40.9%, n = 9), hand-foot skin reaction (31.8%, n = 7) and pains of head and four limbs (22.7%, n = 5). Two patients with grade 3 adverse events in study group were stopped continuing to use the sorafenib. Three patients with the dose of 400 mg twice daily and 17 patients with the dose reduction of sorafenib continued to the study endpoint. Patients with HCC undergoing liver transplantation could get the benefits of Sorafenib in reducing the incidence of tumor recurrence and extending disease-free and overall survival time.

Skeletal muscle depletion predicts the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

The aim of this study was to determine whether skeletal muscle depletion predicts the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is being treated with sorafenib. We evaluated 40 consecutive HCC patients who received sorafenib treatment. The skeletal muscle cross-sectional area was measured by computed tomography at the third lumbar vertebra (L3), from which the L3 skeletal muscle index (L3 SMI) was obtained. The factors contributing to overall survival, sorafenib dose reduction, and discontinuation of sorafenib were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. L3 SMI (p = 0.020) and log (α-fetoprotein (AFP)) (p = 0.010) were identified as independent prognostic factors in HCC patients treated with sorafenib. The initial dose of sorafenib (p = 0.008) was an independent risk factor for sorafenib dose reduction, and log (AFP) (p = 0.008) was the only significant risk factor for the discontinuation of this drug. L3 SMI was not a risk factor for either dose reduction (p = 0.423) or the discontinuation (p = 0.132) of sorafenib. A multiple linear regression analysis determined the following relationship between skeletal muscle mass (assessed as L3 SMI) and the explanatory factors: L3 SMI = −0.1896 × (Age) − 10.3441 × (Child-Pugh score) − 9.3922 × (log (AFP)) + 1.6139 × (log (AFP)) × (Child-Pugh score) + 112.9166. Skeletal muscle depletion is inversely associated with age, Child-Pugh score, and log (AFP). Moreover, it is an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients treated with sorafenib.

Synergistic anti-proliferative effect of metformin and sorafenib on growth of anaplastic thyroid cancer cells and their stem cells.

Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor has recently been approved for the treatment of radio-iodine refractory thyroid carcinoma. However, toxic side effects may lead to dose reduction. In the present study, we analyzed whether a combined therapy with metformin may allow a dose reduction of sorafenib without loss of effectiveness at the same time. In HTh74 anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) cells and its derived doxorubicin-resistant HTh74Rdox cell line, the growth inhibitory effect of sorafenib with or without metformin was investigated. Furthermore, an analysis of cell cycle arrest in response to sorafenib was performed and the ability of a combined treatment to induce apoptosis was analyzed. In addition, the effects on clonal growth and formation of stem cell-derived spheres were assayed. The influence of sorafenib and metformin on MAP kinase pathway was investigated by analysis of ERK phosphorylation. Sorafenib and metformin synergistically inhibited growth of the two thyroid cancer cell lines, with a more pronounced effect on the doxorubicin-resistant HTh74Rdox cell line. The two drugs also synergistically decreased sphere formation, which suggested a specific effect on thyroid cancer stem cells. The addition of metformin enabled a 25% dose reduction of sorafenib without loss of its growth inhibitory efficacy. Sorafenib and metformin synergistically decreased the proliferation of ATC cell lines and the outgrowth of their derived cancer stem cells. A combined treatment enabled a significant dose reduction of sorafenib. In respect to frequent toxic side effects, clinical studies in future should demonstrate whether the addition of metformin may be an advantage in the chemotherapy of patients with radio-iodine‑resistant thyroid cancer.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Prophylactic Effect of Urea-Based Cream on Sorafenib-Associated Hand-Foot Skin Reactions in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To assess whether urea-based cream (UBC) has prophylactic benefits on sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this randomized, open-label trial, 871 patients with advanced HCC throughout China were treated with 10% UBC three times per day plus best supportive care (BSC; n = 439) or BSC alone excluding all creams (n = 432), starting on day 1 of sorafenib treatment, for up to 12 weeks. HFSR was assessed every 2 weeks and at 14 weeks for patients completing the study. Once HFSR occurred, patients were allowed any cream, including a UBC. The 12-week incidence of any grade HFSR was significantly lower in the UBC group versus the BSC-alone group (56.0% v 73.6%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.457; 95% CI, 0.344 to 0.608; P < .001), as was the incidence of grade ≥ 2 HFSR (20.7% v 29.2%, respectively; OR, 0.635; 95% CI, 0.466 to 0.866; P = .004). Median time to first occurrence of HFSR was significantly longer in the UBC group than the BSC-alone group (84 v 34 days, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.658; 95% CI, 0.541 to 0.799; P < .001). Elevated AST was associated with increased risk of HFSR but did not alter the treatment effect of UBC. UBC plus BSC, compared with BSC alone, did not affect the sorafenib dose reduction or interruption rate (9.1% v 11.8%, respectively; P = .1937), response rate (11.1% v 10.1%, respectively; P = .6674), or disease control rate (98.8% v 98.2%, respectively; P = .5350) at week 12. UBC prophylaxis in patients with advanced HCC starting sorafenib reduced HFSR rates, extended the time to first occurrence of HFSR, and improved patient quality of life compared with BSC. Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to determine the role of UBC on the incidence and severity of HFSR are warranted.

Hypertension among patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving axitinib or sorafenib: analysis from the randomized phase III AXIS trial

Inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway frequently induce hypertension when used to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This analysis characterizes hypertension and hypertension-related events in patients treated with the VEGF pathway inhibitors axitinib or sorafenib in the AXIS trial. AXIS was a randomized phase III study of axitinib versus sorafenib in patients with metastatic RCC following failure of one prior systemic regimen. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were excluded, but patients with hypertension controlled with antihypertensive medication were allowed to participate. Guidelines for hypertension management included adjustment or addition of antihypertensive medications and/or axitinib or sorafenib dose reductions, interruptions, or discontinuations. Treatment-emergent all-causality hypertension occurred in 145 (40.4 %) axitinib-treated patients (N = 359) and 103 (29.0 %) sorafenib-treated patients (N = 355), with grade 3 hypertension reported in 55 (15.3 %) and 38 (10.7 %) patients, respectively, and grade 4 hypertension reported in one (0.3 %) patient in each arm. Hypertension-related events led to axitinib dose interruptions (n = 46; 12.8 %), dose reductions (n = 16; 4.5 %), or discontinuations (n = 1; 0.3 %). Approximately 50 % of axitinib-treated patients with grade 3 or 4 hypertension continued treatment for ≥ 9 months. Hypertension-related sequelae occurred in <1 % of axitinib-treated patients. Hypertension was more frequently observed during treatment with axitinib than sorafenib in patients with RCC, but axitinib-induced hypertension rarely led to treatment discontinuation or cardiovascular sequelae. Recommendations for monitoring blood pressure and managing hypertension during axitinib therapy are presented.

Management of Common Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Sorafenib: Nurse and Pharmacist Perspective

Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sorafenib is currently being evaluated in phase II and III trials in various malignancies as a single agent (locally advanced/metastatic radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer [DTC]), as part of multimodality care (HCC), and in combination with chemotherapies (metastatic breast cancer). Grade 1 and 2 adverse events (AEs) that commonly occur during treatment (ie, dermatologic manifestations, diarrhea, fatigue, and hypertension) should be proactively managed. The goal is to allow patients to remain on their full dose of sorafenib for as long as their treatment is indicated. A combination of early recognition of and intervention for AEs, patient education, and an open dialogue between patients and their multidisciplinary healthcare team, with timely reporting of AEs, will allow for effective management of AEs and minimize the need for sorafenib dose reduction or discontinuation.

A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib monotherapy in clinically selected patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy (Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, CTONG 0805)

ObjectivesAim of the study was to investigate efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy. Patients and methodsPatients who were diagnosed with stage IIIB or stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, and benefited from one prior EGFR-TKI therapy and then failed, were eligible. No more than one previous chemotherapy regimen was permitted. Patients received oral sorafenib 400mg twice daily continuously until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). For patients who agreed to provide peripheral blood or tumor tissue, we analyzed the genotype of Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM) deletion polymorphism and EGFR mutation status. ResultsOf 65 enrolled patients, 64 were evaluable. The DCR was 32.8%, which did not meet the predefined statistical hypothesis of 38.4%. The median PFS and OS were 3.7 months [95% (confidence interval), 3.5–3.9 months] and 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.7–9.2 months), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed no correlation between DCR and age, gender, smoking status and performance status. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was the predominant toxicity occurring in 71.9% of patients. Fourteen patients (21.9%) had ≥grade 2 dermatologic reactions that resulted sorafenib dose reduction in three patients (4.7%). Of 36 patients, the BIM deletion polymorphism was found in 3, and no response to sorafenib was observed. In 30 tumor tissues, 22 EGFR active mutations were found. The DCR had no significant difference between mutation-positive and wild-type patients (31.8% vs. 42.9%, respectively; HR, 0.622; p=0.665). ConclusionSorafenib monotherapy did not achieve positive result in patients defined in our trial and we need better biomarker to determine the population who can benefit from sorafenib treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00922584).

Sorafenib treatment is save and may affect survival of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) is a rare but challenging condition. In most cases, the recurrent tumor is presented with extrahepatic spread. Therefore, systemic treatment with sorafenib has to be assessed. Because of a plethora of possible drug interactions, e.g., with immunosuppressant or anti-infective therapy, safety and feasibility of sorafenib treatment requires special attention. We retrospectively analyzed 18 patients who suffered from recurrent advanced HCC after LT between January 2002 and December 2010 at the University Hospital Heidelberg regarding safety of sorafenib treatment and survival. Results showed that 8 patients were eligible for treatment with sorafenib showing a median time to progression (TTP) of 4.5 months and an overall survival of 9 months. Most common side effects were grades I and II diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) which could be managed by sorafenib dose reduction. No grade III or IV adverse events (AEs) were noticed. No patient had to discontinue treatment due to AEs. The ten patients not amenable for sorafenib treatment, due to initial poor performance status or its deterioration after first line treatment, were treated with surgical resection (n = 3), locoregional therapies (n = 1), or palliative radiation therapy (n = 1). They showed a median overall survival of 2.3 months. Sorafenib may represent a therapeutic option for recurrent HCC after LT with manageable side effects. The clinical benefit of sorafenib in this setting is promising but needs to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.