Ustekinumab Dose Research Articles

Model-Informed Precision Dosing for Personalized Ustekinumab Treatment in Plaque Psoriasis.

Implementing model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) strategies guided by population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models could enhance the management of inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis. However, the extent of individual experimental data gathered during MIPD significantly influences the uncertainty in estimating individual PK/PD parameters, affecting clinical dose selection decisions. This study proposes a methodology to individualize ustekinumab (UTK) dosing strategies for 23 Spanish patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis., considering the uncertainty of individual parameters within a population PK/PD model. An indirect response model from previous research was used to describe the PK/PD relationship between UTK serum concentrations and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. A maximum inhibition drug effect (Imax) model was selected, and a first-order remission constant rate of psoriatic skin lesion (kout = 0.016 d-1) was estimated. The MIPD approach predicted that 35% and 26% of the patients would need an optimized and intensified dosage regimen, respectively, compared to the regimen typically used in clinical practice. This analysis demonstrated its utility as a tool for selecting personalized UTK dosing regimens in clinical practice in order to optimize the probability of achieving targeted clinical outcomes in patients with psoriasis.

Long-term benefit of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis in clinical practice: ULISES study.

Ustekinumab is approved for ulcerative colitis (UC). To assess the durability of ustekinumab in patients with UC and its short-term effectiveness, durability and tolerability in clinical practice. Retrospective, multicentre study of patients who had received their first ustekinumab dose at least 16 weeks before inclusion. Patients were followed until treatment discontinuation or last visit. Only patients with active disease at the start of ustekinumab treatment were considered in the effectiveness analysis. Patients who stopped ustekinumab before their last visit were considered not to be in subsequent remission. We included 620 patients; 155 (25%) discontinued ustekinumab during follow-up (median 12 months). Rate of discontinuation was 20% per patient-year of follow-up. Anaemia at baseline (hazard ratio, HR 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.1), steroids at baseline (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.06-2.08) and more severe clinical activity at baseline (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.09-2.06) were associated with higher risk of discontinuation. At the end of induction, 226 (40%) patients were in steroid-free clinical remission. Moderate-severe vs mild disease activity at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5), male sex (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.8), and increased number of previous biologics (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.6-0.8) were associated with lower likelihood of steroid-free clinical remission at week 16. One hundred and seventy-six patients (28%) had at least one adverse event. We observed no negative impact of ustekinumab on extraintestinal manifestations and/or immune-mediated diseases. Ustekinumab durability in UC was relatively high, and treatment was effective in highly refractory patients. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies.

A High Visceral-to-Skeletal Muscle Area Ratio on Cross-Sectional Imaging Is Associated With Failure of Standard Ustekinumab Doses: A Multicenter Study.

Anti-interleukin 12/23 agents have shown greater durability in response compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents. Data on the association between body composition (BC) or body mass index (BMI) and ustekinumab's therapeutic response is limited. We aimed to evaluate the impact of BC on time to failing standard doses of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Patients with CD aged 16 years and older from 2 tertiary centers were studied retrospectively. Included patients had abdominal imaging within 6 months of ustekinumab induction and were followed until April 30, 2022. An experienced abdominal radiologist blinded to the clinical information measured the area of visceral fat area and skeletal muscle area at the mid L3 vertebral level, with values corrected for height 2 to derive respective indices (visceral fat index [VFI], skeletal muscle index [SMI]) and the VFI:SMI ratio. Ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age at ustekinumab induction was 46.6 (±1.6) years. The median BMI (interquartile range) was 26.5 (22.6-30.8). Twenty-four patients (24.2%) did not respond or lost response to standard doses of ustekinumab over the follow-up duration. A younger age (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99, P = 0.01) and a VFI:SMI ratio >1.6 (hazard ratio 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.73-12.45, P = 0.002) were both associated with a shorter time to failing ustekinumab at standard doses on multivariate analysis. BMI, notably, had no association with the primary outcome. A high VFI:SMI ratio is associated with an increased risk of failing standard doses of ustekinumab. BC measurements derived from cross-sectional imaging at the start of ustekinumab therapy is a useful indicator for therapeutic durability.

Long-term effectiveness and persistence rate of ustekinumab dose intensification in a South East Asian inflammatory bowel disease center.

Ustekinumab (UST) is an effective biologic for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, some patients treated with UST have suboptimal clinical response with standard dosing. The aims of this study were to determine the effectiveness of UST dose intensification (DI), identify factors associated with DI, cumulative incidence of DI and persistence of UST among treated patients. Clinical data of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) who received UST from September 2017 to October 2022 in Singapore General Hospital were collected. Primary outcome was defined as achieving corticosteroid-free clinical remission, biochemical remission, endoscopic healing and/or transmural healing (CD). Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors, which are predictive of UST DI and effectiveness of UST DI. Forty-two patients (34 CD and 8 UC) underwent UST DI to either 6-weekly (n=19, 45.2%) or 4-weekly (n=23, 35.9%) and the median time to intensification was 31.1weeks (17.8-65.7). Presence of perianal disease in CD (HR 4.9; 1.47-16.4) was associated with DI. After DI, 16 (38%) patients achieved primary outcome by week 52. The overall drug persistence rates at 1year and 2years were 75.7% (95% CI 62.9-84.6) and 63.5% (95% CI 49.9-74.3), respectively. Two third of IBD patients underwent DI while on UST treatment and the median time to DI was about 6months after induction. CD patients with perianal disease is more likely to undergo DI. More than one third of dose-intensified patients achieved remission by week 52.

Ustekinumab in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease: safety, and efficacy results from a multicenter retrospective study in China.

Ustekinumab (UST) is approved as an effective therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) in adults. Off-label use is increasing in the pediatric population, more data on safety and efficacy in pediatric patients with CD is urgently needed. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of UST in children and adolescents with Crohn's disease. This multicenter retrospective study carried out at three tertiary care centers, and identified children who received their first dose of UST at 18 years old or younger and followed up for a minimum of 24 weeks. Data on demographics, disease behavior, location and activity, treatment history were collected. The primary outcomes were clinical remission at weeks 24-32 and weeks 48-56 of UST therapy. Secondary outcomes were clinical response at the same time points, endoscopic remission, changes in C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), albumin and fecal calprotectin, improvement in growth parameters, and rate of adverse events. Sixteen patients were included, and 11/13 (84.6%) continued to receive UST after 1 year. Our data demonstrate that the clinical remission rates were 41.7% at weeks 24∼32 with the Weighted pediatric CD activity index (wPCDAI) was lower than baseline (43.8, IQR: 31.3-51.9 vs.15, IQR: 5.6-25, p < 0.001) and 75% at weeks 48-56 with wPCDAI was lower than baseline (42.5, IQR: 23.8-50 vs. 7.5, IQR: 0-13.8, p = 0.004). Five of eleven children achieved endoscopic remission. No serious adverse events were recorded during the study period. UST is efficacious and safe in pediatric patients with CD. Pediatric patients could benefit from UST as either a primary or secondary biologic therapy for the induction, or maintenance of remission of CD.

Rates, Predictors, and Outcomes of Ustekinumab Dose Escalation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Ustekinumab (UST) is effective for the induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a significant proportion of patients will require UST dose escalation. We sought to determine the rates, predictors, and outcomes of UST dose escalation in patients with IBD. This was a multicenter, retrospective study of all patients with IBD who received UST from January 1, 2014 to March 1, 2022. Primary outcomes were the rates and predictors of UST dose escalation. Secondary outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission, endoscopic healing, and normalization of serum c-reactive protein in patients who underwent UST dose escalation. A total of 198 patients were included (58% females and 76.7% with Crohn's disease). UST dose was escalated by 55.5% (n = 110). Mean baseline albumin was lower in the UST dose escalation group at 3.86 ± 0.47 versus 4.03 ± 0.45g/dL (P = 0.044). The mean hemoglobin was lower in the UST dose escalation group at 12.1 ± 1.83 versus 12.7 ± 1.42 (P = 0.049). On multivariate analysis, male sex alone was associated with the need for dose escalation (odds ratio: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.20 - 13.90; P = 0.025). In the UST dose escalation group, 66.1% achieved steroid-free clinical remission, 55.8% had normalization of c-reactive protein, and 35.8% achieved endoscopic healing. UST dose escalation was needed in more than half of patients with IBD in this real-world cohort. UST dose escalation resulted in clinical remission in more than half of the cohort and endoscopic healing in one-third of patients.

Leukopenia that successfully treated by Ustekinumab in patient with psoriatic arthritis

Introduction:Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is an immune-mediated disease. The effectiveness of biologics has changed therapeutic strategies for psoriasis. We report a case of leukopenia in a patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who was treated with Ustekinumab. Case presentation: A 36- year- old Syrian female presented for a follow up concerning treatment of psoriatic arthritis. She was diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis according to the CASPAR criteria. She was treated with Methotrexate, then Sulfasalazine. On presentation, the physical examination revealed tender in metacarpals, proximal interphalengal joints and distal interphalengal joints of both hands. Laboratory analysis showed: white blood cells (WBC) :3500 /mm3, (Neut:23% n = 40-65%, Lymp:65% n= 25-40%), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR): 40 mm/h1, and C-reactive protein (CRP): 9.3 mg/L . Given the patient’s ongoing disease activity, and the presence of leukopenia, we started with Ustekinumab 45 mg subcutaneous. After the third dose of Ustekinumab, evaluation showed improvement in her peripheral arthritis and normal laboratory findings. Discussion: Patients with psoriasis had higher total white blood cell and neutrophil. Ustekinumab has good efficacy against disease activity as well as a favourable safety profile. In literature, we found a case of myelodysplastic syndrome associated with inflammatory bowel disease treated with Ustekinumab. Another case of constitutional neutropenia and psoriasis vulgaris treated with Ustekinumab. Conclusion: This is the first case of leukopenia associated with PsA successfully treated with Ustekinumab. UST treatment might be recommended for leukopenia associated with PsA, but further researches are recommended.

Safety of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Safety Analysis Through 5 Years in Crohn's Disease and 4 Years in Ulcerative Colitis.

Previously published long-term safety data reported a favourable ustekinumab safety profile for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. We present the final cumulative safety data from pooled ustekinumab IBD phase 2/3 clinical studies through 5 years in Crohn's disease [CD] and 4 years in ulcerative colitis [UC]. In phase 3 studies, patients received a single intravenous placebo or ustekinumab [130 mg or ~6 mg/kg] induction dose followed by subcutaneous maintenance doses of placebo or ustekinumab [90 mg q8w or q12w]. Analyses included all patients who received one dose of study treatment and included patients who were biologic-naïve and patients with a history of biologic failure. Safety outcomes are summarized and presented using number of events per 100 patient-years of follow-up and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. In this final pooled safety analysis, 2575 patients were treated with ustekinumab with 4826 patient-years of follow-up. Rates of key safety events, including major adverse cardiac events and malignancies, were similar between placebo and ustekinumab or not higher for ustekinumab. Opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis, and malignancies were reported infrequently. Rates of key safety events in the IBD group were no higher in the ustekinumab group than in the placebo group for both patients who were biologic-naïve or who had a history of biologic failure. No lymphomas or cases of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome [formerly known as reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome] were reported. The final cumulative ustekinumab safety data through 5 years in CD and 4 years in UC demonstrated favourable safety compared to placebo and continue to support the well-established safety profile across all approved indications. NCT00265122, NCT00771667, NCT01369329, NCT01369342, NCT01369355, NCT02407236.

REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS OF USTEKINUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Abstract BACKGROUND Primary treatment goals for ulcerative colitis (UC) are to induce and maintain long-term disease remission and reduce the prevalence of symptoms such as bowel urgency and abdominal pain. Ustekinumab (UST) is a biologic approved for treating adult patients with moderate-severe UC, but real-world effectiveness data remain limited. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess real-world effectiveness of UST in patients with UC. METHODS Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World UC Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection of gastroenterologists and their patients in the United States of America (USA) from December 2022–September 2023. Two samples were utilised; a sample where physicians provided data for their next six consecutive patients with UC, and an oversample where physicians provided data for their next four consulting patients with UC receiving UST. Patients receiving UST for &amp;gt;1 day at time of consultation (assumed to have received ≥1 UST dose) from either sample were included in the analysis. Data collected included clinical status, disease duration and location, symptoms and treatment profiles. Remission defined by Mayo score was reported separately for advanced therapy (AT)-naïve (UST received as first AT) and AT-experienced (UST received as second or later line of AT) patients. Descriptive statistics for each variable were reported for patients with known data. McNemar’s test was used for symptom prevalence and disease severity comparisons. RESULTS Data for 160 patients were included in this study from 50 physicians. Patients had been diagnosed with UC for median (interquartile range; IQR) of 2.2 (0.5, 4.5) years; mean (standard deviation) age was 39.7 (13.0) years and 50.0% of patients were male. UST was received as first AT for 68.1% of patients, second AT for 18.1% and third AT for 11.3%. Median (IQR) time on UST was 8.7 (4.1, 18.6) months, with 83.9% of patients receiving UST for ≥3 months. For patients in maintenance phase of treatment, 65.8% were on UST USA label dose, 17.9% were receiving an increased and 16.3% decreased dose. According to Mayo scores, 53.6% of AT-naïve and 58.3% of AT-experienced patients were in remission at consultation (Table 1). Improvement in disease severity was evidenced by a reduced proportion of patients with moderate/severe disease at consultation (34.4%) compared to prior to initiation of UST (90.9%; p&amp;lt;0.01). Similarly, there was a significantly lower prevalence of all symptoms between UST initiation and consultation, including abdominal pain (72.1% vs 30.2%), bowel urgency (55.1% vs 22.0%) and bloody diarrhea (54.4% vs 17.6%) (all p&amp;lt;0.01; Figure 1). CONCLUSION Our study showed real-world effectiveness of UST in patients with UC in the USA; most patients receiving UST achieved remission and demonstrated reduced prevalence of symptoms following UST initiation. Table 1 Physician-reported characteristics of patients receiving ustekinumab at the time of consultation. Figure 1 Physician-reported prevalence of (A) symptoms and (B) moderate/severe disease severity prior to initiation of ustekinumab and at time of consultation.

P605 Intravenous Ustekinumab maintenance treatment is effective in patients with Crohn’s Disease

Abstract Background With the usual subcutaneous (SC) doses (90 mg every 8-12 weeks) of Ustekinumab some patients will only partially respond or experience secondary loss of response. Intravenous (IV) dose of Ustekinumab is more affordable than the subcutaneous does in China. However, the evidence of intravenous administration maintenance when shortening subcutaneous dose is not effective enough is limited. Methods We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IV Ustekinumab in patients with Crohn´s disease (CD). Patients received Ustekinumab with insufficient efficacy or loss of response to 90 mg SC treatment could escalate to IV maintenance at regular intervals through every clinic visit and could deescalate back to SC maintenance when the efficacy is satisfied. We obtained data from 247 patients. Results Follow-up data beyond 24 weeks (24w) were available for 229 patients and data beyond 52 weeks (52w) were available for 144. Baseline characteristics of the included patients are shown in Table 1. Complicated forms (B2-B3; 55.6%) predominated and perianal disease was present in 45.3% of patients. 136(58.12%) patients were naïve to biological treatments, 41.8% had received at one and 8.97% more than 2. Steroid-free clinical remission were observed in 88.1%(185/210) patients at 24 weeks.35/104(33.65%) had a normal level of fecal calprotectin(FCP) and 56/115(48.70%) achieved endoscopic remission at 52 weeks. Serious adverse events were reported in 0.81% of patients. Logistic regression demonstrated that 24w C-reactive protein, baseline FCP and frequency of IV treatment were associated with endoscopic remission at 52w (Figure 1). Conclusion Patients who lose response to the intensified dose of Ustekinumab SC could benefit from intravenous administration as maintenance treatment.

P804 Does Crohn's disease extent and behavior have an impact on ustekinumab effectiveness? A real-world multicenter retrospective study

Abstract Background Crohn's disease (CD) presents heterogeneity in clinical phenotypes. Progression of disease and response to therapy have been associated, among other factors, with the extent and behavior of the disease. Real-world data on long term effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) in CD based on disease characteristics are limited and conflicting1,2. The aim of this study is to describe real-world UST persistence according to disease distribution and perianal involvement in patients with CD. Methods This was a retrospective multicenter study involving adult patients with CD who received, at least, one dose of UST until August 2023, at 5 major hospitals in Athens, Greece. UST effectiveness based on treatment persistence was evaluated using Kaplan Meier curves for survival free of treatment discontinuation among patients with different disease extent and behavior. Log-rank test was used for statistical significance. Results A total of 147 adult CD patients who received biological treatment with UST for a median of 34 months (IQR 17-48) were included in the study. Patient baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. UST treatment persistence rates were 93% (95% CI: 89-98) at 12 months and 87% (95% CI: 81-94) at 36 months. The persistence rate of UST differed significantly between patients with or without perianal disease (p=0.036) (Figure 1), while there was no significant difference based on disease extent (p=0.59) or behavior (p=0.31). Conclusion Our study showed that UST treatment persistence is similar in adult patients with CD, regardless of disease localization or behavior. Nonetheless, perianal disease involvement is associated with reduced treatment persistence.

P944 Ustekinumab in refractory Ulcerative Colitis: single-center, real-world experience

Abstract Background Ustekinumab, an anti-interleukin 12/23 agent, was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2019 as a treatment for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Limited real-world data is available regarding the utilization of ustekinumab in UC, particularly medication persistence and escalation, which are indicators of medication performance in real-world settings. Our aim was to describe our experience with ustekinumab in refractory UC patients. Methods This was an observational single-center study on UC patients who received at least one intravenous dose of ustekinumab 16 weeks before data analysis due to active UC (Simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI)&amp;gt;5). Data regarding disease activity prior to and post-induction were analyzed. Patients were followed up until the last ustekinumab administration. Clinical response to therapy was assessed at 16, 24,52 weeks, and the end of follow-up. Response was defined as SCCAI&amp;lt;4, and remission as SCCAI≤2. Dose adjustment or IV maintenance was considered part of the treatment regimen. Patients who discontinued ustekinumab due to lack of therapeutic effect or worsening of UC were considered failures. When available, colonoscopy data was analyzed. Results Forty-seven patients who received ustekinumab for refractory UC were included. Thirty-eight percent were female, and 34% were former smokers. Median age was 46 [37.5-61.5]; 62% had extensive disease, and 15% had perianal disease. Ninety-three percent received at least one biologic before ustekinumab, and 24% had received a JAK inhibitor. Thirty-eight patients required dose escalation, and 11 were on maintenance IV. Clinical response at week 16 was achieved in 74% and remission in 46%. At 24 and 52 weeks, 65% and 61% were in remission, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 59% of patients had endoscopic remission (Endoscopic Mayo score ≤ 1). Sixty percent continued treatment during a mean follow-up of 12 months [6-21]. No variable was associated with risk of discontinuation. No serious adverse events were reported. Discontinuation of treatment was due to treatment failure in all cases. Conclusion Ustekinumab was effective for induction and maintenance in our cohort of UC patients, although a significant proportion required dose escalation. Drug persistence was higher than 50% during the follow-up. The safety profile of ustekinumab was similar to that in controlled studies and other real-world studies.

P673 Accelerated intravenous ustekinumab dosing as rescue therapy in Moderate- Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is an accepted treatment for patients with moderate- severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) following failure with corticosteroids and/or anti-TNF. Some studies suggest that intravenous (IV) administration, in an accelerated schedule, could improve outcomes in this difficult-to-manage group with a high risk of colectomy. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis in patients with moderate-severe UC who received UST (IV) as rescue treatment, following failure with corticosteroids and infliximab. UST was administered intravenously, with an initial dose of 6mg/Kg followed by 130mg every four weeks. Clinical activity was determined by the Partial Mayo Score (PMS), and endoscopic activity by the Mayo Score (SM). Clinical Remission (CR) was defined as PMS&amp;lt;2, and Clinical Response (CRp) as a reduction in activity of ≥30%. Results The study included 17 patients, 8 (47%) women, 9 (52.9%) of whom were hospitalized at baseline, and 11/17 required transfusion or intravenous iron. According to PMS, clinical activity was severe in 16 (94.12%) and moderate in one. Endoscopic activity according to SM was severe in 13 (76.4%). Clinical remission and response were as follows: 1 (5.8%) / 7 (41.1%) patients respectively at week 4; 8 (47%) / 16 (94.1%) patients at week 12; and at week 26, 15 patients had completed the study, 10 (66.6%) in CR, and 12 (80%) in CRp. Ustekinumab was withdrawn in one case due to an infusion reaction, and one patient underwent colectomy. No independent predictors of response to UST were found in this study. Conclusion Intravenous ustekinumab in an accelerated dosing schedule is effective in moderate-severe UC, achieving clinical response in more than two-thirds of patients at week 26.

DOP74 Short and long-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in Ulcerative Colitis in real life: the ULISES study

Abstract Background Primary aim: To assess the durability of ustekinumab treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Secondary aims: To assess the short-term effectiveness, the durability of response, and the tolerability of ustekinumab in clinical practice. Methods Retrospective, multicenter study including UC patients who had received the 1st ustekinumab dose at least 16 weeks before inclusion. Patients were followed-up from the 1st ustekinumab dose to treatment discontinuation or last visit. Only patients with active disease [Partial Mayo Score (PMS)&amp;gt;2] at ustekinumab start were considered in the effectiveness analysis. Clinical effectiveness was based on PMS. Patients who stopped ustekinumab before their last visit were considered not in remission at subsequent time points (negative imputation). Results 620 patients were included (table 1). 78% of patients who started ustekinumab maintenance treatment, did it with 90 mg every-8-weeks dose. 155 patients (25%) withdrew ustekinumab during follow-up [median=12 months (m)]. Incidence rate of ustekinumab discontinuation was 20% per patient-year of follow-up. The probability of maintaining ustekinumab is shown in figure 1A. Among patients who withdrew ustekinumab, the main reasons were primary non-response (39%) and loss of response (35%). Anaemia at baseline (HR=1.5, 95%CI=1.1-2.1), steroids at baseline (HR=1.5; 95%CI=1.06-2.08), and more severe clinical activity at baseline (HR=1.5; 95%CI=1.09-2.06) were associated with higher risk of ustekinumab discontinuation. Short and long-term effectiveness of ustekinumab is shown on figure 1B. Moderate-severe vs. mild disease activity at baseline (OR=0.3, 95%CI=0.2-0.5), male sex (OR=0.5; 95%CI=0.4-0.8), and increased number of previous biologics (OR=0.6, 95%CI=0.6-0.8) were associated with lower likelihood of steroid-free remission at week 16. A total of 57 (25%) patients among those with active disease at baseline and with steroid-free remission at week 16, lost response during a median follow-up of 8 m (IQR=3-16 m) (figure 1C). The dose was escalated in 72% of patients with loss of response, and 80% improved (67% remission); an intravenous reinduction was given in 3 patients, and none of them improved. A total of 176 patients (28%) had at least one adverse event, with infections being the most frequent (11%). No negative impact on extraintestinal manifestations and/or immunomediated diseases was seen. Conclusion Ustekinumab was effective in inducing remission even in highly refractory UC patients. A proportion of patients discontinue the treatment, mostly due to primary failure and loss of response. Dose escalation may be effective to regain response after loss of effectiveness. The safety profile was similar to previously reported.

P615 Clinical efficacy of accelerated 4-weekly vs. Conventional 8-weekly ustekinumab dosing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A single centre experience

Abstract Background 8-weekly dosing regimen of ustekinumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is the current standard of care. Accelerated 4-weekly dosing has been suggested to be efficacious, however not licensed, in ‘non-responders’. The aim of this study is to determine how 4-weekly accelerated dosing regimen in ustekinumab drug levels correlate with response to treatment in patients with IBD. Methods Patients for inclusion were identified retrospectively utilising online prescription records at Mercy University Hospital, Cork. Inclusion criteria consisted of IBD patients commenced on ustekinumab with a treatment duration of at least 6 months. Participants were separated into 4-weekly and 8-weekly treatment groups. Faecal calprotectin (FCP) levels/ustekinumab drug levels were recorded from the 12-week check in post initiation and at the 2nd assessment. Symptoms were scored at these visits and further quantified using the Harvey Bradshaw index for Crohn’s Disease and the partial mayo score for Ulcerative Colitis. Results 101 patients at the Mercy University Hospital Cork were identified utilising a database of prescriptions and physical charts (4-weekly: 27; 8-weekly: 74). A statistically significant decrease in FCP levels at 2nd assessment was noted in patients with 4-weekly dosing (p=0.028). There was no statistically significant relationship between dosing interval and symptoms (p=0.735). Individual patient factors including age, gender, type of IBD, and concurrent IBD medications did not have a statistically significant effect on faecal calprotectin levels or symptoms. Conclusion The greater percentage decrease in faecal calprotectin provides objective evidence supporting the escalated dosing interval at the Mercy University Hospital IBD centre. However, further study is necessary to justify increasing the dosing interval for all patients treated with ustekinumab for IBD.

P702 Long term outcomes following de-escalation of dose-intensified ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease

Abstract Background Data on outcomes following de-escalation of dose-intensified ustekinumab (UST) in Crohn’s disease (CD) have not been reported. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the failure rates 6, 12, and 24 months after de-escalation from dose-intensified UST to standard dose UST and identify predictors of failure. Methods Single centre, retrospective study of consecutive CD patients undergoing de-escalation of dose-intensified UST (90mg 4-weekly) to standard dosing (90mg 8-weekly). De-escalation and post de-escalation decisions were informed by protocolised 6-monthly assessment using Harvey-Bradshaw Index, C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin (FCP), drug level and intestinal ultrasound. Failure was defined by re-escalation of UST, corticosteroids, switch out of class, or IBD-related hospitalisation or surgery. Success was defined by continued standard UST dosing. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher-exact and continuous variables using Mann-Whitney U tests between groups. Results 14 patients underwent de-escalation from April 2020 to March 2023. The median age was 41 years, disease duration 15 years, and duration on dose-intensified UST 34 months. 43% received IV reinduction at time of escalation, 86% had previous exposure to advanced therapies, of which 43% were dose-intensified. 36% were on an immunomodulator (IMM) at de-escalation. In the 6 months prior to de-escalation, the median CRP was 3.5mg/L, FCP 96mg/g, and 91% were in sonographic remission. 5/14 (36%) failed de-escalation at 6 months and 9/14 (64%) failed by 12 months. Of those with 24 months follow up, 9/12 (75%) failed de-escalation. Median time to failure was 8 months (IQR 4.5-13). All patients who failed underwent re-escalation and 2 required surgery. UST drug levels reduced from 3.6 to 1.9mg/mL 6 months post de-escalation. Re-escalation successfully recaptured response in 7/9 (78%). A greater proportion of patients with successful de-escalation at 12 months received concomitant IMM compared to those that failed (80% vs. 11%, respectively; p = 0.02). There were no other significant differences in clinical or disease characteristics between those with failure vs. success at 6, 12, or 24 months, although numbers were small (Table 1). Conclusion One-third of patients failed de-escalation of dose-intensified UST at 6 months, two-thirds failed at 12 months and three-quarters by 24 months. Patients considered for a trial of de-escalation need close, objective monitoring as most failure occurs early, and re-escalation is successful in the majority. Concomitant IMM may reduce failure rates and should be considered. Further studies are required to confirm these findings and identify additional predictors of de-escalation failure.

P916 Off-label dose escalation of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients. Incidence rate, timing, dosing patterns and outcomes

Abstract Background In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), after intravenous induction,Ustekinumab (UST) is administered as maintenance 90 mg every 8 (Q8) or 12 weeks (Q12) subcutaneously. As with other biological drugs, dose intensification may be effective after inadequate response or loss of response. However, different dosing regimens have been used and the best strategy is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence and efficacy of UST off-label dose escalation in IBD. Methods We performed an observational cohort study in 2 hospitals in Vigo,Spain. All patients who started UST between 1 June 2017 and 31 December 2022 to control their active IBD were enrolled. The primary endpoints were incidence rate and outcomes of UST off-label dose intensification. Secondary endpoints were the timing of dose escalation and the patterns indicated. Results 1 173 IBD patients received UST: females 53.8% (93), mean age 49.7(15.5) years, Crohn´s disease 82% (142), previous anti-TNF 93.6% (162) and vedolizumab 22.5% (39) (Table 1). Subcutaneous UST was maintained Q8 in 63.6% (110) and Q12 in 34.7% (60). Baseline activity data were higher in Q8 patients (p=0.001). At 16 week 23 patients (13.3%) had no response, but 9 (39.1%) became late responders at 6 months. Of the 173 IBD patients included, 38.2% and 30.6 % achieved clinical response and clinical remission at 1 year. Dose escalation was performed in 32.4% (56) with different patterns: 54.5% Q4 (30), 21.8% reinduction plus Q4 (12), 12.7% Q6 (7) and 10.9% only intravenous reinduction (6). The timing of dose escalation was: before 6 months in 19.6% (11), at 12 months 42.8% (24) and at 2 years 73.2% (41). Response and remission were achieved in 28.6% (16) and 41.1% (23) after dose escalation respectively. In 6.4% of the patients (11) a second dose escalation was indicated. Neither previous anti-TNF or vedolizumab nor concomitant use of steroids at starting UST were associated to dose escalation. IBD patients that were initially scheduled to receive subcutaneous UST Q12 needed less dosing escalation (p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion Off-label UST dose escalation was frequent and effective in achieving response in IBD patients. The schemes of dose-escalation were heterogeneous between the participants. Patients initially scheduled Q12 due to lower inflammatory activity required less dose escalation.

Anti-CD20-Triggered Crohn’s-Like Disease with Severe Perianal Involvement in a Patient with Multiple Sclerosis: Case Report, Review of the Literature, and Potential Therapeutic Approach

This case report describes a 38-year-old female patient with a 3-year history of multiple sclerosis who developed rituximab-induced pancolitis, possibly representing a new onset of inflammatory bowel disease. The patient presented with bloody diarrhea, epigastric pain, fever, and general malaise. Laboratory testing revealed elevated acute inflammation markers, and endoscopy showed deep ulcerations and severe perianal disease. The patient was treated effectively with corticosteroids. Monthly doses of ustekinumab have been administered during follow-up due to perianal disease that has remitted. Rituximab was discontinued and ozanimod was initiated with clinical and analytical stability to date.

S1191 Prior Anti-TNF-Alpha Exposure Is Associated with Ustekinumab Dose Escalation in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

S1191 Prior Anti-TNF-Alpha Exposure Is Associated with Ustekinumab Dose Escalation in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Efficacy of Ustekinumab Optimization by 2 Initial Intravenous Doses in Adult Patients With Severe Crohn's Disease.

Although increasing studies have reported that dose escalation can improve treatment response to ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), their strategies mainly focus on maintenance regimen. Evidence of ustekinumab dose escalation in induction regimen, particularly in severe CD, remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous ustekinumab with 2 initial doses in patients with severely active CD. A retrospective observational study of 99 adult patients with severe CD treated with ustekinumab from 3 IBD centers included 48 patients with standard and 51 with optimized induction treatment. Clinical outcomes, inflammatory biomarkers including fecal calprotectin (FC) normalization, and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated at weeks 16 and 48. Adverse events and treatment decisions after initial induction were also collected. Compared with the standard group, 2 initial intravenous injections of ustekinumab achieved higher clinical response (92.2%, 47 of 51, P = .656), clinical remission (88.2%, 45 of 51, P = .221), endoscopic response (75.8%, 25 of 33, P = .125), and FC normalization (70.6%, 36 of 51, P = .138) at week 16. The mucosal healing rate at week 16 (63.6%, P = .022) was statistically higher in the optimization group. At week 48, patients with optimized treatment achieved higher clinical response (80.4%, 41 of 51, P = .003), clinical remission (70.6%, 36 of 51, P = .007), FC normalization (66.7%, 34 of 51, P = .031), endoscopic response (72.7%, 24 of 33, P = .006), and mucosal healing (57.6%, 19 of 33, P = .004). At the last follow-up, 82.4% of optimally treated patients adhered to continued treatment with ustekinumab (P < .001). Optimization of ustekinumab by 2 initial intravenous inductions is more effective than standard therapy for adult patients with severe CD.