Dose Of Unfractionated Heparin Research Articles

#949 Factor XIIa inhibitory antibody does not provide sufficient anticoagulation in ex vivo hemodialysis

Abstract Background and Aims Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are the most commonly used anticoagulants in haemodialysis (HD). While effective in preventing clotting, they are also associated with complications including increased risk of bleeding and heparin induced thrombocytopenia. The contact activation system is commonly assumed to be the main trigger of coagulation during HD, through autoactivation of factor (F)XII upon contact with the dialyser. FXII deficient individuals do not have an increased risk of bleeding which makes activated FXII (FXIIa) an attractive drug target as it has the potential to inhibit clotting without disrupting haemostasis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of CSL312, a monoclonal, humanized IgG4 antibody against activated FXII (FXIIa), in preventing intradialytic coagulation. Method An ex vivo haemodialysisis model was used to test the efficacy of CSL312 as an anticoagulant. CSL312 (400 µg/mL) was compared to standard doses of UFH, LMWH and citrate anticoagulation. The antibody was provided by CSL Limited. Anticoagulant-free haemodialysisis was used as control. Whole-blood was collected from 12 healthy adult donors in blood-transfer bags containing citrate to prevent clotting before dialysis. Each donor provided blood for two HD-sessions, using different anticoagulants. The blood was dialyzed for one hour through paediatric polysulfone high-flux dialysers. Right before the start of HD, calcium was added to reverse the anticoagulant effect of citrate, except in the citrate group. Blood was sampled before and at 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes after HD start. To quantify the activity of the contact system, the concentrations of enzyme-inhibitor complexes of antithrombin (AT) or C1-inhibitor (C1INH) in conjunction with FXIIa, FXIa, kallikrein, MASP-1, MASP-2 and thrombin were measured in plasma using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results Using CSL312 to inhibit FXIIa protease activity (n = 5), clotting occurred in all tests (at 30, 31, 36, 49 and 50 minutes) with a mean clotting time of 39.2 minutes compared to 17 and 30 minutes using no anticoagulation (n = 2). No clotting was evident with other anticoagulants. Using CSL312, the plasma concentration of FXIIa-C1INH at 15 minutes was significantly higher than at baseline (mean 26.2 (SD 9.08) vs mean 17.6 (SD 10.6) µg/mL, p = 0.011). Conclusion FXIIa inhibition using a monoclonal antibody does not provide sufficient anticoagulation during HD. This suggests that the contact system may not be solely responsible for clotting during HD.

Prophylactic Unfractionated Heparin in Antepartum Hospitalizations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

To assess the effect of gestational age-based dosing of unfractionated heparin (UFH) compared with standard dosing of UFH for thromboprophylaxis on an elevated serum activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) during prolonged antepartum hospitalizations. This was a randomized trial of pregnant persons who were admitted in the antepartum period for at least 72 hours. Participants were randomly allocated to the standard dose of UFH (5,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours) or the gestational age-based dose of UFH (first trimester [less than 14 weeks]: 5,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours; second trimester [14-27 6/7 weeks]: 7,500 units subcutaneously every 12 hours; third trimester (28 weeks or more): 10,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours). The primary outcome was the proportion of antepartum patients who had an elevated serum aPTT value above the normal range (more than 36.2 seconds) 6 hours after an UFH dose. Secondary outcomes included the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reported side effects of heparin administration. Between December 15, 2020, and April 1, 2022, 97 patients with antepartum hospitalizations were screened and 46 were randomized: 22 allocated to standard dosing and 24 allocated to gestational age-based dosing of UFH. A significantly greater proportion of antepartum patients who received gestational age-based dosing had an abnormal elevation in aPTT compared with those who received standard dosing (33.3% vs 4.8%, P=.02). Gestational age-based dosing resulted in higher maximum [interquartile range] aPTT (30.4 [27.4, 37.5] vs 26.6 [23.0, 29.6], P=.01) and anti-Xa levels (0.09 [0.09, 0.11] vs 0.09 [0.09, 0.09], P=.04). There was no significant difference in VTE between groups (P=.47). Gestational age-based dosing of UFH for thromboprophylaxis of antepartum hospitalizations was associated with significantly increased rates of elevated coagulation parameters compared with standard fixed dosing. This study suggests a need for close monitoring if higher doses of UFH during pregnancy are used later in gestation. The efficacy of gestational age-based dosing compared with standard dosing for UFH to prevent thromboembolic events remains an area for future investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04635839.

Anticoagulation stewardship: Improving adherence to clinical guidelines and reducing overuse of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients

Adherence to guideline recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTE) in hospitalized medical patients is suboptimal despite national policies and institutional interventions. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve adherence to guidelines and decrease the overuse of VTE prophylaxis in order to reduce the institutional cost for heparins. A multidisciplinary anticoagulation stewardship program (ACSP) using the audit and feedback strategy was implemented on the medicine inpatient units at a teaching hospital in Canada. The primary outcome measure was a comparison, pre and post introduction of the ACSP, of the costs per 6-month period for prophylactic dose enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin on the medicine units. The balancing measures were the 90-day VTE rate and major bleeding rate during the hospitalization. Six months after the implementation of the ACSP, the cost was decreased by >50 % without any observed negative impact on patient safety. This study demonstrates the potential for anticoagulation stewardship programs to optimize the use of VTE prophylaxis and reduce the associated costs and risks.

Alpha gal syndrome, a relative not absolute contraindication to the use of bovine pericardium to close an intracardiac septal defect: a case report

BackgroundAlpha-gal syndrome is an allergic condition in which individuals develop an immune-mediated hypersensitivity response when consuming red meat and its derived products. Its diagnosis is important in individuals undergoing cardiac surgery, as patients frequently require large doses of unfractionated heparin or the insertion of surgical implants, both of which are porcine or bovine in origin. There are currently no guidelines for heparin administration in alpha-gal patients, with even less knowledge regarding the long-term clinical implications of these patients after receiving bioprosthetic valve replacements or other prostheses.Case presentationWe present the case of a 31-year-old male who underwent cardiac surgery in the setting of alpha-gal syndrome for a large atrial septal defect (ASD) and mitral valve prolapse (MVP). The patient continues to do well one year after undergoing a mitral valve repair, tricuspid valve repair and an ASD closure using bovine pericardium. He sustained no adverse reaction to the use of heparin products or the presence of a bovine pericardial patch. This rare case was managed by a multidisciplinary team consisting of cardiothoracic surgery, cardiac anesthesiology, and allergy/immunology that led to an optimal outcome despite the patient’s pertinent allergic history.ConclusionsThis case highlights that the use of bovine pericardium and porcine heparin to close septal defects in patients with milder forms of alpha-gal allergy can be considered if other options are not available. Further studies are warranted to investigate the long-term outcomes of such potential alpha-gal containing prostheses and heparin exposure and establish the optimal decision making algorithm and prophylactic regimen.

Thromboelastography versus thromboelastometry for unfractionated heparin monitoring in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Background: Monitoring the anticoagulant effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients is complex but critically important to balance the risks of treatment related bleeding and circuit thrombosis. While guidelines recommend using more than one method to monitor UFH activity, the use of thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor UFH in ECMO patients has not been investigated in detail.Methods: This is an observational, single-center retrospective study looking at adult ECMO patients on UFH that had ROTEM and thromboelastography (TEG) tests obtained concurrently. A total of 20 samples were obtained from nine patients during the study period, seven of which were on veno-arterial (VA) ECMO and two of which were on veno-venous (VV) ECMO.Results: Under institutional standard operating practice, when TEG and/or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were considered therapeutic, intrinsic thromboelastometry clotting time (INTEM CT) was only 1.2 times higher than the normal range. TEG based monitoring compared to aPTT based monitoring tended to result in lower anti-Xa levels and less intensive anticoagulation. For the total cohort, bleeding events, driven by the need for blood transfusions, were more common compared to ischemic events (77% vs 11%; p = 0.02).Conclusion: INTEM CT tended to be less sensitive to lower doses of UFH with a value of 1.2 times higher than the normal range when aPTT and/or TEG were considered therapeutic. Due to the relative insensitivity of ROTEM, our institution decided to continue to use TEG instead of ROTEM. Larger, multicenter trials may be helpful to validate these findings.

Contributing factors to heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Since the risk factors for heparin resistance (HR) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have not been fully clarified, this study investigated the contributing factors for HR after the initial unfractionated heparin (UFH) dose of 500IU/kg. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 371 patients who underwent CPB surgery, with the initial UFH dose of 500IU/kg, between May 2017 and December 2021. We defined HR as the failure to achieve activated clotting time (ACT) of > 480s after the initial UFH dose of 500IU/kg. HR was observed in 36 patients (9.7%) (HR group), while HR was not observed in 335 patients (control group). The HR group included significantly more patients with preoperative use of UFH, with significantly higher white blood cell counts, fibrinogen, fibrinogen degradation products, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein, and lower hemoglobin and albumin. The multivariable logistic regression analysis identified albumin (OR: 3.09, 95% CI 1.3504-7.0845, p = 0.0075) and fibrinogen (OR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.9869-0.9963, p = 0.0003) as independent predictors for HR. Using the Youden index, the cutoffs of albumin and fibrinogen were calculated as 3.8g/dL and 303mg/dL, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed the predictive performance of albumin (area under the curve (AUC): 0.78, sensitivity: 65%, specificity: 81%) and fibrinogen (AUC: 0.77, sensitivity: 56%, specificity: 88%). The incidence of HR after the initial UFH dose of 500IU/kg was 9.7%. The preoperative albumin < 3.8g/dL and fibrinogen > 303mg/dL were independent predictors for HR.

Impact of anticoagulation intensity on blood transfusion for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during lung transplantation

Venoarterial ECMO is increasingly used for mechanical circulatory support during lung transplant. Optimal intensity of intraoperative anticoagulation would be expected to mitigate thromboembolism without increasing bleeding and blood product transfusions. Yet, the optimal intensity of intraoperative anticoagulation is unknown. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 163 patients who received a bilateral lung transplant at a single center. We categorized intensity of anticoagulation into four groups (very low to high) based on the bolus dose of unfractionated heparin given during lung transplant and compared the rates of intraoperative blood transfusions and the occurrence of thromboembolism between groups. When compared to the very low intensity group, each higher intensity group was associated with higher red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet transfusions. The occurrence of thromboembolism was similar across groups. These preliminary data suggest that lower intensity anticoagulation may reduce the rate of intraoperative blood transfusions although further study is needed.

Elevated Anti-Xa in the Setting of Prophylactic Unfractionated Subcutaneous Heparin Administration.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin is a common practice in hospitalized patients. Typically, prophylactic doses of these medications have poor bioavailability and thus do not reach therapeutic serum concentrations. However, in certain circumstances, heparin binding proteins may become saturated. Here we report a case series of 5 patients who had elevated anti-Xa levels while receiving prophylactic dosing of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin.

Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis.

Haemodialysis (HD) requires safe and effective anticoagulation to prevent clot formation within the extracorporeal circuit during dialysis treatments to enable adequate dialysis and minimise adverse events, including major bleeding. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may provide a more predictable dose, reliable anticoagulant effects and be simpler to administer than unfractionated heparin (UFH) for HD anticoagulation, but may accumulate in the kidneys and lead to bleeding. To assess the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation strategies (including both heparin and non-heparin drugs) for long-term HD in people with kidney failure. Any intervention preventing clotting within the extracorporeal circuit without establishing anticoagulation within the patient, such as regional citrate, citrate enriched dialysate, heparin-coated dialysers, pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF), and saline flushes were also included. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to November 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled studies (quasi-RCTs) evaluating anticoagulant agents administered during HD treatment in adults and children with kidney failure. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool and extracted data. Treatment effects were estimated using random effects meta-analysis and expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE). We included 113 studies randomising 4535 participants. The risk of bias in each study was adjudicated as high or unclear for most risk domains. Compared to UFH, LMWH had uncertain effects on extracorporeal circuit thrombosis (3 studies, 91 participants: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.42; I2 = 8%; low certainty evidence), while major bleeding and minor bleeding were not adequately reported. Regional citrate anticoagulation may lower the risk of minor bleeding compared to UFH (2 studies, 82 participants: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.85; I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). No studies reported data comparing regional citrate to UFH on risks of extracorporeal circuit thrombosis and major bleeding. The effects of very LMWH, danaparoid, prostacyclin, direct thrombin inhibitors, factor XI inhibitors or heparin-grafted membranes were uncertain due to insufficient data. The effects of different LMWH, different doses of LMWH, and the administration of LMWH anticoagulants using inlet versus outlet bloodline or bolus versus infusion were uncertain. Evidence to compare citrate to another citrate or control was scant. The effects of UFH compared to no anticoagulant therapy or different doses of UFH were uncertain. Death, dialysis vascular access outcomes, blood transfusions, measures of anticoagulation effect, and costs of interventions were rarely reported. No studies evaluated the effects of treatment on non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospital admissions. Adverse events were inconsistently and rarely reported. Anticoagulant strategies, including UFH and LMWH, have uncertain comparative risks on extracorporeal circuit thrombosis, while major bleeding and minor bleeding were not adequately reported. Regional citrate may decrease minor bleeding, but the effects on major bleeding and extracorporeal circuit thrombosis were not reported. Evidence supporting clinical decision-making for different forms of anticoagulant strategies for HD is of low and very low certainty, as available studies have not been designed to measure treatment effects on important clinical outcomes.

The Impact of Laboratory Sample Request Evaluation and the Use of Probability Testing for HIT By Trained Physician on the Decrease of Unnecessary Tests and Increase the Likelihood of Positivity

Introduction: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an extremely serious and potentially fatal condition that can develop in patients taking heparin-based medications, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The laboratory tests for diagnosis of HIT is expensive and time consuming. Clinical assessment (4Ts) followed by testing for Heparin/platelet factor 4 antibody in intermediate and high risk patients is the standard algorithm of pretest for (HIT) which can be later confirmed by serotonin releasing assay if available. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of laboratory practice of pretest evaluation of samples submitted for HIT testing in a cohort of patients treated in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia who had a clinical suspicion of HIT. The 4 T score was a pretest requisite to proceed for electronic request for HIT. It had to be performed by the requesting physicians of different medical specialties. The request then been evaluated by hematopathologist before proceeding. The test will be cancelled if: the 4T score calculated by attending physician is &amp;lt; 4 or if platelet count is normal with no evidence of significant drop in the last 4 days from request or the test was performed at least 2 days before the new request. Additional exercise was performed by two physicians in training after train them to standardize the calculation of the 4T scores without re evaluation by the hematopatologist. The sample proceeded for testing if it met the testing criteria of 4T score &amp;gt; 3 and passed the evaluation by the hematopathologist. All tested sample were performed by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies via an ELISA (Asserachrom HPIA-IgG, Stago Diagnostica STA®) and Optic density ( OD) and was evaluated and considered positive if OD &amp;gt;0.39 with sub classification to low positive 0.4-1, moderate 1-2 and strong if &amp;gt;2. Over a period of 2 years, we received 449 samples for patients who were admitted to our hospital, received prophylactic or therapeutic doses of LMWH or UFH, and underwent an HIT test due to clinical suspicion ( &amp;gt; 50% drop in platelet count from baseline, or ≥ 2 consecutive platelet counts &amp;lt; 150,000 per mm 3 and was defined as possible HIT). The 4 T score was calculated in the hospital system by attending physicians referred to as (system 4T score) and recalculated by trained two physicians and referred to (re calculated 4T score). Descriptive statistics, paired samples statistics, correlations, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed. Results: The test was labeled by the laboratory physician ( hematopathologist ) as not indicated and test was not performed in 156 (35%) for various reasons including low 4 T score &amp;lt;3 in 90 (57%), Normal platelet count &amp;gt; 150 at time of test ( and wrong calculated 4T score) in 28 (18%), duplication of test order in 10 (6.4%%), There was clear other cause of thrombocytopenia in 15 (10%), Bad sample quality 5 (3.2%%) and 8 (5%) for other reasons. The samples for HIT test were for 231(51%) males and 220 (49%) females with mean age 56.3 (1-102) years. The mean platelet count at time of request was 82.9 (2-384) per mm 3. Out of the total cohort 422 (95.1%) patients had received UFH and only 22 (4.9%) received LMWH. There is only 69/449 (15.4%) agreement between the two calculations (system and re calculated score) . Out of the tested samples 293, total positive tests 19 (6.5%), were 11 (3.8%) had low positive for HIT test, moderate positive in 6 (2%) and only 2 strongly positive for HIT. The calculated (system 4T score) of &amp;lt; 4 were 142 (32%) samples while the (re calculated 4T score) were 136 (30%) of which 60 ( 38%) of the cancelled tests by hematopathologist, of which 68 (23%) of tested samples were negative and 7 (37%) of positive tests could have been missed based on this calculation. There were 12 out of 19 had moderate and high score by calculation and positive HIT while there were 17 out of 19 had moderate and high score by system calculation. Conclusion: We are reporting improved detection of HIT and confirmed the value of applying the 4 T score for HIT testing with added value of pre test screening to exclude low probability and cancel samples with no clear indication of HIT due to presence of other causes of thrombocytopenia.The retrospective re calculation even with more trained physicians did not add a value compared to pretest evaluation and screening by hematopathologist which had resulted in cancelation or more than third of the requested tests.

Thrombosis Rates and Use of Thromboprophylaxis after Discharge from Gynecologic Cancer-Related Surgery

Background: Cancer and major abdominopelvic surgeries pose significant thrombosis risks, making cancer-related surgery highly susceptible to venous thromboembolism (VTE) despite prophylaxis. Without post-operative thromboprophylaxis (TPX), VTE risk can reach 29% in the weeks following major surgeries. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend anticoagulation for up to 4 weeks after such surgeries, primarily using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 28 days postoperatively. This study aimed to determine VTE rates linked to various gynecologic cancer-related surgeries and explore TPX utilization in a large cancer-center cohort. Additionally, we sought to further understand the necessity for post-discharge TPX in this setting. Methods: Patients (pts) diagnosed with gynecologic cancer between January 1st, 2012, through September 15th, 2022, at our institution were identified through our tumor registry. Using an in-house automated text search tool from our electronic medical record (Epic®), combined with natural language processing review, venous thromboembolism (VTE) events were identified, with secondary adjudication by the study leader (GAS). VTE was defined as either lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosed from the day of surgery until 90 days after the first day of surgery. Logistic regression was performed on binary outcomes for the presence of VTE and TPX use at discharge. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used for overall survival analysis. Results: 801 pts who underwent gynecologic cancer-related surgeries were identified. Patient demographics and surgery types are described in Table 1. VTE occurred in 1.9% (n=15) of the overall population but was unequally distributed. The number of VTE in those undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS), vulvovaginal surgery, and biopsies collectively was low (0.57%, n=3), even when considering that only 11.1% of those pts received TPX at discharge. VTE was more commonly diagnosed in patients who underwent open surgery (4.3%, n=12), with 5 pts (1.8%) diagnosed before discharge and 7 pts (2.5%) after discharge. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, during the full study period, open procedures were associated with a higher risk of thrombosis, (relative risk 7.5, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and higher use of post-discharge TBX (RR 4.55, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Notably, only 50% (139 of 279) of pts who underwent open surgery received TPX at the time of discharge. Within the open surgery cohort, the rate of post-discharge VTE correlated with the use of post-discharge TPX. Of pts on TPX, 0.7% (n=1) were diagnosed with VTE compared to 4.3% (n=6) of pts who did not receive TPX (RR=0.17, p= 0.12). There was no difference in overall survival in pts who received TPX and those who did not after open surgery up to 36 months after the surgery. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a tiered risk of post-operative VTE after gynecologic cancer surgery, with a clinically relevant risk observed only in women undergoing open surgery. Our gynecologic oncology practice already reflects this, as post-operative TPX is not routinely prescribed for lower-risk procedures. In patients who underwent open surgery, TPX at discharge showed a trend towards a protective effect, although this result did not reach statistical significance, probably due to sample size, it supports the need for a targeted prospective study. If this trend towards benefit holds in a prospective study, the number needed to treat to avoid one clinically detected post-operative VTE would be 28 pts. The relatively high fraction of post-op VTE events during the inpatient hospital stay also supports efforts for early TPX, as has been done with a prophylactic dose of pre-operative unfractionated heparin or LMWH in other high-risk cancer surgery settings (Selby et al, J Am Coll Surg. 2016). The limitations of this study include being conducted at a single institution, retrospective and non-randomized.

Platelet reactivity and activated clotting time predict haemorrhagic site complications in patients with chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background/Introduction Same-day discharge has become a standard of care for patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) treated with ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). QuickClot Radial kaolin-based haemostatic device may shorten haemostasis time and reduce the incidence of vascular site complications. Besides unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin (ASA), an ad hoc procedure demands a loading dose of clopidogrel. Dynamic changes in platelets and thrombotic activity may influence the outcomes at vascular sites. Rapid "point-of-care" testing measures the effects of anticoagulation but the optimal threshold during and after PCI still requires further research. Purpose We investigated the effect of a standard dose of UFH and a loading dose of clopidogrel measured with point-of-care devices: Hemochron activated clotting time device (ACT), VerifyNow P2Y12 test on on-site outcomes. Methods We conducted a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients with CCS who qualified for ad hoc PCI. Patients were on chronic ASA therapy, received 100 IU/kg UFH, and a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel. ACT was measured before and 10 min, 2 h, and 6 h after the administration of UFH and clopidogrel, respectively, and the VerifyNow P2Y12 test measured after 2 and 6 h. A QuickClot haemostatic pad with gradually released compression for up to 2 h was used in all patients. Ultrasonographic assessment of artery diameter and patency was performed before and 6 h after the procedure. Bleeding (BARC criteria) or local haematoma (EASY scale) were observed regularly until hospital discharge. Results Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The mean±SD age was 68.8±8.8 years, 30 (75%) patients were men, 13 (35%) had diabetes, 38 (95%) hypertension, 16 (40%) previous myocardial infarction, and 15 (37,5%) were active smokers. Patients received a median [interquartile range (IQR)] 8000 [7000-9000] IU of UFH and 600 mg of clopidogrel. All of the radial arteries remained patent during observation; local bleeding (BARC 2) was observed in 11 (27,5%) and haematomas (EASY 1 and 2) in 11 (27,5%) patients. Patients with bleeding had lower platelet activity measured with platelet reactivity units (PRU) after 2 h (122.5± 51 vs 158.7± 43, p= 0.04) and higher ACT (s) (216.9 ±40 vs. 184.6±28 s, p=0.006). An ACT &amp;gt;196 s, measured 2 h after the procedure, predicted the occurrence of bleeding or haematoma (AUC 0.72; 95%CI 0.56-0.85, p=0.008). Conclusion Lower platelet activity and higher ACT after PCI were associated with higher risk of haemorrhagic site complications. "Point-of-care" measures post PCI in CCS patients may be clinically applicable.

The effect of heparin dose on radial artery occlusion in patients undergoing coronary procedures via distal radial access: a sub-analysis of a randomized trial

Abstract Background Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most common complication following coronary catheterization. Several measures have been taken to prevent RAO, including increasing the dose of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and using a distal radial artery (DRA) approach. However, the effect of a higher dose of UFH on RAO incidence in the DRA approach remains unclear. Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of heparin dose (50IU/kg or ≥70IU/kg) after DRA approach on RAO incidence. Methods Data were obtained from a previous randomized controlled trial comparing distal to conventional radial access regarding RAO. Patients having undergone DRA access were stratified into two groups based on heparin dose received. A Pearson chi-square test was used to compare RAO incidence between the groups, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, considering baseline and periprocedural details. Results Data on RAO incidence and heparin dose were available for 768 patients, and 379 catheterized via DRA. A total of 234 patients received ≥70IU/kg heparin dose and the rest 145 received 50IU/kg. A higher dose of UFH was not associated with a lower incidence of RAO (3.3% vs. 3.4%, p=0.957). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the use of 5-Fr sheaths (odds ratio [OR]: 0.044, 95% CI: 0.003-0.755), a lower number of diagnostic catheters (OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.250-4.878), and a shorter total procedure time (OR: 1.034, 95% CI: 1.011-1.059) were significantly associated with lower rates of RAO. Conclusions Our analysis indicates that a higher dose of UFH (≥70IU/kg) did not reduce RAO incidence in DRA access. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these findings.

Safety and Effectiveness of an Anti-Xa-based Unfractionated Heparin Protocol for Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices.

Background: Impella devices are used for mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock or those undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anticoagulation protocols in this population are not well established and are complicated by concomitant use of purge solutions containing unfractionated heparin (UFH) and intravenous UFH continuous infusion (CI) for systemic anticoagulation. Objectives: To evaluate thrombotic and bleeding complications when using a novel UFH protocol with a reduced initial UFH CI dose of 6 units/kg/hour targeting an anti-Xa goal of 0.3 to 0.5 units/mL in patients receiving Impella support. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 41 patients on Impella support who received an UFH purge solution and/or an IV UFH infusion. The primary outcome was overall composite bleeding. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events and systemic UFH exposure. An exploratory analysis was performed to identify risk factors for bleeding. Results: Anti-Xa values were in therapeutic range 46% of the time while on support (interquartile range 16.6%-75%), with a median IV UFH dose of 6 units/kg/hour. The overall bleeding rate was 29.2%, with 6 minor bleeds and 2 major bleeds with no fatal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage. Rate of overall thrombosis was 4.9%, including 1 ischemic stroke and 1 occurrence of limb ischemia. Conclusion: Use of a modified UFH protocol to target an anti-Xa goal of 0.3 to 0.5 units/mL resulted in bleeding and thrombotic event rates similar to previous literature. This protocol utilizing an initial rate of 6 units/kg/hour may be a useful approach to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation while accounting for UFH exposure from the purge solution and minimizing need for frequent calculations.

Use of a New Standardized Unfractionated Heparin Protocol for Left-Sided Ablation Procedures Improves Time in the Therapeutic ACT Range

Objectives: This study evaluated whether a novel standardized heparin dosing protocol used during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation resulted in a higher percentage of therapeutic activated clotting time (ACT) values compared to historic nonstandardized procedures. DesignA retrospective cohort study SettingThis study was conducted at Ochsner Medical Center, the largest tertiary care teaching hospital in New Orleans, LA ParticipantsPatients undergoing catheter-based atrial fibrillation ablation InterventionsWe implemented a standardized heparin protocol and enrolled patients between November 2020 and March 2021. The historic controls consisted of patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation between April 2020 and September 2020. Heparin administration in the control group was based on physician preference and was nonstandardized. Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary endpoint was the percentage of intraprocedural ACTs in therapeutic range (≥300 to <450 s). Secondary endpoints included first measured ACT at ≥300 s and percent of measured ACTs in the supratherapeutic range (>450 s). Comparisons were performed using chi-squared tests or Fisher exact tests. Patients in the intervention group had a higher mean percentage of ACTs in the therapeutic range compared to the control group (84.9% vs. 75.8%, p<0.001). More patients in the intervention group reached therapeutic ACT on the first measurement compared to the control group (70.3% vs. 31.2%, p<0.001). Conclusion: During catheter-based cardiac ablation procedures, a novel standardized unfractionated heparin dosing protocol resulted in a higher percentage of ACTs in the target range and a higher proportion of initial ACTs in the therapeutic range compared with baseline nonstandardized heparin dosing.

Prevalence of FXII-Deficiency and Its Relevance to Monitoring Anticoagulation in Adults Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) blood is exposed to artificial surfaces, resulting in contact activation of the intrinsic coagulation pathway initiated by coagulation factor XII (FXII). Little is known about the prevalence of acquired FXII-deficiency, especially during ECMO. The primary outcome was the prevalence of acquired FXII-deficiency (FXII activity <60%) during ECMO. Secondary outcomes included differences in hemorrhagic/thromboembolic complications, doses of unfractionated heparin administered, and time points of anticoagulation within target ranges between patients with and without FXII-deficiency. Of 193 adults receiving ECMO therapy between 2013 and 2021, FXII testing was performed in 64 (33%) patients. Of these, 89% ( n = 57) had an acquired FXII-deficiency. Median complication-free intervals were not different between patients with and without acquired FXII-deficiency (bleeding: 28 days [6-145] vs. 12 days [11-not available], p = 0.85; thromboembolism: 16 days [8-54] vs. 13 days [3-15], p = 0.053). Patients with acquired FXII-deficiency received less heparin (16,554 IU/day vs. 25,839 IU/day; p = 0.009) and were less likely to be within aPTT-target ranges (23.1% [14.3%-36.4%] vs. 37.8% [33.7%-58.3%], p = 0.005). Acquired FXII-deficiency is common during ECMO and may affect monitoring of anticoagulation. The impact of FXII-activity on complications needs to be determined in future studies.

The HEPDOSE pilot study: the use of the PRODOSE algorithm to reverse the effects of the administration of initial high dose unfractionated heparin.

The HEPDOSE pilot study: the use of the PRODOSE algorithm to reverse the effects of the administration of initial high dose unfractionated heparin.

Effects of inflammation on thrombosis and outcomes in COVID-19: secondary analysis of the ATTACC/ACTIV-4a trial

BackgroundPatients hospitalized for COVID-19 are at high risk of thrombotic complications and organ failure, and often exhibit severe inflammation, which may contribute to hypercoagulability. ObjectivesTo determine whether patients hospitalized for COVID-19 experience differing frequencies of thrombotic and organ failure complications and derive variable benefits from therapeutic-dose heparin dependent on the extent of systemic inflammation and whether observed benefit from therapeutic-dose anticoagulation varies depending on the degree of systemic inflammation. MethodsWe analyzed data from 1346 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 enrolled in the ATTACC and ACTIV-4a platforms who were randomized to therapeutic-dose heparin or usual care for whom levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were reported at baseline. ResultsIncreased CRP was associated with worse patient outcomes, including a >98% posterior probability of increased organ support requirement, hospital length of stay, risk of 28-day mortality, and incidence of major thrombotic events or death (patients with CRP 40-100 mg/L or ≥100 mg/L compared to patients with CRP <40 mg/L). Patients with CRP 40 to 100 mg/L experienced the greatest degree of benefit from treatment with therapeutic doses of unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin compared with usual-care prophylactic doses. This was most significant for an increase in organ support-free days (odds ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.40; 97.9% posterior probability of beneficial effect), with trends toward benefit for other evaluated outcomes. ConclusionModerately ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with CRP between 40 mg/L and 100 mg/L derived the greatest benefit from treatment with therapeutic-dose heparin.

Performance Assessment of Anti-Xa Assay-Based Heparin Dosing Protocol in Pediatric Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the postoperative cardiac critical care setting is evolving. Anticoagulation monitoring is among the most challenging aspects of pediatrics. However, there is no consensus on the optimal dosing and monitoring of unfractionated heparin in this setting. To address this, we developed an anti-Xa assay-based protocol derived from the best available clinical and anecdotal evidence of ECMO use and assessed its effectiveness in achieving the anti-Xa assay therapeutic target. This prospective single-arm study was conducted in the pediatric carcardiac-surgery intensive care unit of a large tertiary hospital. We used two different anti-Xa assay intensity levels based on the patients' bleeding status. The median patient age was 7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-11.25) months, and the median weight was 5.7 (IQR: 3.8-13.82) kg. The median ECMO duration was 6 (IQR: 4.5-7.5) days. The bleeding protocol was used for most patients. Seventy percent achieved the anti-Xa assay therapeutic target during the study period (median: 75.5 h, IQR: 60.5-117.5 h). Hemorrhagic complications were reported in 40% of the patients, and thrombotic complications were reported in 25%. The median length of stay was 37 (IQR: 22-43) days, with a survival-to-discharge rate of 75%. Despite a failure to achieve the anti-Xa assay target within the first ECMO days, most patients achieved the target by the median ECMO duration. Moreover, using two different anti-Xa assay levels reduced thrombotic complications.

Pharmacokinetic Modeling Using Real-World Data to Optimize Unfractionated Heparin Dosing in Pediatric Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Evaluate Target Achievement-Clinical Outcomes Relationship.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a commonly used anticoagulant for pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), but evidence is lacking on the ideal dosing. We aimed to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for UFH, measured through anti-factor Xa assay; (2) optimize UFH starting infusions and dose titrations through simulations; and (3) explore UFH exposure-clinical outcomes relationship. Data from 218 patients admitted to Utah's Primary Children's Hospital were retrospectively collected. A 1-compartment PK model with time-varying clearance (CL) adequately described UFH PK. Weight on CL and volume of distribution and ECMO circuit change on CL were significant covariates. The typical estimates for initial CL and first-order rate constant to reach steady-state CL were 0.57L/(h·10kg) and 0.02/h. Comparable to non-ECMO patients, the typical steady-state CL was 0.81L/(h·10kg). Simulations showed that a 75IU/kg UFH bolus dose followed by starting infusions of 25 and 20IU/h/kg for patients aged younger than 6 years and 6years or older, respectively, achieved the therapeutic target in 56.6% of all patients, whereas only 3.1% exceeded the target. The proposed UFH titration schemes achieved the target in more than 90% of patients while less than 0.63% were above the target after 24 and 48hours of treatment. The median intensive care unit survival time in patients within and below the target at 24hours was 136 and 66hours, respectively. In conclusion, PK model of UFH was developed for pediatric patients on ECMO. The proposed UFH dosing scheme attained the anti-factor Xa target rapidly and safely.