Dose Of Temozolomide Research Articles

DDDR-45. INVESTIGATING TEMOZOLOMIDE RESISTANCE IN GLIOBLASTOMA USING A CLINICALLY RELEVANT DOSING REGIMEN

Abstract The standard of care of management for glioblastoma, the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, involves maximal safe surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Approximately half of all treated patients develop chemoresistance to TMZ. The evolution of chemoresistance to temozolomide in vitro has historically involved continuous exposure to drug, as opposed to clinical dosing schedules, which involve five days of treatment followed by 23 days of recovery. Thus, in this study, we examined the emergence of chemoresistance to TMZ in vitro, using a clinical dosing regimen. Temozolomide dose response to RN1, an MGMT promoter unmethylated, IDH-wildtype, patient-derived glioblastoma cell line, was determined using cell titer glo. Cells were treated with TMZ for five days, followed by 23 days of recovery, in cycles. In each subsequent cycle, the dose of TMZ used was adjusted to previous cycle’s IC50, the concentration at which 50% of cell growth is inhibited. This protocol was repeated over three rounds. Cells treated with TMZ, as compared to the DMSO-treated control population, gradually acquired chemoresistance with a continuous increase in IC50. Our protocol therefore highlights how a clinically relevant dosing regimen may help capture the trajectory by which chemoresistance emerges, also allowing for the exploration of the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon.

DNAR-07. ATR INHIBITORS IN COMBINATION WITH RADIATION AND TEMOZOLOMIDE INCREASE CELL DEATH OF PATIENT-DERIVED GLIOBLASTOMA CELLS

Abstract Glioblastoma is treated with surgery to remove as much as the tumour as possible then radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) to cause extensive DNA damage in any remaining tumour cells, triggering cell death by apoptosis. However, glioblastoma cells respond by upregulating the DNA damage response (DDR) triggering DNA repair that contributes to treatment resistance. Progression then generally occurs rapidly leaving patients with a poor prognosis and survival. We previously showed that gartisertib, an inhibitor of ATM- and Rad3-Related protein (ATR), a serine/threonine kinase that triggers DNA repair, sensitises glioblastoma cells to TMZ and RT. We extend this investigation to brain-penetrant ATR inhibitors elimusertib (BAY1895344) and ceralasertib (AZD6738). Patient-derived glioblastoma cell lines were treated with a dose response of ATRi (elimusertib and ceralasertib) combined with a clinically relevant dose of TMZ (35uM) and/or RT (2Gy). A human astrocyte cell line was also treated with a dose response of single agent elimusertib and ceralasertib. Cells were incubated for 7 days and assessed for cell viability through an MTT assay or cell-cell Incucyte analysis. Both elimusertib and ceralasertib as single agents reduced glioblastoma cell growth, with elimusertib being more potent compared to ceralasertib. Elimusertib had greater potency in causing cell death of the glioblastoma cell lines than a human astrocyte cell line. However, there was less difference between glioblastoma and astrocyte cell death when treated with ceralasetib. When combined with RT and/or TMZ, elimusertib once again was more potent in reducing glioblastoma cell growth compared to ceralasertib. We have expanded our in vitro data showing that various ATR inhibitors (elimusertib, ceralasertib and previously gartisertib) are able to reduce the growth of glioblastoma cells in combination with RT and TMZ treatment. This provides further support for initiating a clinical trial of ATR inhibition in combination with standard treatment for patients with glioblastoma.

EXTH-31. TARGETINGMIR-19B/PPP2R5E REGULATORY AXIS TO MAXIMISE ALKYLATING AGENT EFFICACY: A NEW AVENUE TO COUNTERACT TEMOZOLOMIDE RESISTANCE IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMAS

Abstract Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM), notorious for its inevitable recurrence despite aggressive multi-modal standard of care, presents a pressing need for novel treatment paradigms. The extensive DNA damage caused by the frontline DNA alkylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ) is counteracted by intricate or acquired survival mechanisms. Through functional microRNA screens we identified miR-19b-overexpressing clones possessing extra fitness in presence of escalating doses of TMZ. Our study uncovers a previously unrecognized TMZ resistance mechanism governed by miR-19b. Notably, miR-19b attenuation intensified DNA damage response and CHEK1 and CHEK2 phosphorylation, instigating persistent DNA lesions and consequently priming GBM cells for heightened TMZ cytotoxicity. Mechanistically, we showed that miR-19b exerts its function by targeting PPP2R5E, a subunit of protein phosphatase PP2A, frequently downregulated in GBM. We uncovered that the elevated DNA damage response in the miR-19b-attenuated cells was a consequence of enhanced nuclear and mitochondrial ROS production. This in turn, induced ROS-mediated senescence, and an intriguing susceptibility to ferroptosis, possibly due to increased ROS-mediated lipid peroxidation. Of note, all these phenotypes were reversed in GBM cells with concomitant miR-19b and PPP2R5E attenuation, demonstrating that miR-19b exerts its role in TMZ resistance by targeting PPP2R5E. In line with this finding, an orthotopic human-derived glioblastoma stem cell xenograft model confirmed that PPP2R5E attenuation not only decreases TMZ cytotoxicity in the brain, but also at the spinal metastatic location. Consistently, treating cells with the PP2A-activating drug FTY720 or knocking down endogenous PP2A-inhibiting proteins mirrored the effects of miR-19b attenuation in enhancing TMZ cytotoxicity. This intricate interplay between miR-19b and PPP2R5E underscores a novel strategy to modulate the TMZ response, highlighting promising results in our pre-clinical models. In conclusion, our findings advocate for the therapeutic targeting of the miR-19b/PPP2R5E regulatory axis as a potential novel strategy in the pursuit of effective therapeutic interventions for the formidable recurrent GBM tumours.

IMMU-69. THERAPEUTIC WINDOW ENABLING ERADICATION OF RESIDUAL GLIOMA STEM CELLS BY INTRACRANIAL NK CELL THERAPY FOLLOWING TEMOZOLOMIDE-INDUCED TUMOUR DEPOPULATION – A POSSIBLE ROLE OF CYTOTOXIC EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is an incurable brain cancer, where dismal outcomes result from disease recurrence driven by tumour-initiating glioma stem cells (GSCs). GSCs survive and expand in the brain after surgery, radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) amidst weak immune and natural killer (NK) cell surveillance. Efficient NK cell-mediated killing of GBM cells occurs at high effector to target ratios precluding effective eradication of large tumour remnants, as enforced by clinical trials with autologous NK cells in an adjuvant setting. Here we explore in a human GSC xenograft model whether tumor depopulation using high dose Temozolomide (TMZ) could create a window of curative opportunity for endogenous or exogenous NK cells. We observed that while subcutaneous (sc) xenografts of patient derived GSCs are infiltrated by endogenous functional (NCR1+) NK cells in SCID mice, the corresponding intracranial (ic) tumours remained NK cell depleted. Notably, while TMZ caused near complete regression of intracranial GSC xenografts this was followed by inevitable recurrence of drug-resistant lesions. To explore whether direct delivery of NK cells into depopulated intracranial tumours would change the lethal course of the disease, mice were injected with GSCs intracranially, and upon tumour formation were treated with a sequence of TMZ (systemically), at 2, 7, 14, and 21 days later with irradiated NK92MI cells. Remarkably, this combined therapy completely obliterated recurrent disease at 2 and 7 days but not beyond 14 days. To assess whether NK92MI cells could be replaced by their derived extracellular vesicles (NK-EVs), the latter were injected i.c. post TMZ in GSC xenograft bearing mice. A single injection of NK-EVs resulted in tumour eradication in some but not all mice. Thus, chemotherapy-dependent tumour depopulation may create a unique window of opportunity for curative NK-mediated immunotherapy in GBM.

DESIGN AND SET UP OF A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF MEDICINAL CANNABINOIDS IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA - THE ARISTOCRAT TRIAL

Abstract AIMS ARISTOCRAT is a unique, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial of cannabinoids (nabixo- mols) alongside temozolomide in patients with MGMT-methylated recurrent GBM and is open to recruitment in 12 centres across the UK. It was rapidly funded through a crowdfunding campaign organised by The Brain Tumour Charity during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD This pragmatic phase II randomised trial was designed and set up by a multi-disciplinary team of co-applicants and trial management group (TMG) members comprising of clinicians, statisticians, trialists, Patient & Public Involvement (PPI), pharmacists and quality of life (QoL) researchers. The protocol randomises on a 2:1 ratio between nabiximols or matched placebo with standard dose temozolomide in patients at first recurrence of IDH wild-type GBM. Unique aspects include self-titration of nabiximols based on individual tolerance, and fully blinded randomisation with matched placebo. The primary outcome measure is overall survival time with key secondary outcomes including survival at 6, 12 and 24 months, progression-free survival time, health-related QoL and adverse events. Intermediate assessment of feasibility to confirm safety, compliance and achievability of recruitment will be undertaken after 40 patients are randomised. PPI input has been critical in the trial and patient-facing information design. RESULTS The trial has promoted a high level of patient and public interest, including press coverage. The trial aims to recruit a total of 234 patients over an 18 month period. CONCLUSION ARISTOCRAT will provide unique, robust clinical data on the role of nabiximols (combined with temozolomide) in improving overall survival and the impact on QoL for patients with recurrent GBM and is the first of its kind in cancer patients.

MELATONIN ENHANCES TEMOZOLOMIDE-INDUCED APOPTOSIS IN GLIOBLASTOMA AND NEUROBLASTOMA CELLS.

The combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and paclitaxel (PTX) is the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen for glioblastoma, but there is no specific treatment for neuroblastoma due to the acquired multidrug resistance. Approximately half of treated glioblastoma patients develop resistance to TMZ and experience serious side effects. Melatonin (MEL), a multifunctional hormone long known for its antitumor effects, has a great advantage in combination cancer therapy thanks to its ability to affect tumors differently than normal cells. This study aims to evaluate the in vitro inhibitory effects of MEL in combination with TMZ on cancer cell viability and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms in the glioblastoma and neuroblastoma cell lines. C6 (Rattus norvegicus) and N1E-115 (Mus musculus) cancer cell lines and C8-D1A (mice) healthy cell lines were used. Cell proliferation was evaluated using the MTT test. IC50 values were determined by probit analysis. Two concentrations of TMZ (IC50 and 1/2 IC50) were used to induce cytotoxicity in the C6 and N1E-115 cell lines, both alone and in combination with PXT and MEL (all at IC50). The viable, dead, and apoptotic cells were determined by image-based cytometry using Annexin V/PI staining. The gene expression related to signaling pathways was assessed by the quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and key proteins were identified by the Western blot analysis. MTT assay showed that the combination of TMZ and MEL significantly reduces the viability of both glioblastoma and neuroblastoma cells compared to the vehicle-treated controls. Notably, MEL combined with 1/2 IC50 TMZ showed a significant death rate of cancer cells compared to controls and PTX. According to qRT-PCR data, the TMZ + MEL combination resulted in the upregulation of the genes of antioxidative enzymes (Sod1 and Sod2) and DNA repair genes (Mlh1, Exo1, and Rad18) in both cell lines. Moreover, the levels of Nfkb1 and Pik3cg were significantly reduced following the TMZ + MEL treatment. The combination of MEL with TMZ also enhanced the cell cycle arrest and increased the expression of p53 and pro-apoptotic proteins (Bax and caspase-3), while significantly decreasing the expression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. Our findings indicate that the combination of MEL with a low dose of TMZ may serve as an upstream inducer of apoptosis. This suggests the potential development of a novel selective therapeutic strategy as an alternative to TMZ for the treatment of both glioblastoma and neuroblastoma.

447MO A clinical study of the safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride combined with temozolomide dose density scheme for the treatment of recurrent high grade glioma

447MO A clinical study of the safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride combined with temozolomide dose density scheme for the treatment of recurrent high grade glioma

Phase 1 study of NEDD8 activating enzyme inhibitor pevonedistat in combination with chemotherapy in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors (ADVL1615)

PurposeThe objective of this study was to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of pevonedistat, a first in class inhibitor of NEDD8 activating enzyme, in combination with irinotecan (IRN) and temozolomide (TMZ) in children with cancer. MethodsThis Phase 1 study used a rolling 6 design to evaluate escalating doses of pevonedistat in combination with standard doses of IRN and TMZ in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory solid or CNS tumors. During cycle 1, pevonedistat was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 10, and 12, with IRN (IV, 50 mg/m2) and TMZ (orally, 100 mg/m2), on days 8–12 of a 28-day cycle. In subsequent cycles, pevonedistat was administered on days 1, 3, and 5, with IRN/TMZ on days 1–5 of a 21-day cycle. ResultsThirty patients enrolled; all were eligible and evaluable for toxicity. Six patients each enrolled on pevonedistat dose levels (DL) 1 (15 mg/m2), 2 (20 mg/m2), 3 (25 mg/m2) and 4 (35 mg/m2) as well as an expanded pharmacokinetic (PK) cohort at DL4. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not exceeded. 2/12 (17 %) patients treated at the RP2D (35 mg/m2) experienced a cycle 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT). IRN is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of pevonedistat. Two patients had a partial response and 6 patients had prolonged stable disease (> 6 cycles). ConclusionsPevonedistat in combination with IRN/TMZ is well tolerated in children with solid or CNS tumors. The RP2D of pevonedistat is 35 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, 5 in combination with IRN/TMZ.

Phase 1b study to assess the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of pamiparib in combination with temozolomide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

Pamiparib is a potent, selective, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor that demonstrates synthetic lethality in cells with breast cancer susceptibility gene mutations or other homologous recombination deficiency. This two-stage phase 1b study (NCT03150810) assessed pamiparib in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in adult patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced and metastatic solid tumors. Oral pamiparib 60 mg was administered twice daily. During the dose-escalation stage, increasing doses of TMZ (40-120 mg once daily pulsed or 20-40 mg once daily continuous) were administered to determine the recommended dose to be administered in the dose-expansion stage. The primary objectives were to determine safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated/administered dose, recommended phase 2 dose and schedule, and antitumor activity of pamiparib in combination with TMZ. Pharmacokinetics of pamiparib and TMZ and biomarkers were also assessed. Across stages, 139 patients were treated (dose escalation, n = 66; dose expansion, n = 73). The maximum tolerated dose of TMZ, which was administered during dose expansion, was 7-day pulsed 60 mg once daily. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (dose escalation, 56.1%; dose expansion, 63.0%), nausea (dose escalation, 54.5%; dose expansion, 49.3%), and fatigue (dose escalation, 48.5%; dose expansion, 47.9%). In the dose-escalation stage, four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (three neutropenia and one neutrophil count decreased). No TEAEs considered to be related to study drug treatment resulted in death. Antitumor activity was modest, indicated by confirmed overall response rate (dose escalation, 13.8%; dose expansion, 11.6%), median progression-free survival (3.7 and 2.8 months), and median overall survival (10.5 and 9.2 months). Administration of combination therapy did not notably impact pamiparib or TMZ pharmacokinetics. Pamiparib in combination with TMZ had a manageable safety profile. Further investigation of the efficacy of this combination in tumor types with specific DNA damage repair deficiencies is warranted.

How to sensitize glioblastomas to temozolomide chemotherapy: a gap-centered view.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is a methylating agent used as the first-line drug in the chemotherapy of glioblastomas. However, cancer cells eventually acquire resistance, necessitating the development of TMZ-potentiating therapy agents. TMZ induces several DNA base adducts, including O 6 -meG, 3-meA, and 7-meG. TMZ cytotoxicity stems from the ability of these adducts to directly (3-meA) or indirectly (O 6 -meG) impair DNA replication. Although TMZ toxicity is generally attributed to O 6 -meG, other alkylated bases can be similarly important depending on the status of various DNA repair pathways of the treated cells. In this mini-review we emphasize the necessity to distinguish TMZ-sensitive glioblastomas, which do not express methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and are killed by the futile cycle of mismatch repair (MMR) of the O 6 -meG/T pairs, vs. TMZ-resistant MGMT-positive or MMR-negative glioblastomas, which are selected in the course of the treatment and are killed only at higher TMZ doses by the replication-blocking 3-meA. These two types of cells can be TMZ-sensitized by inhibiting different DNA repair pathways. However, in both cases, the toxic intermediates appear to be ssDNA gaps, a vulnerability also seen in BRCA-deficient cancers. PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which were initially developed to treat BRCA1/2-deficient cancers by synthetic lethality, were re-purposed in clinical trials to potentiate the effects of TMZ. We discuss how the recent advances in our understanding of the genetic determinants of TMZ toxicity might lead to new approaches for the treatment of glioblastomas by inhibiting PARP1 and other enzymes involved in the repair of alkylation damage (e.g., APE1).

Extended dosing (12 cycles) vs conventional dosing (6 cycles) of adjuvant temozolomide in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: a randomized, single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group controlled trial.

Maximum safe surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation and temozolomide chemotherapy is the current standard of care in the management of newly diagnosed high grade glioma. However, there are controversies about the optimal number of adjuvant temozolomide cycles. This study aimed to compare the survival benefits of 12 cycles against 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide adults with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas. Adult patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas, and a Karnofsky performance status>60%, were randomized to receive either 6 cycles or 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were followed-up for assessment of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by brain MRI every 3 months within the first year after treatment and then every six months. A total of 100 patients (6 cycles, 50; 12 cycles, 50) were entered. The rate of treatment completion in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 91.3% and 55.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48-month OS rates in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 81.3% vs 78.8%, 58.3% vs 49.8%, 47.6% vs 34.1%, and 47.6% vs 31.5%, respectively (p-value=.19). Median OS of 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 35 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0 to 58.9) and 23 months (95%CI, 16.9 to 29.0). The 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48- month PFS rates in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 70.8% vs 56.9%, 39.5% and 32.7%, 27.1% vs 28.8%, and 21.1% vs 28.8%, respectively (p=.88). The Median PFS of 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups was 18 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 21.1) and 16 (95% CI, 11.0 to 20.9) months. Patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas treated with adjuvant temozolomide after maximum safe surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation do not benefit from extended adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles. Prospectively registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT20160706028815N3. Date registered: 18/03/14.

Targeting NKG2D ligands in glioblastoma with a bispecific T-cell engager is augmented with conventional therapy and enhances oncolytic virotherapy of glioma stem-like cells

BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) almost invariably becomes resistant towards conventional treatment of radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, partly due to subpopulations of intrinsically resistant glioma stem-like cells (GSC). The oncolytic herpes simplex...

Abstract LB155: Intra-cranial administration of MTL-004, a promising post-resection treatment for glioblastoma

Abstract Objectives Gliomas (GBM), are exceptionally hard to treat, aggressive and genetically heterogeneous tumors. This study reports the control of tumor recurrence and improved survival in male and female rats by combining a single intra-cranial dose of MTL-004 (5-(aziridine-1- yl)-4 hydroxylamino-2-nitrobenzamide), in a bioresorbable paste (a blend of poly DL-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid; (PLGA) and poly ethylene glycol; (PEG)) to surgical resection of primary glioma tumors. Comparison is made with oral temozolomide (TMZ), the current standard of care (SOC), following resection. Experimental procedures On day 0, 2 mm3 tumor fragments were implanted into the brains of healthy female and male Fischer rats. On day 5 rats the growing tumors were removed using microsurgery. Treatments started as follows: •Group 1 (Placebo) received a single intracranial dose of excipient powder in PGLA/PEG paste; •Group 2 (SOC) received 5 daily oral doses of TMZ at 50 mg/kg; •Group 3 (MTL-004) received a single intracranial dose of excipient powder containing 1 mg/kg MTL-004 in PGLA/PEG paste. Results Body Weight Between day 0 and 5, no groups had statistically significant body weight changes. Between days 5 to 9, mean body weight of rats receiving TMZ was significantly reduced. Tumor Volumes Tumor volumes from MRI were evaluated when at least 80% of rats were still alive in each group (day 14 post tumor resection/treatment initiation). Mean tumor volume was significantly higher in the placebo groups compared to MTL-004 and TMZ treatments. Survival Rats were studied for 58-days post tumor resection/treatment. At this time out of twelve rats per group, none or one survived on TMZ, two or no animals were still alive on placebo, and seven or ten rats treated with MTL-004 were still alive (male or female respectively). Post resection median survival time was between 20.5 to 27.5 days for rats treated with oral placebo or TMZ. Rats treated with MTL-004 had a significantly higher survival compared to both placebo and TMZ groups and remained in apparent good health for the 58 days of the study. Conclusions Consistent trends were observed in each group of male and female rats following tumor resection. •PGLA/PEG paste with MTL-004 or without (placebo) or were both well tolerated. •Treatment with MTL-004 in PGLA/PEG paste provided good tumor control, was better tolerated and led to significantly greater survival than oral TMZ or placebo. •Oral TMZ (SOC) provided control of tumor volume but was associated with significant, transient body weight losses and no significant survival gain compared to placebo. Our data highlight significant survival benefits associated with a single intracranial dose of MTL-004 with PLGA/PEG paste post-surgery. In conclusion, surgery followed by MTL-004 in PGLA/PEG paste is a well-tolerated and promising treatment for glioblastoma, suitable for clinical evaluation. Citation Format: Mike Hudson, Sylvie Maubant, Elisabeth Bertrand, Marie Lux, Jordan Longin, Elodie Marie Dit Chatel, Maxime Ramelet, Olivier Duchamp. Intra-cranial administration of MTL-004, a promising post-resection treatment for glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB155.

In Vitro Glioblastoma Model on a Plate for Localized Drug Release Study from a 3D-Printed Drug-Eluted Hydrogel Mesh.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive type of brain tumor that has limited treatment options. Current standard therapies, including surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, are not very effective due to the rapid progression and recurrence of the tumor. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more effective treatments, such as combination therapy and localized drug delivery systems that can reduce systemic side effects. Recently, a handheld printer was developed that can deliver drugs directly to the tumor site. In this study, the feasibility of using this technology for localized co-delivery of temozolomide (TMZ) and deferiprone (DFP) to treat glioblastoma is showcased. A flexible drug-loaded mesh (GlioMesh) loaded with poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticles is printed, which shows the sustained release of both drugs for up to a month. The effectiveness of the printed drug-eluting mesh in terms of tumor toxicity and invasion inhibition is evaluated using a 3D micro-physiological system on a plate and the formation of GBM tumoroids within the microenvironment. The proposed in vitro model can identify the effective combination doses of TMZ and DFP in a sustained drug delivery platform. Additionally, our approach shows promise in GB therapy by enabling localized delivery of multiple drugs, preventing off-target cytotoxic effects.

Comparative assessment of direct and indirect cold atmospheric plasma effects, based on helium and argon, on human glioblastoma: an in vitro and in vivo study

Recent research has highlighted the promising potential of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) in cancer therapy. However, variations in study outcomes are attributed to differences in CAP devices and plasma parameters, which lead to diverse compositions of plasma products, including electrons, charged particles, reactive species, UV light, and heat. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the optimal exposure time, duration, and direction-dependent cellular effects of two CAPs, based on argon and helium gases, on glioblastoma U-87 MG cancer cells and an animal model of GBM. Two plasma jets were used as low-temperature plasma sources in which helium or argon gas was ionized by high voltage (4.5 kV) and frequency (20 kHz). In vitro assessments on human GBM and normal astrocyte cell lines, using MTT assays, flow cytometry analysis, wound healing assays, and immunocytochemistry for Caspase3 and P53 proteins, demonstrated that all studied plasma jets, especially indirect argon CAP, selectively induced apoptosis, hindered tumor cell growth, and inhibited migration. These effects occurred concurrently with increased intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species and decreased total antioxidant capacity in the cells. In vivo results further supported these findings, indicating that single indirect argon and direct helium CAP therapy, equal to high dose Temozolomide treatment, induced tumor cell death in a rat model of GBM. This was concurrent with a reduction in tumor size observed through PET-CT scan imaging and a significant increase in the survival rate. Additionally, there was a decrease in GFAP protein levels, a significant GBM tumor marker, and an increase in P53 protein expression based on immunohistochemical analyses. Furthermore, Ledge beam test analysis revealed general motor function improvement after indirect argon CAP therapy, similar to Temozolomide treatment. Taken together, these results suggest that CAP therapy, using indirect argon and direct helium jets, holds great promise for clinical applications in GBM treatment.

Adoptive cell therapy for high grade gliomas using simultaneous temozolomide and intracranial mgmt-modified γδ t cells following standard post-resection chemotherapy and radiotherapy: current strategy and future directions.

Cellular therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies (CAR-T), while generally successful in hematologic malignancies, face substantial challenges against solid tumors such as glioblastoma (GBM) due to rapid growth, antigen heterogeneity, and inadequate depth of response to cytoreductive and immune therapies, We have previously shown that GBM constitutively express stress associated NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL) recognized by gamma delta (γδ) T cells, a minor lymphocyte subset that innately recognize target molecules via the γδ T cell receptor (TCR), NKG2D, and multiple other mechanisms. Given that NKG2DL expression is often insufficient on GBM cells to elicit a meaningful response to γδ T cell immunotherapy, we then demonstrated that NKG2DL expression can be transiently upregulated by activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway using alkylating agents such as Temozolomide (TMZ). TMZ, however, is also toxic to γδ T cells. Using a p140K/MGMT lentivector, which confers resistance to TMZ by expression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT), we genetically engineered γδ T cells that maintain full effector function in the presence of therapeutic doses of TMZ. We then validated a therapeutic system that we termed Drug Resistance Immunotherapy (DRI) that combines a standard regimen of TMZ concomitantly with simultaneous intracranial infusion of TMZ-resistant γδ T cells in a first-in-human Phase I clinical trial (NCT04165941). This manuscript will discuss DRI as a rational therapeutic approach to newly diagnosed GBM and the importance of repeated administration of DRI in combination with the standard-of-care Stupp regimen in patients with stable minimal residual disease.

Alternative schedule of temozolomide/capecitabine in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

The chemotherapy regimen capecitabine/temozolomide (CAPTEM) is routinely used in neuroendocrine tumors (NET), with antitumor activity particularly demonstrated in pancreatic or high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). However, different dosing regimens are used, and the optimal schedule remains to be defined. This single-center retrospective analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of CAPTEM in patients with NEN using a schedule starting both compounds simultaneously (temozolomide on days 1-5 and capecitabine on days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle) rather than sequentially. The primary parameters of interest were response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicities following this treatment regimen, hereinafter referred to as TEMCAP. The study population comprised 40 patients, half of whom (n = 20) had pancreatic NEN, and 9 patients (22.5%) had pulmonary or thymic NETs. The most common histology was NET G3 (n = 15, 37.5%), and 8 patients (20.0%) had a neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Most patients (77.5%) had at least one prior systemic therapy, and 16 patients (40.0%) prior chemotherapy. The median number of TEMCAP cycles was 6 (range 1-16). Median PFS for the highly heterogeneous population was 13.3 months, while the median overall survival was 31.9 months. In total, 14/36 patients (38.9%) exhibited a partial response, and the disease control rate was 75.0%. The safety profile of TEMCAP (at a below-target mean temozolomide dose of 118.85 mg/m2) in our cohort was remarkably good with no toxicities of grade 3 or 4. Taken together, the results of this analysis further support the use of temozolomide/capecitabine in NEN and prompt further assessment of our modified TEMCAP schedule.

Abstract A002: The utility of pre-clinical trials in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) models for informing clinical trial development of therapeutic strategies

Abstract Large PDX collections provide broad representation of tumor genetics and are commonly used to evaluate the clinical potential of novel therapeutic strategies. In many solid malignancies, profound benefit in PDX preclinical studies has foreshadowed eventual FDA approval of clinically impactful therapeutics. With a lack of corresponding progress in glioblastoma (GBM), the value of PDX testing has been questioned. Mayo Clinic has developed 111 GBM PDXs from newly diagnosed (72 PDX) and recurrent (39 PDX) patients, and over the past 23 years, we have used this collection for extensive in vivo preclinical testing of 145 drugs in both orthotopic and heterotopic settings. As part of this work, the impact of standard of care therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab was evaluated in orthotopic models using clinically relevant dosing regimens. For each animal study, the ratio of median survival for treated vs. control animals were used to define a ‘survival ratio’ as a normalized metric of benefit. TMZ efficacy was evaluated in 26 newly diagnosed GBM PDXs, with equal representation of MGMT methylated and unmethylated tumors. As expected, MGMT methylated PDXs were much more sensitive to TMZ as compared to unmethylated PDXs (median survival ratio 4.47 vs 1.48, respectively), and similar to clinical experience, 2 MGMT unmethylated PDXs were markedly sensitive to TMZ, while 1 MGMT methylated PDX was relatively resistant. In a more limited study, dose-dense vs. standard TMZ dosing was compared in 7 PDXs (4 MGMT methylated, 3 MGMT unmethylated). In a pooled analysis of all lines, both standard (HR=0.09; 95% CI: 0.06–0.14) and dose-dense TMZ therapy (HR=0.09; 95% CI: 0.06–0.14) were superior to vehicle controls (p<0.001). Similar to the clinical results in the Phase III randomized RTOG 0525 trial, survival with the dose-dense TMZ was no different than standard dosing (p=0.88, HR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.72-1.32). In an analysis of bevacizumab across 32 PDXs, mice were dosed once a week until moribund, and a minimum overall median survival benefit of 20% was used to define ‘responders’. Thirteen PDXs met this criterion, although the overall survival ratio among this subset was limited (range 1.21-1.65). Only 2 models had a 50% or greater survival benefit. Stratification by disease state (24 newly diagnosed vs 8 recurrent) showed equivalent performance (median survival benefit 1.13 for both). These results are consistent with the limited survival benefit observed with bevacizumab and the RTOG 0825 clinical trial. In summary, the results from these relatively inexpensive PDX studies demonstrate the potential of pre-clinical PDX trials to evaluate the extent of benefit and fraction of responsive PDXs to a novel therapeutic. If analyzed across an ‘adequate’ number of PDXs, these results potentially can be used to identify predictive biomarkers or to compare various treatment regimens prior to clinical testing. Citation Format: Danielle M Burgenske, Ann C Mladek, Katrina K Bakken, Zeng Hu, Brett L Carlson, Paul A Decker, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Jann N Sarkaria. The utility of pre-clinical trials in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) models for informing clinical trial development of therapeutic strategies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A002.

Dispensing Oral Temozolomide in Children: Precision and Stability of a Novel and Ready to Use Liquid Formulation in Comparison with Capsule Derived Mixtures.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is part of the therapeutic armamentarium used in managing pediatric cancers; however, available oral forms (capsules) are not adapted for use in children. Our aim was to assess the dose accuracy and stability of TMZ using capsule contents mixed with food compared with a novel, ready-to-use liquid formulation specifically developed for children (Ped-TMZ, brand name KIZFIZO). Dose accuracy and TMZ stability testing were performed with TMZ capsule contents (90 mg) mixed with food vehicles (apple juice, apple sauce, cream, milk, and mashed potatoes) and compared to an equivalent dose of Ped-TMZ. Acceptance criteria were predefined for TMZ (95.0-105.0%) and its degradation product amino-imidazole-carboxamide (AIC; <1%) content. The delivered dose was significantly higher using Ped-TMZ (96.6 ± 1.2%) and within the predefined criteria for TMZ content, whereas it was systematically under the lower specifications of 95% using capsule-derived preparations with apple juice (91.0 ± 1.5%) and apple sauce (91.6 ± 1.4%), respectively (p < 0.0001). In chemical stability tests, the four food vehicles (apple sauce, cream, milk, mashed potatoes) had a significant effect on TMZ stability (p = 0.0042), and the AIC significantly increased with time in three of the four vehicles (p < 0.0001). Only 1/72 of preparations from capsules met the predefined acceptance criteria, whereas Ped-TMZ showed no TMZ loss, and the AIC remained within specifications. In conclusion, mixing TMZ capsule content with food may result in significant underexposure, possibly even greater in routine practice, as complete food intake by the child is unlikely.

CTNI-41. PHASE II AND PHASE 0 RESULTS OF ABTC 1801: A MULTI-ARM CLINICAL TRIAL OF THE PARP INHIBITOR PAMIPARIB WITH VERY LOW DOSE METRONOMIC TEMOZOLOMIDE IN RECURRENT IDH MUTANT GLIOMAS

Abstract BACKGROUND Preclinical studies have demonstrated that IDH1-mutant (IDHmt) gliomas harbor a BRCAness phenotype with a defect in homologous recombination that confers PARP inhibitor sensitivity. METHODS The phase II component of ABTC 1801 examined the efficacy of the combination of pamiparib (BeiGene BGB-290) with low dose metronomic temozolomide in recurrent IDHmt grade 2 and 3 gliomas. In this two-stage design, Arm A enrolled patients who had failed two lines and Arm B a single line of alkylator therapy. Pamiparib and temozolomide doses based on phase I results was 60 mg BID and 20 mg daily. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS 39 patients (Arm A 15, Arm B 24) enrolled in the phase II. Median age was 45 (range: 25-69), 56% male, and median KPS 90. 72% of tumors were MGMT methylated. There were no confirmed responses in Arm A and one in Arm B; neither arm met the threshold for additional accrual. One-third of subjects discontinued treatment for reasons other than progressive disease. Estimated median PFS was 5.8 months in Arm A and 11.3 months in Arm B. Seven subjects (Arm A 3, Arm B 4) developed DLT during treatment. Grade 3+ toxicity was principally hematologic; 9 patients had grade 3 anemia, 7 grade 3 and 3 grade 4 neutropenia, and 3 grade 3 thrombocytopenia. In enhancing and non-enhancing tumors from 8 surgical arm patients, median unbound drug tumor/plasma ratios were 0.98 and 0.92, respectively; and median unbound pamiparib tumor concentrations were 209 and 188 nmol/L (or nmol/kg), respectively, which were &amp;gt;20-fold the in vitro IC50 for PARP inhibition. CONCLUSIONS While pamiparib appeared to achieve sufficient pharmacologically active concentrations in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, combination with temozolomide did not produce a meaningful ORR in IDHmt recurrent gliomas. Cumulative hematologic toxicity was substantial.