Doses Of Somatostatin Receptor Ligands Research Articles

Presurgical somatostatin receptor ligand treatment does not affect tumor consistency in GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas.

PurposeTo evaluate whether presurgical treatment using long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) may change pituitary tumor consistency and improve surgical outcome in GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas.MethodsRetrospective study of 40 patients with GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas operated for the first time by endoscopic transsphenoidal approach. Tumor consistency was evaluated intraoperatively and then correlated with histopathological fibrosis parameters and surgical outcomes. Surgical remission was reported based on the 2010 criteria.ResultsThe mean tumor size of GH-secreting macroadenomas was of 16.9 ± 8.2 mm and 25 were invasive pituitary adenomas (PAs). Presurgical treatment with long-acting SRL was performed in 17 patients (11 lanreotide, 6 octreotide). The cure rate was higher in those patients pre-treated with monthly doses ≥30 mg of octreotide or ≥90 mg of lanreotide than in those treated with lower doses or untreated (8/11 (72.7%) vs 11/29 (37.9%), P = 0.049). However, although the proportion of soft tumors increased as higher doses of SRL were considered in the pre-treated group, no statistical significance was reached, even when the highest approved monthly doses were used (6/6 (100%) vs 23/34 (67.7%), P = 0.102). Moreover, we found that the remission rate was similar between fibrous and soft tumors (P = 0.873) and also of surgical complications (P = 0.859), despite of the higher prevalence of Knosp >2 (P = 0.035) and very large PA (P = 0.025) in fibrous tumors than in soft tumors.ConclusionsAlthough presurgical treatment with high doses of SRL was associated with a 2.2-fold greater chance of surgical remission, this benefit was not related with changes in tumor consistency induced by the presurgical treatment.

Patient reported outcome data from acromegaly patients treated with injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) in routine clinical practice

BackgroundAcromegaly patients managed on Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), the most common first-line pharmacotherapy for acromegaly, may still experience acromegaly symptoms such as headache, sweating, fatigue, soft tissue swelling, and joint pain, even those with normal IGF-1. Additionally, treatment with SRLs may cause injection site reactions and other side effects such as gastro-intestinal (GI) symptoms. This study utilized patient-reported outcome measures to examine the burden associated with acromegaly and its treatment for patients receiving a stable dose of long-acting SRLs in routine clinical practice.MethodsUS acromegaly patients on a stable dose of SRL seen by their treating healthcare provider in the past 12 months completed a one-time online survey including the Acro-TSQ, an acromegaly-specific tool for assessing symptom burden and treatment satisfaction and convenience.ResultsOne hundred five patients were enrolled (mean age 49.9 years, 79.1% female). Patients experienced numerous symptoms, including > 80% who experienced joint pain, acro-fog, swelling of soft tissue, and fatigue/weakness. Many symptoms occurred constantly, while some occurred at the end of the injection cycle, even among those with IGF-1 < = 1.0 ULN. Injection site reactions were common. Patients were moderately satisfied with their current treatment; symptoms and side effects often affected daily activities. On average, patients reported > 3 acromegaly provider visits/year.ConclusionsDespite receiving a stable dose of SRL and regular visits with an acromegaly healthcare provider, US acromegaly patients in routine clinical practice, and even the subgroup with normal IGF-1, report significant burden of disease and treatment.

MON-LB53 Prior Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligand Dose Does Not Predict Oral Octreotide Response In The Treatment Of Acromegaly: Results From The Phase 3 OPTIMAL Study

Background: Injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are the most widely used therapy to control acromegaly. Oral octreotide capsules have been formulated as a potential therapy for this disorder and the efficacy and safety was evaluated in the CHIASMA OPTIMAL prospective phase 3 study in patients with acromegaly who were controlled on injectable SRL treatment of varying doses (Samson et al. ENDO 2020). Methods: Patients with confirmed acromegaly, who had been receiving a stable dose of injectable SRL (≥3 months) up until study entry, were randomized to receive octreotide capsules (40 mg/day) or placebo for 36 weeks. Patients were dose titrated to 60 or 80 mg of oral octreotide or equivalent placebo through week 24 at the investigator’s discretion based on increase of IGF-I levels or worsening of acromegaly signs and symptoms. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained their biochemical response at the end of 36 weeks, defined as average IGF-I ≤1 x ULN between Weeks 34 and 36. An analysis evaluated maintenance of response based on prior dose of injectable SRL. Prior doses of injectable SRL were categorized based on the following classifications: octreotide 10 mg every 4 weeks or lanreotide 60 mg every 4 weeks or 120 mg every 8 weeks were stratified as low; octreotide 20 mg every 4 weeks or lanreotide 90 mg every 4 weeks or 120 mg every 6 weeks were stratified as medium; octreotide 30 mg or 40 mg or lanreotide 120 mg every 4 weeks were stratified as high. Randomization was stratified based on low dose vs med/high dose and efficacy results compared for these strata. The response rates reported for the primary end point are slightly adjusted for stratification differences as prespecified in the statistical analysis plan. Results: Six patients (21.4%) in the octreotide capsule group had received prior treatment with low doses of injectable SRLs while 22 (78.6%) had received prior treatment with medium-high doses of injectable SRLs. Maintenance of response was observed in 16 patients receiving oral octreotide. This included 66.7% of patients (n=4) previously receiving low doses of injected SRLs and 54.5% of patients (n=12) on medium-high injected doses. The treatment effect was consistent irrespective of prior dose of injectable SRL (odds ratio: 5.4 in low dose and 5.9 in medium-high dose). Conclusion: The CHIASMA OPTIMAL study recruited a population receiving predominantly medium-high doses of injectable SRLs and demonstrated maintenance of response in 58% of patients. Oral octreotide treatment effect was consistent irrespective of prior dose of injectable SRL.

MON-LB55 Biochemical Control of Most Patients Reverting to Injectable Long-Acting Somatostatin Receptor Ligands Is Achieved After One Dose: Results From the Phase 3, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Optimal Study

Background: Injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are currently the most widely used medical therapy for acromegaly worldwide. Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) have been formulated as a potential therapy for this disorder and the safety and efficacy were evaluated in the CHIASMA OPTIMAL pivotal study (Samson et al. ENDO 2020). As reported, mean IGF-I levels of the OOC treatment group were maintained within normal range at the end of treatment in all patients. However, some patients may not respond to OOC treatment (25% of OOC group and 68% of placebo groups required rescue, P=0.003). This analysis describes the degree and rapidity with which patients achieve biochemical control (IGF-I ≤1.0 x ULN) when reverted to their prior injectable SRL treatment. Methods: Patients with confirmed acromegaly and receiving a stable dose of injectable SRL (≥3 months) were randomized to OOC (40mg/day; N=28) or placebo (N=28) for 36 weeks. Patients were dose titrated to 60 or 80mg of OOC (or placebo) through week 24 at investigator discretion based on increased IGF-I levels and/or worsening acromegaly signs/symptoms. Patients could be rescued via reversion to prior injectable SRL therapy if they met the predefined withdrawal criteria (i.e., IGF-I ≥1.3 x upper limit of normal [ULN] for 2 consecutive visits on the highest dose, and exacerbation of clinical signs/symptoms) or discontinued treatment early for any other reason. In the study, 7 patients in the OOC group and 19 in the placebo group required rescue. The change in IGF-I from Baseline was compared to the end of the Double-blind Placebo Controlled period. Results: In patients rescued up to week 32 and in whom there were at least 4 weeks of follow up, baseline IGF-I levels (mean of Screening Visit 2 and Baseline) were 0.80 and 0.87 x ULN in the OOC and placebo groups, respectively. In patients receiving rescue therapy, the end of study IGF-I levels (mean of week 34 and 36) were 0.80 and 0.89 x ULN in the OOC and placebo groups, respectively, virtually unchanged. The median time to return to normal baseline IGF-I values following loss of response was 4.0 weeks after discontinuing OOC and 4.0 weeks after discontinuing placebo treatment. Therefore, most patients who required rescue following a short trial of therapy with OOC returned to their baseline values following a single SRL injection. Conclusion: Most treatment failures in the CHIASMA OPTIMAL trial (on either OOC or placebo) rescued with injectable SRL re-established their baseline response levels after a single injectable SRL administration (at pre-study dose). Based on this data, patients may potentially be treated with OOC and for those not responding, either not biochemically controlled or who have adverse effects, they may be able to return to injectable SRLs with immediate IGF-I control after one SRL injection.

Observed discordance between outcomes reported by acromegaly patients and their treating endocrinology medical provider

BackgroundAcromegaly patients, even those with IGF-1 values within the normal range receiving somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), often suffer from significant symptoms. It is not known to what extent patients’ medical providers are aware of the frequency and severity of acromegaly symptoms or level of treatment satisfaction with SRLs. This study sought to examine the concordance between outcomes reported by acromegaly patients treated with long-acting SRLs and those perceived by their medical provider.MethodsUS acromegaly patients on a stable dose of SRL and seen by their medical provider in the past year completed an online survey which included the Acro-TSQ. Their medical providers were interviewed about the perception of their patient’s symptoms, level of control, and general health, and completed relevant portions of the Acro-TSQ. Concordance between patient and medical provider reported data was examined.ResultsMedical providers reported that their patients experienced acromegaly symptoms on a regular basis, however, there was poor agreement between patients and medical providers on the frequency, severity, and pattern of symptoms, as well as on the severity of injection site reactions and multiple domains of the Acro-TSQ, with patients generally reporting symptoms and injection site reactions more often and with higher severity than medical providers.ConclusionsMedical providers were aware that their patients who were receiving a stable dose of SRL regularly experienced acromegaly symptoms. Addressing discordance in patient- and medical provider-reported frequency and severity of acromegaly symptoms and injection site reactions by facilitating better communication may improve care of acromegaly patients.