Doses Of Proton Pump Inhibitors Research Articles

Determinant factors for first-line treatment choice and effectiveness in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis: an analysis of the EUREOS EoE CONNECT registry.

This study compared short-term effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC), and dietary therapies in reversing clinical and histological features in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitits (EoE). Determinants for treatment choice and PPI therapy effectiveness were also assessed. A cross-sectional study analysis of patients under 18years old recruited onto the multicenter EoE CONNECT registrywas performed. Clinico-histological response was defined as symptomatic improvement plus a peak eosinophil count below 15 per high-power field after treatment. Effectiveness of first-line options used in monotherapy was compared. Overall, 393 patients (64% adolescents) receiving PPI, STC, or dietary monotherapy to induce EoE remission were identified. PPI was the preferred option (71.5%), despite STC providing the highest clinico-histological response rates (66%) compared to PPI (44%) and diet (42%). Logistic regression identified fibrotic features and recruitment at Italian sites independently associated to first-line STC treatment; age under 12 associated to dietary therapy over other options. Analysis of 262 patients in whom PPI effectiveness was evaluated after median (IQR) 96 (70-145) days showed that this effectiveness was significantly associated with management at pediatric facilities and use of high PPI doses. Among PPI responders, decrease in rings and structures in endoscopy from baseline was documented, with EREFS fibrotic subscore for rings also decreasing among responders (0.27 ± 0.63 vs. 0.05 ± 0.22, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Initial therapy choice for EoE depends on endoscopic phenotype, patient's age, and patients' origin. High PPI doses and treatment in pediatric facilities significantly determined effectiveness, and reversed fibrotic endoscopic features among responders. What is Known: • Proton pump inhibitors are widely used to induce and maintain remission in EoE in real practice, despite other first-line alternative therapies possibly providing higher effectiveness. What is New: • Proton pump inhibitors represent up to two-thirds of first-line monotherapies used to induce EoE remission in pediatric and adolescent patients with EoE. The choice of STC as first-line treatment for EoE was significantly associated with fibrotic features at baseline endoscopy and recruitment in Italian centers; age less than 12 years was associated with dietary therapy. • PPI effectiveness was found to be determined by use of high doses, attendance at pediatric facilities, presenting inflammatory instead of fibrotic or mixed phenotypes, and younger age. Among responders, PPI therapy reversed both inflammatory and fibrotic features of EoE after short-term treatment.

#2824 Use of proton pump inhibitors is not associated with post-dialysis fatigue and time of recovery after dialysis in patients on chronic hemodialysis

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic hemodialysis is often associated with post-dialysis fatigue (PDF), a condition characterized by extreme tiredness and lack of energy. PDF is a debilitating symptom that significantly impairs quality of life of hemodialysis patients. Furthermore, PDF is independently associated with the time to recover after dialysis (TIRD), which can be used as an indirect measure of PDF. Recent studies have shown that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is independently associated with the prevalence and severity of fatigue in kidney transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of PPIs in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis is associated with PDF prevalence and characteristics, as well as the TIRD. Method For this retrospective study, we recruited patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis and asked open-ended questions about their post-dialysis fatigue and time of recovery. Each patient was asked to rate the intensity, duration and frequency of their PDF on a scale of 1 to 5. We defined whether patients used a PPI (no PPI use or PPI use), the type of PPI used, the dose of PPI used, and the duration of the PPI use (&amp;lt;1 year or ≥1year). Results The study analysed 346 patients, of whom 259 used PPIs (55 used omeprazole, 63 esomeprazole, 54 pantoprazole, 87 lansoprazole, and 7 rabeprazole) and 87 did not. Among the patients, 232 reported suffering from PDF, while 114 did not. The median [min-max] TIRD was 210 minutes [0-1440]. The prevalence of PDF in PPI users and non-users was 67% and 68%, respectively (p= 0.878). There was no significant difference in the median [min-max] TIRD between PPI users and non-users (180 [0-1440] and 240 [0-1440], respectively; p=0.871). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the median PDF intensity, duration, frequency, and severity PPI users and non-users. The prevalence of PDF was similar among the different types of PPI used and did not differ with respect to PPI non-users. Duration of PPI exposure was &amp;lt;1 year in 42 patients and ≥1 year in 224 patients. There was no difference in prevalence of PDF between the two exposures. The correlation matrix showed no statistical significance between PPI equivalent dose, treatment duration, PDF frequency, PDF characteristics, and TIRD. Conclusion There is no association between the use of PPIs and PDF or time of recovery after dialysis in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Proton pump inhibitor therapy after transcatheter angiography in refractory nonvariceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients: a cohort study.

Transcatheter angiography (TA) could help to diagnose and treat refractory nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the key medication for reducing the rebleeding rate and mortality and are usually continued after TA. It is unknown whether high-dose PPIs after TA are more effective than the standard regimen. We retrospectively collected data from patients who received TA because of refractory NVUGIB from 2010 to 2020 at West China Hospital. 244 patients were included and divided into two groups based on the first 3 days of PPIs treatment. All baseline characteristics were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The 30-day all-cause mortality, rebleeding rate and other outcomes were compared. The propensity score matching method was also used to verify the results. There were 86 patients in the high-dose group and 158 in the standard group. The average daily doses of PPI were 192.1 ± 17.9mg and 77.8 ± 32.0mg, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed no difference in the 30-day all-cause mortality (aHR 1.464, 95% CI 0.829 to 2.584) or rebleeding rate (aHR 1.020, 95% CI 0.693 to 1.501). There were no differences found in red blood cell transfusion, hospital stay length and further interventions, including endoscopy, repeating TA, surgery and ICU admission. The results were consistent in the subgroup analysis of patients with transcatheter arterial embolization. In refractory NVUGIB patients who received TA, regardless of whether embolization was performed, high-dose PPI treatment did not provide additional benefits compared with the standard regimen.

Awareness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Adverse Events and Treatment Pattern Change According to Physician Practice: A National Questionnaire Study in Korea.

Although adverse events of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been reported, there are few studies on physicians' perceptions. We aimed to investigate physicians' awareness of PPI-related adverse events and changes in treatment patterns according to their practice. We conducted an online survey of physicians using a 15-item questionnaire. The survey queried respondents' demographic information, PPI prescription patterns, perceptions, and concerns on the reported PPI-related adverse events. Concerns regarding the adverse events of PPI were assessed by dividing them into possibilities and medical causality. Of the 450 respondents, 430 were specialists, and 232 were gastroenterologists. A total of 87.8% of the respondents were generally or well aware of the adverse effects of PPI, 29.1% considered side effects when prescribing PPI, and 14.6% explained them to patients. Specialists were more aware of the side effects of PPI than general practitioners (p = 0.005), and gastroenterologists were more aware of the side effects of PPI than non-gastroenterologists (p < 0.001). However, gastroenterologists explained less to patients (p = 0.001) and preferred to reduce the dose of PPI rather than discontinue it. The adverse events that were recognized as having the highest probability of occurrence and strongest association with PPI use were bone diseases, Clostridium difficile infection, gastrointestinal infection, pneumonia, and interactions with anti-thrombotic drugs. Physicians' awareness of PPI-related adverse events and treatment patterns differed significantly according to their positions and practice. Although a number of adverse events of PPIs were reported, physicians seem to accept their significance differently according to their specialty and practice patterns.

Impact of medication dosage on Helicobacter pylori eradication rates among pediatric patients.

Helicobacter pylori rates of eradication to common first-line regimens continue to decline globally. Prescription of the appropriate medication dosage is an important consideration, particularly in the pediatric population due to medication weight-based dosing. Limited data is available on the impact of guideline-recommended weight-based dosing on the successful eradication of H. pylori in children. Retrospective study of patients with histologic evidence of H. pylori from two pediatric tertiary care centers in New England. We excluded patients who were not treated or those missing eradication data. We compared the eradication rates of patients prescribed recommended weight-based dosages, duration, and frequency of treatment with those who were not. One hundred forty-four patients were included. The overall eradication rate was 73.6% (106/144). All treatment regimens were properly prescribed for 14 days. There was a high rate of improper weight-based dosing: proton pump inhibitor (PPI) 31.2% (45/144), amoxicillin 31.7% (39/123), metronidazole (MET) 19.4% (12/62), clarithromycin (CLA) 23.9% (22/70), tetracycline 50% (6/12), bismuth 26.1% (6/23). When PPIs were properly weight-dosed, there was a 78.8% eradication rate that dropped to 62.2% with suboptimal dosing (p = 0.036, OR: 2.26, CI: 1.04-4.87). When amoxicillin was properly weight-dosed, successful eradication was achieved in 81% versus only 53.8% when improperly dosed (p = 0.002; OR: 3.64, CI: 1.58-8.37). There was no statistically significant impact on eradication rates with improper weight-based dosing of MET, CLA, tetracycline, or bismuth. Proper weight-based dosing of amoxicillin and PPI is important for the successful eradication of H. pylori among children in the New England area.

Side effects of proton pump inhibitors with long-term use: focus on the urinary system

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective drugs for treating acid-related diseases. In recent decades, the use of PPIs has increased exponentially. For a long time, PPIs were considered completely safe drugs for both short-term and long-term use. However, modern clinical guidelines note that when prescribing PPIs in large doses for a long period, the possibility of side effects should be taken into account. In recent years, a number of foreign reviews have been published that examine the associations between PPIs and a number of diseases/conditions. We searched the PubMed and Scopus information databases for publications on the safety of PPI use, including sources up to January 30, 2024. In this review, we examined the effect of long-term use of PPIs on the urinary system. This review demonstrates possible changes in the urinary system and an increased risk of developing nephrolithiasis, acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal failure with long-term use of PPIs, which should certainly be taken into account when prescribing them for a long period, especially in patients with comorbid pathology.

Cardiovascular risk with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: myth or reality. A review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective drugs for treating acid-related diseases. In recent decades, the use of PPIs has increased exponentially. From gastroenterological practice, PPIs are being actively introduced into other specialties, in particular in cardiology and rheumatology, where they are used to protect the mucous membrane of the gastrointestinal tract and prevent gastrointestinal bleeding during long-term antithrombotic therapy and long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. For a long time, PPIs were considered completely safe drugs for both short-term and long-term use. However, modern clinical guidelines note that when prescribing PPIs in large doses for a long period, the possibility of side effects should be taken into account. In recent years, a number of foreign reviews have been published that examine the relationship between PPIs and a number of diseases/conditions, including the question of a possible association of PPI use with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications, but note the inconsistency of these data. We searched the PubMed and Scopus information databases for publications on the safety of PPI use, including sources up to 12/01/2023. In this review, we examined the possible cardiovascular risk of long-term use of PPIs. Analysis of publications, despite a number of contradictions, allows us to conclude that the cardiovascular risk with long-term use of PPIs is real and must be taken into account when prescribing PPIs for a long period and to comorbid/multimorbid patients.

Effect of long-term proton pump inhibitors on phosphocalcium metabolism and bone mineral density.

Aim: Although Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are well-tolerated, their long-term use may be associated with decreased bone mass. Methods: This is a case-control study including patients treated with PPIs (>1year) and control subjects who have not received PPIs treatment. Results: A total of 90 patients and 90 matched controls were included. PPIs use was associated with hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia. Vitamin D3 deficiency and hyperparathyroidism were associated with PPIs use. Long-term PPIs use was significantly associated with decreased bone density. Risk factors of decreased bone mineral density (BMD) included age >50years, menopause, lack of sun exposure, double PPIs dose, daily intake, post-meal intake and association with a mucoprotective agent. Conclusion: Our results highlight the risk of decreased BMD in patients on long-term PPIs treatment.

Proton-Pump Inhibitors in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Review Focused on the Role of Pharmacogenetics.

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most administered first-line treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, only around half of EoE patients respond histologically to a double dosage of PPI. In addition, 70% of responders maintain EoE in remission after tapering the PPI dose. In order to avoid endoscopy with biopsies-the only accurate method of assessing PPI response-efforts have been made to identify PPI responder patients. The clinical or endoscopic features and biomarkers evaluated so far, however, have not proven to be sufficient in predicting PPI response. Although new approaches based on omics technologies have uncovered promising biomarkers, the specialized and complex procedures required are difficult to implement in clinical settings. Alternatively, PPI pharmacogenetics based on identifying variations in CYP2C19 and STAT6 genes have shown promising results in EoE, and could easily be performed in most laboratories. Other genetic variations have also been associated with PPI response and may explain those cases not related to CYP2C19 or STAT6. Here, we provide an overview of PPI treatment in EoE and evidence of how genetic variations in CYP2C19 and other genes could affect PPI effectiveness, and also discuss studies evaluating the role of pharmacogenetics in predicting PPI response in patients with EoE.

Influence of novel CYP2C-haplotype on proton pump inhibitor pharmacokinetics in children.

In this brief report, we provide an analysis of the influence of a novel CYP2C haplotype (CYP2C:TG) on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) pharmacokinetics (PK) in children. The CYP2C:TG haplotype has been proposed to be associated with increased CYP2C19 activity. We sought to determine if this CYP2C:TG haplotype resulted in similar alterations in metabolism for proton pump inhibitors, which are primarily metabolized by CYP2C19. In a cohort of 41 children aged 6-21 participating in a PPI pharmacokinetic study, effects of the CYP2C:TG allele were assessed by fitting two linear regression models for each of the six PK outcomes assessed, the second of which accounted for the presence of the CYP2C:TG allele. The difference in R2 values between the two models was computed to quantify the variability in the outcome that could be accounted for by the CYP2C:TG allele after adjustment for the CYP2C19 genotype. We found the CYP2C:TG haplotype to have no measurable additive impact on CYP2C19-mediated metabolism of PPIs invivo in older children and adolescents. The findings of this study do not support the clinical utility of routine testing for the CYP2C:TG haplotype to guide PPI dose adjustments in children.

Relationship between CYP2C19 genotypes and proton pump inhibitorsʹs pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: review

The purpose of this review is to provide clinicians with information and a concise interpretation of the results of pharmacogenetic testing for the cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype when choosing a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dosage. PPIs are widely used for the treatment and prevention of common gastrointestinal diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastric and duodenal ulcers, erosive esophagitis, and other hypersecretory conditions. Most PPIs are metabolized predominantly by cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) to form inactive metabolites, and the CYP2C19 genotype determines the action of PPIs, their efficacy and possible side effects. In clinical practice, a gastroenterologist or therapist is faced with problems of insufficient effectiveness or the development of adverse reactions when prescribing PPIs. Thus, consideration of CYP2C19 genotype appears to be necessary to determine the optimal PPI dosing regimen. The above served as a reason for generalizing in the presented review of literature data on the prescription of PPIs depending on the CYP2C19 genotype.

THE FOCUS ON INCREASED RISK OF FRACTURES IN THEIR PROLONGED USE

Proton pump inhibitors are the most effective drugs for the treatment of acid-dependent diseases. For a long time, proton pump inhibitors have been considered to be completely safe drugs both for short-term and long-term use. A number of modern clinical studies note that when prescribing proton pump inhibitors in high doses for a long time, the possibility of side effects should be taken into account. The purpose of the review is to study the effect of prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors on the condition of bone tissue and the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Materials and methods. A search was conducted in the PubMed and Scopus information databases for publications on the safety of using proton pump inhibitors, including sources published before December 1, 2023, with an emphasis on the influence of proton pump inhibitors on bone tissue and the possible risk of fractures. Results. According to numerous studies, prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors is associated with an increased risk of fractures of the hip, vertebrae and the wrist. An increased risk of fractures may be associated with hypergastrinemia and hypochlorhydria (due to inhibition of acid secretion by proton pump inhibitors), and electrolyte disorders (hypocalcemia). Conclusions. All the pros and cons of prescribing proton pump inhibitors in patients with a history of fractures associated with osteoporosis should be carefully considered. In the curation of comorbid/multimorbid patients, proton pump inhibitors should be used if medically required for as short duration as possible and at the minimum effective dose to relieve symptoms.

A210 ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS PAPILLOMATOSIS AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION

Abstract Background Squamous papillomatosis is a rare benign epithelial finding, generally found incidentally in the distal esophagus. The pathophysiology is not well understood but felt to be secondary to reflux and chemical irritation leading to leukoplakia and verrucous hyperplasia of the epithelium and papilloma formation. Aims To present a case of esophageal squamous papillomatosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and early esophageal cancer. Methods Case report and review of the literature Results A 78-year-old male with C3M3 BE and previous band mucosectomy for nodular dysplasia was referred for ESD of an early esophageal cancer. ESD was successfully performed, with histopathology identifying a low-risk well-differentiated intramucosal adenocarcinoma without lymphovascular invasion and negative margins. Radiofrequency ablation was performed 3-months post-resection for residual BE. Subsequent surveillance gastroscopy 6 months post-resection identified extensive fleshy pink granulation tissue at the ESD scar, histopathology revealing SP. This was confirmed on subsequent repeat gastroscopy and biopsy. Compliance with double dose proton pump inhibitor therapy was confirmed. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of SP developing post-ESD and RFA; further expanding our knowledge of potential Barrett’s endotherapy-related adverse events. Funding Agencies None

Twice-Daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Induces Higher Remission Rate in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Than Once-Daily Regimen Regardless of Total Daily Dose.

The optimal proton pump inhibitor (PPI) regimen for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is unclear. We compared histologic response rates of different dosing combinations. A total of 305 patients with newly diagnosed EoE received standard (omeprazole 20 mg daily), once-daily moderate (40 mg daily), twice-daily moderate (20 mg twice daily), or high (40 mg twice daily) dose PPI for ≥8 weeks. Approximately 42.3% achieved histologic response to PPI, with higher rates for twice-daily (moderate 52.8%/high 54.3%) than once-daily (standard 11.8%/moderate 10%) dosing ( P < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, twice-daily moderate (adjusted odds ratio 6.75, confidence interval 2.53-18.0, P = 0.0008) and high (adjusted odds ratio 12.8, confidence interval 4.69-34.8, P < 0.0001) doses independently predicted histologic response. Twice-daily PPI is associated with higher EoE histologic response rates than once-daily regimen.

In adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, is twice-daily proton pump inhibitor dosing more effective than once-daily dosing in relieving symptoms?

In adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, is twice-daily proton pump inhibitor dosing more effective than once-daily dosing in relieving symptoms?

Prevalence and risk factors for medication-refractory reflux esophagitis in patients with systemic sclerosis in Japan.

Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) often have esophageal motility abnormalities and weak esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) barrier function, which causes proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory reflux esophagitis (RE). The aims of this study were to clarify the current management of RE and prevalence and risk factors of medication-refractory RE in patients with SSc in Japan. A total of 188 consecutive patients with SSc who underwent both esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were reviewed. The presence of RE and grades of the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) were assessed. Esophageal motility was assessed retrospectively according to the Chicago classification v3.0. When RE was seen on a standard dose of PPI or any dose of vonoprazan (VPZ), it was defined as medication-refractory RE. Approximately 80% of patients received maintenance therapy with acid secretion inhibitors regardless of esophageal motility abnormalities. Approximately 50% of patients received maintenance therapy with PPI, and approximately 30% of patients received VPZ. Medication-refractory RE was observed in 30 patients (16.0%). In multivariable analyses, the number of EGD and absent contractility were significant risk factors for medication-refractory RE. Furthermore, combined absent contractility and GEFV grade III or IV had higher odds ratios than did absent contractility alone. Patients with persistent reflux symptoms and those with absent contractility and GEFV grade III or IV should receive maintenance therapy with strong acid inhibition to prevent medication-refractory RE.

CURRENT PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common reason for presentation to the hospital. Appropriate resuscitation followed by endoscopic assessment and endotherapy for high-risk lesions (active bleeding or non-bleeding with visible vessels) forms the cornerstone of management. Pharmacological therapies are utilised at each stage of management in both variceal and non-variceal bleeding. Proton pump inhibitors and prokinetic agents can be administered pre-endoscopically with vasoactive medication and antibiotics utilised in suspected variceal bleeding. Epinephrine may be used as a temporising measure to improve visualisation during endoscopy but should not applied as a single agent. Topical endoscopic therapies have also shown promise in achieving haemostasis. Following endoscopy, a high dose of proton pump inhibitor should be given to patients who require endotherapy and vasoactive medications, and antibiotics continued in confirmed variceal bleeds. The timing of resumption of antithrombotic medication is dependent on the agent utilised and underlying thrombotic risk.

Potential risk of proton pump inhibitors for Parkinson’s disease: A nationwide nested case-control study

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is a potential risk factor for neurodegenerative disease development; however, its role in Parkinson’s disease (PD) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between PPI use and PD risk. A total of 31,326 patients with newly diagnosed PD were matches by age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, and hypertension with 125,304 controls at a ratio of 1:4. The data were collected from the Korean National Health Insurance Services Database from January 2010 to December 2019. Cumulative defined daily doses of PPIs were extracted from treatment claims. We examined the association between PPI use and PD risk using conditional logistic regression. To prevent protopathic bias, we excluded patients diagnosed with PD within a 1-year lag period after PPI exposure. We applied 2- and 3-year lag periods for sensitivity analysis. PPI use was associated with an increased risk of PD when a 1-year lag period was applied between PPI exposure and PD development (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–1.13). A significant positive dose-response relationship existed between the cumulative defined daily doses of PPIs and PD development (P&lt;0.001). Similar results were obtained for the 2- or 3-year lag periods. The association did not vary based on gender. Older age, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, no alcohol consumption, and a non-smoking status were associated with a significantly increased PD risk with PPI use. We observed an association between PPI use and PD risk, although long-term follow-up studies are necessary to verify this association.

Efficacy of a computer based discontinuation strategy to reduce PPI prescriptions: a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial

Deprescribing of inappropriate long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is challenging and there is a lack of useful methods for general practitioners to tackle this. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of the electronic decision aid tool arriba-PPI on reduction of long-term PPI intake. Participants (64.5 ± 12.9 years; 54.4% women) with a PPI intake of at least 6 months were randomized to receive either consultation with arriba-PPI from their general practitioner (n = 1256) or treatment as usual (n = 1131). PPI prescriptions were monitored 6 months before, 6 and 12 months after study initiation. In 49.2% of the consultations with arriba-PPI, the general practitioners and their patients made the decision to reduce or discontinue PPI intake. At 6 months, there was a significant reduction by 22.3% (95% CI 18.55 to 25.98; p < 0.0001) of defined daily doses (DDD) of PPI. A reduction of 3.3% (95% CI − 7.18 to + 0.62) was observed in the control group. At 12 months, the reduction of DDD-PPI remained stable in intervention patients (+ 3.5%, 95% CI − 0.99 to + 8.03), whereas control patients showed a reduction of DDD-PPI (− 10.2%, 95% CI − 6.01 to − 14.33). Consultation with arriba-PPI led to reduced prescription rates of PPI in primary care practices. Arriba-PPI can be a helpful tool for general practitioners to start a conversation with their patients about risks of long-term PPI intake, reduction or deprescribing unnecessary PPI medication.

Role of proton pump inhibitors dosage and duration in Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: Results from the European Registry on H. pylori management.

Management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection requires co-treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the use of antibiotics to achieve successful eradication. To evaluate the role of dosage of PPIs and the duration of therapy in the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication treatments based on the 'European Registry on Helicobacter pylori management' (Hp-EuReg). Hp-EuReg is a multicentre, prospective, non-interventionist, international registry on the routine clinical practice of H. pylori management by European gastroenterologists. All infected adult patients were systematically registered from 2013 to 2022. Overall, 36,579 patients from five countries with more than 1000 patients were analysed. Optimal (≥90%) first-line-modified intention-to-treat effectiveness was achieved with the following treatments: (1) 14-day therapies with clarithromycin-amoxicillin-bismuth and metronidazole-tetracycline-bismuth, both independently of the PPI dose prescribed; (2) All 10-day (except 10-day standard triple therapy) and 14-day therapies with high-dose PPIs; and (3) 10-day quadruple therapies with clarithromycin-amoxicillin-bismuth, metronidazole-tetracycline-bismuth, and clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazole (sequential), all with standard-dose PPIs. In first-line treatment, optimal effectiveness was obtained with high-dose PPIs in all 14-day treatments, in 10- and 14-day bismuth quadruple therapies and in 10-day sequential with standard-dose PPIs. Optimal second-line effectiveness was achieved with (1) metronidazole-tetracycline-bismuth quadruple therapy for 14- and 10days with standard and high-dose PPIs, respectively; and (2) levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy for 14days with high-dose PPIs. None of the 7-day therapies in both treatment lines achieved optimal effectiveness. We recommend, in first-line treatment, the use of high-dose PPIs in 14-day triple therapy and in 10-or 14-day quadruple concomitant therapy in first-line treatment, while standard-dose PPIs would be sufficient in 10-day bismuth quadruple therapies. On the other hand, in second-line treatment, high-dose PPIs would be more beneficial in 14-day triple therapy with levofloxacin and amoxicillin or in 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy either as a three-in-one single capsule or in the traditional scheme.