Dose Of Aspirin Use Research Articles

Aspirin and Risk of Specific Breast Cancer Subtype in Women with Diabetes.

Purpose: Low-dose aspirin was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in women with diabetes. However, whether the protective effect of aspirin varies as a function of the hormone receptor status of breast cancer remained an unanswered question. This study aims to explore the association between aspirin use and the risk of specific breast cancer subtypes in women with diabetes. Methods: Population-based retrospective cohort study of women with diabetes, using the Taiwan National Health Insurance reimbursement database (year 1998 to 2011). Patients diagnosed to have diabetes with new low-dose aspirin use (75-165 mg per day) for at least 28 days of prescription were identified as the study population, while patients without low-dose aspirin use were selected as controls. The main outcome measure was breast cancer by aspirin use and hormone receptor status. Results: We studied a total of 148,739 patients with diabetes. Their mean (standard deviation) age was 63.3 (12.8) years. During follow-up, a total of 849 breast cancers occurred, including 329 hormone receptor-positive and 529 hormone receptor-negative tumors. A total of 27,378 patients were taking aspirin. The reduction in risk with aspirin use was seen among those with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.91) but not for women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.74-1.05). A cumulative dose of aspirin use of more than 8,600 mg was found to reduce the risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer by 31% (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.50-0.97). A cumulative dose of aspirin use of more than 88,900 mg was found to reduce both the risk of hormone receptor-positive and negative breast cancer. Conclusion: These data add to the growing evidence that supports the use of low-dose aspirin as a potential chemopreventive agent for specific subtypes of breast cancer. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Patients receiving knee arthroplasty with pre-existing long-term aspirin use suffer lower risk of perioperative complications but feel more postoperative pain

BackgroundAspirin has gained increasing use-popularity on account of its multiple benefits. The present study aimed to investigate how a pre-existing long-term aspirin use (L-AU) would affect perioperative complications and postoperative pain in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. MethodsUtilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, primary TKAs were divided into L-AU and non-L-AU cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the demographics and comorbidities characteristics. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were calculated for the risk analysis of perioperative complications and postoperative pain. ResultsThe popularity of L-AU in primary TKA patients had significantly increased from 1.5% (2005) to 10.5% (2014) in the U.S. Pre-existing L-AU was associated with decreased risks of most perioperative complications (any complication, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.920), in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.367), and shortened hospitalization stay (LOS) (aOR: 0.647), etc. However, L-AU was recognized as a risk factor of acute postoperative pain (aOR: 1.466) and slightly higher total cost (aOR: 1.047). ConclusionsFor the first time in the present study, it is found that pre-existing long-term aspirin use is benefic in reducing perioperative complication risk. According to this finding, future research might determine the optimal pre-operational taking time and dose of aspirin use. Consequently, orthopedic surgeons and healthcare providers could provide this valuable advice to specific patients prior to a planned arthroplasty and subsequently gain feasible clinical benefits.

Aspirin Use Is Associated with a Reduced Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third‐leading cause of cancer‐related death worldwide, with a growing incidence and poor prognosis. While some recent studies suggest an inverse association between aspirin use and reduced HCC incidence, other data are conflicting. To date, the precise magnitude of risk reduction—and whether there are dose‐dependent and duration‐dependent associations—remains unclear. To provide an updated and comprehensive assessment of the association between aspirin use and incident HCC risk, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of all observational studies published through September 2020. Using random‐effects meta‐analysis, we calculated the pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between aspirin use and incident HCC risk. Where data were available, we evaluated HCC risk according to the defined daily dose of aspirin use. Among 2,389,019 participants, and 20,479 cases of incident HCC, aspirin use was associated with significantly lower HCC risk (adjusted RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51‐0.73; P ≤ 0.001; I2 = 90.4%). In subgroup analyses, the magnitude of benefit associated with aspirin was significantly stronger in studies that adjusted for concurrent statin and/or metformin use (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28‐0.64) versus those that did not (P heterogeneity = 0.02), studies that accounted for cirrhosis (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.45‐0.52) versus those that did not (P heterogeneity = 0.02), and studies that confirmed HCC through imaging/biopsy (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15‐0.58) compared with billing codes (P heterogeneity < 0.001). In four studies, each defined daily dose was associated with significantly lower HCC risk (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97‐0.98), corresponding to an 8.4% risk reduction per year of aspirin use. Conclusion: In this comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis, aspirin use was associated with a significant reduction in HCC risk. These benefits appeared to increase with increasing dose and duration of aspirin use.

The effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence in African Americans.

4085 Background: From 2011 to 2016, the incidence and mortality rate of colorectal cancer(CRC) were highest among African Americans(AA), compared to other US racial/ethnic groups. Long-term aspirin use is recommended as a strategy to reduce the risk of CRC. Yet, there is scant information on the chemopreventive effect of aspirin among AA. It is imperative to assess whether the reported chemo-preventive effect also occurs in AA. Our central hypothesis is that aspirin use in AA is associated with a lower incidence of CRC, irrespective of race/ethnicity. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis, using data from AA participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities(ARIC) longitudinal study, who did not have CRC at enrollment, from 1987 to 1998. We extracted demographic, clinical and mortality data to compare the incidence of CRC among participants taking aspirin compared to those who were not taking aspirin, stratified by age, tobacco use, and body mass index. All-cause mortality and CRC mortality will also be assessed, and we will use Cox proportional hazard regression to determine the relationship between aspirin use and CRC incidence, and mortality. Results: At baseline in 1987, 15,026 participants enrolled in the ARIC study, 25% of whom were AA, median age 54(range 44-66), including 46.7% who reported using aspirin. We analyzed follow-up data from 10,960 participants in 1996-1998, 20% of whom were AA, and 56.9% of whom were taking aspirin. Non-AA participants were more likely to report using aspirin at baseline and follow-up, compared to AA, 53% vs 30% and 59% vs 50% respectively. After 10years, the total incidence of CRC in AA participants was 1% compared with 1.1% in non-AA(p = 0.7). There was no difference in CRC incidence by aspirin use among all participants, and when stratified by race(among all participants p = 0.81, amongAA p = 0.68, among non-AA p = 0.94). Conclusions: We found no difference in the incidence of CRC among AA compared to Caucasians, by aspirin use. Investigation of consistency and/or dose of aspirin use by race may provide further insights on the relationship between aspirin use and CRC incidence, comparing AA to Caucasians.

Aspirin use and the incidence of breast, colon, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers in elderly women in the Iowa Women's Health Study.

Few studies have evaluated the chemopreventive effect of aspirin on the cancer risk in elderly women. We examined associations between frequency, dose, and duration of aspirin use with incidence of 719 aspirin-sensitive cancers (cancers of colon, pancreas, breast, and ovaries) in the Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS), a prospective cohort of women over 70years old. Aspirin frequency, dose, and duration were self-reported in the 2004 IWHS questionnaire. Women were followed-up to 2011. Cancer cases were ascertained by linkage to the Iowa State Health Registry. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among the 14,386 women, 30% were nonusers of aspirin; 34% used low-dose aspirin, and 36% used regular- or high-dose aspirin. Compared with nonuse of aspirin, the HRs (95% CI) for incidence of aspirin-sensitive cancers were 0.87 (0.72-1.06) for regular to high doses of aspirin use, 0.95 (0.80-1.13) for aspirin use 6+ times per week, and 0.93 (0.74-1.17) for aspirin use for 10+ years. For cumulative aspirin use, HR (95% CI) was 0.87 (0.70-1.09) for >60,000mg of aspirin per year and 0.95 (0.75-1.21) for >280,000mg of aspirin in their lifetime, versus nonuse of aspirin. Results were similar for the all-cause cancer death as an endpoint, with a significant inverse association observed between lifetime aspirin dose and cancer mortality [<95,000mg vs nonuser HR 0.76 (0.61-0.95)]. These findings suggest that aspirin use may prevent incident breast, colon, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer in elderly women.

Association between nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug use and brain tumour risk: a meta‐analysis

Several epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and brain tumour risk. However, results from these studies have been inconsistent. The aim of this detailed meta-analysis is to review and summarize the evidence on this association. A comprehensive search for articles published up to September 2013 was performed. Studies evaluating the association between exposure to NSAIDs and risk of brain tumours were included. Random-effects meta-analytical models were used to calculate the relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses, Galbraith plots and subgroup analyses were also performed. Ten studies (six case-control studies, three cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial), published between 2003 and 2013, were included in this analysis. Compared with non-use, overall use of NSAIDs was not statistically significantly associated with brain tumour risk based on the random-effects models (RR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.89, 1.15). No differences were observed when analyses were stratified by gender and brain tumour subtype. Specific analysis for aspirin and non-aspirin NSAIDs yielded similar results. However, a slightly increased risk of brain tumour in NSAID users was observed in cohort studies (RR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.64; P = 0.014). Furthermore, our analysis did not show a significant association between frequency and dose of aspirin use and brain tumour risk. Use of NSAIDs (aspirin and non-aspirin NSAIDs) does not appear to be associated with brain tumour risk, but larger studies are needed to substantiate this relationship.

Celecoxib Plus Aspirin Versus Naproxen and Lansoprazole Plus Aspirin: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Endoscopic Trial

Patients requiring low-dose aspirin along with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are at increased risk for gastrointestinal injury. This study compared the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients treated with low-dose aspirin and a cyclooxygenase-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or a nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug plus the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole. Subjects 18 years or older with osteoarthritis, without gastroduodenal ulcer or erosive esophagitis at baseline endoscopy, and a cardiovascular indication for prophylaxis low-dose (81 or 325 mg) aspirin were prescribed open-label aspirin and blindly randomized to celecoxib 200 mg/day or naproxen 500 mg twice daily plus lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. Endoscopy was performed at 12 weeks or early termination. One thousand forty-five subjects were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication, and 854 (n = 426 celecoxib, n = 428 naproxen plus lansoprazole) subjects with both baseline and final visit endoscopies were evaluable for the primary efficacy analysis. Among these subjects, the rate of endoscopically confirmed gastroduodenal ulcers was not different in the celecoxib (9.9%) and naproxen plus lansoprazole (8.9%; treatment difference [95% confidence interval], 1.0% [-2.9% to 4.9%]) groups. In patients with osteoarthritis taking low-dose aspirin, the use of celecoxib or naproxen plus lansoprazole resulted in similar rates of gastroduodenal ulceration.