Dose-dense Schedule Research Articles

Tailored Dose-Dense Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: End-of-Study Results of the Randomized PANTHER Trial.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Although dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy administered once every 2 weeks leads to superior outcomes compared with standard regimens once every 3 weeks, the observed improvement is largely limited to studies using the suboptimal paclitaxel schedule once every 3 weeks as control. PANTHER is an international phase III trial which compared sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel administered either once every 2 or once every 3 weeks, with tailored dosing at the dose-dense schedule according to hematologic toxicity. In this end-of-study analysis, the median follow-up was 10.3 years. Compared with standard adjuvant chemotherapy, dose-dense treatment improved breast cancer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98]; P = .030), event-free survival (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94]; P = .009), and distant disease-free survival (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98]; P = .030) while the improvement in overall survival was not statistically significant (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04]; P = .109). To our knowledge, this is the first trial that confirms the benefit of a dose-dense regimen over a control regimen containing docetaxel once every 3 weeks.

Controversies on chemotherapy for early HR+/HER2- breast cancer: the role of anthracyclines and dose intensification.

Use of adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduces the risk of recurrence and improves overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, few data are available on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and schedules in patients with hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. We aim to summarize the available evidence on the efficacy of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy and of the dose-dense schedule in this specific patient population. Moreover, current controversies in the management of patients with early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer are discussed. Patient-level meta-analysis evaluating the role of the addition of an anthracycline to taxane-based chemotherapy showed that recurrence rate was lower among patients receiving anthracycline-based treatment.Patient-level meta-analysis evaluating the role of different schedules of chemotherapy administration showed that the use of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy is associated with significant reduction in breast cancer recurrences and breast cancer mortality. Less evidence is available in the neoadjuvant setting. For patients with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer, (neo) adjuvant anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy, and a dose-dense regimen should still be considered the standard of care. However, in patients with intermediate risk breast cancer candidates to chemotherapy, anthracycline-free regimens could be considered the preferred treatment option.

Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low early breast cancer: An exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial.

532 Background: Dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy represents the standard treatment for patients with node-positive early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer, but its role in HER2-low disease is unknown. In this exploratory analysis of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella 2 (GIM2) trial, we investigated efficacy of DD chemotherapy among patients affected by HER2-negative breast cancer according to HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score (low vs. zero). Methods: Patients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either DD or standard schedule anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy. HER2 status was assessed locally. Tumours with HER2 score 0 were classified as HER2-zero, while those with a HER2 score 1+ or 2+ without fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) amplification were defined as HER2-low. Some tumours were classified as HER2-negative with unknown IHC score. Survival outcomes were compared between patients with HER2-zero vs HER2-low tumours. Results: Among 2003 patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 1243 subjects were eligible for this analysis. Median age was 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 44-59) and 604 patients (48.6%) were pre-menopausal. Hormone receptor status was positive in 87.9% of cancers. 475 tumours were classified as HER2-zero (38.2%), 446 (35.9%) were defined HER2-low and 322 (25.9%) were HER2-negative with unknown IHC score. No significant differences were found in terms of baseline characteristics between these three subgroups. At a median follow-up of 14.9 years (IQR 8.4-16.2), no significant interaction was observed between treatment effect and HER2 status in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) (p for interaction=0.46) nor in overall survival (OS) (p for interaction=0.43). Comparing patients with HER2-zero breast cancer with those affected by HER2-low tumours, no significant differences in iDFS were observed (15yr iDFS were 61% vs. 54%, respectively, p=0.25), nor OS differences (15yr OS were 75% vs. 72%, respectively, p=0.19). When investigating DD schedule efficacy among patients with HER2-zero tumours, hazard ratio (HR) for iDFS was 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.87) and HR for OS was 0.57 (95%CI 0.38-0.88). Similarly, within patients affected by HER2-low breast cancer, HR was 0.83 (95%CI 0.62-1.11) for iDFS and 0.83 (95%CI 0.57-1.22) for OS. These results were consistent with the findings of efficacy of DD chemotherapy in the overall population included in this analysis (HR for iDFS 0.73 [95%CI 0.61-0.89]; HR for OS 0.69 [95%CI 0.54-0.88]). Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis of a large phase III adjuvant trial, HER2 status (i.e. HER2-zero vs HER2low) did not show prognostic value. In patients with high-risk early breast cancer, the benefit of DD chemotherapy was observed irrespective of HER2 status. Clinical trial information: NCT00433420 .

Abstract PO1-03-02: Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules in patients with breast cancer: analysis from the randomized phase III GIM2 trial

Abstract Background: The long-term results of the Italian randomized phase III GIM2 study showed that, in women with node-positive breast cancer (BC), dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy significantly improved both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with standard-interval (SI) chemotherapy. Obesity has been identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with BC, with a potential negative impact on the efficacy and toxicity of systemic therapies. Nevertheless, the specific influence of body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules (DD or SI) remains a subject of debate. This analysis aimed to investigate this hypothesis in patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial. Methods: GIM2 was a randomized multicentric phase III trial that compared different chemotherapy schedule (DD vs SI) and regimen (FEC-P vs EC-P) in 2091 node-positive early breast cancer patients. BMI (kg/m2) was categorized as follows: < 18.5 (underweight), 18.5 to < 25 (lean), 25 to < 30 (overweight), and ≥ 30 (obese). The primary endpoint was to assess association between BMI and DFS and OS. Survival estimates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for relevant prognostic factors, were used. Results: A total of 1925 patients were included in the present analysis, of whom 31.6% (n=632) were overweight and 19.3% (n=386) obese. Median age was 52 years. Overweight-obesity condition was significantly associated with postmenopausal status, greater representation of T2-T4 tumors with N > 2 in both patients in the DD and SI arm. After a median follow-up of 15.0 years (IQR 8.4-16.3), compared to patients with normal BMI, those who were overweight or obese at diagnosis had a higher risk of experiencing a DFS event (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.11 95% CI 0.94-1.31 and HR 1.37 95%CI 1.14-1.65, respectively, p=0.003) and OS event (HR 1.11 95% CI 0.89-1.38 and HR 1.59 95%CI 1.26-2.01, respectively, p=0.0003). No significant interaction was found between BMI and treatment schedule in terms of DFS (p for interaction=0.56) nor OS (p for interaction=0.19). At the multivariate analysis, in the DD arm, adjusted HR (aHR) for DFS and for OS were 1.01 (95% CI 0.75- 1.35) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.72-1.52) for obese vs. normal BMI groups, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.68- 1.15) and 0.77 (95%CI 0.54-1.10) for overweight vs. normal BMI groups, respectively. In the SI arm, aHRs for DFS and OS were 1.24 (95% CI 0.94- 1.63) and 1.35 (95%CI 0.96- 1.90) for obese vs. normal BMI groups, and 1.04 (95%CI 0.82- 1.33) and 1.01 (95% CI 0.74-1.40) for overweight vs. normal BMI groups, respectively. Similar results were observed when considering hormone receptor-positive and negative BC separately. Conclusion: In the GIM2 trial, BMI was prognostic but not predictive of different benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. In high-risk patients, DD schedule should be considered the preferred schedule irrespective of BMI. Citation Format: Francesca Poggio, Eva Blondeaux, Marco Tagliamento, Marta Perachino, Simone Nardin, Benedetta Conte, Sabino De Placido, Mario Giuliano, Valeria Forestieri, Michelino De Laurentiis, Adriano Gravina, Giancarlo Bisagni, Anita Rimanti, Anna Turletti, Cecilia Nisticò, Angela Vaccaro, Francesco Cognetti, Alessandra Fabi, Simona Gasparro, Ornella Garrone, Ylenia Urracci, Maria Grazia Alicicco, Mauro Mansutti, Paola Poletti, Pierpaolo Correale, Claudia Bighin, Fabio Puglisi, Filippo Montemurro, Giuseppe Colantuoni, Luca Boni, Matteo Lambertini, Lucia Del Mastro. Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules in patients with breast cancer: analysis from the randomized phase III GIM2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-02.

Randomized trial of fixed dose capecitabine compared to standard dose capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer: The X-7/7 trial.

1007 Background: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), oral capecitabine prescribed at the FDA approved dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily, 14 days on followed by 7 days off, is associated with poor tolerance and high discontinuation rates. Mathematical models suggest a fixed dose, dose dense (7 days on, 7 days off) schedule may be optimal for capecitabine efficacy. We conducted a randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose capecitabine, 1500 mg twice daily, 7 days on, 7 days off (FD) to the FDA approved dose and schedule (SD). Methods: Females with MBC and any prior lines of endocrine therapy or chemotherapy were included. HER-2 positive patients were allowed with concurrent trastuzumab. Patients were stratified by line of chemotherapy (first or subsequent), measurable disease, and ER status, and randomized 1:1 to either FD or SD. The primary endpoint was 3-month progression free survival (PFS). Additional endpoints included PFS and overall survival (OS). Capecitabine related toxicities were solicited and graded at each visit. Results: Between October 2015 and April 2021, 153 patients were enrolled (N=80 FD, N=73 SD) . 78% were hormone receptor positive/HER-2 negative, 11% each were HER-2 positive and triple negative. The 3-month PFS was 76% in the FD arm and 76% in the SD arm (HR=1.01; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.94; p=0.99). Landmark analysis of PFS at 12, 24 and 36 months is reported. Non-proportional hazards were detected, so restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to report estimates of effect. PFS (restricted mean) at 36 months was 13.9 months in the FD arm versus 14.6 months in the SD arm (hazard ratio for progression or death, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.15; p=0.24). OS (restricted mean) at 36 months was 21.2 months in the FD arm versus 19.6 months in the SD arm (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.81; p=0.27). Toxicity related treatment discontinuation occurred in 21 patients (28.8%) in the SD arm compared to 6 patients (7.5%) in the FD arm (p<0.0006). Grade 2-4 toxicities (Table) occurred more frequently in patients receiving SD capecitabine (49.3%) as compared to FD capecitabine (25.0%) (p=0.0018). Conclusions: Fixed dose capecitabine (1500 mg twice daily) on a 7/7 schedule has less toxicity and similar survival when compared to standard BSA-based dosing on a 14/7 schedule in MBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02595320 . [Table: see text]

Prospective Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of a Scalp Cooling Device for the Prevention of Alopecia in Women Undergoing (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

The prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia still represents an urgent need for every day clinical practice. In this regard, this prospective single-center study included breast cancer (BC) patients who underwent a scalp cooling device (Dignicap®) during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this device in preventing alopecia. One hundred and seventy-eight patients (median age 43 years) were enrolled. The chemotherapy regimen included anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (68.1%), docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (25.8%), anthracycline and taxane-based plus carboplatin (3.9%), and paclitaxel alone (2.2%). In 25.3% of cases, a dose dense schedule was used. Overall, the success rate was 68.0%: 100% in paclitaxel alone, 87.0% in docetaxel-cyclophosphamide, 59.5% in anthracycline and taxane, and 71.4% in the sequential regimen plus carboplatin group (anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy versus taxane-based chemotherapy, p ≤ 001. No difference in terms of hair preservation between dose-dense or standard schedule was found (p = 0.557). Early discontinuation of the scalp cooling was observed in 50 patients (28.1%). Although 138 patients (77.5%) experienced adverse events, 70.2% of patients were satisfied with this device. In conclusion, this large prospective study confirmed the helpful effect of the scalp cooling system in preventing alopecia in BC patients also undergoing sequential anthracyclines and taxane-based chemotherapy.

TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1 (TGIF) expression in breast cancer

BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most frequent female cancer and preferentially metastasizes to bone. The transcription factor TGFB-induced factor homeobox 1 (TGIF) is involved in bone metabolism. However, it is not yet known whether TGIF is associated with BC bone metastasis or patient outcome and thus of potential interest.MethodsTGIF expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 1197 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from BC patients treated in the GAIN (German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-Positive) study with two adjuvant dose-dense schedules of chemotherapy with or without bisphosphonate ibandronate. TGIF expression was categorized into negative/low and moderate/strong staining. Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and time to primary bone metastasis as first site of relapse (TTPBM).ResultsWe found associations of higher TGIF protein expression with smaller tumor size (p = 0.015), well differentiated phenotype (p < 0.001) and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC (p < 0.001). Patients with higher TGIF expression levels showed a significantly longer disease-free (DFS: HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.59–0.95], log-rank p = 0.019) and overall survival (OS: HR 0.69 [95%CI 0.50–0.94], log-rank p = 0.019), but no association with TTPBM (HR 0.77 [95%CI 0.51–1.16]; p = 0.213). Univariate analysis in molecular subgroups emphasized that elevated TGIF expression was prognostic for both DFS and OS in ER-positive BC patients (DFS: HR 0.68 [95%CI 0.51–0.91]; log-rank p = 0.009, interaction p = 0.130; OS: HR 0.60 [95%CI 0.41–0.88], log-rank p = 0.008, interaction p = 0.107) and in the HER2-negative subgroup (DFS:HR 0.67 [95%CI 0.50–0.88], log-rank p = 0.004, interaction p = 0.034; OS: HR 0.57 [95%CI 0.40–0.81], log-rank p = 0.002, interaction p = 0.015).ConclusionsOur results suggest that moderate to high TGIF expression is a common feature of breast cancer cells and that this is not associated with bone metastases as first site of relapse. However, a reduced expression is linked to tumor progression, especially in HER2-negative breast cancer.Trial registrationThis clinical trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT00196872.

Postoperative adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy with bevacizumab and maintenance bevacizumab after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: A phase II AGOG/TGOG trial.

5540 Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding bevacizumab to dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab maintenance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. Methods: This phase II clinical trial using Simon's minimax two-stage design was conducted. At the first stage, 13 subjects were enrolled, and the trial would proceed to second stage if ≤3 subjects discontinued treatment for study-defined significant adverse events (AEs). Patients with stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer deemed not feasible for primary cytoreductive surgery were enrolled after 3 to 4 cycles of NAC and IDS without disease progression. NAC could be either weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) (dose-dense) plus 3-weekly carboplatin (AUC5-6) or 3-weekly conventional schedule. After IDS, postoperative dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for 3 cycles at least (best to 6 cycles), and 3-weekly bevacizumab 15mg/kg was given since postoperative cycle 2. Further 3-weekly maintenance bevacizumab 15mg/kg was given intravenously for 17 cycles. Results: Of the 22 enrolled subjects, 13 (59.1%) had no gross lesion after IDS. Of the 13 subjects enrolled on the 1st stage, one study-defined significant AE occurred, therefore the trial proceeded to the 2nd stage (n = 9). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.7 – 30.5), and the median overall survival (OS) was 49.2 months (95% CI, 33.8 – 64.6). Peritoneal Cancer Index score at entering abdomen during IDS was significant for PFS (&gt;12 vs ≤ 12: p = 0.003). One of the 22 subjects did not receive any study treatment. In the safety analysis (n = 21), grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia of 38.1%, neutropenia 71.4%, and anemia 28.6%. Study-defined significant AEs of bowel perforation, poor-healing wound, and hypertension were found in 1 case each, respectively. Conclusions: This phase II trial demonstrated adding bevacizumab to dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab maintenance after NAC was feasible with tolerable toxicity and comparable PFS/OS as compared to other studies using bevacizumab in the NAC phase or dose-dense scheduling throughout. Clinical trial information: NCT02022917.

Anlotinib alone or in combination with temozolomide in recurrent high-grade glioma: A retrospective study.

e14019 Background: High-grade glioma (HGG) is the most common malignant brain tumor and lacks effective treatment regimen. Anlotinib is a multikinase inhibitor blocking angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation simultaneously. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in the treatment of recurrent HGG. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. Eligible patients (pts) were diagnosed with pathologically confirmed high grades (WHO III/IV) glioma and had recurrent or progressive disease on or after prior treatment. Other key eligibility criteria included Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 40, aged 16 ̃75 years and having at least one measurable lesion (RANO criteria). Pts were administrated with anlotinib once daily for 14 days every 3 weeks till disease progression, intolerable toxicities or death. The initial dose was 12mg for younger pts ( &lt; 40 years old) with KPS ≥ 60 and 10 mg for others. Combination treatment was allowed if previous TMZ was effective and tolerable. TMZ was administered on dose-dense schedule (150mg/m2, QD, d1-d7 and d15-d21 every 28 days) or metronomic schedule (25-50mg/m2 QD). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6m) accessed according to RANO criteria. The second endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: Between August 2019 and June 2020, 23 pts with HGG (15 grade IV; 8 grade III; 12 males, 11 females) were enrolled. The median age and median KPS was 42 years and 60. 16 pts have multifocal or disseminated disease. 18 pts received ≥2 lines previous treatment. At the data cutoff date on September 2020, the median duration of treatment was 9 weeks (range: 3-33). The PFS6m was 39.1% and the median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI: 2.8, 5.6). The median OS was not reached (95% CI: NE, NE) and the OS at 12 months (OS12m) was 54.8%. 8 pts observed tumor response and 9 pts had stable disease. The ORR and DCR were 34.8% and 73.9% respectively. The results of survival analysis for subgroups were summarized in table below. Grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 65.2% pts. No ≥ grade 3 TRAE was found. All hematological TRAEs occurred in patients received combination regimen. No TRAE-induced treatment termination occurred. The lower incidence of TRAE may partly attributed to that most pts (18/23) received lower initial dose (10mg) of anlotinib and the relatively shorter treatment duration. Conclusions: This study showed treatment with anlotinib alone or in combination with TMZ had promising efficacy and favorable tolerability in patients with recurrent HGG.[Table: see text]

Postoperative adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy with bevacizumab and maintenance bevacizumab after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: A phase II AGOG/TGOG trial

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding bevacizumab to dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab maintenance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. Study designThis phase II clinical trial using Simon's minimax two-stage design was conducted. At the first stage, 13 subjects were enrolled, and the trial would proceed to second stage if ≤3 subjects discontinued treatment for study-defined significant adverse events (AEs). Patients with stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer deemed not feasible for primary cytoreductive surgery were enrolled after 3–4 cycles of NAC and IDS without disease progression. NAC could be either weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) (dose-dense) plus 3-weekly carboplatin (AUC5−6) or 3-weekly conventional schedule. After IDS, postoperative dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for 3 cycles at least (best to 6 cycles), and 3-weekly bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was given since postoperative cycle 2. Further 3-weekly maintenance bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was given intravenously for 17 cycles. ResultsOf the 22 enrolled subjects, 13 (59.1 %) had no gross lesion after IDS. Of the 13 subjects enrolled on the 1 st stage, one study-defined significant AE occurred, therefore the trial proceeded to the 2nd stage (n = 9). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.1 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 13.7–30.5), and the median overall survival (OS) was 49.2 months (95 % CI, 33.8–64.6). Peritoneal Cancer Index score at entering abdomen during IDS was significant for PFS (>12 vs ≤ 12: p = 0.003). One of the 22 subjects did not receive any study treatment. In the safety analysis (n = 21), grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia of 38.1 %, neutropenia 71.4 %, and anemia 28.6 %. Study-defined significant AEs of bowel perforation, poor-healing wound, and hypertension were found in 1 case each, respectively. ConclusionThis phase II trial demonstrated adding bevacizumab to dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab maintenance after NAC was feasible with tolerable toxicity and comparable PFS/OS as compared to other studies using bevacizumab in the NAC phase or dose-dense scheduling throughout.

Abstract SP023: State of the art treatment for neoadjuvant/adjuvant triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Systemic therapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is currently limited to chemotherapy, with the major questions being the nature and timing of the chemotherapy and optimizing locoregional management of the primary tumor. While TNBC carries the worst prognosis of the clinical subtypes, this prognosis has improved with modern treatment approaches (Cossetti RJ, JCO 2015), and there are subsets within TNBC that have excellent outcomes. Giving the chemotherapy neoadjuvantly has real clinical value. Cytoreduction can facilitate breast conserving surgery (BCS); 42-53% of patients considered ineligible convert to BCS-eligible after chemotherapy (Golshan M et al, Ann Surg 2015 and JAMA Surg 2020). A negative sentinel lymphadenectomy post-chemotherapy is reliable if dual tracer is used and at least three sentinel nodes are retrieved (Boughey J, JAMA 2013), and a high proportion of node-positive breast cancer can be converted to node-negative, allowing omission of axillary dissection and minimizing risk of lymphedema (Pilewskie M, Morrow M, JAMA Oncol 2017). Two ongoing trials in patients with up-front node-positive disease are examining omitting radiation in those converting to node-negative (NSABP B-51, NCT01872975), and axillary radiation instead of dissection in those that remain pathologically node-positive (A011202, NCT01901094). Pathologic complete response (pCR) to chemotherapy across all subtypes of breast cancer carries a markedly better prognosis compared with residual disease. In CALGB 40603, at over 5 years’ followup, 86% of pCR versus 57% of residual disease patients were event-free (Sikov W, SABCS 2019). CREATE-X enrolled approximately 900 patients with HER2-negative tumors and residual disease after chemotherapy, one-third TNBC, who were randomized to the addition of capecitabine versus standard adjuvant treatment. At 3.5 years’ followup, there was a benefit to adding capecitabine, driven by the TNBC subset in whom there was an absolute 14% difference in disease-free and 8.5% difference in overall survival (Masuda, NEJM 2017). For these two reasons (surgical optimization and risk stratification with treatment decisions driven by residual disease status), in TNBC patients appropriate for chemotherapy neoadjuvant timing is preferred. The nature of the regimens has evolved also during the modern era. The key improvements in chemotherapy includes the addition of taxanes to anthracyclines (Hayes DF, NEJM 2007), the use of dose dense schedules made possible through the development of growth factors (Citron M, JCO 2003), and efforts to minimize anthracycline use. The ABC Trials were a joint analysis of several trials examining anthracycline/taxane-based regimens (TAC or dose-dense AC-T) versus a similar duration (six cycles) of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (TC). While underpowered for subset analyses, in the 1300 TNBC patient cohort, anthracycline/taxane regimens outperformed TC, although the absolute benefits were modest in node-negative (2.5%) compared with node-positive (&amp;gt;10%) (Blum J, JCO 2017). For this reason, the preferred regimen in TNBC remains anthracycline/taxane-based. A separate consideration is the incorporation of platinums. Several trials have demonstrated that adding carboplatin significantly increases the pCR rate. However the impact on relapse has been mixed (in underpowered trials); it is reasonable to add in high clinical risk where surgical optimization is desired but is not considered a standard addition to reduce risk of recurrence. Future advances include further surgical and radiation optimization, the potential for using clinical and biomarker analyses to identify low risk TNBC that need no chemotherapy at all, and the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which in two neoadjuvant trials have demonstrated significantly increased pCR. Citation Format: LA Carey. State of the art treatment for neoadjuvant/adjuvant triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr SP023.

Potentially Overestimated Efficacy of Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel compared with Solvent-based Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has exhibited clinical efficacy in breast cancer treatment, but toxicities can be yielded more at the same time. We did this meta-analysis aiming to unambiguously compare nab-PTX with conventional solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-PTX) in breast cancer patients of all stages.Method: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for head-to-head randomized controlled trials of nab-PTX and sb-PTX in breast cancer. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval was used for dichotomous variables while Hazard ratio (HR) was used for time-to-event outcomes.Results: Our review finally included 9 studies with 3508 patients. Nab-PTX showed a benefit on objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.22 [1.04-1.43], P=0.01) as well as non-inferiority compared with sb-PTX in disease control rate (DCR) (RR=1.01 [0.98-1.04], P=0.44), overall survival (OS) (HR=0.99 [0.93-1.05], P=0.81) and disease free survival/progression free survival (DFS/PFS) (HR=0.92 [0.81-1.05], P=0.21). However, when it comes to toxicities (fatigue, nausea or vomiting, peripheral sensory neuropathy and adverse event related discontinuation), results favored sb-PTX (RR=2.89 [1.07-7.8], 3.15 [1.78-5.59], 2.11 [1.32-3.37], 2.02 [1.61-2.53]; P<0.05). Patients with metastatic tumors or undergoing conventional schedule responses better to nab-PTX than the compared groups (RR of ORR in metastatic vs early or locally advanced patients: 1.46 [1.09-1.96] vs 1.01 [0.94-1.08]; conventional vs dose dense group: 1.59 [1.23-2.06] vs 1.01 [0.91-1.12]).Conclusions: Nab-PTX can improve ORR compared with paclitaxel and should be given priority to when aiming to reduce tumor load in breast cancer. Sb-PTX of dose dense schedule is recommended when toxicity of nab-PTX is hard to bear for breast cancer patients.

Effect of dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer patients according to immunohistochemically defined luminal subtype: an exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial

BackgroundLuminal A-like and luminal B-like subtypes have different sensitivity to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, but their role in predicting dose-dense (DD) efficacy in the high-risk setting is unknown. In this exploratory analysis of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella 2 (GIM2) trial, we investigated DD efficacy according to luminal-like subtypes. MethodsPatients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomised to receive either DD or standard-interval (SI) anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by paclitaxel. In our analysis, luminal A-like cohort was identified as having a Ki67 < 20% and a progesterone receptor (PgR) ≥ 20%; luminal B-like cohort as having a Ki67 ≥ 20% and/or a PgR < 20%. ResultsOut of 2003 patients enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 412 had luminal A-like and 638 luminal B-like breast cancer. After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, disease-free survival (DFS) was 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.4–84.5) and 70.5% (66.5–74.2) in luminal A-like and luminal B-like cohorts; overall survival (OS) was 91.6% (88.2–94.1) and 85.1% (81.7–87.9), respectively. We found no significant interaction between treatment and luminal subtype (interaction p = 0.603 and 0.535 for DFS and OS, respectively). When DD efficacy was investigated separately in each cohort, luminal-B like cohort appeared to benefit more from the DD schedule both in terms of DFS (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [95% CI 0.54–0.96]) and OS (unadjusted HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.40–0.94]), compared with the luminal A-like cohort (unadjusted HR for DFS 0.89 [95% CI 0.59–1.33]; unadjusted HR for OS 0.83 [95% CI 0.45–1.54]). ConclusionsNo significant interaction between luminal-like subtype and treatment was observed. Patients in the luminal B-like cohort seemed to benefit more from DD schedule.

Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the Attitudes and Practice of Italian Oncologists Toward Breast Cancer Care and Related Research Activities.

To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the attitudes and practice of Italian oncologists toward breast cancer care and related research activities. A 29-question anonymous online survey was sent by e-mail to members of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology and the Italian Breast Cancer Study Group on April 3, 2020. Only medical oncologists (both those in training and specialists) were invited to complete the questionnaire. Out of 165 responding oncologists, 121 (73.3.%) worked in breast units. In the (neo)adjuvant setting, compared with before the emergency, fewer oncologists adopted weekly paclitaxel (68.5% v 93.9%) and a dose-dense schedule for anthracycline-based chemotherapy (43% v 58.8%) during the COVID-19 outbreak. In the metastatic setting, compared with before the emergency, fewer oncologists adopted first-line weekly paclitaxel for HER2-positive disease (41.8% v 53.9%) or CDK4/6 inhibitors for luminal tumors with less-aggressive characteristics (55.8% v 80.0%) during the COVID-19 outbreak. A significant change was also observed in delaying the timing for monitoring therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors, assessing treatment response with imaging tests, and flushing central venous devices. Clinical research and scientific activities were reduced in 80.3% and 80.1% of respondents previously implicated in these activities, respectively. Medical oncologists face many challenges in providing cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. Although most of the changes in their attitudes and practice were reasonable responses to the current health care emergency without expected major negative impact on patient outcomes, some potentially alarming signals of undertreatment were observed.

Abstract OT2-04-03: Nivolumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- primary breast cancer: CheckMate 7FL

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) primary breast cancer (BC) includes a group of heterogeneous tumors, spanning from biologically indolent, ER signaling-driven to aggressive, endocrine-resistant tumors. Patients (pts) diagnosed with ER+, HER2− BC of high grade and/or low ER expression are at increased risk of relapse, despite current standard of care (SoC): chemotherapy and endocrine treatment (ET) in the neo- and adjuvant settings, respectively. New treatment options to increase cure rates are needed. Increased understanding of ER+, HER2− BC immune biology show an enrichment of cases with tumor cell recognition by the immune system and immune suppression mediated via programmed-death-1 (PD-1) signaling in pts with high-risk disease. Such features, linked with poorer prognosis and potential ET resistance, may be addressed through PD-1 inhibition combined with current SoC for pts with high-risk ER+, HER2− BC. Promising data assessing PD-1 inhibition coupled with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pts with high-risk ER+, HER2− BC noted improved pathologic complete response (pCR) which is identified as a valid surrogate endpoint for long-term clinical outcomes. Trial Design: CheckMate 7FL is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, global phase 3 study evaluating nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant ET in pts with high-risk, ER+, HER2− primary BC. Eligible pts are male or female, aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed grade 2 with ER expression of 1-9%, or grade 3, T1c-2, cN1-2 (tumor size &amp;gt;2 cm) centrally confirmed ER+, HER2− BC. Pts eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, with adequate organ function, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and tissue available for biomarker assessments will be enrolled. Pts with history of ipsilateral invasive BC regardless of treatment, ipsilateral ductal carcinoma in situ treated with radiotherapy, contralateral invasive BC at any time, grade ≥1 peripheral neuropathy, or those with prior treatment for the currently diagnosed BC are excluded. Approximately 1200 pts will be randomized 1:1 to NIVO or PBO, stratified by programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (+ or −), tumor grade (2 or 3), axillary nodal status (+ or −), and anthracycline + cyclophosphamide schedule (Q3W or Q2W). Node negative pts will be capped at 20% of the intent-to-treat population. In the neoadjuvant phase, pts will receive NIVO 360 mg Q3W or PBO plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 QW for four 3-week cycles, followed by NIVO 360 mg Q3W (or 240 mg Q2W) or matching PBO in combination with either doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 Q3W (or Q2W, respectively, dose-dense schedule option) for 4 cycles. Pts will undergo surgery after completion of the neoadjuvant phase. Following surgery, pts will enter the adjuvant phase and receive NIVO 480 mg Q4W or PBO for 7 cycles plus investigator’s choice of ET per local SoC. Primary endpoints are pCR, defined as no histologic evidence of invasive tumor cells in breast and axillary lymph nodes as well as non-axillary sentinel node (ypT0/is, ypN0) as determined by local pathologist, and event-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-free survival, distant-metastasis-free survival, safety, pCR (ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/is) rates, overall response rate, residual cancer burden, and quality of life. pCR rates will be compared using a 2-sided stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with alpha = 0.01. Event-free survival will be compared using a stratified 2-sided log-rank test with adjusted alpha at each interim analysis and at final analysis. Recruitment worldwide is expected to begin in November 2019. For further information, please contact Kristen.Letrent@bms.com. Citation Format: Sherene Loi, Heather McArthur, Nadia Harbeck, Lajos Pusztai, Suzette Delaloge, Kristen Letrent, Tian Chen, Bin Li, Kay Tatsuoka, Dimitrios Zardavas, Giuseppe Curigliano. Nivolumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- primary breast cancer: CheckMate 7FL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-04-03.

A phase 2 open-label study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine as a dose-dense schedule in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer that are resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes

Background: Anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens form the mainstay of chemotherapy treatment in metastatic breast cancer. In patients who develop resistance to these agents, management options are limited and there is no standard of care. Thus, investigation into other chemotherapeutic agents is warranted. Methods: In this non-randomised prospective trial, patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2)-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer that were anthracycline- and taxane-resistant were treated with carboplatin at a dose equivalent to an area under the concentration–time curve of 4.5 mg/ml.min on day 1 and gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 on day 2 of every 2-week cycle. The primary end point was overall response rate. Results: A total of five patients were enrolled prior to early termination due to difficulty in recruitment. The principal reason for recruitment difficulty was mandating anthracycline and taxane pre-treatment and HER-2 negativity. One patient had a complete response, one had a partial response, one had stable disease and two had progressive disease. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in two patients. Conclusions: In this patient population, inclusion criteria that are too stringent may result in difficulties reaching recruitment targets. Carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine appears to be a safe option for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Due to the small sample size, it is not possible to draw firm conclusions regarding efficacy from this trial. Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register ID 2005-005164-83, registered on 10 April 2006.

Pegfilgrastim-induced fatigue and leukocytosis improved following dose reduction in a young patient with breast cancer: A case report.

Dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy is a treatment option for patients with high-risk premenopausal breast cancer. Pegfilgrastim may be administered as prophylaxis against the development of febrile neutropenia and enables the continuation of the DD schedule; however, it is associated with adverse effects, including bone and muscle pain and fatigue. We herein describe our experience with pegfilgrastim administration alongside DD chemotherapy in a patient with breast cancer. A 29-year-old female patient was diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer during lactation. The patient was diagnosed with cT2N1M0, stage IIB triple-negative breast cancer and underwent four cycles of DD chemotherapy with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide, followed by four cycles of docetaxel (DTX) every 2 weeks preoperatively, with 3.6 mg pegfilgrastim administered subcutaneously on day 3 of each cycle. The absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 2,700, 8,400, 11,100, 13,300 and 15,000/mm3 on day 1 of each cycle. The patient experienced fatigue after each pegfilgrastim injection and was considered to be a high responder to pegfilgrastim. Therefore, 1.8 mg pegfilgrastim on day 3 of the first DD-DTX cycle was recommended. On day 1 of the second cycle, the ANC was 13,090/mm3. The patient experienced less fatigue after the administration of 1.8 mg pegfilgrastim, but there was a significant decline in her performance status. As there is currently no evidence of pegfilgrastim dose reduction to below 1.8 mg, pegfilgrastim was omitted on day 3. On day 14, the patient developed viral enteritis, fever (38°C), and an ANC of 297/mm3. Therefore, the third cycle was postponed. After 1 week, the patient's ANC recovered to 2,480/mm3 and she was administered the third cycle with 3.6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 3. Between January 2015 and March 2018, a total of 55 patients with breast cancer received chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim at the Shiga General Hospital. No patients other than the one presented herein experienced leukocytosis during chemotherapy. Although this was a rare complication, a dose of 1.8 mg pegfilgrastim was effective in palliating the patient's symptoms and preventing DD chemotherapy discontinuation.

Prediction of the Optimal Dosing Regimen Using a Mathematical Model of Tumor Uptake for Immunocytokine-Based Cancer Immunotherapy.

Purpose: Optimal dosing is critical for immunocytokine-based cancer immunotherapy to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. Cergutuzumab amunaleukin (CEA-IL2v) is a novel CEA-targeted immunocytokine. We set out to develop a mathematical model to predict intratumoral CEA-IL2v concentrations following various systemic dosing intensities.Experimental Design: Sequential measurements of CEA-IL2v plasma concentrations in 74 patients with solid tumors were applied in a series of differential equations to devise a model that also incorporates the peripheral concentrations of IL2 receptor-positive cell populations (i.e., CD8+, CD4+, NK, and B cells), which affect tumor bioavailability of CEA-IL2v. Imaging data from a subset of 14 patients were subsequently utilized to additionally predict antibody uptake in tumor tissues.Results: We created a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic mathematical model that incorporates the expansion of IL2R-positive target cells at multiple dose levels and different schedules of CEA-IL2v. Model-based prediction of drug levels correlated with the concentration of IL2R-positive cells in the peripheral blood of patients. The pharmacokinetic model was further refined and extended by adding a model of antibody uptake, which is based on drug dose and the biological properties of the tumor. In silico predictions of our model correlated with imaging data and demonstrated that a dose-dense schedule comprising escalating doses and shortened intervals of drug administration can improve intratumoral drug uptake and overcome consumption of CEA-IL2v by the expanding population of IL2R-positive cells.Conclusions: The model presented here allows simulation of individualized treatment plans for optimal dosing and scheduling of immunocytokines for anticancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3325-33. ©2018 AACRSee related commentary by Ruiz-Cerdá et al., p. 3236.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a dose-dense schedule in real life and putative role of PIK3CA mutations.

BackgroundDose-dense chemotherapy is one of the treatments of choice for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer (BC). Activating mutations in PIK3CA gene predict worse response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive patients, while their role is less clearly defined for HER2-negative tumors.MethodsWe conducted a phase I/II study of neoadjuvant, sequential, dose-dense anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy, plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive patients and investigated the correlation of pre-treatment PIK3CA mutation status with pathologic complete response (pCR) and long-term outcome in a real-life setting.Resultswe established a dose-dense docetaxel recommended dose of 60 mg/m2 and 65 mg/m2, with or without trastuzumab, respectively, according to HER2-status, following dose-dense epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (90/600 mg/m2), every 2 weeks. The overall pCR rate was 21.4%; median disease-free survival (DFS) was 52 months and median overall survival (OS) was not yet reached. PIK3CA mutation status was not significantly associated with the pCR rate: 18% for both mutated and wild-type patients. The pCR rate was: 25% in the mutated and 24% in the wild-type (p 0.560) cohort of the HER2-positive subgroup; 33% both in the mutant and wild-type cohort of the triple-negative subgroup; no pCR neither in the mutant nor in the wild-type cohort of the HR-positive/HER2-negative subgroup. Among the HER2-positive population, a trend toward worse DFS was observed in case of mutation, as opposed to the triple negative population.ConclusionsThis study proposes an effective and safe neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline/taxane schedule and suggests that PIK3CA mutation analysis can be usefully performed in real-life clinical practice.

Dose-dense weekly chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The use of dose-dense weekly chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer (OC) remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of dose-dense regimen to improve clinical outcomes in OC patients with the inclusion of new trials. For this updated meta-analysis, PubMed Medline and Scopus databases and meeting proceedings were searched for eligible studies with the limitation of randomized controlled trials, comparing dose-dense chemotherapy versus standard treatment. Trials were grouped in two types of dose-dense chemotherapy: weekly dose-dense (both paclitaxel and carboplatin weekly administration) and semi-weekly dose-dense (weekly paclitaxel and three weekly carboplatin administration). Data were extracted independently and were analyzed using RevMan statistical software version 5.3 (http://www.cochrane.org). Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Four randomized controlled trials comprising 3698 patients were identified as eligible. Dose-dense chemotherapy had not a significant benefit on PFS (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-1.04, p = 0.20). When the analysis was restricted to both weekly and semi-weekly dose-dense data, a no significant interaction between dose-dense and standard regimen was confirmed (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.10 and HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.08, respectively). In the absence of PFS superiority of dose-dense schedule, three weekly schedule should remain the standard of care for advanced OC.