Dose Levels Research Articles

Fraction dose escalation of hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy and subsequent consolidation immunotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 1 study.

This phase 1 trial aimed to determine the maximum tolerated fraction dose (MTFD) of hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) combined with concurrent chemotherapy and subsequent consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors (cICI) for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Split-course hypo-RT and hypo-boost combined with concurrent chemotherapy were administered at three dose levels (DLs), using a stepwise dose-escalation protocol. The sophisticated esophagus-sparing technique was implemented to restrict the dose to the esophagus. Patients who did not experience disease progression or unresolved G2+ toxicities after radiotherapy received cICI. Each DL aimed to treat 6 patients. The MTFD was defined as the highest DL at which <=2 patients of the 6 who were treated experienced treatment-related G3+ toxicity and <=1 patient experienced G4+ toxicity within 12 months post-radiotherapy. Eighteen patients were enrolled with 6 patients in each DL. All patients completed hypo-RT and concurrent chemotherapy, and 16 (88.9%) received at least one infusion of cICI, with a median of 10 infusions. Within the 12-month assessment period, one patient in DL1 experienced G3 pneumonitis, and one patient in DL3 developed G3 tracheobronchitis. The MTFD was not reached. The objective response rate (ORR) was 100%. With a median follow-up of 20.9 months, the 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival rate were 94.4% and 83.3%, respectively. Utilizing the split-course hypo-RT and hypo-boost approach, a fraction dose of 5Gy to a total dose of 60Gy, combined with concurrent chemotherapy and subsequent cICI, was well-tolerated, and yielded promising ORR and survival outcomes.

A phase 1/1b, open-label, dose-escalation study of PD-1 inhibitor, cetrelimab alone and in combination with FGFR inhibitor, erdafitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the leading approaches in tumor immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to establish recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) of intravenous cetrelimab, a checkpoint inhibitor, alone and with oral erdafitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. This open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation phase 1/1b study enrolled adults with advanced solid tumors who were ineligible for standard therapy. Study was conducted in two parts: phase 1a assessed cetrelimab at three dosing levels (80mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], 240mg Q2W, and 480mg Q4W); phase 1b assessed cetrelimab+erdafitinib at two dosing levels (240mg Q2W + 6mg once daily [QD] and 240mg Q2W + 8mg QD). Primary endpoint was frequency and severity of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cetrelimab ± erdafitinib. In total 22 patients (phase 1a, n = 9; phase 1b, n = 13) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 8.64 months in phase 1a and 2.33 months in phase 1b. In phase 1a, DLTs weren't reported while in phase 1b, 1 patient who received 240mg cetrelimab + 6mg erdafitinib reported Stevens-Johnson syndrome (grade 3, immune-related). Overall, 88.9% patients in phase 1a (grade ≥ 3: 44.4%) and 100.0% in phase 1b (grade ≥ 3: 53.8%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs); 33.3% in phase 1a and 38.5% in phase 1b reported serious TEAEs, of which 11.1% patients in phase 1a and 15.4% in phase 1b had TEAEs which led to treatment discontinuation. Cetrelimab alone and in combination with erdafitinib showed manageable safety in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. RP2Ds were determined as 480mg cetrelimab Q4W for monotherapy, and cetrelimab 240mg Q2W + erdafitinib 8mg QD for combination therapy.

Treating Radiation-induced Aceh Rice Germplasm with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi has been Shown to Effectively Address Bacterial Leaf Blight

Background: Bacterial leaf blight can damage upland rice and reduce yield by 30-40%. Chemical pesticides harm ecosystems and can increase pathogen resistance. The objective of this research was to explore the potential of AMF, a biological agent, to enhance the resistance of local Acehnese-radiated mutant rice against bacterial leaf blight. Methods: Two-factor factorial design with three levels of AMF dosage (0 g, 10 g and 20 g per plant) and three upland rice lines (UA-01, UA-09 and UA-10). There were 9 treatment combinations replicated 3 times, resulting in 81 experimental units. Result: The intensity of the disease decreased significantly as the dosage of AMF increased and the maximum number of tillers increased substantially up to 20 g plant-1 AMF application. UA-10 strains exhibited the highest number of tillers per clump, while UA-09 strains had the lowest. The interaction between local Aceh rice varieties and AMF did not impact bacterial leaf blight intensity, maximum number of tillers and percentage of filled grain, except for AMF colonization on roots. The significance of AMF colonization varied among lines, with the highest AMF colonization observed in the UA-10 strain (20.64%) at an AMF dose of 20 g plant-1. AMF inoculation appeared to affect the percentage of filled grain positively.

Comparative efficacy and safety of JAK/TYK2 inhibitors and other oral drugs for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background Janus kinase (JAK)/tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitors are novel treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Objective To perform a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of TYK2 inhibitors with other oral drugs in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods Eligible randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were identified from public databases (published before November 2, 2023). Random-effect frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with ranking based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of Physician's Global Assessment of "clear" or "almost clear" (PGA 0/1), 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75). Results Twenty RCTs containing 7,564 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were included. Deucravacitinib at all dose levels (except for 3 mg every other day) and tofacitinib (10 mg BID) ranked best in achieving PGA 0/1 and PASI-75 at 12- 16 weeks. Tofacitinib (10 mg BID) was considered the most unsafe. Analysis of Ranking according to efficacy and safety showed deucravacitinib (3 mg QD and 3 mg BID) was the best treatment. Analysis of Ranking according to efficacy and safety showed deucravacitinib (3 mg QD and 3 mg BID) was the best treatment. Limitations Insufficiency of eligible data and no long-term follow-up data. Conclusion Deucravacitinib showed superior efficacy and safety for treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis over other included drugs.

The effects of back-projection variants in BPF-like TOF PET reconstruction using CNN filtration - Based on simulated and clinical brain data.

The back-projection strategies such as confidence weighting (CW) and most likely annihilation position (MLAP) have been adopted into back-projection-and-filtering-like (BPF-like) deep reconstruction model and shown great potential on fast and accurate PET reconstruction. Although the two methods degenerate to an identical model at the time resolution of 0ps, they represent two distinct approaches at the realistic time resolutions of current commercial systems. There is a lack of a systematic and fair assessment on these differences. This work aims to analyze the impact of back-projection variants on CNN-based PET image reconstruction to find the most effective back-projection model, and ultimately contribute to accurate PET reconstruction. Different back-projection strategies (CW and MLAP) and different angular view processing methods (view-summed and view-grouped) were considered, leading to the comparison of four back-projection variants integrated with the same CNN filtration model. Meanwhile, we investigated two strategies of physical effect compensation, either introducing pre-corrected data as the input or adding a channel of attenuation map to the CNN model. After training models separately on Monte-Carlo-simulated BrainWeb phantoms with full dose (events=3×107), we tested them on both simulated phantoms and clinical brain scans with two dosage levels. For the performance assessment, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and root mean square error (RMSE) were used to evaluate the pixel-wise error, structural similarity index (SSIM) to evaluate the structural similarity, and contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) in manually selected ROI to compare the region recovery. Compared to two MLAP-based histo-image reconstruction models, two CW-based back-projected image methods produced clearer, sharper, and more detailed images, from both simulated and clinical data. For angular view processing methods, view-grouped histo-image improved image quality, while view-grouped cwbp-image showed no advantage except for contrast recovery. Quantitative analysis on simulated data demonstrated that the view-summed cwbp-image model achieved the best PSNR, RMSE, SSIM, while the 8-view cwbp-image model achieved the best CRC in lesions and the white matter. Additionally, the multi-channel input model including the back-projection image and attenuation map was proved to be the most efficient and simplest method for compensating for physical effects for brain data. Applying Gaussian blur to the histo-image yielded images with limited improvement. All above results hold for both the half-dose and the full-dose cases. For brain imaging, the evaluation based on metrics PSNR, RMSE, SSIM, and CRC indicates that the view-summed CW-based back-projection variant is the most effective input for the BPF-like reconstruction model using CNN filtration, which can involve the attenuation map through an additional channel to effectively compensate for physical effects.

Evaluating Radiation Exposure to Oral Tissues in C-Arm Fluoroscopy A Dose Analysis

This study investigates the radiation dose to oral mucosal tissues during C-arm fluoroscopy imaging using an Alderson Rando phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100) for precise measurements. The aim is to assess the potential risks for patients and healthcare personnel exposed to ionising radiation during these procedures. The Alderson Rando phantom, a human-equivalent model, was utilized to simulate radiation exposure in a controlled environment. TLD-100 dosimeters were strategically positioned in the 6th section of the phantom and exposed to radiation at intervals of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 minutes. The experiments were carried out at Hisar Hospital Intercontinental and the dosimeter readings were then evaluated at Çekmece Nuclear Research Centre. The study demonstrated that the mean radiation doses affecting the internal tissue of the oral mucosa were 0.912 mSv (0.5 minutes), 1.604 mSv (1 minute), 2.719 mSv (2 minutes), 6.763 mSv (4 minutes), and 13.811 mSv (8 minutes). The mean radiation doses affecting the lip skin tissue were 1.423 mSv (0.5 minutes), 2.435 mSv (1 minute), 5.2 mSv (2 minutes), 10.195 mSv (4 minutes), and 17.404 mSv (8 minutes). Results indicate a direct relationship between radiation dose and exposure time, with increasing doses observed at longer exposure times. This research aims to improve patient safety during C-arm scope imaging procedures by determining precise radiation dosage levels for oral mucosal tissues and addressing the lack of published reference values in the literature.

Clinical Pharmacology Strategies for Bispecific Antibody Development: Learnings from FDA-Approved Bispecific Antibodies in Oncology.

Bispecific antibodies, by enabling the targeting of more than one disease-associated antigen or engaging immune effector cells, have both advantages and challenges compared with a combination of two different biological products. As of December 2023, there are 11 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved BsAb products on the market. Among these, 9 have been approved for oncology indications, and 8 of these are CD3 T-cell engagers. Clinical pharmacology strategies, including dose-related strategies, are critical for bispecific antibody development. This analysis reviewed clinical studies of all approved bispecific antibodies in oncology and identified dose-related perspectives to support clinical dose optimization and regulatory approvals, particularly in the context of the Food and Drug Administration's Project Optimus: (1) starting doses and dose ranges in first-in-human studies; (2) dose strategies including step-up doses or full doses for recommended phase 2 doses or dose level(s) used for registrational intent; (3) restarting therapy after dose delay; (4) considerations for the introduction of subcutaneous doses; (5) body weight vs. flat dosing strategy; and (6) management of immunogenicity. The learnings arising from this review are intended to inform successful strategies for future bispecific antibody development.

A phase 1 dose escalation study of a novel coupled CAR T cell therapy, GCC19CART, for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

e15572 Background: GCC19CART is a multitargeted CAR-T cell therapy designed to overcome the limitations of conventional CAR-T cells in solid malignancies by pairing a solid tumor targeting CAR with additional CD19-targeting CARs. This addition is meant to amplify proliferation, activation, and persistence of the CAR-T cells with a goal to overcome the inherent resistance of solid tumors to CAR-T cells. Guanylate cyclase-C (GCC) has been reported to be expressed in over 80% of colorectal cancers with normal expression largely restricted to the luminal side of the GI tract, making it an appealing target for CAR-T cell therapy. A Phase 1 investigator-initiated clinical trial in China reported preliminary results with an ORR of 15.4% (2/13), mOS of 13.3 months in dose level 1 (1x106 CAR-T cells/kg) and 50% (4/8), mOS of 26.1 months in dose level 2 (2x106 CAR-T cells/kg). Common adverse events included cytokine release syndrome (CRS), diarrhea/colitis, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Methods: A phase 1 study in the United States was initiated in August, 2022, for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. As of a data cutoff of December 31, 2023, with a prespecified analysis after the DLT window for the first patient treated at dose level 2, 5 subjects have been reinfused: 4 in dose level 1 and 1 in dose level 2. Subjects were screened for GCC expression. Over 95% of participants screened positive, so this requirement was removed. Eligible subjects underwent leukapheresis, lymphodepleting chemotherapy with a single dose of fludarabine 30mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 300mg/m2, and infusion of GCC19CART. Responses were assessed by RECIST v1.1 by site investigator and an independent third-party imaging review. Results: Five subjects have been treated, 4 in dose level 1 (1x106 cells/kg) and 1 in dose level 2 (2x106 cells/kg), and have completed the 30 day DLT period. The most common CAR-T related adverse events were CRS in 5/5 subjects (grade 1: 2/5 (40%) and grade 2: 3/5 (60%)), diarrhea in 4/5 subjects (grade 1: 1/5 (20%), grade 2: 2/5 (40%), and grade 3: 1/5 (20%)), and ICANS (grade 2: 1/5 (20%)). All adverse events resolved with therapy. The ORR was 40% (2/5) by independent review: 2 subjects demonstrated a partial response however 1 additional subject had partial metabolic response on PET/CT with stable disease. Progressive disease was seen in 2 participants by RECIST 1.1, but 1 has a falling tumor marker suggesting tumor flare. Conclusions: Preliminary results demonstrate that GCC19CART has an acceptable safety profile and meaningful clinical activity in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. This trial is ongoing and updated data will be presented, including from patients treated at dose level 2 (2x106 CAR-T cells/kg). Clinical trial information: NCT05319314 .

Updated safety and antitumor activity of BB-1701 from study 101 in the multiple dose level cohort of patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-low expressing breast cancer.

1110 Background: BB-1701 is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-HER2 antibody and eribulin. After BB-1701 is internalized in HER2 expressing cancer cells, free eribulin is cleaved from the ADC by cathepsin b and causes cytotoxicity to cancer cells. The neighboring cells are affected with bystander effects, like cytotoxicity on tumor cells and non-cytotoxic effects on microenvironment by free eribulin. Here, we report updated results from the ongoing cohort expansion of the first-in-human phase I study (NCT 04257110). Methods: Patients enrolled were ≥18 years of age; had confirmed locally advanced/metastatic HER2 low-expressing (IHC 2+ and FISH negative, or IHC 1+; tested before enrollment) breast cancer; disease progression after ≥2 lines of prior standard therapies; an ECOG PS &lt;2; and measurable lesion(s) (per RECIST v1.1). Four dose levels of BB-1701 (1.0, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.6 mg/kg) were administered during the cohort expansion. Results: As of 31 January 2024, 40 pts with HER2 low-expressing breast cancer were enrolled, 5 at 1.0 mg/kg, 20 at 1.2 mg/kg, 5 at 1.4 mg/kg and 10 at 1.6 mg/kg. Median age was 55 years, 97.5% ps were female, and 30.0%/70.0% pts had ECOG PS 0/1. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 3. The most common (≥20%) all grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were peripheral neuropathy, AST increased, ALT increased, anemia, WBC decreased and hypertriglyceridemia. The most common (≥ 5%) grade 3 TRAEs were peripheral neuropathy and peripheral sensory neuropathy. There were no grade 4 or grade 5 events. Four treatment related serious adverse events were peripheral sensory neuropathy, anemia, spinal compression fracture and infusion related reaction. One patient discontinued BB-1701 treatment due to peripheral neuropathy. Of the 40 pts, 38 were evaluable for efficacy. At 1.0 mg/kg dose level, there were 2 partial response (PR), 2 stable disease (SD), with disease control rate (DCR) of 80.0% and 6-month PFS rate of 20%. At 1.2 mg/kg dose level, there were 5 PR, 11 SD with DCR of 88.9% and 6-month PFS rate of 50%. At 1.4 mg/kg dose level, there were 2 PR, 2 SD with DCR of 80.0% and 6-month PFS rate of 40%. At 1.6 mg/kg dose level, there were 1 complete response (CR), 2 PR with objective response rate of 30.0%, DCR of 60.0% and 6-month PFS rate of 50%. Among the 10 pts at 1.6 mg/kg dose level, 1 pt who had previously been treated with disitamab vedotin maintain CR and has been treated by BB-1701 for 9 months, and 1 pt who had previously been treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan maintain PR and has been treated by BB-1701 for 12 months. Conclusions: BB-1701 shows promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in HER2 low-expressing breast cancer, including patients who received prior anti-HER2 ADCs. Clinical trial information: NCT04257110 .

Safety and efficacy of B7-H3 targeting CAR-T cell therapy for patients with recurrent GBM.

2062 Background: Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is one of the most deadly cancers, and nearly all patients experience recurrence upon the current standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM. The recurrent GBM (rGBM) exhibits a median survival of less than 8 months with limited therapeutic options. We have previously cloned the B7-H3 gene, characterized its function, demonstrated altered B7-H3 expression in human solid tumors, and identified B7-H3 as a promising therapeutic target. We present herein the preliminary findings of an investigator-initiated trial (NCT05241392), where patients with rGBM were treated with autologous chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cells targeting B7-H3 (TX103). Methods: This is an open, single-arm, "3+3" dose-escalation and multiple-dose study. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and the maximal-tolerated dose. Secondary objectives included survival outcomes, tumor responses, immunological responses, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Patients aged 18 to 75 were enrolled with confirmed recurrence by image scan and B7-H3 expression &gt;= 30% by immunohistochemistry analysis. TX103 was administered intracavity and/or intraventricularly to patients via an Ommaya reservoir. TX103 was given biweekly to patients each cycle at dose levels 1, 2, and 3 (20, 60, 150 million cells, respectively), with four cycles as one course. Results: Between March 2022 and January 2024, 13 patients received at least one intracranial infusion of TX103, with 3, 4, and 6 patients in dose levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median number of infusion cycles was 4 (Min, Max 1,9). All patients were included in the safety analysis, revealing no dose-limiting toxicity or CAR-T treatment-related death. All patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE), and the treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) included cytokine release syndrome, increased intracranial pressure (ICP), headache, epilepsy, decreased level of consciousness, vomiting, and pyrexia. Most TRAEs were grade 1-2, while three grade-3 TRAEs were observed: one case of increased ICP in dose level 2, one case of epilepsy, and another case of decreased level of consciousness in dose level 3. As of January 2024, six patients from dose levels 1 and 2 were eligible for a 12-month survival assessment; the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 83.3% (95% CI: 58.3%~100%), and the median OS was 20.3 mo (95% CI: 20.3~not reach). Two of the three patients from dose level 2 achieved partial and complete responses, respectively. Following CAR-T administration, significant increases in cytokines, including IL-6 and IFN-γ, and elevated copy numbers of the CAR gene were observed in the cerebrospinal fluid, while only minimal elevations were noted in the peripheral blood. Conclusions: In this trial, treating rGBM with TX103 is deemed safe and tolerated. These interim results support further study using TX103 to enhance the survival outcomes in patients with rGBM.

Phase 1b study of EZH1/2 inhibitor valemetostat in combination with trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2 low/ultra-low/null metastatic breast cancer.

TPS1120 Background: In the DAISY study (NCT04132960), meaningful clinical response was observed with Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2 IHC 0 MBC. Valemetostat is an oral, selective dual inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog 1 and 2 (EZH1/2) methyltransferases that specifically methylate histone H3 lysine 27. EZH2-mediated PP2A inactivation confers resistance to HER2-targeted therapy. Additionally, valemetostat upregulates Schlafen11 (SLFN11), a putative DNA/RNA helicase, that regulates the sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as topoisomerase I inhibitors. Based on these preclinical studies, this study examines the safety and anti-tumor activity of valemetostat in combination with T-DXd in subjects with HER2 low/ultra-low/null MBC. Methods: This is a single-arm, phase-1b study to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of T-DXd in combination with valemetostat in patients with HER2 low/ultra-low/null MBC (NCT05633979). The dosing for T-DXd is 5.4 mg/kg Q3W administered intravenously as indicated for current clinical use by FDA approval. Valemetostat will be evaluated at three dose levels (100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg orally), with a starting dose (level 1) at 100 mg QD. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period will be the first 2 treatment cycles (42 days). Major eligibility criteria: Pathologically confirmed HER2 low/ultra-low/null breast cancer; ECOG performance status ≤1; Measurable disease; Received at least one line of chemo in the metastatic setting; Progressed and would no longer benefit from endocrine therapy; Normal organ and marrow function. Exclusion criteria: symptomatic brain metastases, interstitial lung disease, cord compression, prior treatment with any anti-HER2 therapy. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended dose for expansion (RDE); To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR); To determine the duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS); To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic markers. Statistical methods: Approximately 12 evaluable patients will be enrolled for the dose-escalation portion based on the Bayesian optimal interval design with a target DLT rate of 25%. Patients will be enrolled in cohorts of 3. The expansion will be performed at the RDE using the 2-stage Bayesian optimal dose-expansion design. In the first stage, 13 evaluable patients will be enrolled. If &lt;5 patients respond in the first stage, the study will be stopped for futility. If ≥5 responses are observed, 13 additional evaluable patients will be enrolled. If 11 or more responses are observed among 26 patients, the treatment will be regarded as promising. This two-stage design yields 78% power under the alternative hypothesis of ORR = 50% (null ORR = 30%) while controlling the one-sided type I error at 10%. Clinical trial information: NCT05633979 .

BC3195, a novel ADC targeting CDH3: Preliminary results of a first-in-human phase I study in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

e15008 Background: Cadherin-3 (CDH3), a calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoprotein, is overexpressed on lung, breast, ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic, head and neck and other malignancies, but with negligible expression on nonmalignant tissues, and associated with cancer aggressiveness, invasiveness, and poor prognosis. BC3195 is known as the only antibody drug conjugate (ADC) in clinical stage, targeting CDH3 with payload of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Methods: A phase I, open-label, first in human study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and preliminary antitumor activity of BC3195 is being performed in subjects with advanced solid malignancies. Disease assessments are performed every 6 weeks using RECIST v1.1. BC3195 is administered as 1 hour (h) IV infusion every 3 weeks. An evaluation of seven dose levels is planned: 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 3.0 and 3.6 mg/kg with a BOIN design guiding dose escalation. Results: Up to January 1st, 2024, nine patients (median age, 59; male, 56%) have been enrolled and treated with BC3195, with 3 patients each in the 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 mg/kg dose cohorts. No DLT was observed across all the 3 dose cohorts. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in ≥3 patients included: aspartate aminotransferase increased (5/9, 55.6%), conjugated bilirubin increased (5/9, 55.6%), triglycerides increased (4/9, 44%), uric acid increased (3/9, 33.3%), heart rate increased (3/9, 33%), and hypoalbuminemia (5/9, 55.6%), cough (4/9, 44.4%), hyponatraemia (4/9, 44.4%), anemia (4/9, 44.4%), asthenia (3/9, 33.3%), rash (3/9, 33.3%), vomiting (3/9, 33.3%) and back pain (3/9, 33.3%). Two subjects experienced ≥ Grade 3 TEAEs unrelated to study drug. Six subjects were evaluable for tumor assessment, and 3 subjects (3/6, 50%) show stable disease (SD) as the best response (2 subjects with target lesion reduction). PK results demonstrated that exposure for the ADC and total antibody (TA) increased with dose, the relationship between AUC0-last and dose was greater than dose-proportional, while Cmax was linear. Free MMAE was highest at the 1.2 mg/kg dose level. Median Tmax values for ADC and TA were 1 h (end of infusion), and median Tmax for free MMAE was 25-169 h. In addition, elimination t1/2 values averaged 27-48 h, 31-68 h and 63-76 h for the ADC, TA, and MMAE, respectively. Conclusions: BC3195 exhibited favorable safety profile and PK characteristics up to 1.2mg/kg. Given BC31095’s safety and PK behavior, as well as preliminary activity at the 0.6 mg/kg dose level, patient enrollment at higher dose levels is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05957471 .

A first-in-human phase 1 trial of T cell membrane-anchored tumor targeted IL12 (ATTIL12) -T cell therapy in advanced/metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcoma.

TPS11586 Background: Interleukin-12 (IL12) is a cytokine that induces antitumor immune response and immune memory by activation of NK cells, induction of IFNg, and maturation of DC cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, prior clinical experience with IL12 has been limited by toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and hepatotoxicity. We developed a novel tumor-targeted IL12 gene (ttIL12) that encodes the p35 and p40 VNTANST fusion subunits that targets cell surface vimentin (CSV). Vimentin is expressed intracellularly in many normal and neoplastic mesenchymal cells but our group discovered that intracellular vimentin is often flipped to the cell surface (referred to as CSV) across multiple tumor types.2 Preclinical studies demonstrated efficacy and induction of long-term memory of ttIL12 against metastatic osteosarcoma with reduced toxicity in immune competent models.3 However, ttIL12 had limited efficacy in treating large volume tumors and did not completely eliminate toxic peripheral cytokines. To address this, our team generated a membrane anchored ttIL12 to arm T cells known as attIL12-T cell therapy. We hypothesize attIL12 will minimize toxic cytokines in peripheral tissues but promote induction of INFg/TNFa in the TME to decrease the toxicity and boost efficacy. Methods: This is a phase 1 trial of attIL12-T cells in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue or bone sarcomas to assess safety, maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Pts in part A (dose finding) will be enrolled using a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design in up to 6 dose levels. Part B (dose expansion) will evaluate preliminary efficacy in 10 additional pts with osteosarcoma treated at the RP2D. Treatment:Pts will undergo leukapheresis to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for generation of attIl12-T cells. Bridging therapy is permitted but not required. Pts will receive cyclophosphamide (Cy) IV prior to planned T cell administration. attIL12 T cells will be administered at the specified dose level IV in a single infusion (dose level 1 and 2) or 2 serial doses (dose level 3-6) on day 0 and day 14. Pts will be monitored for toxicity and response evaluation. Pts will also undergo pre-treatment/on-treatment tumor biopsies for translational and correlative analysis. Eligibility:Pts must be ≥ 12 years of age, have a confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma, evaluable disease, received at least 1 prior line of standard systemic therapy, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate organ function to tolerate immune-effector cell therapy. Pts with known sensitivity to Cy, active/prior autoimmune disease, uncontrolled CNS disease, or other uncontrolled comorbidities that pose potential safety risk will be excluded. Enrollment to cohort 1 began in Dec 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05621668 .

Dose escalation of KY-0118, PD-1, and IL-2v due-target fusion protein in patients with advanced renal clear cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and malignant melanoma.

e14505 Background: KY-0118 is an anti-PD1 and IL-2v(variant) fusion protein for advanced solid tumors. The non-α biased design reduces the binding to IL2-Raβγ and enhanced binding to PD-1 &amp; IL2-Rβγ positive TILs to drive increased proliferation and activation of NK and CD8+ T cells without unwanted expansion of Tregs. KY-0118 adopts specific single design, only 67kDa MW thus obtains excellent tumor penetration activity. The preclinical data shows higher antitumor activity in several CDX models compared with nivolumab and IL2wt. KY-0118 monotherapy is currently in Phase I escalation. Methods: The phase I dose escalation is a traditional 3+3 design, KY-0118 on Days 1, 8 and 15, 21-day treatment cycle, 9 dose levels (0.3μg/kg-64μg/kg) or higher doses of 3 to 6 patients are planned. The dose expansion cohort is currently enrolling. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and determine the DLT, MTD, RP2D of KY 0118 when given alone. Secondary objectives are PK/PD characteristics and preliminary evidence of efficacy via ORR per RECIST v1.1 and iRECIST. Results: Up to Jan 31, 2024, 21 patients have been treated, the median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 2. The dose level 8 (48µg/kg) of DLT observation period is ongoing, no DLT was observed in the administered dose groups. Most of TEAEs are transient grade 1-2, no TEAE led to withdrawal from this study. The most common nonhematologic TRAEs were pyrexia, flu-like symptoms, nausea, fatigue. 2 patients had grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Treatment-related sAEs were observed in one patient (include nausea, vomiting, and pulmonary embolism, now recovered and continuing treatment). No patients experienced complete or partial response, but several showed evidence of antitumor activity, at the dose of 36 ug/kg, 21% shrinkage of target lesions in a patient with RCC, the DCR for the 12, 24, and 36μg/kg dose levels are 33%, 75%, and 67%, respectively. Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that KY-0118 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging early evidence of activity has been observed in locally advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors. Enrollment is ongoing, further results are forthcoming. Pts: 21; AEs: 399; TEAEs: 289 (100%); AESI: 13; sAEs: 8. Clinical trial information: NCT06175780 .

A phase Ia, dose-escalation study of IMB071703 injection in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic, advanced solid tumors.

e14502 Background: IMB071703(XFab-α4-1BB/CD40L), a 4-1BB Fab and triCD40L fusion protein that activates dendritic cell and primes tumor-reactive T cells, mediates immune response, and further inhibits tumor development. We confirmed the expansion of antigen-specific T cells in various mouse models and potent tumor regression administrated by IMB071703 alone or in combination with gemcitabine in vivo, concomitant with improved tumor-reactive T-cell infiltration. IMB071703 showed no signs of liver toxicity at the dose levels up to 51 mg/kg in a repeated-dose study in non-human primates. Here, we describe initial data from a phase Ia study (CTR20230326). Methods: Eligible patients with recurrent or metastatic, advanced solid tumors were enrolled in this study. IMB071703 was administrated at escalating doses of 0.05, 0.15, 0.5,1.0 and 1.5 mg/kg intratumorally Q1W in Cycle 1 (C1:21days), and Q2W from Cycle 2 and subsequent cycles (Cn+1:28 days). Enrolled pts would first undergo DLT observative assessment (21 days). After pts were assessed safely during DLT observation, they would continue the scheduled dosage of IMB071703 until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or other reasons specified in the clinical protocol. The study objectives included the safety, tolerability, PK, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and preliminary efficacy. Results: 7 pts with recurrent or metastatic, advanced solid tumors (median age 60 years, range 42-71; 4 male, 3 female; prior lines of therapy with range 1-6) were treated. Three dose levels, 0.05 mg/kg(n=1), 0.15 mg/kg(n=3), and 0.5mg/kg(n=3), had been evaluated. 1.0mg/kg dose escalation is ongoing. On cutoff date of 18 Dec. 2023, 1 pt is on the study and 6 pts had discontinued treatment. The reasons for discontinuation included confirmed disease progression (n=5) and other reason(n=1). 7 pts (100%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). 5 pts (71%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs≥10%): Injection reaction (pain, fever, chill) (28%), fatigue (11%). All TRAEs were ≤grade 2. No DLT was observed. One death due to disease progression, as only a SAE, was identified to be unrelated. No objective response was observed in 6 evaluable pts. 1 pt was SD and 5 pts were PD. Pharmacodynamic data showed CD40 was occupied ≥50% in the 0.5 mg/kg level. The percentage of CTL (CD3+CD8+) in peripheral blood was increased (0.15mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg) Pharmacokinetic analysis also showed the mean half-life of IMB071703 was 2.45 hours in three dose levels. Biomarker analysis indicated 4-1BB up-regulation and PD-1 down-regulation was associated with the favorable response. Conclusions: IMB071703 Showed a good safety profile at the dose levels of 0.05 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg, and 0.5mg/kg. Both favorable tolerability and preliminary antitumor activity warrant further evaluation in patients with advanced malignancies. Clinical trial information: CTR20230326 .

First-in-human study of ZG0895, a TLR8 selective agonist, as monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.

e15103 Background: ZG0895 is a potent and novel Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonist that shows a highly selective activation of TLR8. It inhibits tumor growth by launching TLR8 downstream signal cascades, thus activating both innate and adaptive immune systems. We report preliminary results from a phase I, first-in-human, dose escalation study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of ZG0895 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Eligible patients previously treated with or intolerant to available standard systemic therapy(ies), received subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of ZG0895 weekly. If tolerated during the first treatment cycle (21 days per cycle), patients would continue weekly s.c. administrations of ZG0895 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, or development of unacceptable toxicity. Dose escalation scheme for ZG0895 was planned with eight dose levels (0.06, 0.18, 0.37, 0.75, 1.50, 2.25, 3.00, 3.75 mg/m2) according to an accelerated titration in the first two dose levels and the standard “3+3” design in the rest dose levels. Primary end points are the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ZG0895. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression free survival (PFS) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, as well as pharmacokinetics. Results: At data cut-off (December 25, 2023), 7 patients (5 males and 2 females), with the median age of 59 (range: 38-74) years old, received weekly s.c. injections of ZG0895 at the dose levels from 0.06 mg/m2 to 0.75 mg/m2 and completed the DLT observation period. Of the 7 patients, 4 (57.1%) received at least 3 lines of prior antineoplastic therapies, and 3 (42.9%) had exposed to PD-(L)1 inhibitors previously. No dose limiting toxicity events were reported. Five patients (71.4%) experienced grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), and the most frequent events were injection site pain, hypertriglyceridaemia and proteinuria. None of patients experienced ≥grade 3 TRAE. Two patients experienced SAEs (intestinal obstruction and tumour haemorrhage), and both events were not related to ZG0895. The Cmax and AUC increased from 0.06 to 0.18 mg/m2 approximately in dose proportion. Conclusions: During the first 4 dose groups, ZG0895 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Phase I dose escalation of ZG0895 are underway in higher doses. Clinical trial information: NCT05877664 .

A multicenter, open-label, phase 1a study of HC-5404 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

e15118 Background: Tumor cells have been shown to adapt to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress resulting from activated oncogenes, nutrient stress, and hypoxia by activating one of the kinases in the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) pathway, Protein kinase RNA-like Endoplasmic Reticulum Kinase (PERK). This adaptation enables them to survive these stresses and develop resistance to standard of care. Targeting PERK in cancer cells could disrupt their ability to thrive under adverse conditions, potentially leading to apoptosis. HC-5404 is a novel, highly selective and potent PERK inhibitor that demonstrates bioavailability and target engagement at efficacious doses across preclinical tumor models. Herein, we report clinical data from the Ph1a study evaluating HC-5404 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: In this first-in-human trial, HC-5404 was administered orally in 21-day cycles to patients ≥18 years old with advanced solid tumors. A Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design was employed to escalate through 7 dose levels (25 mg to 600 mg BID). Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) was assessed during the first cycle. The primary objectives were to establish the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and evaluate the safety and tolerability of HC-5404. The secondary objectives included evaluating PK/PD and antitumor activity (response rate and survival outcomes). Results: 23 patients received HC-5404 across various dose levels. Of these, 47.8% were ≥ 65 years old, 52.2% were male, and 82.6% had received ≥3 prior therapies. Overall, 1 partial response (PR) with a duration of 130 weeks was observed in a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patient who started at the 25 mg dose and was escalated to 50 mg, while 8 patients had stable disease (SD) as best overall response. Three DLTs were observed, including hyperglycemia (300 mg), increased AST, ALP, GGT (200 mg) and decreased ejection fraction (EF) (100 mg). Hyperglycemia was observed only at higher doses (≥300 mg) above clinically relevant exposures of 25-100 mg. The MTD was not established. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 69.6% of patients with common events (≥ 20%) including nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, and dry mouth. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17.4% of patients and included hyperglycemia, acute myocardial infarction, decreased EF, increased troponin, AST, GGT, ALP, and lipase. HC-5404 PK analysis showed rough dose-proportionality across 25-600mg doses and PK/PD analyses demonstrated the human dose range of 25-100 to be functionally equivalent to the pre-clinical efficacious doses. Final analysis of safety and clinical response are ongoing. Conclusions: HC-5404 showed a favorable safety profile and encouraging preliminary efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors. Safety and exposure-response analyses support further exploration of the 25-100 mg dose level of HC-5404, as monotherapy and in novel combinations. Clinical trial information: NCT04834778 .

A phase Ia/b trial of ARX788 combined with toripalimab for HER2-low advanced breast cancer (ABC) and other HER2-expressing solid tumors.

e13159 Background: ARX788 has been proved with superior PFS compared with a combination of capecitabine and lapatinib in the randomized phase Ⅱ/Ⅲ study for HER2-positive ABC (Ambrx, 2023). Here we report the preliminary safety and efficacy of ARX788 plus toripalimab in HER2-low ABC and other HER2-expressing solid tumors. Methods: This was a phase Ⅰ study conducted in China. Eligible patients were HER2-low (IHC2+ and FISH- or IHC1+) ABC or HER2-expressing (IHC 2+ or 3+) solid tumors. Dose exploration with ARX788 is 1.3, 1.5mg/kg, IV, Q3W plus toripalimab 240mg, IV, Q3W. Primary endpoint was safety and RP2D of Ⅰa and efficacy of Ⅰb. Results: Totally, 12 patients were enrolled in phase Ⅰa, 10 patients were diagnosed with ABC, 1 was diagnosed with BTC and 1 was CRC. 6 patients each were treated with 1.3 and 1.5mg/kg. No DLTs were observed. 12 patients (100%) experienced ≥1 ADRs. The most common (≥20%) ADRs were AST increased (75%), platelet count decreased (75%), alopecia (41.67%), white blood cell count decreased (25%), ALT increased (25%), dry eye (25%), interstitial lung disease (25%) and neutrophil count decreased (25%). 1.5mg/kg dose level showed a slightly higher incidence in hematologic toxicities, interstitial lung disease and alopecia. Grade 3 ADRs occurred in 8 patients (66.67%) with equal incidence of the 2 dose levels, those were ocular events (41.7%, 2 of each level), interstitial lung disease (8.3%, 1 of 1.5mg/kg), platelet count decreased (8.3%, 1 of 1.5mg/kg), jaundice (8.3%, 1 of 1.3mg/kg) and immune-mediated myocarditis (8.3%, 1 of 1.3mg/kg). No grade 4 or 5 ADRs occurred. All ADRs were manageable and have recovered. ORR was 41.7% in 12 patients, with 33.3% and 50% in 1.3 and 1.5mg/kg dose level. In 10 patients with ABC, ORR was 50%, with 40% and 60% in each level. DCR was 83.33% and 100%, respectively. Thus, 1.5mg/kg was determined as RP2D and phase Ⅰb is ongoing with HER2-low ABC patients. Conclusions: ARX788 with 1.5mg/kg combined with toripalimab was shown acceptable safety profile with promising efficacy, no significant increase in adverse reactions or serious unexpected immune-related adverse reactions compared with ARX788 monotherapy, which supports further evaluation for HER2-low ABC in a larger sample in Ⅰb trial. Clinical trial information: CTR20222247.

Preliminary results from a first-in-human trial of AMT-116, a topoisomerase I inhibitor containing antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with advanced solid tumors.

e15010 Background: CD44v9 is a tumor-associated antigen highly expressed in various solid tumor types including head and neck, lung, esophageal, pancreatic, colorectal, breast, bladder, hepatic, cervical, and gastric cancers. AMT-116 is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting CD44v9, by conjugating a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, belotecan derivative named KL610023 (Sichuan Kelun-Biotech) to a humanized anti-CD44v9 immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody via a hydrolysable linker with an average drug-to-antibody ratio of 7-8. Methods: This is an ongoing first-in-human, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 1 study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of AMT-116 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, unselected for target expression. Pts received escalating doses of AMT-116 Q2W starting from 1.5 mg/kg guided by the Bayesian logistic regression model (BLRM) following escalation with overdose control (EWOC) principle. Results: As of Feb 1, 2024, eight pts (4 pts at 1.5 mg/kg, 3 pts at 3 mg/kg and 1 pt at 5 mg/kg) have been treated in Australia and pts at 1.5 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg completed the 28-day dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. No DLT events were observed, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not been reached. Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 5 pts out of 8. The most common TRAEs were fatigue (n=3) and nausea (n=3). Only one Grade 3 TRAE (leukopenia) was reported. There were no Grade 4 or 5 TRAEs or treatment-related SAEs. Seven pts have completed at least one post-treatment tumor assessment. At dose level 3 mg/kg, one pt with anal squamous cell carcinoma achieved unconfirmed PR with a 31% tumor shrinkage and one pt with hepatocellular carcinoma achieved SD with a 23% tumor shrinkage from baseline. Subject enrollment in 5 mg/kg is underway. Conclusions: These preliminary data indicate that AMT-116 is well tolerated at the first two dose levels in patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. Dose escalation is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05725291 .

Updated results from first-in-human phase 1 dose-escalation trial of TAK-102, a GPC3-targeted armored CAR T cells, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2543 Background: Glypican 3 (GPC3) is a member of the glypican family of heparan sulfate proteoglycans that are attached to the cell surface by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor. High GPC3 expression rates are reported in numerous cancer types with a high unmet medical need, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TAK-102 is a GPC3-targeted autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy armored with IL-7 and CCL19. The addition of IL-7 and CCL19 to the construct was designed to support the expansion of memory subsets and persistence of CAR-T cells. We hypothesized TAK-102 would help overcome the challenges associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that limit the activity of nonarmored CAR-T therapies in solid tumors. Methods: The first-in-human, Phase 1 dose escalation study evaluated TAK-102 in patients (pts) with GPC3-expressing solid tumors who were refractory or intolerant to standard treatments. TAK-102 was administered via a single infusion to 3 dose cohorts after lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC; consisting of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide): dose level (DL) 1 (starting cohort), 1x107 CAR+ cells/body; DL2, 1x108 CAR+ cells/body; DL3, 5x108 CAR+ cells/body. Objectives included evaluation of safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), recommended phase 2 dose, cellular kinetic (CK) parameters, tumor markers, cytokine/chemokine and antitumor activity based on RECIST 1.1. Results: Eleven pts were enrolled and infused TAK-102 (DL1: 3 pts, DL2: 3 pts, DL3: 5 pts): 1 gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma, 2 liposarcoma, 8 HCC. Five pts achieved stable disease (SD), HCC (GPC3 H-Score: 36) . In patients achieving SD, the greatest reduction in tumor size was 26.4%. No DLTs or neurotoxicity were observed. Six pts experienced cytokine release syndrome (Grade1: 5 pts, Grade2: 1 pt); all cases were manageable. AFP was measured as a tumor marker for HCC. Among 8 pts with HCC, 4 had SD after treatment with TAK-102 and 3 showed a decrease or stabilization of AFP levels corresponding to their clinical status. CK profiles for pts were assessed by flow cytometry and qPCR-based assays. Overall, there was improvement in TAK-102 exposure (Cmax, AUC) when escalating from DL1 to DL2. There was a slight decrease in Tmax from DL2 to DL3. Homeostatic cytokine (IL-7) spiked post-LDC and showed no further increase after TAK-102 infusion across all the DLs. There was dose-dependency observed in peak CCL19, IFN-γ and IL-6 levels. Conclusions: TAK-102, an armored CAR-T, is well tolerated and has a manageable safety profile with some early signs of anti-tumor activity. For CK, TAK-102 exposure (Cmax, AUC) showed improvement from DL1 to DL2, and slight decrease in Tmax from DL2 to DL3. Dose-dependency was observed in peak CCL19, IFN-γ and IL-6 levels, which may point towards increased signal of activity from DL1 to DL3. Clinical trial information: NCT04405778 .