Dorland's Illustrated Medical Research Articles

Contrastive Analysis Between English Medical Terms with Affixes and Their Indonesian Equivalent in Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary

Medical terms are language units used to describe medical conditions such as diseases, symptoms, anatomy, and procedures. Medical terms are composed of a combination of affixes and root words. This research focused on contrastive analysis, a study comparing two languages, the source language and their equivalent in the target language. This study aims (1) to find out similarities between English medical terms with affixes in English and their Indonesian equivalents in Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary (2) to find out differences between English medical terms with affixes in English and their Indonesian equivalents in Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary (3) to predict learning problems based on the differences between English medical terms with affixes in English and their Indonesian equivalents in Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. The data source of this research is "Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary 31st edition" by W.A. Newman Dorland and translated into Indonesian under the title " Kamus Kedokteran Dorland Edisi 3" by Retna Neary Elseria et al. This research is qualitative, and the type of research is library research. The study's results revealed seven affix English medical terms that have similarities with Indonesian equivalents and 93 terms that differ from Indonesian equivalents. The similarities and differences are divided into prefixes and suffixes. There are 8 types of prefixes and 4 types of suffixes. Predictions of problems that may occur in these conditions are in different forms, uses, and meanings. This research is expected to help better understand affixes in English medical terms and their Indonesian equivalents.

Topical Problems of English Medical Terminography and Methods for Solving It (based on Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary)

Topical Problems of English Medical Terminography and Methods for Solving It (based on Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary)

MEDIA REVIEWS

Book reviewed in this article:Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 30th Edition Philadelphia, PA: WB SaundersA Brief History of Disease, Science and Medicine. By Michael Kennedy.The Top100 Drug Interactions:A Guide to Patient Management, 2003 Edition. By Philip D. Hansten and John R. Horn.Atlas of Common Pain Syndromes, By Steven D. Waldman. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders.Prehospital Providers' Guide to Medication. By Alan J Azzara.Atlas of Common Pain Syndromes, By Steven D. Waldman.Prehospital Providers' Guide to Medication. By Alan J Azzara.Clinical Clues: A Collection of EMS Case Studies. By Paul Werfel.The Magic of 3 A.M.:Essaysonthe Artand Science of Emergency Medical Services By James O. Page.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 30th EditionPhiladelphia, PA: WB Saunders (an imprint of Elsevier), 2003, 2,190 pages, $49.95 (hardcover)

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 30th EditionPhiladelphia, PA: WB Saunders (an imprint of Elsevier), 2003, 2,190 pages, $49.95 (hardcover)

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary

Medical and dermatology dictionaries: An examination of unstructured definitions and a proposal for the future

Medical dictionaries serve to describe and clarify the term set used by medical professionals. In this commentary, we analyze a representative set of skin disease definitions from 2 prominent medical dictionaries, Stedman's Medical Dictionary and Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. We find that there is an apparent lack of stylistic standards with regard to content and form. We advocate a new standard form for the definition of medical terminology, a standard to complement the easy-to-read yet unstructured style of the traditional dictionary entry. This new form offers a reproducible structure, paving the way for the development of a computer readable “dictionary” of medical terminology. Such a dictionary offers immediate update capability and a fundamental improvement in the ability to search for relationships between terms.

Book Review: Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary—30th Edition

Book Review: Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary—30th Edition

Etymology of the Word “Stent”

Etymology of the Word “Stent”

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary

Who needs medical dictionaries? Students of medicine and allied professions and crafts need them to find brief, clear definitions of terms encountered in their reading. Medical writers and editors need them to verify spellings, plurals, abbreviations, and kindred linguistic minutiae. Journalists, lawyers, and insurance clerks need them for their own multifarious if not nefarious purposes. Medical transcriptionists need them to find words that dictating physicians have mispronounced or misused, and hence some physicians evidently need them too. For all of the above, the latest Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary has the answers. The definitions in this latest edition perpetuate Dorland's traditionally high standards of succinctness, lucidity, and precision. It is a pleasure to read the work of lexicographers who not only understand what they are writing about but also handle relative clauses and participles with authority, and even know the difference between compose and comprise . A comparison of this edition with

State of infant around birth: do we know what we are talking about?

Journal of Paediatrics and Child HealthVolume 28, Issue 5 p. 362-363 Free Access State of infant around birth: Do we know what we are talking about? R. N. HOWIE, Corresponding Author R. N. HOWIE Department of Paediatrics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand R. N. Howie, FRACP, Associate Professor.Dr R. N. Howie, Department of Paediatrics, National Women's Hospital, Auckland 3, New Zealand.Search for more papers by this author R. N. HOWIE, Corresponding Author R. N. HOWIE Department of Paediatrics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand R. N. Howie, FRACP, Associate Professor.Dr R. N. Howie, Department of Paediatrics, National Women's Hospital, Auckland 3, New Zealand.Search for more papers by this author First published: October 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1992.tb02692.xCitations: 1 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1 Asphyxia. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 27th edn. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia , 1988; 156. 2 Blundell J. Principles and Practice of Obstetricy. London . 1834. (Quoted by Dunn, 8). 3 Little W. J. On the influence of abnormal parturition, difficult labours, premature birth, and asphyxia neonatorum, on the mental and physical condition of the child, especially in relation to deformities. Trans. Obstet. Soc. Lond.. 1861; 3: 314. 4 W. F. Windle Ed. Neurological and psychological deficits of asphyxia neonatorum. Thomas, Springfield , IL . 1958; 84– 5. 5 Asphyxia. The Oxford English Dictionary, Vol. 1, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford . 1989; 695. 6 Sykes G. S., Johnson P., Ashworth F. et al. Do Apgar scores indicate asphyxia Lancet 1982; i: 494– 6. 7 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision., Clinical Modification, Vol. 1. ICD-9-CM, Ann Arbor . 1980; 693. 8 Dunn P. M. Dr James Blundell and neonatal resuscitation. Arch. Dis. Child.. 1989; 64; 494– 5. Citing Literature Volume28, Issue5October 1992Pages 362-363 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary.

Medical Perioperative Management

The purpose ofMedical Perioperative Management, as stated by the editor, is to provide practical, portable guide to perioperative medical assessment and management of the surgical patient. Written by internists and specialists in internal medicine, it is intended to be convenient quick reference for consulting internists... house officers, medical students, surgeons, and anesthesiologists. To this end, basic material is provided for the reader. Information needed by the practicing surgeon regarding perioperative care of medical illnesses of the critically ill surgical patient is not within the scope of this text. Medical Perioperative Managementsets up framework for medical consultant–surgeon interaction. The definition of consultation is a deliberation by two or more physicians with respect to the diagnosis or treatment in any particular case (Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. 25th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1974:354.) While most consultations are helpful, it is the task of the patient's

Automated access to a large medical dictionary: Online assistance for research and application in natural language processing

Online dictionaries can be important tools for research and application in natural language processing. This paper describes work with a machine-readable version of “Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary”. First the characteristics of the dictionary are briefly described, and then the complex process of converting the tape to an online interactive dictionary is discussed. The results of several experiments in automatically deriving information from the online dictionary are presented, and the paper ends with a discussion of the use of the online dictionary as a tool in the development of a natural language processing system designed for the biomedical domain.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary

As little as two or three decades from now, the publication of reference works such as medical dictionaries in book form may virtually cease. The change from printed books to on-line computer services will not only enable editors and compilers to make additions and corrections daily, but free them from the need to exclude valuable material in order to control the sheer bulk of their products. Until that day comes, medical dictionaries will continue to be revised only at intervals of years, and during those intervals the material they contain will grow increasingly stale, and the material they do not contain increasingly conspicuous by its absence. The appearance of a new edition of a major medical dictionary is therefore an event of some moment, raising a number of important questions. Have previous standards of correctness, conciseness, consistency, and comprehensiveness been maintained? Are the very latest terms included, and are the

Webster's Medical Desk Dictionary

The history of medical dictionaries can be traced back to the Etymologiae of Isidore of Seville in the seventh century. The first to be printed was a 1471 edition of a work by an Italian, Simone Cordo, who had lived two centuries earlier. The earliest original compilation of medical terminology in English was A Medicinal Dictionary by Robert James (1743-1745), prefaced, fittingly enough, by Samuel Johnson. Successive editions of three unabridged dictionaries have long been standards for use in the United States, namely, Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, Stedman's Medical Dictionary, and Blakiston's New Gould Medical Dictionary . More recently, in response to needs of allied health professionals and students, among others, some useful reference alternatives have appeared, notably the Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing, and Allied Health and Melloni's Illustrated Medical Dictionary . A new entry into this arena comes from the distinguished house of Merriam-Webster Inc. Webster's Medical Desk Dictionary

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary.

Heterotopic vs Heterotropic

To the Editor: Question 6 of the Self-Assessment Quiz on Spinal Cord Injury (Phys Ther, July 1982) mentions “heterotropic bone formation.” I bring to the attention of the editors of Physical Therapy the correct term—heterotopic. Though it may have been a typographical error, I hope correction will be conveyed to readers, as even in conversation I have heard the wrong term used. According to Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary , heterotopic means “occurring at an abnormal place or upon the wrong part of the body.” “Heterotropic” is not found in Dorland's or, for that matter, in any dictionary I consulted. The closest words are heterotropia—“failure of the visual axes to remain parallel when fusion is a possibility,” and heterotrophic—“not self-sustaining; said of organisms which require a reduced form of carbon for energy and synthesis.”

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. A Dictionary of Virology.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. A Dictionary of Virology.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary

The 25th edition of<i>Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary</i>became available for purchase early in the summer of 1974. Scores of thousands of physicians, medical students, medical secretaries, and other allied personnel will be grateful to the 22 contributors and 84 consultants who labored diligently to maintain the quality of a volume that has served the profession since the turn of the century. During these years, medical science and the art of practice have become more and more compartmentalized. Subspecialization with an expanding army of investigators probing ever more deeply into the mysteries of physiology and disease has generated a parallel expanding vocabulary with which to convey new concepts born of careful observation and research. A specialist in a single field or even a generalist can no longer be familiar with terms arising in the many new areas. The physician who strives to keep abreast of important new developments must read

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary

Samuel Johnson, who certainly should have known, stated: No dictionary of a living tongue ever can be perfect, since while it is hastening to publication, some words are budding and some falling away.... Dictionaries are like watches: the worst is better than none, and the best cannot be expected to go quite true. Since its debut 75 years ago, this lexicon has had 25 editions. I must confess that I have used the 22nd edition for the past 23 years without being aware that I was out of step with the times. Maybe we keep our old dictionaries because we feel comfortable with them, as we do with old friends, and perhaps we have a reluctance to discard them because we do not wish to admit the passing of time. How can a reviewer assess a new dictionary? I am not sure, but I put it to some tests in