Doravirine Research Articles

K103N, V106M and Y188L Significantly Reduce HIV-1 Subtype C Phenotypic Susceptibility to Doravirine.

Doravirine (DOR) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with efficacy against some NNRTI-resistant mutants. Although DOR resistance mutations are established for HIV-1 subtype B, it is less clear for non-B subtypes. This study investigated prevalent NNRTI resistance mutations on DOR susceptibility in HIV-1 subtype C. Prevalent drug resistance mutations were identified from a South African genotypic drug resistance testing database. Mutations, single or in combination, were introduced into replication-defective pseudoviruses and assessed for DOR susceptibility in vitro. The single V106M and Y188L mutations caused high-level resistance while others did not significantly impact DOR susceptibility. We observed an agreement between our in vitro and the Stanford HIVdb predicted susceptibilities. However, the F227L mutation was predicted to cause high-level DOR resistance but was susceptible in vitro. Combinations of mutations containing K103N, V106M or Y188L caused high-level resistance, in agreement with the predictions. These mutations are frequently observed in patients failing efavirenz- or nevirapine-based first-line regimens. However, they are also observed in those failing a protease inhibitor-based second-line regimen, as we have observed in our database. Genotypic drug resistance testing is therefore vital prior to the initiation of DOR-based treatment for those previously exposed to efavirenz or nevirapine.

Comprehensive database of HIV mutations selected during antiretroviral in vitro passage experiments

BackgroundIn vitro passage experiments are crucial to the development of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. MethodsWe created an online database containing data from 102 published studies in which HIV-1 or HIV-2 was cultured with increasing concentrations of the FDA-approved nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs), nonnucleoside RT inhibitors (NNRTIs), integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), capsid inhibitor (CAI) lenacapavir, and nucleoside RT translocation inhibitor (NRTTI) islatravir. We summarized the mutations selected in the subset of passage experiments with NRTIs lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC), abacavir (ABC), tenofovir (TFV), and zidovudine (AZT), NNRTIs doravirine (DOR), efavirenz (EFV), and rilpivirine (RPV), INSTIs bictegravir (BIC), cabotegravir (CAB), and dolutegravir (DTG), and PIs atazanavir (ATV), darunavir (DRV), and lopinavir (LPV). Mutations selected in vitro were compared with those selected in persons receiving the same ARV. ResultsTwenty-seven studies described 89 experiments of wildtype isolates passaged with 3TC, FTC, ABC, TFV, or AZT; sixteen studies described 89 experiments passaged with EFV, RPV, or DOR; eleven studies described 76 experiments passaged with the INSTIs BIC, CAB, or DTG; six studies described 33 experiments passaged with ATV, LPV, or DRV. With several exceptions, mutations selected in two or more experiments were among the most common mutations selected in persons receiving the same ARV. ConclusionsWe created a database of published ARV in vitro selection experiments. Mutations emerging from these experiments generally predict those observed in persons receiving the same ARV. However, there are notable differences in mutation frequencies between in vitro and in vivo settings.

Reversibility of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events after Switching to Darunavir/Cobicistat or Doravirine in Men on INSTI-Based Regimen.

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) are associated with neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). The aim of this study was to evaluate improvements in NPAEs after switching an INSTI-based regimen to darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) or doravirine (DOR). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the reversibility of NPAEs via the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and D) in patients who started antiretroviral therapy with dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC). These patients were switched to DRV/c or DOR. Scales were compared at the moment of the switch and 12 weeks later. Results: We included 1153 treatment-naïve men, 676 (58.7%) with BIC and 477 (41.3%) with DTG. A total of 32 (2.7%) experienced NPAEs that led to discontinuation. Insomnia was found in 20 patients; depression via PHQ-9 in 21 patients, via HADS-D in 5 patients, and anxiety via HADS-A in 12 patients. All of them were evaluated by a psychiatrist at the moment of the symptoms; 7 (21.8%) started psychotropic drugs. After 12 weeks of follow-up, PHQ-9, ISI, HADS-A, and HADS-D decreased, with a p-value ≤ 0.05. Conclusions: NPAEs seem to improve after switching to a DRV/c- or DOR-based regimen after the first 4 and 12 weeks.

Long-term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of doravirine in antiretroviral-experienced people with HIV in real life.

Real-life data on doravirine (DOR) in different drug combinations are limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of DOR plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), mainly abacavir/lamivudine, and dual therapies in people with HIV (PWH), mostly virologically suppressed. Ambispective observational study that enrolled adults PWH who initiated a DOR-based regimen from September 2020 to February 2022 at a referral center in Spain. Participants were grouped as follows: A, received DOR plus two NRTI; B, dual therapy (DT) with DOR plus dolutegravir (DTG) or darunavir/cobicistat (DRVc); C, DOR plus ≥two antiretroviral drugs. The primary endpoints were treatment effectiveness at week 48 by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analysis (OT). A cohort of 187 participants, 91% virologically suppressed, were analyzed after a median follow-up of 112 weeks (80-136). Group A received DOR plus abacavir/lamivudine (ABV/3TC) (n = 109) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TFV/3TC) (n = 45). At week 48, the effectiveness of DOR plus ABV/3TC by ITT was 90.8% (CI95, 88.0-93.6), better than with TFV/FTC [73.3% (66.7-79.9); P = 0.003]. Only one virologic failure was observed. Mild adverse effects were the cause of treatment discontinuation in 7.8%, followed by switching to a single-tablet regimen. In group B, the effectiveness by ITT was 92.9% (CI95, 88.0-97.8) at week 48. No adverse effects or virologic failure were registered in this group. DOR plus two NRTI or DT have long-term effectiveness and safety as a switching option for PWH, mostly virologically suppressed. The DOR plus ABV/3TC combination has shown even better effectiveness than TFV/FTC.IMPORTANCEDOR-based regimens have shown long-term effectiveness and safety in PWH, mostly virologically suppressed. The combination of DOR plus ABV/3TC has shown even better safety and effectiveness than TFV/FTC. DOR plus two NRTI offers cost benefits compared to other regimens.

Discovery of Novel Aryl Triazolone Dihydropyridines (ATDPs) Targeting Highly Conserved Residue W229 as Promising HIV-1 NNRTIs.

NNRTI is an important component of the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), but the rapid emergence of drug resistance and poor pharmacokinetics limited their clinical application. Herein, a series of novel aryl triazolone dihydropyridines (ATDPs) were designed by structure-guided design with the aim of improving drug resistance profiles and pharmacokinetic profiles. Compound 10n (EC50 = 0.009-17.7 μM) exhibited the most active potency, being superior to or comparable to that of doravirine (DOR) against the whole tested viral panel. Molecular docking was performed to clarify the reason for its higher resistance profiles. Moreover, 10n demonstrated excellent pharmacokinetic profile (T1/2 = 5.09 h, F = 108.96%) compared that of DOR (T1/2 = 4.4 h, F = 57%). Additionally, 10n was also verified to have no in vivo acute or subacute toxicity (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg), suggesting that 10n is worth further investigation as a novel oral NNRTIs for HIV-1 therapy.

Durability of doravirine with dolutegravir dual regimen compared with other dolutegravir-based dual combinations.

The availability of doravirine (DOR) allowed clinicians to prescribe a dolutegravir (DTG)-based two-drug regimen (2DR) in individuals not eligible to receive lamivudine (3TC) or rilpivirine (RPV). The aims of this study were to describe the durability of DTG + DOR compared with DTG/3TC and DTG/RPV and the rate of virological failure and target not-detected maintenance over time. This retrospective, monocentric analysis included all subjects who started a DTG-based 2DR from 2018 to 2022 as a simplification. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests to describe and compare the groups were applied. Kaplan-Meier probability curves and Cox regression models for regimens durability were used. The study enrolled 710 individuals: 499 treated with DTG/3TC, 140 with DTG/RPV, and 71 with DTG + DOR. A 2DR with DOR was prescribed to older subjects who had a longer infection, greater exposure to different antiretroviral regimens, a higher proportion of resistance-associated mutations, and a worse immune-virologic status. Over a cumulative follow-up of 68 152 weeks, 42 discontinuations were registered (5.9%). DTG + DOR had a risk of treatment interruption of 7.8% at 48 weeks and 9.8% at 96 weeks, significantly higher than the other 2DRs. In the multivariate Cox model, DTG + DOR and DTG/RPV were significantly associated with discontinuation. The maintenance of target not detected during follow-up was similar among groups. The rate of virological failure was higher for DTG + DOR through different event definitions. DTG + DOR durability was high over a long follow-up albeit lower than for other 2DRs. This combination might be an effective option in people with HIV that has proven difficult to treat.

In Silico Pharmacokinetics Evaluation of Forgiveness for Doravirine and Rilpivirine.

This study aimed to evaluate the concentrations of rilpivirine (RLP) and doravirine (DOR) after 3 days-off using simulations from population pharmacokinetics models. The authors conducted a series of 500 sets of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to examine the steady-state conditions for 2 common dosage levels: 25 mg/d for RLP and 100 mg/d for DOR. These simulations were conducted under 2 scenarios: 1 without drug cessation and another after a 3-day break. The validity of the implementation was established through a comparison of median trough concentrations (C24h) with previously reported data. Subsequently, the proportion of simulated patients with C24h and C72h after 3 days-off (C72h/3do) that exceeded the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50), 5.2 mcg/L for DOR and 20.5 mcg/L for RLP respectively, was calculated. The inhibitory quotient (IQ) was also computed, which was 6 times IC50 for DOR and 4.5 times IC50 for RLP. Finally, nomograms were constructed to estimate the probability of having C72h/3do > IC50 or > IQ for different ranges of C24h. Simulated C24h median ± SD for RLP were 61.8 ± 0.4 mcg/L and for DOR 397 ± 0 mcg/L. For RLP, 99.3 ± 0.1% exceeded IC50 at C24h, 16.4 ± 0.4% at C72h/3do, and none surpassed the IQ threshold. In contrast, DOR had 100% ± 0% above IC50 at C24h, 93.6 ± 0.2% at C72h/3do, and 58.6 ± 0.5% exceeded the IQ. These findings suggest that treatment with DOR may offer a more forgiving therapeutic profile than RLP, given the larger proportion of patients achieving effective drug exposure with DOR. However, it is important to acknowledge a significant limitation of this study, namely, the assumption that drug concentration is a perfect surrogate for drug effectiveness.

1986. Switching to DOR/3TC/TDF Improves Renal Function and Decreases Lipid Levels in People Living With HIV: a Real-Life Multicentric Study

Abstract Background Pivotal studies on Doravirine (DOR) showed its high tolerability and effectiveness, even on resistant strains. Therefore, DOR and its single tablet combination treatment DOR/lamivudine (3TC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has been referred to as a cardiovascular-safe drug. However, data from real-life studies on safety and efficacy of DOR are lacking. Methods Retrospective multicenter cohort study, including 6 Italian HIV centers, evaluated adult treatment-experienced People Living With HIV (PLWH) who switched to DOR/3TC/TDF from June 2020 to June 2022. PLWH with known resistance mutations to DOR were excluded. Clinical and laboratory data were collected at the time of the switch and after 48 weeks. Results A total of 98 PLWH were switched to a DOR/3TC/TDF regimen, 75 (76.5%) male, with a median age of 52.41 years (IQR 42.95-58.79). The main reason for switching to DOR/FTC/TDF regimens was proactive switch (33.3%). No differences were found between the two timepoints on plasma viral load (pVL) (p = 0.345), lymphocytes T CD4+ (CD4+) percentage (p = 0.994) and count (p = 0.611), and CD4+/lymphocytes T CD8+ (CD8+) ratio (p = 0.899), confirming the effectiveness of the drug combination. We also found a significant reduction in total (p < 0.001) and LDL (p = 0.025) cholesterol and triglycerides (p = 0.002). Importantly, we found that the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated with CKD-EPI formula significantly improved despite the presence of TDF (p = 0.028). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 2 PLWHs and were characterized by the onset of a nodular rash in both arms and legs after 2 weeks of therapy in one PLWH, and by the onset of a progressive paresthesia in both extremities of arms after one week of treatment in the other PLWH. In both cases the treatment with DOR/3TC/TDF was interrupted. Conclusion The present real-life study showed that DOR/3TC/TDF significantly reduced lipid levels, surprisingly improving estimated renal function. The virological efficacy of DOR/3TC/TDF along with its immunological, metabolic and safety profile are key elements for a proactive management of the cardiovascular risk. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The DoDo experience: an alternative antiretroviral 2-drug regimen of doravirine and dolutegravir

BackgroundCurrently available antiretroviral 2-drug regimen (2DR) fixed dose combinations may not be suitable for specific situations including the presence of resistance associated mutations (RAM) or drug − drug interactions (DDI). The data on the use of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor doravirine (DOR) and the integrase inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) as an alternative 2DR remain scarce.MethodsPeople living with HIV with DOR + DTG as a 2DR are being followed in a prospective observational study.ResultsThis analysis describes 85 participants with a median age of 57 years. Median CD4-nadir was 173/µl and a majority (66%) had a history of HIV-associated or AIDS-defining conditions. Antiretroviral history was mostly extensive, and documentation of RAM was frequent. The main reasons for choosing DOR + DTG were DDI (29%), tolerability (25%), and cardiovascular risk reduction (21%). Plasma viral load at switch was < 50 copies/ml in all but 3 instances, median CD4 count was 600/µl. DOR + DTG was later changed to another regimen in 10 participants after a median of 265 days, the other 75 participants have remained on DOR + DTG for a median of 947 days.ConclusionDOR + DTG as a 2DR proved to be a durable treatment option even in extensively pretreated individuals.

Lipids and Transaminase in Antiretroviral-Treatment-Experienced People Living with HIV, Switching to a Doravirine-Based vs. a Rilpivirine-Based Regimen: Data from a Real-Life Setting

Doravirine (DOR) is a newly approved non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). We aimed to investigate, in a real-life setting, how switching to a DOR-based regimen rather than a rilpivirine (RPV)-based regimen impacted metabolic and hepatic safety. The analysis included 551 antiretroviral treatment (ART)-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH), starting RPV-based or DOR-based regimens with viral load &lt; 200 copies/mL, baseline (T0), and at least one control visit (6-month visit, T1). We enrolled 295 PLWH in the RPV and 256 in the DOR cohort. At T1, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C), and triglycerides significantly decreased in both DOR and RPV cohorts, while high-density lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) only decreased in RPV-treated people. Consistently, the TC/HDL-C ratio declined more markedly in the DOR (−0.36, p &lt; 0.0001) than in the RPV cohort (−0.08, p = 0.25) (comparison p = 0.39). Similar trends were observed when excluding the PLWH on lipid-lowering treatment from the analysis. People with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels showed a slight ALT increase in both cohorts, and those with baseline ALT &gt; 40 IU/L experienced a significant decline (−14 IU/L, p = 0.008) only in the DOR cohort. Lipid profile improved in both cohorts, and there was a significant reduction in ALT in PLWH with higher-than-normal baseline levels on DOR-based ART.

Comparison of Efavirenz and Doravirine Developmental Toxicity in an Embryo Animal Model.

In the past, one of the most widely used non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) in first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) of HIV infection was efavirenz (EFV), which is already used as a cost-effective treatment in developing countries due to its efficacy, tolerability, and availability. However, EFV also demonstrates several adverse effects, like hepatotoxicity, altered lipid profile, neuropsychological symptoms, and behavioral effects in children after in utero exposure. In 2018, another NNRTI, doravirine (DOR), was approved due to its similar efficacy but better safety profile. Preclinical safety studies demonstrated that DOR is not genotoxic and exhibits no developmental toxicity or effects on fertility in rats. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos have been widely accepted as a vertebrate model for pharmacological and developmental studies. We used zebrafish embryos as an in vivo model to investigate the developmental toxicity of DOR compared to EFV. After exposure of the embryos to the drugs from the gastrula stage up to different developmental stages (30 embryos for each arm, in three independent experiments), we assessed their survival, morphology, hatching rate, apoptosis in the developing head, locomotion behavior, vasculature development, and neutral lipid distribution. Overall, DOR showed a better safety profile than EFV in our model. Therapeutic and supra-therapeutic doses of DOR induced very low mortality [survival rates: 92, 90, 88, 88, and 81% at 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM, respectively, at 24 h post fecundation (hpf), and 88, 85, 88, 89, and 75% at the same doses, respectively, at 48 hpf] and mild morphological alterations compared to EFV exposure also in the sub-therapeutic ranges (survival rates: 80, 77, 69, 63, and 44% at 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM, respectively, at 24 hpf and 72, 70, 63, 52, and 0% at the same doses, respectively, at 48 hpf). Further, DOR only slightly affected the hatching rate at supra-therapeutic doses (97, 98, 96, 87, and 83% at 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM, respectively, at 72 hpf), while EFV already strongly reduced hatching at sub-therapeutic doses (83, 49, 11, 0, and 0% at 1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 μM, respectively, at the same time endpoint). Both DOR at therapeutic doses and most severely EFV at sub-therapeutic doses enhanced apoptosis in the developing head during crucial phases of embryo neurodevelopment and perturbed the locomotor behavior. Furthermore, EFV strongly affected angiogenesis and disturbed neutral lipid homeostasis even at sub-therapeutic doses compared to DOR at therapeutic concentrations. Our findings in zebrafish embryos add further data confirming the higher safety of DOR with respect to EFV regarding embryo development, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and lipid metabolism. Further studies are needed to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the better pharmacological safety profile of DOR, and further human studies are required to confirm these results in the zebrafish animal model.

Changes in Metabolic Profile in PLWHIV Switching to Doravirine-Based Regimen.

Thanks to the modern ARV regimens and the fact that the morbidity and mortality of metabolic syndrome increases with age, clinicians are continuously researching effective and safe antiretroviral regimens with low impact on the lipid profile. Doravirine (DOR) is the latest non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that shows long-term safety and tolerability and a favorable lipid profile. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of DOR-based three-drug regimens on the lipid profile in clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 38 treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH) switching to this regimen, following the eligibility criteria. We carried out comparison analysis of immunological and metabolic parameters between baseline and 48 weeks of follow up. In our cohort of treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed PLWH, three-drug regimens with DOR showed good efficacy and a positive profile on lipid metabolism at 48 weeks of follow up.

Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide plus doravirine in highly treatment-experienced men with multidrug-resistant HIV.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching highly treatment-experienced people with HIV (HTE PWH) from rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (RPV/FTC/TAF) plus dolutegravir (DTG) to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) plus doravirine (DOR). A pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted to assess the potential interaction between BIC and DOR. This open-label switch trial enrolled HTE PWH from a primary care private practice in the United States. Eligible participants were male, aged ≥45 years, with documented viral resistance to protease inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and/or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors but no resistance to RPV or DOR, and no K65R or T69 insertion mutations. Virologic suppression (≤50 copies/ml) while on RPV/FTC/TAF plus DTG for ≥6 months was required prior to enrollment. The primary endpoint of the study was virologic suppression (<50 and <200 copies/ml) at 48 weeks. Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, changes in body mass index (BMI), and identification of PK parameters of BIC and DOR. Twenty males [median age: 65 years (range, 46-74), median time since HIV diagnosis: 37 years (range, 12-42)] completed the study. BIC/FTC/TAF plus DOR was well tolerated with no serious or treatment-related adverse events reported and no appreciable changes in BMI from baseline to Week 48. At Week 48, 100% of participants had <50 viral copies/ml. PK parameters for BIC and DOR ( n = 10) were consistent with published data. Switching from RPV/FTC/TAF plus DTG to BIC/FTC/TAF plus DOR was well tolerated and efficacious in HTE men aged ≥45 years with HIV.

Evaluation of plasma doravirine concentrations in patients with HIV-1 undergoing hemodialysis

The pharmacokinetics of doravirine (DOR) have not been clarified in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of DOR in four HIV-1-infected patients undergoing HD who were administered DOR. The participants were patients undergoing HD for end-stage renal disease and were administered DOR. DOR was administered once daily (one tablet of 100 mg), every evening. On days of HD treatment, DOR was administered after the end of the procedure. After administration of DOR for at least 1 week, the plasma DOR concentration was measured. The median plasma trough DOR concentration was 766.9 ng/mL (range: 509–1085 ng/mL). The median DOR clearance by HD, DOR elimination rate, half-life (T1/2) of plasma DOR concentration during HD, and T1/2 during the non-HD period were 85.04 mL/min, 73.12%, 7.71 h, and 13.76 h, respectively. The T1/2 during the HD period was significantly shorter than the T1/2 during the non-HD period (p = 0.0030). In this study, elimination of DOR by HD was confirmed. Viral suppression was maintained in all patients undergoing HD, and none had adverse events or safety problems. As DOR is eliminated by HD, monitoring its plasma concentration is considered necessary for clinical use.

Virologic status and pattern of drug resistance mutation among ART-experienced HIV-infected patients in Butuo County, China

To assess the virological outcomes, prevalence of HIV drug resistance mutation (DRM), and correlates in Butuo County. We conducted a cross-sectional study. Virological failure (VF) was defined as HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL and on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for ≥6 months. Genotypic drug resistance was performed among VF cases. Correlates of DRM were identified using multivariate logistic regression. The overall virological suppression rate was 85.3%; DRM was detected in 42.6% (517/1215) VF cases and 6.2% of the sample patients. A total of 90.9% of patients were infected with HIV-1 CRF07_BC subtype. The prevalence of DRM to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) were 46.0% and 96.9%, respectively. The most prevalent mutation for NRTI was M184V (84.5%). Lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC), and abacavir (ABC) had the highest resistance rates. For NNRTI, K103N (60.7%), nevirapine (NVP), and efavirenz (EFV) had the highest resistance rates and cross resistance to rilpivirine (RPV), doravirine (DOR), and etravirine (ETR). Ritonavir boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) resistance rate was extremely low. The occurrence of DRM was associated with age at ART ≤18 years, baseline CD4 count ≤200 cells/mL, NVP-based regimen, and ART duration >3 years. A relatively high proportion of VF and broad DRM for NRTI and NNRTI were observed, causing high-level resistance to first-line NRTI, NNRTI, and next generation NNRTI. Our findings necessitate the implementation of scaling up virological monitoring, adherence support, and timely switching to an LPV/r-containing regimen when patients with VF to reduce the occurrence of DRM.

Doravirine and Rilpivirine Intra Cellular Accumulation in the Clinical Setting

Background: Doravirine (DOR) and Rilpivirine (RPV) are the NNRTIs currently most used in the clinical setting, in dual and triple drug regimens (2DR and 3DR). Intracellular (IC) Pharmacokinetics (PK) of these drugs has not been fully elucidated. Our aim was to compare plasma PK and IC accumulation in real-life experienced patients (pts). Methods: Pts on DOR- and RPV-including Antiretroviral (ARV) regimen were considered. DOR and RPV plasma and IC (PBMCs) concentrations were measured at 12 (37%) (T12) and 24 ± 4 hours (63%) (T24) after last drug intake by means of UHPLC-MSMS validated methods. Results: 90 pts (65% on 3DR and 35% on 2DR) were included: 52% on DOR- and 48% on RPV-containing ARV. RPV IC/plasma ratio was significantly higher than DOR IC/plasma ratio: 6.034 (4.878-7.186) vs. 1.479 (1.256-1.702) (p=0.001) independently from timing T12 (p=0.003) and T24 (p&lt;0.001). RPV in 3DR resulted to have higher plasma and IC accumulation compared to 2DR. Linear and significative correlations between DOR and RPV plasma and IC concentrations were found (+0.749, p&lt;0.001 and +0.733, p&lt;0.001). No significative correlation between overall DOR and RPV PK and creatinine, BMI or age or difference by gender was found. Conclusion: RPV proved to accumulate in PBMCs at a higher degree as compared to DOR: RPV and DOR IC levels were 498% and 50% higher than in plasma. RPV showed an IC PBMC/plasma ratio 3-fold higher than DOR. Potential explanation could rely on the higher lipophilicity of RPV. Clinical significance of these data needs to be investigated in further studies.

Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a Cohort of Virologically Suppressed People Living with HIV Switching to Doravirine: Preliminary Data from the Real Life.

Aim of this study is to assess the impact of doravirine (DOR)-based regimens on cardiovascular risk in treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWHIV). We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 40 treatment-experienced PLWHIV switching to a DOR-based three-drug regimen, evaluating 10-year risk of manifesting clinical cardiovascular diseases (CD) through the Framingham Risk Score at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks of follow-up. At baseline, median predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (10Y-CD) was 8.0% (interquartile range 4.0-13.0). After 12 weeks, we observed a significant reduction in 10Y-CD (mean decrease -2.21, p = .012); similarly, we observed a nonsignificant reduction at week 24 (p = .336). Regarding metabolic parameters, after 24 weeks we observed a significant reduction in total cholesterol (median change -8.8 mg/dL, p = .018), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (median -9.5 mg/dL, p = .007), and triglycerides (median -19.8 mg/dL, p < .001). Our results show a favorable metabolic impact of DOR-based regimens along with a promising reduction in 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Doravirine-Based Regimens in Real Life: A Prospective Monocentric French Study.

Doravirine (DOR) efficacy and safety have been evaluated in adult naive or treated patients starting a DOR-based regimen between September 15, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Medical history and examination, laboratory results, and tolerance were assessed during the 48 weeks of follow-up. Among the 77 patients included, virological control (VC) was noticed for 66 patients at baseline. Median age was 51 years, and 62% were men. The most common reason for initiating a DOR-based therapy was toxicity (44; 67%) and, especially, weight gain. A virological suppression (VS) was maintained in 55 (83%) patients of the VC group and noticed in 9 (82%) of the non-VC patients at week 48, by intention-to-treat analysis. On treatment analysis, 98% and 100% patients achieved VS in the VC and non-VC groups, respectively. The renal and metabolic tolerance were good. DOR-based regimens appear to be a safe and relevant strategy to circumvent drug interactions and drugs with a poor metabolic tolerance profile.

Validation of an LC-MS/MS assay for the simultaneous determination of bictegravir, doravirine, and raltegravir in human plasma

Bictegravir (BIC), an integrase inhibitor, and doravirine (DOR), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, were recently approved by the US FDA for HIV treatment and are recommended first line treatment options. Because certain clinical scenarios warrant using them in combination, we developed a fully validated LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous measurement of BIC and DOR, along with a legacy integrase inhibitor, raltegravir (RAL), in human plasma over a clinically relevant 1000-fold range for each analyte. These analytes were extracted from the plasma by protein precipitation with their stable, isotopically labeled internal standards (BIC-d5, 13C6-DOR, and RAL-d6). Following extraction, samples were analyzed by reverse phase chromatography on a Waters Atlantis T3 C18 (50 ×2.1 mm, 3 µm particle size) column with subsequent detection by electrospray ionization in positive ion mode on an AB Sciex API-5000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The assay was linear (R2 >0.994) over the selected calibration ranges (20.0–20,000 ng/mL (BIC), 3.00–3000 ng/mL (DOR), and 10.0–10,000 (RAL)). The assay was accurate (inter-assay %Bias ≤ ± 8.5) and precise (inter-assay %CV ≤11.4). This method was validated according to FDA guidance for industry and can be used to assess the pharmacokinetics of two newly approved antiretrovirals, or to support therapeutic drug monitoring for modern antiretroviral therapy.

Doravirine-associated resistance mutations in antiretroviral therapy naïve and experienced adults with HIV-1 subtype C infection in Botswana

There are limited data on the prevalence of doravirine (DOR)-associated drug resistance mutations in people with HIV (PWH) in Botswana. This cross-sectional, retrospective study aimed to explore the prevalence of DOR-associated resistance mutations among ART-naïve and -experienced PWH in Botswana enrolled in the population-based Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP). A total of 6078 HIV-1C pol sequences were analysed for DOR-associated resistance mutations using the Stanford HIV drug resistance database, and their levels were predicted according to the Stanford DRM penalty scores and resistance interpretation. Virologic failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA load (VL) >400 copies/mL. Among 6078 PWH, 5999 (99%) had known ART status, and 4529/5999 (79%) were on ART at time of sampling. The suppression rate among ART-experienced was 4517/4729 (96%). The overall prevalence of any DOR-associated resistance mutations was 181/1473 (12.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 10.7-14.1]); by ART status: 42/212 (19.8% [95% CI: 14.7-25.4]) among ART-failing individuals (VL ≥400 copies/mL) and 139/1261 (11.0% [95% CI: 9.3-12.9]) among ART-naïve individuals (P < 0.01). Intermediate DOR-associated resistance mutations were observed in 106/1261 (7.8% [95% CI: 6.9-10.1]) in ART-naïve individuals and 29/212 (13.7% [95% CI: 9.4-8.5]) among ART-experienced participants (P < 0.01). High-level DOR-associated resistance mutations were observed in 33/1261 (2.6% [95% CI: 1.8-3.7]) among ART-naïve and 13/212 (6.1% [95% CI: 3.6-10.8]) among ART-failing PWH (P < 0.01). PWH failing ART with at least one EFV/NVP-associated resistance mutation had high prevalence 13/67 (19.4%) of high-level DOR-associated resistance mutations. DOR-associated mutations were rare (11.0%) among ART-naive PWH but present in 62.7% of Botswana individuals who failed NNRTI-based ART with at least one EFV/NVP-associated resistance mutation. Testing for HIV drug resistance should underpin the use of DOR in PWH who have taken first-generation NNRTIs.