Legal and Criminological PsychologyVolume 18, Issue 2 p. 382-382 Clarification statementFree Access Perpetrator programmes for partner violence: A clarification This article corrects the following: Perpetrator programmes for partner violence: A rejoinder to Respect John Archer, Louise Dixon, Nicola Graham-Kevan, Volume 17Issue 2Legal and Criminological Psychology pages: 225-232 First Published online: July 23, 2012 First published: 29 August 2013 https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12026AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Following publication of Archer, Dixon, and Graham-Kevan (2012), a representative from Respect raised with the editorial office some concerns about the portrayal of Respect's activities by Archer et al. Having considered the analysis and data presented by each party, the Editor of Legal and Criminological Psychology concluded that there was no misrepresentation of available information within Archer et al. and that the article remains fit for publication. However, it was agreed useful to publish the following statements to clarify today's practices at Respect. Respect does not, and has never, independently run a helpline for female victims. The helpline promoted on Respect's website is administrated by Women's Aid and Refuge. Respect responds to male and female perpetrators. For example, their recent analysis of calls to the Respect Helpline showed that a minority of callers were female perpetrators. Respect view an assessment of gender as vital to responding effectively to domestic violence, and one that should be understood to explain other factors of domestic violence. However, they do not view it as the only factor to be considered. Respect's website now contains details of multi-site research work, including the Mirabel project described in Debbonaire and Todd (2012). The journal welcomes the opportunity to have made these clarifications, whilst maintaining the integrity of the originally published works. It thanks the authors, Respect, and the Editor for their detailed comments and analysis. References Archer, J., Dixon, L., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2012). Perpetrator programmes for partner violence: A rejoinder to Respect. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 225– 232. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02061.x Debbonaire, T., & Todd, J. (2012). Respect response to Dixon et al. (2012) ‘Perpetrator programmes for partner violence: Are they based on ideology or evidence?’. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 216– 224. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02051.x Volume18, Issue2September 2013Pages 382-382 ReferencesRelatedInformation