Domain Of E1A Research Articles

Analysis of E1A domains involved in the enhancement of CDK2 activity

E1A is an adenoviral protein which is expressed at the early phase after viral infection and contains four conserved regions (CR1, CR2, CR3 and CR4). Our previous work suggests that E1A facilitates the formation of cyclin A-CDK2 complex and thereby enhances CDK2 activity. However, the molecular function of E1A in CDK2 activation has been unclear. Here, we studied the mechanism of enhancement of CDK2 activity by E1A, using the E1A variant forms which selectively contain CR domains. We isolated four E1A variant forms, i.e. 13S (containing CR1, CR2, CR3, CR4), 12S (CR1, CR2, CR4), 10S (CR2, CR4) and 9S (CR4), derived from HEK293 cells which express E1A. 13S promoted G2/M-phase arrest, upon CDK2 hyper-activation by co-expressing a stabilized cyclin A mutant, most strongly among those E1A variant forms. Concomitantly, the specific activity of the 13S-associated CDK2 was highest among them. 10S exhibited lower affinity for CDK2 than the 13S while the affinity for CDK2 was comparable between 13S and 12S. Nonetheless, 12S did not enhance the CDK2 specific activity. On the other hand, a mutation in CR2 domain, which is essential for binding to p107, suppressed both the binding and activation of CDK2. These results suggest that CR1 domain, in addition to CR2 domain via p107 interaction, is important for binding to CycA-CDK2 complex while CR3 domain facilitates CDK2 activation. Since the function of CR3 in cell cycle regulation has been relatively unknown, we propose the enhancement of CDK2 activity as a novel function of CR3 domain.

Abstract B07: Characterization of T-cell therapy enhancing oncolytic adenoviruses with human cytokine expression

Abstract Adenovirus vectors are the most commonly used gene therapy vectors in clinical trials. Administrated systemically or intratumorally the virus is capable of inducing immune responses against the tumor per se, but this effect can also be amplified by arming the viruses with immune system stimulating factors. Moreover, we have discovered that adenoviruses enhance adoptive T-cell therapy in a potent manner. Our previous data also shows that the most promising factors to stimulate immune system are interleukin (IL) -2 and Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNFα). IL-2 is a commonly used cytokine in treating malignant melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. However, systemic IL-2 can in some cases lead to severe side effects. Like IL-2, TNFα activates immune cells, but it is also known for its anti-tumor properties and it is for example capable of promoting tumor cell death by apoptosis and necrosis. Arming oncolytic viruses with cytokines results in long lasting, high level expression locally but low level systemically. Currently, we are developing oncolytic adenoviruses with expression of one or both of the above mentioned human cytokines. The viruses have an Ad5/3 chimera that is generated through replacement of the Ad5 fiber knob with the Ad3 knob while the Ad5 shaft and tail are retained. The chimera has proven to have an improved cancer cell transduction as well as antitumor efficacy. In addition, the viral genome has an E2F promoter and a 24-basepair deletion at the E1A domain, which makes it selective to retinoblastoma protein defective cells (most tumor cells). The viral particles are produced in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell line. The genomes are sequenced and the functionality of the viruses and the cytokines proven with various methods. The secretion of cytokines is tested with ELISA and by using indicator cell lines. The functionality of the viruses is studied by infecting different cells lines with variable amount of viral particles and measuring the proportion of surviving cells with MTS-assay. Our data proves oncolytic and cytokine production capability of Ad5/3-E2F-D24-hTNFα/hIL2 adenoviruses. The results indicate that these viruses can be used in further investigations in vivo. Citation Format: Riikka Havunen, Suvi Parviainen, Mikko Siurala, Akseli Hemminki. Characterization of T-cell therapy enhancing oncolytic adenoviruses with human cytokine expression. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy: A New Chapter; December 1-4, 2014; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2015;3(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B07.

Novel mechanism of JNK pathway activation by adenoviral E1A.

The adenoviral oncoprotein E1A influences cellular regulation by interacting with a number of cellular proteins. In collaboration with complementary oncogenes, E1A fully transforms primary cells. As part of this action, E1A inhibits transcription of c-Jun:Fos target genes while promoting that of c-Jun:ATF2-dependent genes including jun. Both c-Jun and ATF2 are hyperphosphorylated in response to E1A. In the current study, E1A was fused with the ligand binding domain of the estrogen receptor (E1A-ER) to monitor the immediate effect of E1A activation. With this approach we now show that E1A activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), the upstream kinases MKK4 and MKK7, as well as the small GTPase Rac1. Activation of the JNK pathway requires the N-terminal domain of E1A, and, importantly, is independent of transcription. In addition, it requires the presence of ERM proteins. Downregulation of signaling components upstream of JNK inhibits E1A-dependent JNK/c-Jun activation. Taking these findings together, we show that E1A activates the JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway upstream of Rac1 in a transcription-independent manner, demonstrating a novel mechanism of E1A action.

Modification of the Rb-Binding Domain of Replication-Competent Adenoviral Vector Enhances Cytotoxicity Against Human Esophageal Cancers via NF-κB Activity

A replication-competent adenoviral vector deficient for expression of the early E1B55K protein has been applied in clinical studies. The vector, however, was not fully effective for the treatment of human cancer. In this study, the E1A gene (which encodes an Rb-binding domain protein) of the adenoviral vector AxE1AdB was further engineered with a point mutation designed to abolish binding to Rb protein (pRb) and arrest the cell cycle (AxdAdB-3). The difference in the cytotoxicity of these vectors in two cancer cell lines was observed in association with differences in replication, infection efficiency, and expression levels of adenovirus receptors. Relative to the parent vector (AxE1AdB), which worked in a manner similar to ONYX-015, AxdAdB-3 with the mutated pRb-binding motif demonstrated increased cytotoxicity against p53-mutant human esophageal cancer cell lines EC-GI-10 and T.Tn. AxdAdB-3 showed a greater oncolytic effect than AxE1AdB in vivo despite almost the same replication efficiency in vitro. Unexpectedly, cell cycle arrest in AxdAdB-3-infected cells was less efficient than that in cell lines infected with AxE1AdB. However, AxdAdB-3 strongly reduced NF-kappaB activity and thereby enhanced apoptosis more than AxE1AdB did. These data demonstrate that the Rb-binding domain of E1A can regulate NF-kappaB activity and that modifications to this domain may lead to advances in gene therapies for the treatment of human cancers.

Coordinate Inhibition of Cytokine-mediated Induction of Ferritin H, Manganese Superoxide Dismutase, and Interleukin-6 by the Adenovirus E1A Oncogene

Adenovirus E1A sensitizes cells to the cytotoxic action of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). This effect has been attributed to direct blockade of NF-kappaB activation, as well as to increased activation of components of the apoptotic pathway and decreases in inhibitors of apoptosis. In this report we evaluated the mechanism by which E1A modulates the expression of the cytokine-inducible cytoprotective genes manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and ferritin heavy chain (FH). We observed that E1A blocks induction of MnSOD, IL-6, and FH by TNF-alpha or IL-1alpha. Because NF-kappaB plays a role in cytokine-dependent induction of MnSOD, IL-6, and FH, we assessed the effect of E1A on NF-kappaB in cells treated with TNF. IkappaB, the inhibitor of NF-kappaB, was degraded similarly in the presence and absence of E1A. TNF induced a quantitatively and temporally equivalent activation of NF-kappaB in control and E1A-transfected cells. However, TNF-dependent acetylation of NF-kappaB was diminished in cells expressing E1A. E1A mutants unable to bind p400 or the Rb family proteins were still capable of repressing TNF-dependent induction of FH. However, mutants of E1A that abrogated binding of p300/CBP blocked the ability of E1A to repress TNF-dependent induction of FH. These results suggest that p300/CBP is a critical control point in NF-kappaB-dependent transcriptional regulation of cytoprotective genes by cytokines.

Adenoviral E1A Targets Mdm4 to Stabilize Tumor Suppressor p53

The adenoviral protein E1A associates with multiple anticancer activities, including stabilization of p53 tumor suppressor, and has been tested through gene therapy approaches in clinical trials. To identify potential E1A-binding proteins involved in E1A's anticancer activities, we screened a yeast two-hybrid library and identified Mdm4, an Mdm2-related p53-binding protein, as a novel E1A-binding protein. The NH(2)-terminal region of Mdm4 and the CR1 domain of E1A were required for the interaction between E1A and Mdm4. E1A preferentially bound to Mdm4 rather than Mdm2 and formed a complex with p53 in the presence of Mdm4, resulting in the stabilization of p53 in a p14(ARF)-independent manner. E1A failed to stabilize p53 in the absence of Mdm4, showing that Mdm4 was required for p53 stabilization by E1A. Moreover, E1A-mediated stabilization of p53 occurred in nucleus. Although it had no effect on the p53-Mdm2 interaction, E1A facilitated Mdm4 binding to p53 and inhibited Mdm2 binding to Mdm4, resulting in decreased nuclear exportation of p53. Thus, our findings highlighted a novel mechanism, whereby E1A stabilized the p53 tumor suppressor through Mdm4.

A new role of protein phosphatase 2a in adenoviral E1A protein-mediated sensitization to anticancer drug-induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells.

The adenoviral type 5 E1A protein has been shown to induce sensitization to different categories of anticancer drug-induced apoptosis, partly by down-regulation of the activity of a critical oncogenic kinase Akt in both normal fibroblasts and epithelial breast cancer cells. Currently, the adenoviral E1A gene is being tested as an antitumor gene in multiple clinical trials. However, molecular mechanisms underlying E1A-mediated chemosensitization and down-regulation of Akt activity are still not completely defined. Here, we show that E1A by up-regulation of the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A [PP2A (PP2A/C)] enhanced the activity of PP2A, which results in repression of Akt activation in E1A-expressing cells. In addition, activation of PP2A/C is required for E1A-mediated sensitization to drug-induced apoptosis, because blocking PP2A/C expression using a specific small interfering RNA against PP2A/C reduced drug sensitivity in E1A-expressing cells. Deletion mutation of the conserved domain of E1A, which is required for E1A-mediated sensitization to drug-induced apoptosis, also abolished the ability of E1A to up-regulate PP2A/C. Thus, the up-regulation of PP2A may represent a novel mechanism for E1A-mediated sensitization to anticancer drug-induced apoptosis.

Expression of an E1A/E7 chimeric protein sensitizes tumor cells to killing by activated macrophages but not NK cells.

Adenovirus (Ad) E1A and human papillomavirus (HPV) E7 express homologous conserved regions (CRs) that mediate their shared biological functions. Despite their similarities, the expression of E1A sensitizes tumor cells to killing by NK cells and macrophages but the expression of E7 does not, a factor that may contribute to the dissimilar oncogenicities of Ad and HPV. This study was undertaken to define molecular differences between E1A and E7 that are responsible for the ability of E1A and the inability of E7 to sensitize cells to killing by NK cells and macrophages. Genetic mapping studies using human fibrosarcoma cells (H4) that stably expressed mutant forms of E1A showed that only those forms of E1A that interacted with the transcriptional coadaptor protein p300 sensitized cells to killing by NK cells and macrophages. E7 lacks the N-terminal p300-binding region present in E1A. Therefore, a chimeric E1A/E7 gene was constructed that included the N terminus and the CR1 (p300-binding) domain of E1A fused to CR2 and the C-terminal sequences of E7. The E1A/E7 protein interacted with p300 and pRb and immortalized primary mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF). The expression of E1A/E7 sensitized H4 and MEF cells to killing by activated macrophages but not to killing by NK cells. Therefore, N-terminal differences between E1A and E7 that map to the E1A-p300 binding region accounted for differences in their abilities to sensitize cells to killing by macrophages. However, regions in addition to the E1A-p300 binding region are required to sensitize cells to killing by NK cells.

Strategic attack on host cell gene expression during adenovirus infection.

To understand the interaction between the virus and its host, we used three sources of cDNA microarrays to examine the expression of 12,309 unique genes at 6 h postinfection of HeLa cells with high multiplicities of adenovirus type 2. Seventy-six genes with significantly changed expression ratios were identified, suggesting that adenovirus only modulates expression of a limited set of cellular genes. Quantitative real-time PCR analyses on selected genes were performed to confirm the microarray results. Significantly, a pronounced transcriptional activation by the promiscuous E1A-289R transcriptional activator was not apparent. Instead, promoter sequences in 45% of the upregulated genes harbored a potential E2F binding site, suggesting that the ability of the amino-terminal domain of E1A to regulate E2F-dependent transcription may be a major pathway for regulation of cellular gene expression. CDC25A was the only upregulated gene directly involved in cell cycle control. In contrast, several genes implicated in cell growth arrest were repressed. The transforming growth factor beta superfamily was specifically affected in the expression of both the upstream ligand and an intracellular regulator. In agreement with previous reports, adenovirus also targeted the innate immune response by downregulating several cytokines, including CLL2, CXCL1, and interleukin-6. Finally, stress response genes encoding GADD45B, ATF3, and TP53AP1 were upregulated. Importantly, we also found a novel countermeasure-activation of the apoptosis inhibitor survivin.

Activation domain-mediator interactions promote transcription preinitiation complex assembly on promoter DNA.

The interaction of activators with mediator has been proposed to stimulate the assembly of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) preinitiation complexes, but there have been few tests of this model. The finding that the major adenovirus E1A and mitogen-activated protein kinase-phosphorylated Elk1 activation domains bind to Sur2 uniquely among the metazoan mediator subunits and the development of transcriptionally active nuclear extracts from WT and sur2-/- embryonic stem cells, reported here, allowed a direct test of the model. We found that whereas VP16, E1A, and phosphorylated Elk1 activation domains each stimulate binding of mediator, Pol II, and general transcription factors to promoter DNA in extracts from WT cells, only VP16 stimulated their binding in extracts from sur2-/- cells. This stimulation of mediator, Pol II, and general transcription factor binding to promoter DNA correlated with transcriptional activation by these activators in WT and mutant extracts. Because the mutant mediator was active in reactions with the VP16 activation domain, the lack of activity in response to the E1A and Elk1 activation domains was not due to loss of a generalized mediator function, but rather the inability of the mutant mediator to be bound by E1A and Elk1. These results directly demonstrate that the interaction of activation domains with mediator stimulates preinitiation complex assembly on promoter DNA.

Adenovirus E1A requires the yeast SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex and associates with SAGA components Gcn5 and Tra1

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used as a model system to study the function of the adenovirus E1A oncoprotein. Previously we demonstrated that expression of the N-terminal 82 amino acids of E1A in yeast causes pronounced growth inhibition and specifically interferes with SWI/SNF-dependent transcriptional activation. Further genetic analysis identified the yeast transcription factor Adr1 as a high copy suppressor of E1A function. Transcriptional activation by Adr1 requires interaction with co-activator proteins Ada2 and Gcn5, components of histone acetyltransferase complexes including ADA and SAGA. Analysis of mutant alleles revealed that several components of the SAGA complex, including proteins from the Ada, Spt, and Taf classes were required for E1A-induced growth inhibition. Growth inhibition also depended on the Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase, and point mutations within the Gcn5 HAT domain rendered cells E1A-resistant. Also required was SAGA component Tra1, a homologue of the mammalian TRRAP protein which is required for c-myc and E1A induced cellular transformation. Additionally, Gcn5 protein could associate with E1A in vitro in a manner that depended on the N-terminal domain of E1A, and Tra1 protein was co-immunoprecipitated with E1A in vivo. These results indicate a strong requirement for intact SAGA complex for E1A to function in yeast, and suggest a role for SAGA-like complexes in mammalian cell transformation.

Recruitment of TRRAP required for oncogenic transformation by E1A

TRRAP links Myc with histone acetylases and appears to be an important mediator of its oncogenic function. Here we show that interaction with TRRAP is required for cellular transformation not only by Myc, but also by the adenovirus E1A protein. Substitution of the 262 N-terminal residues of Myc with a small domain of E1A (residues 12-54) restores Myc transforming function. E1A(12-54) contains a TRRAP-interaction domain, that recruits TRRAP to either E1A-Myc chimeras, or the native 12S E1A protein. Overexpression of a competing TRRAP fragment in vivo blocks interaction of cellular TRRAP with either E1A-Myc or E1A, and suppresses cellular transformation by both oncoproteins. Moreover, E1A(Delta26-35) that fails to bind TRRAP but is capable of binding the Retinoblastoma (Rb)-family and p300/CBP proteins is defective in cellular immortalization, transformation and cell cycle deregulation. Thus in addition to disrupting Rb and p300/CBP functions, E1A must recruit TRRAP to transform cells.

Human papillomavirus E6E7-mediated adenovirus cell killing: selectivity of mutant adenovirus replication in organotypic cultures of human keratinocytes.

Replication-competent adenoviruses are being investigated as potential anticancer agents. Exclusive virus replication in cancer cells has been proposed as a safety trait to be considered in the design of oncolytic adenoviruses. From this perspective, we have investigated several adenovirus mutants for their potential to conditionally replicate and promote the killing of cells expressing human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 and E7 oncoproteins, which are present in a high percentage of anogenital cancers. For this purpose, we have employed an organotypic model of human stratified squamous epithelium derived from primary keratinocytes that have been engineered to express HPV-18 oncoproteins stably. We show that, whereas wild-type adenovirus promotes a widespread cytopathic effect in all infected cells, E1A- and E1A/E1B-deleted adenoviruses cause no deleterious effect regardless of the coexpression of HPV18 E6E7. An adenovirus deleted in the CR2 domain of E1A, necessary for binding to the pRB family of pocket proteins, shows no selectivity of replication as it efficiently kills all normal and E6E7-expressing keratinocytes. Finally, an adenovirus mutant deleted in the CR1 and CR2 domains of E1A exhibits preferential replication and cell killing in HPV E6E7-expressing cultures. We conclude that the organotypic keratinocyte culture represents a distinct model to evaluate adenovirus selectivity and that, based on this model, further modifications of the adenovirus genome are required to restrict adenovirus replication to tumor cells.

Functional Knockout of the Corepressor CtBP by the Second Exon of Adenovirus E1A Relieves Repression of Transcription

The C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) acts as a transcriptional corepressor upon recruitment to transcriptional regulators. In contrast, interaction between CtBP and the adenovirus E1A protein is required for efficient activation of E1A-responsive genes, suggesting that E1A might block CtBP-mediated repression. Recruitment of CtBP to a promoter, either as a Gal4CtBP fusion or through an interaction with a Gal4 fusion protein expressing the CtBP interacting domain (CID) of E1A, resulted in transcriptional repression. The second exon of E1A, containing the CID, alleviated repression by Gal4E1ACID-recruited CtBP, but not Gal4CtBP-mediated repression, suggesting that E1A prevented repression by blocking promoter recruitment of CtBP. E1ACID was also sufficient to derepress transcription from several cotransfected promoter constructs. Furthermore, inducible expression of E1ACID in established cell lines resulted in significant changes of endogenous gene expression, possibly by sequestration of CtBP. Together, these data indicated that CtBP might act as a wide-range regulator of transcription. Although CtBP was shown to interact with histone deacetylases (HDACs), transcriptional repression by a Gal4CtBP fusion protein was not sensitive to inhibition of HDACs by trichostatin A (TSA). In contrast, TSA eliminated E1ACID derepression of E1A second exon-responsive promoters. Although the reason for this difference remains to be experimentally verified, it is possible that the requirement for HDACs might differ depending on the mechanism by which CtBP becomes promoter recruited.

CAMP-independent Activation of the Adenovirus Type 12 E2 Promoter Correlates with the Recruitment of CREB-1/ATF-1, E1A12S, and CBP to the E2-CRE

Expression of the transcription unit early region 2 (E2) is of crucial importance for adenoviruses because this region encodes proteins essential for viral replication. Here, we demonstrate that the E1A(12S) protein of the oncogenic adenovirus serotype 12 activates the E2 promoter in dependence of the N terminus and the conserved region 1. Activation is mediated through a cAMP-response element that is bound by CREB-1 and ATF-1. Moreover, the Ad12 E2 promoter is inducible by protein kinase A and repressed by either a dominant-negative cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB) mutant or the highly specific protein kinase A inhibitor protein underscoring the participation of CREB-1/ATF-1 in promoter activation. E1A(12S) binds to CREB-1 and ATF-1 in dependence of the N terminus and CR1 and is recruited to the E2 cAMP-response element through both cellular transcription factors. Most interestingly, point mutations revealed that E1A(12S) domains essential for binding to CREB-1/ATF-1 and for activation of the Ad12 E2 promoter are also essential for binding to the CREB-binding protein. Due to these data and results obtained in DNA-dependent protein-protein interaction assays, we propose a model in which the cAMP-independent activation of the Ad12 E2 promoter is mediated through a ternary complex consisting of CREB-1/ATF-1, E1A(12S), and CREB-binding protein, which assembles on the E2 cAMP-response element.

The adenovirus E1A domains required for induction of DNA rereplication in G2/M arrested cells coincide with those required for apoptosis.

Induction of apoptosis by adenovirus E1A in rodent cells is stimulated by wild type (wt) p53 but completely suppressed by mutated p53. The suppression is overcome by coexpression with Id proteins (Ids). The cells expressing E1A and Ids undergo apoptosis after accumulation in S phase, suggesting that S phase events are perturbed by E1A and Ids. The E1A domains required for induction of apoptosis, analysed by transfection with expression vectors for E1A, Ids and their mutants, followed by flow cytometry, reside in N-terminal (positions 17 - 38), CR1 and CR2 regions. Interaction of E1A with Ids requires the N-terminal and CR1 regions. The cyclin D1 promoter activity in S phase was reduced severely by E1A and this reduction is caused through CR1 and CR2 regions required for interaction with pRB. Analysis of DNA synthesis in G2/M arrested cells indicated that E1A is capable of inducing >4 N cells and this E1A-mediated DNA rereplication is enhanced by coexpression with Id-1H. The E1A domains required for induction of DNA rereplication coincide with those required for apoptosis.

E1A Sensitizes Cells to Tumor Necrosis Factor-induced Apoptosis through Inhibition of IκB Kinases and Nuclear Factor κB Activities

The adenovirus E1A protein has been implicated in increasing cellular susceptibility to apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor (TNF); however, its mechanism of action is still unknown. Since activation of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) has been shown to play an anti-apoptotic role in TNF-induced apoptosis, we examined apoptotic susceptibility and NF-kappaB activation induced by TNF in the E1A transfectants and their parental cells. Here, we reported that E1A inhibited activation of NF-kappaB and rendered cells more sensitive to TNF-induced apoptosis. We further showed that this inhibition was through suppression of IkappaB kinase (IKK) activity and IkappaB phosphorylation. Moreover, deletion of the p300 and Rb binding domains of E1A abolished its function in blocking IKK activity and IkappaB phosphorylation, suggesting that these domains are essential for the E1A function in down-regulating IKK activity and NF-kappaB signaling. However, the role of E1A in inhibiting IKK activity might be indirect. Nevertheless, our results suggest that inhibition of IKK activity by E1A is an important mechanism for the E1A-mediated sensitization of TNF-induced apoptosis.

Transactivation of the human cdc2 promoter by adenovirus E1A in cycling cells is mediated by induction of a 110-kDa CCAAT-box-binding factor.

Cyclin-dependent protein kinases (Cdks) are key regulatory proteins of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Cdc2 is expressed in late G1/S phase and functions in the G2 to M phase transition. Adenovirus E1A proteins are known to induce the expression of p34cdc2 and DNA synthesis in normal quiescent cells. In this study, mutational analysis of the human cdc2 promoter revealed that transactivation of the promoter by the E1A proteins in cycling cells is mediated through the two CCAAT box binding motifs. A 110-kDa protein (CBF/cdc2) was identified in nuclear extracts from monkey kidney (CV-1) cells stably expressing E1A as well as from adenovirus-transformed human 293 cells. Further, we show that this EIA-inducible CBF/cdc2 is related to the CBF which was shown to activate the heat shock protein 70 promoter. Analyses of the functional domain(s) of E1A required for the induction of the CBF and transactivation of the cdc2 promoter in these conditions revealed that E1A mutants which were defective in binding the pRB family of proteins or the cellular p300 protein were still active in assays measuring the induction of the CBF and transactivation of the cdc2 promoter, albeit with reduced efficiencies. But the E1A mutant which lost both functional domains was inactive in these assays. These results suggest that E1A has redundant functional domains for the induction of the 110-kDa CBF and activation of human cdc2 gene expression.

The carboxy-terminal region of adenovirus E1A activates transcription through targeting of a C-terminal binding protein-histone deacetylase complex

Binding of the C-terminal binding protein, CtBP, to the adenovirus E1A moiety of a Gal4-E1A fusion protein abolishes conserved region (CR) 1-dependent transcription activation. In contrast, a non-promoter targeted E1A peptide, capable of binding CtBP, can induce transcription from the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) promoter. CtBP is shown here to bind the histone deacetylase HDAC1, suggesting that a promoter targeted CtBP-HDAC1 complex can silence transcription from the PCNA promoter through a deacetylation mechanism. Expression of the CtBP binding domain of E1A is sufficient to alleviate repression, possibly due to the displacement of the CtBP-HDAC1 complex from the promoter.

Adenovirus E1A Inhibits Cardiac Myocyte-specific Gene Expression through Its Amino Terminus

Adenovirus E1A oncoproteins inhibit muscle-specific gene expression and myogenic differentiation by suppressing the transcriptional activating functions of basic helix-loop-helix proteins. As one approach to identifying cardiac-specific gene regulatory proteins, we analyzed the functional regions of E1A proteins that are required for muscle gene repression in cardiac cells. Myocyte-specific promoters, including the alpha-actins and alpha-myosin heavy chain, were selectively and potently inhibited (>90%) by E1A, while the ubiquitously expressed beta-actin promoter was only partially ( approximately 30%) repressed; endogenous gene expression was also affected. Distinct E1A protein binding sites mediated repression of muscle-specific and ubiquitous actin promoters. E1A-mediated inhibition of beta-actin required both an intact binding site for the tumor repressor proteins pRb and p107 and a second E1A domain (residues 15-35). In contrast, cardiac-specific promoter repression required the E1A amino-terminal residues 2-36. The proximal skeletal actin promoter (3' to base pair -153) was a target for repression by E1A. Although E1A binding to p300 was not required for inhibition of either promoter, co-expression of p300 partially reversed E1A-mediated transcriptional repression. We conclude that cardiac-specific and general promoter inhibition by E1A occurs by distinct mechanisms and that cardiac-specific gene expression is modulated by cellular factors interacting with the E1A p300/CBP-binding domain.