Documenting Traditions and the Ethnographic Double Bind Martha King (bio) The documentary short Madison County Project: Documenting the Sound (King and Roberts 2008) tells the story of two intertwined traditions: a local a cappella ballad tradition and a documentary tradition that has developed around the music. This article touches on the history of documentary making in the area, discusses the experience of attempting new fieldwork in Madison County, North Carolina, and illustrates some of the problematic outcomes of doing that fieldwork collaboratively. In attempting to create an ethnographically-based documentary project, issues regarding representation and the dilemmas of collaboration were amplified by historical precedent and the decision to explore the ballad tradition through the vehicle of a film intended for a wide public audience. The nature of this project forced a kind of accountability not always experienced by those who do not labor with the expectations of their consultants reading, viewing, critiquing, and being a part of the finished work. Introduction Nestled between Asheville and the Tennessee border, Madison County boasts a long-standing musical legacy and has become well-known for the ballads emanating from its front porches for generations. This reputation is due, in part, to the simplicity and beauty of the music itself—long, repetitive, a cappella ballads relaying stories of unrequited love, intrigue, and murder. Its reputation is also due to the generations of ballad collectors, enthusiasts, photographers, filmmakers, and folklorists [End Page 37] who have documented singing families in the area since Cecil Sharp, an English ballad collector, came through the county in 1916. This relationship stands as a pair of symbiotic traditions: a community of Appalachian singers perpetuating their craft generation after generation alongside an array of documentarians capturing the music of the Blue Ridge Mountains in photographs, film, recordings, and text. Despite long-running disagreements between these two groups over money, ownership, and authenticity, collaboration between singers and recorders has continued into the twenty-first century. The collections that Sharp created (Campbell and Sharp 1917; Karpeles 1932) and a subsequent book about his visit to Appalachia written by his assistant, Maud Karpeles (1967), were among the first works to shift the focus in Madison County from singing as an everyday practice to music as a publicly valued heritage. Each successive documenter utilized new forms of media that added new layers to both traditions' interactions with technology. Although none of these collectors, film-makers, photographers, or folklorists used media forms that were so new that they might be considered foreign or exotic, they used media in new ways to interact with the musical tradition. For instance, the motion picture was not a mysterious concept in the late 1960s and early 1970s in Madison County, but John Cohen's use of film prompted an entirely different local exposure to this modern media form (see, e.g., Cohen 1963, 1970). The same can be said for Cohen's Smithsonian release of Old Love Songs and Ballads from the Big Laurel, North Carolina (Cohen and Gott 1964). Similarly, there was nothing shockingly new about Rob Amberg's use of 35 mm film to document the cultural fabric of Sodom Laurel. But the publication of those photos in glossy book form—and the narrative collaboration that gave rise to much of the book's text—pushed the community into new forms of engagement with modern representation (Amberg 2002). My own documentary work in Madison County repeated this pattern. The consultants regarded neither digital video nor filmic representation as unfamiliar or unavailable. However, mediating that representation with an online weblog and presenting the documentary product via streaming video pushed the musical tradition to a new representational and collaborative space. The effects of different technological and ethnographic approaches on the dialogue between these dual traditions—the ballad tradition and the tradition of documentary work in the area—shaped my own [End Page 38] entrance into the field.1 My co-producer, Rob Roberts, and I choose to film and edit a documentary video about these two entwined traditions. Becoming part of the documentary tradition revealed that relationships between tradition, documentary, and modernity were more complicated than we had anticipated. This revelation emerged explicitly from our utilization of collaborative ethnography. The...
Read full abstract