DNA Loop Extrusion Research Articles

Symmetry of loop extrusion by dimeric SMC complexes is DNA-tension-dependent.

Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes organize and regulate genomes via DNA loop extrusion. During this process, the complexes increase the loop size by reeling in DNA from one or both sides of the loop. The factors governing this symmetry remain unclear. Here, we combine single-molecule analysis and molecular dynamic simulations to investigate the symmetry of loop extrusion of various SMC complexes. We find that whereas monomeric condensin and cohesin are one-sided extruders, the symmetry of dimeric SMCs, such as Smc5/6 and Wadjet, is DNA tension dependent. At low DNA tension (< 0.1pN), Smc5/6 and Wadjet extrude DNA from both sides of the loop. At higher tension, however, they transition to a behavior akin to one-sided extruders, yet still capable of extruding from one or the other side thereby switching the direction of extrusion. Our simulations further reveal that thermal fluctuations significantly influence loop extrusion symmetry, causing variations in DNA reeling rates between the two motors in the dimeric complexes and their direction switching at stalling tensions. Our findings challenge the previous view of loop extrusion symmetry as a fixed characteristic, revealing its dynamic nature and regulation by both intrinsic protein properties and extrinsic factors.

An extrinsic motor directs chromatin loop formation by cohesin.

The ring-shaped cohesin complex topologically entraps two DNA molecules to establish sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin also shapes the interphase chromatin landscape with wide-ranging implications for gene regulation, and cohesin is thought to achieve this by actively extruding DNA loops without topologically entrapping DNA. The 'loop extrusion' hypothesis finds motivation from in vitro observations-whether this process underlies in vivo chromatin loop formation remains untested. Here, using the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, we generate cohesin variants that have lost their ability to extrude DNA loops but retain their ability to topologically entrap DNA. Analysis of these variants suggests that in vivo chromatin loops form independently of loop extrusion. Instead, we find that transcription promotes loop formation, and acts as an extrinsic motor that expands these loops and defines their ultimate positions. Our results necessitate a re-evaluation of the loop extrusion hypothesis. We propose that cohesin, akin to sister chromatid cohesion establishment at replication forks, forms chromatin loops by DNA-DNA capture at places of transcription, thus unifying cohesin's two roles in chromosome segregation and interphase genome organisation.

Motor domain of condensin and step formation in extruding loop of DNA.

During the asymmetric loop extrusion of DNA by a condensin complex, one domain of the complex stably anchors to the DNA molecule, and another domain reels in the DNA strand into a loop. The DNA strand in the loop is fully relaxed, or there is no tension in the loop. Just outside of the loop, there is a tension that resists the extrusion of DNA. To maintain the extrusion of the DNA loop, the condensin complex must have a domain capable of generating a force to overcome the tension outside of the loop. This study proposes that the groove-shaped HEAT repeat domain Ycg1 plays the role of a molecular motor. A DNA molecule may bind to the groove electrostatically, and the weak binding force facilitates the random thermal motion of DNA molecules. A mechanical model that random collisions between DNA and the nonparallel inner surfaces of the groove may generate a directional force which is required for the loop extrusion to sustain. The hinge domain binds to the DNA molecule and acts as an anchor during asymmetric DNA loop extrusion. When the effects of ATP hydrolysis and the viscous drag of the fluid environment are considered, the motor-anchor model for the condensin complex and the mechanical model might explain the asymmetric loop extrusion, the formation of steps, the step size distribution in the loop extrusion, the tension-dependent extrusion speed, the interaction between coexisting loops on the DNA strand, and untying the knots during extrusion. This model can also explain the observed formation of the Z-loop.

STAG2-RAD21 complex: A unidirectional DNA ratchet mechanism in loop extrusion

DNA loop extrusion plays a key role in the regulation of gene expression and the structural arrangement of chromatin. Most existing mechanistic models of loop extrusion depend on some type of ratchet mechanism, which should permit the elongation of loops while preventing their collapse, by enabling DNA to move in only one direction. STAG2 is already known to exert a role as DNA anchor, but the available structural data suggest a possible role in unidirectional DNA motion. In this work, a computational simulation framework was constructed to evaluate whether STAG2 could enforce such unidirectional displacement of a DNA double helix. The results reveal that STAG2 V-shape allows DNA sliding in one direction, but blocks opposite DNA movement via a linear ratchet mechanism. Furthermore, these results suggest that RAD21 binding to STAG2 controls its flexibility by narrowing the opening of its V-shape, which otherwise remains widely open in absence of RAD21. Therefore, in the proposed model, in addition to its already described role as a DNA anchor, the STAG2-RAD21 complex would be part of a ratchet mechanism capable of exerting directional selectivity on DNA sliding during loop extrusion. The identification of the molecular basis of the ratchet mechanism of loop extrusion is a critical step in unraveling new insights into a broad spectrum of chromatin activities and their implications for the mechanisms of chromatin-related diseases.

DNA packaging by molecular motors: from bacteriophage to human chromosomes.

Dense packaging of genomic DNA is crucial for organismal survival, as DNA length always far exceeds the dimensions of the cells that contain it. Organisms, therefore, use sophisticated machineries to package their genomes. These systems range across kingdoms from a single ultra-powerful rotary motor that spools the DNA into a bacteriophage head, to hundreds of thousands of relatively weak molecular motors that coordinate the compaction of mitotic chromosomes in eukaryotic cells. Recent technological advances, such as DNA proximity-based sequencing approaches, polymer modelling and in vitro reconstitution of DNA loop extrusion, have shed light on the biological mechanisms driving DNA organization in different systems. Here, we discuss DNA packaging in bacteriophage, bacteria and eukaryotic cells, which, despite their extreme variation in size, structure and genomic content, all rely on the action of molecular motors to package their genomes.

NSE5 subunit interacts with distant regions of the SMC arms in the Physcomitrium patens SMC5/6 complex.

Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes play roles in cohesion, condensation, replication, transcription, and DNA repair. Their cores are composed of SMC proteins with a unique structure consisting of an ATPase head, long arm, and hinge. SMC complexes form long rod-like structures, which can change to ring-like and elbow-bent conformations upon binding ATP, DNA, and other regulatory factors. These SMC dynamic conformational changes are involved in their loading, translocation, and DNA loop extrusion. Here, we examined the binding and role of the PpNSE5 regulatory factor of Physcomitrium patens PpSMC5/6 complex. We found that the PpNSE5 C-terminal half (aa230-505) is required for binding to its PpNSE6 partner, while the N-terminal half (aa1-230) binds PpSMC subunits. Specifically, the first 71 amino acids of PpNSE5 were required for binding to PpSMC6. Interestingly, the PpNSE5 binding required the PpSMC6 head-proximal joint region and PpSMC5 hinge-proximal arm, suggesting a long distance between binding sites on PpSMC5 and PpSMC6 arms. Therefore, we hypothesize that PpNSE5 either links two antiparallel SMC5/6 complexes or binds one SMC5/6 in elbow-bent conformation, the later model being consistent with the role of NSE5/NSE6 dimer as SMC5/6 loading factor to DNA lesions. In addition, we generated the P.patens Ppnse5KO1 mutant line with an N-terminally truncated version of PpNSE5, which exhibited DNA repair defects while keeping a normal number of rDNA repeats. As the first 71 amino acids of PpNSE5 are required for PpSMC6 binding, our results suggest the role of PpNSE5-PpSMC6 interaction in SMC5/6 loading to DNA lesions.

Cohesin-Dependent Loop Extrusion: Molecular Mechanics and Role in Cell Physiology.

The most prominent representatives of multisubunit SMC complexes, cohesin and condensin, are best known as structural components of mitotic chromosomes. It turned out that these complexes, as well as their bacterial homologues, are molecular motors, the ATP-dependent movement of these complexes along DNA threads leads to the formation of DNA loops. In recent years, we have witnessed an avalanche-like accumulation of data on the process of SMC dependent DNA looping, also known as loop extrusion. This review briefly summarizes the current understanding of the place and role of cohesin-dependent extrusion in cell physiology and presents a number of models describing the potential molecular mechanism of extrusion in a most compelling way. We conclude the review with a discussion of how the capacity of cohesin to extrude DNA loops may be mechanistically linked to its involvement in sister chromatid cohesion.

Loop-extruding Smc5/6 organizes transcription-induced positive DNA supercoils

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes-cohesin, condensin, and the Smc5/6 complex (Smc5/6)-are essential for chromosome function. At the molecular level, these complexes fold DNA by loop extrusion. Accordingly, cohesin creates chromosome loops in interphase, and condensin compacts mitotic chromosomes. However, the role of Smc5/6's recently discovered DNA loop extrusion activity is unknown. Here, we uncover that Smc5/6 associates with transcription-induced positively supercoiled DNA at cohesin-dependent loop boundaries on budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) chromosomes. Mechanistically, single-molecule imaging reveals that dimers of Smc5/6 specifically recognize the tip of positively supercoiled DNA plectonemes and efficiently initiate loop extrusion to gather the supercoiled DNA into a large plectonemic loop. Finally, Hi-C analysis shows that Smc5/6 links chromosomal regions containing transcription-induced positive supercoiling in cis. Altogether, our findings indicate that Smc5/6 controls the three-dimensional organization of chromosomes by recognizing and initiating loop extrusion on positively supercoiled DNA.

Single-Molecule Approaches to Study DNA Condensation.

Proteins drive genome compartmentalization across different length scales. While the identities of these proteins have been well-studied, the physical mechanisms that drive genome organization have remained largely elusive. Studying these mechanisms is challenging owing to a lack of methodologies to parametrize physical models in cellular contexts. Furthermore, because of the complex, entangled, and dense nature of chromatin, conventional live imaging approaches often lack the spatial resolution to dissect these principles. In this chapter, we will describe how to image the interactions of λ-DNA with proteins under purified and cytoplasmic conditions. First, we will outline how to prepare biotinylated DNA, functionalize coverslips with biotin-conjugatedpoly-ethylene glycol (PEG), and assemble DNA microchannels compatible for the imaging of protein-DNA interactions using total internal fluorescence microscopy. Then we will describe experimental methods to image protein-DNA interactions in vitro and DNAloop extrusion using Xenopus laevis egg extracts.

How do molecular motors fold the genome?

A potential mechanism of DNA loop extrusion by molecular motors is discussed.

NIPBL and cohesin: new take on a classic tale.

Cohesin folds the genome in dynamic chromatin loops and holds the sister chromatids together. NIPBLScc2 is currently considered the cohesin loader, a role that may need reevaluation. NIPBL activates the cohesin ATPase, which is required for topological entrapment of sister DNAs and to fuel DNA loop extrusion, but is not required for chromatin association. Mechanistic dissection of these processes suggests that both NIPBL and the cohesin STAG subunit bind DNA. NIPBL also regulates conformational switches of the complex. Interactions of NIPBL with chromatin factors, including remodelers, replication proteins, and the transcriptional machinery, affect cohesin loading and distribution. Here, we discuss recent research addressing how NIPBL modulates cohesin activities and how its mutation causes a developmental disorder, Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS).

High-speed AFM imaging reveals DNA capture and loop extrusion dynamics by cohesin-NIPBL

3D chromatin organization plays a critical role in regulating gene expression, DNA replication, recombination, and repair. While initially discovered for its role in sister chromatid cohesion, emerging evidence suggests that the cohesin complex (SMC1, SMC3, RAD21, and SA1/SA2), facilitated by NIPBL, mediates topologically associating domains and chromatin loops through DNA loop extrusion. However, information on how conformational changes of cohesin-NIPBL drive its loading onto DNA, initiation, and growth of DNA loops is still lacking. In this study, high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging reveals that cohesin-NIPBL captures DNA through arm extension, assisted by feet (shorter protrusions), and followed by transfer of DNA to its lower compartment (SMC heads, RAD21, SA1, and NIPBL). While binding at the lower compartment, arm extension leads to the capture of a second DNA segment and the initiation of a DNA loop that is independent of ATP hydrolysis. The feet are likely contributed by the C-terminal domains of SA1 and NIPBL and can transiently bind to DNA to facilitate the loading of the cohesin complex onto DNA. Furthermore, high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging reveals distinct forward and reverse DNA loop extrusion steps by cohesin-NIPBL. These results advance our understanding of cohesin by establishing direct experimental evidence for a multistep DNA-binding mechanism mediated by dynamic protein conformational changes.

Current working models of SMC-driven DNA-loop extrusion.

Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins play a key roles in the chromosome organization by condensing two meters of DNA into cell-sized structures considered as the SMC protein extrudes DNA loop. Recent sequencing-based high-throughput chromosome conformation capture technique (Hi-C) and single-molecule experiments have provided direct evidence of DNA-loop extrusion. However, the molecular mechanism by which SMCs extrude a DNA loop is still under debate. Here, we review DNA-loop extrusion studies with single-molecule assays and introduce recent structural studies of how the ATP-hydrolysis cycle is coupled to the conformational changes of SMCs for DNA-loop extrusion. In addition, we explain the conservation of the DNA-binding sites that are vital for dynamic DNA-loop extrusion by comparing Cryo-EM structures of SMC complexes. Based on this information, we compare and discuss four compelling working models that explain how the SMC complex extrudes a DNA loop.

CRISPR screens in sister chromatid cohesion defective cells reveal PAXIP1-PAGR1 as regulator of chromatin association of cohesin.

The cohesin complex regulates higher order chromosome architecture through maintaining sister chromatid cohesion and folding chromatin by DNA loop extrusion. Impaired cohesin function underlies a heterogeneous group of genetic syndromes and is associated with cancer. Here, we mapped the genetic dependencies of human cell lines defective of cohesion regulators DDX11 and ESCO2. The obtained synthetic lethality networks are strongly enriched for genes involved in DNA replication and mitosis and support the existence of parallel sister chromatid cohesion establishment pathways. Among the hits, we identify the chromatin binding, BRCT-domain containing protein PAXIP1 as a novel cohesin regulator. Depletion of PAXIP1 severely aggravates cohesion defects in ESCO2 mutant cells, leading to mitotic cell death. PAXIP1 promotes global chromatin association of cohesin, independent of DNA replication, a function that cannot be explained by indirect effects of PAXIP1 on transcription or DNA repair. Cohesin regulation by PAXIP1 requires its binding partner PAGR1 and a conserved FDF motif in PAGR1. PAXIP1 co-localizes with cohesin on multiple genomic loci, including active gene promoters and enhancers. Possibly, this newly identified role of PAXIP1-PAGR1 in regulating cohesin occupancy on chromatin is also relevant for previously described functions of PAXIP1 in transcription, immune cell maturation and DNA repair.

Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion and sister chromatid cohesion by distinct mechanisms

Cohesin connects CTCF-binding sites and other genomic loci in cis to form chromatin loops and replicated DNA molecules in trans to mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Whether cohesin uses distinct or related mechanisms to perform these functions is unknown. Here, we describe a cohesin hinge mutant that can extrude DNA into loops but is unable to mediate cohesion in human cells. Our results suggest that the latter defect arises during cohesion establishment. The observation that cohesin's cohesion and loop extrusion activities can be partially separated indicates that cohesin uses distinct mechanisms to perform these two functions. Unexpectedly, the same hinge mutant can also not be stopped by CTCF boundaries as well as wild-type cohesin. This suggests that cohesion establishment and cohesin's interaction with CTCF boundaries depend on related mechanisms and raises the possibility that both require transient hinge opening to entrap DNA inside the cohesin ring.

Single cohesin molecules generate force by two distinct mechanisms

Spatial organization of DNA is facilitated by cohesin protein complexes that move on DNA and extrude DNA loops. How cohesin works mechanistically as a molecular machine is poorly understood. Here, we measure mechanical forces generated by conformational changes in single cohesin molecules. We show that bending of SMC coiled coils is driven by random thermal fluctuations leading to a ~32 nm head-hinge displacement that resists forces up to 1 pN; ATPase head engagement occurs in a single step of ~10 nm and is driven by an ATP dependent head-head movement, resisting forces up to 15 pN. Our molecular dynamic simulations show that the energy of head engagement can be stored in a mechanically strained conformation of NIPBL and released during disengagement. These findings reveal how single cohesin molecules generate force by two distinct mechanisms. We present a model, which proposes how this ability may power different aspects of cohesin-DNA interaction.

Cohesin‐mediated DNA loop extrusion resolves sister chromatids in G2 phase

Genetic information is stored in linear DNA molecules, which are highly folded inside cells. DNA replication along the folded template path yields two sister chromatids that initially occupy the same nuclear region in an intertwined arrangement. Dividing cells must disentangle and condense the sister chromatids into separate bodies such that a microtubule‐based spindle can move them to opposite poles. While the spindle‐mediated transport of sister chromatids has been studied in detail, the chromosome‐intrinsic mechanics presegregating sister chromatids have remained elusive. Here, we show that human sister chromatids resolve extensively already during interphase, in a process dependent on the loop‐extruding activity of cohesin, but not that of condensins. Increasing cohesin's looping capability increases sister DNA resolution in interphase nuclei to an extent normally seen only during mitosis, despite the presence of abundant arm cohesion. That cohesin can resolve sister chromatids so extensively in the absence of mitosis‐specific activities indicates that DNA loop extrusion is a generic mechanism for segregating replicated genomes, shared across different Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes in all kingdoms of life.

Testing pseudotopological and nontopological models for SMC-driven DNA loop extrusion against roadblock-traversal experiments

DNA loop extrusion by structural-maintenance-of-chromosome (SMC) complexes has emerged as a primary organizing principle for chromosomes. The mechanism by which SMC motor proteins extrude DNA loops is still unresolved and much debated. The ring-like structure of SMC complexes prompted multiple models where the extruded DNA is topologically or pseudotopologically entrapped within the ring during loop extrusion. However, recent experiments showed the passage of roadblocks much bigger than the SMC ring size, suggesting a nontopological mechanism. Recently, attempts were made to reconcile the observed passage of large roadblocks with a pseudotopological mechanism. Here we examine the predictions of these pseudotopological models and find that they are not consistent with new experimental data on SMC roadblock encounters. Particularly, these models predict the formation of two loops and that roadblocks will reside near the stem of the loop upon encounter—both in contrast to experimental observations. Overall, the experimental data reinforce the notion of a nontopological mechanism for extrusion of DNA.

Looping the Genome with SMC Complexes.

SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) protein complexes are an evolutionarily conserved family of motor proteins that hold sister chromatids together and fold genomes throughout the cell cycle by DNA loop extrusion. These complexes play a key role in a variety of functions in the packaging and regulation of chromosomes, and they have been intensely studied in recent years. Despite their importance, the detailed molecular mechanism for DNA loop extrusion by SMC complexes remains unresolved. Here, we describe the roles of SMCs in chromosome biology and particularly review in vitro single-molecule studies that have recently advanced our understanding of SMC proteins. We describe the mechanistic biophysical aspects of loop extrusion that govern genome organization and its consequences.

Preprint Highlight: Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion and sister chromatid cohesion by distinct mechanisms

Cohesins organize chromatin within the nucleus by promoting loop extrusion via cis contacts on chromatin and sister chromatid cohesion via trans contacts between chromatids. Whether cohesins employ a distinct mechanism for these two functions is not known. The authors use a carefully designed conditional expression of cohesin, mutated at its hinge domain, and assess its function with a variety of in vitro and in vivo experiments including live TIRF imaging, loop extrusion assay, Hi-C, and calibrated ChIP sequencing. A mutation in the hinge domain separates the two functions of cohesin, as the mutant supports loop extrusion but not sister chromatid cohesion. A unique mechanism of cohesins in promoting loop extrusion has implications for their distinct role in genome organization and for transcriptional regulation and cell fate determination. This study will be of broad interest to genome biologists with respect to these phenomena. This preprint has been assigned the following badges: New Hypothesis, New Materials. Read the preprint on bioRxiv ( Nagasaka et al., 2022 ): https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.23.509019 .