dMMR Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for dMMR and pMMR colorectal cancers: therapeutic strategies and putative biomarkers of response.

Approximately 15% of locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRC) have DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), resulting in high microsatellite instability and a high tumour mutational burden. These cancers are frequently sensitive to therapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the metastatic setting. This sensitivity seems to be even more pronounced in locally advanced disease, and organ preservation has become a realistic aim in ongoing clinical trials involving patients with dMMR rectal cancer. By contrast, metastatic CRCs with proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) are generally resistant to ICIs, although a proportion of locally advanced pMMR tumours seem to have a high degree of sensitivity to ICIs. In this Review, we describe the current and emerging clinical evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with dMMR and pMMR CRC, and the potential advantages (based on a biological rationale) of such an approach. We discuss how neoadjuvant 'window-of-opportunity' trials are being leveraged to progress biomarker discovery and we provide an overview of potential predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs, exploring the challenges faced when evaluating such biomarkers in biopsy-derived samples. Lastly, we describe how these discoveries might be used to drive a rational approach to trialling novel immunotherapeutic strategies in patients with pMMR CRC, with the ultimate aim of disease eradication and the generation of long-term immunosurveillance.

T cell factor 1 (TCF-1) defines T cell differentiation in colorectal cancer

The presence of precursor to exhausted (Tpex) CD8+ Tcells is important to maintain robust immunity following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Impressive responses to ICI are emerging in patients with stage II-III mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC). We found 64% of dMMR and 15% of mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) stage III CRCs had a high frequency of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL-hi). Furthermore, expression of TCF-1 (Tcf7) by CD8+ Tcells predicted improved patient prognosis and Tpex cells (CD3+CD8+TCF-1+PD-1+) were abundant within lymphoid aggregatesof stage III CRCs. In contrast, CD3+CD8+TCF-1-PD-1+ cells were more abundant at the invasive front and tumor core, while γδ Tcells were equally abundant in all tumor areas. Interestingly, no differencesin the frequency of Tpex cells were observed between TIL-hi dMMR and TIL-hi pMMR CRCs. Therefore, Tpex cell function and ICI response rates in TIL-hi CRC warrants further investigation.

COX inhibition with anti-PD-1 in advanced dMMR colorectal cancer: Improving antigen presentation?

dMMR tumors, which have high tumor mutational and neoantigen burdens, are highly responsive to immune checkpoint blockade. Wu etal.1 showed that combining COX inhibitors with PD-1 blockade could be a safe and effective treatment option for dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer. The study highlights the potential of this combination therapy in achieving deep and long-lasting responses in dMMR colorectal cancers.

Interim results of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with prolgolimab in patients with locally advanced MSI / dMMR colorectal cancer

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is one of the leading malignancies in Russia [1]. The standard approach for selected patients (pts) with locally advanced colon cancer is surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy. Several studies have shown that colorectal cancer (CRC) with presence of a disorder in the mismatch repair (dMMR) / microsatellite instability (MSI) is characterized with high sensitivity to the immune checkpoint inhibitors. Several studies have shown that MSI / dMMR CRC patients tend to be more responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, nivolumab or ipilimumab. However, there was no information about the efficacy of prolgolimab, a PD-1 receptor blocking antibody. Prolgolimab was highly effective in melanoma treatment, while the toxicity was comparable to pembrolizumab and nivolumab. Methods: We initiated the phase II non-randomized open-label clinical trial. Inclusion criteria were: histologically verified, MSI / dMMR, clinical stage II–III CRC. According to study protocol, prolgolimab (1 mg / kg) is administered every two weeks, then surgery should be done after 6 months of immunotherapy (12 cycles). In case of surgical treatment refusal, the systemic treatment proceeds for 1 year. The co-primary endpoint was the complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included tumor regression grade by Mandard (TRG), major pathologic response (MPR), overall response rate (ORR) disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Here is a presentation of safety and pathologic response data — rates of pCR / MPR, objective response rate. Results: A total of 26 patients began treatment with prolgolimab from April, 2022 to February, 2024. Immune-related adverse effects of grade III–IV, were recorded in 1 (3,8 %) patient (autoimmune hepatitis grade IV); 4 (15,4 %) patients had adverse effects grade I–II: autoimmune thyroiditis, diarrhea, hypothyroidism. Two patients were refused to make a surgical treatment because of clinical CR and possible volume of surgery. Nine (34,6 %) patients underwent surgical treatment within 3 months after the immunotherapy completion: 7 patients had TRG 1 and pCR, 2 — TRG 2 and MPR after the treatment. ORR was 100 %, complete clinical response rate 40 %. The study is still ongoing, DFS and OS will be announced in further publications. Median follow-up time was 5 months. Conclusion: The first interim analysis data suggest a strong potential for neoadjuvant immunotherapy to become standard of care and allow further exploration of organ-sparing approaches in MMR / MSI CRC patients.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of sporadic mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of sporadic mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer. Methods: A total of 120 cases of sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer from July 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively collected in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Patients with Lynch syndrome; synchronous multiple colorectal cancers; preoperative anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy; and those with incomplete follow-up information were excluded based on family history and next-generation sequencing (NGS) test results. Immunohistochemical stains were used to detect the expression of mismatch repair proteins, methylation-specific PCR for methylation testing, and fluorescent PCR for BRAF V600E gene mutation detection. The clinical and pathological data, and gene mutation status were analyzed. Follow-up was done to assess survival and prognosis including progression-free survival and overall survival rate. Results: Sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer occurred more frequently in the right side of the colon, in females, and in the elderly. Morphologically, it was mostly moderately-differentiated, and most patients had low-grade tumor budding. In terms of immunohistochemical expression, MLH1 and PMS2 loss were dominant, and there were age and location-specificities in protein expression. MLH1 methylation was commonly detected in elderly female patients and rare in young male patients; while MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency, and BRAF V600E mutation occurred more often on the right side (P<0.05). The 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 90.7% and 88.7% respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.8% and 90.7% respectively. Tumor budding status was an independent risk factor affecting patient recurrence (hazard ratio=3.375, 95% confidence interval: 1.060-10.741, P=0.039), patients with low-grade tumor budding had better prognosis, and those with medium or high-grade tumor budding had poor prognosis. Conclusion: For dMMR colorectal cancer patients, tumor budding status is an independent risk factor for recurrence.

Analysis of clinical characteristics of mismatch repair status in colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

BackgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI) caused by DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is of great significance in the occurrence, diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC).AimThis study aimed to analyze the relationship between mismatch repair status and clinical characteristics of CRC.MethodsThe histopathological results and clinical characteristics of 2029 patients who suffered from CRC and underwent surgery at two centers from 2018 to 2020 were determined. After screening the importance of clinical characteristics through machine learning algorithms, the patients were divided into deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) groups based on the immunohistochemistry results and the clinical feature data between the two groups were observed by statistical methods.ResultsThe dMMR and pMMR groups had significant differences in histologic type, TNM stage, maximum tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, differentiation grade, gross appearance, and vascular invasion. There were significant differences between the MLH1 groups in age, histologic type, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, tumor location, and depth of invasion. The MSH2 groups were significantly different in age. The MSH6 groups had significant differences in age, histologic type, and TNM stage. There were significant differences between the PMS2 groups in lymph node metastasis and tumor location. CRC was dominated by MLH1 and PMS2 combined expression loss (41.77%). There was a positive correlation between MLH1 and MSH2 and between MSH6 and PMS2 as well.ConclusionsThe proportion of mucinous adenocarcinoma, protruding type, and poor differentiation is relatively high in dMMR CRCs, but lymph node metastasis is rare. It is worth noting that the expression of MMR protein has different prognostic significance in different stages of CRC disease.

The Association of Mismatch Repair Status with Microscopically Positive (R1) Margins in Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundThere is mounting evidence that microscopically positive (R1) margins in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) may represent a surrogate for aggressive cancer biology rather than technical failure during surgery. However, whether detectable biological differences exist between CRC with R0 and R1 margins is unknown. We sought to investigate whether mismatch repair (MMR) status differs between Stage III CRC with R0 or R1 margins.MethodsPatients treated for Stage III CRC from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 were identified by using the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database. Patients were stratified according to MMR status (proficient [pMMR] vs. deficient [dMMR]) and margin status. Outcomes of interest included the R1 rate according to MMR and overall survival.ResultsA total of 3636 patients were included, of whom 473 (13.0%) had dMMR colorectal cancers. Patients with dMMR cancers were more likely to be elderly, female, and have right-sided cancers. R1 margins were significantly more common in patients with dMMR cancers (20.5% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.001), with the greatest difference seen in the rate of R1 margins related to the primary tumour (8.9% vs. 4.7%) rather than to lymph node metastases (11.6% vs. 10.5%). This association was seen in both right- and left-sided cancers. On multivariable analyses, R1 margins, but not MMR status, were associated with poorer survival, alongside age, pN stage, perineural invasion, and extramural venous invasion.ConclusionsIn patients with Stage III CRC, dMMR status is associated with increased risks of R1 margins following potentially curative surgery, supporting the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this patient group.

Predictors for dMMR colorectal cancer in patients with serrated lesions and polyps – A register-based cohort study

BackgroundSerrated lesions and polyps (SP) are precursors of up to 30 % of colorectal cancers (CRC) through the serrated pathway. This often entails early BRAF mutations and MLH1 hypermethylation leading to mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) CRC. We investigated predictors of dMMR CRC among patients with co-occurrence of CRC and SP to increase our knowledge on the serrated pathway. MethodsWe used data from The Danish Pathology Registry and Danish Colorectal Cancer Groups Database from the period 2010–2021 to investigate risk factors for development of dMMR CRC. We used logistic regression models to identify difference in risk factors of developing dMMR CRC in comparison to CRC with proficient MMR (pMMR). ResultsWe included 3273 patients with a median age of 70.7 years [64.3,76.4] of which 1850 (56.5 %) were male. dMMR CRC was present in 592 patients (18.1 %), with loss of MLH1/PMS2 being most common. The risk of dMMR CRC was significantly higher in females OR 3.47 [2.87;4.20]. When adjusting for age, SP subtype, conventional adenomas (CA), anatomical location and lifestyle factors, female sex remained the strongest predictor OR 2.84 [2.27;3.56]. The presence of sessile serrated lesions with or without dysplasia was related to higher risk OR 1.60 [1.11;2.31] and OR 1.42 [1.11;1.82] respectively, while conventional adenomas constituted a lower risk OR 0.68 [0.55;0.84]. ConclusionIn conclusion we found several predictors of whom female sex had the strongest correlation with dMMR CRC in patients with SP.

The relationship between mismatch repair (MMR) proteins status and the response to conventional neoadjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC).

e15627 Background: MMR proteins status is not routinely detected in CRC patients. Neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) CRC patients can achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 60-100%. Conversely, dMMR/MSI-H patients may exhibit a poor response to conventional neoadjuvant therapy, although supporting evidence is limited. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical data from patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 2008 to 2021, excluding those who received neoadjuvant ICIs. MMR proteins were detected using immunohistochemistry on surgical samples or preoperative colonoscopy biopsy samples, and some patients underwent genetic testing to evaluate their microsatellite status. This study included M0 CRC patients with complete tumor regression grading (TRG) assessment and MMR/MSI status. Responses were assessed using TRG evaluation (AJCC-TRG system) on the primary tumor. Results: Among 1005 patients, the median age was 57 years (range: 19-95), with 643 males (64.0%) and 362 females (36.0%). Seventy-two (7.2%) had right colon cancer, 80 (8.0%) had left colon cancer, and 853 (84.9%) had rectal cancer. Fifty-five (5.5%) had dMMR, and 950 (94.5%) had proficient mismatch repair (pMMR). In dMMR patients, defective proteins included hMLH1 and PMS2 combined in 22 patients, hMSH6 in 14 patients, PMS2 in 9 patients, hMSH6 and hMSH2 combined in 6 patients, hMLH1 in 2 patients, hMLH1 and hMSH6 combined in 1 patient, and hMSH6, PMS2, and hMSH2 combined in 1 patient. Compared to pMMR patients, dMMR patients showed either no response or poor response to conventional neoadjuvant therapy, with no patients exhibiting TRG = 0/1. One hundred and eleven (11.7%) pMMR patients showed a good response (TRG = 0/1). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the two groups of patients (HR, 1.547; 95% CI: 0.9221-2.596; P = 0.172). Conclusions: Although our study is retrospective and some patients with pCR lacked MMR expression information, we can still conclude that dMMR patients have a poor response to conventional neoadjuvant therapy, and neoadjuvant ICIs treatment may be a better choice for dMMR patients. We recommend routine immunohistochemistry of MMR proteins in preoperative colonoscopies to guide the development of neoadjuvant strategies. [Table: see text]

Spatially resolved multi-region proteomics for prediction of clinical outcome in deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer treated with PD-1 blockade.

3520 Background: In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR), we previously found transcriptomic signatures reflecting stromal compartment composition and proliferative capacity that can predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). To identify proteomic markers of response and/or resistance to ICB, we performed spatially resolved proteomic analysis of the tumor microenvironment. Methods: Patients with surgically resected, primary dMMR metastatic CRCs received pembrolizumab (Mayo Clinic, N=30). In FFPE tissues, Digital Spatial Profiling of 71 proteins was performed using panels covering immune cells, immune activation, cell death, PI3/AKT signaling, MAPK signaling, and pan-tumor markers (GeoMx nCounter). In ten regions of interest/slide (~600 µm2) at the tumor invasive margin, protein expression was determined in four cellular compartments: epithelium (panCK+), immune cells (CD45+; leucocyte common antigen), stroma (panCK-), and nonimmune stroma (panCK-/CD45-). After normalization, protein abundance per compartment was analyzed by response (RECIST 1.1) [OmicVerse Python]. Differentially expressed proteins (binary) were examined by progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox regression with covariate adjustment (Lifelines Python). Results: Pre-treatment panels including 71 proteins were analyzed by treatment response and PFS after PD-1 inhibition. Proteins found to be significantly associated with response (p&lt; 0.01) and PFS are described. Across all compartments, responders showed upregulation of NK cells and T cell subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+), and ICOS; strongest association was found for CD4+: HRadj: 0.16; 95%CI: 0.08-0.31; p&lt; 0.001. Nonresponders showed higher phospho-JNK (HRadj: 2.09; 95%CI: 1.28-3.42; p=0.003) and SMA. In the epithelial compartment, upregulation of the Treg marker CD25 and reduced caspase-9 were observed in responders. Among responders, the stromal compartment was highly enriched in HLA-DR, dendritic cells (CD11c), PD-L1, immune activation markers (CD40, CD44, CD80, CD27), CD95/Fas, and GZMB. In the stromal compartment, downregulation of BCL6 and phospho-GSK3B was observed in responders. The immune compartment of responders showed increased beta2-microglobulin and Ki-67, while the non-immune stromal compartment showed increase in the macrophage marker CD68. Importantly, proteins found to be upregulated in responders were significantly and independently associated with longer PFS whereas the opposite was true for nonresponders. Conclusions: In metastatic dMMR CRCs, spatially defined protein markers were significantly associated with anti-PD-1 response, and independently associated with patient PFS (strongest predictive utility for CD4 in immune stroma and phospho-JNK in epithelium).

Death receptors 4/5 mediate tumour sensitivity to natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity in mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer.

Identifying the target of natural killer (NK) cells in colorectal cancer (CRC) is critical for optimising the clinical use of NK cell-mediated immunotherapy. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is associated with high immune cell infiltration and MHC Class I defects. Whether dMMR CRC responses to NK cell therapy remains unclear. MLH1, DR4, and DR5 knockout cell lines were established using CRISPR-Cas9 system. NK92-MI or NK cell isolated from BABL/C mice were used as effector cells against tumour cells. Inflammatory cytokines secretion by CRC cells was assessed via cytokine analysis. NK-cell-deficient/proficient animal models were used to validate the NK cell sensitivity. We observed that dMMR CRC cells were more sensitive to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity than were mismatch-repair-proficient (pMMR) CRC cells. In dMMR CRC, Death receptor (DR)4/5 was upregulated and mediated sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. DR4/5-mediated secretion of interleukin -12 sustained NK cell viability in dMMR CRC. NK cell depletion induced dMMR CRC tumour growth, and NK cell transfer inhibited lung metastasis of dMMR CRC with DR4/5 expression in vivo. TP53 upregulated DR4/DR5 expression in dMMR CRC. dMMR associated with increased sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in CRC. DR4/DR5 sensitise dMMR CRC to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Microsatellite instability in mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer: clinical features and underlying molecular mechanisms

Both defects in mismatch repair (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) have been recognised as crucial biomarkers that guide treatment strategies and disease management in colorectal cancer (CRC). As MMR and MSI tests are being widely conducted, an increasing number of MSI-H tumours have been identified in CRCs with mismatch repair proficiency (pMMR). The objective of this study was to assess the clinical features of patients with pMMR/MSI-H CRC and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism in these cases. From January 2015 to December 2018, 1684 cases of pMMR and 401 dMMR CRCs were enrolled. Of those patients, 93 pMMR/MSI-H were identified. The clinical phenotypes and prognosis were analysed. Frozen and paraffin-embedded tissue were available in 35 patients with pMMR/MSI-H, for which comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analyses were performed. In comparison to pMMR/MSS CRCs, pMMR/MSI-H CRCs exhibited significantly less tumour progression and better long-term prognosis. The pMMR/MSI-H cohorts displayed a higher presence of CD8+ T cells and NK cells when compared to the pMMR/MSS group. Mutational signature analysis revealed that nearly all samples exhibited deficiencies in MMR genes, and we also identified deleterious mutations in MSH3-K383fs. This study revealed pMMR/MSI-H CRC as a distinct subgroup within CRC, which manifests diverse clinicopathological features and long-term prognostic outcomes. Distinct features in the tumour immune-microenvironment were observed in pMMR/MSI-H CRCs. Pathogenic deleterious mutations in MSH3-K383fs were frequently detected, suggesting another potential biomarker for identifying MSI-H. This work was supported by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20DZ1100101).

Mismatch repair protein deficiency and its implications on distant metastasis in colorectal cancer: A comprehensive analysis.

While previous studies have indicated variability in distant metastatic potential among different mismatch repair (MMR) states in colorectal cancer (CRC), their findings remain inconclusive, especially considering potential differences across various ethnic backgrounds. Furthermore, the gene regulatory networks and the underlying mechanisms responsible for these variances in metastatic potential across MMR states have yet to be elucidated. We collected 2058 consecutive primary CRC samples from the South West of China and assessed the expression of MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) using immunohistochemistry. To explore the inconsistencies between different MMR statuses and recurrence, we performed a meta-analysis. To delve deeper, we employed Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), ClueGo, and iRegulon, pinpointing gene expression networks and key regulatory molecules linked to metastasis and recurrence in CRC. Lastly, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to determine the impact of core regulatory molecules on metastasis. Of the samples, 8.2% displayed deficient MMR (dMMR), with losses of MLH1 and PSM2 observed in 40.8% and 63.9%, respectively. A unique 24.3% isolated loss of PMS2 without concurrent metastasis was identified, a result that diverges from established literature. Additionally, our meta-analysis further solidifies the reduced recurrence likelihood in dMMR CRC samples compared to proficient MMR (pMMR). Two gene expression networks tied to distant metastasis and recurrence were identified, with a majority of metastasis-related genes located on chromosomes 8 and 18. An IRF1 positive feedback loop was discerned in the metastasis-related network, and IRF1 was identified as a predictive marker for both recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival across multiple datasets. Geographical and ethnic factors might influence peculiarities in MMR protein loss. Our findings also highlight new gene expression networks and crucial regulatory molecules in CRC metastasis, enhancing our comprehension of the mechanisms driving distant metastasis.

Abstract 5153: Pyramidobacter-DMMR synergy in colorectal cancer: Unveiling prognostic impact, mechanistic insights, and tumor microenvironment dynamics

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits a heightened presence of intratumoral bacteria, and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) contributes to nucleotide mismatch accumulation, fostering mutagenesis. However, the combined impact of intratumoral bacteria and dMMR on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in CRC, and its consequential influence on patient prognosis, remains elusive. Methods: We utilized samples from the Cancer Microbiome Atlas project (TCMA), collecting tumor and matched paracancer tissues from colorectal cancer patients. Phyloseq in R was employed to scrutinize microbial abundance differences. The effects of microbial enrichment on prognosis were assessed through survival analysis, and GSEA enrichment analysis provided mechanistic insights. Results: A total of 173 samples, including 28 dMMR tumors, 112 proficient MMR (pMMR) tumors, and 22 paired para-cancer tissues, were collected. Following stringent filtration, we analyzed 230 bacterial genera. Notably, 26 genera, including Fusobacterium and Streptococcus, showed significant enrichment in dMMR tumors compared to para-cancer tissues. Furthermore, 18 genera were enriched in dMMR tumors compared to pMMR tumors. Of these, 8 genera like Desulfovibrio and Pyramidobacter consistently exhibited enrichment in dMMR CRC compared to either para-cancer tissues or pMMR tumors. Survival analysis highlighted Pyramidobacter as the only genus significantly associated with prognosis in dMMR CRC. Increased Pyramidobacter abundance correlated with decreased overall survival (OS) (P value: 0.049). Stratifying dMMR CRC patients based on Pyramidobacter abundance further emphasized the significantly worse survival in the Pyramidobacter-High group (HR 0.93, 95%CI 1.03-9.60, log-rank p = 0.015). Exploring the impact of Pyramidobacter infection on tumor progression, we assessed TIME and oncogenic pathways between Pyramidobacter-Low and Pyramidobacter-High groups. While overall immune infiltration was higher in the Pyramidobacter-High group, it primarily stemmed from increased B cell and naive CD8+ T cell infiltration. Importantly, pathways enriched in the Pyramidobacter-High group included inflammatory response, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and KRAS signaling, while those enriched in the Pyramidobacter-Low group encompassed IFNα response, IFNγ response, and DNA damage repair. These findings suggest Pyramidobacter's role in inducing inflammation, promoting tumor proliferation and metastasis, and suppressing interferon response. Conclusion: Pyramidobacter emerges as a key player in the development of dMMR CRC, exerting a pivotal influence on patient prognosis through the induction of inflammatory responses and EMT. Citation Format: Shisen LI, Yunlong LI, Hongjiang Ma, Shihao Qin, Feilong Zhao, Jipeng Li. Pyramidobacter-DMMR synergy in colorectal cancer: Unveiling prognostic impact, mechanistic insights, and tumor microenvironment dynamics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5153.

Abstract 700: Impact of heterogeneity for mismatch repair activity on colon tumor development and therapeutic response

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancers (CRC) that are deficient for DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) proteins have high levels of genetic instability and consequently high mutational burden, creating numerous neoantigens that can elicit an immune response. Therefore, dMMR CRC are the best candidates for immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) compared to proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) CRC. Early clinical trials revealed that only 30-55% metastatic dMMR CRC responded to ICI. Recent studies utilizing allograft models have demonstrated that tumor immune landscape can be primed with radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Although early results have been quite promising, allograft models often fail to accurately predict efficacy for many reasons, but most often are due to a lack of heterogeneity. Methods: To better understand how heterogenous MMR expression impacts tumor development and response to ICI alone or in combination with RPT, we developed a new mouse model that develops three tumor types: (1) homotypic dMMR tumors that express green fluorescent protein, (2) homotypic pMMR tumors that express red fluorescent protein, and (3) heterotypic tumors with a mixture of dMMR and pMMR cells. Surveillance bright field and fluorescent colonoscopies allow us to assess treatment response by measuring tumor size and proportion of dMMR and pMMR tumor cells in real-time. These outcomes are verified through ex vivo imaging and histological analysis. Results: Tumor response to anti-PD-L1 ICI was dependent on MMR status. Homotypic dMMR tumors exhibited the strongest response: significantly smaller in treated mice than controls, exhibited areas of vascular congestion and increased CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells infiltration. Response of heterotypic MMR tumors varied depending on percentage of dMMR cells; tumors with a high percentage of dMMR cells remained small, whereas tumors with a low percentage of dMMR had an outgrowth of pMMR cells. Treated and untreated homotypic pMMR tumors were indistinguishable. To enhance the response of all three tumor types, mice were treated with dual ICI treatment, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4, or RPT. Animals administered the tri-therapy (dual ICI + RPT) survived significantly longer with fewer tumors than animals treated with either dual ICI or RPT alone. Conclusions: Our innovative mouse model allows for the highly detailed characterization of tumor response to therapies. Simplistic allograft models may not adequately account for the dynamic effects that neighboring cell death may have on radio-resistant cells, on tumor vascular perfusion and oxygenation, or on tumor immune infiltration and adaptive immune recognition of remaining cells. We begin to fill these critical gaps in knowledge and therefore the results from our studies will help guide the translation and integrated use of ICIs and RPTs in clinic. Citation Format: Santina M. Snow, Dawn Albrecht, Paul A. Clark, Caroline P. Kerr, Joseph J. Grudzinski, Justin J. Jeffery, Hansel Comas Rojas, Reinier Hernandez, Kristina A. Matkowskyj, Jamey P. Weichert, Zachary S. Morris, Richard B. Halberg. Impact of heterogeneity for mismatch repair activity on colon tumor development and therapeutic response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 700.

Abstract 520: circBRIP1 RNA as a non-invasive target engagement pharmacodynamic biomarker for DHX9 inhibition

Abstract DHX9 is a multifunctional DEAH-box ATP-independent RNA helicase which has been reported to play important roles in replication, transcription, translation, RNA splicing and RNA processing which contribute to DHX9’s role in maintenance of genomic stability. DHX9 can bind specifically to inverted repeat Alu elements, preventing back-splicing events that lead to circular RNA and exon skipping of the linear transcript. Upon DHX9 inhibition, a robust induction of Alu-mediated circular RNA is observed. For example, circBRIP1 is an Alu-mediated circular RNA that is robustly elevated upon DHX9 loss, with no observed change to levels of linear BRIP1. Here we describe data demonstrating circBRIP1 as a DHX9 specific target engagement pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker and its potential utility as a non-invasive clinical PD biomarker. We have previously demonstrated that DHX9 inhibition by novel small molecule inhibitors is efficacious in microsatellite instable (MSI) colorectal cancer (CRC) with defective mismatch repair (dMMR), both in vitro and in vivo. DHX9 inhibition in the HCT116 dMMR CRC cell line results in a robust dose dependent induction of the Alu-mediated circular RNA, circBRIP1, as early as 6 hours after compound treatment. The development of lead series DHX9 inhibitors exhibited a positive correlation between circBRIP1 EC50 and DHX9 biochemical activity, as well as proliferation inhibition in a dMMR CRC cell line. However, dose dependent induction of circBRIP1 following DHX9 inhibition occurs with similar potencies across DHX9i sensitive and insensitive CRC cell lines. This suggests that elevation of circBRIP1 is a unique proximal target engagement PD biomarker of DHX9 inhibition, but not a predictor of DHX9 sensitivity. Importantly, induction of circBRIP1 is observed intratumorally in human xenograft in vivo efficacy studies in mice. Induction in each individual tumor correlates with observed tool compound exposure, providing evidence of a predictable PK/PD relationship. We also observe dose dependent circBRIP1 induction in mouse peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). We have extended these studies to primary human whole blood, where we see robust dose dependent induction of circBRIP1 after ex vivo treatment with DHX9 inhibitor for 24 hours. Altogether, these studies show evidence for the utility of circBRIP1 as a non-invasive target engagement biomarker for DHX9 inhibitors in the clinic. Citation Format: David Brennan, Jennifer Castro, Matthew H. Daniels, Monique Laidlaw, Chuang Lu, Stephen J. Blakemore, Serena J. Silver, P. Ann Boriack-Sjodin, Kenneth W. Duncan, Jason A. Sager, Robert A. Copeland. circBRIP1 RNA as a non-invasive target engagement pharmacodynamic biomarker for DHX9 inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 520.

Sporadic deficient mismatch repair in colorectal cancer increases the risk for non-colorectal malignancy: A European multicenter cohort study.

Disparities between tumors arising via different sporadic carcinogenetic pathways have not been studied systematically. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluated the differences in the risk for non-colorectal malignancy between sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from different DNA mismatch repair status. A retrospective European multicenter cohort study including in total of 1706 CRC patients treated between 1996 and 2019 in three different countries. The proficiency (pMMR) or deficiency (dMMR) of mismatch repair was determined by immunohistochemistry. Cases were analyzed for tumor BRAFV600E mutation, and BRAF mutated tumors were further analyzed for hypermethylation status in the promoter region of MLH1 to distinguish between sporadic and hereditary cases. Swedish and Finish patients were matched with their respective National Cancer Registries. For the Czech cohort, thorough scrutiny of medical files was performed to identify any non-colorectal malignancy within 20 years before or after the diagnosis of CRC. Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify the incidence rates of non-colorectal malignancies. For validation purposes, standardized incidence ratios were calculated for the Swedish cases adjusted for age, year, and sex. Of the 1706 CRC patients included in the analysis, 819 were female [48%], median age at surgery was 67 years [interquartile range: 60-75], and sporadic dMMR was found in 188 patients (11%). Patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) for non-colorectal malignancy before and after diagnosis compared to patients with a pMMR tumor, in both uni- (IRR = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89-3.31, p = 0.003) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.67-3.01, p = 0.004). This association applied whether or not the non-colorectal tumor developed before or after the diagnosis of CRC in both uni- (IRR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.28-2.98, p = 0.004), (IRR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.72-3.49, p = 0.004) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 1.67,95% CI = 1.05-2.65, p = 0.029), (IRR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.63-3.42, p = 0.005), respectively. In this retrospective European multicenter cohort study, patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher risk for non-colorectal malignancy than those with pMMR CRC. These findings indicate the need for further studies to establish the need for and design of surveillance strategies for patients with dMMR CRC.

Targeting MEK/COX-2 axis improve immunotherapy efficacy in dMMR colorectal cancer with PIK3CA overexpression.

PIK3CA mutation or overexpression is associated with immunotherapy resistance in multiple cancer types, but is also paradoxically associated with benefit of COX-2 inhibition on patient survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). This study examined whether and how PIK3CA status affected COX-2-mediated tumor inflammation and immunotherapy response of dMMR CRC. Murine colon cancer cells MC38, CT26, and CT26-Mlh1-KO were used to construct PIK3CA knockdown and overexpression models to mimic dMMR CRC with PIK3CA dysregulation, and xenograft models were used to evaluate how PIK3CA regulate COX-2 expression, CD8+ T cells infiltration, tumor growth, and therapy response to anti-PD-L1 treatment using immunocompetent mice. Western blot was carried out to delineate the signaling pathways in human and mouse cancer cells, and immunohistochemical analysis together with bioinformatics analysis using human patient samples. PIK3CA upregulates COX-2 expression through MEK/ERK signaling pathway independent of AKT signaling to promote tumor inflammation and immunosuppression. PIK3CA knockdown profoundly reduced CT26 tumor growth in a CD8+ T cell-dependent manner, while PIK3CA overexpression significantly inhibited CD8+ T cells infiltration and promoted tumor growth. Furthermore, MEK or COX-2 inhibition augmented the anti-tumor activity of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy on dMMR CRC mouse models, accompanied with increased CD8+ T cells infiltration and activated tumor microenvironment. Our results identified that the PIK3CA hyperactivation in dMMR CRC upregulated COX-2 through MEK signaling, which inhibited CD8+ T cells infiltration and promoted tumor growth, together led to immunotherapy resistance. COX-2 or MEK inhibition may relieve therapy resistance and promote therapy efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for treating dMMR CRC with PIK3CA overexpression or activating mutation.

Neoadjuvant anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapy in patients (pts) with resectable mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): EPOC2201.

TPS226 Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by surgical resection is a standard treatment for LARC. As anti-PD-1 therapy for patients with dMMR colorectal cancer is responsive in the context of metastatic disease, several clinical trials which evaluate the efficacies of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with dMMR LARC are on-going and suggested the outstanding responses (Cercek A. et al., N Engl J Med 2022). Methods: We initiated the EPOC 2201 VOLTAGE-2 study, which is an ongoing, non-randomized, single-arm phase II trial. The major eligibility criteria were as follows: treatment-naïve with rectal cancer located 12 cm from the anal verge; confirmed dMMR; clinical stage II/III in primary cohort (N=35) and stage I in exploratory cohort (N=20); age ≥ 18; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1; and presence of sufficient organ function. The study treatments include 12 cycles of nivolumab (NIVO) monotherapy (240 mg every 2 weeks) followed by assessment using Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSKCC) Regression Schema (Smith J.J. et al., BMC Cancer 2015). If clinical complete response (cCR) or near complete response (nCR) are observed, non-operative management with additional 12 cycles of NIVO will be performed. If incomplete response (IR) is observed, standard chemoradiotherapy with 50.4Gy of radiation plus capecitabine followed by surgery will be performed. The primary endpoint is the 2-year cCR rate in primary cohort. Various survival endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are assessed as secondary endpoints. Safety analyses are performed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver. 5.0, and the Clavien‒Dindo classification (ver. 2.0) is added for postoperative complications. Assuming null and alternative hypotheses, cCR rates of 23% and 45%, the planned sample size for primary cohort was set at 35, with a one-sided alpha of 5% and power of 80%. An exploratory biomarker study was also conducted using serially collected tumor and blood samples. Whole genome-based minimal residual disease (MRD) assay and whole exome/whole transcriptome-based tumor and immune microenvironment analyses are performed. As of August 2023, patient’s enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: jRCT2031220484 .

Short course immunotherapy as curative-intent treatment in stage I-III dMMR rectal cancer.

121 Background: Neoadjuvant chemo-radiation followed by resection is standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (RC). A subset of RC are mismatch repair deficient (dMMR). Check-point inhibitors (CPI) are the standard of care in dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) in the metastatic setting, and recent trials have demonstrated impressive efficacy in early CRC, even with a limited number of cycles. In the NICHE-II trial (Chalabi et al, ESMO 2022) 72 of 107 patients (67%) with colon cancer obtained pathological complete response (pCR) after short course CPI. In patients with RC, Cercek et al (NEJM 2022) showed that 12 patients (100%) obtained pCR after 6 months of dostarlimab. The efficacy of CPI in dMMR RC has only been evaluated in few studies. Here we report data from a Danish trial with early dMMR RC. EU CT number 2022-500646-14-00. Methods: The purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 1 cycle of nivolumab (3 mg/kg days 1 and 15 - nivo) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg day 1 - ipi) in patients with early stage dMMR RC. The primary endpoint was number of patients with clinical complete response (cCR - no visible or palpable tumor) evaluated 4 weeks after nivo-ipi. Patients achieving a clinical, radiological, pathological (representative biopsy without viable tumor cells), and molecular complete response was offered a thorough watchful waiting strategy without surgery. Results: 5 patients were treated, 4 patients received a single cycle of nivo-ipi and 1 patient received 2 cycles of nivo-ipi, as the tumor was still visible at the first endoscopy (Table). All 5 patients were evaluated 4 weeks after completing nivo-ipi and all 5 patients (100%) achieved cCR. All 5 patients were ctDNA positive (Jensen et al, Clin Chem 2020) at diagnosis, 4 patients turned negative after therapy (1 pending). No patient needed radiotherapy and all patients agreed to non-surgical watchful waiting. No patient has had progression or recurrence (1-42 months follow-up). Conclusions: Short-course nivo-ipi is very effective in locally advanced dMMR rectal cancer and may become an alternative to resection. Clinical trial information: 2022-500646-14-00 . [Table: see text]