"God's in This Apple": Eating and Spirituality in Churchill's Light Shining in Buckinghamshire Stephanie Pocock (bio) For authors influenced by feminist studies of the divided consciousness and its manifestation in eating disorders, the ways in which characters choose to interact with food has assumed vital importance. Their writings are often haunted by the presence or tangible absence of food, with its undertones of mixed longing and loathing. The rhythms of eating and not eating, feasting and fasting, fulfilment and renunciation, have become for many critics symbols of the internalization of patriarchy by women. Few writers, however, have treated the symbolic act of eating with as much complexity as Caryl Churchill. Her characters, both male and female, often eat onstage, and when hungry, discuss eating and food at great length. While recognizing the particular importance of food to women, Churchill's plays resist treating feasting or fasting as specifically gendered activities. Instead, her characters' experiences of eating or starving are richly layered with social, political and spiritual significance. In her 1976 play Light Shining in Buckinghamshire, Churchill's careful portrayal of her characters' literal need for nourishment poignantly reveals the economic disparity that allows some to feast while others hunger. Yet the importance of eating and starving within the play transcends the political realm, deriving spiritual significance from the characters' attention to the Christian rituals of fasting and the Eucharist. Churchill's plays suggest that both hunger and gluttony are of political and social origin, that the growing, preparing, and consumption of food make far-reaching political statements. By considering the similarities between hunger caused by economic deprivation and that caused by female socialization, her plays emphasize the inseparability of capitalism and patriarchy. Those whom a hierarchical society values, it feeds well. Of necessity, such a system relies on maintaining a majority that consumes less without significant rebellion. Whether this majority is [End Page 60] forced into hunger through economic want or is socialized into self-starvation is of little consequence to those at the top. Thus feminism and capitalism, in Churchill's understanding, find themselves irreconcilably at odds. In an interview, the playwright said, "Of course, socialism and feminism aren't synonymous, but I feel strongly about both and wouldn't be interested in a form of one that didn't include the other" (qtd. in "Caryl Churchill" 78). Woven into Churchill's food symbolism along with her signature feminist and socialist statements are the language and traditions of Christian spirituality. In such diverse plays as Vinegar Tom (1976), Fen (1983), The Skriker (1994), and Blue Heart (1997), religious traditions clearly influence the characters' attitudes towards eating. It is in her treatment of the English Civil War, Light Shining in Buckinghamshire, however, that Churchill most fully explores the act of eating as an insistent symbol of the paradoxical messages of the Christian tradition. For the play's characters, the act of eating in a religious context functions both as a form of self-realization and an extreme form of self-denial or even loss of self. Through experiences of poverty, starvation, and fasting, they cultivate a spirituality based on the acceptance of suffering as mortification of the flesh. Simultaneously, through the Eucharist and acts of charity, they realize a mystical union of body and soul, a feeding of the body that leads to fulfilment of the spirit. Food thus becomes a discordant symbol, serving as both a means of communion with God and the ecclesiastical body, and as a base necessity, a means to please the ever-lusting flesh. Although the rituals of Christian spirituality play a significant role in Churchill's canon, critics have tended to focus instead on the influences of Buddhism on her work. In an interview with Judith Thurman, Churchill mentions that, while studying at Oxford, she was "strongly influenced by Buddhism, and that sort of thing," and that, as a playwright, she finds herself "constantly coming back" to "Eastern" thought (54). Mark Thacker Brown has explored the ramifications of this rather nebulous statement, discussing Churchill's tendency to oppose western thought, focused on individuality and ownership, to "Eastern," centred on harmony and contentedness. These two modes of thought interact in a yin/yang...
Read full abstract