Distal Triceps Research Articles

ASSESSMENT OF A NOVEL DYNAMIC HIGH-STRENGTH SUTURE TAPE IN DISTAL TRICEPS TENDON REPAIR: A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY

IntroductionDistal triceps tendon rupture is related to high complication rates with up to 25% failures. Elbow stiffness is another severe complication, as the traditional approach considers prolonged immobilization to ensure tendon healing. Recently a dynamic high-strength suture tape was designed, implementing a silicone-infused core for braid shortening and preventing repair elongation during mobilization, thus maintaining constant tissue approximation. The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare the novel dynamic tape versus a conventional high-strength suture tape in a human cadaveric distal triceps tendon rupture repair model.MethodSixteen paired arms from eight donors were used. Distal triceps tendon rupture tenotomies and repairs were performed via the crossed transosseous locking Krackow stitch technique for anatomic footprint repair using either conventional suture tape (ST) or novel dynamic tape (DT). A postoperative protocol mimicking intense early rehabilitation was simulated, by a 9-day, 300-cycle daily mobilization under 120N pulling force followed by a final destructive test.ResultSignificant differences were identified between the groups regarding the temporal progression of the displacement in the distal, intermediate, and proximal tendon aspects, p<0.001. DT demonstrated significantly less displacement compared to ST (4.6±1.2mm versus 7.8±2.1mm) and higher load to failure (637±113N versus 341±230N), p≤0.037. DT retracted 0.95±1.95mm after each 24-hour rest period and withstood the whole cyclic loading sequence without failure. In contrast, ST failed early in three specimens.ConclusionFrom a biomechanical perspective, DT revealed lower tendon displacement and greater resistance in load to failure over ST during simulated daily mobilization, suggesting its potential for earlier elbow mobilization and prevention of postoperative elbow stiffness.

Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sport Criteria After Distal Triceps Rupture Repair: A Scoping Review.

Distal triceps rupture is a rare injury that is commonly surgically repaired to improve elbow strength and function. Most patients are active and have goals to return to specific activities and sports. There is no gold standard rehabilitation protocol for return to sport (RTS) after distal triceps repair. To identify in the literature any criteria used for RTS after distal triceps repair. Scoping review; Level of evidence, 4. Under PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, level 1 to 4 studies that examined distal triceps repair and had a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months were deemed eligible for study inclusion. Exclusion criteria encompassed studies that employed nonoperative treatment, lacked specific RTS criteria, or involved revision cases. The selected studies underwent assessment regarding RTS outcomes, timelines, rates, and methodological quality. Of the initial 378 unique studies, 6 studies (including 116 patients involved in 16 different sports) met the inclusion criteria. Four of the studies reported RTS rates, with a mean of 89.3%. The duration of time for returning to sport was reported in 2 studies and varied from 4 to 6 months. The parameters most emphasized in the rehabilitation protocols were progressive range of motion exercises, followed by early immobilization and progressive strengthening exercises. Supervised therapy was reported in only 2 (33%) studies. Although all studies included a rehabilitation protocol and 5 studies included a timeline for RTS, only 1 study provided subjective criteria, and no studies utilized specific objective measurement criteria. The overall study quality was fair. This review demonstrated that the overall RTS rate after distal triceps repair was high (89.3%), with no consensus on RTS criteria. Most studies included initial immobilization followed by progressive range of motion and strengthening. Timing after surgery was used as a measure to RTS in the minority of studies and varied between 4 and 6 months. Further research is needed to develop functional and performance-based metrics to better standardize RTS criteria and rehabilitation protocols.

Bilateral triceps rupture: a review of the literature and case series

Introduction Distal triceps tendon injuries are the least common of tendon injuries, comprising 1% all cases. This injury is more common in active men, between 30-50 years old. Risk factors include anabolic steroid use, local steroid injections and hyperparathyroidism. The principal mechanism of injury is an eccentric load applied to a contracting triceps. This injury is often misdiagnosed and thus far, bilateral injury has not been reported. Methods Retrospective description of two patients diagnosed with bilateral distal triceps injury with different presentations, treated surgically at a surgical center in the USA. Electronic records were reviewed for patient demographics, rehabilitation and clinical outcomes. Discussion The triceps tendon may be weakened by stem cell or corticoid injections or may cause tendinosis. Early diagnosis and surgical repair with a Krackow-type suture configuration in the triceps and parallel bone tunneling is a safe technique with a secure repair. Graded rehabilitation can offer patients good outcomes for range of motion and strength. Clinicians can explain that patients can expect to return to sport and activity. Conclusion Triceps tendon rupture is a rare, significant injury that requires a secure surgical repair with bone tunnelling. Our experience careful post-operative rehabilitation with gradual motion and strengthening is the key for successful recovery.

Distal Triceps Tendon Repair in Strength Athletes Leads to Satisfactory Return to Sports: A Retrospective Analysis of 22 Cases.

Background: Distal triceps brachii tendon rupture (DTTR) is a relatively rare injury that is common in bodybuilding and high-intensity contact sports and can lead to significant functional impairment of the elbow joint. This study was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sports among competitive bodybuilders and high-demand strength athletes after surgical repair of DTTR. Methods: This retrospective case series was performed in an institutional setting in tertiary health care. Return to sports of 22 competing or high-demand strength athletes (meaning three or more exercises per week) were analyzed pre- and postoperatively after surgical repair of DTTR using a hybrid technique of transosseous sutures and anchor fixation. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic variables, and independent and paired t-tests were used to assess clinical outcomes. Results: The follow-up showed that from pre- to postoperatively, there was no deterioration in the number of sports disciplines (2.4 and 2.5 sporting activities per person, respectively; p = 0.540) or in the frequency of weekly training (4.1 and 4.1 times per person, respectively; p = 0.329). The postoperative visual analog scale for pain (from 6.0 to 1.6, p < 0.001), level of fitness (from 5.1 to 2.6, p = 0.002), and ability to train (from 5.2 to 1.3, p < 0.001) improved significantly. The time of return to sports was 1.5-3 months and 4-6 months after the surgery for ten patients each. The overall rate of return to sports was 95%, whereas 86% returned to the preinjury level of sporting activity. Conclusions: Repair of DTTR leads to high rates of return to sports in competitive athletes.

A comparison of distal triceps tendon repair outcomes by surgical technique

Distal triceps tendon ruptures are an uncommon injury with several reported repair techniques. Outcomes research between the repair techniques is complicated by the rarity of the injury as most published materials are based on small sample sizes and specific surgical techniques. This study compared surgical complications, reoperations, and range of motion between all suture transosseous tunnel only (TT), suture anchor only (SA), and transosseous tunnel plus suture anchor (TTSA) repair techniques. We retrospectively identified patients who underwent a distal triceps repair at our tertiary-care institution from 2011 to 2021. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient demographics, triceps rupture characteristics, repair technique, and postoperative complications. This study includes 199 patients who underwent a repair by TT (82), SA (69), or TTSA (48) techniques. No differences were identified between groups with regards to demographics and medical comorbidities. Patients treated by SA technique were more likely to have a loss of elbow extension (SA: 14 [26.4%], TT: 6 [8.57%], TTSA: 4 [10.0%], P= .014) postoperatively with an average loss of 9° for the patients in all groups. However, no differences were identified between the groups with regards to postoperative complications (TT: 15.9%, SA: 17.4%, TTSA: 18.8%, P= .911), including triceps rerupture (TT: 6.10%, SA: 4.35%, TTSA: 12.5%, P= .260), and reoperation (TT: 11.0%, SA: 11.6%, TTSA: 14.6%, P= .822) rates. Regardless of repair technique, distal triceps tendon repair surgery has a relatively high complication and reoperation rate. However, given the similarities between the various methods of repair, surgeons can be confident in repairing this type of injury by whichever modality they deem appropriate.

Olecranon Osteotomy Exposure for Distal Humeral Fracture Treatment.

Olecranon osteotomy (OO) is commonly utilized to improve exposure when treating intra-articular distal humeral fractures. A chevron-shaped osteotomy facilitates reduction and increases surface area for healing1. Following distal humeral fracture reduction and fixation, the OO fragment is fixed with a precontoured plate. The OO technique yields comparable outcomes to alternative techniques1,2. The technique is performed as follows. (1) Imaging is reviewed and preoperative planning is performed. (2) The patient is positioned in the lateral decubitus position with the operative extremity placed over a bolster. (3) A longitudinal posterior skin incision is centered just medial or lateral to the tip of the olecranon. Full-thickness skin flaps are raised medially and laterally. (4) The ulnar nerve is identified and mobilized for later anterior subcutaneous transposition. (5) An OO is performed at the non-articular "bare area" of the trochlear notch with an oscillating saw and completed with an osteotome. (6) Open reduction and internal fixation of the distal humerus is performed. (7) The osteotomy fragment is reduced, and a precontoured plate is applied. (8) A small longitudinal slit in the distal triceps over the proximal edge of the plate decreases plate prominence and is repaired with suture. (9) The subcutaneous tissues and skin are closed in the usual manner. Alterative techniques include extra-articular OO, triceps splitting, triceps reflecting, and lateral para-olecranon combined with a medial approach. Multiple drill holes and a thin osteotome can help mitigate the kerf created by the oscillating saw. Alternative fixation methods include a predrilled 6.5-mm intramedullary screw, a tension band construct, suture fixation, or a one-third tubular plate. The OO technique provides improved exposure when compared with alternative techniques, enabling accurate reduction and fixation of distal humeral fractures1-3. Wilkinson and Stanley found that OO exposed the distal humeral articular surface to a greater degree than the triceps-splitting and triceps-reflecting approaches3. OO has not been associated with triceps weakness, unlike some of the alternative techniques2. The incidence of good-to-excellent outcomes is similar when comparing the techniques for exposure of intra-articular distal humeral fractures4. Osteotomies united in all patients in 2 reported series, totaling 84 cases1,2. Removal of symptomatic hardware used in OO fragment fixation can occur in a small subset of patients1,2. Provisionally size a precontoured plate and fix it on the olecranon to aid in later reduction and fracture fixation.The bare area is the desired position for the OO because of its natural lack of cartilage5,6. This non-articular bare area is located just distal to the deepest portion of the trochlear notch, approximately 2 to 2.5 cm distal to the olecranon tip5,6.An (apex-distal) chevron osteotomy angle of ∼130° will help to keep the osteotomy within the non-articular bare area6.Beginning on the dorsal surface of the ulna, directly posterior to the bare area, an oscillating saw is utilized to create a chevron osteotomy to subchondral bone, perpendicular to the long axis of the ulna5,6.The OO is completed by fracturing through the osteochondral surface, which leaves an irregular chondral cancellous surface that can accurately interdigitate. This facilitates later reduction and stability of the osteotomy.Anatomic articular reduction of the OO is not solely judged on the dorsal cortical bone because of the kerf removed by the saw blade. Instead, examination of the articular surface of the trochlear notch is the primary assessment of reduction.Placement of suture through the proximal portion of the plate aids in the repair of the longitudinal split of the distal triceps.Successful treatment of distal humeral fractures requires accurate reduction and rigid fixation aided by adequate exposure achieved through OO. ORIF = open reduction and internal fixationOT = occupational therapyHWR = hardware removalK-wire = Kirschner wireROM = range of motion.

SpeedBridge Technique for Open Distal Triceps Tendon Repair

Background: Distal triceps tendon ruptures occur most commonly in middle-aged males, with possible rupture locations including the musculotendinous junction, mid-tendon, or most commonly, at the tendinous insertion. This surgical technique video demonstrates a hybrid distal triceps tendon repair construct utilizing transosseous sutures, SpeedBridge compression, and knotless suture anchor fixation. Indications: Indications for this procedure include an acute injury with complete avulsion of the distal triceps tendon from the olecranon and extension weakness. The goals of surgical repair include restoration of the tendon footprint on the olecranon and the creation of a strong fixation construct that balances tension to optimize healing and restore functional range of motion. Technique Description: The proximal avulsed tendon is prepared with two number 2 suture tapes placed in a locking Krackow fashion. The locking stitch exit point is determined at a distance proximal to the distal end of the tendon to optimize tension after the reduction of the tendon to the footprint. Two looped sutures are then passed through the tendon at the same exit level as the locking stitch, 1 on the medial and lateral sides of the locking stitch, respectively. Two transosseous tunnels are drilled obliquely, from proximal to distal, through the olecranon. A 4.75-mm suture anchor is then drilled and tapped in the proximal ulna, in between 2 transosseous tunnel exit points, for lateral placement. The medial and lateral locked stitches are passed through the medial and lateral transosseous tunnels, respectively. The SpeedBridge construct is formed by passing one suture from each locking stitch limb back through the tendon using the previously placed looped sutures as shuttling devices. After appropriate tensioning, the sutures are secured into the previously drilled 4.75-mm suture anchor in a specific fashion. Results: Current literature suggests that the SpeedBridge technique for triceps tendon repair demonstrates good functional and clinical outcomes with high satisfaction rates, elbow functional scores, and rates of returning to work/activity, coupled with low complication rates. Conclusion: The hybrid SpeedBridge construct is an effective technique for acute distal triceps tendon repair. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Distal Triceps Tendon Complete Rupture in A Professional Athlete: A Case Report and Review of The Literature

Distal Triceps Tendon Complete Rupture in A Professional Athlete: A Case Report and Review of The Literature

Partial ruptures of the distal triceps tendons show only slightly lower ultimate load to failure: a biomechanical study

ObjectivePartial ruptures of the distal triceps tendon are usually treated surgically from a size of > 50% tendon involvement. The aim of this study was to compare the ultimate load to failure of intact triceps tendons with partially ruptured tendons and describe the rupture mechanism.MethodsEighteen human fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were randomly assigned to two groups with either an intact distal triceps tendon or with a simulated partial rupture of 50% of the tendon. A continuous traction on the distal triceps tendon was applied to provoke a complete tendon rupture. The maximum required ultimate load to failure of the tendon in N was measured. In addition, video recordings of the ruptures of the intact tendons were performed and analysed by two independent investigators.ResultsA median ultimate load to failure of 1,390 N (range Q0.25—Q0.75, 954 – 2,360) was measured in intact distal triceps tendons. The median ultimate load to failure of the partially ruptured tendons was 1,330 N (range Q0.25—Q0.75, 1,130 – 1.470 N). The differences were not significant. All recorded ruptures began in the superficial tendon portion, and seven out of nine tendons in the lateral tendon portion.DiscussionPartial ruptures of the distal triceps tendon demonstrate a not statistically significant lower ultimate load to failure than intact tendons and typically occur in the superficial, lateral portion of the tendon. This finding can be helpful when deciding between surgical and conservative therapy for partial ruptures of the distal triceps tendon.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

The role of the lateral part of the distal triceps and the anconeus in varus stability of the elbow: A biomechanical study: The role of the lateral triceps tendon and anconeus under gravity varus.

The role of the lateral part of the distal triceps as a stabilizer in the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow and whether its effect in improving the stability is independent of that of the anconeus is unclear. Seven cadaveric elbows were tested under gravity varus stress using a custom-made machine designed to simulate muscle loads while allowing passive flexion of the elbow. An injury model was created by sectioning the LCL and sparing the common extensor origin. The lateral part of the distal triceps tendon was loaded sequentially with 0 N, 10 N, 25 N and 40 N. Each stage of the lateral part of the distal triceps loading was tested with the anconeus unloaded (inactive) or with a 25 N load applied (active). Articular contact pressure on the coronoid, the medial facet, and the lateral facet were collected and processed using TekScan sensors and software. A significant decrease in the mean coronoid contact pressure was seen with sequential loading of the lateral part of the distal triceps (p < 0.001). The ratio of medial to lateral facet contact pressures (M/L ratio) significantly decreased with sequential loading of the lateral part of the distal triceps (p < 0.001), indicating a better distribution of the contact pressure between the medial and lateral facets as the lateral part of the distal triceps was loaded. These effects were statistically significant, both with and without anconeus loading. There was no significant modification of the effect of the lateral part of the distal triceps loading on the contact pressure by the anconeus loading (p = 0.47). However, with active anconeus loading, the contact pressure and the M/L ratio were significantly lower for any stage of lateral triceps loading (p < 0.001), indicating a synergistic effect of the anconeus. In an LCL-deficient elbow, the lateral part of the distal triceps loading prevents the increased contact pressure on the coronoid under varus stress and improves the distribution of contact pressures on the coronoid. Anconeus loading further decreases and improves the distribution of the contact pressures; however, its effect is independent of that of the lateral part of the distal triceps. These results substantiate a role of the lateral part of the distal triceps as a dynamic constraint against elbow varus and have clinical implications for prevention and rehabilitation of elbow instability.

Trends and complications of distal biceps tendon repair among American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery part II oral examination candidates

Surgical fixation of distal biceps tendon ruptures can restore supination strength and minimize biceps fatigue, resulting in high patient satisfaction rates. Surgical approaches can vary (single incision vs. double incision), and the number of fixation techniques has increased in recent years. The reported rate of postoperative complications after surgical repair of distal biceps tendon injuries is high, ranging from 15% to 35%. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends and postoperative complication profile among newly trained surgeons who performed distal biceps tendon repairs utilizing the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was retrospectively queried for patients treated with distal biceps tendon repair by part II examination candidates between 2017 and 2020. Distal biceps tendon repairs were isolated using the Current Procedural Terminology code 24,342. Distal triceps tendon injuries were excluded with International Classification of Diseases code S46.3∗∗. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, and surgeon fellowship training were collected. Surgeon-reported postoperative 90-day complications, including general anesthetic, medical, and surgical complications, rates of readmission, and rates of reoperation were recorded. Comparisons of rates among patient groups organized by surgeon fellowship training were performed using the chi-squared test. A total of 2089 distal biceps tendon repairs were included in the analysis. The average patient age was 47.5yr, and 97.3% of patients were men. The majority of cases was performed by surgeons with fellowship training in sports medicine, hand/upper extremity, and shoulder and elbow, with 867 (41.5%) cases performed by sports medicine-trained surgeons, 740 (35.4%) by hand/upper extremity-trained surgeons, and 313 (15.0%) by shoulder and elbow-trained surgeons. In total, 608 (29.1%) patients experienced an anesthetic (0.2%), medical (1.1%), or surgical (28.2%) complication. The most common surgical complications were nerve injury (20.6%), failure of tendon repair or fixation (2.4%), and infection (1.7%). The overall reoperation rate was 2.4%. There were no significant differences in complication or reoperation rates among subspecialty training received. Among newly trained surgeons, those with fellowship training in sports medicine, hand/upper extremity, and shoulder and elbow performed the most distal biceps tendon repairs, and there was no difference in complication rates among subspecialty training received. Complication rates after distal biceps tendon repair performed by newly trained surgeons were similar to those previously reported in large cohort studies, with nerve injury as the most common complication.

Surgical treatment of distal triceps tendon ruptures

Restoration of the anatomy and the original length of the muscle-tendon unit in triceps tendon ruptures. Acute and chronic triceps tendon ruptures with persisting symptoms and significant strength deficits. Infections and tumors in the surgical area. Prone position. Skin incision over the distal triceps in alateral direction around the olecranon. Mobilization of the tendon and débridement of the olecranon. Drilling of 2 × 2.9 mm suture anchor holes medial and lateral into the footprint of the olecranon. In addition, drilling through the olecranon 12 mm distal to the tip of the olecranon and transosseous introduction of 4sutures. Then the suture anchors (all-suture or titanium anchors) are inserted into the drill holes. Refix the deep and superficial tendons with the anchor threads. Refix the upper tendon portions with the transosseous sutures. In the case of chronic lesions, agraft interposition is necessary. Dorsal 10 ° splint, then change to an orthosis fixed in 20 ° extension and passive mobility 0-30 ° flexion for 6weeks. From the 7th week onwards, load-free, physiotherapeutically controlled increasing mobilization. Starting weight-loading from the 13th week on. Full load after 6months. In all, 34male strength athletes with acute triceps tendon rupture underwent surgery using the hybrid technique described and were prospectively recorded. The MEPS‑G score averaged 94.7points, there were no permanent limitations in mobility, and the postoperative strength ability averaged 94% of the original strength performance ability. The return to sport achieved 100%. The complication rate was 20.6%. Reconstruction of the distal triceps tendon using hybrid technology leads to very good functional results. Half of all patients complained of symptoms even before the rupture, which suggests previous damage to the distal triceps tendon caused by degeneration.

The anatomic - magnetic resonance imaging study of distal triceps brachii tendon.

The study aimed to describe the distal triceps brachii insertion on the olecranon and to correlate the findings with those seen in normal MR (Magnetic Resonance) anatomy of the triceps brachii insertion. 14 un-paired fresh frozen elbows were included according to the institution guidelines and dissected. Histologic examination was performed to the distal triceps brachii insertion. The dimension of the distal triceps brachii tendon insertion was measured and defined based on its layer. The measurement of distal triceps brachii insertion was performed with image processing program (Image J, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland). T1-weighted elbow MR images (3.0T) of a 102 patients were acquired and analyzed according to its sagittal plane. All specimens shows that distal triceps brachii tendon is with three distinct insertional areas in the olecranon which are: (1) capsular, (2) deep muscular, (3) superficial tendinous insertion with the areas of 80.7mm2, 56.4mm2, and 175.2mm2, respectively. The superficial tendinous insertion was observed with a thickened portion, the "central cord" with 0.5 occupation ratio. MR analysis showed that 30% (31/102) of the distal biceps brachii insertion was with a cleft between the bipartite insertion of the superficial tendinous and the deep muscular insertion on olecranon which designated as the "lacuna" which was also found in 35% (5/14) of the specimens. The distal triceps brachii has three distinct insertion on the olecranon. The superficial tendinous layer was separated with the deep muscular layer by a cleft in one third of the cases. Knowledge of this anatomy will help surgeon to understand the partial triceps injury and to avoid iatrogenic injury to the distal triceps tendon during surgery.

Distal Triceps Rupture with an Injury of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament: a Result of a Fall Onto an Outstretched Arm - a Case Series.

Traumatic triceps tendon ruptures are rare and known to result in substantial disability unless appropriate surgical treatment is performed. A traumatic rupture can occur due to a fall onto the outstretched hand. Tearing of the triceps tendon results in a valgus load onto the elbow, which can lead to injuries to the radial head/neck and/or the ulnar collateral ligament. Hence, attention must be paid to associated pathologies after diagnosis of rupture to the distal triceps tendon. Our surgical procedure in these cases includes diagnostic arthroscopy to detect concomitant injuries. In the following, we present three cases where we performed an open suture bridge repair of the triceps tendon followed by suture repair of the ulnar collateral ligament. All patients recovered well and reported no elbow pain or limited range of motion. The ASES and Mayo Elbow Performance scores were 100 at the 1-year follow-up.

Complications after traumatic distal triceps tears: an analysis of 107 cases

The major complication and reoperation rates after distal triceps repair are poorly defined. The purpose of this large retrospective cohort study of distal triceps repairs performed by multiple surgeons within a large orthopedic group was to more clearly define the rates and risk factors of clinically impactful major complications and reoperations. All distal triceps tendon repairs for traumatic injuries performed from January 2006 to April 2017 with a minimum 2-month follow-up were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology code 24342. A total of 107 patients were included in this study. The primary outcome measure was total major complication rate. Reoperations, minor complications, and risk factors were also tracked. Repairs were performed via bone tunnels (63.5%), suture anchors (13%), or a combination of the two (17.8%). A 14% complication rate and 13.1% reoperation rate were observed. Indication for reoperation included 9 reruptures, 3 infections, and 2 others. The time between injury and surgery was not found to be a risk factor for tendon rerupture. Smoking status, gender, utilization of a splint or controlled motion brace, and time to first active mobilization were not shown to influence rates or rerupture. Distal triceps repair for traumatic injuries is associated with 14% complication and 13.1% reoperation rates. Patient, rehabilitation, and surgeon-specific factors did not influence the complication rate.

Surgical Outcomes, Trends, and Risk Factors of Distal Triceps Repairs.

Distal triceps ruptures are rare, and complete ruptures are commonly treated with surgery. Studies of patients in small cohorts with distal triceps tear have reported outcomes and risk factors; however, large-scale data are scant. This study seeks to determine current trends, outcomes, and risk factors of distal triceps tears. Within a large insurance claims database, distal triceps repair patients were identified through Current Procedural Terminology coding with concomitant distal triceps International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision/10th Revision diagnosis codes and 1-year active status before and after surgery. Demographics, total costs, 90-day complications, and revision rates within 1 year of index surgery were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed for revision and complication rates using sex, age, and comorbidities (anabolic steroid use, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, tobacco use, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic kidney disease). A total of 8143 patients were included in the cohort. Male patients and patients aged 40 to 59 years comprised most of the study population. The postoperative complication rate was 5.8%, and the 1-year revision rate was 2.6%. Male sex, age >60 years, ischemic heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic kidney disease were statistically significant risk factors for higher 90-day complication rates. Anabolic steroid use significantly increased the risk of surgical revision. Distal triceps repairs in this large cohort study occur most frequently in men aged 40 to 59 years. Complications are generally low, with age >60 years, male sex, ischemic heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic kidney disease as risk factors for 90-day complications and prior anabolic steroid use as a risk factor for 1-year revision surgery. This information can help to improve education and expectations of this procedure.

"Safe dissection parameters of the anconeus rotational flap for soft tissue coverage at the elbow".

The anconeus is a small muscle located on the posterior elbow originating on the lateral epicondyle and inserting onto the proximal-lateral ulna that functions as an elbow extensor as well as dynamic stabilizer. The blood supply is tri-fold: medial/middle collateral artery (MCA), recurrent posterior interosseous artery (RPIA), and less commonly found, the posterior branch of the radial collateral artery. The anconeus has become a popular option for local soft tissue coverage about the elbow (distal triceps, olecranon, proximal forearm). The average defect size for consideration of local anconeus flap coverage is 5-7cm2. The aim of the study was to determine safe dissection parameters of the anconeus as well as map arterial pedicles to achieve successful local harvest of the muscle without devascularization. 8 fresh frozen cadaveric arms (all male, average age 63 years - 4 left arms, 4 right arms) from scapula to fingertip were obtained. First, the radial, ulnar and axillary arteries were dissected and isolated. The radial and ulnar arteries were transected. 100cc normal saline was injected through the axillary artery, sequentially clamping the radial followed by the ulnar artery so that adequate flow could be seen through all vessels. 100cc mixture of Biodür and hardener (10:1) was mixed and injected into the axillary artery. We first allowed free flow through both the ulnar and radial vessels followed by clamping of these vessels. This allowed the pressure to build up and fill the smaller vessels in the arms. After injection, the axillary artery was then clamped and the specimens were left to harden for 24-48 h. After hardening, dissection was performed by making a curvilinear incision centred over the lateral epicondyle. The anconeus was identified and the interval between the anconeus and ECU was then confirmed. Measurements of the anconeus muscle were taken. Blunt dissection was carried between anconeus and ECU until the RPIA was identified and protected. We isolated the MCA by dissecting proximally. This was found to run with the nerve to the anconeus. Once this vessel had been protected, the muscle reflected from distal to proximal staying along its ulnar border. The branches of the RPIA were ligated and the dissection was continued proximally. Measurements of the distances of the RPIA, MCA were taken. The average distance of olecranon to muscle tip was 95.0mm. The average distance of lateral epicondyle (LE) to muscle tip was 90.8mm. The average distance of LE to olecranon was 49.8mm. The average location of the RPIA was 63.mm when measuring LE to vessel, 68.3mm when measuring olecranon to vessel, 18.3mm when measuring RPIA to muscle tip. The average RPIA diameter was 1.1mm and length was 36.4mm from the initial branching of the posterior interosseous artery. The average MCA diameter was 0.7mm. The posterior branch of the radial collateral artery was only found in 3/8 specimens. The RPIA and MCA were constant in all specimens. Dissection was safely carried to the border of the LE and olecranon without disruption of the MCA. Our conclusions determined that if dissection of the anconeus is undertaken, the RPIA remains constant between the interval of the ECU as well as anconeus at an average distance of 18.3mm from the tip of the muscle measuring proximally; moreover, the MCA was constant in all specimens found directly between the LE and olecranon always running with the nerve to the anconeus. When dissecting and mobilizing to ensure preservation of the MCA, dissection should be taken from distal to proximal as well as dissecting along the ulnar border of the anconeus. Proximal dissection can be taken as proximal as the border of the LE and olecranon as that did not disrupt MCA blood supply.

Anatomic evaluation of the triceps tendon insertion at the proximal olecranon regarding placement of fracture fixation devices

PurposeOlecranon fractures, especially with a small proximal fragment, remain a surgical challenge. Soft tissue irritation and affection of the triceps muscle bear a risk of complications. In order to find an area for a soft-tissue sparing placement of implants in the treatment of olecranon fractures, we aimed to define and measure the segments of the proximal olecranon and evaluate them regarding possible plate placement.MethodsWe investigated 82 elbow joints. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee, After positioning in an arm holder and a posterior approach we described the morphology of the triceps footprint, evaluated and measured the surface area of the triceps and posterior capsule and correlated the results to easily measurable anatomical landmarks.ResultsWe found a bipartite insertional footprint with a superficial tendinous triceps insertion of 218.2 mm2 (± 41.2, range 124.7–343.2), a capsular insertion of 159.3 mm2 (± 30.2, range 99.0–232.1) and a deep, muscular triceps insertion area of 138.1 mm2 (± 30.2, range 79.9–227.5). Olecranon height was 26.7 mm (± 2.3, range 20.5–32.2), and olecranon width was 25.3 mm (± 2.4, range 20.9–30.4). Average correlation between the size of the deep insertion and ulnar (r = 0.314) and radial length (r = 0.298) was obtained.ConclusionsWe demonstrated the bipartite morphology of the distal triceps footprint and that the deep muscular triceps insertion area by its measured size could be a possible site for the placement of fracture fixations devices. The size correlates with ulnar and radial length.

Mass effect of the distal triceps brachii muscle on ulnar nerve movement during elbow flexion.

Hypertrophic triceps brachii contributes to ulnar nerve movement, but the location of the mass effect of the triceps brachii muscle is not known. In this study we aimed to determine the mass effect of the distal medial head of the triceps brachii (DMTB) muscle on ulnar nerve movement. In 48 arms, movement of the ulnar nerve at the medial epicondyle and muscle thickness (medial and long head of the triceps brachii [MLTB], medial head of the triceps brachii [MTB], DMTB, and biceps brachii [BB]) were measured using ultrasonography. Ulnar nerve movement at the elbow was consistently correlated with the DMTB muscle thickness (horizontal ulnar nerve movement at the elbow [HM] / vertical ulnar nerve movement at the elbow [VM] with 90° elbow flexion: r=0.668 / r=0.313, HM/VM with full elbow flexion: r=0.481 / r=0.391). With multiple linear regression, the DMTB was the most important muscle with regard to contribution of thickness to ulnar nerve movement. Individuals with partial and complete dislocation showed a thicker DMTB than those without dislocation. Our data suggest that the mass effect of the triceps brachii muscle is exerted primarily by its distal portion. When ulnar nerve dislocation is observed, thickness and anatomical variation of DMTB in the retrocondylar area during elbow flexion should be assessed.