Distal Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Research Articles

Standard versus distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI 50-60 kg/m2: 5-year outcomes of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

BackgroundThe optimal surgical weight loss procedure for patients with a BMI of 50 kg/m2 or more is uncertain. This study compared distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with standard RYGB.MethodsIn this double-blind RCT, patients aged 18–60 years with a BMI of 50–60 kg/m2 were allocated randomly to receive standard (150 cm alimentary, 50 cm biliopancreatic limb) or distal (150 cm common channel, 50 cm biliopancreatic limb) RYGB. The primary outcome (change in BMI at 2 years) has been reported previously. Secondary outcomes 5 years after surgery, such as weight loss, health-related quality of life, and nutritional outcomes are reported.ResultsBetween May 2011 and April 2013, 123 patients were randomized, 113 received an intervention, and 92 attended 5-year follow-up. Mean age was 40 (95 per cent c.i. 38 to 41) years and 73 patients (65 per cent) were women; 57 underwent standard RYGB and 56 distal RYGB. BMI was reduced by 15.1 (95 per cent c.i. 13.9 to 16.2) kg/m2 after standard and 15.7 (14.5 to 16.9) kg/m2 after distal RYGB; the between-group difference was −0.64 (−2.3 to 1.0) kg/m2 (P = 0.447). Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and haemoglobin A1c levels declined more after distal than after standard RYGB. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased more after standard RYGB. Vitamin A and vitamin D levels were lower after distal RYGB. Changes in bone mineral density, resting metabolic rate, and total energy intake were comparable.ConclusionDistal RYGB did not enable greater weight loss than standard RYGB. Differences in other outcomes favouring distal RYGB may not justify routine use of this procedure in patients with a BMI of 50–60 kg/m2. Registration number: NCT00821197 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).Presented in part as abstract to the IFSO (International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic disorders) conference, Madrid, Spain, August 2019.

Revision procedures after initial Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, treatment of weight regain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Morbid obesity is a global chronic disease, and bariatric procedures have been approved as the best method to control obesity. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the most common bariatric surgeries in the world and has become the gold standard procedure for many years. However, some patients experience weight regain or weight loss failure after the initial bypass surgery and require revisional or conversional interventions. International databases including PubMed, International Scientific Indexing (ISI), and Scopus were considered for a systematic search of articles that were published by 5th of May 2020. Forty-one published studies, which reported revision procedure on 1403 patients, were selected and analyzed for this review. The selected studies were categorized into six groups of revision procedures, including laparoscopic pouch resizing and/or revision of gastro-jejunal anastomosis (GJA), adjustable or non-adjustable gastric band over pouch ± pouch/GJA resizing, endoscopic revision of gastric GJA ± pouch, distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (DRGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) or single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with gastric sleeve (SADI-S), DRGB + Band or pouch/GJA resizing. Revision procedures result in more weight loss after the initial weight loss procedures. In the one-year follow-up, DRGB by itself with standardized mean difference (SMD) of - 1.24 presented a greater decrease in body mass index (BMI). DRGB plus band or pouch/GJA resizing, BPD-DS or SADI, adjustable or non-adjustable gastric banding over pouch ± pouch/GJA resizing, endoscopic pouch and/or GJA revision and laparoscopic pouch or/and GJA resizing revealed a lower decrease in BMI in order, respectively. In the three-year follow-up, BPD-DS or SADI-S method with SMD of - 1.40 presented the highest decrease in BMI. In follow, DRGB alone, adjustable or non-adjustable gastric banding over gastric pouch ± pouch / GJA resizing, DRGB + Band or gastric pouch/GJA resizing, laparoscopic pouch and/or GJA resizing and endoscopic revision of pouch and/or GJA revealed less reduction in BMI, respectively. In the five-year follow-up, DRGB alone procedures with SMD of - 2.17 presented the greatest reduction in BMI. Subsequently, BPD-DS or SADI-S, laparoscopic pouch and/or GJA size revision, and endoscopic revision of GJA/pouch revealed less overall decrease in BMI in order. All methods of revision procedures after the initial RYGB have been effective in the resolution of weight regain. However, based on the findings in this systematic review, it seems DRGB or BPD-DS/SADI-S is the most effective procedure in the long-term follow-up outcome. More studies with a higher number of patients and even longer follow-ups will be required to obtain more accurate data and outcome.

The Short-Term Effects of Transit Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy and Distal-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Glycemic Control, Weight Loss, and Nutritional Status in Morbidly Obese and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative metabolic and nutritional outcomes after transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy (TB-SG) and distal-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (D-RYGB). A retrospective evaluation was made of 109 morbidly obese patients who underwent TB-SG or D-RYGB. Primary outcomes included metabolic variables such as glycemic control and serum lipid levels, and secondary outcomes consisted of nutritional deficiencies and weight loss after surgical procedures. During the study period, 83 and 26 patients underwent D-RYGB and TB-SG, respectively. The preoperative characteristics and nutritional status of the groups were similar. D-RYGB resulted in significantly higher weight loss rates in the first 3months, but the percentage of excess weight loss (EWL %) was not different in the 12-month follow-up period. Although D-RYGB provided faster glycemic control due to early weight loss, there was no difference between the two groups. At the end of the follow-up period, the TB-SG was associated with significantly less deficiency of vitamin D, vitamin B12, iron, and folic acid. Anastomosis leakage was more common in the D-RYGB technique. The overall complication rates of the groups were similar. TB-SG is a safe and effective alternative to D-RYGB for the treatment of obesity-related metabolic disorders with fewer nutritional deficiencies.

Conversion of standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to distal bypass for weight loss failure and metabolic syndrome: 3-year follow-up and evolution of technique to reduce nutritional complications

BackgroundStandard proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) fails to achieve long-term weight maintenance and/or control of metabolic syndrome in up to 35% of patients. ObjectivesTo improve the performance of the standard proximal gastric bypass by increasing the biliopancreatic limb length at the expense of the common channel. SettingsAcademic-affiliated private practice. MethodsA retrospective review of all patients who underwent conversion to distal RYGB from 2010 to 2016 was performed. RYGB was modified by dividing the Roux limb at the jejunojejunostomy and transposing it distally to create a shortened total alimentary limb length (TALL) of 250 to 300 cm in the initial 11 patients. Of these, 7 developed protein calorie malnutrition and diarrhea requiring a second procedure to lengthen the common channel an additional 100 to 150 cm (TALL 400–450 cm), leading to resolution of all symptoms. The subsequent 85 patients were converted to distal RYGB with TALL 400 to 450 in a single-stage operation. ResultsNinety-six RYGB patients underwent conversion to distal RYGB. The mean body mass index and mean excess weight loss at the time of distalization was 40.6 kg/m2 and 33.6%. At 1, 2, and 3 years after distalization, the mean body mass index was reduced to 34.4, 33.1, and 32.2 kg/m2, respectively, and excess weight loss improved to 41.9%, 53.7%, and 65.7%, respectively. Diabetes resolved in 66.7%, hypertension resolved in 28.6%, hyperlipidemia resolved in 40%, and sleep apnea resolved in 50% at 1 year. The 30-day complication rate and reoperation rates were 6.3% and 5.2%; an additional 7.3% (7/96) required reoperation for limb lengthening. Hypoalbuminemia developed in 21% at 3 years, but no increase in iron deficiency was observed. Calcium metabolism was affected by the distalization procedure to a greater degree as 21% of patients had low corrected calcium levels, 77% were deficient in vitamin D, and parathyroid hormone levels were above normal in 64% at 3 years. ConclusionRevision of proximal RYGB to distal RYGB results in substantial improvement in weight loss and resolution of co-morbidities at 3 years. Diarrhea and protein calorie malnutrition were seen frequently in patients with TALL of 250 to 300 cm, whereas patients with TALL 400 to 450 cm demonstrated a lower incidence of nutritional issues, but the effect on calcium, parathyroid hormone, and the fat soluble vitamins A and D is still a major concern.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures 2\xa0Years After Standard and Distal Gastric Bypass\u2014a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundThe preferred surgical procedure for treating morbid obesity is debated. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are relevant for evaluation of the optimal bariatric procedure.MethodsA total of 113 patients with BMI from 50 to 60 were randomly assigned to standard (n = 57) or distal (n = 56) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Validated PROMS questionnaires were completed at baseline and 2 years after surgery. Data were analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures and the results are expressed as estimated means and mean changes.ResultsObesity-related quality of life improved significantly after both procedures, without significant between-group differences (− 0.4 (95% CI = − 8.4, 7.2) points, p = 0.88, ES = 0.06). Both groups had significant reductions in the number of weight-related symptoms and symptom distress score, with a mean group difference (95% CI) of 1.4 (− 0.3, 3.3) symptoms and 5.0 (2.9. 12.8) symptom distress score points. There were no between-group differences for uncontrolled eating (22.0 (17.2–26.7) vs. 28.9 (23.3–34.5) points), cognitive restraint (57.4 (52.0–62.7) vs. 62.1 (57.9–66.2) points), and emotional eating (26.8 (20.5–33.1) vs. 32.6 (25.5–39.7) points).The prevalence of anxiety was 33% after standard and 25% after distal RYGB (p = 0.53), and for depression 12 and 9%, respectively (p = 0.76).ConclusionsThere were no statistically significant differences between standard and distal RYGB 2 years post surgery regarding weight loss, obesity-related quality of life, weight-related symptoms, anxiety, depression, or eating behavior.Trial RegistrationClinical Trials.gov number NCT00821197

Revision of Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Weight Regain: a Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes.

Weight regain has led to an increase in revision of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgeries. There is no standardized approach to revisional surgery after failed RYGB. We performed an exhaustive literature search to elucidate surgical revision options. Our objective was to evaluate outcomes and complications of various methods of revision after RYGB to identify the option with the best outcomes for failed primary RYGB. A systematic literature search was conducted using the following search tools and databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Clinical Trials Database, Cochrane Review Database, EMBASE, and Allied and Complementary Medicine to identify all relevant studies describing revision after failed RYGB. Inclusion criteria comprised of revisional surgery for weight gain after RYGB. Of the 1200 articles found, only 799 were selected for our study. Of the 799, 24 studies, with a total of 866 patients, were included for a systematic review. Of the 24 studies, 5 were conversion to Distal Roux-en-y gastric bypass (DRYGB), 5 were revision of gastric pouch and anastomosis, 6 were revision with gastric band, 2 were revision to biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch (BPD/DS), and 6 were revision to endoluminal procedures (i.e., stomaphyx). Mean percent excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) after revision up to 1 and 3-year follow-up for BPD/DS was 63.7 and 76%, DRYGB was 54 and 52.2%, gastric banding revision 47.6 and 47.3%, gastric pouch/anastomosis revision 43.3 and 14%, and endoluminal procedures at 32.1%, respectively. Gastric pouch/anastomosis revision resulted in the lowest major complication rate at 3.5% and DRYGB with the highest at 11.9% when compared to the other revisional procedures. The mortality rate was 0.6% which only occurred in the DRYGB group. All 866 patients in the 24 studies reported significant early initial weight loss after revision for failed RYGB. However, of the five surgical revision options considered, BPD/DS, DRYGB, and gastric banding resulted in sustained weight loss, with acceptable complication rate.

Metabolomic fingerprint of severe obesity is dynamically affected by bariatric surgery in a procedure-dependent manner

Obesity is associated with multiple diseases. Bariatric surgery is the most effective therapy for severe obesity that can reduce body weight and obesity-associated morbidity. The metabolic alterations associated with obesity and respective changes after bariatric surgery are incompletely understood. We comprehensively assessed metabolic alterations associated with severe obesity and distinct bariatric procedures. In our longitudinal observational study, we applied a (1)H-nuclear magnetic resonance-based global, untargeted metabolomics strategy on human serum samples that were collected before and repeatedly ≤1 y after distinct bariatric procedures [i.e., a sleeve gastrectomy, proximal Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and distal RYGB]. For comparison, we also analyzed serum samples from normal-weight and less-obese subjects who were matched for 1-y postoperative body mass index (BMI) values of the surgical groups. We identified a metabolomic fingerprint in obese subjects that was clearly discriminated from that of normal-weight subjects. Furthermore, we showed that bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy and proximal and distal RYGB) dynamically affected this fingerprint in a procedure-dependent manner, thereby establishing new fingerprints that could be discriminated from those of BMI-matched and normal-weight control subjects. Metabolites that largely contributed to the metabolomic fingerprints of severe obesity were aromatic and branched-chain amino acids (elevated), metabolites related to energy metabolism (pyruvate and citrate; elevated), and metabolites suggested to be derived from gut microbiota (formate, methanol, and isopropanol; all elevated). Our data indicate that bariatric surgery, irrespective of the specific kind of procedure used, reverses most of the metabolic alterations associated with obesity and suggest profound changes in gut microbiome-host interactions after the surgery. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02480322.

A Novel Distal Very Long Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass (DVLRYGB) as a Primary Bariatric Procedure—Complication Rates, Weight Loss, and Nutritional/Metabolic Changes in the First 355 Patients

Proximal Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) representing the most frequently performed bariatric procedure yields a weight loss failure rate of around 20 %. In order to reduce failure rates, we established a novel distal RYGB variant characterized by a very long alimentary (Roux) limb and a short common channel. Up to 5 years, follow-up data (complication rates, weight loss, nutritional/metabolic changes) of the first 355 patients (mean ± SD preoperative age, 41.4 ± 10.8 years; BMI, 48.5 ± 11.5 kg/m(2)) who underwent the novel Distal Very Long Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass (DVLRYGB) were analysed. Overall follow-up rate was 98.9 %, mean follow-up time 1.6 ± 1.4 years. Limb lengths were as follows: common channel 76 ± 7 cm, biliopancreatic limb 79 ± 14 cm, and alimentary (Roux) limb 604 ± 99 cm. The operation was performed laparoscopically in 95.2 % of the cases. Thirty-day mortality was zero; major and minor complication rate was 4.5 % and 10.4 %, respectively. Average excess weight loss (EWL) was >74 % 3, 4, and 5 years after the operation and failure rate defined by an EWL < 50 % remained < 6 %. Annually blood measurements revealed a relatively low incidence rate of severe nutritional deficiencies, but mild anaemia and hypoproteinemia were frequently observed. Laparoscopic revision with a proximalization of the lower anastomosis was required in 4 (1.1 %) patients. Data indicate that our DVLRYGB leads to excellent weight loss results. Furthermore, within the setting of a structured multidisciplinary follow-up program, the incidence of severe malnutrition states was relatively low.

Laparoscopic Conversion of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Distal Gastric Bypass for Weight Regain

Weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the possible complications bariatric surgeons are confronted with. An option for enhancing weight loss is the conversion of RYGB into distal RYGB (DRYGB), which is a malabsorptive procedure. We report the technical strategy and the preliminary outcomes of conversion of RYGB to DRYGB by laparoscopy. Between April 2005 and November 2009, 7 patients benefited from laparoscopic conversion of RYGB to DRYGB for weight regain mainly due to a new dietary behavior, namely, polyphagia (eating too frequent meals). At the time of RYGB, the mean weight and BMI was 120.5 ± 26.4 kg and 43.2 ± 6.7 kg/m(2), respectively. Five patients suffered of obesity-related comorbidities. Mean interval time between RYGB and conversion was 41 ± 15.9 months. At the time of conversion, the mean weight, BMI, % excess weight loss were 100.7 ± 19.8 kg, 36.1 ± 4.8 kg/m(2), and 33.7% ± 12.1%, respectively. Obesity-related comorbidities at that time affected 4 patients. Mean operative time was 122.1 ± 34 minutes. There were no conversions to open surgery and no mortality. Postoperatively, 1 patient suffered of a bleeding. Mean hospital stay was 4.7 ± 2.5 days. After a mean follow-up of 19 ± 23.7 months, the mean weight, BMI, and % excess weight loss was 82.5 ± 19.7 kg, 29.5 ± 5.3 kg/m(2), and 57.6% ± 8.1%, respectively. Obesity-related comorbidities remained unchanged after the conversion in the 4 patients. One patient required a surgical reoperation for internal hernia. Conversion of RYGB to DRYGB for weight regain can safely be performed by laparoscopy, with satisfactory early results.

Long-term results of malabsorptive distal Roux-en- Y gastric bypass in superobese patients

Background The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and nutritional outcomes of malabsorptive distal Roux-en- Y gastric bypass (D-RYGB) 20–25 years later at a university hospital. Methods From 1985 to 1989, 49 mostly superobese (body mass index >50 kg/m 2) patients had undergone D-RYGB. D-RYGB consisted of open laparotomy with a 50-mL proximal gastric pouch and gastroenterostomy performed 250 cm proximal to the ileocecal junction, with common channels of 50–150 cm. These 49 patients were compared with a similar group of 92 consecutive patients who had undergone long-limb RYGB, with a 75-cm biliopancreatic limb and 150-cm alimentary limb. Results The mean ± SD preoperative body mass index was 58.9 ± 9.3 kg/m 2. After 1 perioperative death secondary to pulmonary embolism, limb-lengthening revisions were required in 21 (43.7%) of the 48 remaining patients for protein-calorie malnutrition. Of the 23 with a 50-cm common channel, 13 required revision compared with 8 of 25 with ≥100-cm common channel ( P <.05, chi-square). Of the 48 patients who had undergone D-RYGB, 8 had died 6–19 years after D-RYGB. Of the nonrevised patients, 19 (70.4%) of 27 had >5 years of follow-up. In these, the latest body mass index was 34.2 kg/m 2 at 10 ± 6.1 years. The percentage of excess weight loss was 66.8% ± 14%. The lowest late serum albumin level was 3.4 ± .5 g/dL (range 2.3–4.4). The mean 25-hydroxy vitamin D level was 14.6 ± 11.3 ng/mL. Compared with patients who had undergone long-limb RYGB, the D-RYGB patients had a significantly greater percentage of excess weight loss after 5 years but significantly lower albumin, hemoglobin, iron, and calcium levels. Conclusion Although D-RYGB afforded superior long-term weight loss, it caused protein-calorie malnutrition requiring frequent revision. The nonrevised patients had frequent severe metabolic derangements. Thus, D-RYGB should not be the primary operation for morbid or superobese patients.

Malabsorptive Gastric Bypass in Patients With Superobesity

Weight loss in superobese patients has been problematic after conventional gastric restrictive operations including conventional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The goal of the present study was to compare weight loss in patients with superobesity (body mass index ≥50 kg/m 2) using a distal RYGB (D-RY) in which the Roux-en-Y anastomosis was performed 75 cm proximal to the ileocecal junction (N = 47) vs. patients who had Roux limbs of 150 cm (N = 152) and 50 to 75 cm (N = 99). All operations incorporated the same gastric restrictive parameters. Minimum follow-up was 3 years and ranged to 16 years. Weight loss and reduction in body mass index were significantly greater after D-RY vs. both RYGB-150 cm and short RYGB and in RYGB-150 cm vs. short RYGB through 5 years. Mean percentage of excess weight loss peaked at 64% after DRY, at 61% after RYGB-150 cm, and at 56% after short RYGB. Weight loss maintenance through 5 years was correlated with Roux limb length with D-RY greater than RYGB-150 cm greater than short RYGB. More than 95% of obesity-related comorbid conditions improved or resolved with weight loss. There was no difference in the early postoperative morbidity rates: 9% after D-RY; 8% after RYGB-150 cm; and 2% after short RYGB with one death (0.3%). All D-RY patients had at least one postoperative metabolic abnormality. Anemia was significantly more common after D-RY vs. the shorter RYGB with no difference in the incidence of metabolic sequelae between RYGB-150 cm and short RYGB. No operations were reversed or modified for nutritional complications. Two D-RY patients required total parenteral nutrition for protein malnutrition. These results show that Roux limb length is correlated with weight loss in superobese patients. However, the greater incidence of metabolic sequelae after D-RY vs. RYGB-150 cm calls into question its routine use in superobese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We conclude that some degree of malabsorption should be incorporated into bariatric operations performed in superobese patients to achieve satisfactory long-term weight loss. ( J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:195–205.)

Band erosion: incidence, etiology, management and outcome after banded vertical gastric bypass.

Prosthetic devices have been used in bariatric operations to control the outlet of the gastric pouch and thus maintain weight loss. A complication of these prostheses is erosion or migration into the gastric lumen. The transected banded vertical gastric bypass (TBVGBP) is one of the modifications of gastric bypass. This modification has a silastic ring placed around the pouch to form the stoma. The records of patients with band erosion (BE) after this operation were reviewed, to determine the incidence, etiology, management and outcome during a 9-year period. From May 1992 through May 2001, 2,949 primary and secondary TBVGBP were performed through the Center for Surgical Treatment of Obesity, utilizing 3 hospitals. 48 patients (1.63%) were documented to have BE: 40 documented by us and 8 by subsequent treating surgeons or at other facilities. Presenting symptoms were weight regain (18), stenosis or obstruction (17), pain (9), bleeding (7), and 5 were incidental findings. Some patients presented with more than one symptom. 8 were treated expectantly with spontaneous extrusion of the band. 16 bands have been removed endoscopically in 14 patients. 26 patients had open surgical revision, with 12 having band removal only and 14 band removal and revision of either the gastroenterostomy with or without band replacement or conversion to a distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (DRYGBP). Two patients who had revision to DRYGBP were re-revised to a longer common limb because of protein malnutrition. Three patients who had revision of the gastroenterostomy with band removal and replacement developed leaks that were managed non-surgically. Two of these re-eroded and the band was removed endoscopically with a subsequent revision to a DRYGBP. There was no death due to BE. BE is an uncommon complication of TBVGBP. Infection, previous bariatric operations and surgical technique play a role in BE. BE is best managed by endoscopic removal but can be treated expectantly or by open surgical intervention. Band removal without replacement or revision to DRYGBP may result in weight regain.

Revision of failed gastric bypass to distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 65 cases.

No bariatric operation has been documented to effect adequate weight loss in all patients. Patients with inadequate weight loss or significant weight regain with an anatomically intact short-limb gastric bypass, of which the Fobi pouch operation (FPO) for obesity is a modification, are usually revised to a distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (DRYGBP) to enhance weight loss. A retrospective review of the charts of all patients who had a revision to a DRYGBP at our Center during an 8-year period was carried out and the findings analyzed. 65 patients who had the FPO had a revision to the DRYGBP. Most were super obese patients who, even though they had lost significant weight, were still morbidly obese. Some were patients who had not lost adequate weight or <40% excess weight, and a small number were patients who requested more weight loss even though they had a BMI of < 35. 15 patients developed protein malnutrition requiring supplemental feeding. 6 required rerevision to short-limb gastric bypass. Revision of short-limb gastric bypass to DRYGBP usually enhances weight loss but at a cost of an increased incidence of protein malnutrition.