ABSTRACT Objective While ultrasound therapy is common for carpal tunnel syndrome, the relative merits of thermal versus pulsed ultrasound remain unclear. This study compares their therapeutic effects. Design Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Ninety-two adults aged 30-60 years with mild-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (characteristic symptoms, positive clinical tests, abnormal electrophysiology) were randomized into 4 groups receiving 4 weeks night splinting plus 12 ultrasound sessions: Group A: 1 MHz, 1.0 W/cm2 continuous ultrasound for 5 minutes; Group B: 1 MHz, 25% duty cycle, 1.0 W/cm2 pulsed ultrasound for 15 minutes; Group C: 5 minutes thermal plus 15 minutes pulsed ultrasound; Group D: sham ultrasound for 15 minutes. Pain (VAS), function (DASH-Arabic), nerve conduction, and grip strength were measured at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks. Results Thermal and pulsed ultrasound groups improved in all outcomes versus placebo over 8 weeks (p < 0.05). Pulsed ultrasound decreased pain and distal motor latency more than placebo (p < 0.05). Thermal ultrasound increased sensory nerve action potentials versus placebo (p < 0.05). Conclusion Thermal and pulsed ultrasound with splinting improved pain, disability, grip strength, and nerve conduction in carpal tunnel syndrome. Pulsed ultrasound was optimal for pain and motor function, while thermal ultrasound enhanced sensory nerve function.
Read full abstract