Distal Esophageal Contraction Research Articles

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients with Type III Achalasia and Non Achalasia Esophageal Motility Disorders.

Background : Achalasia is a disease characterized by dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss. It is now classified into three subtypes according to the Chicago classification. Type III achalasia is characterized by lower esophageal sphincter obstruction with premature or spastic distal esophageal contractions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with type III achalasia as well as non achalasia esophageal motility disorders. Methods : This pilot prospective observational study was carried out on 12 patients aged from 18 to 75 years old, both sexes, with achalasia type III and non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders. Follow up after 3 months of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy was evaluated by Eckardt score. Results : There is significant decrease in mean Eckardt score after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (9.83 vs 1.17, P < 0.001) as t-test showed (t-test 13.23 with 95% CI 7.23- 10.11). Thus, the effect of POEM on reducing Eckardt score is statistically significant. During the operative procedure, the average length of myotomy measured 20.42 cm, with a mean operative duration of 55.33 minutes. Following a mean follow-up period of 15.83 months, the mean Eckardt score decreased to 1.17. Bleeding occurred during the procedure in three cases (25%), while mucosal injury was observed in only one case. Additionally, one case experienced postoperative chest infection. Conclusions : Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy is safe and effective intervention in the management of achalasia type III as well as non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders

Journey into the Esophageal Complications: Decoding Systemic Sclerosis with Cutting-Edge Endoscopy, Manometry, and Ambulatory pH-Study.

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disorder characterized by autoimmunity, fibrosis, and vasculopathy that affects the skin and internal organs, including the gastrointestinal tract, particularly the esophagus. This article highlights the characteristics and clinical symptoms of esophageal involvement in patients with SSc. This study was conducted between November 2022 to August 2023, including 26 already diagnosed cases of SSc in the Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation and Kurdistan Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology-Sulaymaniyah, Iraq. Esophageal involvement was investigated using esophageal manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring. Females were significantly predominant (P = 0.019) regarding the symptoms; 76.9% of the patients had heart burn, 76.9% dysphagia, 73.1% water brush, and 69.2% regurgitation. In total, 69.2% of the patients showed erosive gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD) on EGD, 76.9% had decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure (DLESP) and decreased distal esophageal peristaltic contractions (DDEPC) on esophageal manometry, and 84.6% had reflux on pH monitoring. Raynaud's phenomenon is the most common and typically the earliest clinical manifestation of SSc. The presence of erosive GERD was found to significantly increase the risk of developing dysphagia (B = 4.725, P = 0.014, OR = 3.482) and regurgitation (B = 3.521, P = 0.006, OR = 4.030). It is crucial to take gender-specific considerations into account when diagnosing and managing esophageal complications in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Additionally, employing various diagnostic assessments to detect esophageal involvement during SSc is essential. Erosive GERD has been identified as a risk factor that contributes to the development of dysphagia and regurgitation in individuals with SSc.

The Therapeutic Effect of Biling Weitong Granules Combined with Oryz-Aspergillus Enzyme and Pancreatin Tablet on Reflux Esophagitis with Functional Dyspepsia

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of Biling Weitong Granules combined with oryz-aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablets on patients with reflux esophagitis with functional dyspepsia. Methods: Sixty patients diagnosed with reflux esophagitis with functional dyspepsia who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University between June 2020 and June 2023 were selected and divided into two groups: the control group and the observation group, each consisting of 30 cases. The control group received oryz-aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablets only, while the observation group received Biling Weitong Granules in addition to the tablets. The clinical efficacy, Chinese medicine syndrome points, esophageal kinetic indexes, gastrointestinal hormone levels, and therapeutic safety of both groups were evaluated. Results: The total efficiency of the observation group reached 93.33%, significantly higher than the 73.33% of the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, patients in the observation group exhibited significantly lower scores for Chinese medicine symptoms such as early satiety, belching, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, and loss of appetite compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the observation group showed significantly higher upper esophageal sphincter pressure, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and distal esophageal contraction scores compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, levels of gastric motility hormone, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and gastrin were significantly higher in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Throughout the treatment period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups, indicating comparable safety of the two treatment modalities (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of Biling Weitong Granules with oryz-aspergillus enzyme and pancreatin tablets demonstrates significant efficacy in the treatment of reflux esophagitis with functional dyspepsia, with a better safety profile. This finding warrants further clinical promotion.

Unraveling the Dynamics of Esophageal Motility, Esophagitis Severity, and Age in GERD Patients: A Cross-Sectional Exploration.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is characterized by prolonged exposure of the esophageal mucosa to gastric content, with esophageal motility playing a pivotal role in its pathophysiology. This study employs a cross-sectional design to investigate the interplay between esophageal motility, the severity of esophagitis, and age in individuals presenting with GERD symptoms. The primary objective is to assess proximal and distal esophageal contractions in individuals with GERD symptoms, exploring potential correlations with the severity of esophageal lesions and age. A total of 47 patients reporting heartburn and acid regurgitation underwent diagnostic investigations, including esophageal manometry, radiological examinations, and endoscopy. Patients were categorized into groups based on the presence and severity of esophagitis. Esophageal contractions were monitored using a manometric method at various distances from the UES after swallowing 5 mL of water. Patients with severe esophagitis (SE) exhibited a reduced distal esophageal contraction amplitude compared to those without esophagitis (WE) or with moderate esophagitis (ME). No significant age-related differences were observed in esophageal contractions. Analyses included contraction amplitude, duration, area under the curve (AUC), and propagation time. This study provides insights into the nuanced relationship between esophageal motility, esophagitis severity, and age in GERD patients. The findings highlight the significance of distal esophageal contractions in SE cases, suggesting potential implications for disease progression. Age did not emerge as a significant factor influencing esophageal motility in this patient cohort.

INFLUENCE OF ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IMPAIRMENT ON UPPER AND LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE IN CHAGAS DISEASE.

Chagas disease causes digestive anatomic and functional changes, including the loss of the myenteric plexus and abnormal esophageal radiologic and manometric findings. To evaluate the association of abnormal esophageal radiologic findings, cardiac changes, distal esophageal contractions, and complaints of dysphagia and constipation in upper (UES) and lower (LES) esophageal sphincter basal pressure in Chagas disease patients. The study evaluated 99 patients with Chagas disease and 40 asymptomatic normal volunteers. The patients had normal esophageal radiologic examination (n=61) or esophageal retention without an increase in esophageal diameter (n=38). UES and LES pressure was measured with the rapid pull-through method in a 4-channel water-perfused round catheter. Before manometry, the patients were asked about dysphagia and constipation and submitted to electrocardiography and chest radiography. The amplitude of esophageal distal contraction decreased from controls to chagasic patients with esophageal retention. The proportion of failed and simultaneous contractions increased in patients with abnormal radiologic examination (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in UES and LES pressure between the groups. UES pressure was similar between Chagas disease patients with cardiomegaly (n=27, 126.5±62.7 mmHg) and those without it (n=72, 144.2±51.6 mmHg, P=0.26). Patients with constipation had lower LES pressure (n=23, 34.7±20.3 mmHg) than those without it (n=76, 42.9±20.5 mmHg, P<0.03). Chagas disease patients with absent or mild esophageal radiologic involvement had no significant changes in UES and LES basal pressure. Constipation complaints are associated with decreased LES basal pressure.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia and Achalasia-Like Syndromes: Insights From HRM and FLIP.

High-resolution manometry, Chicago Classification v4.0, the functional lumen imaging probe, Panometry, and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are all now integral parts of the landscape for managing achalasia or, more precisely, achalasia-like syndromes. This narrative review examines the impact of these innovations on the management of achalasia-like syndromes. High-resolution manometry was the disruptive technology that prompted the paradigm shift to thinking of motility disorders as patterns of obstructive physiology involving the esophagogastric junction and/or the distal esophagus rather than as siloed entities. An early observation was that the cardinal feature of achalasia-impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation-can occur in several subtypes: without peristalsis, with pan-esophageal pressurization, with premature (spastic) distal esophageal contractions, or even with preserved peristalsis (esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction). Furthermore, there being no biomarker for achalasia, no manometric pattern is perfectly sensitive or specific for 'achalasia' and there is also no 'gold standard' for the diagnosis. Consequently, complimentary physiological testing with a timed barium esophagram or functional lumen imaging probe are employed both to improve the detection of patients likely to respond to treatments for 'achalasia' and to characterize other syndromes also likely to benefit from achalasia therapies. These findings have become particularly relevant with the development of a minimally invasive technique for performing a tailored esophageal myotomy, POEM. Now and in the future, optimal achalasia management is to render treatment in a phenotype-specific manner, that is, POEM calibrated in a patient-specific manner for obstructive physiology including the distal esophagus and more conservative strategies such as a short POEM or pneumatic dilation for obstructive physiology limited to the lower esophageal sphincter.

Abnormal response after multiple rapid swallow provocation is not predictive of post-operative dysphagia following a tailored fundoplication approach.

The aim was to evaluate the clinical significance of multiple rapid swallows (MRS) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) prior to fundoplication. Despite pre-operative HRM, up to 38% of patients report post-fundoplication dysphagia. Suggestion that MRS improves prediction of dysphagia after fundoplication has not been investigated when using a tailored approach. We hypothesize response to MRS is predictive of dysphagia after tailored fundoplication. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing HRM with MRS provocation 5/2019-7/2021 at a single institution. Patients who underwent subsequent index laparoscopic fundoplication, without peptic stricture or achalasia, were included. After performing standard 10-swallow HRM, MRS provocation was performed. Patient-reported dysphagia frequency scores were collected at initial consultation and post-operative follow-up. At least weekly symptoms were considered clinically significant. Normal MRS response was defined as adequate deglutitive inhibition and MRS contractile response. Fundoplications were tailored based on standard HRM values. HRM was performed in 1201 patients, 220 met inclusion criteria. Clinically significant pre-operative dysphagia was reported by 85 (38.6%). Patients undergoing partial fundoplication (n = 123, 55.9%) had lower mean distal contractile integer, distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and percent peristalsis (p < 0.005). Post-operatively, 120 (54.5%) were without dysphagia, 59 (26.8%) had improved dysphagia, 26 (11.8%) had unchanged dysphagia, and 15 (6.8%) reported new dysphagia. There was no statistical difference in early or late dysphagia outcome between tailored fundoplication groups (p = 0.69). On univariate and multivariate analysis, neither MRS response, nor standard HRM metrics were significantly associated with post-operative dysphagia. Younger age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.986, p = 0.042) and the presence of pre-operative dysphagia (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.17-5.65, p = 0.015) were significant predictors of post-operative dysphagia. The risk of clinically significant dysphagia post-fundoplication is low when using a tailored approach based on standard HRM metrics. Additional data provided by MRS does not add to surgical decision-making using the investigated approach.

Bridge Swallowing Exercise for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms: A Pilot Study.

ABSTRACTObjectives:We previously reported that swallowing in the bridge position (bridge swallowing) increased distal esophageal contractions and lower esophageal sphincter pressure against gravity. Moreover, bridge swallowing had the potential to strengthen esophageal peristalsis. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether the bridge swallowing exercise could improve gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and gastroscopy findings.Methods:Seventeen subjects with scores of 8 points or higher on the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) questionnaire participated in the study. The exercise of dry swallowing in the bridge posture lasted 4 weeks and was performed ten times per day. FSSG scores were compared before and after exercise. Three of the 17 participants underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The modified Los Angeles classification of reflux esophagitis was used for objective assessment before and after exercise.Results:No participants dropped out of this study. FSSG scores improved significantly after exercise (from median [range] 16 [13–21] points before exercise to 5 [4–10] points after exercise, P <0.001). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed improvement in the modified Los Angeles classification grade in one participant.Conclusions:The bridge swallowing exercise significantly improves FSSG scores. This exercise can be performed easily and safely without adverse events. Further multicenter prospective studies are needed to validate that the bridge swallowing exercise is effective in improving GERD.

The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics.

To evaluate the impact of MSA on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body using high resolution impedance manometry. MSA is an effective treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is limited data on its impact on esophageal functional physiology. Patients who underwent MSA were approached 1-year after surgery for objective foregut testing consists of upper endoscopy, esophagram, high resolution impedance manometry, and esophageal pH-monitoring. Postoperative data were then compared to the preoperative measurements. A total of 100 patients were included in this study. At a mean follow up of 14.9(10.1) months, 72% had normalization of esophageal acid exposure. MSA resulted in an increase in mean LES resting pressure [29.3(12.9) vs 25(12.3), P < 0.001]. This was also true for LES overall length [2.9(0.6) vs 2.6(0.6), P = 0.02] and intra-abdominal length [1.2(0.7) vs 0.8(0.8), P < 0.001]. Outflow resistance at the EGJ increased after MSA as demonstrated by elevation in intrabolus pressure (19.6 vs 13.5 mmHg, P < 0.001) and integrated relaxation pressure (13.5 vs 7.2, P < 0.001). MSA was also associated with an increase in distal esophageal body contraction amplitude [103.8(45.4) vs 94.1(39.1), P = 0.015] and distal contractile integral [2647.1(2064.4) vs 2099.7(1656.1), P < 0.001]. The percent peristalsis and incomplete bolus clearance remained unchanged ( P = 0.47 and 0.08, respectively). MSA results in improvement in the LES manometric characteristics. Although the device results in an increased outflow resistance at the EGJ, the compensatory increase in the force of esophageal contraction will result in unaltered esophageal peristaltic progression and bolus clearance.

Impact of Feeding Strategies With Acid Suppression on Esophageal Reflexes in Human Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION:Aims were to test hypothesis that esophageal provocation-induced reflexes are superior with acid suppression plus feeding modifications vs acid suppression alone among infants treated for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).METHODS:Infants (N = 49, 41.3 ± 2.6 of postmenstrual age) with acid reflux index >3% underwent longitudinal motility testing (weeks 0 and 5) with graded midesophageal provocation to test randomly allocated therapies (4 weeks' proton pump inhibitor [PPI] ± feeding modifications) on sensory-motor aerodigestive reflexes. Feeding modification included restricted fluid volume <140 mL/kg per day, fed over 30 minutes in right lateral position and supine postprandial position. Primary motility outcome was frequency-occurrence of peristaltic reflex. Secondary outcomes included upper esophageal sphincter contractile reflex, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation reflex, respiratory change, and symptom characteristics.RESULTS:Treatment groups did not differ for primary outcome (odds ratio = 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.4–1.6, P = 0.99) or secondary outcomes (all P > 0.05). For both treatment groups at follow-up, distal esophageal contraction and LES tone decreased, and LES relaxation reflex occurrence is less frequent (all P < 0.05). In a subgroup analysis, comparing infants with PPI washout (N = 40) vs with continued (N = 9) PPI therapy, no differences were noted for aerodigestive reflex response frequency-occurrence (all P > 0.05).DISCUSSION:In infants with GERD, feeding modification with acid suppression is not superior to acid suppression alone in modifying aerodigestive reflexes (frequency, sensation, or magnitude). Contiguous areas targeted by GER, i.e., LES and distal esophageal functions, worsened at follow-up for both groups despite PPI therapy. Maturation is likely the key factor for GERD resolution in infants, justifying the use of placebo in clinical trials for objectively determined GERD.

Measurement of outflow resistance imposed by magnetic sphincter augmentation: defining normal values and clinical implication

IntroductionNo manometric criteria have been defined to select patients for magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA). The first step to establish such criteria is to measure the outflow resistance at esophagogastric junction (EGJ) imposed by MSA. This resistance needs to be overcome by the esophageal contraction in order for the esophagus to empty and to avoid postoperative dysphagia. This study was designed to measure the outflow resistance caused by MSA in patients free of postoperative dysphagia.MethodsRecords of the patients who underwent MSA in our institution were reviewed. A group of MSA patients with excellent functional outcome, who were free of clinically significant postoperative dysphagia, were selected. These patients then underwent high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) at a target date of 1 year after surgery. The outflow resistance was measured by the esophageal intrabolus pressure (iBP) recorded 2 cm proximal to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES).ResultsThe study population consisted of 43 patients. HRIM was performed at mean of 20.4 (10.4) months after surgery. The mean (SD) amplitude of the iBP was 13.5 (4.3) before surgery and increased to 19.1 (5.6) after MSA (p < 0.0001). Patients with a smaller size LINX device (≤ 14 beads) had a similar iBP when compared to those with a larger device (> 15 beads) [19.7 (4.5) vs. 18.4 (5.9), p = 0.35]. There was a significant correlation between the iBP and % incomplete bolus clearance [Spearman R: 0.44 (95% CI 0.15–0.66), p = 0.0032]. The 95th percentile value for iBP after MSA was 30.4 mmHg.ConclusionThe EGJ outflow resistance measured by iBP is increased after MSA. The upper limit of normal for iBP is 30 mmHg in this cohort of patients who were free of dysphagia after MSA. This degree of resistance needs to be overcome by distal esophageal contraction and will likely be requisite to prevent persistent postoperative dysphagia.

Clinical Significance of Esophageal Outflow Resistance Imposed by a Nissen Fundoplication

Attention has been focused on the amplitude of esophageal body contraction to avoid persistent dysphagia after a Nissen fundoplication. The current recommended level is a contraction amplitude in the distal third of esophagus above the fifth percentile. We hypothesized that a more physiologic approach is to measure outflow resistance imposed by a fundoplication, which needs to be overcome by the esophageal contraction amplitude. The esophageal outflow resistance, as reflected by the intra-bolus pressure (iBP) measured 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), was measured in 53 normal subjects and 37 reflux patients with normal esophageal contraction amplitude, before and after a standardized Nissen fundoplication. All were free of postoperative dysphagia. A test population of 100 patients who had a Nissen fundoplication was used to validate the threshold of outflow resistance to avoid persistent postoperative dysphagia. The mean (SD) amplitude of the iBP in normal subjects was 6.8 (3.7) mmHg and in patients before fundoplication was 3.6 (7.0) mmHg (p= 0.003). After Nissen fundoplication, the mean (SD) amplitude of the iBP increased to 12.0 (3.2) mmHg (p < 0.0001 vs normal subjects or preoperative values). The 95th percentile value for iBP after a Nissen fundoplication was 20.0 mmHg and was exceeded by esophageal contraction in all patients in the validation population, and 97% of these patients were free of persistent postoperative dysphagia at a median 50-month follow-up. Nissen fundoplication increases the outflow resistance of the esophagus and should be constructed to avoid an iBP > 20 mmHg. Patients whose distal third esophageal contraction amplitude is >20 mmHg have a minimal risk of dysphagia after a tension-free Nissen fundoplication.

Symptoms of Oesophageal Affection in Children With Scleroderma According to Mano-Impedancemetry: A Case Series

Background.Currently, scleroderma is a rather rare disease, including among children. Despite the growing interest of investigators in this pathology, the problem of diagnosing oesophageal affection in various forms of systemic sclerosis remains under-investigated since endoscopic data does not provide a complete picture of the oesophageal function. Currently, mano-impedancemetry (MIP) is the leading method in Europe for determining the oesophageal function, including in children with scleroderma; in the Russian Federation, it is used only in adults. Proper and timely evaluation of the oesophageal motility state will allow not only to expand our understanding of the disease pathogenesis but also to determine the efficacy of the initiated therapy and to give practice suggestions in terms of treatment tactics in the early stages of the disease.Our aim wasto determine the possibilities of mano-impedancemetry for diagnosing oesophageal affection in juvenile scleroderma.Patients and Methods.The study included children with juvenile scleroderma taken to the department of rheumatology and dermatology from June to August 2016. To identify oesophageal function disorders, all patients underwent high-resolution manometry in combination with impedancemetry.Results.A decrease in the distal oesophageal contraction amplitude in more than 30% of “wet” swallows was found in 2 of 7 children with juvenile systemic scleroderma and in one of 6 children with juvenile focal scleroderma. All 13 patients had peristaltic waves in the distal oesophagus with an amplitude of &lt;30 mm Hg. They had interrupted peristalsis, in which the peristaltic wave did not go through the entire length of the oesophagus; one of these patients showed a simultaneous contraction with an amplitude of &lt;30 mm Hg. All children (n=13) showed a positive correlation (r= 0.021) between the systemic disease and impaired motility (р=0.021).Conclusion.Despite the clinical and laboratory methods for diagnosing scleroderma, the data of oesophageal mano-impedancemetry is an important criterion, primarily for the differential diagnosis of systemic and focal scleroderma, and assists in the early initiation of therapy for oesophageal motility disorders.Marina Ju. Stepanyan, Ekaterina I. Alexeeva, Elena V. Komarova confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interest.Ekaterina I. Alexeeva — receiving research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Centocor, Novartis.Nikolay N. Murashkin — receiving research funding from pharmaceutical companies Jansen, Eli Lilly. Receiving fees for scientific advice from Galderma, Pierre Fabre, Bayer, Astellas, Libriderm.

Proximal esophageal contraction after induction of ineffective distal contraction by sildenafil in healthy volunteers.

Background:Proximal esophagus is composed of striated muscle replaced by smooth muscle in the distal section. Sildenafil, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, causes a decrease in the amplitude of contractions in distal smooth muscle esophagus, with no effect on the proximal esophageal striated muscle. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the hypothesis that proximal contractions are affected by changes in distal contractions caused by sildenafil.Methods:Esophageal motility was assessed by high resolution manometry in 22 healthy volunteers (12 women) aged 22-50 years (mean 38.1±7.7 years). All volunteers performed, in the sitting position, 10 swallows of liquid (5 mL of saline) and 10 swallows of solid boluses (1 cm3 pieces of bread), before and after ingestion of 50 mg of sildenafil. We evaluated the proximal esophageal contractions in response to the changes in distal esophageal motility induced by sildenafil.Results:Sildenafil caused a significant reduction in distal contractile integral and integrated relaxation pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter. In the proximal esophagus the alteration in distal esophageal contraction caused a significant increase in contraction length, contractile integral, and contraction duration.Conclusion:Induction of ineffective distal esophageal motility by sildenafil in healthy volunteers causes an increase in proximal esophageal motility, suggesting that proximal esophagus adapts to an induced impairment of distal esophageal motility.

Preoperative High‐Resolution Manometry Criteria are Associated with Dysphagia After Nissen Fundoplication

Dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication is challenging for patients. High-resolution manometry (HRM) has rarely been studied preoperatively to determine whether manometry values correlated with postoperative dysphagia after fundoplication. We aim to determine whether HRM criteria could predict dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication. A retrospective review of single-institution laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications (LNF) from 2013 to 2015 was completed. Dysphagia was graded using a standard scale. Four groups were: those with new postoperative dysphagia (ND), never had dysphagia (NV), continued dysphagia (CD), and resolved dysphagia (RD). Manometry criteria included distal contractile integral (DCI), contraction front velocity (CFV), distal latency (DL), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), percent peristalsis (PP), and distal esophageal contraction amplitude (DECA). Statistical bootstrapping was used to power sample sizes for ANOVA analysis. Ninety-four patients were included in the original cohort. Statistical bootstrapping sample size was 2992 patients. Among patients who did not have dysphagia prior to LNF, no HRM metric was associated with developing new dysphagia. Among those with dysphagia prior to LNF, a higher DCI, CFV, DL, PP, and DECA were associated with resolution of dysphagia. The RD group was 2.77 times more likely to have a DCI ≥ 1000mmHg-s-cm compared with the CD group. HRM criteria could not predict the development of postoperative dysphagia. However, in those with preoperative dysphagia and strong manometry criteria, dysphagia is more likely to resolve after Nissen fundoplication. Meanwhile, in those with preoperative dysphagia and weak manometry, dysphagia may persist and these patients may be better served with a partial fundoplication.

Bethanechol Does Not Improve Dysphagia in Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility and Defective Bolus Transit

Introduction: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a common motility disorder, defined as ≥ 50% weak swallows (distal contractile integral (DCI) < 450 mmHg-cm-sec). It is frequently associated with defective bolus transit and may present with dysphagia. Bethanechol, a direct-acting muscarinic receptor agonist, has been shown in pilot studies to increase distal esophageal contraction amplitude in healthy volunteers and patients with IEM. Methods: 9-weeks, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was conducted in patients with severe IEM with a main presenting complaint of dysphagia. Aim of study: Assess the effect of bethanechol (50 mg TID) on dysphagia & manometric changes in patients with IEM. Patients were given placebo or bethanechol for 4 weeks each in a stepwise fashion, then were crossed-over after a 1-week washout. Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-30 (MDC-30) and high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) obtained at baseline and at the completion of each arm. Adverse effects profile was assessed during the study. Statistical analysis: Non-parametric Friedman’s test was used to compare outcomes for bethanechol, placebo, and baseline. Mean differences and confidence intervals were estimated for the 3 groups<./p> Results: 10 patients completed the study (70% females). Mean age 57.3 years (SD+/-11.9). 1 patient dropped-out because of chest pain while on placebo. 44% of patients developed transient adverse effects that resolved within a week of bethanechol initiation. Median DCI for bethanechol was slightly higher, although it did not reach significance level: 307, Interquartile range (IQR) 39-1306 bethanechol; 208, IQR 72-1171 placebo; 225, IQR 62-495 baseline (P=0.39) (Figure 1). MDC-30 score was slightly lower for bethanechol: 4 (on scale of 0-10), IQR 0-8 bethanechol; 5, IQR 1-8 placebo; 5, IQR 3-10 baseline (P=0.34) (Figure 2).399_A Figure 1 No Caption available.399_B Figure 2 No Caption available.Conclusion: Bethanechol increased distal esophageal contraction amplitude to some extent and decreased sensation of dysphagia at 30-days compared to placebo and more profoundly to baseline. Though, these differences did not reach significance level. Our study’s small sample size likely underestimated the effect of bethanechol. Bethanechol was well-tolerated with absence of serious adverse events, with less than half of patients experienced minor adverse effects that resolved within 1 week of therapy. This pilot study opens the door to explore more the utility of bethanechol in the treatment of IEM.

Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes.

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.132.

Difference of achalasia subtypes based on clinical symptoms, radiographic findings, and stasis scores

IntroductionThree subtypes of achalasia have been defined through high-resolution esophageal manometry: subtype i shows no pressurization with swallows, subtype ii has increased isobaric panesophageal pressure, and subtype iii has distal esophageal spastic non-isobaric contractions. Studies describing the subtypes based on radiographic findings, clinical symptoms, and stasis scores are limited. AimTo determine the differences in clinical symptoms, radiographic findings, and stasis scores for the 3 achalasia subtypes. MethodsPatients undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry received a questionnaire about current symptoms and previous treatments. The questions included the presence of symptoms and their severity. Barium swallow tests were performed before the high-resolution esophageal manometry study to evaluate the maximum esophageal diameter. Stasis scores were calculated using the transit patterns on high-resolution esophageal manometry. ResultsOne hundred and eight patients with high-resolution esophageal manometry diagnosis of achalasia (n=8, subtype i; n=84, subtype ii; n=16, subtype iii) within the time frame of 1/2012-6/2015 were included in the study. Sex distribution was similar between the subtypes. Patient age was younger for subtype i (38±16 years), compared with subtypes ii (55±17 years) and iii (63±17 years) (P=.03). Esophageal symptoms did not differ between subtypes regarding the severity of nausea, chest pain, coughing, and heartburn, except for increased vomiting severity in subtype i (2.8±1.4 vs. 1.4±1.4 vs. 1.2±1.2, P<.01). A significant radiographic difference in esophageal dilation was seen between subtypes ii and iii (35.1±14.4 vs. 24.0±7.2mm, P=.023). Stasis scores did not significantly differ between the subtypes. ConclusionsAchalasia subtypes had similar clinical symptoms, except for increased vomiting severity in subtype i. The maximum esophageal diameter in subtype ii was significantly greater than in subtype iii. Esophageal stasis scores were similar. Thus, high-resolution esophageal manometry remains essential in assessing achalasia subtypes.

Treatments for achalasia in 2017: how to choose among them.

To review recent advances in achalasia diagnostics and therapeutics. The cardinal feature of achalasia, impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, can occur in association with varied patterns of esophageal contractility. The Chicago Classification distinguishes among these as follows: without contractility (type I), with panesophageal pressurization (type II), with premature (spastic) distal esophageal contractions (type III), or even with preserved peristalsis [esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outlet obstruction]. Physiological testing also reveals achalasia-like syndromes that also benefit from achalasia therapies. Coincident with this has been the development of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), an endoscopic technique for performing an esophageal myotomy. Hence, the option now exists to either selectively ablate the LES (pneumatic dilation, laparoscopic Heller myotomy, or POEM) or to ablate the sphincter and create a myotomy along some or the entire adjacent smooth muscle esophagus (POEM). Each achalasia syndrome has unique treatment considerations; type II achalasia responds well to all therapies, whereas type III responds best to POEM. Emerging data support the concept that optimal management of achalasia is phenotype-specific, guided by high-resolution manometry, and, in some instance, functional luminal imaging probe studies. This opinion article reviews the varied characteristic and treatment considerations of achalasia syndromes as currently understood.

Manometric Changes to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

To evaluate the manometric changes, function, and impact of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Implantation of a MSA around the gastroesophageal junction has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but its effect on the LES has not been elucidated. Retrospective case control study (n = 121) evaluating manometric changes after MSA. Inclusion criteria consisted of a confirmed diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease by an abnormal esophageal pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal hernia <3 cm, and absence of endoscopic Barrett disease). Manometric changes, pH testing, and proton pump inhibitor use were assessed preoperatively and 6 and 12 months after MSA. MSA was associated with an overall increase in the median LES resting pressure (18 pre-MSA vs 23 mm Hg post-MSA; P = 0.0003), residual pressure (4 vs 9 mm Hg; P < 0.0001), and distal esophageal contraction amplitude (80 vs 90 mm Hg; P = 0.02). The percent peristalsis remained unaltered (94% vs 87%; P = 0.71).Overall, patients with a manometrically defective LES were restored 67% of the time to a normal sphincter with MSA. Those with a structurally defective or severely defective LES improved to a normal LES in 77% and 56% of patients, respectively. Only 18% of patients with a normal preoperative manometric LES deteriorated to a lower category. MSA results in significant manometric improvement of the LES without apparent deleterious effects on the esophageal body. A manometrically defective LES can be restored to normal sphincter, whereas a normal LES remains stable.