Distal Esophageal Contraction Amplitude Research Articles

Unraveling the Dynamics of Esophageal Motility, Esophagitis Severity, and Age in GERD Patients: A Cross-Sectional Exploration.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is characterized by prolonged exposure of the esophageal mucosa to gastric content, with esophageal motility playing a pivotal role in its pathophysiology. This study employs a cross-sectional design to investigate the interplay between esophageal motility, the severity of esophagitis, and age in individuals presenting with GERD symptoms. The primary objective is to assess proximal and distal esophageal contractions in individuals with GERD symptoms, exploring potential correlations with the severity of esophageal lesions and age. A total of 47 patients reporting heartburn and acid regurgitation underwent diagnostic investigations, including esophageal manometry, radiological examinations, and endoscopy. Patients were categorized into groups based on the presence and severity of esophagitis. Esophageal contractions were monitored using a manometric method at various distances from the UES after swallowing 5 mL of water. Patients with severe esophagitis (SE) exhibited a reduced distal esophageal contraction amplitude compared to those without esophagitis (WE) or with moderate esophagitis (ME). No significant age-related differences were observed in esophageal contractions. Analyses included contraction amplitude, duration, area under the curve (AUC), and propagation time. This study provides insights into the nuanced relationship between esophageal motility, esophagitis severity, and age in GERD patients. The findings highlight the significance of distal esophageal contractions in SE cases, suggesting potential implications for disease progression. Age did not emerge as a significant factor influencing esophageal motility in this patient cohort.

Abnormal response after multiple rapid swallow provocation is not predictive of post-operative dysphagia following a tailored fundoplication approach.

The aim was to evaluate the clinical significance of multiple rapid swallows (MRS) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) prior to fundoplication. Despite pre-operative HRM, up to 38% of patients report post-fundoplication dysphagia. Suggestion that MRS improves prediction of dysphagia after fundoplication has not been investigated when using a tailored approach. We hypothesize response to MRS is predictive of dysphagia after tailored fundoplication. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing HRM with MRS provocation 5/2019-7/2021 at a single institution. Patients who underwent subsequent index laparoscopic fundoplication, without peptic stricture or achalasia, were included. After performing standard 10-swallow HRM, MRS provocation was performed. Patient-reported dysphagia frequency scores were collected at initial consultation and post-operative follow-up. At least weekly symptoms were considered clinically significant. Normal MRS response was defined as adequate deglutitive inhibition and MRS contractile response. Fundoplications were tailored based on standard HRM values. HRM was performed in 1201 patients, 220 met inclusion criteria. Clinically significant pre-operative dysphagia was reported by 85 (38.6%). Patients undergoing partial fundoplication (n = 123, 55.9%) had lower mean distal contractile integer, distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and percent peristalsis (p < 0.005). Post-operatively, 120 (54.5%) were without dysphagia, 59 (26.8%) had improved dysphagia, 26 (11.8%) had unchanged dysphagia, and 15 (6.8%) reported new dysphagia. There was no statistical difference in early or late dysphagia outcome between tailored fundoplication groups (p = 0.69). On univariate and multivariate analysis, neither MRS response, nor standard HRM metrics were significantly associated with post-operative dysphagia. Younger age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.986, p = 0.042) and the presence of pre-operative dysphagia (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.17-5.65, p = 0.015) were significant predictors of post-operative dysphagia. The risk of clinically significant dysphagia post-fundoplication is low when using a tailored approach based on standard HRM metrics. Additional data provided by MRS does not add to surgical decision-making using the investigated approach.

The Impact of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) on Esophagogastric Junction (EGJ) and Esophageal Body Physiology and Manometric Characteristics.

To evaluate the impact of MSA on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body using high resolution impedance manometry. MSA is an effective treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is limited data on its impact on esophageal functional physiology. Patients who underwent MSA were approached 1-year after surgery for objective foregut testing consists of upper endoscopy, esophagram, high resolution impedance manometry, and esophageal pH-monitoring. Postoperative data were then compared to the preoperative measurements. A total of 100 patients were included in this study. At a mean follow up of 14.9(10.1) months, 72% had normalization of esophageal acid exposure. MSA resulted in an increase in mean LES resting pressure [29.3(12.9) vs 25(12.3), P < 0.001]. This was also true for LES overall length [2.9(0.6) vs 2.6(0.6), P = 0.02] and intra-abdominal length [1.2(0.7) vs 0.8(0.8), P < 0.001]. Outflow resistance at the EGJ increased after MSA as demonstrated by elevation in intrabolus pressure (19.6 vs 13.5 mmHg, P < 0.001) and integrated relaxation pressure (13.5 vs 7.2, P < 0.001). MSA was also associated with an increase in distal esophageal body contraction amplitude [103.8(45.4) vs 94.1(39.1), P = 0.015] and distal contractile integral [2647.1(2064.4) vs 2099.7(1656.1), P < 0.001]. The percent peristalsis and incomplete bolus clearance remained unchanged ( P = 0.47 and 0.08, respectively). MSA results in improvement in the LES manometric characteristics. Although the device results in an increased outflow resistance at the EGJ, the compensatory increase in the force of esophageal contraction will result in unaltered esophageal peristaltic progression and bolus clearance.

Clinical Significance of Esophageal Outflow Resistance Imposed by a Nissen Fundoplication

Attention has been focused on the amplitude of esophageal body contraction to avoid persistent dysphagia after a Nissen fundoplication. The current recommended level is a contraction amplitude in the distal third of esophagus above the fifth percentile. We hypothesized that a more physiologic approach is to measure outflow resistance imposed by a fundoplication, which needs to be overcome by the esophageal contraction amplitude. The esophageal outflow resistance, as reflected by the intra-bolus pressure (iBP) measured 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), was measured in 53 normal subjects and 37 reflux patients with normal esophageal contraction amplitude, before and after a standardized Nissen fundoplication. All were free of postoperative dysphagia. A test population of 100 patients who had a Nissen fundoplication was used to validate the threshold of outflow resistance to avoid persistent postoperative dysphagia. The mean (SD) amplitude of the iBP in normal subjects was 6.8 (3.7) mmHg and in patients before fundoplication was 3.6 (7.0) mmHg (p= 0.003). After Nissen fundoplication, the mean (SD) amplitude of the iBP increased to 12.0 (3.2) mmHg (p < 0.0001 vs normal subjects or preoperative values). The 95th percentile value for iBP after a Nissen fundoplication was 20.0 mmHg and was exceeded by esophageal contraction in all patients in the validation population, and 97% of these patients were free of persistent postoperative dysphagia at a median 50-month follow-up. Nissen fundoplication increases the outflow resistance of the esophagus and should be constructed to avoid an iBP > 20 mmHg. Patients whose distal third esophageal contraction amplitude is >20 mmHg have a minimal risk of dysphagia after a tension-free Nissen fundoplication.

Preoperative High‐Resolution Manometry Criteria are Associated with Dysphagia After Nissen Fundoplication

Dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication is challenging for patients. High-resolution manometry (HRM) has rarely been studied preoperatively to determine whether manometry values correlated with postoperative dysphagia after fundoplication. We aim to determine whether HRM criteria could predict dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication. A retrospective review of single-institution laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications (LNF) from 2013 to 2015 was completed. Dysphagia was graded using a standard scale. Four groups were: those with new postoperative dysphagia (ND), never had dysphagia (NV), continued dysphagia (CD), and resolved dysphagia (RD). Manometry criteria included distal contractile integral (DCI), contraction front velocity (CFV), distal latency (DL), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), percent peristalsis (PP), and distal esophageal contraction amplitude (DECA). Statistical bootstrapping was used to power sample sizes for ANOVA analysis. Ninety-four patients were included in the original cohort. Statistical bootstrapping sample size was 2992 patients. Among patients who did not have dysphagia prior to LNF, no HRM metric was associated with developing new dysphagia. Among those with dysphagia prior to LNF, a higher DCI, CFV, DL, PP, and DECA were associated with resolution of dysphagia. The RD group was 2.77 times more likely to have a DCI ≥ 1000mmHg-s-cm compared with the CD group. HRM criteria could not predict the development of postoperative dysphagia. However, in those with preoperative dysphagia and strong manometry criteria, dysphagia is more likely to resolve after Nissen fundoplication. Meanwhile, in those with preoperative dysphagia and weak manometry, dysphagia may persist and these patients may be better served with a partial fundoplication.

Bethanechol Does Not Improve Dysphagia in Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility and Defective Bolus Transit

Introduction: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a common motility disorder, defined as ≥ 50% weak swallows (distal contractile integral (DCI) < 450 mmHg-cm-sec). It is frequently associated with defective bolus transit and may present with dysphagia. Bethanechol, a direct-acting muscarinic receptor agonist, has been shown in pilot studies to increase distal esophageal contraction amplitude in healthy volunteers and patients with IEM. Methods: 9-weeks, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was conducted in patients with severe IEM with a main presenting complaint of dysphagia. Aim of study: Assess the effect of bethanechol (50 mg TID) on dysphagia & manometric changes in patients with IEM. Patients were given placebo or bethanechol for 4 weeks each in a stepwise fashion, then were crossed-over after a 1-week washout. Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire-30 (MDC-30) and high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) obtained at baseline and at the completion of each arm. Adverse effects profile was assessed during the study. Statistical analysis: Non-parametric Friedman’s test was used to compare outcomes for bethanechol, placebo, and baseline. Mean differences and confidence intervals were estimated for the 3 groups<./p> Results: 10 patients completed the study (70% females). Mean age 57.3 years (SD+/-11.9). 1 patient dropped-out because of chest pain while on placebo. 44% of patients developed transient adverse effects that resolved within a week of bethanechol initiation. Median DCI for bethanechol was slightly higher, although it did not reach significance level: 307, Interquartile range (IQR) 39-1306 bethanechol; 208, IQR 72-1171 placebo; 225, IQR 62-495 baseline (P=0.39) (Figure 1). MDC-30 score was slightly lower for bethanechol: 4 (on scale of 0-10), IQR 0-8 bethanechol; 5, IQR 1-8 placebo; 5, IQR 3-10 baseline (P=0.34) (Figure 2).399_A Figure 1 No Caption available.399_B Figure 2 No Caption available.Conclusion: Bethanechol increased distal esophageal contraction amplitude to some extent and decreased sensation of dysphagia at 30-days compared to placebo and more profoundly to baseline. Though, these differences did not reach significance level. Our study’s small sample size likely underestimated the effect of bethanechol. Bethanechol was well-tolerated with absence of serious adverse events, with less than half of patients experienced minor adverse effects that resolved within 1 week of therapy. This pilot study opens the door to explore more the utility of bethanechol in the treatment of IEM.

Manometric Changes to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

To evaluate the manometric changes, function, and impact of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Implantation of a MSA around the gastroesophageal junction has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but its effect on the LES has not been elucidated. Retrospective case control study (n = 121) evaluating manometric changes after MSA. Inclusion criteria consisted of a confirmed diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease by an abnormal esophageal pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal hernia <3 cm, and absence of endoscopic Barrett disease). Manometric changes, pH testing, and proton pump inhibitor use were assessed preoperatively and 6 and 12 months after MSA. MSA was associated with an overall increase in the median LES resting pressure (18 pre-MSA vs 23 mm Hg post-MSA; P = 0.0003), residual pressure (4 vs 9 mm Hg; P < 0.0001), and distal esophageal contraction amplitude (80 vs 90 mm Hg; P = 0.02). The percent peristalsis remained unaltered (94% vs 87%; P = 0.71).Overall, patients with a manometrically defective LES were restored 67% of the time to a normal sphincter with MSA. Those with a structurally defective or severely defective LES improved to a normal LES in 77% and 56% of patients, respectively. Only 18% of patients with a normal preoperative manometric LES deteriorated to a lower category. MSA results in significant manometric improvement of the LES without apparent deleterious effects on the esophageal body. A manometrically defective LES can be restored to normal sphincter, whereas a normal LES remains stable.

Effect of nasal noninvasive respiratory support methods on pharyngeal provocation-induced aerodigestive reflexes in infants.

The pharynx is a locus of provocation among infants with aerodigestive morbidities manifesting as dysphagia, life-threatening events, aspiration-pneumonia, atelectasis, and reflux, and such infants often receive nasal respiratory support. We determined the impact of different oxygen delivery methods on pharyngeal stimulation-induced aerodigestive reflexes [room air (RA), nasal cannula (NC), and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)] while hypothesizing that the sensory motor characteristics of putative reflexes are distinct. Thirty eight infants (28.0 ± 0.7 wk gestation) underwent pharyngoesophageal manometry and respiratory inductance plethysmography to determine the effects of graded pharyngeal stimuli (n = 271) on upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES, LES), swallowing, and deglutition-apnea. Comparisons were made between NC (n = 19), nCPAP (n = 9), and RA (n = 10) groups. Importantly, NC or nCPAP (vs. RA) had: 1) delayed feeding milestones (P < 0.05), 2) increased pharyngeal waveform recruitment and duration, greater UES nadir pressure, decreased esophageal contraction duration, decreased distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and decreased completely propagated esophageal peristalsis (all P < 0.05), and 3) similarly developed UES contractile and LES relaxation reflexes (P > 0.05). We conclude that aerodigestive reflexes were similarly developed in infants using noninvasive respiratory support with adequate upper and lower aerodigestive protection. Increased concern for GERD is unfounded in this population. These infants may benefit from targeted oromotor feeding therapies and safe pharyngeal bolus transit to accelerate feeding milestones.

Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM): the Old-New Frontier in Esophagology.

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is characterized by distal esophageal contraction amplitude of <30 mmHg on conventional manometry (Blonski et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 103(3):699-704, 2008), or a distal contractile integral (DCI) < 450 mmHg*s*cm on high-resolution manometry (HRM) (Kahrilas et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 27(2):160-74, 2015) in≥50 % of test swallows. IEM is the most common abnormality on esophageal manometry, with an estimated prevalence of 20-30 % (Tutuian and Castell Am J Gastroenterol. 99(6):1011-9, 2004; Conchillo et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 100(12):2624-32, 2005). Non-obstructive dysphagia has been considered to be frequently associated with severe esophageal peristaltic dysfunction. Defective bolus transit (DBT) on multichannel intraluminal impedance testing was found in more than half of IEM patients who presented with dysphagia (Tutuian and Castell Am J Gastroenterol. 99(6):1011-9, 2004), highlighting the functional defect of this manometric finding. Treatment of IEM has been challenging because of lack of promotility agents that have a definite effect on esophageal function.

Beneficial effect of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone on esophageal dysfunction associated with systemic sclerosis: A pilot study.

Esophageal involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) carries significant morbidity and is empirically managed with domperidone, albeit with questionable efficacy. The oral 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone may enhance esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function in healthy volunteers. We aimed to test the hypothesis that buspirone may exert a beneficial acute effect on esophageal motor dysfunction in symptomatic patients with SSc. Twenty consecutive patients with SSc reporting esophageal symptoms underwent high-resolution manometry before and 30 minutes after administration of buspirone (10 mg). Ten other patients received domperidone (10 mg) and served as control group. Changes in LES resting and residual pressure, amplitude, duration, and velocity of distal esophageal body contractions were examined. Esophageal hypomotility and hypotensive LES was found in 63% and 67% of patients, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including baseline manometric parameters, were comparable between groups. Resting pressure of LES increased after buspirone from 9.42 ± 2.6 to 11.53 ± 3.4 mmHg (p = 0.0002 by paired t-test), but not after domperidone; a trend for increase of amplitude of contractions was also observed after buspirone (p = 0.09). Comparison of the individual changes revealed that buspirone was superior to domperidone in enhancing LES pressure ( + 2.11 ± 2.0 versus -0.45 ± 2.3 mmHg, p = 0.006). No significant effects of either drug were noted on other examined parameters of esophageal function. The beneficial acute effect of buspirone on impaired LES function associated with SSc suggests a role of 5-HT1A receptor-mediated interactions in these patients. Prospective studies to examine whether buspirone is of long-term therapeutic value for SSc-associated esophageal disease are warranted.

Can Different Subsets of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Influence the Outcome of Nissen Fundoplication?

BackgroundIneffective esophageal motility (IEM) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease includes three different subsets that may affect symptom profiles. Our aim was to assess symptoms and functional outcome in patients with erosive esophagitis according to different subsets of IEM, before and after Nissen fundoplication (NF). MethodologyA retrospective study with prospective follow-up of 72 patients with reflux esophagitis and IEM in whom open NF was performed. Based on principal manometric esophageal body motility disorder, patients were divided in three groups: predominantly low-amplitude (LAC, N = 38), non-propulsive (NPC, N = 18), and simultaneous low-amplitude esophageal contractions (SC, N = 16). Patients underwent symptomatic questionnaire and stationary esophageal manometry before and 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery. ResultsPreoperatively, patients in NPC and SC groups had higher mean scores of dysphagia, without statistical significance as opposed to the LAC group (p = 0.239). Postoperative dysphagia occurred in 36 patients, without statistical significance between groups regarding dysphagia grades (p = 0.390). A longer duration of postoperative dysphagia was noted in the SC group (p < 0.05). Improvement of nadir values of contraction amplitudes in distal esophagus occurred postoperatively in all groups, significantly higher in LAC (p < 0.001). ConclusionThree years after NF, successful symptomatic and functional outcome was achieved in analyzed groups of patients with erosive esophagitis regardless of IEM subtype.

Mo1596 High Resolution Manometric Predictors of Post-Fundoplication Dysphagia

INTRODUCTION Post-fundoplication dysphagia is a well-described side effect of antireflux surgery. Esophageal manometry is a standard part of the preoperative evaluation prior to antireflux surgery. However, controversy exists regarding the value of traditional manometry to predict post-operative dysphagia after fundoplication. Today, high-resolution manometry (HRM) has replaced traditional water perfused systems for the analysis of esophageal physiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of HRM in predicting post-operative dysphagia in patients with an otherwise functioning Nissen fundoplication. METHODS Patients who underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at a single institution were identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients were asked to undergo routine post-operative testing 6-12 months after surgery. Patients who had normal post-operative 24-hour pH test scores were eligible for the study. Of these patients, those without available raw data from preoperative HRM were excluded. Traditional ineffective motility (IEM) was defined as mean distal esophageal contraction amplitude of <30mmHg or 30% or less peristaltic waves. Post-operative dysphagia was graded using a standard scoring system (0= never, 1=1-2 times a month, 2=1-2 times per week, 3=daily). A symptom score of 2-3 was used to define post-operative dysphagia. Regression and association analysis of pre-operative manometric risk-factors were performed to determine predictors of post-operative dysphagia. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS 95 patients (41 male; 54 female) were included in the analysis. Mean post-operative length of follow up was 14.9 months (range: 2-73). 70.2% patients had normal scores on all HRM parameters. Any dysphagia was reported by 50% of patients (17% grade-1, 23.4% grade-2, and 9.5% grade-3) Nineteen patients had traditional IEM. Of those with dysphagia, one also had traditional IEM. On univariate analysis only distal latency (DL) was found to be a significant predictor (p<0.001) of grade-3 but not grade-2 dysphagia. On multivariate analysis, no preoperative factors were found to be significant predictors of grade-3 dysphagia, but contraction front velocity predicted grade2 dysphagia. CONCLUSION Persistent daily dysphagia occurs in ~10% of patients following an otherwise successful Nissen fundoplication. Advancements in manometric technology provide additional data points in the preoperative analysis of these patients. This analysis reveals that elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is a useful new metric to predict post-operative dysphagia in addition to traditional identification of weak distal esophageal contraction amplitudes. Pre-operative factors as predictors of post-fundoplication dysphagia

Mo1597 Impedance Planimetry as a Diagnostic Tool to Evaluate the Degree of Clinical Lower Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION Post-fundoplication dysphagia is a well-described side effect of antireflux surgery. Esophageal manometry is a standard part of the preoperative evaluation prior to antireflux surgery. However, controversy exists regarding the value of traditional manometry to predict post-operative dysphagia after fundoplication. Today, high-resolution manometry (HRM) has replaced traditional water perfused systems for the analysis of esophageal physiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of HRM in predicting post-operative dysphagia in patients with an otherwise functioning Nissen fundoplication. METHODS Patients who underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at a single institution were identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients were asked to undergo routine post-operative testing 6-12 months after surgery. Patients who had normal post-operative 24-hour pH test scores were eligible for the study. Of these patients, those without available raw data from preoperative HRM were excluded. Traditional ineffective motility (IEM) was defined as mean distal esophageal contraction amplitude of <30mmHg or 30% or less peristaltic waves. Post-operative dysphagia was graded using a standard scoring system (0= never, 1=1-2 times a month, 2=1-2 times per week, 3=daily). A symptom score of 2-3 was used to define post-operative dysphagia. Regression and association analysis of pre-operative manometric risk-factors were performed to determine predictors of post-operative dysphagia. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS 95 patients (41 male; 54 female) were included in the analysis. Mean post-operative length of follow up was 14.9 months (range: 2-73). 70.2% patients had normal scores on all HRM parameters. Any dysphagia was reported by 50% of patients (17% grade-1, 23.4% grade-2, and 9.5% grade-3) Nineteen patients had traditional IEM. Of those with dysphagia, one also had traditional IEM. On univariate analysis only distal latency (DL) was found to be a significant predictor (p<0.001) of grade-3 but not grade-2 dysphagia. On multivariate analysis, no preoperative factors were found to be significant predictors of grade-3 dysphagia, but contraction front velocity predicted grade2 dysphagia. CONCLUSION Persistent daily dysphagia occurs in ~10% of patients following an otherwise successful Nissen fundoplication. Advancements in manometric technology provide additional data points in the preoperative analysis of these patients. This analysis reveals that elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is a useful new metric to predict post-operative dysphagia in addition to traditional identification of weak distal esophageal contraction amplitudes. Pre-operative factors as predictors of post-fundoplication dysphagia

Manometric assessment of esophageal motor function in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

Introduction/aimPrimary biliary cirrhosis is associated with other autoimmune diseases including Sjögren's syndrome, and scleroderma. Esophageal dysmotility is well known in scleroderma, and Sjögren's syndrome. The aim of this study is to investigate whether any esophageal motor dysfunction exists in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. MethodThe study was performed in 37 patients (36 women, mean age: 56.29±10.01years) who met diagnostic criteria for primary biliary cirrhosis. Thirty-seven functional dyspepsia patients, were also included as a control group. Patients entering the study were asked to complete a symptom questionnaire. Distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure were assessed. ResultsManometric findings in primary biliary cirrhosis patients vs. controls were as follows: Median lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (mmHg): (24 vs 20, p=0.033); median esophageal contraction amplitude (mmHg): (71 vs 56, p=0.050); mean lower esophageal sphincter relaxation duration (sc, x±SD): (6.10±1.18 vs 8.29±1.92, p<0.001); and median lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (%) (96 vs 98, p=0.019); respectively. No significant differences were evident in median peak velocity (sc) (3.20 vs 3.02, p=0.778) between patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and the functional dyspepsia patients. Esophageal dysmotility was found in 17 (45.9%) primary biliary cirrhosis patients (non-specific esophageal motor disorder in ten patients, hypomotility of esophagus in five patients, nutcracker esophagus in one patient and hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter in one patient). ConclusionEsophageal dysmotility was detected in 45.9% of patients. The study suggests that subclinic esophageal dysmotility is frequent in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Bolus retention in hiatal hernia identified by high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance

Esophageal acid retention in a hiatal hernia (HH) may play a role in gastro-esophageal reflux. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of bolus retention (BR) in HH and to compare pressure profiles in patients with HH with BR in the hernia to those with bolus clearance (BC) through the hernia using high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HREMI). Clinical HREMI studies with HH ≥1.5cm were analyzed for lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD) pressures and pressure profiles during 12 saline swallows. Impedance was analyzed for swallow retention in the HH. Bolus retention in a HH was present in 35 of 53 (66%) patients with a HH. Patients with BR had overall lower pressure profiles including a lower basal LES pressure (14.8±10.6 vs 28.9±16.8mmHg; p=0.0001), LES-CD gradient (6.8±17.9 vs 20.6±12.2mmHg; p=0.002), residual LES pressure (2.5±4.6 vs 6.1±12.2mmHg; p=0.017), amplitude of distal esophageal contractions (83.2±38.8 vs 111.2±42.8mmHg; p=0.020), and distal contractile integral (1487±1016 vs 2608±1221mmHg-cm-sec; p=0.001) compared to the BC group. Patients with BR were more likely to have a larger sized HH compared to the BC group (3.1±1.6 vs 2.1±0.6cm; p=0.016); similar pressure changes were found when the groups were divided up by HH sizes. Bolus retention was seen in 66% of patients with HH. Bolus retention in the HH was associated with larger HH size, lower LES pressure, and lower esophageal contractile pressures compared to those with BC.

Symptoms and esophageal motility based on phenotypic findings of scleroderma

Scleroderma esophagus is characterized by ineffective peristalsis and reduced esophageal sphincter pressure. Esophageal disease in scleroderma can precede cutaneous manifestations and has been associated with Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of cutaneous findings, RP, and PF on demographics, symptoms, and esophageal motility in patients with scleroderma. Scleroderma patients with esophageal involvement were included after review of esophageal manometries and charts over a 6-year period. High-resolution esophageal manometry was performed. Patients completed a symptom questionnaire. The study enrolled 28 patients (22 females; mean age 50.3 ± 12.8 years) with scleroderma esophagus. Patients without skin involvement (n= 12) reported more severe heartburn (P= 0.02), while those with cutaneous findings (n= 16) had more frequent dysphagia with solids (P= 0.02). Patients with RP (n= 22) had lower amplitude of distal esophageal contractions (P= 0.01) than those without RP (n= 6). Patients with PF (n= 11) reported more severe coughing and wheezing (both P= 0.03) than those without lung disease (n= 17). This study highlights subgroups of patients with scleroderma esophagus according to phenotypic findings of dermatologic changes, RP, and PF. Heartburn and dysphagia are important symptoms that may be associated with different stages of disease progression based on skin changes in scleroderma. RP was associated with greater esophageal dysmotility. Coughing and wheezing were more severe in patients with PF.

Esophageal Motility in Children With Suspected Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Motility abnormalities in adults with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) include nontransmitted contractions, reduced distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and simultaneous contractions. Information on esophageal body motility in children with GERD is scarce. Our aim was to study esophageal motility patterns in children with GERD, taking into account the presence of anatomical abnormalities and neurological impairment, the effect of age on esophageal motility in GERD, and the relation between esophageal manometry and GERD severity parameters (acid exposure and presence of esophagitis). Consecutive children referred for severe GER(D) symptoms underwent a barium swallow, upper endoscopy, pH monitoring, and stationary water-perfused esophageal manometry. Mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and velocity of propagation in the proximal and distal esophagus decreased with age in this group of children with GERD (all P < 0.01). Severely disturbed esophageal motility was found in children with previous esophageal atresia. Patients with psychomotor retardation had significantly lower occurrence of peristaltic waves (94% +/- 21% vs 79% +/- 38%; P = 0.001), distal propagation velocity (0.8 +/- 0.4 vs 0.6 +/- 0.5 cm/s; P = 0.05), and distal contraction duration (3.1 +/- 0.8 vs 3.4 +/- 1 seconds; P = 0.05). None of the manometric characteristics differed between patients with normal or abnormal esophageal pH monitoring or with or without erosive esophagitis. LES pressure and esophageal velocity decreased with increasing age. Esophageal manometry is severely impaired in children with esophageal atresia and psychomotor retardation. No specific esophageal motor abnormalities related to the presence of endoscopic esophagitis or abnormal pH monitoring were found.

Gender-Related Variation in Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure and Esophageal Body Function

Purpose: Esophageal manometry (EM) is the gold standard examination for diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders. Gender-related variation is a well recognized normal physiological phenomenon. To date, there are very limited gender specific data relevant to EM measurements. The aim of this study was to obtain values of EM in healthy males and females to determine if gender variation exists in normal esophageal motor function. Methods: Healthy men and women were recruited from the Jacksonville, FLmetropolitan area. Exclusion criteria were symptoms suggestive of esophageal disease, medication use or concurrent illness that could affect EM. All underwent EM using a solid-state system with wet swallows (Polygram Net, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure, percent peristaltic contractions, distal esophageal body contraction velocity, distal esophageal body contraction amplitude and distal esophageal body contraction duration were measured at end-expiration. Results: Sixty-three males and 66 females were enrolled. All subjects completed EM without difficulty. The male group was significantly younger than the female group (M 31.4 ± 10.6 years old, F 35.2 ± 10; P < 0.04). Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure (RELSP), distal esophageal contraction duration (DEBCD) and distal esophageal body contraction amplitude (DEBCA) were significantly higher in females compared to males while distal esophageal body contraction velocity (DEBCV) was significantly lower in females than males (P < 0.05, Table). There were no differences seen in lower esophageal sphincter length (LESL) and percent peristaltic contractions (%PC). Conclusion: Significant gender-related differences exist in EM findings. These differences underscore the need for gender specific reference values for EM studies to allow for the accurate diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.Table: Gender specific esophageal motility parameters

Utility of esophageal impedance in identifying dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis

This study was intended to assess the utility of combined multiple intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) in evaluating reflux patients and in identifying those with esophageal dysmotility. Thirteen controls and 20 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) underwent combined MII-EM with a catheter containing four impedance-measuring segments and four solid-state pressure transducers. Each subject received 10 liquid and 10 viscous boluses to be swallowed. Distal esophageal contraction amplitude was significantly lower in GERD patients than in controls for viscous swallows (58.3 +/- 7.3 mmHg versus 82.4 +/- 4.1 mmHg, P = 0.005). Total bolus transit time was significantly slower in GERD patients than in controls for liquid swallows (P = 0.035). The percentages of complete bolus transit were significantly lower in GERD patients compared with controls (all P = 0.005). Half of GERD patients with normal EM still had abnormal bolus transit while three-quarters of those with abnormal EM had abnormal bolus transit. MII helps identify bolus transit abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Combined MII-EM is clinically useful for detecting esophageal dysmotility in patients with erosive esophagitis.

Ethnic Variation in Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure and Length

Purpose: Esophageal manometry (EM) is the gold standard examination for diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders. Normal values for EM in ethnic groups residing in the United States are only available for Hispanic Americans in the literature. The aim of this study was to obtain values of EM in healthy adult African American (AA) volunteers and compare these to those obtained in healthy non-Hispanic white (nHw) volunteers to determine if ethnic variation exists in normal esophageal motor function. Methods: Healthy AA and nHw were recruited from the Jacksonville metropolitan area. Ethnicity was self-reported. Exclusion criteria were symptoms suggestive of esophageal disease, medication use or concurrent illness that could affect EM. All underwent EM using a solid-state system with wet swallows (Polygram Net, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure and lower esophageal sphincter length were measured at end-expiration while percent peristaltic contractions, distal esophageal contraction velocity, amplitude and duration were measured after 5 cc H20 swallows. Results: Fifty-six AA and 48 nHw were enrolled. All subjects completed EM without difficulty. Volunteer age ranged from 18 to 57 years old and was not different between groups. Males comprised 48% of both groups. Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure, lower esophageal sphincter length and distal esophageal contraction duration were significantly higher in AA than nHw (P < 0.05, table). There were no differences seen in percent peristaltic contractions, distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and distal esophageal contraction velocity. Conclusion: Significant ethnic differences exist in EM findings. These differences underscore the need for race specific reference values for EM studies to allow for the accurate diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in AA patients.Table: Esophageal manometry parameters in healthy African Americans (N = 56) and non-Hispanic whites (N = 48)